Anyone who tries this, let me know if it works.

Posted by: annika at 10:02 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.

Congratulations to Captain Elizabeth A. Okoreeh-Baah, USMC. She's the first woman to take on the very tricky V-22 Osprey aircraft. Good luck to her. She sounds like she has the right stuff.

Captain Elizabeth A. Okoreeh-Baah spent the first five and a half years of her career in the Marine Corps as a CH-46E “Sea Knight” pilot, but when Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron-263 began transitioning to the Osprey Program while she was stationed there, she became one of the first female pilots to begin training on the controls of the tiltrotor aircraft.

. . .

“She’s going to go a long way because she never quits. She can succeed at anything she puts her mind to,” said Okoreeh-Baah’s father, Isaac K. Okoreeh-Baah Sr., a native of Ghana, North Africa. “She gets that from me, I think.”

The controversial Osprey is supposed to take off like a helicopter and then fly like an airplane by tilting its huge propellers forward.

Here's some cool video of the Osprey in action.

Before the Osprey, there was always a trade off between fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. The spinning blades of a helicopter make it inherently slower than a regular airplane, with a shorter range and a lower top altitude. But fixed wings need a runway. The Osprey gives you get the best of both worlds: the speed, range and ceiling of an airplane, plus the vertical take-off and hovering capability of a helicopter. The V-22 is designed to replace the big dual rotor CH-46 Sea Knight, which has been around since 1960.

The Osprey is controversial because the military spent a lot of money on it and then it started crashing. A lot. There was a time when the DoD wanted to cancel the program. All I know is when I tried flying my dad's computer game Osprey, I kept crashing it. So I've not always been a fan of the plane (or helicopter, or whatever).

The 1986 estimated cost of a single V-22 was about $24 million with a projected 923 to be built. The first Bush administration cancelled the project in April 1989, by which time the cost of a single craft was estimated at $35 million. However, Congress continued to allocate funding for the program in a November 1989 authorization. Throughout Secretary of Defense Richard B. CheneyÂ’s tenure, he and Congress wrestled over the question of the V-22 as he felt the project would cost more than the amount appropriated. Eventually he relented, proposing that $1.5 billion be spent in fiscal years 1992 and 1993 to develop the project. The arrival of the Clinton administration into the White House in 1992 provided new support for the program.

Osprey crashes have resulted in 30 deaths. No one died in a June 11, 1991, Osprey crash, but a crash July 20, 1992, in Virginia killed three Marines and four civilians. The Osprey was grounded for 11 months after this crash. A crash in Arizona April 8, 2000, killed 19 Marines, grounding the aircraft for two months. Another crash in North Carolina Dec. 11 of the same year killed four Marines. After the December crash, the Osprey was grounded until May 29, 2002.

Supposedly all the bugs have been worked out. So I'll keep my fingers crossed, and hope that the Osprey lives up to its promise.

Posted by: annika at 09:36 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 606 words, total size 4 kb.

I saw no reason to want a video Ipod, until I discovered that there is a "Strong Bad Email" video podcast. Now I must have one.

Dammit!

Posted by: annika at 07:46 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 39 words, total size 1 kb.

Best quote: "I thought this thing was sick."

Have fun guys!

Posted by: annika at 06:38 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Homina-homina-homina-homina . . . [uhhhHHH] [sigh] I'm going to take a nap now.

Posted by: Matt at March 17, 2006 07:09 AM (10G2T)

2 Hugo isn't gonna like it. I wouldn't mind getting one to keep the neighborhood vermin in check.

Posted by: d-rod at March 17, 2006 07:13 AM (k9puX)

3 This thing is phallic. There's nothing like having a bigger, faster, more powerful, more accurate weapon. You lug it around with pride. You yearn for opportunities to deploy it. “You can put six rounds on target in under three seconds,” Flanery said. “I thought this thing was sick.”

Posted by: gcotharn at March 17, 2006 10:15 AM (3Sbj7)

4 Yeah, the 203 always was a worthless piece of shit. It's about time our grenadiers had some firepower. Now if we only still had the flechette round.

Posted by: Casca at March 17, 2006 12:09 PM (y9m6I)

5 Yup, gotta agree with Casca, the 203 was a real piece of shit. You couldn't interdict a coca sack laden burro led by a ten year old in the Columbian highlands with it. I once fired one at a platoon leader in Granada and he still rode the wave on to the beach. Real crap piece of hardware. My fingers statred twitching when I read the piece on the M-32.

Posted by: Strawman at March 17, 2006 04:10 PM (0ZdtC)

6 Go away ya draft dodgin' shitstain.

Posted by: Casca at March 17, 2006 04:36 PM (2gORp)

7 The forerunner of this weapon can be seen on the old Christopher Walken movie Dogs of War. But it looks like this one has a higher rate of fire, and is more accurate. (Although you don't have to be too accurate with 40mm greandes)

Posted by: Kyle N at March 18, 2006 04:52 AM (FBJ4S)

8 Nice one Casca. You're such a good advert for the military mind ne step above a prokaryote.

Posted by: Strawman at March 19, 2006 01:09 PM (0ZdtC)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

The Robotic Mule.

Wanna bet the second generation will kick back?

Posted by: annika at 10:23 AM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.