Vote For Me
Here's something new. I got nominated for something or other. I don't know what happens if you vote for me, I didn't read the thing too carefully. Anyways, you should vote for me. It requires a login, but you can use "guest" as the ID and "guest" as the password, then look for my post called "The End Of The CD Era" and rate it as a "5."
1
I love you, but it appears that "guest" is only allowed to vote once.
Posted by: d-rod at November 29, 2006 09:08 PM (T10K4)
2
Well, if you vote, make sure you hit the 5 rating. I think the default is 3 so you have to select 5. You can always go back and change it.
Posted by: annika at November 29, 2006 09:26 PM (oantJ)
3
I done my duty. One vote really gives you a boost. Let me know if you want me to stuff the ballot box.
Posted by: Casca at November 29, 2006 09:51 PM (2gORp)
4
It's blog # 15 for those who don't want to have to read all the other sub-standard quality stuff...
Posted by: shelly at November 30, 2006 09:39 AM (0Co69)
5
I applied for my own login and have yet to receive my password. On my part, it's not for lack of trying.
Posted by: Victor at November 30, 2006 11:24 AM (WHtgF)
6
don't bother with that, victor, just use guest/guest
Posted by: annika at November 30, 2006 11:47 AM (zAOEU)
7
I logged in as a "guest" this morning, but it looked like nothing happened when I submitted my rating.
Setting up a Paypal "tip jar" thingy here would probably be more rewarding than whatever that poll is offering to the winner. With that, we could then have a bidding war against Casca for the honorary title of Annika's "Alpha Bitch Supreme." If I win, my email address will be changed to annikasalphabitchsupremereagan80@lycos.com
Posted by: reagan80 at November 30, 2006 11:52 AM (wkyrW)
Posted by: gcotharn at November 30, 2006 12:18 PM (xq9zD)
9
Down boy! I already saw you sniffing Moxie's hiney. If I'm not mistaken, you proposed marriage. Seems kinda desperate proposing to a woman with cats on her blog.
Posted by: Casca at November 30, 2006 12:19 PM (Y7t14)
Posted by: reagan80 at November 30, 2006 05:32 PM (pTNVX)
14
Since Casca mentioned "sniffing hineys", I guess I'll flaunt the newest addition to my DVD collection. There was a lot of sock puppet molestation going on at the Westminister show.
Posted by: reagan80 at November 30, 2006 06:18 PM (vdQ23)
15
OK, Annie.
we need a new post on Ohio State v. USC; the old one is gone and we all need to talk shit about Columbus, and the sieve defense that Michigan picked through...
Posted by: shelly at November 30, 2006 07:13 PM (SLFj+)
16
Dammit Shelly, expand your interests a bit. RR just pointed out Shitney's C-section scar. I totally missed that first time round. I missed the flab on her inner thighs too. I'm lucky that way.
You're right Reagan. You didn't propose, it was some other idiot, or perhaps the voices in my head. There's nothing more alluring than a desperate woman with cats entering middleage. You were definitely sniffing though.
Posted by: Casca at November 30, 2006 09:33 PM (2gORp)
17
i don't know why guest guest doesn't work, the instructions say it should. oh well. if you're really motivated, you can register for real. But it's a sacramento bee website, so i don't know why you'd want to. except to VOTE FOR ME!!!
Posted by: annika at November 30, 2006 10:15 PM (oantJ)
18
Casca wrote: There's nothing more alluring than a desperate woman with cats entering middleage.
Are you always so kind, or was this a special occasion?
Posted by: Moxie at December 01, 2006 12:58 AM (tUFhb)
19
Annie:
Voting is closed, so well meaning folks need not register until next time.
Next time, Annie, read the instructions; that's what they teach us in law school, remember?
Looks like you tied for first in percentage, but someone loaded the votes a little better than you did; had twice as many voters. Loading votes is what they teach us in the legislature. That's next for you, I predict.
Casca, ease up on the cat lovers; they can't take it. Pick on someone your own size.
Posted by: shelly at December 01, 2006 03:58 AM (YadGF)
20
Reagan, what can I say? You brought the lovely, talented, YOUNG, ATTRACTIVE, Moxie over here... FOR ME TO POOP ON! LMAO, gawd I love that DVD.
Moxie, what kind? Oh, the kind with no regard for the truth? That would be Shelly, and with the aid of modern medicine, I understand that he is occasionally capable of simulating something akin to sex... coitus... the act of love.
Now as for my comments, they were directed to the taunting of Reagan80, but since you asked... lose the aire of desperation, and the cats. Then change the modern legal system where men have no rights after they say, "I do".
Posted by: Casca at December 01, 2006 09:01 AM (Y7t14)
21
Whew, DONE!!!
Don't ever ask me to do anything ever again.
That site is difficult to use. I gave you a five.
I'll send some traffic your way from IMAO to see if that might help.
Good Luck.
Posted by: RightWingDuck at December 01, 2006 09:24 AM (1AWMf)
Posted by: Scof at December 01, 2006 12:44 PM (a3fqn)
23
"Reagan, what can I say? You brought...."
Just to set the record straight; No, I did not tattle to Moxie.
She found that out on her own.
Posted by: reagan80 at December 01, 2006 03:58 PM (cVvWB)
24
I was setting up a joke you silly git... FOR ME TO POOP ON!
Posted by: Casca at December 01, 2006 05:27 PM (2gORp)
25
Jesus, how long is the line for folks to take credit for offing Erin Brockovich out of the Beverly high case?
Skip Miller says it was him , and I know my partner, Chris Brisbois did the environmental legal work, and now I read some other dude says he did the lifting.
The way I heard it, they simply fabricated the evidence. or tried. Mssry's dead, so we can't disbar him and Erin isn't a lawyer.
So, Annie won't be like either; dead or a non-lawyer. She's gonna be a force, and probably she'll be the one pooping on Casca. That is, if he survives January 8.
Posted by: shelly at December 01, 2006 05:58 PM (YadGF)
Posted by: annika at December 01, 2006 08:01 PM (oantJ)
27
LMAO, Shelly, ya gotta rent the DVD. That is if you're not bleeding from the rectum manana.
Posted by: Casca at December 01, 2006 08:49 PM (2gORp)
28
"...and if I survive July 24-26!"
Piece of cake, Annie. Typing or writing?
Heck, it almost got up to 50% last test. We're toughening it up just for you...
Posted by: shelly at December 02, 2006 08:26 AM (0Co69)
It was a solemn pledge, repeated by Democratic leaders and candidates over and over: If elected to the majority in Congress, Democrats would implement all of the recommendations of the bipartisan commission that examined the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
But with control of Congress now secured, Democratic leaders have decided for now against implementing the one measure that would affect them most directly: a wholesale reorganization of Congress to improve oversight and funding of the nation's intelligence agencies. . . .
. . .
"I don't think that suggestion is going anywhere," said Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.), the chairman of the Appropriations defense subcommittee and a close ally of the incoming subcommittee chairman, Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.). "That is not going to be their party position."
It may seem like a minor matter, but members of the commission say Congress's failure to change itself is anything but inconsequential. In 2004, the commission urged Congress to grant the House and Senate intelligence committees the power not only to oversee the nation's intelligence agencies but also to fund them and shape intelligence policy. The intelligence committees' gains would come at the expense of the armed services committees and the appropriations panels' defense subcommittees. Powerful lawmakers on those panels would have to give up prized legislative turf.
. . .
Now Democrats are balking, just as Republicans did before them.
The decision will almost certainly anger commission members, as well as families of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks, many of whom have pressed hard for implementation of the recommendations.
"The Democrats pledged to implement all the remaining 9/11 reforms, not some of them," said former representative Timothy J. Roemer (D-Ind.), who served on the commission.
Carie Lemack, whose mother was in one of the jets that hit the World Trade Center, echoed that sentiment: "It wasn't a Chinese takeout menu, the 41 recommendations. You have to do all of them."
If you want my opinion, consolidation of oversight is not a good idea. I like redundancy. I was against the creation of an "Intelligence Czar," too. But the Democrats aren't backing away from this promise for policy reasons, it's more politics-as-usual, and juvenile back-scratching.
On an unrealted note, why is it that I can get no information from the media about what crawled up Pelosi's butt to make her dislike Jane Harman and Steny Hoyer so much? I know it's personal, but I've looked far and wide and there doesn't seem to be any investigative reporter willing to investigate this question.
Pelosi's beef with Hoyer goes back to her Maryland days, when she was the receptionist and Hoyer was the chief gofer for Senator Brewster in the 60's. I know there must be some interesting anecdotes, which would explain the animosity she's held onto for decades. But the media is hush hush.
And what's the deal with Jane Harman? I know she's not considered dovish enough, but I do suspect there's a personal vendetta there too. Pelosi is well known for holding grudges (and to be fair, suddenly letting go of grudges too), but nobody wants to dig into this story.
If anybody has seen anything interesting, send me a link. I'm just interested in political gossip is all.
1
haha, this is just sweeet
I have to use this to torture my liberal brother. In return I give you:
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-harmanpelosi21nov21,1,7489875,full.story?coll=la-headlines-politics&ctrack=1&cset=true
Personally I think Pelosi is just trying to piss off the Congressional Black Caucus.
Posted by: Stew at November 30, 2006 09:24 PM (swd4s)
2
Well Stew, that article was notable for saying absolutely nothing. How many times do I have to hear the standard Pelosi bio? And nobody wants to talk about the rift for fear that Pelosi might get mad? Does this sound like a nice lady or what? They cant even get people to say anything about her "on background." Pelosi must be worse than Torquemada, I'm telling you. There's more to this story than we'll ever know, kind of like the Paris Hilton/Nicole Ritchie fight.
Posted by: annika at November 30, 2006 10:27 PM (oantJ)
3
Annika,
I think you are being disingenuous: The draft has no traction in either party and is a non-starter. TO elevate it to anything more is sour grapes. Furthermore you interest in the non-essentials of Pelosi's back story(s) is bordering on becoming an obsessional disorder. I, who know very little about her and am no real fan of the Dem's but recognize that they are less repugnant than the corrupt RW religo-fascist scum that have been ineptly trying to run this country, will wait and see as things develop rather than view all she has done and what she might do with your jaundiced eye.
Posted by: Strawman at December 01, 2006 06:32 AM (9ySL4)
4
"corrupt RW religo-fascist scum"
Hmmmm, last I checked there have been no Wacco's under Bush's watch. And no unarmed females are being shot by snipers for having unorthodox racist views, which, BTW, are protected under the 1st Amendment - that's the one you and yours CLAIM to care about but really don't. Children aren't being ripped from their homes by jack-booted thugs and sent away to communist terror states. And, unlike Clinton, I doubt you'll see well-known criminals and terrorist being pardoned by Bush. The Clinton admin much more than this one earned the title facsist. They had no problem simply killing Americans with whom they disagreed. Oh, and not that it's relevant to this particular discussion, but the "corrupt RW religo-fascist scum" have never sold military/technological secrets to China in return for campaign money. Just sayin'.....
Posted by: blu at December 01, 2006 04:26 PM (Wn4WF)
5
They don't call her the "Wicked Witch of the West" for nuthin'.
She will only hold the disparite groups of the Demo coalition together with one skill - abject fear. She's pissing folks off already...
This wil surely be a "Do Nothing Congress".
Winner here?
George W. Bush. Stand back and watch his numbers rise as he slams the Congress for doing nuthin'.
Posted by: shelly at December 01, 2006 06:04 PM (YadGF)
6
Blu,
WACO? I guess you feel that was the state supressing religious freedom?
True, Bush hasn't pardoned known criminals. He chooses to promote them to higher office or invite them to the WH to offer advice. What did we hear Abramoff saying this week about Ralph Reed? "god, he's just a bad version of us".
And is it not totalitarianism when the government attempts to rule what goes on inside a persons body? THe chinese legislate how many babies you may have and the RR would do the same should you conceive in error.
I think state troopers all wear jack boots, Blu. ANd the only people being ripped from their homes and sent to prisons in terror states are Islamic American citizens; without charges, without indictments, without that good ole freedom the terroists hate us so much for havin. What a farce.
And lets not forget the 50 rounds fired at this fellow in NY last week, did you know that two of the cops were participants in the WACO debacle?
And lastly, congrats to the Fidel and RAul on the 50 anniversity of the formation of the revolutionary army of Cuba. "Cuba si, Yankee No!"
Posted by: Strawman at December 02, 2006 09:04 AM (9ySL4)
7And lastly, congrats to the Fidel and RAul on the 50 anniversity of the formation of the revolutionary army of Cuba. "Cuba si, Yankee No!"
Yeah, where was your paramour Fidel today? Answer: he's already taken the dirtnap. The commie shitbags are keeping it silent in a futile attempt to thwart the tsunami of capitalism that will rescue that dismal backwater.
VIVA LA CAPITALISM!
Posted by: Radical Redneck at December 02, 2006 09:33 AM (cOyko)
8
Yep RR,
that dismal backwater that that has more doctors per capita than we do, has lower infant mortality and higher literacy than we do, a school system that doesn't have to battle religious half wits that want to teach creationism, allows women full control of their reproductive systems, has better baseball with out the 100's of millions and drugs to spur the players on, and best of all when ignorant trash like you,a man who uses a moniker that speaks volumes or maybe that should be un-volumes, goes into a library they don't torture him if he can't produce a photo ID. Sit at the table you dolt and try to lean how to read: thinking, and sex with bipeds will soon follow.
Posted by: Strawman at December 02, 2006 11:12 AM (9ySL4)
9
Straw always conveniently forgets that they will kill you in Cuba if you dare disagree with their lovely government. He "forgets" because like most hard lefties, he doesn't care. The dirty secret of the left is that they believe it's ok to kill a few reactionaries in order to perpetuate the higher ideal of socialism. And that's why this sick ideology is responsible for more deaths than any other in human history.
