June 29, 2005
Wednesday Is Poetry Day: Whitman's Civil War
Here's a great poem, written by America's greatest poet, who was an eyewitness to what he writes about.
The ArtillerymanÂ’s Vision
While my wife at my side lies slumbering, and the wars are over long,
And my head on the pillow rests at home, and the vacant midnight passes,
And through the stillness, through the dark, I hear, just hear, the breath of my infant,
There in the room, as I wake from sleep, this vision presses upon me:
The engagement opens there and then, in fantasy unreal;
The skirmishers begin—they crawl cautiously ahead—I hear the irregular snap! snap!
I hear the sounds of the different missiles—the short t-h-t! t-h-t! of the rifle balls;
I see the shells exploding, leaving small white clouds—I hear the great shells shrieking as they pass;
The grape, like the hum and whirr of wind through the trees, (quick, tumultuous, now the contest rages!)
All the scenes at the batteries themselves rise in detail before me again;
The crashing and smoking—the pride of the men in their pieces;
The chief gunner ranges and sights his piece, and selects a fuse of the right time;
After firing, I see him lean aside, and look eagerly off to note the effect;
—Elsewhere I hear the cry of a regiment charging—(the young colonel leads himself this time, with brandish’d sword
I see the gaps cut by the enemyÂ’s volleys, (quickly fillÂ’d up, no delay
I breathe the suffocating smoke—then the flat clouds hover low, concealing all;
Now a strange lull comes for a few seconds, not a shot fired on either side;
Then resumed, the chaos louder than ever, with eager calls, and orders of officers;
While from some distant part of the field the wind wafts to my ears a shout of applause, (some special success
And ever the sound of the cannon, far or near, (rousing, even in dreams, a devilish exultation, and all the old mad joy, in the depths of my soul
And ever the hastening of infantry shifting positions—batteries, cavalry, moving hither and thither;
(The falling, dying, I heed not—the wounded, dripping and red, I heed not—some to the rear are hobbling;
Grime, heat, rush—aid-de-camps galloping by, or on a full run;
With the patter of small arms, the warning s-s-t of the rifles, (these in my vision I hear or see,)
And bombs busting in air, and at night the vari-colorÂ’d rockets.
We're coming up on the one hundred forty-second anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg (July 1 to July 3, 1863) and the conclusion of the Vicksburg Campaign (May 19 to July 4, 1863). With Shelby Foote's death yesterday and the Fourth of July this weekend it's appropriate to remember the most important event in our nation's history. Of course i'm talking about the Civil War.
Yesterday in the comments to my post about Shelby Foote's death i mentioned how i am fascinated by the differences between our own time and the way people lived in the time of the Civil War.
We all have a pretty good idea of how soldiers fight today. Heck, we've grown up watching war on tv. But it's almost impossible for most of us to imagine how men fought during the Civil War. It must have taken a special kind of courage and discipline to march side by side with a bunch of other men towards a line of cannon and guns.
Posted by: annika at
08:03 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 581 words, total size 3 kb.
1
And have you seen the terrain at Vicksburg? All hellish inclines and fish-in-a-barrel valleys. I can't imagine rushing the lines atop those ridges in the sweltering heat, wearing wool, carrying the dead weight of a musket.
Korea is the closest I've seen to hills and valleys like those. Only, those men ran up and down those mountains in freezing cold, cold so profound that cartridges froze in breeches and refused to fire.
Every field has its advantages and disadvantages. In Baghdad, Taqaddam, Ramadi, and Balad the sand is everywhere. It's hard to walk in, let alone run with 100 lbs of gear. In Mosul, it was hilly, and everywhere was late-winter mud.
Since Whitman's time, everything has changed, but for the footsoldier, nothing really has changed at all. It's a matter of legs and back and heart and love for the men you're fighting with, until you're home again, awakening next to your wife with the din of battle in your ears.
Thanks for the poem, Annika.
Posted by: Steven Givler at June 29, 2005 10:53 AM (6iOub)
2
If you are a fan of Foote's, might I recommend a lighter perspective from Tony Horowitz, "Confederates in the Attic".
Posted by: Will Stewart at June 29, 2005 11:11 AM (GzvlQ)
3
Thanks for the recommendation Will.
Steven, i have been to Vicksburg, when i was thirteen. Sadly i didn't appreciate what i saw at that age. The story of the Vicksburg Campaign, and how Grant severed his supply lines before going back to begin the seige, is fascinating and underappreciated. It's an argument against the popular misconception of Grant as a simpleton or a drunk.
