October 05, 2005
It Was Bound To Happen...
Brittany Sex Tape release feared.
My prediction: she still has no talent.
Update: Her lawyers concur.
A copy of the original tape viewed by the couple's lawyers elicited laughter and disgust.
That's harsh, dudes.
Update 2: My sources in the media have obtained for me a copy of the tape. It's dark and filmed in night vision green, but i was able to transcribe some of the audio for you.
Brittany: "is that better hun?"
Kevin: "uh-uh"
Brittany: "here let me..."
Kevin: "I don't..."
Brittany: "it's not..."
Kevin: "just..."
Brittany: "uhhh..."
Kevin: "maybe if you just..."
Brittany: "huh?"
Kevin: "ow"
Brittany: "sorry, I..."
Kevin: "no keep going..."
Brittany: "I'm..."
Kevin: "there... no... "
Brittany: "ow"
Kevin: "what?"
Brittany: "let's try it this, uh..."
Kevin: "wait..."
Brittany: "how about now?"
Kevin: "it's gone..."
Brittany: "what?"
Kevin: "it's no good..."
Brittany: "huh?"
Kevin: "sorry I'm just..."
Brittany: "huh?"
Kevin: "you're..."
Brittany: "i can't..."
Kevin: "ow"
It goes on like that for several minutes. Quite boring, actually.
Posted by: annika at
06:47 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 170 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Casca at October 05, 2005 07:07 AM (qBTBH)
2
Kevin: "ow"
I'm never gonna live this down, am I.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at October 05, 2005 08:09 AM (1PcL3)
3
That dialogue is too good to have been made up. I'm sensing personal experience.
Posted by: Wayne at October 05, 2005 08:19 AM (lXOo9)
4
"My prediction: she still has no talent."
Musical talent or sexual talent?
Posted by: Mark at October 05, 2005 09:33 AM (Vg0tt)
Posted by: MCPO Airdale at October 06, 2005 07:49 AM (WOQ34)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 15, 2005
Skankwoman Open Comments
Brittany has a baby boy! Please use the comments to let us know what you bought the Federlines from their baby shower gift registry.
i got them the baby blue mini cuspidor from Oshkosh B'Gosh and a little tin of Baby Skoal.
Posted by: annika at
10:27 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Spears, who married Federline in September last year, had been previously reported as saying she planned to have the baby by Caesarean section to avoid the pain of a natural birth."
What a fucking whackdoodle. This freakshow will go on for decades.
An Handmaid that is Mistress
We need not call upon,
A Fool when he is full of Meat
Will fall asleep anon.
An Odious Woman Married
May bear a babe and mend,
But a Servant when He Reigneth
Is Confusion to the end.
Posted by: Casca at September 15, 2005 10:51 AM (qBTBH)
2
I propose we take up a collection for a vasectomy AND a tubal ligation. Just in case.
Posted by: GLN Admin at September 15, 2005 11:41 AM (YID5l)
3
I'm gonna start a trust fund for that kid's therapy.
Posted by: Victor at September 15, 2005 11:47 AM (L3qPK)
4
I dedicated a post to them.
Posted by: Dawn Summers at September 15, 2005 12:44 PM (sa6wF)
5
On the other hand, I'll wager that the Spears/Federline child grows up much more normal than Gwynyth Paltrow's kid Apple, I heard she was already feeding the baby hummus.
Posted by: Kyle N at September 16, 2005 03:40 AM (oZxvB)
6
Not as many comments as you thought, eh? Howzabout an
American Skankwoman's Demon Child Haiku Contest?
The skank is a momma.
Who will Kevin knock up next?
Maybe....
annika?
I've never been more grateful you're on the left coast than I am right now. Still, perhaps I should look into faking my own death.
Posted by: Victor at September 16, 2005 11:48 AM (L3qPK)
7
Tut tut Victor, I never thought you the type to fake anything.
Posted by: Casca at September 16, 2005 12:47 PM (qBTBH)
8
its BRITNEY not brittany. not like her name isnt flashed and billboarded 24/7
Posted by: amanda at September 17, 2005 07:16 PM (6krEN)
Posted by: Jeff at September 18, 2005 06:59 AM (n+RKP)
10
In all fariness, they aren't mouthing off about leaving the country. IMHO she rode mediocre talent and decent looks to a better than average trailer trash career. Bad choices in men isn't a felony, not in NY anyway. As far as I know, whe's not involved in the payola scam with the radio stations.
I hope to live long enough to piss on Jane Fonda's grave. Britney isn't worth my attention, or yours.
Posted by: MarkD at September 18, 2005 08:11 PM (X9njN)
11
i misspelled her name on purpose, Amanda.
Posted by: annika at September 19, 2005 09:47 AM (zAOEU)
12
You bought them a spitoon?
Posted by: Mark at September 19, 2005 10:24 AM (Vg0tt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 30, 2005
AmSkank Update
For those who are interested,
Wizbang has posted some photos of Brittany in full frontal pregnancy fashion. She looks...uh...happy, i guess.
Link thanks to Victor, who raced out to see that new movie only to be disappointed when he discovered it was not in fact called Ratman Begins.
Posted by: annika at
07:40 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
WHAT!?!?!? No snarky comment on her halter top, tie-dyed sarong, and cowboy boots?
I'm incredibly disappointed...OTOH, I guess it's too easy...
Posted by: Victor at June 30, 2005 08:07 AM (L3qPK)
2
But the Kabbalah bracelet is still very much in place...
