July 18, 2005
Just Plain Weird
From
The Sacramento Bee:
Woodland police have arrested a man discovered skinning a pit bull, his hands drenched in blood, law enforcement officials said.
Officers called to the scene Saturday found transient John Hummer, 47, alongside a Woodland gas station skinning the dog with a knife, said Sgt. Davis of the Woodland Police Department.
. . .
The dog was dead at the scene and already partially skinned, he added.
Animal control officers collected the body and determined that the dog had several puncture wounds and had died within the previous hour, said Davis.
The dog had no collar and the owners are unknown, according to Davis.
Hummer was charged with maliciously and intentionally killing a dog, a felony, and booked into the Yolo County Jail, Davis said.
i'm no fan of pit bulls, but that's just freaky. There's some real weirdos in this part of California. i wonder if he was going to make himself a coat?
Posted by: annika at
02:35 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 162 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Pit bulls are evil, but intentionally manipulating the carcass of any animal is a great sign of mental imbalance.
"Land of fruits and nuts" indeed.
Posted by: Mark at July 18, 2005 03:12 PM (Vg0tt)
2
That bum coulda got at least a couple of dollars at the nearest Korean resturant.
Posted by: Kyle at July 18, 2005 04:17 PM (7Re84)
3
Sheesh, you mean you don't knife pitbulls, skin them and eat their livers raw? Shit everyone does it down here when it gets over 100 degrees?
Posted by: Casca at July 18, 2005 04:17 PM (qBTBH)
4
Eeek! I'm not a big fan of pit bulls either, but gah. That is
too freaky.
On the brightside, maybe he's like the freak in
Silence of the Lambs and decided he'd try it out on pit bulls first. Good thing he's in custody.
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at July 18, 2005 04:28 PM (K0qzr)
5
I wonder if there is more to it than what they are saying? Because if he was a transient I don't see why he wouldn't kill and eat a dog? If he has a way to cook it, it would be a lot better than digging through trash cans for spoiled food. If I were homeless I'd eat a dog before I would beg for food or money that's for sure.
Now if he was just mutilating it and playing with the body parts that is an entirely different story.
Posted by: Andy at July 18, 2005 05:06 PM (l04c2)
6
Damn! You're getting some interesting readers around here Anni. I'm making chili, and in honor of this story, and Andy's views on self-reliance, I'm going to name it "Anni's Dead Dog Chili". I just need to find a pitbull.
Posted by: Casca at July 18, 2005 06:04 PM (qBTBH)
7
i ate a pit bull liver once
with some fava beans and a nice chiaaanti
f-f-f-f-f-f-f-ffff
Posted by: annika at July 18, 2005 08:02 PM (Bq2Q0)
8
LMAO, you made my liver hurt!
Posted by: Casca at July 18, 2005 09:54 PM (qBTBH)
9
I oppose the death penalty, save for cretins like this fellow. As a former pit owner, I'm in the "no bad pit bulls, only bad pit bull owners" camp...
Posted by: Hugo at July 19, 2005 03:30 PM (uQK+G)
10
How's about a death penalty for pit bulls?
Posted by: Mark at July 19, 2005 08:25 PM (442Yb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 14, 2005
Just One More Reason To Love The Space Program...
...multi-use
technology?
Posted by: annika at
09:35 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
i'd be too embarrassed to buy a vibrating razor. i can't imagine putting a shaky piece of sharp metal on my delicate parts anyway. i do however, love my
toothbrush. Like the copy says: "more . . . action in every stroke."
Which reminds me of a Dame Edna bit i heard once. She was talking about her gyno, who had retired because he got old and his hand began to shake, which she added "is not really a bad thing in a gyno..."
Posted by: annika at July 14, 2005 08:10 PM (Wugvc)
2
Mweh! This give a whole new meaning to the term "vibrational loads testing"!
Posted by: Go 4 TLI at July 16, 2005 06:39 PM (1+q4W)
3
My better judgment tells me to drop this subject -- in fact, my better judgment screamed at me not to raise the subject in the first place -- but I can't help pressing on just a little further.
"i can't imagine putting a shaky piece of sharp metal on my delicate parts anyway."
Like most modern razors, the M3 Power has detachable blades.
Posted by: Matt at July 18, 2005 12:13 PM (10G2T)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Don't Tell Me...
...
werewolves don't exist.
