September 09, 2005
Yay annika's journal Readers!
We are up to $2,150 for hurricane relief, and the TTLB Board reads over 1.3 million dollars!
If you haven't contributed yet, jump on the bandwagon!
Posted by: annika at
10:03 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Annie, I sent our latest contribution to the Humane Society credited to you.
Posted by: Hugo at September 09, 2005 10:52 AM (Yu24L)
Posted by: Thomas Galvin at September 09, 2005 11:09 AM (HcJoL)
3
Annika
We have all become better people since we started reading your blog.
Posted by: Jake at September 09, 2005 06:55 PM (r/5D/)
4
d'you say it an -ee ka or an ik-a..?
Posted by: annika at September 10, 2005 02:45 AM (F1nba)
5
Hugo says:
ah-nikk-ah (Sometimes, I channel our governor to do it.)
Posted by: Hugo at September 10, 2005 06:06 AM (Yu24L)
Posted by: annika at September 10, 2005 06:50 AM (50bxN)
7
My cousin Annika's name is pronounced ah-nik-ah.
Posted by: Jake at September 10, 2005 09:47 AM (r/5D/)
8
Ahnie:
We need some more cheerleading. You are stuck at $2,250 right now, but you need to get to about $5,000.
WE can all do a little better; let's bump her over $5,000 guys (and female guys).
Posted by: shelly at September 11, 2005 07:32 AM (6krEN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 05, 2005
A Kiss To Build A Dream On

This week's Cotillion Ball is being held in four ballrooms at the very top of the Hotel Blogosphere. Besides this room, where i am your humble M.C., we have
RightGirl,
Merri Musings and
Stacy, each of whom have wonderful festivities planned for today. As you stroll around the dance floor, i'd like you to imagine listening to the music of some great musicians from the city of New Orleans and the state of Louisiana. Foremost is of course Sachmo, whose version of "A Kiss To Build A Dream On" is one of the great classics of all time.
Crystal Clear deserves congratulations for having landed a dream job in Hawaii, not an easy state to make a living in. And she'll be doing good work, too.
[A]fter a great deal of soul-searching it really seemed to me that the consistent pattern and passion in my life has always been children and likely always will be serving the underserved children and watching out for the kids many people consider "throw aways".
Yay Crystal!

Darleen has a provocatively titled post, "Jesus Was Not A Socialist."
No where in [Jesus'] teachings does one find a call that GOVERNMENT must use its power to redistribute property from the earners to the needers. Indeed, Jesus preached about the difference between the Government and individuals.
. . .
Socialism is not about individuals giving of their own earned property. It's about self-selected people of power deciding to fulfill their own desires with someone else's property taken by force.
Morality assumes choice. Socialism is a matter of, at best, amorality, because it robs people of choice.
Well said, Darleen.

Dr. Sanity discusses a common phenomenon many of us observe when trying to understand the leftist mind at work. It's called "denial."
When belief in any idea become a matter of faith--and one's own identity is defined by that faith--then the psyche will do anything necessary to distort or deny any truth that contradicts that belief.
. . .
I fear that is the choice that those on the Left are making right now, although they like to imagine that those of us who are fighting against the new threats to human freedom and dignity are the ones suffering from delusion.
Claire has compiled a number of, let me say it, evil statements made by those on the left who like to trumpet their "compassion" so loudly. As i said in an earlier post of mine, tragedies like Katrina reveal character. In the aftermath of the hurricane, Claire addresses Jesse Jackson Jr's question, "Who are we to say what law and order should be in this unspeakable environment?"
When all hell breaks loose, for some the niceties of self-disciplined social interaction disappear in a wash of mind-numbing fear and desperation. Others, realize that desperate times call for even more rigorous commitment to the principles of civilized behavior—that set of Values which makes a hellish situation infinitely more manageable.

At
Fistful of Fortnights, Sadie interviews über-blogger
Dan Riehl, who has been covering the Natalee Holloway story extensively.
Sadie: You believe that Joran Van der Sloot emailed you hours before he was arrested. What made these emails seem authentic?
Dan: Joran or someone close to him - why else would someone go to the trouble? I thought maybe him and his Father together Â… the emails were written with some awareness of the law, as well as forming public opinion. That isnÂ’t your average seventeen year old on his own.
Florida Cracker and her visitors raised an amazing $3,100 to help the animal victims of Hurricane Katrina. It's yet another example of the generous hearts out there in the blogosphere.
RightGirl has a beautiful post about the friends we make on-line, and the limitations of those friendships.
[E]very once in a while, you come across a person who touches you. You make a friend, and the boundaries of real life vs. internet blur a little at the edges. . . . You get caught up in their dramas: their joys and sorrows. Sometimes you prefer them to those real friends, because you don't know them well enough to know their ugly habits. . . . But when these people that you have come to hold as real suffer something large and devastating, you feel that pain, too. But because they are only 'imaginary,' there often isn't anything you can do. You can pray. You can try to reach out. But miles and boundaries get in the way. Sometimes, you just have to let them drop.

It seems to me like Hurricane Katrina was fresh meat to some lefty bloggers who have become a pack of hungry dogs.
Ilyka Damen takes aim at the silliness of some of the barking bloggers and blogtrolls on the left.
For the last time: You have a participatory form of government. PARTICIPATE. Or:
"When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, 'Who is destroying the world?' You are."
But then, the woman who wrote that was not a progressive, so we can ignore her.

And finally,
KelliPundit, a Louisiana clinical pharmacist, tells of her frustrations dealing with various bureaucracies at the same time as she's trying to help hurricane refugees.
Here's the largest, most profound problem recognized by all medical personnel yesterday: People needed to get prescriptions filled. Many are already in the system for state medicare or had private insurance - but didn't have 3 bucks for the co-pay. I see all of these corporations giving a million bucks in cash which is a good thing-but for at least one corporation out there I know of a great need that has not been met yet. But what we really, really needed was for a drug chain to step forward and volunteer to cover peoples co-pay for refugees. Can you imagine how many prescriptions could be filled with a one million dollar donation for co-pays?? Many, many of our problems would have been solved.

Just as Louisiana is a like a smorgasboard of great musicians, you can see that the Cotillion is a buffet of great blogging. Okay, that was a horribly lame analogy, but it's late and i think you get the picture.
P.S. i almost forgot everyone's favorite Louisiana musician/mom-to-be!
Posted by: annika at
11:03 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1081 words, total size 9 kb.
1
My favorite New Orleans/jazz artists. Aaron Neville,
Louis Armstrong, Ernie K-doe, Erma Thomas, Dorothy Moore, and Jimmy LaRocca's Original Dixieland Jazz Band.