Then of course he throws out the lies and propoganda about having more doctors per capita, better literarcy....blah, blah, blah. Wow, did Fidel send you that data himself, Straw? Memo to Straw: It's not true. Don't you get it? IT'S A TOTALITARIAN REGIME THAT RULES BY TERROR. They lie each and every day in order to stay in power.
p.s. Hey, did you notice your boy Hugo is going to try and get rid of term limits? How long before he decides it would be better for "the poor" - the poor are always the pawns for the left-wing butchers - that he be President for life? "We don't need elections. The people have decided." You've devoted your life to a sick, illiberal, and totoally depraved worldview, Straw. The men you celebrate are the worst history has to offer.
p.p.s. Better baseball? LOL. True, they have some nice players. And their team that plays together consistently might be able to beat some MLB All-Stars that are thrown together. But, they aren't going to beat our best team. (Did you even play sports, Straw? Given your politics and your anger, I suspect you got your ass-kicked a lot growing up. I've noticed that the unhappy, the weak, the ugly, and the dumb are often liberals. Why is that?)
Posted by: blu at December 02, 2006 12:06 PM (Wn4WF)
10
It looks like Straw is right. Judging from these pics, the Cubans have figured out a way to provide socialized healthcare without the long waiting lists.
Posted by: reagan80 at December 02, 2006 01:11 PM (wkyrW)
11
"goes into a library they don't torture him if he can't produce a photo ID."
Rest easy my dear anencephelic, Mother Haldol™ will free you soon.
What a freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeak!
Posted by: Radical Redneck at December 02, 2006 04:46 PM (cOyko)
12
"I've noticed that the unhappy, the weak, the ugly, and the dumb are often liberals."
Especially the dumb. And weak (minded).
Posted by: Radical Redneck at December 02, 2006 04:49 PM (cOyko)
13
Maybe, so that you can conceal it better, Palpatine had his lightsabre in two halves, one inch each sleeve, with the the one that we were treated to within the close-up containing the particular blade-generating mechanism and a good enough power cell for any minute or two of activation, with the other half, which posesses a larger power cell for any more prolonged engagement and appears just like the back of Anakin's sabre being attached eventually the location where the camera was off Palpatine.
Posted by: diablo 3 gold at December 14, 2012 01:20 AM (o0Ex8)
A Hero You Should Know
On October 16, 2006, Army CW3 Lori Hill became the latest female pilot decorated with the Distinguished Flying Cross (the first was none other than Amelia Earhart).
Back in March in Iraq, Chief Warrant Officer 3 Lori Hill, with the 2nd Squadron, 17th Cavalry Regiment, was piloting her Kiowa Warrior when the lead chopper came under heavy fire. She drew the fire away, simultaneously providing suppressive fire for the troops engaged with the enemy on the ground.
A rocket-propelled grenade hit her, damaging the heloÂ’s instrumentation, but instead of focusing on her predicament, she established communication with the ground forces and continued to provide them with aerial weapon support until the soldiers reached safety.
As she turned her attention to the aircraft, which was losing hydraulic power, the helo took on machine-gun fire, a round crashing into one of HillÂ’s ankles. Still, with a damaged aircraft and an injury, she landed at Forward Operating Base Normandy, saving her crew and aircraft.
For her actions she was presented the Distinguished Flying Cross by Vice President Richard Cheney at Fort Campbell, Ky., on Oct. 16.
“[It] was a once-in-a-lifetime thing to get the award and then have the vice president come and award it to you,” she said. “It’s just incredible for any soldier.”
Recalling that day in March, Hill reflected, “I was actually just glad I didn’t pass out and very happy I was able to help the ground guys out, and get our helicopter down safely on the ground.”
You won't see Chief Hill's face while your waiting in the grocery checkout line, and Lori Hill may not be a household name, but it should be.
Posted by: gcotharn at November 30, 2006 12:22 PM (xq9zD)
2
As a very small plane pilot who has occasionally struggled with something as mundane as the crosswind landing, I'm constantly amazed by these folks in the military, their bravado and skill. Hats off to Chief Hill.
Posted by: Mike C. at November 30, 2006 04:32 PM (Eodj2)
3
Color me impressed. I hadd a rollicking debater going at my site about whether women belonged in combat or not.
I say, absolutely!
I know I'd want this woman in combat when the chips were down!
Posted by: Mark at November 30, 2006 06:52 PM (qFpLU)
Posted by: Mark at November 30, 2006 06:53 PM (qFpLU)
5
I booked driving lessons for my daughter today. I asked for a female instructor. The owner told me he seldom has female instructors who last longer than two years because "you have to have nerves of steel." Obviously, having control over nerves isn't a problem for Lori Hill.
Posted by: Joules at November 30, 2006 07:20 PM (u4CYb)
6
Please join the Wednesday Hero blogroll at my blog. Stories like this need to be shared!
Posted by: Greta at December 01, 2006 09:32 AM (yy954)
7
Gee, I wonder, given the craven nature of those who run our armed services publicity department and their desperation for any good story to counter the sorry state of affairs in Iraq, if this gal will turn out to be another hero on the order of Jessica Lynch?
Posted by: Strawman at December 01, 2006 02:55 PM (9ySL4)
IAPNYC: I apologize for this question, but I ask everyone: the Britney or the Christina?
THE MANOLO: The Christina. There is for the Manolo no of the contest. The Christina, she is the beautiful lost waif, one who has, like the Violetta in the La Traviata fallen into the whoredom. For the Britney, this it was the sideways move.
And that, I believe, will be (and should be!) the final mention of the American Skankwoman on a's j.
1
LMAO, "fallen into whoredom", that is how so many of us get there.
The subject is SO... '90s! The question is... The Fergie, or The Shakira, or The Emma Bunton? I'll be busy thinking about that all day.
Posted by: Casca at November 29, 2006 07:28 AM (Y7t14)
2
I'm not sure I like the way The Manolo says "the whoredom" like it's a bad thing. (Of course it would be, with respect to my mother, wife and daughters.)
Posted by: Matt at November 29, 2006 02:36 PM (10G2T)
3
Emma Bunton just released her version of Petula's "Downtown" doncha know!
Posted by: annika at November 29, 2006 08:50 PM (oantJ)
4
Close your eyes and it's Aguilera all the way. The sad thing is that I saw a clip of Spears singing as a child, and it turns out that she actually CAN sing - she just CHOOSES to warble or whatever she does.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at December 01, 2006 11:48 PM (/TGZb)
Wednesday is Bad Poetry Day: PMS Poetry
The last Wednesday of the month is Bad Poetry Day, and my thanks to annika for this edition's inspiration.
Have you ever googled "pms poetry" lately? You should.
First, we discover PMS is a journal of Poems/Memoirs/Stories by women, and, presumably, for women. There are two poems in the latest online version of PMS and they're not too bad, so they will not be included today. But now you know about the number one google hit for "PMS poetry."
Of course, if you go down just a bit, you find some amateur poetry ("amateur" defined as "not professional." I'm not being insulting here).
PMS
Will you get off my back, get away from me.
ItÂ’s that time of the month, so just let me be.
I counted out eight, there was ten there instead?
On a day like today, I should stay in bed.
Oh give me a girdle IÂ’m ballooning again,
I resemble a Flintstone, not Wilma but Fred!
On my face the zits like volcanoes erupt.
Clearasil, Topex, I canÂ’t get enough.
Tomorrow IÂ’ll cramp up and wish I was dead,
This hormone imbalance makes me light in the head.
The curse of a woman in child bearing years.
Makes me want for hot flashes, is menopause near?
A warning goes out to the people near us.
Look out pedestrians, “I have P.M.S.”
If the author was trying to be light-hearted, I'd have to say she succeeded, as this is pretty funny. If she was serious, though, she failed miserably. I think it's pretty obvious she was going for humor, though you never know.
Proceeding on, we come across
PMS
Drip, Drop
There goes a blod [sic] clot.
Swish, swash
It makes a splash.
Pms is not fun,
But every girl gets one.
My period is such a curse.
I keep tampons in my purse.
Having a period really sucks.
Because when I have it, I can't fuck.
Interesting--the first image grosses men out (and some women too, I'm sure), but by the end...you've completely forgotten what the subject is. Part of it is because the meter and rhyme scheme go right down the toilet (Swish, swash/It makes a splash) but mostly because the author, in the last line, reveals the true tragedy of PMS--besides the wanting to kill the next person who PISSES! YOU! OFF!
Moving on, we find....not too much more, to be honest. You'll find some references to writers talking about their "PMS poetry" which I gather is stuff they dash off while angry or upset or...you know, PMSing...then destroy because even they realize it stinks. But not too much actual poetry about or inspired by PMS is to be found.
Most interesting, though, is an article at salon.com suggesting PMS may have driven Sylvia Plath to suicide. However, I'll leave that discussion (as well as reading the article, to be honest) for another day.
A Major Announcement From Annika's Journal
The major announcement is this: I don't wanna do any more Brittany Spears posts. After her latest stunt, it's just not funny anymore.
One of my new year's resolutions for 2005, which I managed to keep, was not to blog about Paris Hilton. Now I think it's time to stop blogging about Brittany.
It's obvious she wants to enter the public consciousness again after her marriage hiatus. So she somehow got the brilliant idea that she should hang out with Paris Hilton, and copy the queen of skank's habits. Foremost among those habits is Paris's occasional tendency to show off her twat for the camera.
But the planned crotch flash just isn't consistent with that simple image. It signals that Brittany plans to take her persona in a different direction, post K-Fed — into the realm of super-skankdom.
If I were advising Brittany, I'd say she is going in exactly the opposite direction she needs to go in order to rehabilitate her career. Even Paris knows that; witness the way she tried to close Brittany's legs in the picture above.
Publicity is publicity, negative or otherwise. Paris knows that too. But if Brittany really wants to be taken seriously, she should really take a look at how Christina Aguilera has managed her career. There's a girl who has found the happy medium between skankiness and musical talent.
Okay, maybe that's a little too ambitious for Brittany. No amount of vocal coaching would get her within one tenth of Christina's voice. But all I'm saying is, if you're going to be famous, at least be famous for something — not like Paris, who's famous only for being famous.
So if Brittany is just going to be a Paris Hilton clone, I'm not going to abet her anymore. It would only make me feel skanky by association.
1
It's the end of a skanky era. I hope Paris gets a few days off probation for good behavior.
Posted by: d-rod at November 29, 2006 12:00 AM (ATPlK)
2
Personally, I think she was just too wasted to know what she was doing, which is still way up there on the skank scale!
Posted by: Brad at November 29, 2006 02:39 AM (9ADYb)
3
All these ho bags want to do the super-slut thing because they think that is how Madonna made it to superstar status. And while that is true to an extent, Madonna, I have to admit, had something none of these imitators have, talent. She made some good songs and had a voice that while not great, was at least not whiney like a lot of female vocalists.
My favorite females now are Shakira,(but her stuf is either real good or real bad, no inbetween) and I like the new stuff Mariah Carey has (hate her old stuff)
Paris Hilton is actually so but ugly I could neither achieve nor sustain an erection even if the lights were off.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 29, 2006 04:13 AM (3QxNM)
4
It is time to open the Lindsay Lohan department in the Annika Media Empire.
Posted by: Jake at November 29, 2006 08:39 AM (V6rxT)
5
"Paris Hilton is actually so but ugly I could neither achieve nor sustain an erection even if the lights were off."
Sorry to hear that Kyle. Obviously it's true what they say about you brokeback longhorns. They make pills that can help if you ever want to fake it. BTW, I'm not a spelling maven, but it's butt-ugly, and being an ass man, I've never understood the deprecatory nature of the appelation.
Posted by: Casca at November 29, 2006 09:19 AM (Y7t14)
6
One thing about Christina: Anyone else remember a year or two ago when she wanted to be called X-tina and she dressed in such a way she wouldn't be able to get work in a Las Vegas ranch because she looked too slutty?
Somewhere, someone smacked her upside the head and told her it wouldn't work. Since then, she's tried to go for the 40's-50's era glamour goddess look, and for some bizarre reason, it seems to work on her. Plus, she really has a voice and doesn't need massive electronics to make her sound like a polished singer.
I have no such hope for Britney.
Posted by: Victor at November 29, 2006 07:10 PM (l+W8Z)
7
gees...stop calling her brittany for fuck sakes l.o.l
well...it seems that brittay is going down down down
Posted by: lux at December 08, 2006 12:07 PM (L7rSK)
MNF Week XII
Quickly. Green Bay at Seattle. Green Bay sucks hard. Ten point underdogs. I followed a pattern last time, which proved true. However, if I follow it again, the chart would tell me that GB wins, and I lose if I bet for GB. They being 10 point underdogs, the pattern breaks down. It's illogical because it tells me I must bet against GB in order to win, but there's no way I can win by betting against them if they win as underdogs. Understand? Therefore, I will assume that the pattern of WLWLWL for GB's last six MNF appearances will be broken tonight (a logical assumption, since they suck hard, see above), and take Seattle minus the points, and see what happens.
1
Flawless reasoning my dear, but what about the Hawk factor?
Posted by: Casca at November 27, 2006 09:41 PM (2gORp)
2
What is your take on the al-Maliki/Ahmadinejad meeting? On Iranian influence (covert and overt) overall?
Posted by: will at November 28, 2006 06:04 AM (h7Ciu)
3
STFU, collect your nasty smelly socks, and go the fuck away. You that feel compelled to engage this miserable piece of shit should STFU too.
Posted by: Casca at November 28, 2006 07:16 AM (Y7t14)
4
NOT-SAFE-FOR-WORK!!!1
American Skankwoman Update
http://thesuperficial.com/2006/11/britney_spears_really_wants_yo.html
It's hard to believe that I once wanted to fap to that. giggity giggity giggity
Posted by: Spanky at November 28, 2006 03:01 PM (wkyrW)
The End Of The CD Era
My parents grew up listening to the 33 rpm vinyl album. Their parents bought music in little boxes of 45 rpm records. I grew up in the CD age, which died last month on October 7th.
