just trying to eat my waffles

December 02, 2005

Quotable Quote Of Today

[The] irony in all these death-penalty stories: A media that typically sees Born-Again Christians as suspect suddenly finds the Born-Again Christian a nobel [sic?] figure. Listen, I have no truck with Born-Agains and I hold them suspect as well, but I find this odd: Having blood on your hands is a forgivable offense; trying to hang the Ten Commandments in a public school makes you a threat to society.

Posted by: annika at 08:35 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.

November 29, 2005

If i Had A Blog

by annika b.

If i had a blog i would write about only shiny things
like my hair, or your nose

If i had a blog i would post naked pictures all the time
but of you

i would also post drink recipes,
and then drink them while blogging

If you had a blog you would name it after my cat, if i had a cat

If i had a blog i would write stupid free verse while listening
to my professor, and the boy with slightly wavy hair
who only raises his hand when he has something funny to say

Having a blog would be like being a superhero
but without the costume or the cool powers
i would wear boots and my underwear would be on the outside.

Posted by: annika at 10:20 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 140 words, total size 1 kb.

November 22, 2005

Shout Outs To The New Lawyers In The Blogosphere

Congratulations are also in order for Law Fairy, The Angry Clam, Chris Cross, and GirlGoneMil, who passed the California Bar Exam. And i should also mention that my roommate Megan is the smartest, sexiest and most relieved new lawyer in the Golden State. And on Saturday, she was the most hungover too.

i know it's bad form to mention it, but good luck to those of you who didn't pass. i know you'll get em next time.

Posted by: annika at 06:21 PM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.

November 11, 2005

Happy Veteran's Day

A Happy Veteran's Day thank you to all veterans! And a belated Happy Birthday to the U.S.M.C.!

Check out Blackfive today. Uncle Jimbo has a great post. And contribute to Project Valour IT.

Posted by: annika at 06:57 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.

November 10, 2005

Comments Problems

i have been frustrated with the comments being down, too. For some reason, the whole of Munuviana has been hit hard recently. Pixy is on it, as he always is, but as you know he's only one man. Superhuman yes, but still only one man. Here's some interesting facts that might shed light on things or at least help us all to be patient:

We got 1.3 million trackbacks over the past 30 days, and 550,000 comments. About 99.8% of trackbacks and over 90% of comments were spam. Over 99% of the spam got blocked, but that still left a lot of cleaning up.
. . .
Massive amounts of comment spam coming in right now - several thousand a minute. Busy upgrading Fluffy's armament. Back soon.
Ugh. Seriously ugh. We're talking over a hundred comments a second here.
Update: New super doom-Fluffy installed. We'll see how we go with that.
Update update: 75,000 80,000 85,000 spams from a single source in under 90 minutes. It would have been more than that except that the server ground to a halt under the load. It's sped up significantly now that it's all being blocked immediately.
Update update update: Out of 90,000 95,000 spams, four actually got through. Congrats to Ted, Linda, Daniel and Lawren, who won the prize.
Update^4: 100,000! It's now 104 minutes since the flood started
Update^5: Looks like it's leveled off at a steady 1500 spams a minute. I wonder how long they'll keep up this futile exercise?
Update^6: Just past the two hour mark and it seems to have stopped. 123,111 spam attempts, four of which got through, for a success rate of 0.00324%. I shall now delete those four spams... And done.
. . .
We have to move off Movable Type; we have no choice in the matter. However, no-one will be forced off MT before they're ready. The new servers will be able to cope with the existing users just fine; the problem is that further growth will bring serious problems. We're already the largest MT installation in the world, and worse, we are stuck on version 2.6 due to licensing issues.

Posted by: annika at 09:38 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 361 words, total size 2 kb.

1 This is precisely the reason I moved platforms. When I realized that every morning I was waking up to stave off a new spam attack--and that if I didn't do it, the spammers were able to take down the server every morning--I realized that I simply couldn't stay with MT. As much as I had enjoyed the ride, I hated having to spend so much time fighting the spammers.

Posted by: zombyboy at November 10, 2005 09:59 AM (1yNBe)

2 Yes. Come over to the dark side of WordPress.

Posted by: Robbie at November 10, 2005 12:50 PM (lbWbV)

3 Ordinarily, I would think of a male named "Pixy" as being more well versed in show-tunes than in being a Warrior King, I have to give him credit there.

Posted by: skippystalin at November 10, 2005 04:21 PM (ohSFF)

4 As you know, Annie, someof the other blogs have these weird distorted letters you have to match before it will allow a comment to be sent. I think that effectively blocks the spammers.... Maybe they should use that system???

Posted by: shelly at November 10, 2005 04:40 PM (6mUkl)

5 One advantage annika has in Munuvia is everything is free. Server space, tech support...all kindsa shit. It's perfect for a starving law student: No money down, no montly payment...heck, tell me who couldn't afford that!

Posted by: Victor at November 10, 2005 05:33 PM (l+W8Z)

6 Definitely can't beat free. I believe the tool shelly is referring to is called 'captcha,' where you have to type in a random combination of a word and numbers. I've heard other bloggers say it's highly effective; but I've only seen that on Expression Engine blogs...

Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at November 11, 2005 07:31 AM (Wz2Gp)

7 I stand corrected; the captcha tool is also available from Pmachine Pro...

Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at November 11, 2005 07:33 AM (Wz2Gp)

8 Of course, pMachine and EE are from the same company. We use EE, and the captcha thing really does work. Comment spam went from ten or twenty a day to zero immediately. Then, the trackback spam started...

Posted by: buckethead at November 14, 2005 11:02 AM (ztNrs)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Money Quote Of The Day

Or, yesterday, rather:

For several years, these people have been testing the water, trying to gauge the size of the lies they can get away with. Unsurprisingly, theyÂ’ve come to realize that, if they all simply insist on the Â“truthfulnessÂ” of a given lie of their own creation and marketing, that little piece of the greater war narrative will, with the help of a compliant media, slowly ossify into Â“factÂ”Â—or at the very least, will dig beneath the skin of settled history and fester there, constantly picked at by the conspiracy theorists and fantasists who stroke their own egos by pretending to know more than the surface reveals.

Yes. Yessssss!

Posted by: annika at 07:13 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.