Posted by: annika at June 29, 2005 12:04 PM (zAOEU)
4
Hmmmmm, as bloody as the civil war battlefield was, there is comfort in the closeness of one's comrades. Shared hardship, all that stuff men live for.
Today, an attack can come from any direction at any time. And it's also worth remembering that more died of disease than wounds in the civil war. Death was a lot closer to the living experience of the 19th century. It's more foreign to us, so more extreme today.
Go watch "Blackhawk Down" again, and then try to compare.
Posted by: Casca at June 29, 2005 04:39 PM (qBTBH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 28, 2005
Remembering Shelby Foote
Shelby Foote died this morning in Memphis at age 88.
Shelby Foote was the man. About two years ago, i had the pleasure of finishing his Proustian three volume history, The Civil War: A Narrative. It took me nine months of reading to finish it, and like having a baby i imagine, it was both painful and rewarding at the same time.
You may be familiar with Mr. Foote from his talking head appearances in Ken Burns' Civil War series on PBS. His folksy style and always interesting anecdotes were what interested me in his writings originally. So i bought his short novel Shiloh, which was not bad. With my membership in the History Book Club, and a few surplus bonus points, i purchased the 14 volume illustrated Time Life version of the Civil War narrative. i intended to just look at the pretty pictures, set them on a shelf to impress friends with, and maybe pass them on to my kids someday. i never intended to read it.
i saw Ken Burns' documentary, i have two history degrees, i thought i knew enough about the Civil War. And besides, my concentration was always WWII and postwar history. CW history was for the real history geeks, not me. Still, one day i picked up the first volume of the Time Life set during an idle moment, and read a few paragraphs. Amazing. That led to a few chapters and pretty soon i was committed.
The Narrative is very readable -- Foote was a novelist first -- but it is also very detailed. Having read it, i realize now how superficial the Ken Burns documentary was. And that thing was like 12 hours long! To do full justice to the huge subject that is the American Civil War takes time. A lot of time. But as has been said so often, you can't truly understand America without understanding the Civil War. And i do believe that.
It helps to have an interest in military history, though. Because Foote's history describes every single battle and campaign from both a micro and macro perspective. The macro is often the most esoteric, and difficult material. But along with that stuff, there's plenty of personal, political and biographical detail, which makes the Narrative the most comprehensive popular history of the Civil War that will ever be published.
i worked through it partly for the challenge. i knew the general outline of the war, and i knew i had to get to the big events. Sumter, the Bull Runs, Antietam, Vicksburg, Gettysburg, Emancipation, Sherman's march, Appomatox, Ford's Theater, etc. But i learned so much along the way that i had to finish it. To my surprise, i found that some of my favorite subject matter was the history of naval operations during the war. That's a much deeper subject than just the Monitor vs. Virginia battle. Some of the shit that happened on the rivers is pretty unbelievable.
Anyways, i would love to have shaken Shelby Foote's hand and thanked him for having written that huge work, which kept me enthralled for the better part of a year. i almost consider him a professor of mine, because through his books i became a Civil War buff, which i was not before i started.
More: And in the great minds think alike department: The Maximum Leader also wishes he could have shaken the celebrated author's hand.
Posted by: annika at
01:46 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 575 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Classy post, Annika. I saw the most of the Burns documentary, and I found Foote wonderful to listen to, very knowledgeable and very HUMAN.
Big applause to you for reading his entire CW set of books. I go to book stores often and stare at his CW set like a climber does Mt. Everest. One would love to complete the challenge, but you know in advance that it will be a sacrifice.
I will miss him, despite not reading his work. A sad testament of humanity is that we acknowledge our greatest people AFTER their death.
Posted by: Mark at June 28, 2005 04:22 PM (Vg0tt)
2
Mark, that everest analogy made me smile. That's exactly it! i did that too during many a stop at Barnes & Noble's history section. But i finally bit the bullet, and you can too. i boast a little because i am sort of proud of myself for having read the whole thing.
The thing about WWII is that you can really learn a lot about it from movies and the History Channel without having to crack a book. But that's not so with the Civil War. Historically accurate movies are really hard to find, and there's not that much on the History channel. Unlike WWII the world back then was too different from our own time, and that puts people off. But the differences are what fascinate me the most, along with the great characters: Lincoln, Grant, Lee, Jackson, MacLellan.
i've fallen off on my Civil War reading in the last year or two, but it's a great fun subject.
Posted by: annika at June 28, 2005 04:48 PM (zAOEU)
3
"A sad testament of humanity is that we acknowledge our greatest people AFTER their death."
Shit Mark, it's widely known, that he had chicks out the ying-yang.