Tower Records, the music industry's most famous retail brand, will be liquidated beginning tomorrow (Oct. 7).
After a 30-hour auction, the process was won by the lead-bidder, Great American, who put together a consortium of other suitors who were bidding on different components of the retailer. The winning bid was $134.3 million.
“It's a sad day for the music business and I feel badly for all Tower employees," says Jim Urie, president of Universal Music Group Distribution. "Tower was probably the greatest brand that will ever exist in music retail.”
The original Tower Records was (and still is, for a few more days) located south of Downtown Sacramento, next to the Tower Theater that gave the store its name. Here's a panoramic view of the famous corner, Broadway and Land Park Drive, where the world's greatest music store was born.
When I lived in San Francisco, I used to love walking to the Tower on Columbus and Bay, where the neighborhoods of Russian Hill, Fisherman's Wharf and North Beach all intersect, and where half my music collection was purchased. I can still remember the first time I saw Pulse's blinking red diode, it was in that store.
I was a senior in high school when I stood in the Coumbus and Bay store watching the overhead tv with REM's Monster in my hand, as Joe Montana (then a KC Chief) executed his most famous two-minute drill against John Elway.
The most famous Tower Records outlet is of course, the Tower on Sunset. My parents have a cartoony lithograph in their den, all in primary colors, of the Sunset Strip at night with Tower Records in the center under an Angelyne billboard. Tower Sunset was a music industry legend.
Bruce Willis spent $15,000 in one glorious shopping spree.
Elton John was practically a regular. Mick Jagger, Ella Fitzgerald and Jack Nicholson were known to drop by.
ThereÂ’s never been anything quite like the Tower Records on LAÂ’s Sunset Boulevard. ItÂ’s been an elemental part of the cityÂ’s music scene, a place where rock stars and record company executives came to shop, mingle and check how their records are selling.
This is where Tower became a global icon.
“Probably the most famous of all the record stores,” said music executive Miles Copeland, who has overseen the careers of such bands as R.E.M. and the Police.
I've been in that store once. I didn't see any celebrities, but I was probably there on an off night. Tower Sunset was a celebrity hangout, it seems.
In-store promotions at Tower Sunset – autograph sessions and short concerts by artists such as Lou Reed and Prince – became part of the Strip’s landscape. An appearance by rock singer David Lee Roth in the late ’80s clogged the street with thousands of fans.
Titans of Music shopped there
But employees say their favorite memories are of the celebrities who dropped by to shop: Bobby Darin, Bob Dylan, Paul McCartney and many others. Stan Goman said Brian Wilson, known for his battles with emotional demons, came in a bathrobe. Actor George Hamilton once wrote a personal check to pay for his purchase and was a bit miffed when the clerk made him produce a photo ID, Goman said.
A disheveled-looking Waylon Jennings showed up early one morning, hours before the store opened. “He was still recovering from his night’s activities,” said former manager Charlie Shaw.
When another former manager, Bob Feterl, transferred to Sunset from suburban West Covina in 1989, he got a hint of the store’s significance in his first week. “I see Ella Fitzgerald walking straight toward me, and I was totally blown away,” Feterl said.
Another time, he said, a stubble-faced Bruce Willis spent hours in the store, crawling on the floor to pore over the CDs that wouldnÂ’t fit into the main stacks. By the time he was done, heÂ’d spent $15,000.
Elton John probably was Tower SunsetÂ’s most loyal fan. The store would open an hour early so he could shop in peace, often accompanied by a chauffeur or assistant.
“Elton would come in and he had an account,” said Howard Krumholtz, who recently was laid off after 34 years at Tower Sunset. “He would charge $5,000 worth of stuff. He had three houses, so he’d buy three of everything.”
In recent years celebrity sightings have become less frequent. But the stars haven’t forsaken Tower Sunset. On the outside of the building is a white billboard that says, “Shop the legend.” In the past few weeks, fans and industry types have been scribbling farewell messages on the board.
“37 years of music,” reads one of them. “This is so sad! Elton John.” Though the math was off – the store opened 36 years ago – store employees said the message is what counts.
What killed Tower Records is what killed the CD; I blame Steve Jobs. The personal computer, and now the iPod have made music store shopping irrelevant. Despite the crackdown on illegal downloading, is there anyone who can't spare .99¢ for iTunes when there's a song that you just gotta have? Adn why fight traffic and parking when you can hit Overstock.com and get what you want at a huge discount, delivered to your door? I've been doing that for years. Of course now I feel guilty; I always thought Tower would be there.
Tower Records always had the best selection and prices of all the chain stores, and when I did go out to buy music, I never shopped anywhere else. It was the only place to buy classical and jazz CDs, because that's the type of music where computer browsing just doesn't cut it. For classical especially, I really need to hold the jewel box in my hand so I can compare the different versions of the same works. And in the jazz section, I'd always check the endcaps first. Invariably, there'd be a previously unknown gem for me to discover, on sale. Try that at Borders, or Barnes and Noble. Their jazz section has what, 20 artists?
Now that Tower is gone, I think it's the symbolic end of the CD. The most annoying thing about CDs was having to buy a bunch of shitty songs along with the one or two good ones that you heard on the radio. (Vitalogy, anyone?)
But now, with iTunes, I'm afraid the pendulum will swing too far in the opposite direction. Who is going to download individual songs you've never heard of, based on the few seconds of preview that iTunes gives you? And how can you really appreciate that odd song within the artistic context of an album for which it was intended — imagine if Dark Side of the Moon were to come out today! No one would buy the instrumentals, even though they are essential to the whole album.
Well, it's a new era, and the music industry will have to figure something out. They've not been terribly good at understanding the market. But what really worries me is the fate of independent music, jazz and classical. Tower Records was their biggest ally, and I hope the music doesn't disappear from the face of the earth along with that great store.
1
We love the familiar, because we fear the unknown. Don't be a Ludite. Never fear economic dislocation. You're making the argument against the horseless carriage, and for the buggywhip manufacturers.
The artists have always made their money from live performance, not record sales. Information technology has done for music what it has done in every other part of society... devolved information/power to the individual. The end product will mean more choices of different better kinds.
Posted by: Casca at November 26, 2006 12:59 PM (2gORp)
2
One of first things I did when moving to a new city was find where the Tower Records was located. When that was done I could breathe easy and focus on other less important things.
I was always looking for old blues.
(By the way, Casca 'Luddite' is spelled with two d's)
Posted by: Brad at November 26, 2006 02:44 PM (9ADYb)
3
ITunes contributed to the end of Tower Records, but what really killed Tower was Amazon.
Posted by: Jake at November 26, 2006 03:47 PM (V6rxT)
Posted by: The Buggles at November 27, 2006 10:32 AM (J7BEJ)
5
Itunes signals the death of the album, not just the CD. While some records might have only a good song or two, I have tried to buy full records because there are many gems that the pigs in the exec offices don't think are good that are great. With the advancement of Itunes and individual songs shopping, people are just buying what record execs get played on radio and not exploring the breath of music out there. This is the most disconcerning thing to me.
Posted by: Talmadge East at November 27, 2006 11:38 AM (yeLux)
6
While I agree it is sad that Tower Records, a physcial location where you actually met people, and could flip through bins of vinyl...and perhaps, as in the case of the L.A. location, see a celeb, I am not as profoundly sad about it. You see, the Interent has opened so many new avenues for vinyl record collectors that were not available, say 10-12 years ago. There is a whole new world to explore, and for me it is quite exciting. iTunes? Never downloaded a song in my life....never will. And, yes I show my age here a bit, but I'll be darned if I have to hear my music through a bunch a bits and bytes, I'll play my vinyl and use my turntable until the day I die. And you know what? I am still playing records that were recorded in the 1930's. Now, I want you to try and play a CD in the year 2050 that you purchased in 1990! If you are looking for vinyl resources and places to explore, visit my site www.collectingvinylrecords.com.
thanks for listening
Robert
Posted by: Robert Benson at November 27, 2006 01:48 PM (KCL6+)
7
It's so ironic that you are promoting the old technology of vinyl records with the new technology of e-books and websites!
Posted by: annika at November 27, 2006 04:52 PM (zAOEU)
8
I'm horribly nostalgic about this kind of thing too, and with both siblings in the business of distributing recorded music we talk alot on this subject. (Sis used to drive the incomperable Miss Spears to Mall and radio gigs when she still worked at Jive)
I'm proud that my Brother works for EMI and Blue Note which is great for the old and new jazz players. The industry has definately taken a hit in the last several years but he says it's suprising how much sales can come from the old standards- and the Beatles ofcourse.
Casca's really right though, the labels haven't gotten with the new technology until they were forced to. Don't worry about jazz dissapearing Annika- wouldn't be prudent.
Posted by: Mike C. at November 27, 2006 07:31 PM (YadGF)
9
Don't worry about the new jazz and classical and all of that. Another bit of technology comes to the rescue. I have XM radio, I love Reggae, so I listen for the hours when they have the new artists on and I jot down the ones I like, I can either download the music, or if they have enough good songs, I will order the cd.
Also, don't be surprised if music stores make a comeback in a different way. I can see a real need for a place to meet with other people and talk about music and then make purchases. I would not be surprised if it happened in a sort of coffeshop atmosphere with live bands and such, and people meeting, then either buying or downloading songs.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 27, 2006 08:16 PM (LcDAy)
10
I think the first corner Tower Records turned was in the early Eighties when the Campbell, CA store closed the posters and paraphenelia (read: head shop) side and started renting videos.
You could still be mistreated by angry goth-kids but it became much harder.
Great memories...
I built my record collection with their $4.44 sales. The albums like Who's Next had been out for a few years but they were brand new to this 16 year old.
BTW, that is one of my favorite trivia questions. Where was the first Tower Records. London, New York and L.A. are the most common responses.
Posted by: Gordon at November 28, 2006 11:57 AM (qI9T8)
11
This blog post has been nominated for inclusion in The Blog Watch article published Sundays in The Sacramento Bee's Forum section. As part of a demonstration program, readers are invited to help rate the candidate blog posts. The highest-rated posts will get top consideration for the limited space available Sunday. To participate, visit ipsosacto.com/bw Voting ends Thursday afternoon.
Posted by: John Hughes at November 29, 2006 04:37 PM (NK3HI)
Posted by: annika at November 29, 2006 08:04 PM (oantJ)
13
The closing of Tower is frequently credited to the growth of downloading and/or online stores, most notably Amazon. Often unmentioned is the issue of pricing. I don't so much download for convenience as I do for cost effectiveness. If I can download an entire album for $9.99, I'm not going to purchase it for $18.99. (Unless it's some really knockout packaging.) And Tower's pricing seemed to me to get way out of control by the mid to late 90s, several years before downloading became prevelant beyond kids on the cutting edge of technology. Much as I once loved Tower, I began looking for alternatives, whether in the big box store or an indie outlet that sold new CDs at more reasonable prices. When Tower's DISCOUNTS started to be priced at $15 or $16, I knew they were in trouble.
Posted by: Jim Chadwick at November 30, 2006 11:18 PM (aWqMi)
14
By the way, in response to Casca's lofty lecture, I want to add that it is possible to have a certain sadness for the passing of the old without being a technology fearing Luddite. Something valuable is always lost, even if the next thing brings certain advantages. You have to be a heartless, soulless robot to simply accept every new development as more wonderful than the last. There are certainly things I like about the new way of aquiring music much better than how I used to do it. But I miss the surprise discovery and the social interaction with fellow music geeks that comes from shopping at brick and mortar locations. And I don't always know if the giving all power of choice to the individual consumer is always a good thing. We are talking about art to a certain extent, not sausages. The visionary artist might be ahead of the consumer who just wants the hits. With a musician I respect, I prefer the idea of he or she taking me on a journey through their latest musical landscape. If I just go for the songs that make the best first impressions, then I risk missing the tune that may prove to be my ultimate favorite several years down the line.
Posted by: Jim Chadwick at November 30, 2006 11:28 PM (aWqMi)
15
Jim, you need to read more carefully. The new paradigm in the music biz creates MORE opportunity for art and artists, than the old corporate driven hype/hit machine. Think of all the music, that you've listened to on MP3, that you'd have never carried home from the record shop.
Posted by: Casca at December 01, 2006 01:51 PM (Y7t14)
16
Casca, as usual, you've got it backwards.
The recording aritsts make the tours to sell records; seldom do touring artists even break even.
Stick to killing bad guys; you are good at that. Leave show biz to them what knows what itz all about.
I've got a son-in-law who is about to be CEO of Justin Timberlake's new label. He's been explaining the tour biz and the sale of discs to me for years.
Check it out.
Posted by: shelly at December 01, 2006 06:16 PM (YadGF)
17
So much to say.
First, I tried to vote but the voting website wouldn't load.
Second, my first experience with Tower Records was in Portland, Oregon. In addition to music, I'd buy my Zippy comic books there. Ah, a simpler time.
I've been to the Tower Records in Brea a few times over the last few years, but there is no Tower Records that I know of in the Inland Empire, so I'd end up at the Virgin Megastore at Ontario Mills more often than not.
Perhaps it's because of my age, but I would still prefer to buy a CD rather than download a song. The only song that I've purchased myself is Donna Summer's "I Feel Love." My daughter, however, has the opposite view.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at December 01, 2006 11:55 PM (/TGZb)
18
Shelly, I love you man, and I don't doubt that Justin makes more from the label than touring. I wouldn't go to see him for free. However, in the old paradigm, most artists got pennies in their recording deals. The lawyers always seem to make a buck though, not that there's anything wrong with that.
Posted by: Casca at December 03, 2006 12:39 PM (2gORp)
19I
was looking some informative website as I looked your website I found so great
informative. I appreciate about your life because you are told a learnable
story. I bookmarked your site and want to get more information about different
topics but at this time I am busy in exam 642-446
Implementing Cisco Unified Communications IP Telephony Part 1. Thanks for information.