Posted by: Hugo at June 30, 2005 03:19 PM (vXMv1)
3
Reprising Demi Moore? More like reprising Anna-Nicole. I'm no fashion maven, but nothing says Southern-whitetrash-hillbilly-slut like cowboy boots and a halter top.
Posted by: Casca at June 30, 2005 06:57 PM (qBTBH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 04, 2005
Psst, Wanna Buy Some Pee?
Some sick entrepeneur
dug Brittany's pregnancy test out of a dumpster and sold it for 5 grr!
'It's hard to put a price on Britney Spears' urine,' Golden Palace spokesman Drew Black told The Associated Press Wednesday.
Golden Palace says it purchased the test from Ottawa radio station Hot 89.9, which insists the test was retrieved from the trash outside Spears' Los Angeles hotel room months ago. The station didn't leak news of the test until Spears and husband Kevin Federline revealed her pregnancy to the public last month.
Student loan funds are running low, so i was toying with the idea of putting up some blog ads for extra money, but fuck that. There's easier money to be had!
i am now in the pee business. Any sickos wanna buy a tube of annie-urine, the bidding starts at five hundred a jar!
Posted by: annika at
06:38 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 151 words, total size 1 kb.
1
As sick as that is, at least they aren't selling a stool sample.
Posted by: Micah at May 04, 2005 06:45 PM (v/oTo)
2
Don't laugh too loudly, Annie.
Back when he was in the army, my brother made extra cash by selling his urine. He didn't do drugs, so he sold his clean urine to the potheads when "that time" of the month rolled around and it was time to pee all that you can pee!
--HH
Posted by: Go 4 TLI (formerly HH in Hollywood) at May 04, 2005 09:57 PM (faCTk)
3
Oh shit. There goes that idea.
Posted by: annika at May 04, 2005 10:23 PM (EOuHu)
4
strange.
i was in a graden store and they had wolf urnine and coyete urnine for sale.
I can give you the name of the place if you are intrested.
Posted by: cube at May 05, 2005 06:37 AM (nyNr0)
5
did they have any bear
ursine by any chance?
Posted by: annika at May 05, 2005 07:50 AM (zuRc4)
6
What a great investment opportunity!
Posted by: Mark at May 05, 2005 10:50 AM (Hk4wN)
7
How much for the golden shower? Would you be interested in a trade?
Posted by: Casca at May 05, 2005 03:43 PM (qBTBH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 14, 2005
All That Needs To Be Said...
...about Brittany Spears' "condition," was said by Jennifer at
Demure Thoughts:
I can just see, Brit now. Walking down Rodeo Drive 8 months pregnant with a Marlboro ULTRA Light hanging out of her mouth, her statement of sacrifice for the baby being that she gave up the Reds.
Posted by: annika at
08:22 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: mh at April 14, 2005 09:13 PM (KeMbM)
2
what happened to "skankmommy"????
Posted by: louielouie at April 14, 2005 09:15 PM (i7mWl)
3
She doesn't smoke in front of the dog, does she?
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at April 14, 2005 10:10 PM (aqpSM)
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at April 14, 2005 10:59 PM (aqpSM)
5
http://britneyfails.ytmnd.com/
http://britneyspearzhoe.ytmnd.com/ (TURN ON THE SPEAKERS!)
http://britneyspearsiswithchildgodhelpus.ytmnd.com/
http://britneyspearsistrash.ytmnd.com/
Posted by: Spanky at April 15, 2005 05:29 PM (hlMFQ)
6
The first thing that came to my mind when I heard the news was, "how is Kevin going to support all these kids once Britney dumps him?"
Posted by: Shae at April 17, 2005 07:40 PM (DOuRu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 09, 2005
Brittany Goes Clubbing With The Hot Tub Friends
In this exclusive video clip from Brittany's upcoming reality tv show, we see her out on the town with a few of the hot tub friends.
Posted by: annika at
10:59 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 42 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at April 09, 2005 10:04 PM (OpfyU)
Posted by: Scof at April 11, 2005 07:15 AM (ur/xf)
3
Annika...from downtown!!!
And the foul!!!
-Marv
Posted by: Jason O. at April 11, 2005 08:59 AM (2CAKL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 26, 2005
American Skankmommy?
We've heard the rumors before, but now
it may actually be true.
Britney Spears is three months pregnant, it has been claimed.
The pop babe, who has made no secret of her desire to start a family with second husband Kevin Federline, will reportedly announce her pregnancy within the next couple of days.
Respected American gossip columnist Norm Clarke said: 'Britney Spears. not a girl, soon to be a mommy.
She's pregnant. Look for the announcement any day now.'
Weight gain due to pregnancy could be an alternate explanation for why she was seen
without her wedding ring recently.
Well, if it's true, let me join Nikita Demosthenes, in wishing her good luck and congratulations.
Hat tip to Nikita, too.
Posted by: annika at
03:17 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 123 words, total size 1 kb.
1
O.K., I give up. Who is the father?
Posted by: shelly at March 26, 2005 09:40 PM (ywZa8)
2
Puh-leeeze, I've just spent 8 hours watching Franco Zeferelli's "Life of Christ" on the History channel.
Posted by: Casca at March 26, 2005 11:24 PM (cdv3B)
3
LMAO, that IS a priceless picture!
Posted by: Casca at March 26, 2005 11:32 PM (cdv3B)
4
No expert here, but it looks to me that if that's her at 3 months, she's going to be HUGE!
