Betcha no sportspage editor would have the guts to do it.

Posted by: annika at 04:19 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

If the Lakers lose tonight, it will be because they did not get the ball to Shaq on every posession. Larry Brown knows that Kobe will try to take the game on his shoulders, and like last Sunday, Kobe will be triple teamed. Get the ball in to Shaq and stay in the triangle offense.

But they won't do that. Because guys like George and Medvedenko think they are good, instead of hacks, which is what they really are. They will come downcourt and throw up jumpers with 15 on the shot clock, like they always do.

If Detroit wins, much as i love my Lakers, i will have to admit that the best team did win.

Posted by: annika at 04:31 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.

My fantasy team is still mired in 7th place, despite my latest couple of genius moves. i picked up Joe Kennedy of Colorado (hopefully he won't crash and burn*); dumped Mike MacDougal who's never fully recovered from a stomach virus and was sent down last week; i replaced Marlon Anderson at 2nd base with Orlando Hudson of the BJ's (.296-5-21), i got a good feeling about him; and i dumped middle reliever Guillermo Mota for a true closer, Billy Koch of the White Sox, which will hopefully net me more saves.

But today, perhaps you heard, Milwaukee's Ben Sheets punched out 18 batters! Yah, i got 'im! Not only that, but the only run scored against him today was a 410 foot blast by Andruw Jones. Yah, i got 'im too!

What's really holding me back in the Yahoo! league is home runs and RBIs. Thank God for my twin belters: Beltre and Beltran, both of whom i got, and both of whom have 10 homers apiece. Still, i'm waiting for Bagwell and Jones to start hitting like i know they can.

* That was in poor taste, i know.

Posted by: annika at 07:41 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 196 words, total size 2 kb.

What is it about So Cal teams and the last minute, come from behind, miracle shot?

Amazing!

Update: Read ESPN's Page 2 column: "Livin la vida Lakers."

Posted by: annika at 09:58 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.

If you see a rookie from Asia, by all means pick him up. He'll often be ranked low and overlooked by the other league members. And he might just kick ass his first year, since no one will have any experience with him. Think Nomo and Ichiro in their rookie seasons.

This year i picked up Hee Seop Choi and Kazuo Matsui under the radar. Choi is currently tied for fourth place in the NL with 5 home runs. And he's playing for the defending champs, so i expect him to improve as the season goes on. Matsui is hitting a respectable .302 right now, although i may dump him for José Valentín pretty soon.

Posted by: annika at 12:06 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.

The Dodgers have the best record in baseball. They just finished a sweep of the San Francisco Giants, their great rivals. i caught two of the three games on TV. Each game was a one run victory. i don't think i've ever seen the Dodgers sweep a series with San Francisco, although i'm told they did it when Pac Bell opened.

Now my best friend Betty, who grew up here, is needling me to be a Dodger fan. i'm also feeling the pressure from Scof, way over there in Texas. But you know the Dodger-Giants rivalry is bigger than you or me or anyone. It's been going on for 100 years! It just might be the most heated rivalry in all of sports. It's certainly up there with the Yankees-Red Sox, the Raiders-Broncos, or even the Celtic-Rangers rivalries for longevity.

Still, i've never really been a big Giants fan. i always followed them, but i grew up in Oakland and i'm really an Athletics fan, if you wanna know the truth. i still remember vivdly one of the greatest, and most disappointing, events in all of sports history: Kirk Gibson's two strike, two out, pinch-hit walk-off homer, bottom of the ninth inning, game one of the 1988 World Series, off ace reliever Dennis Eckersley, to spur the Dodgers on to upset my A's for the World Championship.

Can i forgive them? Well, they're in different leagues, so i can conceivably root for both my A's and the Dodgers. i do like a team with history, and the Dodgers have that. So, now that i am a resident of Los Angeles, i will give it a try. And it helps, too, that i have Odalis Perez, Guillermo Mota, and Adrian Beltré on my fantasy team. Go Dodgers!

