November 01, 2006

First DWTS Post Of The Season

eands.jpg

Just because I haven't posted about Dancing With The Stars this season doesn't mean that I haven't been as obsessed as ever with the show.

I have a question about last night's competition. Did you see it? During Emmitt and Cheryl's rumba, didn't Cheryl's hand land squarely on Emmitt's little umpire at one point? And didn't Cheryl suddenly realize where it was and then move it quickly to the side? And wasn't Emmitt's little umpire signaling touchdown at that very moment?

I think so.

I also think Mrs. Smith is probably not going to let Emmitt and Cheryl spend another 13 days together "rehearsing."

Okay I'm off to watch the rest of the results show.

Update: When they announced that Il Divo would be performing tonight, I honestly expected them to sing "Whip It."

Update 2: I'm sorry to see Monique and Louie go. Monique really was fun to watch and the judges weren't always fair to her. Next week's elimination will be impossible, because the final three teams are all so good.

Update 3: YouTube just posted the Rumba, check it out for yourself.

Posted by: annika at 09:37 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 197 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Pretty hard to physically be that close to a gorgeous woman, and not have all the blood rush to the little head. Thus, brainlock. More divorces happen that way. Wives tend to be narrow minded.

Posted by: Casca at November 02, 2006 08:01 AM (Y7t14)

2 Oh yes, she definitely grabbed his crank.

Posted by: Casca at November 03, 2006 08:54 AM (2gORp)

3 I'm a little late to the party here. Sorry I missed the crotch-grab. I'm usually a dedicated viewer, but sick kids screw up the whole program. If that's Emmitt's little umpire, rather than some kind of shadow or fold in his pants, all I can say is, well, this. Cheryl definitely has a thing goin', but Edyta's the one who really does it for me. Fortunately I have a defense mechanism against nubile young temptresses: I'm poor, out of shape, mediocre-looking, married, a father, and an unknown. While none of these alone is absolute protection, together they convey near-total immunity. So there's one reason to be glad I'm not Emmitt.

Posted by: Matt at November 03, 2006 09:13 AM (10G2T)

4 Oh, yeah! I forgot "rapidly approaching middle age."

Posted by: Matt at November 03, 2006 09:14 AM (10G2T)

5 How do YOU define middle age?

Posted by: Sven Svensson at November 03, 2006 10:51 AM (76+ro)

6 Eh, roughly mid-forties on up to . . . I don't know, exactly. OK, so I've got almost a decade to go. Whatever. A little hyperbole never hurt anyone.

Posted by: Matt at November 03, 2006 12:03 PM (10G2T)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
15kb generated in CPU 0.0133, elapsed 0.0603 seconds.
61 queries taking 0.0527 seconds, 150 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.