Posted by: JD at March 27, 2005 07:12 AM (J+Gcr)
5
She sure likes drinking out of little bitty bottles, doesn't she? Either that, or someone has Photoshopped the pic of her outside the convenience store in Santa Monica six months ago.
Posted by: The Owner's Manual at March 27, 2005 11:50 AM (ipiTO)
6
i would never, ever, never photoshop a picture of Brittany. How could you even accuse me of such a thing?!
Posted by: annika at March 27, 2005 12:11 PM (vl0WH)
7
It could have been photoshopped before you got it... or did you take the picture yourself?
Posted by: The Owner's Manual at March 27, 2005 09:17 PM (ipiTO)
8
Custody hearings. I look at that picture, and all I can see is custody hearings.
Posted by: gcotharn at March 28, 2005 03:21 PM (OxYc+)
9
This overrated image also known as Britney has had enough exposure, don't you think?
Posted by: Mark at March 28, 2005 11:30 PM (+6HCf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 14, 2005
American Skankwoman Update
It's been a while since i've caught up with Brittany. Despite her vow to lay low, she's been on a something of a comic rampage lately:
- At times i almost think Brittany's being ironic with us. But then i remember that irony probably requires having an IQ, which is one accessory she's never owned.
For instance, she recently promised:
In the future, I will refrain from discussing my private life in interviews. It will be expressed solely through art.
Art? Art?!
She's taken up painting, i guess. Cuz she can't be talking about what she does for a living.
- And remember when Brittany stunk up that airplane? Apparently, she and Kevin have a lot in common:
Federline's ex-girlfriend, Amy Woody, accusing Federline of . . . being hygienically impaired.
Not only is he not a daily bather, he apparently would go for days without a scrub.
Eeeew. The American Skankman!
- Brittany had some advice for Michael Jackson:
He needs someone to be like, 'ok, let's buck you up, let's give you a moustache, let's rough you up, let's go to a bar, let's get drunk and be a man.' . . . he needs to get in a fight.
Interesting idea. Although i bet if somebody punched him in the nose, they'd get a nasty splinter.
- Last Monday, Brittany and Kevin got kicked out of a Beverly Hills restaurant when she tried to eat there with her little rat, Bit Bit.
But the manager chased after the couple and said they could stay if the pup was tucked inside her bag.
Britney and dancer Kevin returned with Bit Bit in her pink holdall, emblazoned with the word BITCHY.
Notice the flip flops. She tries so hard to be skanky casual, with the ripped up shorts and the stupid trucker hats, like she don't care how she looks. But to the observant eye, Brittany's trendy $17 Havaianas betray the fact that she's just a fad follower. Here's further proof: check out the new extensions.
If she's trying to disguise herself, it might help if she left her rat at home. And the dog, too.
Update: Dawn alerts us to
an idiotic Brittany quote that i overlooked. And a double-hearsay hat tip to
Rick, too.
Posted by: annika at
10:43 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 371 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Scof at March 15, 2005 01:57 AM (VGtXe)
2
You forgot to mention carrying around a chihuahua every-fucking-where you go is the height of "trendy." And please stop comparing those little hairless tribbles to rats, please!
Posted by: Victor and his fifteen pet rats at March 15, 2005 04:54 AM (L3qPK)
Posted by: annika at March 15, 2005 09:30 AM (zAOEU)
4
When your career flourishes based solely on enticements for underage sex, ("Hit me baby" video) you can't really do too much more from there.
Tries so hard to be casual?? Annika, she's a redneck! She's following the time-honored Elvis Presley tradition of rednecks who, upon becoming rich, put a uniquely trailer-esque spin on fashion and celebrity.
Elvis gets a pass on Graceland because of his talent.
Posted by: Jason O. at March 15, 2005 10:48 AM (2CAKL)
Posted by: annika at March 15, 2005 10:54 AM (zAOEU)
6
Shutup. You'd do her too.
Posted by: Collins at March 15, 2005 02:48 PM (YkSuu)
7
Two words: hotel oscar. I guess you can take the girl outta the trailer park, but you can't take the trailer park outta the girl.
And Collins, she's getting so I
wouldn't do her. If she doesn't lay off the pork rinds and Krispy Kremes soon she's going to end up like that other trailer trash icon of pop culture, Roseanne Barr.
Posted by: Matt at March 16, 2005 03:56 AM (TLYaI)
8
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Gretchen Wilson...
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm redneck chicks...
Posted by: Radical Redneck at March 16, 2005 06:45 AM (SyyC7)
9
I remember this came up before, but Britney's not a redneck: she's white trash. It's possible to be both, but they're not the same thing. Certainly in her native Louisiana, the former can be a badge of pride, but the latter is (rightly) an insult.
Posted by: Dave J at March 18, 2005 10:38 PM (cZ/tT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 19, 2005
American Skankwoman Update
i refer you to
these excellent remarks, from
Citygurl.
Posted by: annika at
12:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That Citaygurl smells like psychotwat.
Posted by: Casca at February 19, 2005 03:05 PM (cdv3B)
2
If Brittany had any talent, I would worry about her. But she doesn't so its time for the world to forget her.
Posted by: Jake at February 19, 2005 06:02 PM (r/5D/)
3
Hasn't anyone told Britney that alcohol is sugar? Well, it's nicely tanned blubber..