20
Its great stuff. We love the familiar, because we fear the unknown. Don't be a Ludite.I would like to say friendship day is coming and if you want to say something to your friends or lover so then find best friend quotes , famous poems , short poems and enjoy this day...
Posted by: petter at July 15, 2010 06:36 AM (6FsKz)
21
Now that Tower is gone, I think it's the symbolic end of the CD. The
most annoying thing about CDs was having to buy a bunch of shitty songs
along with the one or two good ones that you heard on the radio. cheap wicked tickets jersey boys tickets
Posted by: thelasttickets at August 18, 2010 07:19 AM (O0LKH)
Posted by: Green at October 14, 2010 04:24 PM (rFS6L)
23
Now that Tower is gone, I anticipate it's the allegorical end of the CD. The a lot of annoying affair about CDs was accepting to buy a agglomeration of shitty songs forth with the one or two acceptable ones that you heard on the radio
Wednesday is Poetry Day: e.e. cummings
Just over fifty years ago (like, fifty years and two-and-a-half weeks ago) the United States in general, and the United Nations in particular, did nothing while a country in Eastern Europe tried to throw off the yoke of Soviet oppression.
I don't remember much more than that--it's been quite awhile since I've taken a history class. If the teacher told us what the mood of the U.S. was after the failed Hungarian Revolution, I don't remember.
But, based on the following poem by e.e. cummings, I suspect a portion of the country felt the U.S. could have done more.
THANKSGIVING (1956)
a monstering horror swallows
this unworld me by you
as the god of our fathers' father bows
to a which that walks like a who
but the voice-with-a-smile of democracy
announces night & day
"all poor little peoples that want to be free
just trust in the u s a"
suddenly uprose hungary
and she gave a terrible cry
"no slave's unlife shall murder me
for i will freely die"
she cried so high thermopylae
heard her and marathon
and all prehuman history
and finally The UN
"be quiet little hungary
and do as you are bid
a good kind bear is angary
we fear for the quo pro quid"
uncle sam shrugs his pretty
pink shoulders you know how
and he twitches a liberal titty
and lisps "i'm busy right now"
so rah-rah-rah democracy
let's all be as thankful as hell
and bury the statue of liberty
(because it begins to smell)
(The Wikipedia entry discussing the 1956 Hungarian Revolution is here.)
1
This is especially interesting because just the other day my father, talking about an upcoming trip to Hungary, mentioned two students that showed up in his college class around this time. ('56 or '57) They had managed to get out and were convinced, because of their resistance, that they would have been jailed and possibly much worse had they stayed.
Posted by: Mike C. at November 22, 2006 04:38 AM (Eodj2)
2
Hmm, almost exactly what happened in Iraq in the 90's before guys like Jim Baker said to abandon the shias and head home...And now they want to listen to Baker again, which will result in selling out the forces of democracy in Iraq again...all JUST so that the perceptions among the diplomatic set will favor the bush's, because quite frankly the Bush family lives in their world. i think that bush is running this war like an elitist, he's trying to curry the favors of elitist cronies in the diplomatic set because they are family friends and business associates...and instead of these manicured assholes, we just plainly need to kick some ass on the ground and kill the traitors in the security forces/gov't. and kill fucking moqtada al-sadr. damn't that's an ugly man.
I've no idea why the greatest fighting force in the world is under this perception that it can't win against a bunch of 3rd world suicide bombers, that its trapped even though our losses are nothing like previous wars. its probably the head cold i have...but why the fuck didn't we take it to them with all we had earlier, when it was presumably easier to do? We could've stemmed some of this Shia-sunni rage by taking out some of the bad elements when the war initially started.
Why do the Bush's and their advisors keep doing half-ass jobs in Iraq? Its seems as if, at the outset of this engagement, they ruled out using all the options at our disposal. Bush I fucked it up originally by abandoning the shias and kurds, and now it seems junior, refusing to go at it hard militarily, is fucking it up in much the same manner. So much is invested in useless diplomatic perceptions with the Bush war strategy...if we just fuckin' unleashed our arsenal and ruthlessly...damn't i don't know. fucking hindsight. i'll blame it on the head cold.
Posted by: Scof at November 22, 2006 11:21 AM (a3fqn)
Size Matters... Even UnderwaterAnother study, which confirms the obvious. Females prefer males with bigger gonopodia.
Data in hand, Langerhans exposed about 50 females, one at a time, to video images of a male of average proportions at one end of an aquarium and an outsized male at the other end.
"They chose the larger one over and over," Langerhans said. "All females had the same preference."
Don't feel bad though guys, the study also suggests that you might be able to solve your little problem by simply moving to a "predator free environment."
"We found that in predator-free environments gonopodia size was larger, as there is minimal cost for large genitalia in that environment," Langerhans said. For the record, the sex organs of the predator-free guppies were 15 percent longer, on average.
Oh yah, I forgot to mention it. The study was done on fish.
1
Proving that even in the animal kingdom, females are cruel creatures that mock their males. Next up...studies show that female fish prefer males with gold cards
Posted by: Douglas at November 21, 2006 09:23 PM (jlckS)
2
It would be better to study that on experimental rats.
Posted by: Selina at November 28, 2006 06:16 AM (W6pOy)
Car Question
So I'm thinking about getting a new sled. Assuming I graduate and pass the bar, etc. Annikamobile 4.0's transmission is making funky noises, so I think it's time.
I like that new Acura TL. It's modest yet stylish, and the radio is pimp! But I don't like the idea of paying for 91 octane all the time, which is recommended according to the brochure. Does anyone know if that's for real? Would I really fuck it up if I used regular unleaded instead?
My brother says it has to do with the high compression ratio, but don't the Accords also have a high compression ratio? Accords take regular unleaded, but they don't have the 5.1 surround sound radio.
My brother says if I'm willing to spend $30,000 on a new car, I should just put 91 octane in it. But that seems like such a waste, like paying for valet parking when you can just self park.
1
Listen to your brother. A lower-octane gas will ignite spontaneously in a high-compression ratio engine. This leads to knocking and knocking leads to engine damage. Guess what engine damage leads to.
C'mon, guess!
Posted by: Victor at November 20, 2006 07:30 PM (l+W8Z)
2
Don't take auto advice from the booboisie. You're sailing into the seas of octane calculation. In the US, we measure octane differently than the Europeans. Their 91 Octane is the same as our 87 octane. Few people know this, but it's true. I never knew before I bought the BMW.
The best thing you can do is change the transmission filter and fluids. This should be done every 30k miles. Your noises just might disappear for under a hundred bucks.
Posted by: Casca at November 21, 2006 12:53 AM (2gORp)
3
Yeah try new fluid, then get your transmission checked out by an expert. Even if you plan to sell the car. Otherwise you might get stranded somewhere, or else, you can't sell it for crap because everyone notices the noise.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 21, 2006 04:05 AM (VP8Yc)
4
Annie:
Wait to get a new car after you get a job! First of all, you don't even know what city you'll be living in; doesn't that make a difference?
Also, I think you are going to make a pile of money, so, what about a Beemer? Or, a sensible MBZ? Or, best shot, a Prius, with stickers so you can go in the fast lane by yourself. And, it gets @ 50 to the gallon, I think. Check it out.
Where is your Christmas Wish List?
Posted by: shelly at November 21, 2006 05:21 AM (0Co69)
5
As always, Shelly the Greybeard has the best advice.
Posted by: Victor at November 21, 2006 06:12 AM (WHtgF)
6
I know that it seems that way Victor, but not really. Those are all self-evident things that the chica already knows, thus best left unsaid, except that thing about the Prius, and that's just damned wrong. A Prius, over the life of the car will cost about ten grand more than something comparable. That's why they subsidize the pos technology. Plus you get to ride in a plastic death trap.
Don't you guys know anything about sales? She knows what she wants. She's looking for an excuse camouflaged as a reason to buy it. And Kyle, when you change the trans fluid, you'd better get the whole filter kit and use it, OR YOU'RE NOT DOING ANY DAMNED GOOD.
Posted by: Casca at November 21, 2006 07:30 AM (Y7t14)
7
aNNIKA,
FWIW I never use hight test in my Acura. I have had three Legends over the last 15 years and think they are fine automobiles. They recquest HT but run fine with no knocking on reg. As Shelly says, you might consider waiting till the job sisuation pans out and so forth. I also never buy cars new. Get em on the way back out from 3 year leases. Dealers are anxious to get rid of them and they gave below market on the trade in. I have been looking at Audi A6 Quattro's with about 40k miles for 19K-20K. A lot of car with plenty of life for less than a Civic and financing available from the dealer.
Cost per mile is incredably low when you buy this way. The 20-30% loss from new to used on day one has been absorbed by the first owner. Trade in in three more years will be for nearly 50% of what you paid with 40-50 additional miles. Do the math and you will see this is a great way to ownn a nicer car than you would have been able to afford new.
Posted by: Strawman at November 21, 2006 07:37 AM (9ySL4)
8
Getting back to the octane question, does the brocure "recommend" using 91 octane, or does it say using 87 octane will void the warrenty? There are very few cars manufactured today that have commpression ratio high enough to require 91. What does it say about putting E85 in? Cars that aren't dual fuel capable will have warnings that using E85 void the engine warrenty.
Posted by: wayne at November 21, 2006 07:43 AM (qmJpf)
9
OK, here's a link that explains how octane is in the eye of the math dude: http://www.stretcher.com/stories/01/010226m.cfm
Posted by: Casca at November 21, 2006 08:48 AM (Y7t14)
10
Don't listen to Straw. The only vehicle he's even ridden was a (very) Short Bus.
Posted by: Radical Redneck at November 21, 2006 08:55 AM (r7Pgb)
Posted by: Strawman at November 21, 2006 09:12 AM (9ySL4)
12
Yeah, Anni, see if the wording is "recommended" or "required". My supercharged car "requires" the high octane stuff, but most non turbo or supercharged cars merely "recommend" it. For what reason, I just don't know.
The repair boys in the dealer's garage will know. You may wanna ask one of them just how important 91+ octane is in the car you're looking at. If they say you're fine on regular, go for it. But if they say 'Don't even think about anything less than premium', listen closely.
Posted by: ElMondoHummus at November 21, 2006 09:49 AM (xHyDY)
13
Wayne: E85 hardly matters, as no sane person would put that in a vehicle anyway - not that most of us even have the option, what with E85 being nonexistent outside of the Corn Belt.
Pay more per gallon for worse economy, while paying for it again via the Farm Bill subsidies to corn growers? Sign me right up!
It's a nice tax dodge for GM, though.
Posted by: Sigivald at November 21, 2006 04:41 PM (4JnZM)
14
Asia: No, we aren't all doing that to our cars.
In fact, the vast majority of people aren't.
And putting higher octane fuel into an engine won't typically increase power, because it really is ab0ut compression and preventing detonation.
(Comments posted separately in an attempt to figure out why the !@#!@#! comment software thinks this is spam. What? It appears to be the use of "ab0ut" only without the 0. Why is that spam? That's CRAZY. Anyway, for reference, the wikipedia article on octane talks about that. After tearing this apart to try and fix the stupid spam flag, I've lost the energy to put a link back.)
Posted by: Sigivald at November 21, 2006 04:42 PM (4JnZM)
15
Do you remember Bush speeches where he talked about America's addiction to oil? What choices could you make that reduce our oil addiction?
Posted by: will at November 21, 2006 10:13 PM (h7Ciu)
In Danish News
You may have seen this already if it's been on Drudge. If not, please note that it is not safe for work because it contains video of hott topless danish blondes.
This is a new advertising campaign to get Danish drivers to slow down while racing around Copenhagen in their rubber band powered euromobiles.
I love the dude in the turban who says "Denmark has redeemed itself!" Pretty funny. Although I'm not sure what gripe a Sikh might have had with the Danes.
When I was in Copenhagen, I didn't notice a big problem with speeders, at least not in the city center. Actually there's not really a lot of traffic, due to some pretty restrictive laws. Plus, if you get a ticket for speeding, I heard the policeman can collect the money right there.
Scarlett Johansson, Scintillating Intellect...
...on a par with Cameron Diaz,
Johansson says, "We are supposed to be liberated in America but if our President had his way, we wouldn't be educated about sex at all. "Every woman would have six children and we wouldn't be able to have abortions."
I must have missed the President's introduction of the "No Child Gets To Learn About Sex Act." Anybody got a link on that?
The source article also says that Miss Johansson gets tested for HIV twice a year. Honey, if what I heard about you is true, I'd bump that up to about twice a week.
1
Well, she's nice looking; has a great body; and is a good actress. Apparently, she is also an idiot.
Posted by: blu at November 20, 2006 03:24 PM (w2RJn)
2
Great actress yes, and a potential staffer for John Kerry who also says alot of stupid things.
Posted by: Mike C. at November 20, 2006 05:16 PM (0Co69)
3
Well, maybe this is just me, but I'd much rather know that the person I'm sleeping with gets tested twice a year for HIV, then not know if he/she ever gets tested. But then, I'd rather not take a chance of contracting an incurable fatal virus. I know, I'm a stick in the mud like that...
Posted by: The Law Fairy at November 20, 2006 07:00 PM (XUsiG)
4
LF, ya gotta get laid once in a while for it to matter.
LMFAO, I never tire of twisting your nipples.
Posted by: Casca at November 21, 2006 12:56 AM (2gORp)
5
Casca, I admire your flirting technique. I usually say "biting," and da wimmins, dey just runs.
Other verbs that never seem to work:
"swabbing"
"pondering"
"conversing with"
"sniffing"
"slapping"
"leering at"
"drooling on"
"shooting Force-lightning at"
"worshipping"
Well, OK, that last one sometimes earns me a friendly double-take.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at November 21, 2006 07:22 AM (1PcL3)
6
I'd still hit it! Again and again and again and again.