That said, there's no way they deserved to win today. How the hell do you pitch to Bonds with first base open, when he's doubled and homered already against the same pitcher? What kind of Jim Tracy brain fart was that? i could see if Gagne were on the mound, but Jeff Weaver? Come on! The Dodgers were lucky to escape with a one run win today.

Posted by: annika at 06:50 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 399 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Well, Annika, I'm an As guy, and I was at Cal when Kirk Gibson hit that damned home run and broke our collective green n' gold hearts. But I have no particular brief for the Giants. I rooted for the A's in the quake series of 1989. And I have gradually come round to the Dodgers; it was Mike Piazza's rookie season in 1993 that did it for me. I don't care much for baseball, of course, so it's easy for me. It's not like I am being asked to switch from Cal to Stanford, or Celtic to Rangers, or the 49ers to the Rams, or Newcastle to Sunderland. Those would be hard. Blithely adopting Dodger Blue is easy. Oh yeah, and Go Sharks GO!

Posted by: Hugo at April 18, 2004 08:08 PM (TOkNs)

2 The Dodgers? The team we love to hate; it seems we're getting to be a lot like the Cubs fans, doesn't it? We all ridicule them, then go out and die with them. I've been ready to give up my primo four field box seats in aisle 6 for the last five years, but somehow when renewal comes around, my masochistic self won't let me just tear up the piece of paper. Maybe next year? (Don't ever believe they can stay where they are now with the crap pitching they've got, especially Weaver)

Posted by: shelly s. at April 19, 2004 05:16 AM (rZmE1)

3 Isn't it amazing how much stock we put into what teams we root for? I caught myself trying to frame an argument for not rooting for the *spit* Dodgers. LOL Raiders. Sharks. Giants. Yay!

Posted by: Ted at April 19, 2004 07:12 AM (blNMI)

4 Oh happy day! go annika and go dodgers!

Posted by: Scof at April 19, 2004 07:48 AM (XCqS+)

5 Yes, Dodgers-Giants is definitely one of the great rivalries, but nothing else comes remotely close to the Sox and the Yankees: that's metaphysical, on a whole other plane. Unless you're a part of it--unless you've melted into the mob at Fenway or, um, that other place somewhere in the Bronx--you simply cannot understand. It is NOT pretty. It's really quite scary. But that said, Dad's from Brooklyn, and though he never forgave them leaving, he still couldn't hate them for it. Go Dodgers! I'll take my Sox over them in the World Series if it comes to that (and my adopted state's Marlins in the NLCS), but for now I can have my cake and eat it too.

Posted by: Dave J at April 19, 2004 01:01 PM (VThvo)

6 Go Dodgers!! #$%@ the Giants. The A's are a respectable team that you can be proud of, even though the pitchers don't hit.

Posted by: Steve S. at April 19, 2004 09:26 PM (AT2MA)

7 See what I mean annika? Dodger fans have no class.

Posted by: Ted at April 20, 2004 07:14 AM (blNMI)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Don't we all?

That's a text-sex quote from David Beckham, star of the kick-ball team Real Madrid. i'm not a big kick-ball fan, but i am curious as to how Beck can accomplish those things without using his hands.

Beck is a Sinatra fan too, i see. He also cracks on Singaporean men, how rude.

Alerted to this bit of naughtiness by Breanagh McTavish.

Posted by: annika at 06:26 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.

i thought tonight might be an appropriate night to re-post my one and only baseball related sonnet:

More: The very prolific Scorebard says it in haiku.

Posted by: annika at 09:41 PM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.

i was so happy to see Phil Mickelson finally win a major, and in such an exciting way last Sunday. His family had a tough time last year, but he never whined about it or used it as an excuse for not winning. He seems like a really great guy.

And his favorite dish happens to be lobster ravioli. i love lobster ravioli, too. i had a great one in San Francisco last weekend. Here's a recipe i googled, from Emeril. i may give it a try someday when i'm feeling ambitious. With lobster meat, not live lobster, of course. i'm too squeamish to kill the poor things myself.