Posted by: Kyle N at September 06, 2005 04:29 AM (Fw2pa)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thank You And Let's Keep It Going
As a young Catholic School girl, i was taught that donations to charity should be made with humility. So, when i asked you all for help with the
Blogathon for Hurricane Relief, i didn't put up a link to N.Z. Bear's
Weblog Leader Board (which has tallied over $650,000 in contributions as of this writing.).
But, checking that leader board today, i was shocked to find that my name is on it, and that five of you have recorded your contributions with my blog as a reference! The total for annika's journal is $425!
It still amazes me that anyone even reads my bullshit, so i can't tell you how happy and grateful and proud i am, that in some small way this blog might be responsible for that kind of graciousness. Thank you so much! i think the Blogathon is clearly one of the true success stories to come out of this hurricane tragedy.
Let's keep it going!
Update: We're now up to $650!
Update 2: Wow, $1,150! You folks are incredible!
Remember that the crisis is not over. In fact, it's really just beginning. The population of a major city has picked up and scattered itself around the country. If you've ever lived on somebody's couch for an extended period, you know how unsettling that can be for all concerned. After a few weeks, these folks will really need the kind of help that charities like Catholic Relief can provide. So let's not forget about them, even if the media starts to lose interest.
Posted by: annika at
07:30 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Thanks to Roger:
http://powerlineblog.com/archives/011537.php
Posted by: Casca at September 03, 2005 02:26 PM (qBTBH)
2
Hey do you still have a catholic school girl outfit?
/just asking
Posted by: Kyle at September 03, 2005 02:48 PM (7PW/g)
3
reading other people's bullshit is what the blogosphere is all about!
hooray!
Posted by: nikita demosthenes at September 03, 2005 04:59 PM (Y3Wne)
Posted by: Mark at September 04, 2005 01:48 AM (qI3ib)
5
OK, Annie, you got me with that last one. I'm off to the Blogathon.
Posted by: shelly at September 04, 2005 03:26 AM (M7kiy)
6
OK, Buttheads. I've bumped our girl up a peg to the $650 mark. Can you do each do a little more and get her over $1,000.00? We are talking PRESTIGE here; gotta make her look better amongst her peers.
Go to it. You know what to do. Do it. Now.
Posted by: shelly at September 04, 2005 07:31 PM (6krEN)
Posted by: annika at September 04, 2005 08:30 PM (yvNb8)
Posted by: shelly at September 05, 2005 07:04 AM (ywZa8)
9
Shelly and Annika
You talked me into it.
Posted by: Jake at September 05, 2005 08:44 AM (r/5D/)
10
Thanks Jake. Don't forget to give Annie the credit on the roll...
You other wimps, step up to the plate.
By the way, I have taken to copying my posts before I send them, due to many being somehow rejected and not posted. Often, I have to post it a second time due to a failed attempt. Anyone else experiencing the revenge of Mu.Nu?
Posted by: shelly at September 05, 2005 08:56 AM (ywZa8)
11
I am giving locally (Houston) My church has taken in 200 refugees, and I have chosen to just give them money directly, That really cuts out the middleman.
We spent a lot of time over the weekend making baskets of sandwiches and bottled water.
Houston has taken in many many refugees, But I am worried about the long term. What happens when the emergency money is used up and the volunteers all begin to get on with their lives. Those people will still need homes and New Orleans wont be livable for a long time.
Posted by: Kyle at September 05, 2005 02:08 PM (GPyBL)
12
I gave through the matching program at work...but a little more to help out my favor blog couldn't hurt.
Posted by: jim at September 05, 2005 03:43 PM (lN8eP)
13
Kyle and Jim:
That;s fine. The idea is, where ever you gave doesn't matter; just log the amount and the charity in the website so she gets the credit.
If the charity is not listed, they will let you add it to the list.
Posted by: shelly at September 05, 2005 05:58 PM (ywZa8)
14
Has anybody tried donating to the Salvation Army on-line? I've tried unsuccessfully three times and I keep getting the same, undescriptive error message.
Posted by: Trevor at September 07, 2005 05:51 AM (RwZxT)
15
Hello Annie, Sorry I couldn't help you out here. My company has a wonderful matching charity thing so I gave there. I did have a beef I was wondering if anyone else felt. After watching the various ingrates in New Orleans complain about how heartless the rest of us are I wasn't thrilled at helping anyone out. But then I thought the Salvation Army (and the Catholic Charities) are going to do the right thing and help the people out so I got to get off the pot. Anyone else feel that way? In other words I gave in spite of the way these people acted.
Posted by: Drake Steel at September 07, 2005 12:14 PM (M2tSh)
16
i think its a mistake to generalize about all victims because of the idiocy of the media and those who are trying to deflect criticism of their own negligence. from a couple of credible sources, ive heard that the folks in houston now do not blame bush for what happened. remember these people were not watching the news last week. they do hwever blame nagin and blanco.
Posted by: annika at September 07, 2005 01:01 PM (t26R5)
17
Drake:
You don't give to Annie; just go to the site and record whatever you gave and to whom, giving her blog the credit. If your charity is not named, you can list it there as well.
Posted by: shelly at September 08, 2005 05:20 AM (M7kiy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 03, 2005
Malkin Quotes i Wish i'd Thought Of
"Poor Mike Myers. Look at his face. He looks like he's gonna hurl."
Nice one,
Michelle.
i wish i'd thought of that. The subtly obscure movie reference is supposed to be my bailiwick.
Posted by: annika at
10:01 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
September 02, 2005
Friends Of A Friend
i'm reprinting the following request by
Ken Wheaton in full. Please help if you can.
Understandably, sitting on the sidelines in New York and watching fellow Americans suffer is as frustrating as it is heart-breaking. Especially for those of us from Louisiana and living elsewhere, we want to do something more than just send money to the American Red Cross, with the vague sense of unease that it may get spent on a company car or a press release or a box of donuts at headquarters. And hopping in a rental car or on a plane is not only a direct violation of FEMA orders, but at this point, with gas as high as it is, it's prohibitively expensive, possibly dangerous and THAT money might be better spent on relief efforts.
So here's your chance to help one specific group of people. My friend Felicia, who you've read about in previous posts, is on a task force in St. Landry Parish, in Opelousas to be more precise. Opelousas, as many of you know, is my home town. There are currently a great deal of refugees who've ended up there--in the churches, in the shelters, in the Yambilee building, camping out in the parks--and they're going to need things.
