July 29, 2005
Funny Cuz It's True
Check
this out. lol
!a natural reaction to the self induced and largely imaginary pressures of blogging . . . an undertaking which was totally voluntary and which does not directly contribute to his or her continued survival, on this, our planet earth.
Via
Dawn.
Posted by: annika at
09:27 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: 420 at July 29, 2005 10:50 AM (7z8ua)
2
Who said its not a vital function?
Posted by: Kyle at July 29, 2005 02:52 PM (7Re84)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 26, 2005
Condoms And The Beaver
This is hilarious. Via
The Cotillion.
By the way, this week's hostesses for the Ball are: Sadie (warning: femme fatale alert), Beth (warning: sticky fingers alert), Claire (warning: shoe fetish alert), and Denita (warning: Sweet lyrics alert)
Posted by: annika at
10:45 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
July 21, 2005
London Deja Vu
Good coverage over at
Anubis.
No casualties, thankfully.
Posted by: annika at
07:43 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The whole thing is very odd. Amateurish copycats?
Posted by: Hugo at July 21, 2005 01:20 PM (Qst0d)
2
I would certainly be freaked out, with two major events in two weeks.
(Off topic, but I requested your wisdom over at my blog today...)
Posted by: Sarah at July 21, 2005 01:36 PM (5JemA)
3
Good coverage? That was GREAT coverage! Better than we got on the radio in Southern California. After trumpeting that they were going to cover Tony Blair live, KFI broadcast maybe two minutes of it. I switched to KNX, which broadcast maybe another minute or so. I figured I'd try KVCR, the San Bernardino NPR affiliate, but they were prattling on about something else.
It was good to see the UK and Australia participating in a joint conference. If nothing else, this reminds the world that this is not just a war against the US.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at July 21, 2005 05:09 PM (bGyIu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 20, 2005
Tragedy Tomorrow... Poetry Tonight
[That's a Cole Porter reference, by the way.]
i'll be busy again today, so look for poetry tonight.
In the meantime, read this fantastic post from Baron Bodissey at Gates of Vienna.
Posted by: annika at
06:59 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's time for a Kipling discovery. When you choose classic subjects, and you're right, you become timeless. Try "Gods of the Copybook Headings".
Posted by: Casca at July 20, 2005 09:27 AM (Qlvb9)
2
Or "The Dane-Geld" (which could be updated for today as "The Moor-Geld").
Thanks for the link!
P.S. I thought that was Stephen Sondheim...
Posted by: Baron Bodissey at July 20, 2005 10:15 AM (GMXzJ)
3
hey, call me crazy, but please don't write any the words "tragedy tomorrow." your blog might be the root cause for london! you got witchy powers.
Posted by: ken at July 21, 2005 02:53 PM (xD5ND)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 19, 2005
The Cotillion Costume Ball
What an honor it is to host this week's
Cotillion Ball, along with
Dr. Sanity,
RightGirl, and Beth of
My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
Week in and week out, i am amazed at the talent to be found in the links of the Cotillion Ball, and this week is no different.
At my corner of the Ball, a costume theme in honor of our friends and allies, the people of Great Britain. And in honor of these grand ladies of the blogosphere, enjoy a little bit of British fashion history while you peruse the links.
While we're talking fashion, Holly of Soldiers' Angel is providing cute barefoot sandals and her original artwork out of the generosity of her heart to members of the military. She's given away over 200 miniature paintings so far, and has received many gracious thank-yous from servicewomen who appreciate a gift of somthing girlie.
In the "great minds think alike department," i was happy to find a kindred spirit in Jody of Steal the Bandwagon on the subject of the death penalty. Jody explains her change of heart regarding that touchy subject thusly:
At first it sounds great. Sure, you have so little regard to human life to take someone elseÂ’s life? Fine. Say hello to Mr. Sparky. And for most of my life this is how I have regarded the death penalty.
But I am beginning to wonder if putting to death anyone can fit into my personal ideology. I am adamantly against abortion and euthanasia. The act of willfully taking anotherÂ’s life devalues human life. The story last [year] regarding the newborns being euthanized in a Dutch hospital made me shudder. Imagine where life is so unvalued that a doctor is allowed to take it?
Like Jody, it was also the
Groningen Protocol story, along with Terri Schiavo's death that made me seriously question my support for the death penalty. i just don't know anymore if human beings and human institutions can be trusted with the power to decide who lives and who should die.
Zendo Deb of TFS Magnum found a site that has some very interesting and provocative information about self-defense, along with some cool graphics. Check out "Two ways to shield yourself from a violent attack." It's an effective way to get across a very simple yet important message. Go visit Deb and follow her link to A-Human-Right.com. Ladies especially should pay close attention to the page entitled "Stay Safe."
Michigander E. M. Zanotti of The American Princess thinks a man named Ted might be a good choice to replace governor Jennifer Granholm. No, not Kennedy... Ted Nugent.
No. I am not kidding.
Yes, sir. The Nuge, the Motor City Madman, may be throwing his camouflage cowboy hat with the real 'coon tail into the ring to take on the Moled Wonder.
. . .
Not that the Nuge isn't qualified, he's written for more than 40 publications and is author of 'God, Guns and Rock nÂ’ Roll,' 'Kill It and Grill It' and the newly released 'BloodTrails II.' HeÂ’s serving his fourth term on the National Rifle AssociationÂ’s board of directors, and is president of the Ted Nugent United Sportsmen of America. And if that wasnÂ’t enough, his No. 1 voted hunting show 'Spirit of the Wild' on the Outdoor Channel. He's the national spokesman for D.A.R.E. and he's got a solid political outlook . . .
And let's not forget how he warned America about the dangers of Cat Scratch Fever, so many years ago. i'd vote for him.
i already alerted you to The Anchoress's blog post about the 1999 ABC News report that, quite beyond belief, completely contradicts the standard MSM line about any pre-war connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq. This post is the type of stuff that makes The Anchoress one of those blogs you should check daily as you're taking that first sip of coffee.
The same is true for Fausta's Bad Hair Blog. She implores us to focus like a laser beam on the real scandal confronting us all:
There is ONE, and I repeat, ONE pressing issue of our times: we are at war. Not a 'little' war in a far-away place, but an assault on all civilisation The Democrats simply don't have a clue as to what to do about that.
And that's the real scandal.
Absolutely. Fausta also forsees a change in France. Who is this man
Nicholas Sarkozy, and can he save the Republic?
Denita of Who Tends The Fires describes what it's like to live along the Gulf Coast during hurricane season.
All along the Coast a person can see the legacy of numberless hurricanes. No structure is without its scars and replaced siding, with holes pocking the window frames where plywood was hastily thrown up to protect the glass. Only those houses that were built during the more peaceable Winter are pristine and untouched--and it's a sure bet that they'll no longer be virginal within a couple years.
Also (if we can talk fashion again for a moment) do go over to Denita's friend
Sandra's eBay shop. Mention Denita and get a $3 discount!
Children are not luggage. That may seem like an obvious point, but some folks apparently need to be reminded of the child/luggage dichotomy. Beth at Yeah, Right, Whatever has the details.
Imagine for a moment that you're a mom with a dilemma. You have to get your kids to their dad's home several states away. Your car will not fit them all. What do you do?
Here's a hint- you DON'T put your kids in the frickin' trunk!
Amazing what some people think is proper parenting these days.
2004 Weblog Award winner and Cotillion blogger Kate of Small Dead Animals is a great place to get a conservative's perspective on Canadian politics. Mary Katharine Ham of Townhall.com shares a great bit of family history involving the mighty 8th AAF. And pretty much everything at Villainous Company is always worth linking to; here she exhorts WaPo columnist Richard Cohen to stop lying.
i hope you enjoyed the Ball. Please go check out the rest of the links at Dr. Sanity's, RightGirl's, and Beth's
Posted by: annika at
12:36 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1026 words, total size 9 kb.
1
I have always looked at support for the death penalty (for murderers) as being an affirmation of Life. You see, I respect life so much I want to give the ultimate punishment to those who take it. Otherwise you are belittling the life of the victem.
Or to put it in another way; Sympathy for criminals is the same as contempt for their victems.
However, I am willing to compromise and permenantly do away with the death penalty. But only if DP opponants go along with this compromise: we take all death row inmates and they get only the one appeal unless NEW evidence shows up, then we send them to the Gulag, somewhere in the artic Islands, they exist with only what is needed for life, and they never come out.