When she starts gettting annoying I'll just say "don't talk with your mouth full. Bitch" ;-)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at November 21, 2006 08:44 AM (r7Pgb)
7
Casca, Kevin raises an excellent point -- jokes about physically harming women never seem to stop being funny, do they? I bet that one goes over real well at the Neanderthal Club.
(it's so funny how the mere sight of my name seems to send you into a conniption fit. Come on, my existence can't be *that* threatening to your fragile little sense of masculinity)
Posted by: The Law Fairy at November 21, 2006 12:23 PM (XUsiG)
8
LMAO, Harm? I've rarely met a woman who didn't LOVE having her nipples twisted. Pull the blinds, lock the doors, and give it a little try. Astroglide might heighten the experience.
Now that rhetoric about the Neanderthal Club... that's a damned nice attempt at Borking. Now follow me closely, and I'll use small words. Borking & bonking are two different things. Here we are talking about bonking.
There is nothing funnier than the professional virgin opining on sex. Do you have an opinion on breathing through your ears?
Posted by: Casca at November 21, 2006 05:09 PM (2gORp)
9
BTW, it's the He-Man Women Haters Club, and you've got a good shot at being our next recruiting postergirl. You'll have to put out though, or none of the members will talk to you, but that could solve your other problem too.
Now you've gone and reminded me of a joke one of the members told last night:
"Why do women have pussys?"
"So men will talk to them."
LMAO, it's ALWAYS funny.
Ciao Bella
Posted by: Casca at November 21, 2006 05:26 PM (2gORp)
10
Alas, Law Fairy has twinkled away into the stardust. Honey, if you want to run with the big dogs, ya gotta be able to piss in the tall grass. Nobody will ever tell you this, but when you play the "I'm a girl card", you lose major cred and style points with men. Oh, we'll all remain silent, and you'll win your momentary point, but you'll never be privy to the inner sanctum of their thinking, and that'll limit you in life.
Posted by: Casca at November 23, 2006 09:57 AM (2gORp)
11
Have you read the bona fides of the fellow the Bushboy has appointed to be in charge of reproductive health ( I don't recall the actual name of the agency but I think it is a sub to PHS? A madman. A psychotic who has presented papers that assert that women who have multiple partners lose the ability to emotionally bond. He is against all forms of birth control for single and married women and promulgates the debunked theories about abortion and breast cancer, abortion and birth defects etc. No abortion under any circumstances.
So, I don't think Ms. JohanssonÂ’s comments are such a stretch. While they might not be literally true it is no surprised that this administration has been the absolute worst on issues of reproductive health, sex education and so forth. They pander the RR at every opportunity.
Posted by: Strawman at November 26, 2006 12:02 PM (9ySL4)
12
Straw,
Can you please let us know how you define a "madman" and a "psychotic"? Now, Castro, for example, is clearly both these things, yet I've never heard you use those terms to describe him or your other left-wing heroes/butchers . This doctor just happens to disagree with you. I'm not certain that is sufficient to earn the labels you've assigned to him.
With that said, he was a terrible choice. His paper trail alone should have made him ineligible for the position, and his comments about "bonding" were ridiculous and anti-intellectiual. The guy is an embarrassment to those of us who consider ourselves Christian, conservative, and intellectual because he is a walking caricature.
Posted by: blu at November 27, 2006 11:34 AM (Wn4WF)
Pumpkin Ice Cream
Here's a great idea for Thanksgiving desert.
1 cup half and half
2 cups heavy whipping cream
3 teaspoons vanilla extract
¾ cup sugar
¼ cup light brown sugar
1/3 can of canned pumpkin, (about 5 ounces)
½ tsp. nutmeg
½ tsp. ground cinnamon
a pinch of ground cloves
a pinch of ground ginger
Mix everything together in a bowl with a whisk, or I use an electric thing that Emeril calls the "boat motor." Chill overnight in the refrigerator. The next morning churn it in the ice cream maker of your choice. When that's done let it freeze for the rest of the day.
It's very pumpkiny. I'm still not satisfied with the texture of this ice cream, though. I've been experimenting with different proportions of heavy cream to milk, and this time I tried the heavy cream/half and half mixture. I think I may go back to the milk next time.
1
You'll do anything to keep from talking about football, won't you.
Scof still owes me money, and Kyle is still from the land of steers and queers.
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 12:44 AM (2gORp)
2
Go ahead Casca, crow all you want to, This is your year! Next year, when all those guys graduate or turn pro it will be another story. Have fun now, while it lasts. I don't really mind because I always kinda liked Ohio State.
The Longhorns blew one they should have had, and that does upset me. Our cute little boy Quarterback got knocked out. But, we will still get a good bowl game, we just have to trounce the Aggies first.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 20, 2006 03:47 AM (Q+SJk)
3
What, exactly, is wrong with the texture? Most problems with ice cream are due to not having a good salt/ice ration in the mixer, followed by freezing it at the wrong time, and, finally, mixing the un-frozen ingredients incorrectly.
Posted by: Victor at November 20, 2006 09:15 AM (WHtgF)
4
LOL, bad news Kyle. Last year was the big graduation year. This is the rebuilding year. I don't know if you noticed, but six different Buckeyes scored touchdowns on Saturday. None are seniors. Smith is a senior. Most of the rest of the team is underclassmen. There are rumors of Gonzolaz & Ginn going to the pros, but we'll see. B2B National Championships could be nice.
Heh don't fret. Mac Brown and LLLLLoyd Carr are both good coaches, just not great coaches.
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 09:17 AM (Y7t14)
5
Jim Tressel is a pedophile...email your paypal info annika's bitch
Posted by: Scof at November 20, 2006 11:28 AM (a3fqn)
6
LMAO, don't worry, your rectal bleeding should stop in a week or so. LLLLLoyd's will take much longer. I see you're from the hater Hart's school of graceful losing.
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 03:51 PM (2gORp)
7
Try about two pinches of kosher salt in the mixture itself. It tends to help break the milk/cream down. I like using eggs to give the confection a more custard-like texture. G'Luck.
Posted by: Uncle Pinky at November 20, 2006 04:05 PM (nlU4c)
8
Hey I was returning the "bitch" you threw at me in the glendale post, plus you always refer to yourself as annika's bitch! Anyhow, I'm confident after going into Eugene and winning that my Wildcats could give 'dem buckeyes a run for their money! Too bad can't bet on that hah!
Posted by: Scof at November 20, 2006 06:13 PM (LvTNO)
9
Yes, and you're still on crack. Feel free to seek sporting action from me whenever the spirit strikes you. I'm always looking for profit streams.
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 07:00 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at November 21, 2006 08:47 AM (r7Pgb)
11
Looks like it would go great with my recipe for pumpkin cheesecake. Must experiment. Be back after the coronary.
Posted by: physics geek at November 21, 2006 10:17 AM (KqeHJ)
12
How about substituting sweetened condensed milk for the cream? There's this fabulous thing called Dulce La Leche, you can find it in your ethnic food aisle. I'm making a pumpkin panna cotta this year, and I'm using half sweet condensed milk and half dulce la leche. It gives a great, full bodied caramelly undertone to the pumpkin.
Good luck!
Posted by: NuggetMaven at November 22, 2006 08:13 AM (DP5IG)
Fracas At Powell
This is what happens when our Universities' social science departments are filled with former radicals.
According to an extremely biased article in the Daily Bruin,
Mostafa Tabatabainejad, a UCLA student, was repeatedly stunned with a Taser and then taken into custody when he did not exit the CLICC Lab in Powell Library in a timely manner. Community Service Officers had asked Tabatabainejad to leave after he failed to produce his BruinCard during a random check at around 11:30 p.m. Tuesday.
I think the UC police didn't handle the situation the best way possible either. They should have carried the guy outside as soon as he was handcuffed and then waited for backup. Using a taser to get him to comply with their orders was not going to work, since it was clear the guy was bent on creating a scene.
But the responsibility for this whole ugly incident lies solely with Mr. Mostafa Tabatabainejad. If you don't have your ID card, go back to your room and get it. If they call the police on you, apologize politely and leave the library. Otherwise, they might just taser your idiot ass.
Plus, when students are indoctrinated by professors who are former radicals constantly reliving the glory days of the 60's in class (I went to Berkeley, remember) it's pretty hard not to view all police interactions as if we lived in Franco's Spain. But we don't.
Update: h/t to TBinSTL for this appropriate PSA, by Chris Rock.
1
This story immediately made me think of this bit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gCCjFbFXn8
Posted by: TBinSTL at November 19, 2006 11:58 PM (MSiPb)
2
A perfect example of hesitating to use appropriate force leading to the use of excessive force. If they had not tried to bandy words with the fuck, and simply tackled, cuffed, and drug him away when he wouldn't comply. There would have been no tazing.
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 12:59 AM (2gORp)
3
Screw the taser, they should have beat the fark out of him like Rodney King.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 20, 2006 03:49 AM (Q+SJk)
4
Apparently the UCPD have greater latitude in using the taser against passive resisters than the LAPD or Sheriff's Office do. And they used it in "drive-stun" mode, which apparently isn't as painful or debilitating as then they shoot the barbs into you and give you the full treatment. I think people are overreacting to the connotations of "taser."
Posted by: Jim Treacher at November 20, 2006 06:43 AM (cYioa)
5
You're right Jim. He shoulda been floppin' like a fish, and trying to breath, not screaming. Still, it's hard to breath/scream with a knee in the back of your neck, and your face in the dirt.
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 09:21 AM (Y7t14)
6
i thought the same thing Casca. i've never been tasered, obviously, but i heard you really can't move for a long time. The fact that he was able to scream like that seems to indicate that he was not immobilized as some later claim.
Posted by: annika at November 20, 2006 09:38 AM (xNQf4)
7
Annika,
Another example of dumb ass police or whatever these sadists are, not applying the basic rules that they were, more than likely, taught. The man posed no threat to anybody or property. His infraction was disobeying a rule about ID, not committing a crime. (I wonder if his name and picture were available on the library computer.) Nevertheless, refusing to leave to get ID, while an infraction of the rules is, without some additional evidence that he didn't belong there, or was acting erratically or was engaged in suspicious behavior, is not justification for violent eviction. If he didn't leave when asked, an officer should have stayed with him while his partner went for civilian authority to intervene or his shift commander. Since the "police" are the agents of the school and presumably have the best interest of the school and its students in mind, the school admin should have made the next decision: Send him to get his card, take him at his word or another simple, civil, appropriate action. If all else fails it is the call of the administrator to have the police remove him or not from the premises. Two officers certainly are capable of cuffing him and walking or dragging him out donÂ’t you think? As I said, no harm to property or another student or facility member had occurred or was imminent. Why use force? Patience and procedure and calm will almost always solve matters like this without violence. With what I saw and heard on the video, the school has exposure in a law suit. To say everything that happened to him, since it stemmed from his bad act, is his fault is too simplistic; nor does it excuse the possibly illegal acts that may have followed.
Annie, I wonÂ’t even address your remarks about this encounter being the result of a liberal hiring bias by the university. I hope you were kidding.
Posted by: Strawman at November 20, 2006 10:28 AM (9ySL4)
8
Typical, Straw: The individual has no responsibility for his actions. His actions and your ridiculously moronic response above are also typical of the Left's total lack of respect for authority or institutions. What if everybody decided, as this jack*ss did, that rules don't matter? What if everybody decided it was OK to incite violence against law enforcement? (For now on, if I don't like a rule or a law, f*ck it, I'm breaking that rule/law. I've got rights, ya know!!!!! Man, I wish I was a minority so I could yell discrimination when the authorities decided that I need to abide by the law.)
Any sane, civilization-loving, fair-minded person who saw or heard about this incident understands that it was totally and absolutely brought on by that moron. To argue any differently is simply more proof of a lack of seriousness and a lack of respect for our culture.
Posted by: blu at November 20, 2006 10:53 AM (w2RJn)
9
Blu,
He absolutly has responsibility and he did instigate the event by not having his required ID card but and I know this is a hard concept for you to grasp, the ends do not justify the means. We are a civilized society, or at least tell the rest of the world we are. The students in Tienemen Sq. were in violation of rules and brought the violence upon themselves, right Blu. Or is it different when a totaltarian govt. engages in violence against its constitutients difffernt than a "free" society doing the same? You wept for the chinese, why not this guy? He did not willfully break a rule, remember that word Blu, because he did not break the law, he then refused( I have not read an account of his first response or the police's first response, have you?) it seems, to comply with an order.
He may be disrespectful of authority and may not like taking responsibility for his behavior, but the police are not in the business of administering moral and ethical lessons, just enforcing the rules which they could have done in any number of ways that would not have resulted in bodily harm, mayhem, and a complete upset to all those who were in the vicinity. If you had been working late on a paper that night which way would you have liked for this event to have gone? A cop standing with the guy, talking to him about the consequences of his actions while more authority arrived and possibly walking him out or the school waiving the ID card rule to preserve order, or with adaquite force firmly escorting him out the door.
Do not make judgements about my philosophy of life or distane for your precious rules, just judge me by what would have ben the outcome if my strategy had been employed. What WORKS is what is important, not the sophists complaint of "what if everybody........ergo the end of civilization"
Only those with no faith in humankind and the strength of the values they hold dear worry about such nonsence.
Posted by: Strawman at November 20, 2006 11:24 AM (9ySL4)
10
Nice try, Straw....but I've seen the video. Have you?
He was given so many opportunities to get up and leave and do what he was told it is nearly impossible to count. He purposely refused, obviously hoping to start an altercation. In a beter world, the students would have supported the police and ignored him. Your cute little scenario where the cops talk to him and tell him about possible consequenes all happened. He refused to comply for several minutes. Fuck him.
And what sort of a morally and ethically challenged person would ever compare the childish antics of a pampered, America-hating leftist moron to the heroes of Tienemen Sq?
Posted by: blu at November 20, 2006 12:06 PM (w2RJn)
11
Blu,
Lawbreakers are law breakers Blu. Nicht Wahr? Not hero's unless you are willing to allow that from time to time one may break laws they don't like asserting their higher moral or ethical authority and of course threaten the government with anarchy and worse. Sort of like the standards we held the German people to after the war.