Posted by: JD at February 20, 2005 08:52 AM (J+Gcr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 11, 2005
Valentine's Day Poetry Contest At ASV
Hey poetry contest lovers, Michele is having
a V-Day poetry contest. It must follow the "roses are red..." format, and must be addressed from one famous person to another. Sounds like fun.
i'm formulating an entry in my head right now. Hmmm.
Update: Okay, here's mine:
Brittany Spears to Kevin Federline:
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Stop fucking around
And help me feed Lacy Loo*
Kevin Federline back to Brittany Spears:
Roses are red
and sometimes they're yellow
I started cheating on you
'Cuz your feet stink like hello
(I mean, they really smello)**
_______________
* Lacy Loo reference explained here.
** stink reference explained here.
Posted by: annika at
12:59 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't habitually speak this way of women, but
what a dumb, trailer trash whore. And she's not looking too good these days, either. (Well, that is, not as good as she looked a year or two ago.) See
here,
here, and
here.
Posted by: Matt at February 11, 2005 05:18 PM (TLYaI)
2
Roses are red,
Violets are blue;
I shouldn't have kissed you
When you had the flu.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 11, 2005 05:56 PM (e6fDY)
3
Um. You know. 'Cause I'm sure there's a celebrity out there who got sick recently.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 11, 2005 05:57 PM (e6fDY)
Posted by: annika at February 11, 2005 06:07 PM (QPZrJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 08, 2005
The Oldest Trick In The Plaintiff's Book
Brittany Spears
is suing her insurance companies after they refused to pay her multi-million dollar claim.
Britney Spears has filed a $9.8 million lawsuit in New York to cover the losses for her canceled Onyx Hotel Tour.
Spears called off the 2004 tour after suffering a knee injury, but several insurers refused to make up the amount she lost because on the insurance applications, Spears checked 'no' to the question of pre-existing injuries, Celebrity Justice reports.
Spears had undergone minor knee surgery [on the same knee] five years before she signed the applications. She claims she simply forgot about the surgery because it was so long ago and she had fully recovered.
Now the lesson here is, don't lie on your insurance application. It's the oldest trick in the plaintiff's book: hide your pre-existing injuries. Usually it's done after the claim is made, but in Brittany's case, she did it on the application.
What's wrong with that? Well from a theoretical standpoint, it's borderline fraudulent. She offered to enter into a contract with the insurance company without disclosing information that would be directly relevant to the amount of premium they would agree to charge her. In other words, she was arguably ripping off her insurance companies.
People do this all the time. When i worked on auto cases for insurance company clients, the most common scenario was the person who lied about thier address to get a better rate. Other people lie about the length of their commute. Sometimes, after making a claim, they'd lie about who was actually driving the car, or whether a relative lived in the same house, in order to get around an exclusion in the contract.
When you're talking 9.8 mil, i can understand why the insurance company would use any defense they can find to get out of paying on the claim. Of course, that's what insurance companies do best anyways: weasel out of paying claims. It's all a part of the game.
Posted by: annika at
01:42 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 338 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'll remember that. So what's the BEST way to commit insurance fraud?
Posted by: Casca at February 08, 2005 04:34 PM (cdv3B)
2
I work in property claims and the fraud is incredible. Some losses never happened, on others people figure they'll pad their claim a bit to get their premiums back.
Posted by: The Angle of Repose at February 08, 2005 07:20 PM (S1tOs)
3
Is it just me or does Britney become even more white trash with each passing day?
Posted by: Micah at February 09, 2005 06:56 AM (v/oTo)
4
Annika, you're so smart.
Jason H.
Austin, Texas
Posted by: Jason H. at February 09, 2005 07:21 AM (0pVR8)
5
She must be new at this. Insurance companies don't like to pay claims. They are selling "peace of mind". Make a claim; get a cancellation notice.
In this instance, a relevant omission is a pretty strong defense to paying the claim. Most likely she'll get her premiums back, which is more than she deserves.
Posted by: shelly at February 10, 2005 06:24 AM (6krEN)
6
YEah, I'm sure that in her warped perception of the world, the laws governing fraud don't apply to her. She's an idiot.
(Psst...Hey Annika, nice to meet you...the Maximum Leader speaks highly of you. In addition, I hear you are a law student as well. My condolences;-)
Posted by: Sadie at February 10, 2005 11:57 PM (4CLu3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 12, 2005
Wednesday Is Poetry Day
Here's something a little lighter, for this week. Plus it'll fit within two of my rubrics.
A quick google search revealed that Brittany Spears, besides being a fascinating singer/actress/entertainer/essayist/dancer/amateur physicist/skank, is also a poet. Brittany apparently contacted the proprietors of Tastes Like Chicken, and they agreed to publish some of her very own poetry. Here's a sample:
MOMMY, CAN YOU READ ME A BOOK?
Mommy, will you please read me this book?
It made no sense to me when I gave it a look
It's confusing and weird and it is very scary
I can't make out what it is saying to me... ah, Barry
Oh. I was trying to read a book of stamps.
Never mind.
That's beautiful. i think it, like, really gives us an insight into the close relationship between Brittany and her mom.
Go here to read some even better poems by Brittany.
Posted by: annika at
12:40 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 155 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There once was a hosehead named Spears,
Who studied Seuss, Rod McKuen, & King Lear,
Her quarter hour done
Before it'd even begun,
Now she opens for Carrot Top at Frontiers
Posted by: jeff at January 12, 2005 03:15 PM (J7J8H)
2
Opening for Carrot-Top, one couldn't get any lower than that. Unless one opened for Pauly Shore, i guess.