November 09, 2005

U.S. Marine Corps Stamps

JCrue has pictures of the new distinguished Marines stamps. Nice.

Posted by: annika at 10:00 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.

November 08, 2005

Essential Riot Reading

i know everybody's been pimping the 2002 Thomas Dalrymple article on the Parisian suburbs. i found it via A Nation Of Riflemen. If you haven't yet read it, believe the hype. It's one of the most interesting things i've read all year.

Kevin Kim links to it too. But Kevin has much more on the riots, including English translations of some French sources i had seen elsewhere. Not knowing French, i'm thankful to Kevin for doing the work. Just keep scrolling down on his blog. He'll like that.

Posted by: annika at 07:18 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Kevin says that there are constant police surveillance of the Muslim people. Every source I have read over the past few years says that there is no police presence in Muslim areas and that is one of the main reasons for the riots. The area has been in violent chaos for years. Where does Kevin get his information?

Posted by: Jake at November 08, 2005 07:59 PM (r/5D/)

2 If you go to here, you will see a great map of the areas under attack in France. http://timblair.net/ee/index.php/weblog/splendid_integration/ Notice how concentrated the attacks are along the Riviera in Southern France. I have been there a number of times and I have rarely seen a Muslim there. The Al Qaida types must have moved a number of troops there with the purpose of scaring the hell out of the tourists and devastating the tourist industry. I was in Nice last May (I had no choice). The hotels seemed empty. I talked to a hotel manager and he says the Americans are staying away. That was great news to me as it showed that our boycott of France is working. Muslim attacks on resort towns combined with the ongoing American boycott could be a deathblow to thousands of hotels and cafes in France.

Posted by: Jake at November 08, 2005 08:18 PM (r/5D/)

3 Jake, It's not my own claim; it's very likely something I translated from an article. In my translation of the Laurent Mucchielli interview, I did add the following note: [NB: The sociologist is blaming the police, at least in part, for the electrocution deaths of the two youths. I disagree. While the sociologist may have a point about how a community might curdle under excessive police surveillance, we have yet to establish that the surveillance in the French banlieue has been excessive, given the banlieue's nasty, decades-old reputation. Perhaps it was the police's fault; perhaps it wasn't. I'd need to do more research before coming to my own conclusions.] At this point, I have no clear impression as to how much or how little police surveillance there is in the banlieue, so I've made no claims about it. If you read Dalrymple's article, you get the impression that the police dip into the banlieue only to knock heads on occasion; it is, otherwise, a lawless zone. If you believe Mucchielli, however, you get the impression that disaffected French youths are constantly on the run from the police, though it's not clear whether Mucchielli is referring only to the Paris banlieue, or to minority-heavy locales all over France. I'm still forming impressions of the situation, so please offer me some interpretive charity, as the philosophers say. When I make some definite factual claims, I'll be sure to make them loudly. Heh. Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at November 08, 2005 11:39 PM (1PcL3)

4 Oh, yes: thanks for the shout-out, Annie. Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at November 08, 2005 11:40 PM (1PcL3)

5 Kevin: OK. Here is what I think Muccheilli is referring to. Whenever Muslim youth leave the Muslim area and come into the "white" areas, they are under constant police surveillance. And from this surveillance, the conflict arises. Especially, since the youth control the streets in their own area.

Posted by: Jake at November 09, 2005 02:12 AM (r/5D/)

6 Jake, Thanks. I forgot to answer your question about sources. It's only one source, for the moment: I've been reading and hastily translating articles from the online version of L'Express, which is found here: L'Express Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at November 09, 2005 03:16 AM (1PcL3)

7 Do you know about Dalyrmples online magazine? it is great, here it is: http://www.city-journal.org/ The French, and the low countries are screwed. The only way to get their nation back would be to round em up and deport them wholsale. Or at least break up the enclaves, make them live all spread out. and deport any Iman who calls for seperatism or violence. Or, they could all become Nazis, that would work too.

Posted by: Kyle N at November 09, 2005 03:24 AM (KMYax)

8 Jake is pleased that the American boycot of France is working ! What a ludicrous and petulant response. Just because france did not want to go charging into George bush's persoanl war with no plan for re-construction hardly means the economy of the country should be targeted and several ordianry frenchies put out of business. This is just another example of bullying American foreign policy pursued by narrow-minded reactionary fools blinded by patriotism. If a country does not agree they must pay the price.

Posted by: Chirac and roll at November 09, 2005 06:09 AM (ZW3Pf)

9 Blah blah blah zzzzzzzzzz clunk.

Posted by: annika at November 09, 2005 06:21 AM (406JA)

10 Chirac: France is an outlaw nation and should be boycotted by everyone who believes in freedom. Here are the reasons: 1. There is a real possibility that Saddam would not capitulate because he was confident that the countries he had bribed, France, Germany, Belgium and Canada would have stopped the US. 2. Saddam was selling a large quantity of oil to ELF, a French-government controlled oil company, for 30 cents a barrel. And ELF was reselling that oil for $30 a barrel. This in return for blocking UN action against Saddam. 3. Saddam had signed contracts with ELF that gave them exclusive right to Iraqi oil production. This would have made ELF one of the largest companies in the world. Those contracts would only take effect when France got the sanctions against Saddam lifted. 4. France was selling weapons to Saddam all during the boycott. Anti-aircraft missiles were found that had a ship date 3 months before the liberation of Iraq. 5. Many French government officials took bribes from Saddam to keep him in power. 6. French journalists took bribes from Saddam for favorable news articles. 7. France has practiced apartheid against their own Muslim citizens. Anyone who believes that France should not be boycotted for these actions has no humanity.

Posted by: Jake at November 09, 2005 07:09 AM (r/5D/)

11 Saddam went to the brink because he was sure that France and Russia would not let America attack him under any circumstances, a miscalculation that was well fed under the Clinton Administration. I believe that if France and Russia (and Germany) had joined the coalition openly and early, we'd never have had to go there. Saddam would have caved and allowed inspections and we'd still be playing cat and mouse with him, while he got even richer on the food for oil scheme. Are we better off now or the other way? Sooner or later? Me, I think we are going to prevail here and that hoistory will show that Bush was the one to stand againt radical Islamofascism. He's still a hero to me.