Unsurprising, I have never met a lefty who is willing to take this compromise. That is because they love criminals. Dont go getting soft on us.
Posted by: Kyle at July 19, 2005 03:24 AM (7Re84)
Posted by: Fausta at July 19, 2005 06:30 AM (Hf7u/)
3
I've poured a bottle of cheap rum in the punchbowl. Which one is the sluttiest?
Posted by: Casca at July 19, 2005 07:03 AM (Qlvb9)
4
The Nuge is great, but I don't think he's electable -- especially in Michigan's urban centers. Ann Arbor and Detroit would positively lose their minds over a Nugent candidacy ('though I'm sure he'd do well in the U.P. and the more rural parts of the L.P.). He doesn't have Arny's fame to pull him through, and his ideas are much further-out -- and better-documented -- than Arny's.
Still, it's a fun idea. I'd give just about anything to hear the Nuge perform
Wang, Dang, Sweet Poontang at the inauguration.
Posted by: Matt at July 19, 2005 07:37 AM (10G2T)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 14, 2005
This Blog Has Two Audiences
Want a laugh? Go check out the comments to what has become my most popular post ever:
"My E-Mail To L!nds@y Loh@n."
Lately, every couple of days someone has been commenting to that post. i guess google searches for L!nds@y have increased since the Herbie movie came out, and my site pops up as the number seven result in a search for the sudden waif's e-mail address.
Most of the people who arrive and comment do not seem to have a clue, and think that i am either L!inds@y herself, or a close friend of hers. It's funny. For instance, this chick thinks L!nds@y is in the habit of giving her phone number out to random strangers:
Dear Lindsay or whoever is reading,
Hey, what's up? I would like to know more about Lindsay Lohan. If anyone know her phone no & e-mail or one of them pls give it to me.If this e-mail reads it lindsasy lohan ,can u give me your phone no & e-mail pls. Thanks . Bye
Strange.
Here's someone who took my satirical post way too seriously.
u honestly think Lindsay would respond to that.. and wat makes u think tht by telling her u noe a cool guy shes gonna care.
Well, my post may have been satire, but i wasn't lying when i said that L!nds@y would totally dig on
Ken Wheaton, if she only met him.
My post has become a discussion board of sorts for a totally different audience, most likely international, and very obviously young. i am beginning to worry about the state of English language education in the world, now that i've seen a sampling of what passes for spelling and grammar.
well i thing lindsay is the best actris in the world .and herbie fully loaded is the greatest movoe i ever saw. all the movies of linsay i h ave saw but i just want to know if anybody has her email adress i will be great to have it thanks bye
Crikey! i have to admire anyone with the intestinal fortitude to sit through the entire L!nds@y
oeuvre. What fascinating conversations one might have. i imagine they might go like this, for instance:
"i love how the auteur combines editing and cinematography in idiosyncratic ways as a commentary on outmoded concepts of "reality" [here make the "quote" gesture with fingers] utilizing both the explicit and implicit narrative meanings in the film Freaky Friday."
"Oh yes, but the subtlety of The Parent Trap is at once delicious and painful as an expression of ambivalent attitudes toward the ideological issue of violence, drawing upon conventions of cinematic realism to characterize the plot structure and mise-en-scene exposition of theme and characters."
"Exactly. I wept."
But most of the comments contain the same question: "How can i get in touch with L!nds@y?" Since i have been silent on the matter, as i can't answer that question, other commenters have offered their advice.
I have several adresses thay all clame to be lindsays I emailed her about amillion times I have mary kate and ashleys but who knows if they are real.
Now there's a question i
can answer. They are
not real. All four are fake. And spectacular, from what i hear.
Posted by: annika at
07:19 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 537 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I wood rathar have Sandra Bullocks email if u r the one who has that kinda stuff. Do you like work with the stars?
Too Funny. The strangest search phrase I've been found by is, "dog ate my homework image".
I guess the Sandra Bullock reference gives away the fact I'm not a teeny-bopper female. For that matter, so does using teeny-bopper.
Your site always makes me smile. Thanks.
Posted by: Jim at July 14, 2005 07:58 PM (ponKd)
2
Shit, your site always gives me a hard-on, no wait, that's Roger's site... so how about Sandra Bullocks number?
Oh yeah, Mary Kate and Ashley... after they swallow, they barf it back up... ruins the whole thing.
Posted by: Casca at July 14, 2005 08:16 PM (qBTBH)
3
You are just too funny.
Posted by: Brad at July 14, 2005 11:41 PM (Qz3ul)
4
Jim, I live just a couple of blocks over from Sandra B. I don't know her email address, but I guess I could always drop something directly into her mailbox (if I were in anyway a fan of hers...I'm not...too nasally and whiney with no breadth or variety to her acting ability)
Annie, I have two diff. posts on Ashless Simpson (one on her Super Bowl fiasco, the other on a petition to ban her from every singing again), and both of them elicit the same types of teeny-bopper comments as your LL posts...
Posted by: Robbie at July 15, 2005 06:05 AM (lbWbV)
5
Annika, is this really worth a few hundred hits?
Posted by: Mark at July 15, 2005 08:46 AM (Vg0tt)
Posted by: dawn summers at July 15, 2005 10:48 AM (ZyabD)
7
C'mon, annika! You're in California! Lindsay's in California! Don't you two know each other?
Posted by: Victor at July 15, 2005 12:58 PM (L3qPK)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at July 17, 2005 10:49 AM (Hn8NG)
9
Didn't Paris have Lindsay's number?
Completely off topic - a year ago, our church's high school youth group went to Florida. When the other groups found out that our group was from California, they asked our group if they surfed. Finally, one of our group wrote "I surf to school" on his backpack. The guy lives in Rancho Cucamonga, which is in the 909, fifty miles away from any beach.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at July 18, 2005 11:16 PM (A0qGO)
Posted by: Patriot Xeno at July 20, 2005 10:41 AM (LPdru)
11
Call me
evil. I even adopted Jim's favorite word "teeny-bopper." However, I left off the dash, which will probably cause a flame war even worse than the Lindsay-Britney battles.
When I was 9 or 10 years old, our class was assigned to interview someone. Two of us in the class decided that we would interview President Richard Nixon. To this day I don't know why we didn't get the interview. (Actually, one student did interview the Arlington, Virginia Superintendent of Schools. But Paris Hilton didn't know him.)
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at July 21, 2005 01:05 PM (c6rOB)
12
I totally agree. That is exactly how I understand it.I am very lucky to get this tips from you
neon signs wholesale. Great! Thanks for sharing will be sure to follow this blog regularly
Business Signs. WOW! this is awesome
LED neon sign! you can download it at my website for FREE along with lots of other games and media content
LED Signs. I look forward to more updates and will be returning.Cheers!
Posted by: Advertising signs at January 21, 2011 02:57 AM (zpIH7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 13, 2005
Poetry Day Update
i will be pretty busy today, so Poetry Wednesday will be posted later today.
Meanwhile, check out some of the great blogs on my sidebar. Like Little Miss Attila, who wrote something recently that i can totally relate to:
as I tick down the list of things I'm interested in: cars, trains, guns, military strategy. Motorcycles.
I'm clearly not a middle-aged woman, but rather a 16-year-old boy trapped in a middle-aged female body.
i hear ya, girl. My list includes airplanes, military history, sports, action movies, and science fiction. i should have been a boy.
Posted by: annika at
08:12 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 99 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We are opposite images of each other, Annie. I love airplanes, but not military ones. (I read Airliner magazine, because I'm fascinated with airlines and airports, not jet fighters). I love sports, but tend to be drawn most to cycling, running, stuff like that. And I love cute little animals and have never ridden motorcycle.
Little Miss Attila is one of the few other conservatives I read.
Posted by: Hugo at July 13, 2005 10:02 AM (qldcl)
2
No, no, no to boyhood. God intended that ass as a gift to man.
Posted by: gcotharn at July 13, 2005 10:55 AM (3Bn47)
3
Liar. You're over at Manolo's drooling over
these.
Posted by: Victor at July 13, 2005 12:44 PM (L3qPK)
4
Just wondering...have many people attempted to dissuade you from pursuing these interests because of your gender?
Posted by: David Foster at July 13, 2005 12:53 PM (7TmYw)
5
Good question David. i would say nobody. i got my love for sports science and airplanes from my dad. My love for action movies from my bro. and i got interested in military history thanks to some really good teachers in high school and sixth grade.