Posted by: annika at January 12, 2005 04:01 PM (zAOEU)
3
Many,
many years ago, I flipped thru a book of gawd-awful poetry in a book store:
Touch Me by Suzanne Somers. It's like comparing crap to shit, but I'd have to say Brittney's are a bit bitter. But 20+ years of trauma might have something to do with that.
Posted by: Victor and his seventeen pet rats at January 13, 2005 06:33 AM (L3qPK)
4
A coquettish young harlot named Spears
wrote out her dreams and her fears
though it isn't quite verse,
what is clearly far worse
is that the memory will linger for years....
Posted by: Hugo at January 13, 2005 09:43 AM (VqTF3)
5
She fancied herself a new Bard;
I say, it is not in the cards!
The young skank called Brit
Has curiously changing tits,
And viagra won't get her husband hard!
Posted by: Victor at January 13, 2005 10:59 AM (L3qPK)
6
HereÂ’s a really weird site that youÂ’ll want to link to your website: www.captainozone.com
This site features a video documentary about Captain Ozone, who traveled backwards in time on a toilet from the year 2039. He has a futuristic tattoo on his arm that visually changes when he drinks StoliÂ’s vodka.
Captain Ozone is also renowned for being the most radical environmental activist in America. In this video documentary, watch as Captain Ozone:
• recycles used toilets into fine works of art (see The Toilet Museum http://toiletmuseum.com/news.html)
• demonstrates hemp oil as an alternative lubricant to petroleum
• touts the benefits of pollution-free hydrogen fuel
• teaches school kids how to promote ecological awareness on television
• crusades for the conservation of endangered salmon
• stars in a music video about industrial pollution
There is also an intriguing interview with Captain Ozone at www.captainozone.com
Thank you,
Michael Schutte
Exc. Director
Environmental Media Northwest
Posted by: Environmental Media Northwest at February 14, 2005 01:20 AM (OA/9g)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
December 13, 2004
Skankwoman Update
This skankwoman update is so skanky, i'm glad
Kin posted it and not me.
Posted by: annika at
09:05 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Kin at December 13, 2004 09:22 PM (p8Fiv)
2
You can take the hillbilly twat out of the county, but... WTF is she doing on a commercial flight? Please tell me that it was Southwest?
Posted by: Casca at December 13, 2004 10:43 PM (cdv3B)
Posted by: ginger at December 14, 2004 02:09 PM (Otp/6)
4
On the way to work this morning, the local radio guys were talking about her, and mentioned that her and her hubby took their dog into a posh restaruant in Las Vegas (not sure about Nevada, but that's against the law here in Texas, unless that dog is a service dog), and then proceded to buy the pooch a $180 steak.
That stinks more than her feet possible ever could. Perhaps you might have a little bit too much, dear Brittany, if you're feeding your little doggy $180 steak.
Posted by: Robbie at December 14, 2004 02:17 PM (AAqv2)
5
annika, you're really angry you didn't find that first, aren't you?
Posted by: Victor at December 15, 2004 04:43 AM (L3qPK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 05, 2004
i Can't Wait To See This One
Brittany is busy
writing a letter to her fans.
[Spears] has worked so hard on her letter that she says, she 'feels like I'm at Harvard.'
i can't wait to see
which of the 26 she will pick.
Posted by: annika at
10:29 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
1
She's just following the Madonna career path, as viewed through her inbred redneck roots.
Posted by: Casca at October 05, 2004 04:17 PM (Y671w)
2
Madonna doesn't have redneck roots, but I guess you could consider her inbred with this funky combination........Her father is Italian, her mother was French-Canadian.
What was he thinking?
Posted by: reagan80 at October 05, 2004 07:02 PM (hlMFQ)
3
Casca, calling someone from Kenner a redneck would be worn as a badge of pride. Britney, OTOH, is white trash. The two can overlap, but they're not the same thing.
Posted by: Dave J at October 05, 2004 07:36 PM (GEMsk)
4
Oy vey. Too funny, Annika!
Posted by: Margi at October 06, 2004 02:28 PM (MAdsZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 23, 2004
Pimpin' For 300K
Brittany's not actually married, according to
this NY Post article, which also contains details of her pre-nuptial agreement.
Spears' rep, Leslie Sloane Zelnick, who had thought the singer was officially married, told The Post:
'Her marriage is not technically legal. But as far as Britney and Kevin [Federline's] union is concerned, it is a marriage and they are married. The papers were filed, but because the wedding date was switched so quickly, they didn't come through, and the marriage hasn't become legal yet.'
Another source said when — and if — the papers do come through, Britney will not stage another white-dress wedding when she's officially and legally married next month.
Assuming they're still together, i would add.
Us Weekly said Spears' prenup caused the 'technical' delay, as Federline was 'unhappy with how much he stood to gain if the marriage dissolved.'
The prenup gives Federline only '$300,000 a year for exactly half the tenure of their marriage' — a pittance, considering Spears' $32 million bank account.
A pittance? Hell, for 300 grr, i'd marry the bitch.
This is the most deplorable clause, though:
'Britney shall have no financial obligation to contribute to the support of [Federline's] two children.'
She's got all that money, she stole the dad from those two innocent kids and their mother, and she won't even cough up a little child support?
American Skankwoman, is right.
Via Wind Rider.