For a closer look at what's going on in Opelousas and St. Landry Parish, check out The Opelousas Daily World.
So... Felicia is providing me and you with her home address. Care packages and checks specifically to help this group of people can be sent to her. Be sure to include a return address and your name.
St. Landry Katrina Relief
c/o Felicia Mouton
1022 Eddins Avenue
Opelousas, LA 70570
Things that are needed
Felicia says that while you can send clothes and food, those things are generally accounted for. Instead, she says, send
baby wipes, diapers, tampons, sanitary napkins, underwear, undershirts, Q-tips, cotton balls, dental floss, toothpaste, toothbrushes, deodorant, shampoos, soaps, etc....basically, anything you and I would by at Walgreen's for personal upkeep. These things are rarely thought of. The best way to purchase this kind of stuff is to actually in travel size so that individual packets can be given to people, and they don't have to share.
Also, anything for children, such as toys that don't necessarily have to be shared or want to be stolen, art paper, colors, coloring books, reading books...easy stuff. AND SCHOOL SUPPLIES! DON'T FORGET SCHOOL SUPPLIES!
In general, don't send anything worth money because in these type of shelters (well, in any that I've had to stay in/work in) things will be taken.
If you do want to send money, make checks payable to "Hurricane Katrina, St. Landry Parish Fund." From here on out, any money put into my PayPal account will go to this relief effort.
I would ask that anyone and everyone who reads my blog, who links to my blog, who has a home on my sidebar either contribute or at least provide a link to this post. Please. I'm begging here. Thank you all very much.
. . . Have a great Labor Day.
Posted by: annika at
07:14 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 507 words, total size 6 kb.
September 01, 2005
Hurricane Katrina: Blog for Relief Day
As you can see at the top of my sidebar, i have selected
Catholic Charities for hurricane relief donation. Here's why i like them.
Louisiana is heavily Roman Catholic and i expect that many victims will rely on the Church for all sorts of help.
The Catholic Church is 2000 years old, it ain't going anywhere.
As i posted on Monday, Catholic Charities emphasizes long term recovery aid, and this disaster recovery will take a long time.
Catholic Charities is a separate entity from local archdioceses, and therefore there's no danger that my money might possibly be skimmed to pay for any scandal settlements. i would be uncomfortable donating through my own local parish's collection basket for that reason.
You don't have to donate to my chosen charity, but i'd encourage you not to wait if you haven't helped out yet. Pick a charity from N.Z. Bear's, Instapundit's, The Cotillion (Jody's), or The Bear Flag League's list and do what you can today.
Technorati tags: flood aid, Hurricane Katrina
Update: My Cotillion sister Sadie at Fistful of Fortnights is auctioning off two blog designs from Apothegm Designs, to benefit the American Red Cross or the Hurricane oriented charity of your choice.
Posted by: annika at
11:59 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 213 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Nice Pic, Annie.
You look too good to be a lawyer. Better ugly down a bit.
Good pick on the relief charity. I could never give to the Red Cross, until they stop discriminating against the Red Mogen David and in favor of the Red Crescent.
Posted by: shelly at September 01, 2005 02:18 AM (6krEN)
2
By the way, what are you holding?
Looks like the Maltese Falcon to me.
Posted by: shelly at September 01, 2005 01:29 PM (ywZa8)
3
Yes, banners featuring gun-toting conservative uber-babes are always appealing.
Posted by: Attila at September 01, 2005 05:25 PM (lWN0C)
4
Nice pic, is that a tit I see obscured by your hand? She's holding a vibrator Shelly.
Posted by: Casca at September 01, 2005 06:18 PM (qBTBH)
5
BTW, how about the Get-Casca-laid-and-Drunk charity? Now THAT is a worthy cause.
Posted by: Casca at September 01, 2005 06:20 PM (qBTBH)
6
Casca, you need some serious therapy. You are a sick human being.
Have you considered self-immolation?
Posted by: shelly at September 01, 2005 08:54 PM (ywZa8)
7
Never crossed my mind, but then again, I've lived through the end of the world a couple of times. Truth is that we all die someday, and that there is good and evil on this spinning orb. If you dont' stomp evil out, it flourishes and overwhelms the good. I prefer to keep things light.
When Pinatubo blew up, I had cold beer every night AND got laid, mwahahahaha, and that was without electricity. It took me a couple of weeks to get the pumice out of my ass and lungs though.
Posted by: Casca at September 01, 2005 10:42 PM (qBTBH)
8
ya know for some reason catholic charities was the first one that sprung to mind for me, so I gave. now i see your post, and some good recent ones, and will give again. take care there annie.
Posted by: Scof at September 02, 2005 12:50 AM (ylwBl)
9
I, for one, have no problem believing Casca got a ton of pumice pounded up his ass. Anything to increase friction, I guess.
Posted by: Victor at September 02, 2005 04:56 AM (L3qPK)
10
Thanks for the mention, Annika, and we have our winners!
Posted by: sadie at September 03, 2005 11:15 AM (xV63t)
11
Annika,
Thank you for the post about Catholic Charities. They are an excellent organization to give donations to. The Archdiocese of New Orleans is now working out of Baton Rouge. Who better to give relief aid to than a group that knows the lay of the land and will do long term help. Many people think CCUSA only gives aid to Catholics, but they help everyone in need.
Peace!
Posted by: Jen at September 03, 2005 12:39 PM (7uozP)
12
thanks annika, because I read your blog, I did my share and contributed to Catholic Charities
Bo
PS my beautifull daughter's name is also annika, my wife was also born in Copenhagen.
I love your blog, and check it regularly. Please keep it up.
Posted by: boknows at September 04, 2005 07:33 PM (eejov)
13
Thank you so much!
ps. if your wife is from Copenhagen, and your daughter is annika, are you my dad?!
Posted by: annika at September 04, 2005 08:55 PM (yvNb8)
14
I live in northern Florida and we are home, albeit temporary to many of the diplaced folks from the gulf region. I have been volunteering at CC which is shouldering much of the burden of these 800 plus families we have in our very tiny little town. The task has been mammoth, but so has the support. I'm with you, it Catholic charities all the way. It's amazing the work they are doing. You have to see it in action to believe it. Thanks to you for the nod.
Posted by: ayekah at September 09, 2005 09:12 PM (17BDq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Competing Blogbursts
Just scooting around the blogosphere this morning i have seen quite a contrast in approaches to the Hurricane tragedy. One group of bloggers, a large one, led by
Hugh Hewitt among others, is concentrating on helping those in need. Another group of bloggers is holding another less organized blogburst, which can only be described as a "Blame Bush" blogburst.