Herr Muller: Yes, I saw them dragging the Jew down the hall and repeatedly applying electrical shocks to his body.
DA: Had you seen or heard the offense committed by the Jew?
Herr Muller: Yes, he did not haff his papers with him.
DA: Do you know the Jew later died from heart failure, Herr Muller?
Herr Muller: Got sie dank!! That is terrible.
DA: Did you, Herr Muller, when you saw the police dragging and torturing this man consider that you might come to his assistance?
Herr Muller: Nein, never! Herr Prosecutor, I was ordered to stand at a distance and remember, Herr Prosecutor, he did not haff his papers! Our country is based on the rule of law and we cannot tolerate those who would abuse and mock it. Nein, it will mean the end of us if we don't act with strength against these people. They wish to tear our society down, these agents of Stalin.
DA: Herr Muller, if this man had been your son or wife would you have tried to protect them from the Gestapo?
Herr Muller: Oh, ya, certainly I would have tried. Of course, thatÂ’s' another story, I would not let my son endure torture & brutality just for not haffing his papers. This would not be richtig; he is not a Jew, not a communist, Her Prosecutor he luffs Germany.
In a better time in our country, Blu, the students would have overpowered the police and held them accountable for their needless brutality. Just as any passerbyÂ’s might have done the same on behalf of Rodney King
Posted by: Strawman at November 20, 2006 01:43 PM (9ySL4)
12
Did you really just compare that pathetic, spoiled brat to a Jew in the Halocaust? Really?
That's stunning. Beyond contemptible. I'll let somebody else address that sickening, vile post.
Posted by: blu at November 20, 2006 03:33 PM (w2RJn)
13
"Another example of dumb ass police or whatever these sadists are, not applying the basic rules that they were, more than likely, taught."
Wrong.
Posted by: Jim Treacher at November 20, 2006 04:04 PM (cYioa)
14
Jim,
Did we just read the same instructions?
Once in handcuffs, what was the risk of injury to others?
What was the ugency of the matter?
How serious was the offense?
I read the instructions and see no point at which the taser should be used in situation at Powell.
Posted by: Strawman at November 20, 2006 05:50 PM (9ySL4)
15
"I read the instructions and see no point at which the taser should be used in situation at Powell."
Imagine that.
Posted by: Jim Treacher at November 20, 2006 07:05 PM (cYioa)
16
Sigh.
Were the police excessive? I don't know, but I don't think so. The video doesn't show what's going on at the beginning. You can hear them giving directions and orders, and you can hear shouts of "get your hands off me." Sounds like resisting to me.
This starts with dude Rule #1 for dealing with the police: "Don't argue." Even Chris Rock knows that. (Great PSA, BTW.) If a cop says, "Get up!" then you get the fuck up. If you think he gave you an unlawful order, then pursue your civil remedies later of face the (often physical) consequences.
The dude wasn't supposed to be there. He didn't have his ID. Someone in the school administration already made the decision to call the police. The police responded to the call and investigated, as police are supposed to do. The guy couldn't show any ID and the police acted to enforce the rule that says (apparently): "No ID, get out."
It's a minor infraction, absolutely, but the guy refused. You can hear him refusing, you can hear him shouting "get your hands off me." At that precise moment he escalated the crime from simple infraction to California Penal Code 148, resisting arrest and/or interfering with the duties of a police officer, a misdemeanor.
At that moment the police can either: Walk away (from the incident and their duty), continue to negotiate (for compliance with the directive), or make the arrest (either through negotiation or physical force). I really don't know how long they talked to the guy, so I'll grant you that a few more minutes talking might have solved the entire matter.
They moved to remove the guy. He resisted, verbally and physically (passive non-compliance counts). The fight was on.
A taser is used to avoid physical force, i.e., blunt trauma weapons, i.e., fists and batons. All things considered, it's better than the ass whupping that usually comes along. Ask Rodney King. If the taser had worked on him (it didn't), the rest of the beating might never have happened. (And no, I'm not justifying the beating, just making a point: Which do you prefer, a brief shock or broken bones?)
No, I've never been tazed. Yes, I know people who have. They're cops. They are defensive tactics instructors. Cops get tazed before they're allowed to carry and use the taser. None of them screams like this idiot. They do fall to the ground, promptly get back up, and promise never to give the trigger man an excuse to zap them again.
From what that video shows, audio and video, the cops did fine.
Posted by: bob at November 20, 2006 08:12 PM (yq7MM)
Posted by: reagan80 at November 22, 2006 09:53 AM (ULWF4)
18
Visiting on recommendation of the Big Hominid...interesting post and great vids....
as for the argument at hand...First of all, the video is incomplete fuzzy at best and we are all missing vital information about what happened in the beginning so it's difficult to make a fair judgement about the actions of the officers. Having spent some time as a lowly security guard and as a doorman in a busy nightclub I have had experience with tasers and I have been tased. The old style tasers will give you a good shock and knock you to the ground, it all depends on the voltage of the weapon and what part of the body is tased. This guy was obviously juiced up or just got his adrenalin going enough have the taser effect him less than it might effect a more docile victim (who obviously would not need to be tased at all). He was so far out of line he probably deserved a zap or two to get his attention. The police repeatedly told him to get up right after they tased him...STUPID!!! Those things make your legs feel like jello, he likely could not get up as quickly as they wanted him to and then they kept tasing him when he wouldn't comply...duh.
I have to agree with the original post. The guy was obviouly looking for trouble and he found it. The campus cops should have physically carried him outside after they tased him rather than telling him to get up over and over again and tasing him against the protests of other students. If he was handcuffed it wouldn't have been that hard for 4 cops (i saw at least that many) to drag or carry him outside to wait for the local cops to haul him off to jail for any number of offenses from disturbing the peace or inciting a riot (which as one poster noted might have happened in a darker time)failure to comply. Too bad there isn't a law against just plain stupidity cuz they would have to lock this guy up and throw away the key.
Posted by: fencerider at November 23, 2006 07:54 AM (mcr7E)
The Old Bait And Switch
I wonder how many people who voted Democrat knew that reinstating the draft was on the Democrat's agenda.
I consider myself pretty well informed politically, I listened carefully to all the Democratic talking points, I'm on a few Democrat mailing lists. Maybe I wasn't paying enough attention, but I don't seem to remember any Democrat mentioning that bringing back the draft was going to be their first order of business once they got elected.
Maybe I'm wrong here, but it seems to me if the Democrats had mentioned that they wanted to bring back the draft once they got control of Congress, they would not have gotten control of Congress!
1
That pisshead doesn't even have his priorities right. Rangel is more interested in class warfare here than fighting jihadists overseas.
Well, I guess we could look forward to this anyway when the liberals' economic policies ultimately fail....
The specter of unemployment is haunting every politician, economist, industrialist, and labor leader. Mr. Dewey said that he saw the solution in heroic production of gadgets, but as to the immediate means, was silent. Mr. Roosevelt announced that everything was planned and that no one need worry, but his details were nebulous. Mr. Truman thinks that there is magic in the phrase "full employment," but one suspects that his disappointment at Congressional refusal to put his whole program to the test is not unmixed with relief........One of the most obvious palliatives for unemployment is to push a large number of young men into an expanded CCC or an expanded army on a subsistence basis and so make room for others in regular employment - one of the obvious palliatives and one of the worst.-Russell Kirk on the Draft
Posted by: reagan80 at November 20, 2006 12:56 AM (ybfP0)
2
Annika,
I think this is a unilateral piece of policy initiative on the part of Rangle to, as Raygun has pointed out, increase our awarness of the cost of the criminal action in Iraq and to also highlight who's sons and daughters are fighting it. Not the Bush twins nor two to three hundred children and grand children of our legislators.
Posted by: Strawman at November 20, 2006 07:39 AM (9ySL4)
3
Strawman,
I'm sick your ridiculouls need to point out the Bush's daughters are not in the military. It's not relevenat. It's stupid. You see, Einstein, our military is voluntary. Look up the word. Learn it. Understand it. Use it in a sentence. And there are members of the US Congress with sons and daughters in the military. You couldn't even get that right.
Rangle is the worst sort of propagandist. And he is a racist pig. He'd like us all to believe that every soilder is a "person of color" despite the fact that the US military is perhaps the most integrated institution in America.
Posted by: blu at November 20, 2006 10:28 AM (w2RJn)
4
Rangel represents a side of the Democratic Party which is sees the main event as conflict between groups within American society. Such people do not believe in the reality of external threats; nor are they interested in Americans working together to solve real problems. It's always about creating fault lines between groups of Americans and then doing everything possible to deepen and widen these fault lines.
Posted by: david foster at November 20, 2006 10:54 AM (SpkYG)
5
Blu-
Though you are addressing a provocateur, I am in complete agreement at the hypocrisy of the "Bush daughters not in the military" talk.
Bush' daughters are not running for office, and the U.S. is not a Kingdom. It's ludicruos to insinuate that Bush' daughters should join the military as some type of symbolism.
Further, his daughters, as all military persons, are of age to make their own decisions. To imply their parents should control their decisions is to infantilize the Bush daughters, as well as all military persons. It is to paint them as victims, instead of cognizant adults.
Bush himself joined the military, which is more than 99% of such critics did.
The weakness and stupidity of this attack offends me. My 8 year old nephew could do better. Either attack Bush more effectively, or step away from the keyboard.
Posted by: gcotharn at November 20, 2006 02:48 PM (Rhyyb)
6
Well Blu,
You too do seem to be rising to the bait my big mouthed friend. I don't give a fuck if the bush girls don fatigues or not. The hypocracy of all those who scream about this clash of cultures and the need to kill them in Iraq or you'll be killed by them over here is so transparent and utterly rediculas at this point that is bears no further attack. Yes a battle is formulating between fundo-islam and the west and a strategy is necessary but the invasion and effective destablization of Iraq is not a part of the solution; it in fact exacerbates the problem and will continue to do so for at least the next 5-7 years while putting the US in serious financial trouble.
Bush slipped into the line waiting toget into the guard like many young men who did not want to fight in Vietnam. He did not join the armed forces because he believed in the mission. He one step up the ladder from that scum VP who did nothing. I am glad, of course, that they sisn't them participated in the war and that neithWell Blu,
You too do seem to be rising to the bait. I don't give a fuck if the bush girls don fatigues or not. The hypocracy of all those who scream about this clash of cultures and the need to kill them in Iraq or you'll be killed by them over here is so transparent and utterly rediculas at this point that is bears no further attack. Yes a battle is formulating between fundo-islam and the west and a strategy is necessary but the invasion and effective destablization of Iraq is not a part of the solution; it in fact exacerbates the problem and will continue to do so for at least the next 5-7 years while putting the US in serious financial trouble.
Bush slipped into the line waiting toget into the guard like many young men who did not want to fight in Vietnam. He did not join the armed forces because he believed in the mission. He one step up the ladder from that scum VP who did nothing. I am glad, of course, that they sisn't them participated in the war and that neither killed Vietnamese but loath their duplicity.er killed Vietnamese but loath their duplicity.
Posted by: Strawman at November 20, 2006 07:17 PM (9ySL4)
7
The former commander of the Texas Air National Guard says it is a lie to say Bush used influence to "slip into the line" for the Air National Guard fighter pilot program. Several positions were open, yet went unfilled during that time. There was dearth of candidates, partly due to the high standards in place for admitting candidates into that dangerous and demanding program.
Posted by: gcotharn at November 21, 2006 12:13 PM (Rhyyb)
Who Gets To Go To Glendale
I'm very disappointed that the Bears will not be going to the Rose Bowl. A few close calls going the other way, and they might have beaten USC, but it was not to be. Despite Cal's explosive offense, and a defense that kept them in the contest until late, USC clearly has the better all around game.
I also watched the slugfest between Ohio State and Michigan, one of the best games of this college football season. Michigan stayed in range, but they never could get over the top. And afterwards, the announcers debated whether there should be a rematch in Glendale for the National Championship.
Some good arguments can be made for Michigan being the second best team in the country, but I don't want to see a rematch. I saw no fear yesterday on the part of the Buckeyes. I honestly think the team that plays OSU should be a team that makes them a little bit scared. I don't know if USC is that team, but if they beat ND and UCLA, I want to see that matchup.
1
You freakin' PAC10 homer. I'm happy to take another scalp, but Ohio State & TSUN (That School Up North) are the top two teams in the country. Everybody else is an also ran. A rematch would be a historic climax. Beating USC... a mere denouement.
Posted by: Casca at November 19, 2006 10:51 AM (2gORp)
2
Michigan lead, what, once? 7-0? And then they were down 14 most the rest of the way, right? (I'm asking because I didn't get to see much of the game, had a meeting)
I'd be happy with OSU against Florida (assuming they win the SEC) or USC (assuming they win out), I'd even take Notre Dame (again, assuming they win out).
Posted by: KG at November 19, 2006 10:56 AM (dKrWj)
3
BTW, where are those bitches Kyle and Scof? One owes me money, and the other requires public humiliation. C'mon Kyle, speak the truth. Texas couldn't fucking POSSIBLY beat Ohio State in a rematch, lmao.
Posted by: Casca at November 19, 2006 10:59 AM (2gORp)
4
KG, you are correct sir. I'd just like to remind you of one thing though... last year's Fiesta Bowl score, and ND's D which gave the Buckeyes 607 yards, not a very competitive game, and they're basically the same teams, only the OSU offense is more powerful. If USC loses to Charlie the Tuna, Nov 25th will be a VERY dark day.
Posted by: Casca at November 19, 2006 11:05 AM (2gORp)
5
Yes, a disappointing game. Cal has gotten so much better in recent years, but doesn't have the depth that 'SC does. Our run defense looked better than it had all year at times, and it was a sweet safety (when was the last time 'SC gave up a safety at home?) but overall, we were a step behind throughout.