Posted by: annika at
11:14 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 231 words, total size 2 kb.
1
This is the most deplorable clause, though:
"'Britney shall have no financial obligation to contribute to the support of [Federline's] two children.'
She's got all that money, she stole the dad from those two innocent kids and their mother, and she won't even cough up a little child support?
American Skankwoman, is right."
Man, you are on the money here! There's just some things you do. There's just some things that are right.
Britney's actions reveal her objective: Instant gratification from a short fun marriage with a guy she thinks is hot; and her lack of values: Zero consideration for anyone else-- not even a now abandoned mother-- not even two children! Britney is a lost soul behaving like a pure c***. She is a sickening car wreck one cannot turn away from.
Posted by: gcotharn at September 23, 2004 11:44 AM (Pbs6a)
2
Normally, annika, I agree with your anti-Britney screeds, but I have to disagree with you on a few points here.
First, she didn't "steal" anyone. Saying that he was "stolen" places the blame on Britney and absolves Kevin. Kevin left the mother of his children of his own volition. No one forced him at gun-point to do so. The responsibility for his choice and his children is primarily his. If Britney started seeing him while he was married (I don't know the actual details so I can't honestly say) then she
is guilty of participating in adultery, but the primary responsibility is still his and his alone.
Second, I think that you are completely wrong about the clause that you declare to be "deplorable." This is a pre-nup. As I understand the nature of pre-nuptual agreements, it applies only at such time as the marriage dissolves. This is not saying that she
won't help him with the children while they are together. It isn't even saying that she
won't help him with his children should they get a divorce. It simply states that she is not
legally responsible for them in the event of a divorce. There is a world of difference between the two. My belief, having parents who divorced when I was young and who both later remarried, is that the step-parent
does have responsibilites to the step-children during the marriage, and it would be deplorable for Britney to not live up to those responsibilities. An attempt to make her legally responsible for those children for the rest of her life if it turns out that he is only marrying her for her money would be equally deplorable.
Posted by: Jerry at September 23, 2004 12:14 PM (C34kV)
3
Jerry,
This is a question of class and taste and principles and values. Britney Spears has millions of men willing to make fools of themselves in her service. She does not need to grandly swoop in on someone else's fledgling relationship- especially when kids are involved.
And I don't want to hear "the fledgling relationship was struggling." EVERY SINGLE TIME someone wants to stray in a relationship, they justify it by saying the "relationship is struggling." "The relationship is struggling" is not an excuse for extracurricular play-around.
Secondly, when you're worth tens of millions of dollars, and you've just swooped in on some idiot, and encouraged him to ditch the mother of his children, you set up a little trust fund to take care of the children. Its just the right thing to do.
Britney gives away more than that in tip money. She spends more than that on salt rubs. Heck, she could cut down on charity donations for one year and set up a trust fund- I don't care- but she could stand to show the teensiest bit of class.
You're not thinking about the millions of guys Britney could choose from, or the tens of millions of dollars she controls. Heck with legalities. She could legally protect herself and still show a bit of class. Some things are just the right things to do.
Posted by: gcotharn at September 23, 2004 02:58 PM (Pbs6a)
4
GC: I will not say that "the fledgling relationship was struggling" because, as my comments clearly indicate, I do not know the details of the relationship between Federline and his ex. You are wrong, however, in your assertion that "is a question of class and taste and principles and values." It is none of those things. It is a question of a pre-nuptual agreement. The main purpose of a pre-nup is to protect the material assets of each member of a marriage in the event of a divorce. As I pointed out very clearly in my comments, I agree that Britney has responsibilities to the children of her husband. Fulfilling those responsibilities will be the classy, tasteful, principled, values-based thing to do. None of this has any bearing on her
legal responsibilities. Nothing in the pre-nup (based, of course, on the limited portionsof it quoted in the article) prevent her from doing any of the things that you suggested. Nothing in the article states or even
implies that she won't. You are making brazen assumptions by implying that she will do nothing for those children.
As to the question of Britney "swooping" in on Federline, I also clearly stated in my comments that she is likely guilty of participating in adultry and that this is immoral. The key issue, which you fail to even
mention in your rebuttal, is that federline could have simply said "no." He has free will and the right to exercise it. The
primary responsibility for the situation that his children are now in his his. He doesn't get absolved of all wrongdoing just because Britney has "has millions of men" and "tens of millions of dollars" at her disposal.
Posted by: Jerry at September 23, 2004 07:34 PM (97+nP)
5
Of COURSE the idiot dancer is responsible and culpable(I've got NOTHING against dancers. But I have seen photos of THIS dancer, and he is an idiot.) I don't care about the idiot. I can't believe I'm even writing another comment about the skank!
Pretend you are Britney Spears. Would you use your fame and your millions to swoop in on this idiot, his children, and their mother? No. No. A thousand times no. You, Jerry/Britney, seem like a decent and sensible person. You would couple with another of your many admirers, and hope that the idiot could somehow find it within himself to forthrightly straighten out or get out of his relationship. Long odds, that.
You would heed a more civilized code than Skankwoman, because you have more class, more sense, and more decency.
Its true that skankwoman may quietly take care of the kids. However, nothing about her gives me confidence in that happening. I saw her using the one girl as a prop in a People Magazine cover. It turned my stomach.
Posted by: gcotharn at September 23, 2004 09:21 PM (Pbs6a)
6
GC: Then my original comment stands:
1) Federline is responsible for his own actions, not Britney, although she does have to take responsibility for her own bad behavior.