Posted by: annika at
09:32 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"He's the hairy-headed gent, who ran amok in Kent.
Lately he's been overheard in Mayfair."
"Well I saw Lon Chaney walkin' with the Queen,
doin' the Werewolves of London."
Posted by: Jason O. at July 14, 2005 01:43 PM (2CAKL)
2
Send a pussy to do a dickheads job.
Posted by: Casca at July 14, 2005 05:52 PM (qBTBH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Santorum-Fart Update
Again, Santorum's
an idiot.
Posted by: annika at
07:32 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I actually don't think he's an idiot, but some of the stances he takes on issues shows a contortion of reason by fringe ideological axioms and heuristics.
Misguided might be a better term.
Posted by: will at July 14, 2005 10:36 AM (GzvlQ)
2
He's both a genuine conservative and a genuine knob. I'd like to thank him for putting me in the position of having to agree with Ted Kennedy. That is, if by "thank" I actually mean "bitchslap". Tomato, to-mah-to, that sort of thing.
Posted by: physics geek at July 14, 2005 12:57 PM (Xvrs7)
3
What's the Statute of Limitations on his crime. Since the quote is 3 years old, it smacks of a PR campaign, perhaps by his opposition in Pa. or one of their supporters. Having been around a bit myself, I can tell you Boston has its own signature, just as San Fran or NYC. I didn't find what he said, long ago, so far off base.
Posted by: Lonetown at July 14, 2005 04:17 PM (yc0gA)
4
Eh, you young punks, wait til you're forty and have some sense. Santorum is fabulous. A true conservative, articulate, presidential timber one day. They're just trying to get a few rounds in his ass while he's young.
Posted by: Casca at July 14, 2005 06:06 PM (qBTBH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 13, 2005
Was A Sheriff's Helicopter Shot Down?
Breaking news here in Sacramento.
A County Sheriff's helicopter crashed near Lake Natoma in Folsom. Channel 13 reports that the media has been excluded from the scene and that it is being considered a "crime scene."
According to Channel 10:
Multiple witnesses say the copter was flying low over the Lake Natoma area when popping sounds were heard and flames were spotted shooting from the craft's engines. The copter's tail appeared to break up in mid-air before the craft hit a hillside on the north side of Lake Natoma and rolled down the hill.
Weird.
Posted by: annika at
10:10 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Has there been any more news on this?
Posted by: Victor at July 14, 2005 01:19 PM (L3qPK)
2
no word on the cause of the crash. it's looking more like an accident to me.
Posted by: annika at July 14, 2005 06:29 PM (Wugvc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 10, 2005
Bono Plans A Big Concert
Hey, i just heard that Bono is planning to have a big concert to end world poverty. i think that's a great idea. All these bands are going to participate. i hope they can do it, becuz poverty is a bad thing. Lots of money should do the trick. Yay Bono.
They're going to call it Live-8. It's kind of a reference to Live-Aid, which was the name of that concert that ended world hunger back in the eighties.
Anybody know when this big concert is going to happen? i don't want to miss it.
Posted by: annika at
09:41 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 105 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The only poverty those rock bands are going to cure is their own. Their CD sales soar after each of these concerts.
Posted by: Jake at July 10, 2005 10:12 AM (r/5D/)
2
you know as much as i despise most political celebrities, I have to say i respect Bono. He has been on message since very early in his career, and he has always been very inclusive. Meaning he asks people to join his cause not trying to shame them into it. I just wish he was less succesful in convincing our politicians into throwing away our money.
Posted by: Kyle at July 10, 2005 10:50 AM (7Re84)
3
I'm pretty sure that it's next month.
Posted by: Casca at July 10, 2005 11:01 AM (qBTBH)
4
I remain ambivalent about Bono. Part of me respects him for living what he believes, being simultaneously passionate and intelligent. Still, I have a deep suspicion about a professional singer/song writer discussing things like international economics. Does he truly know the full effects of his suggestions? Does have any idea what he's talking about?
Imagine for a moment some U. of Chicago economist trying to produce a rock album. How would we react?
Posted by: Mark at July 11, 2005 07:36 AM (Vg0tt)
5
well of course, i regularly talk about things like interntional politics, for which i have no qualifications. but then i wish i had as many fans as bono.
Posted by: annika at July 11, 2005 08:29 AM (weVdb)
6
Annika,
I think the fact that he has the massive audience that he has places a huge burden on him (and celebrities in general) to make sure they are CORRECT or atleast in the universe of correct.