Posted by: shelly at November 10, 2005 07:59 AM (6mUkl)

12 The passing fancy may not be with our boy at the moment, however I like to bitchslap non-believers with the Lincolnian fact that it was the REAL Americans serving in the army in the field, who re-elected him in 1864, while the yapping curs/chattering classes were fawning over Little Mac.

Posted by: Casca at November 11, 2005 08:26 AM (qBTBH)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Cotillion Ball

Stacy at Not A Desperate Housewife did a beautiful job on today's Veteran's day theme Cotillion Ball. Please go check it out.

Posted by: annika at 07:04 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.

November 05, 2005

Project Valour-IT

Allow me to quote Beth from My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy regarding this worthy fundraising effort:

I'm writing to ask for your support for a project sponsored by Soldiers' Angels (click for more information on SA, if you aren't familiar with them) called Project Valour-IT. This project is designed to provide voice-enabled laptops for severely wounded military members. From the Project Valour-IT website:

'Project Valour-IT, in memory of SFC William V. Ziegenfuss, provides voice-controlled software and laptop computers to wounded Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines recovering from hand and arm injuries or amputations at major military medical centers. Operating laptops by speaking into a microphone, our wounded heroes are able to send and receive messages from friends and loved ones, surf the 'Net, and communicate with buddies still in the field without having to press a key or move a mouse. The experience of CPT Charles "Chuck" Ziegenfuss, a partner in the project who suffered hand wounds while serving in Iraq, illustrates how important this voice-controlled software can be to a wounded servicemember's recovery.'

Right now there is a major fundraising effort ongoing among blogs, with certain blogs assigned to different service branches, to make it a sort of friendly competition. . . .

In previous generations and wars, all Americans were asked to sacrifice for the overall war effort, but during this war on terror where we are ALL affected, we haven't had to shoulder the burden that our military (active, reservists, and their families) have. May I ask you to sacrifice just a bit for the good of our troops?

i've selected the Army team. Please help out, for those who have given so much for us.

Posted by: annika at 12:33 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 281 words, total size 3 kb.

November 03, 2005

Attention McGoohan Fans

Regarding this crazy secret CIA prison story, Varifrank reaches for the obscure "Village" reference first. Damn, i should have done that. [i'm such a sci-fi geek, i love that show. Best episode, The Schizoid Man.]

Posted by: annika at 03:29 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.

1 When I saw Thailand on the prison list; I knew that the MSM had got the story wrong once again. There are a number of countries, Thailand is one of them, that are taking the offensive on Al Qaida. They are not pulling the covers over their faces like the wimpy europeans. These countries are allowing the CIA to question their Al Qaida prisoners in their local prisons. This allows the CIA to piece together the world-wide operations of Al Qaida. This is important as an Al Qaida technique is to run a terrorist operation in one country from another. MSM wants you to believe that we are in this terrorist war by ourselves. But there are 103 countries cooperating with us in killing or capturing Al Qaida. Almost all signed on after we liberated Iraq. They realized Bush was serious about going after Al Qaida. They knew Clinton wasn't.

Posted by: Jake at November 03, 2005 04:07 PM (r/5D/)

2 I AM NOT A NUMBER, I AM A FREE MAN!

Posted by: Kyle N at November 03, 2005 04:48 PM (vt0fT)

3 I'm gratified that "...rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." Clearly these fellows need to be kept somewhere, much as we kept the old Nazis, where they could do no harm, and where we might extract information. Torture? These people aren't sophisticates. You isolate them for a couple weeks. Wear them down mentally. Wire them for sound. Spike their OJ with some Everclear, and toss a compadre in their cell. You won't be able to shut them up. On the other hand, I'm disappointed since this was my screenplay idea for season six of 24. Russian guards are the best. They're preconfigured for cruelty, work for vodka, and they don't like Moslims.

Posted by: Casca at November 03, 2005 04:58 PM (qBTBH)

4 Hmmm....The Schizoid Man as the best episode? It's not bad, but there are several that are better--for instance, the ones with Leo McKern as Number 2 (Chimes of Big Ben and the two penultimate episodes), It's Your Funeral, and Many Happy Returns. Take my comments with a grain of salt; my personal favorite is frequently cited as one of the worst episodes by lots of people: the western Living in Harmony (mostly because of Alexis Kanner's acting job as The Kid.). Great googley moogley, I need a life.

Posted by: Victor at November 04, 2005 06:12 AM (L3qPK)

5 i like Chimes of Big Ben, and of course the obvious choices are the last two episodes, but Schizoid Man is all about an elaborate mind-fuck. They bring in another #6 to try and confuse our boy into thinking that he's not who he thinks he is. By the end of the episode even i get confused about who is who and what is what. It also contains a quote that i always think about when i'm at IHOP. "flapjacks are my favorite dish. flapjacks are my favorite dish." Yes, i bet i'm weirder than you, Victor.

Posted by: annika at November 04, 2005 07:02 AM (Dztge)

6 Schizoid Man is also my favorite episode. I also like the finale. Talk about a mind-fuck! McGoohan had to go into hiding because people were so upset over it. My brother was an extra on the movie A Time to Kill. He ate lunch with McGoohan one day. As they ate, my brother said to him, "My brother Chris has every episode of The Prisoner on tape. He recorded them from A&E. He's a big fan of your show." McGoohan, without looking up, said, "They're a strange lot, aren't they?"

Posted by: ccs178 (Chris) at November 04, 2005 08:17 AM (B5UVm)

7 cool story. i feel the urge to write McGoohan haiku. Victor?

Posted by: annika at November 04, 2005 09:24 AM (zAOEU)

8 Yep, that's a great story. I wonder what Mr. McGoohan referred to when he said "they" though? The episodes, or the fans? And "Living In Harmony" is more of a mind-fuck, IMHO, for both the Prisoner *and* the viewer. Bet those folks who tuned in a bit late the first time it was ever broadcast were wondering, "WTF?" Be careful about who you're trying to out-weird, annika. Remember I consort with rats :~) A McGoohan or Prisoner haiku contest? Sure, I'm in. We can have two prizes: The Annika Prize, which I'm sure will be a date with Annika (all expenses paid by the winner, because you're a starving law student), or something from her store...I'm not sure which...and the Victor Prize, which will be an unopened DVD copy of the Crispin Glover version of "Willard" if I can find that copy my bro mailed to me, not knowing I got a copy the day after it came out. Be careful to limit winners to CONUS--that show has lots of overseas fans who know how to use Google.