Maybe the hardest thing about comprehending the civil war is understanding the zeitgeist. I grew up in an abolitionist stronghold that produced Joshua Giddings & Benjamin Wade, founders of the Republican Party. Wade was the President of the Senate during Andrew Johnson's impeachment, and so was one vote shy of replacing him. Today, the county is a democrat boil on the ass of the rustbelt. C'est la vie.
Posted by: Casca at June 28, 2005 05:22 PM (qBTBH)
4
Yeah Foote was great, even though I often got tired of the civil war, i did like his narration.
I am intrigued that you have two history degrees, I have an economics degree, and after 25 years i have gone back to get a second degree in history to write about history from an economic perspective.
BTW I am currently writing this while the president is giving his address. I may be a silly man, but his voice seems soothing to me. Can you imagine what i would be feeling if i were hearing the halting disembodied brahminisim of Kerry, or the shrill hate speach of Hillary?
Posted by: Kyle at June 28, 2005 05:30 PM (7Re84)
5
imagine what it would have been like to hear the high-pitched country-bumpkin accent of Abraham Lincoln. But his words live forever don't they?
Posted by: annika at June 28, 2005 06:34 PM (dtHLB)
6
Annie:
I'm impressed.
Anyone that finished that American/Russian Novel will have no trouble slogging through year two of law school.
You should be able to do it on your hip.
Posted by: shelly at June 28, 2005 06:56 PM (pO1tP)
7
"Shelby Foote was the man"
I agree. I am in the middle of Volume II.
Robots, basketball, air-conditioning and now the Civil War. You are become more perfect every day.
Posted by: Jake at June 28, 2005 07:35 PM (r/5D/)
8
"Today, the county is a democrat boil on the ass of the rustbelt."
And I thought Annika was the only poet here.
Posted by: Mark at June 28, 2005 11:07 PM (xKJ2p)
9
I loved the Narrative. I never found it bursensome. I especially liked the flashes of humor that revealed so much of the character in the personalities of the Civil War. Here is one incident related by Foote that comes immediately to mind: At the beginning of the War, when many Southern career officers in the old Army were resigning their commissions to join the Confederate army, Sherman sees George Thomas, a Virginian, leaving the War Department, and assumes the worse. "George, where are you going?" he asks. "I'm going south, Bill" Thomas responds. "But George, I vouched for you to the War Department. You're putting me in a terrible spot," Sherman complained. "Not to worry, Bill," Thomas responded, "I'm going south at the head of my troops."
Posted by: Ralphyboy at June 29, 2005 12:33 AM (BYNGx)
10
"...CW history was for the real history geeks, not me."
lol - guess again Annika! But we still love you
Posted by: jimilove at June 29, 2005 04:47 AM (BN/Fu)
11
In general, Ken Burns' series was excellent and Shelby Foote's contributions were critical to its success. The one big criticism I have about the series is that apart for touching very briefly on the subject when discussing the origin of Arlington National Cemetery, essentially no mention is made of the thousands of southerners who remained loyal to the union, and took up arms against their relatives and former friends. Don't forget that so many counties in Virginia stayed loyal to the union that the state of West Virginia was formed. This is also one of the reasons why the union had far more men available despite populations that were much closer. I know that southerners in general don't like to be reminded of this extremely important historical fact, but by ignoring it, Burns and Foote left out the most emotional and fundamental part of the story.
Posted by: Edward Cole at August 07, 2005 08:48 PM (DVf2A)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 15, 2005
Today Is St. Valdemar's Day

Today, i quote something i wrote when i first started blogging:
While you're looking at the Dannebrog, it might be a good time to note that the Danish flag is the oldest national flag in the world. It has been in use since the 1200's. Legend says that King Valdemar the Victorious was fighting a battle against the Estonians on St Viti's Day in 1219. The Estonians had thrown all their best warriors at the Danish and their attack was succeeding. The Danish were on the retreat when they received a sign from God: the Dannebrog floating down out of the sky! The Danish soldiers caught the flag and then fought back with renewed strength, eventually defeating the Estonians with the help of the 'Sign of the Cross.'
The day of the battle is still celebrated in Denmark as Valdemar's Day, which falls on June 15th. Everyone in Denmark displays the flag on that day, just like we do in the U.S. on our own Flag Day, June 14th.
Posted by: annika at
07:12 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.
1
(psst-- thank you, Annika)
-K
Posted by: Kevin Kim at June 15, 2005 09:05 AM (1PcL3)
2
(posted in the wrong comments thread, too. nuts.)