Posted by: Mark at July 13, 2005 08:11 AM (Vg0tt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 05, 2005
Thank You Fox News
i'd like to take this opportunity to thank Fox News for their 72 hour round-the-clock coverage of the Aruba and Montana abduction stories. i wonder when they will change their name to the "Freako Crime News Network?"
i don't know what is more scintillating television, the panel discussions where "journalists" psychoanalyze the freako perpetrators ad nauseam, or the remote updates from the van der Sloot compound every fifteen minutes.
It's not like there might be some other things going on in the world right now. i mean, come on. i had to watch CNN! i will watch CNN if i have to, but i never feel good about doing it.
MSNBC is out of the question. But Atlas is right. Fox News is becoming unwatchable.
Posted by: annika at
07:11 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't watch it either, but Greta's ratings are going through the roof. We seem to be in the curmudgeonly minority.
Posted by: The Owner's Manual at July 05, 2005 08:58 AM (LMArC)
2
I can't stand it either. When will they bring back the psychic (psycho?)who told us Chandra Levy would be found in a wooded area. I guess her body is near the water. Why don't they just pick the next winning Powerball numbers anyway? We can't possibly hear about anything that makes a difference, like a war, or a Supreme Court vacancy. Not when we can talk about who's doing who in Hollywood. Fox sucks - unfortunately the alternatives also suck. I've started watching the History Channel for entertainment. I'll get my news from the net.
Posted by: MarkD at July 05, 2005 10:51 AM (oQofX)
3
Of course, my favorite Fox show is Brett Hume's show. I can barely ever watch Hannity and Colmes. But what's up with Greta and the viewers? Her show is the most boring, repetitive show in television history, and her ratings are shooting up?! Its enough to make you want to join the Dem elitists, and look down my nose at the "unenlightened masses."
Posted by: gcotharn at July 05, 2005 11:32 AM (lu3H/)
4
You might consider diversifying your news sources, as I began to feel almost hypnotized by FN. The Newshour with Jim Lehrer is actually a pretty level source, and C-Span coupled with TIVO allows one to get it straight from the horses mouth. Indeed, I like to look at both sides, just to see who's selectively trumpeting data-mined nuggets.
Posted by: will at July 05, 2005 12:19 PM (GzvlQ)
5
We've regrettably been stuck with naught but CNN for a few months now--it is no different. (and no better)
But I do miss Special Report...Lou Dobbs or Aaron Brown just...suck.
Posted by: Christopher Cross at July 05, 2005 12:59 PM (ElDaS)
6
Y'all dare criticize the almighty televised media sanctuary of the Right?! Blasphemy!
Posted by: reagan80 at July 05, 2005 01:22 PM (hlMFQ)
7
The internet alternative news sites were invented for those like me who are sick of hollywood and pervert oriented T.V. media. I dont watch any of that crap anymore and i dont miss it.
Posted by: Jeff at July 05, 2005 02:48 PM (Zq5kW)
8
You're right. The Halloway story is not news, tragic as it is. I am so sick of the Fox coverage of it, that today I switched off Fox and turned on CNN Headline News. I feel sick with sin.
Posted by: Iam Doubt at July 05, 2005 05:00 PM (vFILA)
9
just turn the boob tube to the off position and let the media bloviate to nothingness! their meds will finally begin to work. us hustings will heal on our own not being made crazy by the tv media.....
Posted by: bill at July 05, 2005 05:08 PM (iJUdF)
10
Avoid Greta and Geraldo altogether, and Fox News is more watchable.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at July 05, 2005 07:05 PM (Qrfcx)
11
You know, I couldn't take "The Laci Peterson Show with Greta," and equally despise the re-tooled "The Missing Chick in Aruba Show with Greta." Ugh. What a waste of airtime.
At the risk of sounding like stone-hearted bastard, I don't give a flying fig about all of these missing attractive (white) women. Or that boy scout. Sure, it's terrible for their loved ones, but it has absolutely no effect on my life.
Posted by: Micah at July 05, 2005 08:45 PM (v/oTo)
12
It's the global village. Get used to it.