Why am i not surprised.
Could this map provide a clue as to why certain bloggers don't seem to care about the victims of Hurricane Katrina?

Like they say, adversity reveals character. If the blogosphere is any indication, i think we're seeing a distinct revelation of character in the response to this disaster, and lack thereof.
It's all about priorities. Some see people in need, and their first thought is to ask "Who can I blame?" Others see a tragedy and immediately ask "How can I help."
Posted by: annika at
07:54 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I
found a bunch of "blame Bush" and "blame DOD" diatribes all over the place.
However, I did also find a "shoe on the other foot" episode, in which the President's plans to deploy troops in another country were opposed. The President, Clinton. The country, Kosovo. Gotta wonder how the Republicans feel about their theoretical reasons for opposing Kosovo, and how the left feels about supporting it.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at September 01, 2005 12:32 PM (PTRPR)
Posted by: SoCalPundit at September 01, 2005 04:07 PM (gS9+t)
3
Just when you think they cannot sink any lower, the left never lets you down. Now evil repubs are responsible for a hurricane.
Posted by: Kyle at September 01, 2005 04:21 PM (TL5pk)
Posted by: Pat at September 01, 2005 08:08 PM (Xafzf)
5
There IS a political component to all this. LA will swing Red now. No more Breau, Landreau, or that silly woman Guv they have. Well Breau may stick if he flips.
Posted by: Casca at September 01, 2005 10:46 PM (qBTBH)
6
"LA will swing Red now."
We've been swinging red for awhile now. David Vitter is just the beginning. Bobby Jindal was a bonus.
"Landreau"
I can't wait to get her fat Hillary-wannabe ass out of our Senate seat.
"or that silly woman Guv they have."
I didn't vote for her. Now, I know how the Bush haters feel because I still think she's a total dumbass that isn't qualified to lead our state. Why couldn't we have Governor Jindal instead?
Posted by: reagan80 at September 02, 2005 07:21 AM (+eJCK)
Posted by: reagan80 at September 02, 2005 05:19 PM (gBFkV)
8
Reagan80, while I agree with the gist of your statements, Vitter's so far struck me as pretty useless (and I say that even despite my inclination to give the benefit of the doubt to a fellow Tulane Law alum). But useless is better than outright harmful.
"Why couldn't we have Governor Jindal instead?"
You already know it's because Blanco 1) played the race card and 2) pulled off all sorts of sketchy and probably illegal stuff with the ballot boxes courtesy of various local friends. Is Jindal already officially running for Landrieu's Senate seat?
Posted by: Dave J at September 02, 2005 08:20 PM (8XpMm)
9
I'm sure Vitter will come through for us when we need him. I just hope that he doesn't jump on the Nagin bandwagon anymore.
"Is Jindal already officially running for Landrieu's Senate seat?"
No, but I'm not going to be surprised if he makes an attempt against her in the near future. He's gotten plenty of media exposure during his first year on the job, so he has potential. I heard that he was one of the main organizers of the GOP "purple fingers" after the Iraqi elections.
Anyway, I can't stand Blanco's broken campaign promises. She basically pledged to adopt a pseudo-Reaganomics economic program before her election, but she never cut taxes or state spending. All she did was whine about the lack of federal funding while she was busy trying to subsidize the damn SAINTS! Before Katrina, our economy was unravelling. She's done nothing to make our state attractive to industry or business besides offering subsidies(bribes?). Blanco makes me wish that a Libertarian would topple her in a coup to purge our state of the endemic big gov't and corruption.
Posted by: reagan80 at September 03, 2005 07:34 AM (17BnG)
10
A few notes on what's actually going on:
First, while places like Kos are heavy into the let's-find-responsibility-now game (which may have an eventual point, given that it will be imporant to figure out how to prevent this from happening again once things get cleaned up, though I agree that the energy may be a bit misplaced right now), there are plenty of right-wing blogs also doing nothing but spouting how Bush has done no wrong and pointing fingers anywhere and everywhere else, so there's plenty of misplaced crap going by from both sides.
That said, there's plenty of useful help being provided by both sides as well. http://www.hurricanehousing.org/ is a MoveOn project (which is about as left-wing as you can possibly get), a variety of left-wing blogs are posting links to donation sites, or holding drives, or offering personal rewards (a-la-Crooked Timber) for donations. While standing around and lambasting "the left" may make you feel better, I'd like to point out that it's absolutely no different from what you accuse "the left" of doing -- making a partisan attack instead of helping out.
I have a left-leaning blog (and my first few entries on the matter contained links to places where you can donate time or money). I also live in Baton Rouge. I spent my Friday helping a New Orleans refugee get fed and transported to the Baton Rouge Centroplex. Tomorrow I expect to be helping out at a shelter near LSU.
What were you doing? What will you be doing?
Posted by: Zed Pobre at September 03, 2005 06:33 PM (MqQ5F)
11
i can't remember a right leaning or libertarian blog i've visited in the last few days that hasn't mentioned charitable giving in some way. Most of the blogs on our side have something at the top of the blog.) Just for the hell of it, last Wednesday i decided to go through the list of Liberal Coalition blogs to see which ones had a link to some charity prominently displayed. (The Liberal Coalition includes mostly smaller blogs, not the biggies like Kos, etc. who have been very helpful raising money.)
First, out of 34 blogs i checked, 11 were out of business or hadn't posted since before the hurricane. Only three had a post that encouraged giving to a reputable charity, mostly the red cross. (Four others had links to some suspicious looking Liberal collection site, which was not a reputable charity, and had no information where the money was going to, or who set up the site. That leaves 16 members of the Liberal Coalition who had no interest in helping out the victims of this tragedy. Oh it's not that they don't mention the hurricane, they do, but you can guess what the focus of their blogging is.
Yes i know that by pointing this out i am making a partisan attack. But you are wrong when you say that it's "instead of helping out." My contribution may be small, but it is not nil. If pointing out a hypocrisy encourages some other bloggers to help spread the word, who wouldn't have otherwise, then i think it's okay.
Posted by: annika at September 03, 2005 11:26 PM (36JOf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 30, 2005
Cotillion For This Week
The wonderful
American Princess took it upon herself to do the whole Cotillion Ball this week. Having done one fourth of the hosting myself, i have to tip my hat to her, it is quite a task, and she did a great job. Go take a look at the best work from the members of the Cotillion
here. And if i may highlight one selection, please don't miss Beth's retelling of
her visit to Camp Reality in Crawford, Texas.
Posted by: annika at
08:51 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 87 words, total size 1 kb.
August 29, 2005
Something Wrong With Comments?