-K
Posted by: Kevin Kim at June 15, 2005 09:06 AM (1PcL3)
3
I didn't know about Valdemar's Day. I do remember that Tivoli rules!
Or at least it did when I was 8.
Posted by: Trevor at June 15, 2005 10:06 AM (RwZxT)
Posted by: Casca at June 15, 2005 03:26 PM (qBTBH)
5
"The Danish soldiers caught the flag and then fought back with renewed strength, eventually defeating the Estonians with the help of the 'Sign of the Cross.'"
"Sign of the Cross"?!
Apparently the ACLU does not have offices in Denmark.
Posted by: Mark MuNu at June 21, 2005 01:47 AM (TBkLy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 12, 2005
A Forgotten Great American
John Hawkins has a post about the
Greatest Americans of all time. Allow me to mention a forgotten great American, who didn't make anybody's list, without whom life would be very different all over the world.

The man is Willis Haviland Carrier, the father of air conditioning.
In 1902, fresh out of Cornell University and working as an engineer at Buffalo Forge Co., Carrier developed the world's first modern air conditioner, combining temperature and humidity control in one system, for a Brooklyn, NY, printing plant. He earned a patent for this system design in 1906. His air conditioner used a centrifugal system, under low pressure, to gather air through a filter and pass that air over coolant-filled coils. That cooled and dehumidified air was directed at its target location while warmer air around the motor was vented out of the location. The technology behind Carrier's air conditioner was patented in 1911 and is the basis for air conditioner technology available today.
The ability to control indoor temperatures has influenced almost every aspect of our daily lives. Think about it -- where we live, where we work, what we eat, what we wear, what we smell like, how we travel, our architecture, our modern healthcare, our life expectancy, food storage, what we read, how much leisure time we enjoy, even the existence of the computer you are reading this on --
all influenced by or made possible by air conditioning.
Look back for a moment to the world before the widespread use of refrigeration and air conditioning—a world that was still very much present well into the first decades of the 20th century. Only fresh foods that could be grown locally were available, and they had to be purchased and used on a daily basis. Meat was bought during the daily trip to the butcher's; the milkman made his rounds every morning. If you could afford weekly deliveries of ice blocks—harvested in the winter from frozen northern lakes—you could keep some perishable foods around for 2 or 3 days in an icebox. As for the nonexistence of air conditioning, it made summers in southern cities—and many northern ones—insufferable. The nation's capital was a virtual ghost town in the summer months. As late as the 1940s, the 60-story Woolworth Building and other skyscrapers in New York City were equipped with window awnings on every floor to keep direct sunlight from raising temperatures even higher than they already were. Inside the skyscrapers, ceiling and table fans kept the humid air from open windows at least moving around. Throughout the country, homes were built with natural cooling in mind. Ceilings were high, porches were deep and shaded, and windows were placed to take every possible advantage of cross-ventilation.
By the end of the century all that had changed. Fresh foods of all kinds were available just about anywhere in the country all year round—and what wasn't available fresh could be had in convenient frozen form, ready to pop into the microwave. The milkman was all but gone and forgotten, and the butcher now did his work behind a counter at the supermarket. Indeed, many families concentrated the entire week's food shopping into one trip to the market, stocking the refrigerator with perishables that would last a week or more. And on the air-conditioning side of the equation, just about every form of indoor space—office buildings, factories, hospitals, and homes—was climate-controlled and comfortable throughout the year, come heat wave or humidity. New homes looked quite different, with lower rooflines and ceilings, porches that were more for ornament than practicality, and architectural features such as large plate glass picture windows and sliding glass doors. Office buildings got a new look as well, with literally acres of glass stretching from street level to the skyscraping upper floors. Perhaps most significant of all, as a result of air conditioning, people started moving south, reversing a northward demographic trend that had continued through the first half of the century. Since 1940 the nation's fastest-growing states have been in the Southeast and the Southwest, regions that could not have supported large metropolitan communities before air conditioning made the summers tolerable.
Living in Sacramento, i should thank Mr. Carrier every day. Come to think of it, so should George W. Bush, as the great southern migration of the last few decades, which increased the electoral value of the red states, can be traced back to the widespread use of indoor air conditioning.
More: Jeff Harrell names another forgotten great American, Norman Borlaug. After reading Jeff's post, i'd have to agree.
Posted by: annika at
10:50 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 763 words, total size 5 kb.
1
I am impressed that you would have Carrier on your list. A very insightful choice.
The two events that had the biggest effect on the South were the Civil War and the invention of air conditioning.
Annika, you are full of pleasant surprises.
