February 21, 2007
I hope you've heard about the latest Clinton-Bomber skirmish. It's a sure sign of the even worse backbiting to come.
The latest row was sparked by music mogul and former Clinton toady David Geffen, now a Bomber groupie, whose comments were a knife in the back of Mrs. Clinton. He said:
Everybody in politics lies, but they [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it's troubling.Slate.com cited this theory on why David Geffen might have turned against the Clintons:
The gossip passed around by those who follow Hollywood and politics holds that Geffen fell out with Bill Clinton much later over the then-president's refusal to pardon Leonard Peltier and over Clinton's subsequent allusion to Geffen's thwarted lobbying effort to demonstrate that he didn't dole out pardons as favors to certain friends.Anyways, Hillary didn't like what Geffen said and her campaign wants Bomber to disavow the statement and return Geffen's money. Bomber, perhaps deciding it was best to draw a line in the sand early against the Clinton machine, said no.
At a candidate forum in Nevada today, Hillary played the "politics of personal destruction" card, which I think Bill invented:
I sure don't want Democrats or supporters of Democrats to be engaging in the politics of personal destruction.She said, no doubt hiding an ironic smile.
I'm fascinated by Bronco Bomber. If I was a liberal, I'd totally jump on his bandwagon, and not just because I love making fun of his name. He's got a lot of strengths. He's very personable and yes, I hear he's articulate and clean too. I think we all want a candidate who bathes regularly, regardless of our party affiliation.
I'm not yet convinced however, that Bronco Bomber is not this season's Howard Dean. Being a media darling means nothing to the Iowa caucusers. Serious political junkies have to admit that raising a ton of money means nothing if your organization doesn't know how to use it.
People like David Geffen may represent the vocal face of the Democratic party. But they don't represent the majority of voting Democrats, who are more centrist than the press corps realizes. That's why Dean came in third in Iowa last time, even though the media kept treating him like he was the front runner. Rank and file Democrats were rightly suspicious of Dean's electability, and they went for the safer bet, John Kerry. The trouble was, they didn't inspect the goods well enough before switching to Kerry, and they got burned.
Not that I place much stock in the "Hawkeye Cauci," as Rush calls it. I don't. New Hampshire has always been a more reliable indicator of party preference, historically. And Bronco Bomber is no Howard Dean; they don't share the same negatives. That's good for Bronco. Unfortunately his poll numbers are not in a range where he should be getting the kind of press he's getting right now. The latest polls have him losing to Hillary by an average of 18.2 points. That's a lot of ground to make up, even for a media darling.
Posted by: Casca at February 21, 2007 09:33 PM (2gORp)
Posted by: Arik at February 21, 2007 11:20 PM (bACRg)
Posted by: annika at February 21, 2007 11:53 PM (JBltT)
Posted by: Casca at February 22, 2007 07:30 AM (Y7t14)
Posted by: david foster at February 22, 2007 12:58 PM (ZD/CA)
Posted by: Arik at February 22, 2007 04:22 PM (bACRg)
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 22, 2007 05:53 PM (GT9eg)
Posted by: Joules at February 22, 2007 06:30 PM (u4CYb)
Posted by: kyle8 at February 22, 2007 07:22 PM (z86sf)
Posted by: shelly at February 24, 2007 08:49 AM (SLFj+)
Posted by: will at February 26, 2007 06:34 AM (z62e3)
Posted by: Arik at February 27, 2007 05:15 PM (bACRg)
Posted by: will at February 28, 2007 02:49 PM (z62e3)
Posted by: reverse phone lookup free name results at February 02, 2013 07:31 AM (WAKEr)
62 queries taking 0.103 seconds, 175 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.