Some of you have emailed me with rejected comments. i don't know why they're being rejected, but it's not my doing and i have no control over the filter. It may have something to do with the recent mu.nu server problem and hopefully it will only be temporary. Feel free to email me with your compliments or vitriol, in the meantime.
Posted by: annika at
10:28 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The only major problem I've had is that your comments window never remembers my personal info. Aside from that, no problem.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at August 30, 2005 02:41 AM (TDwc6)
2
Who are you again? Do i know you?
Posted by: annika at August 30, 2005 07:19 AM (fGkPP)
3
Annie, I tried a few posts and all were rejected.
Let me know when this problem is fixed or you move from mu.nu.
Posted by: shelly at August 30, 2005 08:05 AM (M7kiy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 24, 2005
Mu.nu Back Up
Many thanks to
Beth,
Michelle and
Basil for allowing the free trackbacks and links while Mu.nu was down.
Since the blog was unavailable for most of Tuesday, i will extend the Final Jeopardy deadline until 11:59 p.m. Pacific time, Thursday night. Or until all players have submitted their responses. Right now, we're still waiting for Charlie, Skippy and Jasen.
For future reference, my old Blogspot blog will be my backup blog. You can find it at http://annikagyrl.blogspot.com/ or just google "blogspot annika."
Posted by: annika at
01:19 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 88 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'd like to shut down my Blogger site, but it still has roughly 2000 old posts. I can't transfer to MuNu more than 999 posts at one time (somehow I got to over 1200). Pixy knows about the problem but doesn't seem to know what to do about it. I've asked fellow Munuvians about how to get my categories to work, and with exception of one patient Canadian blogger, everyone either ignores you or just directs you to someone else whenever you have a problem or question. Then in the last 3 months, the servers have been shut down atleast 3 times.
Pardon me if I am not impressed.
Posted by: Mark at August 24, 2005 01:36 PM (Vg0tt)
2
Then there's Munuvians like Mark who, when handed $100, get angry because it's not $101. Whiner.
Posted by: Victor at August 24, 2005 05:21 PM (l+W8Z)
3
The pain is endless.
Go Google yourself.
Posted by: shelly at August 24, 2005 08:12 PM (M7kiy)
4
Welcome back. I was on vacation/business travel for three weeks and didn't read much of anything, and when I went to visit your journal, I ran into the munu problems. So I had to do my American Skankwoman research
all by myself. As Barbie would say, "American Skankwoman research is hard."
Again, welcome back. And I'd like to buy a vowel. (Oops, wrong game.)
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at August 25, 2005 08:21 AM (bGyIu)
5
It doesn't matter OE. You could win yet. The rules here are very flexible and as amorphous as the mind of a woman.
Posted by: Casca at August 25, 2005 08:36 AM (qBTBH)
6
So, Annika... the chickens come home to roost! We won't be hearing any more "Glogger" cracks in the future, will weeeeeeee? Having a paid site is no guarantee of reliability! Mooooo-ha ha ha ha!
Kevin
not really a Blogger advocate, but hoping to play one on TV
Posted by: Kevin Kim at August 26, 2005 06:31 AM (TDwc6)
7
I used to have a dog like Annika. Every couple of months, he'd disappear for a couple days at a time. Then he'd come back looking a little worse for the wear and tear. Cuts, hungover, once he had burn marks in his fur. I guess we've all been there. They say all the dogs in town look like him now. I never go back there.
Posted by: Casca at August 27, 2005 10:04 AM (qBTBH)
8
Casca, I had a cat just like that...Big Cat Stud was his name ("Stubby" to his friends). Once he disappeared for about a week and I figured he had been hit by a car. He came home, ate like a pig, then slept for two days straight. My roommate and I figured he was AFO'd.
Posted by: Victor at August 27, 2005 02:38 PM (l+W8Z)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 23, 2005
August 22, 2005
California Handgun Safety Certificate
i took the California Handgun Safety Certificate written test last weekend and passed with flying colors. That means that the State of California has deemed me worthy to purchase a handgun within the next five years if i so choose.
The test is so easy even one of Victor's rats could pass it (assuming that Victor has taught them how to read, as i'm sure he has). But the State of California still got 25 bucks out of me for the privilege of taking the test.
Publicola fisked the test's review booklet and showed how, despite the simplicity of the questions, even an expert can have trouble. This sample question seems to have tripped him up:
Hmmm. They have a self test.
'Safety Rule Number Two is keep
the gun pointed:
A. To the north.
B. In the safest possible direction.
C. Up.
D. Down.'
Well being a Southerner I gotta go with A. . . . we never really trusted those damn yankees . . .
Very funny.
Publicola was also nice enough to answer two questions i posed to him:
if Cali does not have the worst gun laws in the country, who does? and on a related note . . . Are there any decently industrialized nations that recognize the rights of gun owners similar to or better than the US?
You can read
his answers here.
Posted by: annika at
10:53 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 234 words, total size 2 kb.
August 20, 2005
Boomer Deathwatch
i discovered an interesting niche blog this morning,
Boomer Deathwatch. It's about that old Gen X - Boomer antipathy. i consider myself a Gen Xer, so i can relate to a lot of it. Here's an excerpt from the top post:
In the meantime, I worked minimum wage jobs and buffed up my political and social paranoia, built out of bits and pieces of leftover 60s radical rhetoric. Reagan was evil; Thatcher was a witch; the CIA pulled the strings; the Joint Chiefs of Staff and their counterparts at the Kremlin were glaring at each other over some future battlefield, wracked with nervous ticks and drenched with booze-soaked flopsweat, and one day they'd go too far and blow us all to kingdom come. There was no good or evil, or it was all evil, or we all had the potential for good. I don't know, it changed all the time, depending on what I was reading.
Then the 80s boom ended and the Wall fell and I finally got tired of being afraid and confused. More to the point, I got tired of letting fear and ignorance dictate how I saw the world, so I started reading books, some of which I didn't agree with at first. I stopped reading music magazines and started reading about economics, if only to find out just why all of the magazines I'd worked for as a freelance writer and photographer came and went in such regular cycles.
I was 'empowering myself'. Sure. Basically I was trying to peek my head up over the surging boomer crest ahead of me before the building echo wave behind me swept me down again. There had to be more to be seen or heard than the surging spectacle of sex, drugs and rock and roll that had been the backdrop for my whole life. If it looked like I'd never afford a house or a family, at least I wanted to know why I didn't die in a nuclear holocaust, or live in the Orwellian 'security state' of total surveillance and mind control that so many of my peers seemed to think was inevitable - indeed, already here, if you listened to many of them.
i was born later than the authors of this blog, so i don't have the same reference point they do on Carter, Punk, Disco, etc. (i read Douglas Coupland one night, yawned and promptly dismissed it.) But i get the whole "Boomers ruined it for us" meme.
i remember when Time ran that cover story about Gen X back in the eighties and it wasn't too flattering. And this whole shit storm erupted about whether Gen Xers were slackers, and why the Boomers were so bitter about the next generation.