Posted by: jake at June 12, 2005 11:41 PM (r/5D/)
Posted by: annika at June 12, 2005 11:44 PM (GcTxN)
3
Yes! And the time has come for us to share this technology with the British and the French, who have yet to recognize the existence of
ice cubes, let alone air conditioning!
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at June 13, 2005 01:42 AM (1PcL3)
4
Hey! What happened to the Baywatch banner?
Posted by: Victor at June 13, 2005 04:37 AM (L3qPK)
Posted by: scof at June 13, 2005 05:08 AM (x8hF4)
6
Glad to see you mention Carrier...on hot days, I've often had the same thought.
There are billions of people without air conditioning, some of them in very hot places. As economic development permits some of these people to afford a/c for the first time, the impact on world energy demand is going to be pretty powerful.
Posted by: David Foster at June 13, 2005 06:31 AM (7TmYw)
7
A very thoughtful choice, Annika. My family has often wished to canonize "whoever invented air conditioning" as a saint. Now I finally know who he is.
Thanks!
Posted by: Mark at June 13, 2005 07:21 AM (Hk4wN)
8
Hey Annika. That is an important post. I wonder, how did he accomplish that great feat without the benefits of affirmative action and diversity? Oh yes, that's right, by working hard and being smart as an individual.
On an unrelated note, I couldn't find you email so I thought I'd put this link down of a new post of mine you might like to link:
http://www.affbrainwash.com/chrisroach/archives/019951.php
Posted by: Roach at June 13, 2005 07:42 AM (MRlvg)
9
While you are at it, send the Frenchies and Brits some soap and deoderant to discover as well.
Having endured Sacramento during the summer months in a dark suit and tie, I can testify that Carrier deserves not only to be on the list; he deserves to head it.
There is nothing like Sacramento in the summer to make one want to settle in Southern California.
Posted by: shelly at June 13, 2005 08:47 AM (pO1tP)
10
every now and then i intend be a wet blanket.
this is one of those times.
i think a lot of people mis-use the adjective "great" as a description of an american.
atticus finch was a great american.
yes he is/was real, and i also believe in santa claus.
neil armstrong was a great american. he came into service of his country when it needed his skills, and then went to private life.
truth be told, he was probably afraid of having family members kidnapped, ala lindbergh.
while mr. carrier's contribution to our way of life in this country is at the very pinnacle of achievement, i don't see him as a "great" american. i do agree with everything said about the influences to our behaviour, health, and everyday way of life. however, i.e., what would air conditioning and refrigeration be without electricity? that would make tessla a "greater" american, even though he was italian, i think.
i'll just pull this wet blankie over me and just log off.........
Posted by: louielouie at June 13, 2005 02:29 PM (xKfMm)
11
Since you make some great points about the founder of my employer's sister company, I just thought I'd point out this link
http://www.global.carrier.com/details/0,2806,CLI1_DIV28_ETI3684,00.html
Carrier had it's 100th anniversary in '02, and they still have some neat links on this page.
And louielouie, I agree that perhaps the term "great American" needs to be qualified, or perhaps better defined, but I do have one quibble. Tesla was born in Serbia, but emigrated to the U.S. and did most of his inventing here. I think that qualifies him as an American.
Posted by: Trevor at June 13, 2005 03:47 PM (GtBBB)
12
"There is nothing like Sacramento in the summer to make one want to settle in Southern California."
There's six years on the Gulf Coast. Sacramento in the summer can't POSSIBLY touch New Orleans or Tallahassee for unmitigated hot humid hell. God bless Mr. Carrier. Someone once asked me what people did in New Orleans before A/C. The short answer that a hell of a lot of them died. There's a reason Tulane's med school is especially well-known in the field of tropical diseases.
Ah, hurricanes, earthquakes, pestilence, whatever: thank God I'm back in New England where the only freakish natural phenomena are the 8+ months of winter each year. ;-)
Posted by: Dave J at June 13, 2005 08:36 PM (ZKuUj)
13
I read the post without reading the comments and was inspired to write
my own post about someone I consider a greater American than Carrier. Imagine my surprise when I read LouieLouie's comment. LOL
Tesla became a United States citizen in 1891, so I do believe that he qualifies as a Great American. His inventions created the modern world we enjoy today. Edison's most famous invention would be little more than a limited use curiosity without Tesla's alternating current generating/transmission system.
BTW, Trevor, Tesla was born in Croatia, not Serbia.
Posted by: delftsman3 at June 17, 2005 09:37 PM (vooSr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
46kb generated in CPU 0.0501, elapsed 0.1072 seconds.
63 queries taking 0.0971 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.