Posted by: annika at July 13, 2005 06:27 PM (ukN8u)
6
I wondered, but was afraid to ask her what Attila the Hub thinks of the possibility of being married to a 16 year old boy.
Posted by: Desert Cat at July 13, 2005 08:11 PM (xdX36)
7
HEH! my wife has all the same interests, except that she also collects porcelain fairies.
Posted by: Kyle at July 14, 2005 04:15 AM (7Re84)
8
Kyle, I never thought of you as porcelin.
Posted by: Casca at July 14, 2005 06:11 PM (qBTBH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 12, 2005
Cotillion Ball
This week's
Cotillion Ball, highlighting the best women bloggers around (minus one), is being hosted at the following wonderful sites:
Feisty Repartee
Sisu
Villianous Company
Sissy Willis describes the Cotillion like this:
Then there are the Ladies of the Cotillion. Hold the door for one of them as a courtesy, and she'll flash you a dazzling smile. But sign her dance card, and you'd better have your wits about you. She adores a rousing debate at least as much as a fling around the dance floor and does not suffer fools gladly. The blogosphere is littered with the corpses of lesser word warriors' debating points.
Get in on the
Instalanche.
And speaking of -lanches, Hello to all Rodger fans!
Posted by: annika at
08:05 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks for the lovely mention, annika.
Posted by: Sissy Willis at July 12, 2005 09:59 AM (IzODM)
2
Annika:
If you learned the Viennese Waltz, you too would be invited to the Cotillion Ball.
Posted by: Jake at July 12, 2005 05:35 PM (r/5D/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 11, 2005
Trudeau Bitchslap
Old media cartoonists should know better than to talk smack about the blogosphere. The consistently readable Varifrank delivers a
well-deserved bitchslap to Gary Trudeau and a whole demographic.
thatÂ’s ok Gary. My generation will be here after yours is soon gone to write the legacy of your lives. That is our revenge. We get to be the ones to tell your tale. And I do admit your generation did do one thing right, it created the internet.
Thanks man! You just gave the power of the press, once just reserved for people like yourself, to average wingnuts like me. "Power to the people" isnÂ’t that how the song used to go? Well here it is baby!, only it seems that your generation really didnÂ’t mean "power to the people" it really meant "power only to people who think just like us". Whoopsie Daisy! I guess that didnÂ’t work out quite like you planned either. Is there anything your generation worked on that did work out? Well, yeah, The Internet. Now chock full of those people you and your cartoon now decry as 'unemployed losers'. Its funny the way you say it just like your parents called the people in your generation "in need of a haircut and a bath".
And my generation is now exploiting the internet. Did I say "Exploit"? Shall we call it what it is? Let's call it a revolution!( quick, get that Beatles record, whereÂ’s that "you say you want a revolution"- I so want to rip that to an MP3 and provide a link right here.) And since were throwing metaphors around, Those "barbarians at the gates" that you are hearing? Those "barbarians" are people like me, who can reach more people in an afternoon than you could do in the first 10 years of your underground 'fighting against the man' career. Only we arenÂ’t underground, were that 'evil middle class' America you railed so much about when you still had hair on your head and not in your ears. Thanks to your generation, we donÂ’t have to go through people you to talk to each other any more. We control the means of production comrade.
The 'silent majority' just got High Speed Wireless Broadband baby, and if you were part of my generation, youÂ’d know what that meant.
i know a lot of people who stopped reading Doonesbury back in the eighties. i'm proud to say i never read that shit.
Varifrank, on a roll now, continues:
We donÂ’t think America is a bad place. We think its a pretty damn nice place. We cant help but notice the people that risk their lives to come here are all smiling when the arrive, almost as if they were happy to be here. Imagine that! Perhaps they havenÂ’t been reading your cartoon or listening to Air America. Maybe if we put Al Franken on the Air in Tijuana, that might stop the illegal immigration problem( oh if only we could warn them Gary, if only...) We donÂ’t need to translate Air America to Spanish, the language of the upper class yellow coward is universal around the world. The only people we see in this country who stagger around unhappily are ones with the Kerry/Edwards bumper stickers on their cars. Maybe the new car smell in Volvos isnÂ’t quite as country fresh as it is in our hummers...
We donÂ’t think the military are baby killers. We honor our troops, We honor the past, We honor the dead. We respect the living. My generation didnÂ’t need a draft, it volunteered! 'Greatest Generation'? Well, we think that gene skipped a generation. Your generation wants to lay prostrate at the feet of those who killed innocent people in Manhattan, wants to equate Mohammed Attas soldiers in Guantanmo to the likes of Martin Luther King in a Birmingham jail. This generation has given its life to go kill those who killed us and to help spread the liberty of democracy, yes - I said it, liberty , Democracy AND YES, FREEDOM to those who are enslaved. Your generation sneers at the very idea of such a thing. Your generation thinks the only thing the world needs to be liberated from is us. You think that because some of us donÂ’t want to have our tax money go to 'piss christ' that we donÂ’t have freedom, while women who were shot in the back of the head for kite flying in Afghanistan wonder just what the hell your generation is talking about.
Insert "not all baby-boomers are leftists" disclaimer here. Of course, the generation that gave us the "make love not war" slogan does have an unfortunate reputation to live down.
i really believe that a lot of liberal mischief is the result of an ill-conceived nostalgia for the sixties. The press believes that their high water mark was toppling Nixon. When in fact, Nixon toppled himself. But they desparately want to do it again. And to the old media, if truth gets in the way, fuck the truth. They want another Nixon.
The anti-war left is the same way. Young activists, trained in the crucible of our universities by former hippies who think they "stopped the war, man," want nothing more than to do it again. Never mind that Nixon stopped the war, not the activists. (As Michael Medved is fond of pointing out, the giant anti-war demonstrations all but evaporated after Nixon ended the draft. Even as the war continued.)
Listen, i went to Berkeley. If there's one drumbeat that you hear all through undergrad there, it is this: Make a difference. Sounds great, but the thrust of that imperative is limited and obvious once you spend a few semesters there. "Making a difference" is narrowly defined not as "having a family," "raising good children," or "contributing to society in a constructive way." It's defined as a blind opposition to anything traditional. "Tear it all down, man."
Trouble is, that sentiment is in itself traditional. Yes, traditionally Marxist.
Link via Dymphna at Gates of Vienna.
Posted by: annika at
10:53 AM
| Comments (21)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1007 words, total size 6 kb.
1
I apologise for the unecessary painting of all boomers as leftists. I was "in a mood" that day. Just so you know, I too am a boomer ( 1961!)and the biggest rightwinger I ever met was from gamma phi beta in Berkeley.
Again ,sorry for the froth...
Posted by: Frank Martin at July 11, 2005 11:20 AM (BIwsj)
2
I'm a big Frank fan, and had read this a few days ago. I had been considering a "I hate boomers" post, and after reading Frank's, I just crossed it off my list. He said it all, and he said it well.
Frank by the way, I would have commented but I needed to "sign-up". So thanks to our bud here for the open comments.
Posted by: Pursuit at July 11, 2005 12:37 PM (n/TNS)
Posted by: reagan80 at July 11, 2005 12:39 PM (NhOI1)
4
Just so you know, I too am a boomer ( 1961!)
i am too. you're on the cusp. we're Disco Teens. we were too young for Woodstock, too old to have computers in school. we danced to disco at our proms. some of us guys had perms (raises hand in shame). we don't connect with the boomers, aren't as pierced as the Gen Xers
Posted by: al at July 11, 2005 01:11 PM (ZPx7m)
5
1961 dob makes you *not* a boomer, guys. No way. You missed the party. So did my 1961 son, and while he regretted it for awhile, he's breathing a sigh of relief now, watching all the blobby boomers waddle into the sunset.
1961 is the cusp? Come on...by definition, the boomers are the result of the soldiers coming home from the Second World War and getting down to business. By 1961 --or 1960, for conception -- they were well past *that* impulse.
Anyway, Annika, thanks for the link...the secondary link. Varifrank is an excellent essayist, isn't he? My boomer husband, born in 1951, thought it was spot-on. But then, his essays always are.
Posted by: dymphna at July 11, 2005 02:58 PM (+/1R+)
6
Everyday is Groundhog Day for the left.
They relive one day in the 60s over and over again. Their thoughts don't change. Their perceived facts don't change. Their clothes and hair don't change (other than to get grayer.) Being left-wing is an old-people's disease-even if you are 20.
Gary Trudeau is a perfect example of an old fart stuck in Groundhog Day. He was semi-clever 40 years ago, but he has done the same thing day after day ever since.