Posted by: Victor at November 04, 2005 09:57 AM (L3qPK)

9 how about no prizes except bragging rights. But McGoohan was in several great things. Silver Streak, one of my bro's favorite movies. he did a couple of really good Columbo episodes. he was creepy as the warden in Escape From Alcatraz, too.

Posted by: annika at November 04, 2005 10:33 AM (zAOEU)

10 Hey, it's your contest, kiddo. Tho you may be missing out on the opportunity to scam a lobster dinner out of some sucker. I liked Ice Station Zebra, myself, as well as his cameo in The Simpsons.

Posted by: Victor at November 04, 2005 10:34 AM (L3qPK)

11 Dont forget his best movie roll as Longshanks in Braveheart.

Posted by: Kyle N at November 04, 2005 05:07 PM (ivOMb)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

November 01, 2005

Cotillion Ball

i've neglected to link the Cotillion Ball in a few weeks, so let me remedy that right now. This week's ball is over at Portia Rediscovered, a fellow Munuvian. i like all the pictures, way cool.

Posted by: annika at 06:24 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.

October 31, 2005

Take The Hewitt Poll

Take the Hugh Hewitt poll on Judge Alito.

Posted by: annika at 03:51 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Heh, the ponk doesn't have AJ listed under blogs! I voted too.

Posted by: Casca at October 31, 2005 04:07 PM (qBTBH)

2 I'm calling hugh tomorrow; that sucks. Annie gies him props all day long and he4 IGNORES the girl. We'll fix that.

Posted by: shelly at October 31, 2005 06:12 PM (6mUkl)

3 Another neo-con Nazi!

Posted by: Robert McClelland at October 31, 2005 06:52 PM (V2eAR)

4 WISHES DO COME TRUE! ROBERT McCLELLAND: As far as who Bush puts on the SC, my hope is that itÂ’s the craziest fucker American conservatism has to offer. And I hope that this wacko sets about destroying America. That would give Canadians one more reason to never vote Conservative in this country ever again. Then the Chimperor nominates craziest fucker American conservatism has to offer. ScalitoÂ’s extreme right wing record Â…ALITO WOULD OVERTURN ROE V. WADEÂ…ALITO WOULD ALLOW RACE-BASED DISCRIMINATIONÂ…ALITO WOULD ALLOW DISABILITY-BASED DISCRIMINATION Lets hope the Reich Whingers can ram this nomination through the system so that the new Supreme Court of Bush can get to work destroying America before our election next spring. History will view this as both a failed attempt to control governments and legislation, and a significant step in the downfall of the once powerful Catholic church.-- From the great Stageleft

Posted by: Robert McClelland at October 31, 2005 06:59 PM (V2eAR)

5 Mr. McClelland, After deliberating the merits of your post, I have soberly concluded that...... http://gogglesdonothing.ytmnd.com/

Posted by: reagan80 at October 31, 2005 07:19 PM (K9tdw)

6 Annie: Where have these lefty crazies come from? Are you associating with an unsavory element in law school? You are losing control here. Back to censorship. Nah, better yet, let's just ignore them, maybe they'll go away. S.

Posted by: shelly at October 31, 2005 07:37 PM (6mUkl)

7 Hehehehehe, this is fucking fantastic. I love that answer, "Yes, the longer a law has been around the more powerful it should be viewed as a precedent." Sounds about right to me! All that new shit put on the books over the past fifty years can be wiped the fuck off now, mwahahahaha!!!

Posted by: Casca at October 31, 2005 07:48 PM (qBTBH)

8 Where's the pussy laugh?

Posted by: shelly at November 01, 2005 05:19 AM (6mUkl)

9 Didn't scare enough small children last night, so you've got to come back and haunt me?

Posted by: Casca at November 01, 2005 06:45 AM (qBTBH)

10 Hewitt's writing polls? I thought he was supposed to be protesting the White House over Miers until he was arrested.

Posted by: dawn summers at November 01, 2005 03:52 PM (SOf9N)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

October 30, 2005

My Blog Is Worth...

Any takers?

My blog is worth $305,980.68.
How much is your blog worth?

It must be my Sacramento location.

Via Old Skool at Stop the Bleating.

Posted by: annika at 07:46 AM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 33 words, total size 1 kb.

October 05, 2005

Lying Is A Nasty Habit

One of the central characteristics of the left is the ease with which they lie. A website whose purpose is to direct trolls to right wing blogs had this to say about me:

AnnikaÂ’s Journal - This lovely lady says Al Gore is Â“fatÂ” and Â“tackyÂ” Possibly her body is thin, but her brain spews nothing but vile bile. IÂ’m confident that she is as tacky as it gets.

i once called Gore a "fashion disaster," but i never called him tacky. If you do a search using the search function at the bottom of my sidebar, you will easily find that the word "tacky" has never appeared on this blog before today.

Why lie, when the truth is so easy to find out? Because lefties know that most people won't go to the trouble to research things. This "tacky" lie is just a small example, but if you've been listening to the news lately you'll find many more examples of lefty lies that are much more disturbing.

It's also funny that my blog has been pigeonholed as a "right wing" blog. Sure i'm proudly conservative, but i don't blog about politics exclusively. Lately, i don't even think politics makes up half of what i write about. And how many right wing bloggers can say that they have turned over their blogs to left wing guest bloggers for a whole week, as i have. Twice.

You may also notice that it takes a heck of a lot for me to ban any troll, or to interfere in the comments section at all. Sometimes i think i should be more strict, but i truly believe in Ronald Reagan's precious ideal, "the marketplace of ideas." It's ironic that the one website which exhorts lefty trolls to go forth and comment, does not itself allow comments.

i like to think i do things differently here, but you wouldn't know it by reading what that lefty troll clearing-house blog says about me.

Hat tip to Six Meat Buffet.

Posted by: annika at 10:33 PM | Comments (18) | Add Comment
Post contains 342 words, total size 2 kb.

1 They treated you with kid gloves, you should see what they write about people like David Horowitz, Michelle Malkin, and Hugh Hewitt. Vile, Mean, Disingenuous, hate-filled, sophomoric, traitorous, wrathful, elitist, and contemptuous. This describes the modern day American Left. Its really sad.