Posted by: annika at 07:24 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 115 words, total size 1 kb.

i can't wait for baseball season to begin. One reason is my new, as yet untested, secret fantasy baseball player ranking system. After two sub-par finishes in Yahoo! Fantasy Baseball leagues, i have decided on a more scientific approach. Okay, quasi-scientific. i don't have enough free time to develop a really scientific system.

Because i love you, i'm going to let you in on it. The system is based on the fact that the Yahoo! public leagues rely on only five offensive* stats: batting average, runs, home runs, RBIs, and stolen bases. The fantasy baseball guides out there (i'm using Lindy's) have their own ranking systems that take into account additional stats that are irrelevant to the Yahoo! leagues. Therefore i didn't think the comprehensive rankings should be trusted to pick the most useful players according to the more limited Yahoo! categories.

Another important point, of which all fantasy baseball players are aware, is that you are forced to pick players from each position category. Catchers are, by nature of their position, going to produce lower stats in the five categories, than say outfielders. Unless you get someone like Pudge, but there's only one Pudge. Still, you are forced to fill one spot on your lineup with a catcher, and there are only a few quality catchers out there.

If there are 12 teams in the league, chances are i'm not going to get Pudge. Some other fool is going to try to draft him in the first round, so i'd never put him on my list. i need to figure out a way to pick the best player with regard to the five categories, but a player that the other league members might overlook.

For example, here's how the Lindy's guide ranks catchers:

1. Mike Piazza


2. Javy Lopez


3. Jorge Posada


4. Ivan Rodriguez


5. Mike Lieberthal


6. Jason Varitek


7. A.J. Pierzynski


8. Jason Kendall


9. Ramon Hernandez


10. Bengie Molina


11. Paul Lo Duca


12. Charles Johnson


13. Benito Santiago


14. Jason LaRue


15. Toby Hall

1. Ivan Rodriguez


2. Jason Varitek


3. A.J. Pierzynski


4. Javy Lopez


5. Jorge Posada


6. Mike Lieberthal


7. Jason Kendall


8. Ramon Hernandez


9. Benito Santiago


10. Bengie Molina


11. Jason LaRue


12. Paul Lo Duca


13. Greg Myers


14. Charles Johnson


15. Mike Piazza

What i do first is determine the top ten players in each statistical category. i do it a little different than most statistical tables, so my list yields a few more players when there's a tie. Normally, the statistical tables will count each tied player towards the total ten in the top ten. So you'll might see numbering like: 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 6, 7, 7, 7, 10. Since i don't care how many guys are on the list, as long as their stats are in the top ten, i won't skip over numbers like that. Thus, if there's any ties, my list would include guys who might be lower on another statistical list. Using the example above, my list might look like this: 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, and so on. Using my system, the tenth player on ESPN's or Lindy's list would be the sixth player on my list in the above example.

i do this ranking for each offensive category that Yahoo! uses. This way, i can see if a player will help me in stolen bases for example, even if his sucky stats in other categories make him less desirable in non-Yahoo! leagues. i don't really care about a guy's on base percentage or his total hits, since Yahoo! doesn't use them.

Once i find the top ten stats for each category i assign a cutoff number, which is the tenth stat in the list. For instance, the tenth highest amount of runs by a catcher (using my top ten list) was 52, by Cincinatti's Jason LaRue. Then i go through the list of all players in a specific position and assign a point to any player who's stat for that category is in the top ten for other players within that position. (It does no good to rank, say catchers against outfielders on stolen bases; you'd never see a catcher in the top ten.) Therefore, i would give one point to all catchers with 52 or more runs.

Once i go through all five stats, on all players in a position, i get a number ranging from zero to five. Additionally, i'll give a break to guys who are close to the top ten in a certain category, or who did poorly due to injury, yet had a good 2002 season. Instead of a point for that particular stat, i'll give those guys a "+." If a player has a plus, he will automatically move to the top of the list for players with his 1-5 point total. For instance, Mike Piazza got only one point from my system (his batting average was in the top ten for catchers last year), but i gave him a "+" in three other categories because of his past performances. That put him at the top of all the other “one point” guys on my list.