Roy Cohn, Juan Peron, Toscanini, Dacron
Dien Bien Phu Falls, Rock Around the Clock
Posted by: Casca at July 05, 2005 09:27 PM (qBTBH)
13
Einstein, James Dean, Brooklyn's got a winning team
Davy Crockett, "Peter Pan", Elvis Presley, Disneyland
Damn. I'm probably younger than all of you, and I still remember that song from when I was in kindergarten.
Posted by: reagan80 at July 06, 2005 03:54 PM (hlMFQ)
14
Fox should change their name to LNN, the Lascivious News Network. Sadly, salasciousness, sans substance, SELLS.
Posted by: NuggetMaven at July 07, 2005 09:37 AM (DP5IG)
15
Greta is wonderful you guys just don't get it she's a class act! When she covers what others are doing is when she becomes stale! Go Gretta!!!!!
Posted by: mark at July 15, 2005 12:33 PM (M7kiy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 01, 2005
What A Freaking Idiot
And i don't mean idiot in the sense of a person with whom i have a disagreement.
i mean literally, an idiot, a person of subnormal intelligence, slow-witted, an imbecile, a moron, a cretin, affected by a profound mental retardation.
Stupid.
i want to post in full this exchange between Nancy Pulaski and a reporter, reprinted by The Corner, so i can refer back to it whenever i need a good laugh.
Reporter: Later this morning, many Members of the House Republican leadership, along with John Cornyn from the Senate, are holding a news conference on eminent domain, the decision of the Supreme Court the other day, and they are going to offer legislation that would restrict it, prohibiting federal funds from being used in such a manner.
Two questions. What was your reaction to the Supreme Court decision on this topic, and what do you think about legislation to, in the minds of opponents at least, remedy or changing it?
Ms. Pelosi: As a Member of Congress, and actually all of us and anyone who holds a public office in our country, we take an oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States. Very central to that in that Constitution is the separation of powers. I believe that whatever you think about a particular decision of the Supreme Court, and I certainly have been in disagreement with them on many occasions, it is not appropriate for the Congress to say we're going to withhold funds for the Court because we don't like a decision.
Reporter: Not on the Court, withhold funds from the eminent domain purchases that wouldn't involve public use. I apologize if I framed the question poorly. It wouldn't be withholding federal funds from the Court, but withhold Federal funds from eminent domain type purchases that are not just involved in public good.
Ms. Pelosi: Again, without focusing on the actual decision, just to say that when you withhold funds from enforcing a decision of the Supreme Court you are, in fact, nullifying a decision of the Supreme Court. This is in violation of the respect for separation of church -- powers in our Constitution, church and state as well. Sometimes the Republicans have a problem with that as well. But forgive my digression.
So the answer to your question is, I would oppose any legislation that says we would withhold funds for the enforcement of any decision of the Supreme Court no matter how opposed I am to that decision. And I'm not saying that I'm opposed to this decision, I'm just saying in general.
Reporter: Could you talk about this decision? What you think of it?
Ms. Pelosi: It is a decision of the Supreme Court. If Congress wants to change it, it will require legislation of a level of a constitutional amendment. So this is almost as if God has spoken. It's an elementary discussion now. They have made the decision.
Reporter: Do you think it is appropriate for municipalities to be able to use eminent domain to take land for economic development?
Ms. Pelosi: The Supreme Court has decided, knowing the particulars of this case, that that was appropriate, and so I would support that.
She totally misunderstood the question, even after the reporter explained it to her again in an extremely polite way. It's obvious that the Democratic leader of the House of Representatives had no clue about a recent, highly publicized and important Supreme Court decision. Or what her fellow legislators were trying to do about it. No fucking clue.
If i wasn't so disgusted by Pelosi, and the fact that the House Democrats consider her fit to be their leader, i would almost feel sorry for her. She's so completely in over her head, it's a joke.
Posted by: annika at
06:50 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 637 words, total size 4 kb.
1
She is the sort of politician that rotten buroughs produce. Dull children of orthodoxy. It's hard to find Republicans this dumb, but there are a few out there. It's more glaring with the D's because all you've needed to play for their team for two generations is absolute fealty to the shiboleths of liberalism and union thugery.
Posted by: Casca at July 01, 2005 11:14 PM (qBTBH)
2
She doesn't seem very bright, and is usually semi-belligerant. She just parrots the same phrases, the same slogans, over and over. It's like dealing with a 1950s robot.
Posted by: Mark at July 02, 2005 12:20 AM (hI4J4)
3
just another braying nabob of negativism. no plan, no program, no future in politics. just sit there all wide eyed and bray and bitch!