Posted by: Kyle N at October 06, 2005 03:48 AM (0Zt6B)

2 Annika, some folks wouldn't know class if it bit 'em in the ass. You rock. "Tom" just a schmo in a choir

Posted by: Thomas C. Wyld at October 06, 2005 05:02 AM (ZY8Xq)

3 Fuck. Old Skool and I aren't even influential enough to get a write-up. Truth hurts.

Posted by: Matt at October 06, 2005 06:41 AM (10G2T)

4 "A website whose purpose is to direct trolls to right wing blogs" So that's where these guys come from. Ever so often these trolls act like Messerschmitt 109s to come out of the blue and take their best shots on the blogs I read. I like to shoot them down with my P-51 comments by pointing out the poverty, despair and desperation the left have brought to minorities around the world. Remember that any publicity is good publicity. Plus they give your readers some war game fun.

Posted by: Jake at October 06, 2005 06:42 AM (r/5D/)

5 My dear, NEVER run for public office. You are far too thin-skinned. As Kipling said, more or less, the only way to deal with lies or hating is not to deal in kind. These people are mere pimples on one's virtual ass, who with proper hygiene will not become anything worse. It is after all an imperfect world. "...it takes a heck of a lot for me to ban any troll, or to interfere in the comments section at all. Sometimes i think i should be more strict, but i truly believe in Ronald Reagan's precious ideal, 'the marketplace of ideas.'" That was the first thing that I ever noticed about you. You have the strength to allow things to stand of their own merit so that others may decide. It is a very rare quality.

Posted by: Casca at October 06, 2005 08:16 AM (qBTBH)

6 And why in the world would she WISH to go into politics?! Been there, done [with] that. I find music composition infinitely more rewarding, sane and, honest, honest. Keep your thin skin, Annika. Heart and sensivity still matter. Tom aka a schmo in a choir

Posted by: Thomas C. Wyld at October 06, 2005 10:16 AM (qmjZ7)

7 I'm not sure it's real productive, but I feel the need to point out that lying is not the exclusive province of the left. For example: President Bush went around for a long time talking about how he had said in a Chicago speech that he'd preserve the budget deficit except in case of war, recession or national emergency. He then joked that he never imagined he'd hit the trifecta. It was a great laugh-line, and he repeated it for months, even after The New Republic, among others, had asked the White House to document the speech the President was quoting. They'd searched -- speeches of Presidential candidates are pretty well documented -- and came up empty. The White House press office never could find a specific citation. The President's story was, in a word, a lie. It's not a big lie -- certainly not on the scale of condensing "fasion disaster" to "tacky"-- but it's the kind of thing that the President and his people do all the time. The current administration's respect for the truth is exemplified by Condi Rice's explanation of the yellowcake uranium glitch in the SOU; she said it was "technically true," because the President hadn't said it was true, he'd said that the British said it was true. Uh, OK, I guess. True, but hardly honest. My point is that hyperbole and outright slander are not isolated on the left. You're more sensitized to bad behavior on the left because you're on the right. I'm on the left, and I just lived through an election where a war hero was smeared with charges that he had earned his decorations with self-inflicted wounds, and where self-declared patriots mocked wounds suffered in combat by decorating themselves with Purple Heart Band-Aids. You might remember that the right made a lot of money selling videotapes that accused President Clinton of Murder. Empty invective is a hallmark of American politics these days. Everyone does it. The fact that you can only hear it coming from one side doesn't mean the other side isn't doing it. It just means you aren't an honest listener.

Posted by: Tom at October 06, 2005 01:24 PM (pMzgj)

8 There you go lyin', "war hero". I can see how draft dodging fucktards could paint him as such in their romantic fantasies, however those who served in any real combat arms capacity know the type, medal hunter. Lots of real heroism goes unrecognized everyday, shooting the wounded and writing up your own "heroic" acts aint it. You can lie to your wife. You can lie to the IRS, but don't lie to yourself.

Posted by: Casca at October 06, 2005 01:58 PM (qBTBH)

9 TOM, I will concede to you that there was a lot of Clinton hate, and some Kerry hate (not that he didn't deserve it after slamming combat vetrans before congress). But the Bush hatred is several orders of magnitude greater. And one thing that makes it worse is that back in the Clinton days, the people calling him a murderer and such were mostly talk show hosts and some fringe elements. Republican politicians critisised him but were much more circumspect. But now, you have high ranking democrats including the head of the DNC accusing Bush of the most insane conspiracy crap. Also, at no time in the 200+ year history of our country has any other sitting President had his foriegn policy slammed by a former president, on foreign soil at that! Its reprehensible.

Posted by: Kyle N at October 06, 2005 03:00 PM (3Yf+L)

10 The carefully reasoned argument of Casca would seem to demonstrate my point: Viciousness knows no party or political orientation. Casca: We can debate Kerry's war record all we want, but one thing is undeniable. He volunteered twice for service in Vietnam. That's two times more than the combined total of President Bush, Vice President Cheney, John Ashcroft and Paul Wolfowitz. One might imagine, as a patriot, that you would afford Senator Kerry the same respect you'd afford any combat veteran. But no: In the world where you, Casca, exist, patriotism and heroism are the sole property of Republicans. I give you as futher examples Max Cleland and the marvelous moment when Ollie North lectured Daniel Inouye, who lost an arm in World War II, on the nature of patriotic sacrifice. As for Kyle, the main profiteer on the Clinton/Murderer front was Pat Robertson, who was at the time much more than a "fringe element" in the Republican Party. You dismiss Clinton hatred as if it were some minor media fuss. Were you alive during the Clinton years? Do you remember Tom DeLay condemning Clinton on the floor of the house while American troops were in harm's way, saying that the only reason they were dying was to distract the country from the really, really important issue of Monica Lewinsky? Way to cheapen the sacrifice of the troops, Mr. DeLay! You want 100 more examples? I'll give them to you. As a Christian and a family man, I can't turn on the TV at night without hearing how I'm against God (because I don't want prayer in schools) and anti-family (I don't believe reproductive decisions should be made by government) and unpatriotic (I think the President ought to get his facts straight before he drags us into a war -- a war which, by the way, I supported). I'm pretty familiar with the slurs of the right. I'm sure you're familiar with the slurs of the left. I don't think it's productive to argue about which side is worse; they're both bad. Our political culture right now stinks. But for every Kos you revile, I'll give you one Little Green Footballs. We can pile up the list of offenses all night and accomplish absolutely nothing. The point is that neither side is in a position to display the kind of no-self-awareness sanctimony in Annika's posting, blaming one side and one side only for something that is endemic and threatening to our political culture. It offended me when I first read it and it still does. But somehow, lefty liar that I am, I've managed to get through this without callling anyone a "fucktard." Must have been some horrible oversight.