Posted by: Jake at July 11, 2005 03:12 PM (r/5D/)
7
Good point Jake. Trudeau never grew.
Yeah, it's hell following the boomers through life. Our generation never even got named.
Posted by: Casca at July 11, 2005 03:33 PM (qBTBH)
8
baby boomers defined as:
The Baby Boomer Generation is a source for trends, research, comment and discussion of and by people born from 1946 - 1964.
yes you did casca.
yours is the age of rebellion.
Posted by: louielouie at July 11, 2005 03:49 PM (xKfMm)
9
"Trudeau never grew."
Spot on. My brothers and I have(somewhere!) a series of about 20 Doonesbury books, comprising a history of Trudeau's earliest public strips. It sounds so pompous, but we continued to mature intellectually, while Trudeau remains stuck. He may be emotionally attached to the lefty praise of 35 years ago, and unwilling to grow in a way which would force him to give it up - like a cheerleader/homecoming queen/athlete who never moves beyond past glory. And he's bitter!
Posted by: gcotharn at July 11, 2005 03:54 PM (lu3H/)
10
I was born in '58 so i always thought of myself as the very tailend of the boomers. I saw the guys who were a little older than me get themselves all messed up with drugs and it made me think. The biggest reason i became a right-winger though was the pretentious, shit-house philosophers like Troudeau who i met in college. I can see them now in their ratty jeans, with the long dirty hair, chainsmoking, dropping the "F" bomb every other word, and sooo full of themselves. GOD how I hate those pretentious a-holes!!!
Posted by: Kyle at July 11, 2005 04:43 PM (7Re84)
11
(ONLY A PUSSY WOULD REMOVE THIS POST.)
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN BUSH AND HITLER.
[post removed by annika. haa ha!]
Posted by: DEAN BERRY -- REAL AMERICAN at July 11, 2005 04:57 PM (zXK6J)
12
Well thanks! Ive very surprised that it was well received. I was in a bad mood that day and I let it get to me. I just cant stand it that the same people who talked about "power to the people" are the first ones to freak out if people really start doing things for themselves. Its the whole Orwell Animal Farm " some pigs are more important that other pigs" thing I guess. Theres just something about that generation that Ive always found creepy and im sure its because I came of age directly after the age of disco.
I thought I went a little too far, and I think I couldve cut it by half.
Oh and as far as comments go, if you guys saw the kind of email I get from the left, I think you would understand the steps I have to go through to keep the site useable.
If it helps, remember that I have to sign up to comment on my own site.
Thanks again!
Posted by: Frank Martin at July 11, 2005 05:12 PM (G+H5e)
13
Ours might have been the age of rebellion, but more in an
Animal House kinda way.
Posted by: d-rod at July 11, 2005 10:00 PM (ArmyN)
14
"ONLY A PUSSY WOULD REMOVE THIS POST."
Reminds me of what Mrs. Guzick used to say every time Dennis farted, "Dennis, only an asshole does that".
Posted by: Casca at July 11, 2005 10:01 PM (qBTBH)
15
Frank:
Genius, pure genius.
Posted by: shelly at July 12, 2005 01:24 AM (pO1tP)
16
kinda stupid calling a woman a "pussy", when you think about it.
Posted by: k at July 12, 2005 05:09 AM (7Re84)
17
I'm a boomer by birth (1950) only and am bitter as hell at what the lefties of my generation destroyed. We abandoned our allies in South Vietnam, which led to the millions dead in Cambodia. Quite a record to be proud of, no? On the domestic front, we can weigh undeniable advancement in civil rights against, drugs, disease, destruction of a decent educational system, and the welfare state.
Don't hate us all - I served, was not a druggie, and never did disco either.
Posted by: MarkD at July 12, 2005 06:20 AM (nQAo8)
18
By the way, Frank, it is the relatives of those same folks, you know, the elected ones, that hate the Janice Rogers Browns, the Condi Rices and Clarence Thomases so vehemently. They just cannot brook a smart, conservative black.
I have always imagined Ted Kenndy, for example, saying something like "I have worked my entire life so that you could advance to where you are now and stand on your own two feet, and you do not have the decency to think the way I tell you?".
I do not have to imagine my own father, who once told me "When you are old enough to think for yourself, I'll let you know." (I thought he was joking then, but I'm not sure today)
I love the blogs; they elected George W. Bush over the loud protests of the old boys/girls club of the mainstream media.
The Internet allowed the Swifties to out their message which has still not been refuted by Kerry. I still believe that was the turning point of the last election and that without them, Kerry would have been able to win Ohio and other close states.
The Internet has allowed that Coo Coo Clock Howard Dean to advance to Chair of the Democratic Party, allowing the world to finally see the true face of the Democrats that the media has helped obscure and disguise in order to win elections.
Thanks to the Internet, the Democrats will remain the permanent minority until they change their true policies to eliminate the fraud and corruption that has led to our failed policies in the period that preceded the Reagan Revolution.
God Bless America and the guy/girl that figured out the Internet; whoever he/she really was, he/she was the true hero of the last and this century.
Posted by: shelly at July 12, 2005 06:20 AM (pO1tP)
19
kinda stupid calling a woman a "pussy", when you think about it
Actually k, pussy in this context is short for pussilanimous. That means timid, cowardly and fearful - not qualities to admire in anyone. But that jackoff certainly is stupid - in every which way. ;-)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at July 12, 2005 07:40 AM (Hn8NG)
20
I love Al Franken and thank god for the radio personalities in Air America - they are the only ones in radio who are critical of the right.
Posted by: Daniel at July 12, 2005 11:56 PM (MgqlV)
21
Trudeau's strip repulsed me even as a child. His drawings are actually difficult to look at, and his writing is not terribly funny (more sarcastic than anything).
Nice link on Varifrank. Talk about a cyber pimpslap.
Posted by: mark at July 13, 2005 02:55 AM (iT0AD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 10, 2005
British Press Discovers The "T" Word
From
Moonbat Central:
Incredibly, the British press is actually using the 'T' word. Yes, they are referring to the London Underground perps as terrorists. Why is this so unusual? Because the British media have been religiously scrupulous in referring to all terrorists and mass murderers who attack Jews as 'activists' and 'militants'.
. . .
It was suddenly not a legitimate form of protest against occupation to mass-murder civilians. The British newspapers did not not issue special editions documenting the abuses of human rights by Britain, nor bemoan the 'grievances' of those angry at the UK. Not a single Euro-politician made a speech denouncing the illegal British occupations of the Channel Islands and Gibraltar.
. . .
And the BBC has not demanded that the Brits re-examine their own behavior, to discover which manifestation of their arrogance provoked the Al-Qaida savages.
. . .
There were no protests against British plans to implement 'profiling' at its airports and train stations. . . . Human rights groups did not demand that any captured subway terrorists be treated as prisoners of war with full Geneva Convention privileges and good lawyers.
Read the rest. Link thanks to
Lonely Thinker.
Posted by: annika at
10:28 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 206 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The Los Angeles Times (and its anti-semetic editor, John Carroll) could learn something from this posting. Their (his) policy of "Moral Equivalency" is so sickening that people have canceled their subscriptions by the tens of thousands. Yet, their policy remains unchanged.
Hamas, the cold blooded killers of innocent Israelis continues to be "freedom fighters" or "militants", as do any other murderers, suicide bombers or idiots who set thmeselves off in public places full of non-combatant women, children and peaceful citizens.
The war on terror is real and it is not something that civilized society started; but, as George Bush has said, we will end it.
The beginning of the end will be when our "free press" recognizes the folly of moral equivalency and and starts calling a killer a murderer, instead of examining his or her past and finding an excuse for wanton behavior, or blaming America first.
Murder is murder is murder.
Posted by: shelly at July 11, 2005 01:39 AM (pO1tP)
2
Amazing. When one is personally affected, suddenly convenient platitudes and spacy idealism fly right out the window.
Posted by: mark at July 11, 2005 07:40 AM (Vg0tt)
3
BBC will be on our side for about two weeks before it starts calling the London bombers "freedom fighters."
Posted by: Jake at July 11, 2005 09:19 AM (r/5D/)
4
Two weeks, Jake? That's optimism for you. My understanding is that the Beeb has already expunged the word "terrorist" from its website after two DAYS. They're beyond help: those who might really change are more likely the print media, though the Guardian and the Independent are ALMOST as bad as the BBC (not quite as bad since no one's forced to pay for them).