Posted by: bill at July 02, 2005 12:48 AM (q1eBl)
4
Hey Annie, why complain?
Nancy Pelosi, along with Harry Reid, Tom Daschle, Howard Dean,John Kerry and now Dick Durbin are the reason that the Democrats have become and will remain the semi-permanent minority in the United States Congress.
You want some smart ones to take over and replace them?
Bill Clinton is a smart one; look what he did to us. Be care ful what you wish for.
Let sleeping dogs lie.
I love Nancy Pelosi, long may she remain the Minority Leader.
Posted by: shelly at July 02, 2005 03:48 AM (pO1tP)
5
Both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Washington Post cleaned up her remarks so that she moved above the cretin level.
Just as MSM ignored Dick Durban's remarks for a whole week until he apologized.
MSM protects its own. That's how those idiots stay in power.
(Via Betsy's Page)
Posted by: Jake at July 02, 2005 07:28 AM (r/5D/)
6
Oy. Vay.
She is allowed to vote on issues that impact our lives!
Sometimes it's really embarassing to be a Caleeefornyuhn.
Posted by: tallglassofmilk at July 02, 2005 09:47 AM (e1sTR)
7
i can't get past....in one response; dragging in the separation of church and state; accusing repubs of not understanding the principle; and in the next response, equating a scotus decision to that of a deity.
i don't get it.
Posted by: louielouie at July 02, 2005 10:09 AM (xKfMm)
8
Until seeing Pelosi, I thought California could never elect a politician with a lower IQ than Boxer.
Posted by: gcotharn at July 02, 2005 11:42 AM (SU2IN)
9
gcotharn..didn't you mean to say "a lower IQ than *a* Boxer", referring to the breed of dog?
Posted by: David Foster at July 02, 2005 02:25 PM (7TmYw)
10
My favorite quote in that exchange:
"So this is almost as if God has spoken."
Ah, those filthy statist liberals never cease to amaze me with their connivances.
Posted by: reagan80 at July 03, 2005 07:28 PM (06ZjJ)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at July 05, 2005 01:06 AM (7XTy8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Shark Culture (Scarborough's An Idiot)
The Maximum Leader has written off Scarborough Country for good, vowing never to watch the show again. That apparently leaves Joe Scarborough's mom as the only viewer left.
The reason cited by the Maximum Leader was an eyebrow raising statement by the former congressman, or mayor, or whatever, regarding the recent spate of shark attacks in Florida. He apparently implied that the source of these shark attacks was the difference between human and shark "cultures."
Perhaps he might consider interviewing Greg Norman for more insight into this theory, i don't know. Maybe Jerry Tarkanian is available for a remote, it's worth a try.
Freaking idiot.
Anyways, Maximum Leader had this to say in response:
Great jeezey chreezey. Somehow it is comforting to know that if only we would bother to translate the literature of the shark, we could avoid sharks attacking humans. We should feel guilty for not knowing the intricacies of shark interpretive dance. There would never be another shark on human attack if we could marvel at the splendor of the great underwater shark cities and grow to know their ancient history. Shark feeding frenzies off the beaches would be harmful only to baitfish if we could read the poetry of the shark Maya Angelou or ponder the profundity of the shark Plato.
Of course, it is partially the fault of the sharks. Have they bothered to understand our culture? Have they read Faulkner, Tolstoy, or Hardy? Do they know the tales of Hemmingway? (Okay, scratch Hemmingway...) Have they seen the pyramids?
. . .
Understand shark culture.... What a friggin' idiot.
Thanks for the laugh, ML, i've never seen you so worked up, LOL.
[Oh btw, ML, i like how you've taken to using my subtle misspelling trick on Ernest Hemingway's name. Or perhaps you meant to type Herringway. ba-dum-bump.]
Posted by: annika at
06:49 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 285 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Its become obvious that Democrat party is a party without a soul. They are never clear about what to believe without recent poll data so they know the popular opinion first, and they are completely obsessed with stopping the president and every turn. We are witnessing a political party meltdown before our eyes with the lone obsession of gaining back power by any destructive means necessary.
Posted by: Jeff at July 02, 2005 07:49 AM (Zq5kW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
49kb generated in CPU 0.0186, elapsed 0.0589 seconds.
68 queries taking 0.046 seconds, 212 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.