November 27, 2006
MNF Week XII
Quickly. Green Bay at Seattle. Green Bay sucks hard. Ten point underdogs. I followed a pattern last time, which proved true. However, if I follow it again, the chart would tell me that GB wins, and I lose if I bet for GB. They being 10 point underdogs, the pattern breaks down. It's illogical because it tells me I must bet against GB in order to win, but there's no way I can win by betting against them if they win as underdogs. Understand? Therefore, I will assume that the pattern of WLWLWL for GB's last six MNF appearances will be broken tonight (a logical assumption, since they suck hard, see above), and take Seattle minus the points, and see what happens.
Comments are disabled.
Post is locked.
Update: A push! Ha-ha, a muthafucken PUSH!
Posted by: annika at
06:56 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 135 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Flawless reasoning my dear, but what about the Hawk factor?
Posted by: Casca at November 27, 2006 09:41 PM (2gORp)
2
What is your take on the al-Maliki/Ahmadinejad meeting? On Iranian influence (covert and overt) overall?
Posted by: will at November 28, 2006 06:04 AM (h7Ciu)
3
STFU, collect your nasty smelly socks, and go the fuck away. You that feel compelled to engage this miserable piece of shit should STFU too.
Posted by: Casca at November 28, 2006 07:16 AM (Y7t14)
4
NOT-SAFE-FOR-WORK!!!1
American Skankwoman Update
http://thesuperficial.com/2006/11/britney_spears_really_wants_yo.html
It's hard to believe that I once wanted to fap to that. giggity giggity giggity
Posted by: Spanky at November 28, 2006 03:01 PM (wkyrW)
5
Oooo, that's gotta be chilly.
Posted by: Casca at November 28, 2006 05:10 PM (2gORp)
6
First rule of image rehabilitation: Do not hang out with Paris Hilton.
Posted by: annika at November 28, 2006 10:53 PM (oantJ)
14kb generated in CPU 0.0111, elapsed 0.0925 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.0857 seconds, 151 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
61 queries taking 0.0857 seconds, 151 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
