October 31, 2005

Take The Hewitt Poll

Take the Hugh Hewitt poll on Judge Alito.

Posted by: annika at 03:51 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Heh, the ponk doesn't have AJ listed under blogs! I voted too.

Posted by: Casca at October 31, 2005 04:07 PM (qBTBH)

2 I'm calling hugh tomorrow; that sucks. Annie gies him props all day long and he4 IGNORES the girl. We'll fix that.

Posted by: shelly at October 31, 2005 06:12 PM (6mUkl)

3 Another neo-con Nazi!

Posted by: Robert McClelland at October 31, 2005 06:52 PM (V2eAR)

4 WISHES DO COME TRUE! ROBERT McCLELLAND: As far as who Bush puts on the SC, my hope is that itÂ’s the craziest fucker American conservatism has to offer. And I hope that this wacko sets about destroying America. That would give Canadians one more reason to never vote Conservative in this country ever again. Then the Chimperor nominates craziest fucker American conservatism has to offer. ScalitoÂ’s extreme right wing record Â…ALITO WOULD OVERTURN ROE V. WADEÂ…ALITO WOULD ALLOW RACE-BASED DISCRIMINATIONÂ…ALITO WOULD ALLOW DISABILITY-BASED DISCRIMINATION Lets hope the Reich Whingers can ram this nomination through the system so that the new Supreme Court of Bush can get to work destroying America before our election next spring. History will view this as both a failed attempt to control governments and legislation, and a significant step in the downfall of the once powerful Catholic church.-- From the great Stageleft

Posted by: Robert McClelland at October 31, 2005 06:59 PM (V2eAR)

5 Mr. McClelland, After deliberating the merits of your post, I have soberly concluded that...... http://gogglesdonothing.ytmnd.com/

Posted by: reagan80 at October 31, 2005 07:19 PM (K9tdw)

6 Annie: Where have these lefty crazies come from? Are you associating with an unsavory element in law school? You are losing control here. Back to censorship. Nah, better yet, let's just ignore them, maybe they'll go away. S.

Posted by: shelly at October 31, 2005 07:37 PM (6mUkl)

7 Hehehehehe, this is fucking fantastic. I love that answer, "Yes, the longer a law has been around the more powerful it should be viewed as a precedent." Sounds about right to me! All that new shit put on the books over the past fifty years can be wiped the fuck off now, mwahahahaha!!!

Posted by: Casca at October 31, 2005 07:48 PM (qBTBH)

8 Where's the pussy laugh?

Posted by: shelly at November 01, 2005 05:19 AM (6mUkl)

9 Didn't scare enough small children last night, so you've got to come back and haunt me?

Posted by: Casca at November 01, 2005 06:45 AM (qBTBH)

10 Hewitt's writing polls? I thought he was supposed to be protesting the White House over Miers until he was arrested.

Posted by: dawn summers at November 01, 2005 03:52 PM (SOf9N)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
17kb generated in CPU 0.0188, elapsed 0.0713 seconds.
62 queries taking 0.0634 seconds, 171 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.