Then the conflict seemed to die down, sometime in the late nineties perhaps. Boomers started to realize with their mortality staring them in the face, that their entire life could not be the big self-indulgent youth movement they thought it would be. And that Gen-Xers weren't all lazy cynics, and they didn't necessarily want or need to follow in the Boomers' footsteps either.
By the way, i recently saw The Big Chill for the first time on DVD. i'd heard so much about that movie that i figured i was missing out for having never seen it. i was wrong. i didn't miss a darn thing.
Posted by: annika at
08:18 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 566 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Absolutely, you missed nothing. Don't get me wrong, there was a lot of good entertainment from the 60's and 70's but there was even more crap.
I was on the tale end of the boomers. I graduated college in 1980. I saw all the selfindulgent, narcisstic dip weeds who were a little older than me and tried not to be like them.
I usually found myself working alongside younger people and so I developed an affinity to the Gen X crowd. I think Gen X'ers and the current crop of young people are so much more normal than the Boomer generations.
They were the most self absorbed, self destructive, and sheep like fad followers ever.
Posted by: Kyle at August 20, 2005 02:49 PM (4t42C)
2
The only thing that makes me a boomer is my age.
I don't know anybody who is remotely like a character in The Big Chill. I suspect they are as representative of most boomers as the cast of Real World is to most of today's college students.
I could easily slander my parents generation, who never hesitate to vote themselves bigger Social Security benefits out of the paychecks of their children. They were also the folks who won WWII. You'd have to go back to the Civil War to find Americans who sacrificed more.
I'd give the boomers some credit for improvements in Civil Rights, balanced against a lot of destructive, self indulgent behavior and the shameful betrayal of our Vietnamese allies. Does winning the Cold War count for anythinng?
The Big Chill is OK, but I'm more Animal House or American Graffiti.
Posted by: MarkD at August 21, 2005 07:04 PM (nQAo8)
3
Annika - for an interesting perspective on generations, read Strauss and Howe.
Generations: The History of America's Future
Posted by: Col Steve at August 21, 2005 11:01 PM (0sm0Z)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 17, 2005
Celebrating My Alliance-Versary
Two years ago last Monday, i joined the
Alliance of Free Blogs by posting a rousing call to arms which i'm reprinting below. Just cuz i like it.
To set the stage for those of you who don't remember the Great Blog War, it was Frank J of IMAO who whipped up a tongue-in-cheek battle* between him and Glenn Reynolds over something. i don't remember exactly what. But Frank came up with the idea for the Alliance and Susie and Harvey took it from there. After much hemming and hawing, i joined up in the following spectacularly pompous way.
more...
Posted by: annika at
08:10 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 931 words, total size 6 kb.
1
Running out of stuff to blog about, eh?
Posted by: Victor at August 17, 2005 08:16 AM (L3qPK)
2
hey victor, don't laugh, you were there at the beginning too.
Posted by: annie at August 17, 2005 08:23 AM (wSYlS)
3
I wish I could 111 visitors a day. Ingrates!
Posted by: M at August 17, 2005 08:27 AM (Vg0tt)
4
111 visitors per day? Wow, I'd be thrilled with that high of a number. I keep hitting my laptop like one does to a sticky gauge just to see if the count will go up. Up doesn't by the way.
Congrats by the way. There is a certain Bushian quality to your proclimation, that is quite endearing.
Posted by: Pursuit at August 17, 2005 08:46 AM (n/TNS)
5
So joining the Alliance and becoming assimilated into the munu collective seems to be the ticket to bloggy happiness and high hit counts.
I attribute most of my 30-40 readers/day to lost souls wandering in from a misguided Google search. Maybe if I became assimilated I could make the grand leap from being a lone blogger writing in obscurity, to becoming a member of a vast collective, writing in obscurity.
At the very least I could bypass the shame and humiliation inherent (given my moniker) in being called a "flappy bird" or an "adorable rodent" by the bear.
Posted by: Desert Cat at August 17, 2005 12:02 PM (1NG8F)
6
Desert Cat, if you'd like to come to Munuvia, say the word. I think annika and I could swing it.
Posted by: Victor at August 17, 2005 04:28 PM (l+W8Z)
7
Yah Cat. Resistance is futile.
Posted by: annika at August 17, 2005 05:54 PM (6etgS)
8
The formula for a high hit count seems simple... tits and ass. Need I say more?
Posted by: Casca at August 17, 2005 06:45 PM (qBTBH)
Posted by: Mark at August 18, 2005 07:26 AM (QhCTz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 16, 2005
Cotillion Ball
This week's
Cotillion Ball is a lot of fun.
RightGirl celebrates Elvis Presley,
A Mom And Her Blog stirs up a hurricane,
Mary Katharine Ham, who's been
all over the place lately, presents some Hollywood leading ladies, and
Not A Desperate Housewife shares some beauty tips, not that she needs any herself.
And finally, don't forget to check out the Bonfire Of The Vanities. i'm in it this "weak."
Posted by: annika at
09:25 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Great Cotillion Ball; it just made my morning to see Audrey Hepburn. With the exception of my wife--and, of course, Annika--she was the most beautiful woman ever to grace the world with her presence.
Posted by: Sub-Human at August 17, 2005 07:11 AM (yTuVc)
2
how sweet, sub-human, thank you.
Posted by: annika at August 17, 2005 07:50 AM (wSYlS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 10, 2005
August 05, 2005
Jeopardy On Another Channel
i have been remiss in not alerting you to Scorebard's Jeopardy game with a baseball/poetry theme over at
Humbug Journal. The game is ongoing right now, and while Scorebard was inspired by the game here, his clues are much harder. i haven't gotten one yet.
Posted by: annika at
08:01 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
August 02, 2005
Hans Island Fight
i think you all know who's side i'm taking in
this controversy.
Posted by: annika at
12:49 AM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just hope we notify the United Nations before anyone does anything. You know, "global tests" or something.
Posted by: Mark at August 02, 2005 02:12 AM (GVB1B)
2
My money is on Denmark. They ought to have a beer brew off to settle the dispute.
I volunteer to be an impartial judge.