Posted by: Tom at October 06, 2005 06:59 PM (M7kiy)

11 Is that windy ass Strawboy posting here under another nom de plume? Let me tell you Tommyboy, you have stumbled in where angels fear to tread. I won't waste my time fisking your dumbass, but will simply state that the only sailors who were ever in "Harms Way", were the corpsmen with the Marines, the Seals, and those stupid fucking naval aviators. They rest are a bunch of phony poseurs. That's why that weak ass Borda blew his brains out in the CNO's garden. They caught him with a combat V for valor on his Navy Commendation Medal, and someone had the temarity to ask, "How the fuck did a sailor get that?" It was his bravest act. Too bad Kerry doesn't have those kind of stones.

Posted by: Casca at October 06, 2005 09:02 PM (qBTBH)

12 PS, I don't parlay with fucktards, fucktard. Now get your ass out of my beachfront community.

Posted by: Casca at October 06, 2005 09:07 PM (qBTBH)

13 I think we all realize that neither the Communists nor the baby seal clubbers have a corner on Truth and Goodness. And anyone who believes that one party is Good and one is Evil must be a...a Communist. (I'm trying to call everyone Communists, including Annika, so that I can qualify for the Lefty List.) But, on to more important things...why didn't the Lefty List say anything about the hot tub? A glaring omission!

Posted by: Ontario Emperor at October 06, 2005 11:54 PM (xyGHE)

14 Simple answer: Besides being Godless, they're also unwashed.

Posted by: Casca at October 07, 2005 04:42 AM (qBTBH)

15 We own you Nazi bastards! We will crush you like the cRapitalist racist shit you are!

Posted by: cb at October 07, 2005 10:13 AM (EquoZ)

16 Tee-hee. Like you crushed those Klansmen in Greensboro in '79? Hell, at least those assholes deserved your hate.

Posted by: Matt at October 07, 2005 12:46 PM (10G2T)

17 Yikes. I prefer Hugh Hewitt's testimonial on the sidebar, and I say that as a consistent critic of you, albeit an affectionate one.

Posted by: Hugo at October 07, 2005 04:31 PM (Yu24L)

18 I must have made a mistake when I put the word "tacky" in quotes, and I will change my description. But you did say his look was "cheesy" and "Man that dude's got a big ass." Your quoting yourelf as saying "fashion disaster" is deceptive. You said "What a fucking fashion disaster." I jumped off a descriptive cliff by using 'tacky' as a way of summing up words like "cheesy" and "fucking fashion disaster." But making a leap like that is not lying - intentional deception, as you do, is lying.

Posted by: bbbustard at October 28, 2005 10:24 AM (M7kiy)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

September 22, 2005

It Was Only A Matter Of Time...

... before somebody spoofed Bob Dylan's classic "Hurricane." Check out Mister Snitch's version. It's crazy good.

Posted by: annika at 08:05 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.

September 20, 2005

The Cotillion Dolls

This week's Cotillion Ball is hosted by Beth at My VRWC, Sadie at Fistful of Fortnights, Soldier's Angel Holly Aho, SondraK at Knowledge Is Power and Jody at Steal the Bandwagon. There are many pictures, go to it!

Posted by: annika at 06:13 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.

September 19, 2005

When A Blogger Feels Like She's Down For The Count

When a blogger feels like she's down for the count, she should:

a) pick herself up, dust herself off, start all over again;

b) finally edit and post that Kill Bill 2 symposium she's been sitting on for-fucking-ever;

c) recycle old posts;

d) realize that she'll never be quite so charming, funny and cynical all at the same time as her idols Ginger, Candace or Dawn, then give up;

e) two words: sex blogging.

Posted by: annika at 08:49 PM | Comments (24) | Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.

1 darling, you have always been all that and more. don't give up! then we'll be almost all gone! and really, when we think of our sadness at no longer living in the blogosphere, you are one of those we think of first. really. in the meantime, my vote goes for kill bill 2, or gun stories.

Posted by: candy girl at September 19, 2005 08:55 PM (Cp+JE)

2 Well, that makes it 1 to about 200 for sex blogging (with pictures). Whatever you do, forget about picking football; it is definitely not your thing.

Posted by: shelly at September 19, 2005 09:52 PM (M7kiy)

3 Vintage boxing photos like that will keep me coming here.

Posted by: Chris at September 20, 2005 04:02 AM (fdN2d)

4 Only Democrats quit when they're down.

Posted by: Victor at September 20, 2005 04:36 AM (L3qPK)

5 pick self up and start blogging again. +1 only demonrats quit when they are down. keep pluggin along something will click. r

Posted by: r at September 20, 2005 06:14 AM (nVuk6)

6 Do what you have always been doing. I have always been impressed with your breath of your knowledge and interests. And that has brought me to your blog often. Please keep giving us pleasant surprises.

Posted by: Jake at September 20, 2005 06:36 AM (r/5D/)

7 Annie, Your usual alacrity is not necessary; I would read a shopping list posted on your site, and be sufficiently entertained. Please keep blogging and know you have die-hard fans. Mark W

Posted by: Mark W at September 20, 2005 07:01 AM (yTuVc)

8 f) Realize that she's already as charming, funny and cynical all at the same time as her idols, and keep on truckin'. Take a break to recharge batteries if necessary.

Posted by: Matt at September 20, 2005 07:39 AM (10G2T)

9 Hey is it time for another Annika Jepordy??? (that is once you get some new batteries or your batteries recharged or whatever the current holdup is...) After all I almost got one of the last ones right.

Posted by: Drake Steel at September 20, 2005 08:04 AM (M2tSh)

10 Nice one Shelly. Kick the girl when she's down. If anything we need MORE football. I live for the weekend just around the corner when the clay feet of the Trojans will be exposed. Yes, we need more boob shots.