Here's my catcher's list with my point system attached:

1. Ivan Rodriguez (5)


2. Jason Varitek (5)


3. A.J. Pierzynski (4+)


4. Javy Lopez (4)


5. Jorge Posada (4)


6. Mike Lieberthal (4)


7. Jason Kendall (4)


8. Ramon Hernandez (4)


9. Benito Santiago (3+)


10. Bengie Molina (3)


11. Jason LaRue (3)


12. Paul Lo Duca (2+)


13. Greg Myers (2+)


14. Charles Johnson (2)


15. Mike Piazza (1+)

There's still some brainwork that needs to be done. That's the "quasi" part of the quasi-scientific system. For instance, what do i do with Atlanta's catchers, Eddie Perez and Johnny Estrada? Eddie is ranked higher than Johnny on my system, but Johnny is expected to be in the starting lineup this season. Obviously i'd want Johnny rather than Eddie, since he'll have more at bats. That's where my system needs some tinkering.

Another potential flaw is that my system relies on the previous year as a predictor of future performance perhaps too heavily. The sophmore slump isn’t taken into account, nor are potentially good rookies or veterans who are on the downhill side of their careers. i try to minimize this by adding or withholding a “+” when the opportunity exists.

But all in all, i think my secret system is good for identifying the dark horses among the rankings put out by the magazines and websites. It's time consuming to go through all the positions and assign points, then rank them. i've been doing it little by little for the past few weeks, during my breaks at work.

i think i'll put Jason Varitek or A.J. Pierzynski at the top of my draft list as catcher, since they seem to have been under-rated by both Lindy's and Yahoo!'s ranking systems. Actually, i had A.J. on my last two fantasy teams and he's always been good to me. Now that he's on the Giants, i have another reason to like him.

On the other hand, Varitek is a solid player on an American League team that will be a contender again next year. His power numbers are better than A.J.'s but his batting average is not as good. They each crossed the plate 63 times. Tough choice; i can't decide yet. Tune in later if you're curious. i'll post a link to my team on the sidebar, like i did last year.

* i haven't used my system for pitchers, but the same concept should probably work on them, with a few adjustments to distinguish the value of relievers as opposed to starters.

Posted by: annika at 10:43 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 1405 words, total size 8 kb.

1 Quite a passionate presentation. I'm willing to bet that there are also magazines out there (or soon to be published) that can also help in ranking players. Good luck to u!

Posted by: Mark at March 28, 2004 03:49 PM (Vg0tt)

2 Another baseball fan at MuNu! Alrighty then! I'm doing an analysis on the greatest hitters of all time over at my joint. Come by and let me know what you think. I was going to try to do a fantasy league myself, but I think I'll miss the boat this year. Maybe I'll just watch your team and see what the hell is supposed to happen!

Posted by: Madfish Willie at March 28, 2004 05:46 PM (lZgx6)

3 damn that's alot of analysis. ...damn... ...you should put LoDuca higher up since he is going to have a breakout year, plus he'll probably get some time at 1b and OF too. Good hitter, good guy. i'm biased because he is a dodger as you know. public league? i did a private one last year but no one besides mean really played in it the lazy bastards...

Posted by: Scof at March 28, 2004 09:00 PM (uluG3)

4 Lo Duca? Yah right, just as soon as Beltre has his long awaited break out year. i won't hold my breath.

Posted by: annika at March 28, 2004 09:23 PM (O3Pis)

5 Annika where were you when I needed you to help me prep for my own baseball fantasy league? I was wire to wire last place last year, and hoped to improve this year. If I had had access to your super secret system I might have done better in my auction on Saturday. Alas, another season is wasted for me.

Posted by: The Maximum Leader at March 29, 2004 05:17 AM (MeCkf)

6 A heads-up to fellow annika denizen baseball nuts about the kick-ass documentary Up For Grabs, which I had the pleasure of seeing at a film festival a few weeks ago. The film is about the battle for the Bonds #73 home run ball between Patrick Hayashi and Alex Popov. Although perhaps SFers and ex-SFers like annika are sick of the story, the documentary is quite fascinating and extremely entertaining. I'm not entirely sure if it has a distribution deal yet, but hopefully someone will pick it up (ESPN? PBS?) and make sure itÂ’s shown somewhere, somehow during this year's baseball season.

Posted by: robofrost at March 29, 2004 09:00 AM (OPYfK)

7 They both will be great this year! I guarantee it!

Posted by: Scof at March 29, 2004 11:34 AM (XCqS+)

8 How about that Cubs pitching staff. Kinda frightening.

Posted by: Mark at March 30, 2004 04:14 PM (Vg0tt)

9 i've always hated Greg Maddux. He's so smug.

Posted by: annika at March 31, 2004 09:15 AM (zAOEU)

10 ugh! My season is already ruined. I knew Prior might be gimpy going into the season, but now I find out that he's going to be out for months and not weeks. D'oh. You've got a great ranking system, btw.

Posted by: Trevor at March 31, 2004 03:33 PM (COhUH)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

What makes Anna grimace?

Besides the fact that she couldn't hack it as a pro, now there's this.

Posted by: annika at 04:20 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.

Ha Ha Ha Ha!

Bye bye Stanford, you were so overrated!

i love it. Oh baby, ain't second round upsets a bitch?!

Now that the season's over for him, maybe Josh Childress is free to go make the next House Party movie.

Woooo hoooo!

Posted by: annika at 05:17 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.

AstroTurf maker Southwest Recreational Industries is going out of business. Professional athletes and their knees have every right to be happy about this. As a sports purist, i believe football and baseball should be played on grass, not carpet, and i hope that no other companies sprout up to replace SRI.

Posted by: annika at 01:53 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.

Howard Dean is the Dan Jansen of American politics. Remember Dan Jansen, the speed skater? He was supposed to win every race, but he kept falling down. He wouldn't quit, though.

Posted by: annika at 02:15 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Yeah, except Dan Jansen actually won something at the end.

Posted by: glenn at February 17, 2004 03:26 PM (JWs/7)

2 How about another Dan, Dan O'Brien of the Reebok "Dan vs. Dave" ad fiasco?

Posted by: Scof at February 17, 2004 04:59 PM (Me9IN)

3 Dan O'Brien also eventually won the gold (1996) as well as three world championships. He also held the world record for a while.

Posted by: Kurt at February 18, 2004 11:14 AM (/7AX2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

New England 32, Carolina 29. The Pats win by one field goal. i said they'd win by two. The Pats didn't cover the spread. i said they wouldn't. i told you to take the Panthers plus 7 points. i hope you did. Did you take the over? i should have told you about that too.

i am awesome!

It was actually a pretty good game, too. Good defensive play in the first half, big offensive plays in the second. i was cheering for both offenses in the fourth quarter, because i wanted my predictions to come true. My friends were looking at me funny.

When New England made that 2 point conversion, i thought i would have a push, but then Carolina tied it up and i knew i was golden. Didn't i point out that Vinatieri was going to be key? Yes, i did.

i am so awesome!

P.S. i missed the whole halftime tittie fest, since i was out on a beer run. i can't stand Janet anyway and Justin bugs me. Apparently, Zomby wasn't impressed. And Shae's blog has good coverage of the er, uncoverage.

i did catch the National Anthem and was gratified to see Beyonce sing it with grace and dignity, unlike her ass-shaking spectacular from last Fourth of July in front of General Grant's tomb.

Link thanks to Michele.

Posted by: annika at 07:39 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I think Yahoo may have it wrong; that move looked deliberate to me, and I thought (although the camera was pretty far back) that she had her nipple covered with latex or something.

Posted by: Matt Rustler at February 01, 2004 08:23 PM (of2d1)

2 I am finished with my rant, so I thought I'd check out what you had to say about the halftime show. The Houston paper has a pic that shows that she was wearing a flesh colored cloth over her mammary projectile. The CBS Sportline poll asking which moment is the most memorable called what happened a "wardrobe malfunction." Uh, yeah. How can something planned be a malfunction? I know so many kids who were watching that show. I am so disgusted. I thought Janet had more class than that. She had said that she was going to have a special surpise guest at the show and I guess the surprise guest was her "exposed" breast. Does Michael Jackson need his sibling to expose herself in front of millions of people right now? Is that helping his case? Okay. I'm finished... I have to calm down and get to bed. I have to work tomorrow and a job interview Tuesday (yay!). You didn't miss ANYTHING during the halftime show.

Posted by: Shae at February 01, 2004 09:10 PM (9lKAK)

3 Surprise, surprise, surprise... CBS says they knew nothing about the incident and Justin says it was an unfortunate accident. I looked at the picture again and really couldn't tell if anything besides her hand was covering herself, but still... I am interested in knowing, if it was a wardrobe malfunction, what WAS supposed to happen when he reached over there? How is it that he grabbed and pulled the fabric so hard that it ripped off -- and it was an accident? Hmm... I'm sure this will get more interesting over the next few days... and look for a skit on Saturday Night Live soon.

Posted by: Shae at February 01, 2004 09:26 PM (9lKAK)

4 I'm following Annika for all my football betting needs next year. Do you do NHL, too? As for "wardrobe malfunction", I call bullshit. That was planned, she had the tassle on, and it was simply meant to be controversial. I've already said my piece on my overall feeling on the subject, but to lie about it afterward is just pathetic. Heh. Not that I have an opinion on the subject...

Posted by: zombyboy at February 01, 2004 09:42 PM (X7Bhq)

5 Yes, yes, the Jacksons are all freaks. I question how any of those poseurs ended up on stage in the first place. Now Toby Keith would have given us a powerful and emotional halftime instead of banality. As for the game... One rarely sees such pathetic officiating in the NFL. The fix was in. If you don't believe me, TIVO back to the last NE TD, and watch the receiver as he comes off the line, grabs the DB and shoves him to the ground before running 25 yards down the field to make the catch. Pathetic.

Posted by: Casca at February 01, 2004 09:51 PM (RXTfP)

6 Ha ha Shae. "Mammary projectile" is a good one. Zomby, i know about as much about hockey as i know about football. Casca, if Toby Keith had been doing the halftime show, i might have stuck around for it.

Posted by: annika! at February 01, 2004 10:27 PM (doUdg)

7 This sort of thing is becoming more common for has-been stars. first the Britteny Madonna kiss now this. Their overwhelming lack of talent is not keeping them in the spotlight so they have to do something.

Posted by: Stephen Macklin at February 02, 2004 07:58 AM (UquFN)

8 hell. i didn't even know they were still playing football this time of year. who was playing anyway? :-) arf coyote

Posted by: coyote at February 02, 2004 03:42 PM (cfoFZ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Many people have wondered why i haven't posted my prediction for today's [Most Excellent] Bowl game. (Okay, one person wondered.) So here it is.

Carolina Panthers vs. New England Patriots. Funny, neither team represents an actual state, just a large region. New England is favored by 7 points. The field is neutral of course, since the game is being played at Reliant Stadium in Houston. But i heard somewhere that Carolina has never practiced on artificial turf until this week. That sounds funny, but if it's true could it factor in somehow?

Friday, Rush Limbaugh said the game will be close. He picked the Patriots, but didn't think they'd cover the spread. That makes it very tempting for me to predict that the Patsies will cover.

It's really not that hard of a game to handicap, though. Tom Brady, besides being just about as adorable as any football player i've ever seen, can also show flashes of greatness on the field when it counts. And don't forget that NE has Vinatieri and [Most Excellent] Bowl experience on their side.

So, i say Carolina won't roll over, but New England will pull it out by six. Therefore, take the Panthers and the 7 points, if you get the chance.

Posted by: annika at 12:29 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 210 words, total size 2 kb.

Comic, and big fat idiot, Al Francken took down a heckler at a Dean rally yesterday.

'I got down low and took his legs out,' said Franken afterwards.

Wise-cracking funnyman Al Franken yesterday body-slammed a demonstrator to the ground after the man tried to shout down Gov. Howard Dean.

'I'm neutral in this race but I'm for freedom of speech, which means people should be able to assemble and speak without being shouted down.'

Posted by: annika at 09:22 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 122 words, total size 1 kb.