Posted by: Kyle at August 02, 2005 03:39 AM (H5KE9)
3
This is unbelievable. The island just looks Canadian so it should go to Canada.
Simple.
Posted by: d-rod at August 02, 2005 05:59 AM (egNZz)
4
What are they gonna do? Have a slap fight?
Posted by: ken at August 02, 2005 07:41 AM (xD5ND)
5
I dunno about Denmark winning the brew off, there are some exceptionally good Belgian Style Beers that are brewed in Canada. Then again not everyone is in to Belgian Style Beers.
The other thing about this land dispute....no buses have been blow up.
Posted by: the Pirate at August 02, 2005 08:27 AM (SksyN)
6
i think its best to let the island belong to the people of the nations... dang! due to blobal warming countries are fighting for the north... lines are being drawn! that is why there's this dispure over a tiny island like Hans!!!
Posted by: maizzy at August 02, 2005 08:40 AM (t5V9d)
7
No, Pirate, but Garry Busey has blown up. Have you seen that dude lately? He must be like 300 lbs.
Posted by: annika at August 02, 2005 09:01 AM (FCQ/B)
8
If this comes down to a vote the Danes would automatically win one demographic. Any man who's been to Danmark and seen the women is not going to pick Canada.
Posted by: Trevor at August 02, 2005 09:42 AM (RwZxT)
9
I second Trevor's comments:
http://www.troniu.dk/index.php?c=1042
Posted by: Scof at August 02, 2005 09:47 AM (7z8ua)
10
Last time I saw Busey, other than on thesmokinggun.com, was the show on comedy central, where was fat and batshit crazy.
Posted by: the Pirate at August 02, 2005 10:57 AM (SksyN)
11
Annika, thank you for linking to us at Independent Sources. We simply cannot get off this incredibly fast paced, high action drama...CRISIS in the ARCTIC!
Posted by: Insider at August 02, 2005 11:35 AM (m9bOd)
12
Maybe they could, like, have a hockey game between two national teams to settle it, eh?
Posted by: tdothen at August 02, 2005 04:59 PM (sxki2)
13
I've known Busey since 1982 and he was certifiable then. Crazy is not new to him.
Nor is bloat. However, he looks recently like he's sucking on an air hose or something.
I sat next to him at the House of Blues ;ast year and he took up two stools, no kidding.
Out of work actors are dangerous to themselves...
But, he does play mean drums, under the name of Teddy Jack Eddy.
Posted by: shelly at August 02, 2005 08:09 PM (pO1tP)
Posted by: Mark at August 02, 2005 10:27 PM (rAsTq)
15
Shelly, you are one interesting guy.
Posted by: annie at August 02, 2005 10:46 PM (FmH7/)
16
To Kyle and the Pirat
Danes has created the worlds first open source beer (Our Beer). http://www.voresoel.dk/main.php?id=70
Doesn't that speen in our favour?
Posted by: Bubbling Minds at August 03, 2005 06:52 AM (6YJOJ)
17
My money is on Denmark, my homecountry. Wouldn't it be ironic though, if the island disappears by itself in a few years due to global warming and rising sealevels?
Posted by: Erik at August 06, 2005 02:10 AM (YQMeR)
18
Regarding global warming, see Bjorn Lomborg's "The Skeptical Environmentalist."
Posted by: Mark at August 07, 2005 02:18 PM (PjRZw)
19
I have actually read that book... seems like we have (almost) nothing to worry about...
Posted by: Erik at August 08, 2005 06:02 AM (UJE1d)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 01, 2005
Least Favorite People On The Right
Right Wing News had a poll of conservative bloggers to select the
"Least Favorite People On The Right." the results were:
1
Tom Tancredo (4)
1
Ralph Reed (4)
1
Newt Gingrich (4)
1
Lincoln Chafee (4)
1
James Dobson (4)
1
George Pataki (4)
1
Arnold Schwarzenegger (4)
14) Tom DeLay (5)
14) Rush Limbaugh (5)
14) George Voinovich (5)
14) Chuck Hagel (5)
13) Andrew Sullivan (6)
11) Tucker Carlson (7)
11) Bob Novak (7)
9) Sean Hannity (
9) Rick Santorum (
Arlen Specter (10)
7) Jerry Falwell (15.5)
6) Bill O'Reilly (16)
5) Michael Savage (17)
4) Pat Robertson (19.5)
3) Ann Coulter (20)
2) John McCain (21)
1) Pat Buchanan (2
i voted for Pat, and i'm glad to see he's number one. That guy is so anti-semitic, i can't believe they ever allow him on tv. Savage is an annoying freak. When he rants, he makes Buchanan seem reasonable. But while Savage is still a bigot, at least on the subject of Israel we see eye-to-eye.
i don't understand why so many people voted for McCain, Specter, Hagel, Voinovich, Chafee and Andy Sullivan. i thought the question was to vote for your least favorite person on the right. i didn't vote for them because it never crossed my mind that they were conservatives. McCain has his moments, but the rest of those people are to the left of Hillary Clinton. The new Hillary, that is.
My submissions were these guys:
The aforementioned Michael Savage and Pat Buchanan.
Jerry Fallwell and Pat Robertson who've done more to empower the ACLU than anyone in America. i added Dr. Dobson, who is the new Jerry Fallwell. He bugs the crap out of me. i heard him talk about the fillibuster controversy, and he really shouldn't ever talk politics. His grasp of constitutional history is at about eight grade level. i was like, "thanks for the effort doc, but we'll take it from here."
Rick Santorum. Bigot. Stuck his foot in his mouth too many times, and he'll continue to do so. If he get's nominated, say hello to America's first woman president.
Tucker Carlson, milquetoast. He's mis-labeled as a conservative, but he's an empty shell; the Alan Colmes of the right. Like Pat Buchanan he's a media darling because he's anti-war. Otherwise, nobody'd ever let him near a tv studio because he's un-watchable. Un-watchable.
Bob Novak, never liked him. Yah, i know he's a legend, but his best days ended before i was born. And i'm saying this totally exclusive of the whole Plamegate involvement thing. He pretty much mails it in nowadays. Much like i do on this here blog.
My last choice was kind of mean, but what the hell: Paul Harvey. He's like that old crotchety grampa that you love to death, but somebody should really take the keys away; you know what i mean? Don't get me wrong, i'm glad Paul Harvey's out there because a lot of people get their politics solely from his little blurbs. But i started changing the channel when i hear him on the radio. Too many times i got pissed at myself for wasting three minutes of my precious radio listening time with that bs.
And now you know the rest of the story.
Good day.