Posted by: Dave J at July 11, 2005 09:52 AM (CYpG7)
5
The Lord High Executioner had it right when he said, "Then the idiot who praises, with enthusiastic tone,
"All centuries but this, and every country but his own... they'd none of 'em be missed, they'd none of 'em be missed."
Posted by: Casca at July 11, 2005 03:44 PM (qBTBH)
6
Casca:
Love the Mikado reference; haven't thought of that wonderful song in years, but went back and looked at the lyrics and enjoyed it once again.
Great shot.
Posted by: shelly at July 12, 2005 01:38 AM (pO1tP)
Posted by: Rodger Schultz at July 12, 2005 09:41 AM (GgA51)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 06, 2005
July 05, 2005
Fantasy Baseball Update
We're a week away from the All-Star break, and i'm sure everybody's wondering how annika's A's are doing in annika's own fantasy baseball league, MLBloggers.
i suck.
Every other owner has been in first at least once. i've set a record for being in last place the most consecutive weeks.
Yep, pretty much all of them.
i drafted poorly. i built my team around Eric Gagné, who went on the DL almost immediately, came back briefly, and is out again. i got no runners except for Podsednik, with his sub-par offensive stats.
But that's only for starters.
i'm in the bottom three in the following stats: runs, home runs, runs batted in, stolen bases, batting average, on base percentage, wins, saves, strikeouts, earned run average and walk+hit ratio.
Yep, pretty much all of them.
i'm even behind Ted, who doesn't even like baseball. i'm way behind gcotharn, and he's never played fantasy baseball before. (In fact, gcotharn is in first place!)
Victor and Matt tried to help me out with some very generous trades, and yet i still suck. While Dawn and The Maximum Leader never make a roster change and they're beating me.
i'm losing to Paul, who apparently gave up his blog so he could devote more time to kicking my ass!
Even a Geek knows more about baseball than i do.
It's hard to believe, but i'm even losing to a bunch of Zombies and Rats.
Yes, as Charlie Brown said: Rats.
Posted by: annika at
09:25 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 251 words, total size 2 kb.
1
The race is not always to the swift, nor the contest to the strong, but that's the way you bet.
Posted by: Casca at July 05, 2005 09:49 PM (qBTBH)
2
I'm working hard to meet you at the bottom, though.
Which, if you weren't paying attention, almost sounds naughty.
Heheh.
Posted by: zombyboy at July 05, 2005 09:52 PM (jMD7w)
3
fantasy football is even more fun. I am looking forward to Football season. I have a big HD tv and I got NFL total package HDTV from Direct TV. ITs gonna be so sweet.
My wife plans on visiting me in the living room a couple of hours each week.
Posted by: Kyle at July 06, 2005 05:31 AM (7Re84)
4
Accept the grim reality honey. How can you compete against adversaries who drink rat blood, eat nuclear waste, control human thought, breath fire and even regenerate?
Posted by: d-rod at July 06, 2005 06:38 AM (Lsghx)
5
You might have noticed that I, too, almost never change my roster. Two children vying for daddy's attention: do I give in or go update my roster? Ehh, fantasy baseball loses out most of the time.
Don't worry about being in last. I have an almost unique ability to come roaring into the back. On the other hand, I'll bring beer when I come, so at least we won't be thirsty in last place.
Posted by: physics geek at July 06, 2005 07:37 AM (Xvrs7)
6
This is only my second experience with fantasy sports, the first being fantasy hockey a couple of years ago. I have no idea what's going on most of the time.
And it's not that I hate baseball, I hate what baseball has become.
Posted by: Ted at July 07, 2005 03:41 AM (blNMI)
7
Ted, for a while, the traditionalists at Major League Baseball were pondering putting advertisements on the bases.
Advertisemets.
On the bases.
My guess is that Bud "What Steroids?" Selig got an avalanche of hate mail because the idea died a quick death.
Posted by: Mark at July 08, 2005 08:40 AM (Vg0tt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 04, 2005
July 4th Gala
A salute to Milbloggers.

Throughout our nation's great history, patriotic ladies on the homefront have always stood behind our fighting men (and now women) 110%. From Betsy Ross and Clara Barton to Rosie the Riveter and the Gold Star Moms, American women have felt pride in each victory and grieved each tragic loss as our nation's military stood guard over our freedoms.

Here on the blogosphere, the ladies of The Cotillion are no different. For this year's July 4th celebration, we are highlighting some of the great Milbloggers, current and former military men and women, who have kept us all so well informed in this age of media bias.

euphoricReality
euphoricReality’s tagline is “Because truth is more important than popularity,” which is a fitting motto for any milblogger.
The four bloggers who run this site are Kit Jarrell, an Air Force veteran who served in Bosnia; KitÂ’s husband Corey "The Marine," who served three years in the USMCÂ’s elite Marine Security Guard Battalion; former Army Airborne veteran and history buff Heidi Theiss; and finally guest writer Andi (who has her own blog), a veteran of the storied 2nd Armored Division.
euphoricReality does a great service by regularly highlighting some of our American Heroes like Gunnery Sergeant Nick Popaditch, for whom we should all give thanks.
Today, Heidi has posted a 4th of July Tribute featuring some beautiful songs of patriotism that mean a lot to her. They may bring a tear to your eye. And so may Kit Jarrell's update on the missing Recon team in Afghanistan. The media has reported their loss so matter-of-factly, that we tend to forget how much we owe to men like these. Kit names them, and reminds us not to forget them:
As you enjoy your holiday today, take a moment to remember these men and their sacrifice. DonÂ’t just say you will and forget as soon as you get out to your patio. Really stop. Think about what they gave so you can throw some fat steaks on your grill, hoist a beer, and spend time with family and friends.
When youÂ’re done doing that, say a prayer for the families of these men. Their barbecues and family reunions will never be complete again.

Stryker Brigade News
The Stryker Brigade News blog is a site run by a group of volunteers, all of whom have friends or family serving in the Army's Stryker Brigade Combat Teams. As you all know, the Stryker is a wheeled armored combat vehicle, and this blog contains a great many Stryker related photographs, some very artistic.
Last October, one of Stryker Brigade News' contributors became personally acquainted with the price of war. Mike Oreskovic's son Michael was severely injured in a car bomb attack only a week before he was scheduled to come home. The blog has continued to update regularly on Mike's recovery since then. Most recently Mike was featured in a Washington Post article as one of several veterans who attended this weekend's reenactment of the Battle of Gettysburg. The full article is very much worth reading.

Brain Shavings
Representing the United States Coast Guard in the ranks of Milbloggers is Puddle Pirate of Brain Shavings. The Pirate has a novel idea on how property owners can insulate themselves from eminent domain seizures in the post-Kelo era.
Let's say that you own some attractive real estate that your local government wants to take from you through eminent domain. To foil their plans you enter into a contract with the state government, where in exchange for a fee, the state automatically takes title to your property if your municipal or county government ever attempts to condemn it, and you get to live on the land. Perhaps it could be set up as a trust with the state as trustee.
Anyway, since a local government doesn't have the authority to condemn state property, they lose all incentive to condemn your property once you tell them about your new arrangement. If the condemnation would be for a true public use (as we used to understand it) like building a highway or a bridge, you can always put a clause in the contract that exempts such true public uses from triggering the passage of title to the state.
Interesting idea. Brain Shavings has been
all over the Kelo story with insight and good humor.

doubleplusgood infotainment
doubleplusgood infotainment has been a long time fixture on my own blogroll. Its proprietor, JCrue, is a retired Marine who blogs from Reno, Nevada. i like his tagline: "Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots."
Being from Nevada and all, JCrue has a special incentive to keep an eye on the disgrace that is our Senate Minority leader. He pulls no punches either.
Screw you, Harry. I saw what Carter did to our nation and I saw what Clinton refused to do for our country and I have to say, you and your fellow party members are at least dedicated to the same cowardice those two were.
When the troops begin to believe the (D) party supports them and no longer hears your party's words on al-Jazerra as evidence of dissent and used as anti-American propaganda, then maybe, just maybe, I will start to believe what you have to say. But only when the men and women serving overseas believe without reservation and are confident in their daily tasks that you, the (D) party, and the entire nation stands behind them, your words sound hollow.
Also, JCrue reminds us to continue sending messages of thanks and support to our troops
by clicking here.