Obviously, losing by 3 to the #1 team in the country isn't as bad as losing to Oregon State (whom Cal pounded in Corvallis). Ya gotta ask the question: to whom did each of the one-loss teams lose? The team that suffered the loss to the highest ranked opponent should face the Buckeyes in Arizona, and to me, that means Michigan.
I think a USC/Arkansaa Rose Bowl would be very entertaining.
Posted by: Hugo at November 19, 2006 11:46 AM (Yu24L)
6
I'm thinking USC/Wisconsin, the other one-loss Big Ten team. USC might be able to beat them.
Posted by: Casca at November 19, 2006 12:41 PM (2gORp)
7
Casca, BCS rules limit each conference to a maximum of two teams each in the BCS bowls. Wisconsin is SOL.
Posted by: Hugo at November 19, 2006 04:52 PM (Yu24L)
8
What you pundits have overlooked is the fact that young teams mature and become progessively stronger as the season moves toward its completion.
USC's Defense is young, but they are big and fast.
Tressel's gonna have to bring the A game if those fuckheads at the BCS get it right this year and ask USC.
Booty just gets better; Jarret and Smith are at the top of their game, and the running game works with three or four different backfield combos.
We are awesome and tough and deep and we will kick OSU's red asses after they fall asleep for 50 days or more.
Casca, we meet in Glendale; keep Arizona green, bring money.
P.S. WE have a center, not a tackle with a broken arm...
Posted by: shelly at November 19, 2006 05:37 PM (SLFj+)
9
Hugo - USC pounded Arkansas 50-14 at the beginning of the season, I'm not sure it would be any better in January.
I'm thinking OSU vs Florida in Glendale and USC vs Michigan in Pasadena would be pretty good match ups.
I just don't like the idea of a rematch in the National Championship game, it reminds me of when Nebraska got in without even winning it's conference. Doesn't seem right.
Posted by: KG at November 19, 2006 09:28 PM (dKrWj)
10
No shit Hugo, my tongue in cheek point is that there is one undefeated, and two one-loss teams in the Big Ten.
First we had to listen to shit from the stupid longhorn fucks whose road team officials cheated us out of the national championship last year, about how Colt McCoy was going to rip us a new asshole. Then it was Iowa who would humble us... lions and tigers and Iowa, oh my! Then Michigan was going to expose us as a team who hadn't really played anyone with talent. Ohio State has beaten the number two team in the country twice this season, and it wasn't the Trojans either time. At this point, enough of the fools who get a vote may jump USC over Michigan, but that won't make them a team that hasn't lost to punkass bitches in Oregon. They don't rate.
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 12:42 AM (2gORp)
11C'mon Kyle, speak the truth. Texas couldn't fucking POSSIBLY beat Ohio State in a rematch, lmao.
Honestly? Yes they could, about a 20% chance, but thats better than most teams have. I would give Florida about a 40% chance, and USC maybe 45%.
Michigan is overrated, they were never really close in that game.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 20, 2006 03:54 AM (Q+SJk)
12
Kyle, when you're in a hole, QUIT DIGGING! Michigan did a LOT better than Texas did. At least they were in the game at the end. UofM beat the little green weenies at ND. Where is UT's quality win? USC's big win against Arkansas could easily get deflated big time this Saturday when the Razorbacks play LSU. If USC doesn't blowout ND, they have no claim on the two-spot at all.
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 09:39 AM (Y7t14)
13
Sorry Casca, got sick over the weekend, been out of it. Email me your paypal info...
Posted by: Scof at November 20, 2006 11:03 AM (a3fqn)
14
After a mid-season lull, SC has started peaking while Cal peaked with the Oregon game. It's a good thing the Bears have Stanfurd to help regain their strut.
SC is really playing good football now. I wouldn't want to be Notre Dame or UCLA in the next couple of weeks.
The only possible claim Michigan would have for a re-match is that they were beaten in Columbus, and maybe with a neutral site the outcome would be different. But how boring would that be? I think SC will the Luckeyes a run for their money in Arizona.
Posted by: DHammett at November 20, 2006 01:33 PM (J7BEJ)
15
All the talk about defense is history, right Nutmeg? OSU's vaunted D looked like a sieve against Michigan.
This is just typical Big Ten Blow hard talk.
As usual, the Pac Ten will cook their butts and serve it to them for lunch .
USC 20 OSU 9.
Posted by: shelly at November 20, 2006 05:30 PM (0Co69)
16
Wow, that's pretty bold, Shelly. I'd put the over under on that game at 45.
Posted by: annika at November 20, 2006 06:57 PM (qQD4Q)
17Gentlemen, gentlemen, please leave that "typical Big Ten Blow hard talk" at the door, and bring your money to the Casca betting window. I'm prepared to take all even money bets against the Buckeyes. That of course is based on your willingness to let your money talk.
Actually, I think Shelly is a little drunk, because he knows better than to try that sort of shit talking, lol. The rubbers have a pretty good chance of losing TWICE in the next two weeks (soto voce: AND HE KNOWS IT).
Posted by: Casca at November 20, 2006 07:14 PM (2gORp)
18
Nah, just wishful thinking by the Big Ten Cool Aid Drinking Society. USC has no chance of losing either of the next two. Touchdown Jesus doesn't travel with the team, and we having lost in our house in five years.
UCLA will be lucky to answer the bell in the fourth quarter. Pasadena isn't home, but we've played there so often it is beginning to feel that way.
Why would anyone want to bet at even when we can get points? Do you pay the money line?
Let's wait for Glendale; can your boys stay out of jail until January 8?
Posted by: Shelly at November 21, 2006 05:29 AM (0Co69)
19
Shit Shelly, the Tuna has the same team he almost beat you with last year. SUC isn't as good as they were last year. This is the season-maker for both teams. If SUC blows out the domers, they just might talk their way ahead of Michigan, because all those $35k a year sportswriting geni who get a vote want to come to LA to write about former Buckeye Pete Carrol's curls before the big game, and fry their pasty, bloated, expense account supported, post holiday, white asses in the California Sun, but Arkansas has to beat LSU too, or the gators jump your ass. One is reminded that there are an infinite number of angles at which one may fall, but only one where one might stand upright.
If you don't mind, we'll do this Tressel style, and play one game at a time. UCLA will hold til next week.
Why bet even when you can get points? There is presently no line for any Buckeye action, so you can't get points yet. PLUS, bilious gasses are escaping your cakehole making noises as if you want to bet against the Buckeyes. I'm willing to accomodate you by putting my money where my mouth is.
Finally, you've clearly lost your mind. Give your son your car keys. You want to compare the moral character of my God-fearing Buckeyes against your incense-burning, mantra-chanting, dope-smoking, wife-murdering Trojans? At least our Heisman winners are fit to attend games, and hold a sideline pass.
Posted by: Casca at November 21, 2006 08:16 AM (Y7t14)
20
LOL.
After they published the Simpson note, my daughter phoned from MIssoula to ride me about him being a graduate of USC; I told her her graduated Summa Cum Laude.
The man is a degenerate. fuctional illiterate. We have tgaking his number down from the museum.
We'll see about Saturday night; my grandson has convinced me we need to drive in from Palm Springs to catch the game. My guy has it at 7 1/2.
We are looking good, but that seems like a lot to me.
FIGHT ON!!
Posted by: shelly at November 22, 2006 08:16 AM (SLFj+)
21
Never bet against the Irish. I'll be watching every minute of this thing. Sadly, I won't be watching LSU/Ark on Friday, because it's not televised, unbelieveable.
Posted by: Casca at November 22, 2006 08:52 AM (Y7t14)
22
Are you sure about LSU/Ark not being TV'd? Usually you can buy that stuff on Satellite and watch the local cast.
Which game will the Nutmegs be watching? Better believe it; they'll be glued to the set at 5:00 P.M. PST when ND takes it's latest and best whipping. This game has been sold out since last year and will be nothing like playing in Touchdown Jesus' church.
USC fans plain do not like Notre Dame; I think they'd rather beat them then UCLA, but, hell, we'll slap both of them around, then come gunning for the Nutmegs in Glendale, who will be on their 50 day vacation. We'll see how that goes.
Posted by: shelly at November 23, 2006 04:50 AM (Eodj2)
23
Still more bilious gasses, yet not a round number? Seems to me you credit your losers as eleven point favorites, and here I am offering you even money.
Turns out LSU/Arkansas is on CBS, but who could know since they don't seem to feel like telling anyone about it, and the queers at ESPN/ABC/Disney won't.
Last Saturday was a piece of history. This Saturday is an item of curiosity, like a wrecked car on the side of the freeway. January 8th will be a piece of history, but not because an 11-1 Trojan team limps into town.
Posted by: Casca at November 23, 2006 10:11 AM (2gORp)
24
Were you offering even money on the Domers to beat USC? That I'll take.
I thought you wanted even money on OSU v. USC. OSU will be a favorite because of the Midwestern Kool-Aid contingent.
The first real test they'll have will be USC...and, after a 50 day layoff, even Woody, himself could not get them going fast enough to survive.
Nah, OSU is going down.
I'll probably bet the money line in that game.
Posted by: shelly at November 23, 2006 08:46 PM (SLFj+)
25
All I hear is clucking; I guess no one wants to back The Touchdown Jesusless Domers.
OK, guys, keep an eye on a guy named Booty. (Not the song girls)
Posted by: shelly at November 24, 2006 07:12 AM (SLFj+)
26
Now you try to play the "addled senior citizen" card. Why would I bet ND? They're an extremely mediocre team with a talented Quinn & Samardjia. They were crushed at home by Michigan. Let's see what the Trojans can do.
If LSU beats Arkansas today, USC will take a major computer hit, as they should. Shit they wouldn't be ahead of Florida if it wasn't for the herd mentality of the humans who vote. Most, particularly the sportswriters, have no capacity for thought.
Posted by: Casca at November 24, 2006 09:23 AM (2gORp)
27
Casca, as usual, you've got it wrong about USC. The sportswriters do not like USC, or for that matter, any Pac 10 teams. That is why we consistantly beat your Midwest and Eastern asses in "upsets". We get as much respect from the mainstream media as George W. Bush does.
The entire time that we were negotiating for a return of NFL football to the Coliseum, I could not get Bill Dwyre, the Sports Editor of the Los Angeles Times, to go to the Coliseum. He was such a ND fan that he wouldn't even go for the USC/ND games, he hated USC so. I doubt he ever voted for us to be number one, or even number two.
Nope, according to the sports hacks, there is no quality football West of the Mississippi.
But we still kick everyone's asses, as you will see in Glendale.
BTW, Vince Young's knee was down; I saw it then, and the new videos prove it. They should send the third trophy to Figueroa Tech.
Posted by: shelly at November 25, 2006 02:40 AM (SLFj+)
28
You're reasoning from the specific to the general. That's a mistake. Plus, you're on crack.
Posted by: Casca at November 25, 2006 12:30 PM (2gORp)
29
Is the Glendale question still under debate?
Notre Dame votes for USC.
Posted by: shelly at November 25, 2006 11:45 PM (Eodj2)
30
Typical lawyer... seeking a dismissal. If you make it to Glendale, it will be on the back of Michigan, which is a slightly better team, but not nearly the popular choice like pizza, romance novels, and USC. When Big Ten teams play, there's no Hollywood crowd on the sidelines, or media clamor for them to be annointed. Michigan has earned their shot at the national championship. The team that lost to Oregon State has not.
I have no dog in this fight, either scalp will do. However, national championship teams don't give up safetys, or have punts blocked.
Posted by: Casca at November 26, 2006 10:07 AM (2gORp)
31
Hey, Cas, you act as if you didn't see the game.
The little Green Weenies were never in it. We kept them close with two fumbles and an interception in the first half, but when Carroll got through discussing the turnovers, they came back with a vengence.
The only credible win Michigan has was against ND and we did it too, although "...the Tuna has the same team he almost beat you with last year."
Yeah, but we have faster, taller corners and a real Tressel type D, something OSU apparently lacks this year, judging from the way a hapless Michigan picked it apart.
Our guys got a wake up in Oregon; we got way behind in the first half. Then we came back strong, almost all the way. We haven't had a bad half since and and have credible wins over Arkansas, ND, Cal and others, and will add UCLA for good measure before we come a'hunting for Nutmegs in Arizona.
BCS computer will have us ahead Monday and we will add to that next week. Them start quivering...
Posted by: shelly at November 26, 2006 05:36 PM (Eodj2)
32
BCS has USC at number 2 now. I guess that answers that question.
Posted by: annika at November 26, 2006 11:13 PM (qQD4Q)
33
And for good reason; ask your buddies in Strawberry Canyon who they'd rather not face.
USC is young, but they are big, fast and well coached. Pete Carroll emphacizes one thought always "FINISH".
Granted, they let down up North against Oregon State and woke up too late to catch them. Granted, they thought all they had to do was show up on the field in uniform and the other team would get out of their way.
But that was then and this is now.
First, a short stop in Pasadena to pay our respects to the hapless Bruins, and to regret our being unable to make it for the Rose Bowl in January, 'cause we be goin' to Glendale to kick some Midwest Butt.
And, Annie, unless my calulations are off, that puts Cal, who is in second place in the Pac Ten, into the Rose Bowl - or. does the BCS screw up that stuff as well? (well, that assumes you can squeek past Stanford)
Posted by: Shelly at November 27, 2006 12:37 AM (Eodj2)
34
Further research tells me that the old deals between the Pac 10 and Big 10 are off and Florida or LSU may face Michigan or whoever in the Rose Bowl.
I think the BCS sucks. Anyone else?
Posted by: shelly at November 27, 2006 01:20 AM (Eodj2)
35
The BCS has merely camouflaged the flaws of letting sportswriters, who are ignorant, and coaches, who are too busy, to chose the best teams. USC with the #3 Strength of Schedule? Stanford #1? Give me a fucking break. Three teams ranked above Wisconsin lose, and Wiscy moves up one place? Give me a fucking break. Moving USC ahead of Michigan on the basis of an ND self-destruct in the Coliseum? Give me a fucking break.