Posted by: annika at
07:37 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 560 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Can't disagree with anything you have written. Well done.
Posted by: Jake at August 01, 2005 08:02 AM (r/5D/)
2
Why was the "New" Hillary left of this list? She would have been a lock for Numero Uno.
P.S. I loved the long pause; how poetic...
Posted by: shelly at August 01, 2005 08:14 AM (pO1tP)
3
I think it's sad that your choices and the choice of so many others are right-wingers that are bad because they're "too right-wing." Why not put the moderates up there; so-called right-wingers like George W.
As for Pat on Israel, he's a fierce critic, but that's better than the dual-loyalty-freaks like Kristol and Krauthammer that see no distinction of interests whatsoever, for whom a sacrificial war on Israel's behalf is a good thing in their minds. Washington warned against this sort of thing. Why are we still sending them billions after the cold war ended; isn't this kind of silly?
Posted by: Roach at August 01, 2005 08:32 AM (MRlvg)
4
I don't necessarily agree with a lot of your choices, but the long pause.... good day made me fall out of my chair laughing. And it's impossible to say that and not upspeak it in his old man voice.
Posted by: Charlie Gordon at August 01, 2005 09:21 AM (D3+20)
5
Heh... I had exactly the same thought re: McCain and
being on the right. That's partly what gave me fits about coming up with a list of my own. A lot of the people I came up with were either extremists or milquetoasts.
Nice job.
Posted by: Cassandra at August 01, 2005 11:21 AM (eKdAq)
6
OMG. Even funnier. I didn't read your whole post.
I
loathe Tucker Carlson, and "milquetoast" is the exact word I would have used to describe him.
Too funny. I have GOT to stop multi-tasking...
Posted by: Cassandra, snarking from the sidelines at August 01, 2005 11:23 AM (eKdAq)
7
Bob Novak, never liked him. Yah, i know he's a legend, but his best days ended before i was born.
thanks for summarizing my life,
annie.
Posted by: louielouie at August 01, 2005 11:34 AM (xKfMm)
8
Interesting choices, Annie. Paul Harvey has bugged the shit out of me since I started listenting to talk radio as a kid. I hate it when he goes from story to commercial without any sort of transition. The only thing worse is that now his kid is trying to imitate him----silly old-man voice and all.
Savage is just too much. Even when I agree with his message, I'm turned off by the delivery. If I'm going to listen to a cultural conservative, I much prefer Michael Medved: smart, precise, and polite.
I'm absolutely with you on Dobson, Fallwell, and Robertson. Please guys, stick to Christian radio and stop embarrassing us. Dobson is actually fairly interesting and knowledgable when he sticks to his area of expertise.
Posted by: Blu at August 01, 2005 12:59 PM (j8oa6)
9
WOW! where to begin. Coulter and Savage are simply hate mongers, they are embarrasing. Buchanan can be dismissed because he has lost almost all of his influence.
As for politicians, I think you will always find some people who dislike a particular issue or two.
I dont dislike McCain, but I think he is an overambitious media whore, and that little McCain-Feingold run around the first amendment is not cool. Besides, he has tiny little T-Rex hands.
I like Tucker Carlson, his new show is fairly entertaining. Sure he dosent mix it up, thats not his style, but he gets his point across.
As for the religious conservatives, The media will always go after the most obnoxious one for sound bites, nothing you can do about that.
Posted by: Kyle at August 01, 2005 02:55 PM (H5KE9)
10
Lighten up a little, please. Ann Coulter is way over the top, but funny. Just tune out the excess. Watching a liberal swallow his/her tongue is amusing.
I have no idea why Hannity and Gingrich made this list.
Chafee, Pataki, Schwartzenegger, Voinovich, Hagel, Sullivan, and O'Reilly are on the right? I must be out of the mainstream.
McCain gets my vote. The man's a hero and an idiot.
Posted by: MarkD at August 01, 2005 03:35 PM (nQAo8)
11
i can't figure McCain out. The man's a legitimate hero, but he loves being a Senator more than representing his constituency. i also agree that Coulter is unfairly criticized. She's a humorist, and a good one. No one should take her too seriously.
Small hands are usually a warning sign though. Of what is anyone's guess.
Posted by: annika at August 01, 2005 03:44 PM (zAOEU)
12
So how long are you going to keep throwing gas on the fire to boost controversy? Why not just lift the shirt the rest of the way?
You're wrong, Pat isn't an anti-semite. It's pathetic when you can't criticize AIPAC and the influence that Israel has in our international policy without being called a Nazi.
Finally... remember Ronald Reagan's eleventh commandmant. Unless you're talking about Spectre, then the gloves are off.
Posted by: Casca at August 01, 2005 06:55 PM (qBTBH)
13
Casca, James Bond (the Connery one i think) took care of
Spectre a long time ago. Get with the program.
Posted by: annika at August 01, 2005 07:26 PM (UV8Xg)
14
Ya know, Arlen's been lookin' a little like Blofeld lately......
Posted by: reagan80 at August 01, 2005 07:43 PM (zqYP3)
15
i never thought of that until now, but he does look a little Donald Pleasance-ish. All he needs is a scar and a cat.
Posted by: annika at August 01, 2005 08:12 PM (UV8Xg)
16
Agreed on most everything, but I'm still not sure how Santorum's a "bigot." Why is it when Christian/Catholics have strongly held views, they're deemed "bigots"? Edumacate me here, someone.
McCain = RINO.
Tucker Carlson looks like he was conceived in a petri dish.
Coulter is amusing and intelligent, but her emotions tend to control her, and she defines TACTLESS. She cares nothing for who she offends, or how she offends them. I do admire her to a point, but it's a matter of minutes when she talks before I cringe in agony.
I've never heard Savage on the radio, but the titles of his books scream "I am a lunatic."
Buchanan is just unlikeable. Doesn't matter what he says, he's just not very nice, not very interesting.
Posted by: Mark at August 01, 2005 11:12 PM (SCyTi)
17
I never gave Paul Harvey a second thought until a couple of years ago. When Mt. Lemmon outside of Tucson was burning, he mentioned it on his show and blithely got several important facts quite wrong. Then shortly thereafter he unloaded some misleading BS about Salvia divinorum. So I have no confidence whatsoever now that he's really giving me "the r-r-r-rest! of the story", and not some dressed up tripe that just sounds good on the radio.
And you already know how I feel about McCain.
Posted by: Desert Cat at August 04, 2005 12:06 PM (n/TmV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
115kb generated in CPU 0.0899, elapsed 0.133 seconds.
73 queries taking 0.1087 seconds, 296 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.