Posted by: Casca at September 20, 2005 08:22 AM (qBTBH)

11 Your breasts of knowledge have kept me coming often. Please keep it up.

Posted by: d-rod at September 20, 2005 08:23 AM (o2s7U)

12 Write about anything... and don't worry about going through a dry patch. All bloggers do. I just blither on about my injuries until I feel suitably inspired. You are witty and charming and playful. You were the first person to comment on my blog two years ago, and the first person I linked to. And if you do do sex blogging...

Posted by: Hugo at September 20, 2005 08:49 AM (MG0tp)

13 Miss Annika, Write about whatever you wish, as often or as seldom as you wish. Don't worry about us; if you have fun writing that's all that really matters. One thing though; if you can blog while having sex then we really need to get you some more creative (& physically active) partners.

Posted by: Publicola at September 20, 2005 10:44 AM (vC8Ev)

14 Is Heather in the Cotillion? She pulls down about $5 million a year: [deleted]

Posted by: Casca at September 20, 2005 04:53 PM (qBTBH)

15 Just find something new to obsess about, like the upcomeing Serenity movie and the show that spawned it, Firefly.....I'm just saying..... Seriously, that's my current obsession so you should feel free to pick your own. We will follow you down whatever strange or dark path you choose.

Posted by: TBinSTL at September 20, 2005 06:47 PM (Vq/8g)

16 I LOVE it when I'm censored! Who knew that you'd draw the line at linking to Heather Brooke's very tasteful website?

Posted by: Casca at September 20, 2005 09:55 PM (qBTBH)

17 i can't allow any links to someone with bigger tits than me.

Posted by: annika at September 21, 2005 01:24 AM (j+KCy)

18 "Tasteful" get it? Don't worry, she got them out of a box.

Posted by: Casca at September 21, 2005 07:21 AM (qBTBH)

19 Um.... I'm new here, is this something we get to vote on?

Posted by: Mr. Snitch at September 22, 2005 11:21 AM (2CNDQ)

20 I obviously missed something. Slump? No slump is forever. As Chuang-tzu said, "When the dick flaps in one direction, it must eventually flap in the other." Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at September 24, 2005 08:51 AM (1PcL3)

21 I checked out Heather Brooke's site - great, now I have another stretched out pear of underwear.

Posted by: Radical Redneck at September 24, 2005 10:40 AM (7XTy8)

22 Well... There IS something to be said for sex blogging. Remember that bit I posted about the effects of semen on women's happiness that you linked to? I'm STILL getting hits on that post via your link, months later.

So...make of it what you will.

Posted by: Desert Cat at September 24, 2005 11:23 PM (xdX36)

23 that makes me happy. : )

Posted by: annika at September 25, 2005 12:08 AM (Ez/ng)

24 What kinds of comments are these?

Posted by: www.free sex stories at November 12, 2005 03:09 PM (AqDGi)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

September 14, 2005

Light Posting

i took on a project at school that will me keep me very busy over the next several weeks, so posting will be sporadic. If you're hungry for poetry i'd suggest visiting the following fellow poetry lovers: Sarah or Sheila or Dymphna and the Baron (Get well soon, Dymphna) or CBass (The Mark Russell of the Blogosphere) or my buddy Matt or Jeff's Protein Wisdom, none of whom have any poetry posted today. However, you can always count on Hugo for great poems on Thursday. If you're coming here for a gun nut update, i should have one soon, but you might want to check out this gun quiz at Risawn's blog. (i recognized the BHP.)

Posted by: annika at 09:51 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.

September 10, 2005

Just One More Reason i'm Glad To Be A Munuvian

Blogger has instituted a quasi-censorship program.

When a person visiting a blog clicks the "Flag?" button in the Blogger Navbar, it means they believe the content of the blog may be potentially offensive or illegal. We track the number of times a blog has been flagged as objectionable and use this information to determine what action is needed. This feature allows the blogging community as a whole to identify content they deem objectionable.

This disturbing development is totally separate from their policy regarding spam blogs. This is much more big brotherish.

Blogger excuses this quasi-censorship by referring to the "Wisdom of Crowds" concept. That's complete bullshit. They might have an argument if they gave readers the option to designate a blog as "unobjectionable." But even that would be problematic, because it's always more likely that a offended person would be motivated to click on a flag than someone who's not offended by content. You're going to see a situation where hypersensitive people or those with intolerant political viewpoints will have a kind of "hecklers veto" on blog content.

This is a bad idea, and totally goes against what i thought was Blogger's most important asset, the total freedom it gave to its users. It's also an unnecessary idea. Blog readers have always had a remedy for objectionable content they might happen upon. It's called the back button. Blogger's "Flag Button" is the blogging equivalent of yelling "Mom!" everytime your brother calls you a ninny.

If someone doesn't like what i write for instance, they can always leave a comment, or email me, and then never visit again. If i want to post a picture of my left tit, i'm glad i have the freedom to do so without becoming some kind of second class blog-citizen.

Posted by: annika at 11:44 AM | Comments (22) | Add Comment
Post contains 313 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I think I've finally figured out your picture. You're holding a handgun with both hands.

Posted by: Victor at September 10, 2005 12:27 PM (l+W8Z)

2 Remember, Blogger is owned by Google.

Posted by: David Foster at September 10, 2005 01:44 PM (7TmYw)

3 As much as I agree with your sound reasoning, you might change your mind a bit if you were to go to www.smithantics.blogspot.com. (I am my blog buds at www.sixhertz.blogspot.com refer to it as "shitantics." I suspect you would be clicking the "Flag" button, too, but maybe I'm wrong.

Posted by: Mark at September 10, 2005 01:48 PM (Vg0tt)

4 Of course I looked. That's how you seperate the goats from the goatblowers. You ARE aware that Cal is thumping the shit out of the Huskys? Isn't it about time for some football posts? In case you've forgotten, the Buckeyes are going to have the Longhorns for dinner tonight, after which I plan on being more insufferable than usual for the remainder of the season.