2) The "deplorable" clause in the pre-nup merely offers Britney a reasonable level of legal protection in the event that Federline is simply using her for her money and it does not, in any way, prevent her from meeting the responsibilities that she has to the family of her husband and nothing in the article either states or implies that she won't meet those responsibilities.
Posted by: Jerry at September 24, 2004 06:22 AM (C34kV)
7
annika's journal:
we editorialize, you decide.
Posted by: annika at September 24, 2004 09:53 AM (zAOEU)
8
[rant] OK, a quick rundown.
1) Federline is the "baby daddy" to these two kids. He never married their mother.
2) Federline started f***ing Skankwoman while Shar Jackson was pregnant with his child.
3) Skankwoman started f***ing Federline while another woman was pregnant with his child.
4) Shar Jackson let herself get knocked up twice by a man to whom she wasn't married.
5) Shar Jackson apparently also has two children by at least one father other than Federline.
6) I can find no evidence that Jackson has
ever been married.
So, what does all this tell us:
(a) Federline is a degenerate scumbag who knocks up women not his wife, doesn't marry them, and will stick his d*** in any available slut at any time -- including when another woman, already the mother of one of his children, is bearing his child.
(b) Shar Jackson is at best guilty of very bad judgment, and at worst a stupid whore.
(c) Skankwoman is a cheap, amoral slut, and stupid enough to marry a known philanderer.
These people deserve each other. Federline deserves to have his $300K/year shoved up his a** a penny at a time. Hopefully, en route to that happy denouement he will (1) knock up Skankwoman; (2) f*** some nasty whore behind Skankwoman's back; (3) bring home an incurable (non-fatal), sexually transmitted disease -- herpes would be good -- and transmit it to Skankwoman; and (4) have his d*** shrivel up and fall off immediately after he infects Skankwoman. Skankwoman deserves to be impregnated, cheated on, infected, and divorced, and to have her career go down the sh**ter as well. Shar Jackson deserves to be cheated on by virtue of repeatedly displaying piss-poor judgment.
The only innocent parties here are Jackson's kids. But I see no reason Spears should pay for them. Their idiot/whore mother and degenerate father chose to bring those kids into this world, and they should have to support them. In fact, I'd be much happier if both natural parents had to work themselves into early graves doing backbreaking work on a daily basis in order to support the results of their stupidity/irresponsibility. They shouldn't be able to pass the responsibility off on Daddy's wife, even if she is a dirty slut.
[/rant]
Posted by: Matt at September 24, 2004 09:13 PM (eWM9Y)
9
Annie:
Doncha think we've all wasted enough time on this person?
Let's follow the Michael Jackson saga...at least justice should be coming to him a little more swiftly.
Posted by: shelly s. at September 25, 2004 01:00 AM (s6c4t)
10
I'm so weak. I swore I would lay off this comment thread, yet I'm coming back to it like an addict. I hate myself. But gimme the crackpipe.
Imagine Federline is en flagrante delecto with Jackson. Skankwoman saunters in au natural, and purrs for Federline to come across the room and delecto a bit with a blond temptress. Federline, in the process of disengagement and redeployment, knocks two beautiful vases to the ground- shattering both into many pieces.
Now, Federline knocked over and shattered those vases. Its HIS responsibility. It IS NOT Skankwoman's fault. It IS NOT her responsibility. But, the classy thing, the decent thing, is for Skankwoman to grab an extra broom and help sweep up the mess.
I'm not advocating that Skankwoman show moral responsibility. I'm advocating that Skankwoman show some common decency.
Since prenups have been instituted into this situation, its disingenious to say "This should be covered by prenup, but this other should not be covered by prenup." If you're going to bring prenup into the picture, go all the way.
Skankwoman has a legal case that she's not responsible for the kids. If she was a waitress at Chile's, I would absolutely say she has a moral case that she's not responsible for the kids. But she's not a waitress at Chile's. When fortune smiles, the classy thing is to share a bit of your good fortune with others. To not do so is bad juju, bad karma, and just an all around lack of class.
As soon as I sober up, I will never touch this intoxicating subject again. I swear.
Posted by: gcotharn at September 25, 2004 12:54 PM (AaBEz)
11
To all that's been said, I'd also add that anything in a prenuptial agreement relating to child support is likely to be held by a court to be unenforceable. Just as with custody, courts typically use the "best interests of the child" standard, and I'd expect there are plenty of statutes to govern this that would trump the prenup regardless.
Posted by: Dave J at September 29, 2004 10:37 AM (VThvo)
12
britney doesn't have to pay child support for the asshole's kids. it's the asshole's responsibility to pay child support. they are the jerk's kids, not hers. and britney didn't steal anyone, it was that fuckin' bastard who started dating her. kevin is so cheeky. he says the cash he will receive in case he and brit split is too little. he doesn't deserve even a penny.
Posted by: alazobbi at August 06, 2005 02:59 PM (aKIoq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 20, 2004
Curious
Hey, she can have sex now!
Oh that's right, she already has.
Posted by: annika at
06:25 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 14 words, total size 1 kb.
1
We should start a pool on how long this thing is gonna last.
Posted by: Amy at September 20, 2004 08:03 AM (RpVKX)
2
Time to start a pool. These are my bets:
First public spat: Election Week~ Nov. 2
First rumors of new husband's infidelity appearing in People Magazine: Jan. 20
Britney files for divorce: Feb 18
Britney does the traditional girl thing-- dump them after Valentines Day!