ARMOR GEDDON
ARMOR GEDDON is a fabulous blog, run by Neil Prakash who is currently stationed in Germany after a tour in Iraq commanding an M1 Abrams tank. It's a relatively new blog, which he started at the urging of his friend Sarah of Trying to Grok. (Sarah's husband served alongside Neil in Iraq.)
Neil's blog contains some of the best war writing of any Milblogger around. Seriously. He's funny, he explains things well, and he has a great eye for the details of a tanker's life. You really get an insight into both day-to-day life and the exhilaration of combat. Neil's posts about the battles of Fallujah and Baqubah are worth reading from beginning to end. He should think about contacting a literary agent someday.
Not to be missed are ARMOR GEDDON's collection of video clips from Iraq. His latest is a montage of footage related to a few IEDs his platoon found on Election Day in Iraq. It's a mini-movie, complete with explanatory footnotes in this post. Great stuff, if you have broadband. Even if you don't, it's totally worth waiting for on dial-up. Trust me. Turn up the volume and enjoy the fun.

So, from annika's journal a very special Thank You goes out to all Milbloggers and every member and veteran of our armed services: Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Coast Guard. Thank you for watching our backs on this Fourth of July and on every day of the year. We owe you a great debt, and we'll keep you all in our prayers.
Please also go check out the other Milblogger tributes filed by the wonderful ladies of the Cotillion.
Happy Fourth!
Posted by: annika at
12:08 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1212 words, total size 10 kb.
1
beautiful rundown, baby.
happy 4th!
Posted by: tony at July 04, 2005 05:13 PM (jeGX+)
2
You know what's wrong with seals... actually, most of the special ops folks? They believe their own advertising. Don't get me wrong, they're great warriors, they just don't have any adult leadership, so they believe what they see in the movies.
Twenty years ago, before we became purple-suited romanticists, we were realists. We traded firepower for lives. Now we're trading lives for firepower. It's just wrong. No self-respecting trigger-puller with two braincells would go anywhere without his supporting arms, i.e. indirect fire weapons.
If I were calling the shots. I'd sit a spectre up there, and light up every hotspot. There are no friendlys out there.
Posted by: Casca at July 04, 2005 09:44 PM (qBTBH)
3
thank you, annika.
i just found out about this today. very kind words indeed.
you're the best!
Posted by: jcrue at July 05, 2005 11:30 AM (99min)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 30, 2005
Statement Of This Blog's Purpose
The purpose of this blog is to:
1. Bloviate.
2. Increase awareness and appreciation of good poetry.
3. Make fun of people, especially celebrities.
4. Interact with like-minded folks.
5. Promote my own ego-satisfaction.
It is not the purpose of this blog to:
1. Present ironclad arguments in favor of my stated positions, although i sometimes try to do that.
2. Regurgitate the party line, as all long-time visitors should know.
3. Sacrifice honesty to the god of consistency or slay the demon of fallacious reasoning, although i tend to favor those ideals.
4. Be nice, although i often am.
5. Promote your agenda; your website; your point of view; or your online gambling/porn/prescription drug scam.
i've successfully avoided posting a Statement of Blog's Purpose for over two years, but i think its time has come. i'm sick of people telling me what i should and shouldn't do with my own bandwidth. [Well... Pixy's bandwidth.] If i want to make fun of Lindsay Lohan, i will. If i want to do a non-religious post on Easter Sunday, i will. If i want to drop a subtle hint that i might not be celibate, i fucking will. If i want to run your ass out of the comments because i don't like you for no good reason at all, i will. Even though i almost never do that, i reserve any and all rights.
That is all.
More: Wow. i thought i was pissed off. Check out Beth. Right on girl!
Posted by: annika at
03:18 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 257 words, total size 2 kb.
1
amen sister. i especially like the placement of "fucking" in relation to celibate.
Posted by: Blu at June 30, 2005 03:32 PM (j8oa6)
Posted by: Casca at June 30, 2005 03:33 PM (qBTBH)
3
O-o-o-o-o-o-k-a-a-a-a-y. That's sufficiently "in your[mine/theirs/whoever's] face" to meet this month's quota.
Posted by: Iam Doubt at June 30, 2005 03:38 PM (yVOyy)
4
Yes, Boss. Gettin a drink of water over here, Boss.
Posted by: Jake at June 30, 2005 04:04 PM (r/5D/)
5
I also am not in favor of regurgitation. It amazes me to discover that some people love it. "Sean Hannity (or Al Franken) said it...I believe it...it's goo enough for me."\
My blog included a statement of purpose in its
very first post. Occasionally I revisit it to see how far I've strayed.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at June 30, 2005 04:05 PM (m3UmI)
Posted by: annika at June 30, 2005 04:13 PM (zAOEU)
7
Just you keep shakin that tree, cool hand Jake.
[as long as we're doing movie references.]
Posted by: annika at June 30, 2005 04:27 PM (zAOEU)
8
Annika:
Yessssssssssssssssssssssss.
You got my obscure movie reference.
Yessssssssssssssssssssssss.
You know everything.
Posted by: Jake at June 30, 2005 04:46 PM (r/5D/)
9
I don't get people telling me what to post about mainly because I get about 30 visitors a day. *Sigh*
On the plus side, I've received a total of two pieces of hate mail.
Posted by: Mark at June 30, 2005 04:53 PM (K9Q/+)
10
as annika's journal becomes more popular/well known, and it is/will, more of this will be necessary.
cap'n ed is getting trolls.
i recognized one here in a different thread, but have chosen not to feed him.......so far.
i'm not going to kiss annika's ass and go into the reasons i think her site is becoming more popular.
i would, however, kiss her ass for numerous other reasons.......and she would liiiiiiiiikit.
Posted by: louielouie at June 30, 2005 06:04 PM (xKfMm)
11
Hey Annie, it's your sandbox; I appreciate you letting me build castles occassionally. If others find the time to post comments explaining how you should run YOUR blog, might I suggest that you engage in some judicious word rearranging of their comments. It might surprise some people to be the top ten results from Google when the search criteria are "molests baby squirrels".
Words of wisdom that I heard in "Long Gone": Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke. Nah, sex is a good thing. The better choice would be to NOT fuck 'em. Just my opinion, of course. I could be wrong.
Posted by: physics geek at June 30, 2005 06:33 PM (9xutE)
12
It may be time to retitle this place. How about, "Beauty and the Geeks"? The hairy-palmed throng lining up here these days... ah well, I guess one must take all comers in this business.
Posted by: Casca at June 30, 2005 06:46 PM (qBTBH)
13
Excuse me, Annie, but was I married to you?
Posted by: shelly at June 30, 2005 11:15 PM (pO1tP)
14
Beautiful banner! (I changed mine too this week. It looks good considering I don't own PhotoShop.)
Who's the blondie on the left side?
Posted by: Mark at June 30, 2005 11:56 PM (Q8GPa)
Posted by: annika at July 01, 2005 06:42 AM (w82e2)
16
" Promote your agenda; your website; your point of view; or your online g*mbling/porn/prescription drug scam."
I am personally offended as I often try to present my scams to he world for public offering.
Posted by: cube at July 01, 2005 06:48 AM (nyNr0)
17
long time reader from the east coast. keep up the awesomeness of your site. But why no buzzwords in your mission statement, such as:
"Leverage core competencies with a goals-directed focus combining proactive action with dynamic paradigms in a synergistic fashion that highlights overall strategic output."
Posted by: albo at July 01, 2005 08:33 AM (ZPx7m)
18
i like it, Albo. But isn't that the mission statement for all blogs?
Posted by: annika at July 01, 2005 09:02 AM (zAOEU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Conservative Back-Slapping Quote Of The Day
At the risk of being accused as a mindless parroter of conservative talking points, let me quote
Jeff Goldstien's deconstruction of the "chickenhawk meme," which is so clever i plan to adopt it and mindlessly parrot it all over fucking creation.
HOWS THAT ASSSHOLE?! THAT FUCKING PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE ENOUGH FOR YOU YOU PRETENTIIOUS HYPOCRITICAL DICK?!!
[N.B. The above flip-out was directed at a troll, not you, Jeff.]
But i digress. Here's the quote:
Sadly, the chickenhawk argument, though logically puerile, can prove quite rhetorically effective—in the same sense that charges of homophobia and racism have proven effective in debates over gay marriage and government funded affirmative action programs: such charges, cynically delivered, tend to stifle substantive discourse, forcing one side of the argument onto the defensive by changing the focus of the debate from the issues themselves to the character of certain professors of those issues—and in that regard, they help to sustain the status quo.