Posted by: Casca at September 10, 2005 02:18 PM (qBTBH)

5 Casca, that's got to hurt.

Posted by: MarkD at September 10, 2005 09:02 PM (X9njN)

6 And I have the freedom to ask you what film is this from: "Oh, I've been to Prague. Well, I haven't "been to Prague" been to Prague, but I know that thing, that, "Stop shaving your armpits, read the Unbearable Lightness of Being, date a sculptor"

Posted by: Jake at September 10, 2005 09:02 PM (r/5D/)

7 I guess it depends upon how Blogger uses its power...and how the flag is used. If Blogs For Bush or moveon.org orchestrates campaigns to flag blogs with particular political views, or if Hamas or Focus on the Family orchestrates campaigns to flag blogs with particular religious views, then hopefully Blogger will detect the scam and ignore it. However, if true grass roots flagging occurs (can true grass roots flagging be statistically identified?), then perhaps a few "induce sexually abused children to make nuclear bombs and target people of color" blogs will disappear. I do wish, however, that the "Flag" button wasn't so prominent. In addition, the purpose is not intuitively apparent - if I hadn't read the fine print, I would have thought that "Flag" could be used to mark blogs that I *like*.

Posted by: Ontario Emperor at September 10, 2005 09:31 PM (VaRkg)

8 Yeah, Casca, loooks like someone else's Ox got gored. Texas will be in Pasadena on January 4. Then they wil find out what the QB-less wonders of Strawberry Canyon will learn on November 12, and Oklahoma learned last January. There is only one # 1 in College Football. Learn the word: "THREEPEAT"

Posted by: shelly at September 11, 2005 07:15 AM (6krEN)

9 i don't know who's more insufferable, SC fans or Buckeye fans. Sheesh.

Posted by: annika at September 11, 2005 08:34 AM (6i+B+)

10 Anyone who watched the game KNOWS who dominated. If there was a Heisman player on the field, it was AJ Hawk. Vince Young got his ass beat, and the TD that kept them alive was the product of an officiating fraud call of non-existant pass interference. Texas benefited from bringing their officials all night. All-in-all, Tressel's misplaced confidence in the choke-meister Justin Zwick fundimentally cost us the game. In keeping with the freedom of speech subject: USC sucks horsecock.

Posted by: Casca at September 11, 2005 09:07 AM (qBTBH)

11 Heisman, you want to talk Heisman? Go back to Strawberry Canyon on November 12 and you can see Heisman. Already one winner plus one nominee will be on the field that day; most likely two more future winners will be there as well. (Keep your eye on John David Booty) As for the horsecock stuff, I guess you are starting to retrogress already, getting ready to take off your shirt and put on your blue paint. That sounds pretty sophomoric. I was in Miami in January, watching all the Sooners and Boomers file out of the stadium starting at halftime; by the time the fourth quarter started, most were gone, looking for something to do in Miami that would give them relief from pain. If I were a Bear, I'd be looking for something else to root for; Women's soccer and volleyball might be a good place to start. As my eleven year old grandson would say "Trojans rule; Bears drool".

Posted by: shelly at September 12, 2005 03:49 AM (6krEN)

12 Its not being insufferable when you are correct about being best....

Posted by: Mythilt at September 12, 2005 06:31 AM (i/gV3)

13 Doesn't anyone care how annika's fantasy baseball team is doing?

Posted by: Victor at September 12, 2005 06:40 AM (L3qPK)

14 blogspot is free to most users. They do you delete the blog, just delist it from their own personal advertisments. Though it could eventually be delisted from google, though I do not think that is happening now.

Posted by: cube at September 12, 2005 06:56 AM (nyNr0)

15 Shelly needs his meds adjusted.

Posted by: Casca at September 12, 2005 07:28 AM (qBTBH)

16 There is a fairly simple corrective measure, if you're a Blogspot blogger: turn off the nav bar in the template. Then there's no "Flag" button to press.

Posted by: Kevin Baker at September 12, 2005 04:20 PM (BiMLC)

17 When I see posts about the Bears wiinning and Texas losing, I figure someone needs his eyes corrected. No matter; we have several quarterbacks, maybe you guys can buy one, kind of like buying a vowel? Note to Ah-nika; please, do not take that as an invitation to sponsor another stupid game. I have work to do.

Posted by: shelly at September 12, 2005 07:13 PM (6krEN)

18 When I see posts about the Bears winning and Texas losing, I figure someone needs his eyes corrected. Texas won't lose until January 4, 2006. Cal will be lucky to be undefeated before November 10. No matter; we have several quarterbacks, maybe you guys can buy one, kind of like buying a vowel? Note to Ah-nika; please, do not take that as an invitation to sponsor another stupid game. I have work to do. P.S. Casca, why not watch Saturday night; does ABC-TV reach to where you live?

Posted by: shelly at September 12, 2005 07:16 PM (6krEN)

19 You sir, are clearly, waaaaaaay out there. Take a breath and pray that those chuckleheads make it through an undefeated season. If the Bears, Irish, or the Bruins grow some gonads, you could see your beloved Trojans getting a good assfucking before they get to the Rose Bowl. We happen to have two extremely good QB's, but only one of them played Saturday, and only sporadicly. I have no reason to believe that someone won't humble Texas before we reach December. An undefeated season requires more than weak sisters, it requires luck. Texas can't take their officials with them everywhere.

Posted by: Casca at September 13, 2005 09:42 PM (qBTBH)

20 Why not? We do.

Posted by: shelly at September 14, 2005 05:45 AM (ywZa8)

21 Wasn't there something about a tit...?

Posted by: Telesonic at September 19, 2005 02:31 PM (blNMI)

22 I was hoping the "left tit" link would be a picture of a bird. Text is no fun!

Posted by: Sigivald at September 19, 2005 04:50 PM (4JnZM)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

116kb generated in CPU 0.0669, elapsed 0.1568 seconds.
75 queries taking 0.1118 seconds, 330 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 10563
Files: 87
Bytes: 96.8M
CPU Time: 9:20
Queries: 598867

Content

Posts: 2168
Comments: 17090

Feeds

December 02, 2005

November 29, 2005

November 22, 2005

November 11, 2005

November 10, 2005

November 09, 2005

November 08, 2005

November 05, 2005

November 03, 2005

November 01, 2005

October 31, 2005

October 30, 2005

October 05, 2005

September 22, 2005

September 20, 2005

September 19, 2005

September 14, 2005

September 10, 2005

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds