? i mean, maybe she doesn't have any, you know what i mean? Which would support my theory that she's really a robot. A dim-witted, bubble headed robot who can't sing.
1
For serious skankiness, Britney can't hold a candle to
this.
Posted by: Brant at January 29, 2004 07:36 PM (uUZu1)
2
Although I will say that she does have... you know what I mean?
Dirty old git that I am... back to blogging.
Posted by: Brant at January 29, 2004 07:50 PM (uUZu1)
3
I think you are just a "Britney-wanabe" who needs theapy to discover the truth about your inner envy (or penis envy...or whatever...) Where's Freud when you need him/her/it anyway? Damnitall! Go ahead, bitch, blog away at me!
Posted by: JT at January 29, 2004 08:29 PM (hGXpF)
4
I'm sure they're there somewhere. Needs further research!
Posted by: Pixy Misa at January 29, 2004 08:38 PM (kOqZ6)
5
She may not look the way you'd like her to look,
She may not act the way you'd like her to act,
She may not sing the song you'd like to hear,
but she can carry a tune. Blame the RIAA.
Posted by: ascap_scab at January 30, 2004 02:32 AM (+LXLB)
6
Somebody snipped da nips?
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at January 30, 2004 07:53 AM (2T2Ns)
7
I have a friend who used to do digital retouching for Victoria Secret catalogs. The technical term is nipplectomy.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at January 30, 2004 07:57 AM (UquFN)
8
Low cut dress = taped nips.
Who dat up there that said Britney could carry a tune? Puh-leaze.
Posted by: Jim at January 30, 2004 11:23 AM (IOwam)
Posted by: Brant at January 31, 2004 06:48 AM (GFYXP)
10
Britney doesn't sing. She buzzes. Her voice has no power. Christina Aguilera employs the same five vocal tricks in all her songs, but she's still a far better singer than B-yotch, by far.
Live from the Land of Rare Buttfloss,
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at January 31, 2004 06:48 AM (af5WO)
11
That article was hilarious, Brant.
But i'm still left wondering. What happened to her nips? i don't think they were airbrushed, since i saw the same pic on Yahoo news photos. But, it is interesting that there are no other angles of her in that dress, so maybe it was re-touched and the only shot that was made available to the press is the nipple free one.
Posted by: annika! at January 31, 2004 03:45 PM (4qgBd)
12
Annika:
Truth be told, my theory is that it's due to breast implants. As someone who has taken a purely anthropological interest in pictures of nude women who have had boob jobs, one thing I have noticed is that a bad boob job can cause the nips to point downward. Sad, but true.
Posted by: Brant at February 01, 2004 08:23 AM (GFYXP)
13
yeah, but that britney foto just shows that nipple occludity has the positive effect on fan drop-out-ivity
it's literally a tittilating experince for about 5-8 seconds.
somehow, the producers found it a good idea to push her breasts down to an awkward and unnatural position to show more skin, ironically making the poor girl look deformed and uncomfortable...
Where is this to lead?
I hope it leads to liberated (feeling notwithstanding) women designing their own wardrobes with their own gumption to how they feel most comfortable.
-- font9a
Posted by: font9a at June 08, 2004 10:05 PM (jbYXP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