"The only credible win Michigan has was against ND and we did it too" Uh... they survived the Big Ten, a real conference, and beat 11-1 Wisconsin. Give me a fucking break.
Posted by: Casca at November 27, 2006 07:42 AM (Y7t14)
36
Three fucking breaks? Where's the match?
Here's the deal: Big Ten football is a bunch of coal miners' kids who can't stay eligible for four years.
Pac 10 football is the real thing. Go back and watch Jarrett, or, better yet, show up in Glendale with a lot of cash and pay for the privilege.
OSU should be about 7 points favorite. Come to the Shelly table to give away your money.
Look at the Rose Bowl histories, folks. Big Ten Football sucks. And Tressel has no D. And, the Emporer has no clothes.
Posted by: shelly at November 27, 2006 09:33 PM (Eodj2)
37
Talking shit, and asking for points... what kind of punkass move is that? This toothless hillbilly prefers action to talk.
Posted by: Casca at November 27, 2006 09:49 PM (2gORp)
38
Must be fun to know that there will be a real game on January 8 that everyone wants to see. Fun for everyone except the Nutmegs.
Hell, they were hoping for a laugher, maybe getting Michigan again. This time, they'd leave the bowler who played center home and whack them soundly. How many times has Tressel beaten Carr now?
Now, the fun is over; they have to get serious, because they have to play a real team, with real coaching, an explosive offense and a strong defense.
Arizona isn't going to be fun for the boys from Columbus. It's gonna be a long ride home to Ohio. And to San Diego.
Posted by: shelly at November 28, 2006 03:12 AM (0Co69)
39
One would think, that at your advanced age, and level of accomplishment in life, that you'd be able to "act like you've been there before". Oh, but wait, you're not there yet.
Posted by: Casca at November 28, 2006 07:21 AM (Y7t14)
40
Been there, done that.
Except, no, we've never had to sweat it like this and actually made it.
UCLA means nothing; we will have a nice gentle game and win by three TD's.
No, we've never played for a National Championship and been an underdog. Not in the Carroll Era, anyway.
We are coming to Glendale hungry and impatient; Ohio State, by contrast will be vegged out on 50 days of luxuriating in the wilderness.
No matter how you cut it, Ohio State is going down.
Posted by: shelly at November 28, 2006 11:58 PM (0Co69)
41
I have in the past spared your tired old one-trick-pony ass your just deserts; i.e. kicking you while you were down. No more! You couldn't beat Texas with all the weapons last year. You lose to punks at Oregon State (who were in turn THROTTLED by Boise State), and use the USC hype machine that births heismans to bullshit your way into the NC game. At least Boise State would have a real argument for being there.
What do ND, USC, & UofM have in common? Their fans are condescending pricks. I'm looking for a signature Buckeye win from that toothless hillbilly, Jim Tressel.
Posted by: Casca at November 29, 2006 07:49 AM (Y7t14)
The Dutch government agreed on Friday a total ban on the wearing of burqas and other Muslim face veils in public, justifying the move on security grounds.
. . .
"The cabinet finds it undesirable that garments covering the face -- including the burqa -- should be worn in public in view of public order, (and) the security and protection of fellow citizens," the Dutch Justice Ministry said in a statement.
. . .
The Muslim community estimates that only about 50 women in the Netherlands wear the head-to-toe burqa or the niqab, a face veil that conceals everything but the eyes.
What's that? "The moslem community?" I didn't know they spoke with one voice. In fact, I always heard that the reason they never seem to denounce blowing up innocent people and chopping people's heads off is because there is no unified "moslem community." But I digress.
Dutch Muslim groups have complained a burqa ban would make the country's 1 million Muslims feel more victimized and alienated, regardless of whether they approve of burqas or not.
"This will just lead to more girls saying 'hey I'm also going to wear a burqa as a protest'," Naima Azough, a member of parliament from the opposition Green Left, told an election campaign meeting for fellow members of the Moroccan community.
Sorry, but I don't seem to remember any moslem girls protesting when Van Gogh was killed. Perhaps if they had, Dutch people would've been more hesitant to ban their backward-ass burkas.
Job Cohen, the Labour mayor of Amsterdam, said he opposed burqas in schools and public buildings, and said women wearing one who failed to get a job should not expect welfare benefits.
Makes sense to me. Nice to see Dutch Labour getting a clue.
1
There seems to finally be a reaction to the cultural aggression of the muslims in Europe, but its too little, too late. If they don't limit further muslim immigration and the white people don't start having babies, they will all be dominated by Islam in about twenty years.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 18, 2006 05:42 AM (RnziQ)
2
kYLE,
Hello, but aren't Semites white people? And when did the distinction between Muslims and the rest of us come down to skin color?
Annie, I have mixed feeling about legislation that regulates the clothes we wear. And what did the framers have in mind when they wrote the establishment clause? Religion free from the influence of government:Support or repression.
I don't know anything about the foundation of Dutch law but correct me if I am wrong if I hear you saying that you would be in favor of the US passing a similar law.
I would not have a problem with the govt. banning ALL visual symbols of one's faith while in a public school or while employed as a civil servant, right down to little cross earings, or a star of david visible on a mans chest, but I would draw the line at citizens walking the streets.
Posted by: Strawman at November 18, 2006 10:53 AM (9ySL4)
3
Am ignoring my rule to respond to the dirty twat above:
This is our culture, we set the rules to keep this culture in place. Fucking tolerance and establishment clauses and shit weren't designed to have us disestablish our culture (i.e. banning visual symbols of faith for all) because some asshole camel jockey thinks his homely bitch wife is too hot to show her face in public. Everything does not have to be equal. burqas go against western culture, we don't have to give anything in response to banning them. how they practice their religion can adapt or go back home.
There is a reason they immigrated to our countries, and its because of the superior way we do things. Like managing to have a fucking functioning economy so that they, the immigrant, can leech off the welfare from it. The Moslem/Muslim/Saracen morality doesn't work with the things that make the West so attractive to immigrate too in the first place. They must take the steps to adapt if they want part of what we have. And that concept of "we" is fundamental here. You can take brotherhood of mankind, treat everyone the same crap elsewhere. I live in a real world with real borders that set the boundaries for different cultures. This is us, here, our land, and its what is happening with islamic immigrants in europe (i.e. they are seeking to change what we thinking of as "european") that is why we need to oppose high levels of immigration here. If the immigrants love the way they do things so much, then they should stay home.
Posted by: Ignoreland at November 18, 2006 01:56 PM (LvTNO)
4
Ignoreland,
Boy are you a schmuck. What percentage of the AMerican population do you think is the product of immigrants that arrived since 1900?
I don't what you think you've got but whatever it is has been enhanced, modified, enriched and sustained by people born outside America.
Posted by: Strawman at November 18, 2006 02:47 PM (9ySL4)
5
Speaking only as a descendent of colonists to the New World, may I say that I agree with ignoreland. Immigrants came to the US because of the benefits it offered. Immigrants today such as latinos seem to be here because they think it is their right. Look at the illegals protesting in NC over being fired at the Smithfield packing plant. [management should be jailed for hiring them.]
Muslim immigrants come here to spead islam as their prophet tells them to. That is why we need to oppose high levels of *any* immigration here.
Posted by: Southern(USA)whiteboy at November 18, 2006 04:40 PM (2C4Ih)
6
I agree that it's undesirable for a government to legislate what people may wear. I don't know why any woman would want to be hampered by a burka or why it pleases a husband to have his wife draped like that.
Posted by: Joules at November 18, 2006 09:01 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: Casca at November 18, 2006 09:42 PM (2gORp)
8
Arabs, Turks, and north africans are not white people in the same sense that Europeans are. Nor do they think themselves such. However, I never intimated that the differences came down to skin color, it was only used to draw a distinction. But you are too ignorant and bellicose to know any better.
What I said still stands, they Euro's are finally waking up to the vipers in their midst. But it is a day late, and a Euro short.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 18, 2006 10:00 PM (Vu20H)
9
While I applaud the move by the Dutch, I remain most worried that Europe will just let this crap go on until it reaches a crisis point and then the reaction will have all the sense and reason of the "usual" revolution in old Europe. I expect the blood will run as deep as it ever has in the streets of Paris and other "enlightened" cities. Instead of reasonable reforms we will see violent and ridiculous over-reaction and a real battle, ending with bloody retribution. My only hope is that we will at least get to see bare breasted women atop the barricades.
Posted by: TBinSTL at November 18, 2006 10:54 PM (MSiPb)
10
To Strawbrain:
Listen up you dumb fucktard:
Our culteral Political Coorectness will cost us our society. Those assholes can conform or go home.
The mere thought that some womanhas the right to wear a veil for her driver's license photo makes me want to puke. No wonder the crooks and assholes all love it; hell soon some bank robber will sue to be able to wear a mask as he does his banking withdrawals or his no pay shopping at Costco.
Eurabia is just waking up top the real threat of Islam; too late, I think they are goners. All that might survive here is American and Australia.
Get Mark Steyn's new book, "America Alone". The birthrate, plus the determination to proseletyze us all to make US conform to THEIR Sharia is the most frightening thing I have ever read.
Take your PC and shove it, and while you are at it, get the hell off of our blog. No one here agrees with any of your drivel.
Posted by: shelly at November 19, 2006 05:07 AM (SLFj+)
11
Shit Shelly, you're starting to sound like me. The deal with this asshole is that he is self-loathing, thus thrives on the negative attention of others. Were he simply ignored, he'd wander away, but Kyle and Scof foolishly play his game.
BTW Scof, PAY UP BITCH! LMAO!!!
Posted by: Casca at November 19, 2006 09:27 AM (2gORp)
12
Shelly,
I didn't think this was anyone but Annika's blog. You being a private property deist should not disrespect her property by calling it yours. But that is the least of your problems.
I am actually not a PC kinda guy and if you read my stuff with out your idiot prejudices you would know that. Feeling uncomfortable with our government legislating clothing standards and so do you. This is something I would have thought you would oppose being the reactionary RW less govt. is more kinds guy you are but like most of your breed your self-serving interests and ass dribbling fear trumps your clear minded thinking.
As I said, when in the midst of civil authority the veil and burka come off or you don't drive. The needs of the state come first. If you can demonstrate that burka clad bank robberies are more than a figment of your petrified imagination than then they shall also be banned from the public street. But you are clearly not thinking. The history of immigration has ALWAYS been that a majority come here for peace and prosperity and freedom from oppression. Although it does seem that many more are coming these days for the money to send home to the country that they still call home. But the difference is the legal v. illegal immigrants. I agree in principal with efforts to stem the tide. I am not sure of the best way to do it or how to deal with the 10 million or so who are here. I'm listening? Got any good ideas?
This blog would be limping toward moribundness(no disrespect intended Annie, but you know what it would be like around here if Shelly and Catshit had sway)if not for opposing opinions. I am one of a few but you Shelly and your crony are nails in the coffin of discourse, imagination as well as cancerous polyps in the colon of a healthy society.
Kyle8,
You can make all the racial distinctions you wish: Really white v. somewhat white but Christian v. less than white but Muslem v. swarthy white but Jewish, etc. ( Ask the Afrikaners for some help in this area, they have plenty of distinctions) Just donÂ’t expect others to enter your preposterous, racist little construct without the benefit of a map.
Posted by: Strawman at November 19, 2006 11:40 AM (9ySL4)
13
"Were he simply ignored, he'd wander away,"
Not quite, Casca.
Straw doesn't care whether we ignore him or not. As long as he thinks there is some hope that he will influence Annie to "convert" and jump on the Leftist bandwagon, Straw will not go away. Since Annika hasn't shown any overt displays of contempt or hostility towards him, his delusions won't be shattered anytime soon.
Posted by: reagan80 at November 20, 2006 12:15 AM (ybfP0)
14
"Since Annika hasn't shown any overt displays of contempt or hostility towards him, his delusions won't be shattered anytime soon."
challenging Strawman to a duel didn't count?
Posted by: annika at November 20, 2006 12:36 AM (qQD4Q)
15
"challenging Strawman to a duel didn't count?"
Sorry, I must've missed that one, but I'm glad to hear that nevertheless. If that means there's no chance that you'll ever fall for his charades, I guess I can stop digging through the archives and repeatedly showing off Straw's cyber dingleberries.
Posted by: reagan80 at November 20, 2006 02:03 AM (ybfP0)
16
Raygun,
I think you should examine your fondness for my dingleberries cyber or otherwise.(Ya' know Ray its demeaning just to type that word.)
Annie challanged so I had the choice of weapons. When I chose ABM's at 1000 miles she conceded to a draw since the chances of any damage was nil.
Posted by: Strawman at November 20, 2006 07:45 AM (9ySL4)
Posted by: Scof at November 16, 2006 02:27 PM (a3fqn)
2
Were that it was Thomas vice Milton. If William F. Buckley is the godfather of modern american conservatism, Milton Friedman is the godfather of conservative economic thought in the last half of the 20th Century. God bless the old boy, and all the others of the Chicago school.
Posted by: Casca at November 16, 2006 03:34 PM (2gORp)
3
I second that sentiment, Casca. Well said.
Thanks Annie. Milton Friedman will be studied and discussed long after his death - truly a great visionary and lover of freedom.
Posted by: blu at November 16, 2006 05:49 PM (w2RJn)
4
Friedman believed in Freedom. In his eloquent writings I developed my own Ideas of the morality of freedom. Alas, too many people reject it. It is the best way ever shown to increase human happiness, and economic growth.
But in order to embrace freedom, you must give up two things which are so dear to most people. 1) evading personal responsibility, and 2) imposing your (collective) will upon others.
Even many of the conservatives who are right now praising Dr. Friedman do not believe in what he taught.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 17, 2006 04:11 AM (H4gAp)