The bottom line is, the chickenhawk argument is an impediment to legitimate discourse and debate—and legitimate discourse and debate over national security is a necessity in a free society; and for that reason, those who raise the chickenhawk argument should be treated by everyone—right and left—as intellectual pariahs.
. . .
The gist of most of the 'arguments' in support of the [chickenhawk] meme’s righteousness is that people so willing to speak vociferously in favor of the war should put their money where their mouths are—and merely advocating for the cause doesn’t count. Which means, of course, FDR should’ve strapped on a helmet, picked up a rifle, and had one of his aides wheel his crippled ass in front of a Panzer. BECAUSE OF THE HYPOCRISY!
Well put, indeed.
Posted by: annika at
01:55 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 2 kb.
1
thats why i keep coming back

great post
Posted by: troll? at June 30, 2005 02:28 PM (7exp2)
2
I used to work with someone who, when accused of being this or that, would say:
"Ok, I'm this or that. But lets stay focused on the point we are discussing..."
They handled that type of thing as well as anyone I've ever seen.
It is an exasperating thing to have interjected into a conversation. Its difficult not to roll one's eyes and give back some attitude. But that's what they actually want. You give attitude; the conversation is sidetracked; they win.
Posted by: gcotharn at June 30, 2005 03:25 PM (F5ahJ)
3
The "chickenhawk" slur is uber-illogical:
If you dislike crime, why aren't you a police officer?
If you don't like homes on fire, why aren't you a firefighter?
If you hate the idea of stray pets, why don't you adopt a cat or 10?
I am sure you think up your own examples, but none of the ones I have given (as well as the "chickenhawk" bomb) even attempt to deal with the real underlying issues. Just diverts it to the people involved in the conversation.
Posted by: Mark at June 30, 2005 03:46 PM (or801)
4
"If you are so against the ChimpyMcBushHitler-Halliburton war, then why haven't you gone to Fallujah to sign up for the insurgency? Why not help out where help is most needed to end teh IllegalWarForOil? I mean sitting on the Web carping about it isn't doing a single thing to end it. It's about Direct Action ma-an! Go put your action where your mouth is."
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 30, 2005 04:36 PM (n/TmV)
5
Heh, a good evening for me is whiping a gunny sack full of hairball makers off the bay bridge, but that was a good one DC.
Posted by: Casca at June 30, 2005 06:49 PM (qBTBH)
6
Each time someone lobs the
chickenhawk rhetoric at me on my blog (almost daily, it seems), I've found the best way to shut them up is to mention that I have already pulled a tour in Iraq.
The usual respone (because they don't know when the hell to give up), is why don't I re-enlist if I believe so much in
this current war. The fact that I'm now disabled from my first tour usually shuts them up. But now I'm going to have to use that "wheel my his ass in front of a Panzer" quote.
Brilliant!
Posted by: Robbie at June 30, 2005 09:27 PM (htx4h)
7
The original chickenhawk term specfically referred to the pussies (like Bush) who actively dodged the draft, but still supported the war. Folks like Limbaugh, Cheney, G. W. Bush, Tom Delay, et al. ad nauseum, who were as gung ho as they could be about 'Nam except for the part where they might be drafted themselves.
BTW, hearing you spout off about the use of the term stifling debate has a wonderfully comic effect. Lanks for the laughs.
Posted by: sigh at July 11, 2005 10:03 PM (n5EIB)
8
The original chickenhawk term specfically referred to the pussies (like Bush) who actively dodged the draft, but still supported the war. Folks like Limbaugh, Cheney, G. W. Bush, Tom Delay, et al. ad nauseum, who were as gung ho as they could be about 'Nam except for the part where they might be drafted themselves.
BTW, hearing you spout off about the use of the term stifling debate has a wonderfully comic effect. Thanks for the laughs.
Posted by: sigh at July 11, 2005 10:03 PM (n5EIB)
Posted by: annika at July 11, 2005 10:19 PM (iXY4D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 29, 2005
This Week's Cotillion Ball
Please check out this week's Cotillion Ball, hosted by the following lovely and talented ladies:
Rightwingsparkle
Not a Desperate Housewife
Maxed out Mama
Janette and Jody
This is some of the best stuff on the blogosphere, so don't miss it.
And while i'm at it, please go to fellow Munuvian Oddybobo's blog and read "I've Been Thinking, and That Is Bad!" Her thoughts on the Supreme Court are so close to mine, that i don't need to do that anti-establishment clause post i was going to do. Now i can take the night off, thanks Bobo!
Posted by: annika at
12:12 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 104 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Do they wear anything under those skirts?
Posted by: Casca at June 29, 2005 04:48 PM (qBTBH)
2
What about my take on it? huh?
Posted by: Scof at June 30, 2005 04:36 AM (x8hF4)
3
Laziest case of plagiarism I've ever seen ;~)
Posted by: Victor at June 30, 2005 04:50 AM (L3qPK)
4
Forgot to mention--I *love* the graphic you've got for your Cotillion link. Looks almost like an Erte print.
Posted by: Victor at June 30, 2005 04:52 AM (L3qPK)
5
Thank you for the linky-love. I needed a good rant.
Posted by: Oddybobo at June 30, 2005 05:17 AM (6Gm0j)
6
Thank you Victor, i stole it. Can't remember from whom.
Posted by: annika at June 30, 2005 07:14 AM (NCFFn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 27, 2005
A Lovely Left Blogger
i wanted to see what bloggers were saying about the death of 58 year old Wal-Mart heir and Silver Star awardee, John Walton.
He died in Wyoming today, when his experimental ultra-light crashed.
i looked up "John Walton" on Technorati and saw a pretty disgusting LiveJournal entry by a "blogger" (LJ blogs aren't real blogs, as you all know.) whom i won't link to. This ignorant bitch requires registration to read her drivel, so i couldn't read the whole entry. But the Technorati robot pulled this quote, which was quite enough:
The 11th richest asshole in the world ($18 billion) was killed in some kind of plane crash in Wyomning. John Walton (of Walmart), 53, is plunging towards the bowels of hell at this very moment.
John Walton, was more than just the world's eleventh richest man. He was a Green Beret medic in Vietnam, who received his Silver Star "for helping save the lives of several members of his unit while under intense enemy fire." i wonder if that LiveJournal bitch was aware of that.
Like most Americans with his kind of wealth, Mr. Walton was known as a philanthropist. The foundation he ran donated over 700 million dollars to education related causes over the last six years. i wonder how much LiveJournal bitch has contributed to charity.
Oh annika, you don't understand; the Waltons are rich, conservative, anti-union and Christian, so that makes them the embodiment of evil.
[As i continue to bang my head against the wall.]
Update: Zombyboy plumbs the depths of depravity known as the Democratic Underground, where many comments are in a similar, bigoted and hateful vein.
Posted by: annika at
11:35 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 269 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Annie,
While you and I, and no doubt Mr. Walton's fellow soldiers, may be impressed and thankful for his courageous service, the left would view it as just further evidence that he was a "killer".
Posted by: Pursuit at June 28, 2005 05:10 AM (n/TNS)
2
annie, stop banging your head on the wall; I find it better to mutter, "Tut, tut," while shaking my head ruefully. It's less painful, doesn't leave scars, and is just as effective in dealing with those who do not see.
Posted by: Victor at June 28, 2005 05:16 AM (L3qPK)
3
yes, pursuit, but medics are non-combatants! for pete's sake.
Posted by: annika at June 28, 2005 06:57 AM (aQZcw)
4
Ah, but he was saving the lives of killers!
Posted by: Pursuit at June 28, 2005 07:06 AM (n/TNS)
5
Ms. Annie...
You might want to check with Matt over at Blackfive but I don't think Special Forces medics are noncombatants...
Posted by: davek at June 28, 2005 07:07 AM (oBH+P)
6
Yes, it seems that John Walton committed the biggest crime against humanity, he had money. It's a shame, I am sure. It's too bad that he isn't as talented as Micheal Moore because he is such a positive role model for society. He has money, but he is all about helping out the poor - right? I'm sorry, I am digressing.
Actually you are spot on. The LJ'er couldn't be bothered about finding out the actual truth about the man. All she needed to know was that he had money. But it's odd, I doubt that she will ever say anything nasty about all those celeBRATies who have all that money...
Posted by: ethne at June 28, 2005 07:26 AM (miAG4)
7
Since when do idiots permit facts, reason, and logic to get in their way?
And talking ill about a man who died a day prior in a PLANE CRASH -- how classy can you get?
Posted by: Mark at June 28, 2005 09:20 AM (bToiD)
8
sure - she/it was way to busy hating the man for being successful to actually research what he was all about ... and being a proud member of the lower 49%.
/TJ
Posted by: TJ at June 28, 2005 09:22 AM (9Rmby)
9
annie,
take victor's advice.
i wonder if this guy was the guy/father that got into that naming fiasco at the u of mizzou a couple years ago.
although i don't condemn the rich, i do wonder out loud sometimes how people that are as dumb as dirt, read as THK, can fall into a pile of shit and come out smelling like a lincoln rose.
trust fund babies.
Posted by: louielouie at June 28, 2005 10:54 AM (xKfMm)
10
It makes me so sick that someone could make that kind of statement. Disgusting.
Posted by: ginger at June 28, 2005 12:33 PM (g2QG2)
11
Annie,
Thank you for the additional information about John Walton. It gives us information on the kind of man he was.
It is wrong that some people assume because a person has a lot of money, that person is a jerk.
Appears to me to be just the opposite.
Again, thank you.
Posted by: N Diane at June 28, 2005 02:54 PM (CAT+l)
12
Don't hurt your head! Its such a pretty head. And filled with Civil War knowledge....
Posted by: gcotharn at June 28, 2005 05:34 PM (U/NfN)
13
i'm new to this site. it's so much fun to see passive-aggressive right-wingers pat each other on the back! it's almost so obvious that we shouldn't speak ill of this man who died the other day that you all shouldn't have to reassure yourselves so much. almost. it's great to watch though, you all took that one disgusting comment from some clueless webmonger and used it not only to defend something that hadn't been attacked (the monied class, or whatever) but to attack the imaginary attackers. you rightwingers have used this imaginary-attacker-siege-mentality to great effect recently, mostly defending yourselves from the phantom "attacks" by the left on things like marriage (gasp! gay marriage will kill america!) and religion (gasp! we're under fire because everyone doesn't agree with us!). don't you realize that defending something that hasn't been attacked makes you seem weak? anyway. i look forward to your snarky, passive-aggressive pile-on of responses. it'll be funny to see what happens when you aren't in the majority anymore and you have to figure out what you're really about again. endless power and enlargement of government aren't exactly bedrock republican principles, but you seem to have made an exception for bush.
by the way, however full of shit that LJ bitch was, the reason some reasonable people don't like wal-mart is that it has put small businesses out of business and basically shuttered whole regions of the country. in the red states mostly. where's the outcry.
now answer a question i didnt ask, defend against something that wasn't attacked, and spew the party line! it's fun and simple!
Posted by: eric at June 30, 2005 11:34 AM (hiCir)
14
how about i just fucking ignore you?
Posted by: annika at June 30, 2005 12:56 PM (Y4qg6)
15
well you're enlightened and that's what bush wants so enjoy.

so much anger.
Posted by: eric at June 30, 2005 01:31 PM (hiCir)
16
Here's the accusation:
(Take a) comment from some clueless webmonger and use...it not only to defend something that hadn't been attacked...but to attack the imaginary attackers.
And here's the accuser doing that very thing:
don't you realize that defending something that hasn't been attacked makes you seem weak? anyway. i look forward to your snarky, passive-aggressive pile-on of responses.
Nice!
Posted by: Desert Cat at June 30, 2005 05:31 PM (n/TmV)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Major's View
Doug Tennapel interviewed United States Air Force Major Steven A. Givler, who served during both Iraq wars as an intelligence officer.
Some highlights:
As far as ethics and rules of engagement are concerned, we take greater pains than any military in the world to safeguard civilian life. We actually incur a good deal of risk in order to avoid hurting people or damaging property. People donÂ’t realize what a change this is from how war has been waged throughout history. Civilian populations have always born the brunt of war, and suffered from the after effects. Look at WWII.
To destroy a single factory in Germany we might have had to destroy the entire city surrounding it, just because of the inaccuracy of our weapons. In Japan, we had to destroy even more because of JapanÂ’s decentralized industries. In Iraq though, I stood on a bridge that had been destroyed with a single laser-guided bomb. The mosque next to the bridge was completely unscathed. We could have carpeted the entire area with a B-52 full of dumb bombs from a safe altitude, but instead we sent in a fighter that risked surface to air fire just so we could be precise and spare any unnecessary damage. This in spite of the fact that our enemy makes no distinction between military and civilian, and has time and time again, used mosques and churches for military purposes such as fighting positions or places for hiding weapons caches.
. . .
When I see those 'war is not the answer' bumper stickers, I always wonder 'what was the question?' Because maybe weÂ’re talking different questions. Certainly, if the question is 'What do you do about a group of men who believe in slavery, who are completely dedicated to killing every one of us, and who cannot be negotiated with,' the war is definitely the answer.
People with those bumper stickers remind me of people who think meat comes from a grocery store. They have completely forgotten that something had to die in order for them to eat, and before it found its way to that sterile Styrofoam tray, that steak went through a very messy process. They have forgotten too, that our founding fathers said that occasionally the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of patriots. It amazes me that they seem unaware that, were it not for war, their bumper stickers, if they were allowed to have them, would be printed in German, or Japanese, or Russian. War, and our success at it, is precisely what has earned them the freedom to be so naïve.
Unfortunately, the world is an imperfect place. Evil exists. Some people are so given over to it that there is nothing else that can be done with them other than to kill them. I know this is difficult for some people to believe. I wish I could show them what IÂ’ve seen, like the Brothel Palace, outside of Baghdad, where Saddam and his friends imprisoned women they kidnapped off the streets. Or maybe I could introduce them to Iraqis who were forced to watch their family members fed feet-first (to prolong the suffering) through plastic shredders. Maybe that would change their minds, but probably not. ThatÂ’s alright. IÂ’ve been there. I know that 5 million Iraqis owe their freedom to a war fought for them by Americans. I know that for them, war has definitely been the answer.
Posted by: annika at
11:07 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 578 words, total size 3 kb.
1
My favorite quote:
"People with those bumper stickers remind me of people who think meat comes from a grocery store. They have completely forgotten that something had to die in order for them to eat, and before it found its way to that sterile Styrofoam tray, that steak went through a very messy process."
Rock on, Major.
Posted by: reagan80 at June 27, 2005 01:17 PM (hlMFQ)
2
Wonderful post. Spread this one around the whole blogosphere.
Seriously.
Posted by: Mark at June 27, 2005 04:11 PM (Vg0tt)
3
Certainly there is truth in what this air force pogue has to say, BUTT-Monkey, one thing that civilians don't understand about the military is that the differences between the services, and the specialties within, which have survived over a decade of androgenization to emerge in wartime as starkly pragmatic. The Air Force has had almost no casualties, while the Marine Corps has borne a disproportionate share in the war in Iraq. Ground combat is an entirely different animal than dropping a bomb on a bridge. Ask those shitheads in Fallujah what we didn't shoot. If we made a mistake in this war, it was in being too careful, and not bloody enough. God bless Curtis Lemay, he understood.
Posted by: Casca at June 27, 2005 05:38 PM (qBTBH)
4
amazingly deep comments. i wish i could see a brainscan of you people. it's amazing how deftly you deflect and obfuscate, answering questions that were never asked and changing the answers when it suits you. do you really believe all liberals don't know the costs of war? i tune out the dopey democrats who say we should pull out - we're there, so we have to finish the job, clearly. but when someone asks how we can improve the safety of our forces, or whether we should even TALK about a plan for getting out eventually, you all act as if the questioner is a terrorist sympathizer. that's called ignoring the question, which is a clear sign of weakness and, recently, desperation. i know to you rightwingers nixon was a liberal, so maybe this won't help - but the stuff i hear every day about questioning the leader being akin to helping the enemy has been copied verbatim from nixon+vietnam. desperate. i don't believe you're all stupid or crazy, so i wonder why you're hanging onto it so aggressively.
everyone knows that war is bad, and i hope even you fringers can answer the simple question "would you rather have war or not war?" correctly.
the meat analogy is telling - if you look close, you might say the author is suggesting that we look at the causes, justifications, and planning that led to this war. but you don't like to do that. it's much easier to just spit the party line.
Posted by: eric at June 30, 2005 11:47 AM (hiCir)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
132kb generated in CPU 0.0691, elapsed 0.1545 seconds.
77 queries taking 0.1082 seconds, 309 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.