Here's how I know I'm on the right track-- can't decide if my predictions are too cynical or too optimistic...
Posted by: gcotharn at September 20, 2004 08:47 AM (AaBEz)
3
The "traditional girl thing?"
i won't ask.
Posted by: annika! at September 20, 2004 10:45 AM (zAOEU)
4
Well, since the traditional girl thing, when immediately followed by, "I won't ask," really means, "Tell me what that means if you ever want a day of peace for the rest of your life," I'll tell you what it means:
1. Boy figures out girl is ready to dump him.
2. Boy, simply because he doesn't like to lose at anything, plans big romantic expensive Valentine's Day thing that will surely guarantee he keeps her until that day he decides he's sick of her.
3. Girl, in the meantime, has been dropping hints she'll drop him, knowing boy will plan big romantic expensive Valentine's Day thing to try to guarantee he keeps her until that day he decides he's sick of her.
4. Boy spends a boatload of bucks on a rented limo, flowers, candy, dinner, wine, and theater tickets on Valentine's Day.
5. Girl order's sixteen lobsters and seven bottles of champagne at dinner, then dumps boy during intermission of play/musical/opera.
6. Boy leaves girl at theater, but she's already made arrangements to be picked up by a girlfriend after the show so she can show her girlfriend the pictures of the guy's face when his plan fell flat. Pictures show up on internet faster than a Britney Spears divorce.
No, that's never happened to me, but I know two girls who've done similar things (I admit, one of the guys deserved it. Don't know the other guy, so I can't really say.).
Posted by: Victor at September 20, 2004 11:38 AM (L3qPK)
5
The spread between Christmas and V-day is the professional single guy's annual holiday... Only uncommitted, purely physical, stay in shape, sportfucking allowed. Amateurs, and the soon to be legally fucked, date during this traditional armistice of the sexes.
Posted by: Casca at September 20, 2004 06:59 PM (Y671w)
6
I knew that "traditional girl thing" would get some comments!
I agree with Casca. I should stipulate that I'm talking about college students and early to mid 20's people, and I'm quite past that age. When I was that age, over Thanksgiving I would decide if I really wanted to stay in whatever relationship I was in, because it would mean Christmas gift AND probable Valentine's Hell. Per Casca, and lacking serious zhu-zhu for the girl, the smart play was to ditch her- really before Thanksgiving- which means you didn't have to put up with any of those cloying "I miss you so much" calls from your family's house while she was at her family's house. Every man with any sense thinks this way.
I honestly can't remember this happening to me, but I've always thought girls would hang in there and ditch the guy soon after Valentine's Hell. That way she gets flowers sent to her office so she can show off in front of her girlfriends. And those flowers damn well better arrive before 10AM. I've sent flowers that arrived late afternoon, and I caught hell for it. That was a girl I thought I had a future with, and that incident was a factor in ditching her.
Anyway, why would a girl ditch BEFORE Valentines? Valentines is "be a princess" day! Flowers, chocolate, champagne, good food, big production sex... hell, almost makes me want to put on a lacy thingy and let the guy do me!
Almost.
If I'm wrong about all this, you can let me know. But, as a general, loose rule, I've always thought there was a lot of this stuff going on- on both sides.
Posted by: gcotharn at September 20, 2004 09:46 PM (Pbs6a)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 03, 2004
Double Your Pleasure, Double Your Fun
With Brittany, Brittany, Spears-mint Gum!
What could possibly bump up the value of some pieces to the $14,000 range?
Maybe some chunks have a higher amount of tobacco residue than the other pieces? Or a higher percentage of cum content, measured in parts per billion?
Posted by: annika at
10:52 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Cum content? Wow, it really is Friday.
Posted by: DBrooks at September 03, 2004 05:27 PM (3J0hl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 15, 2004
i Have Nothing To Add To This One
"Britney was my sex-mad bride": Jason Alexander tells all.
Link thanks to Jennifer, who seems to always find this stuff before me. ; )
Posted by: annika at
08:40 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Damn girl. I thought you would have been up on that...in the future, do what I do, read the silly fan site World of Britney (http://www.worldofbritney.com/) for your updated news. Also check in with Stereogum (http://www.stereogum.com/) from time to time, he always seems to have the real trashy pictures of the skankwoman.
Posted by: ginger at July 15, 2004 09:48 AM (BgaW7)
2
"up on that?" LOL, interesting choice of words when talking about the Skankwoman!
Posted by: annika! at July 15, 2004 10:16 AM (zAOEU)
Posted by: candace at July 15, 2004 12:56 PM (hZHYA)
4
Man. I actually feel kinda sorry for the guy...
Posted by: Amy at July 15, 2004 02:37 PM (RpVKX)
5
golly gee whiz. She's so totally not that innocent.
Posted by: Dawn Summers at July 16, 2004 10:14 AM (HLOeu)
6
Up for the
Question of the Day? I promise it is totally skanktafied.
Just don't try it right after lunch.
Posted by: Rick at July 18, 2004 07:37 PM (UvLHg)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 30, 2004
Is She Or Isn't She?
A skanky homewrecking no-talent ho? The answer is yes.
But is she pregnant? She says no.
Okay, so commenter Rick chided me for not mentioning the rumor that Brittany is pregnant. Actually, not being as diligent lately as is my usual wont, i didn't know about the rumor until reading Rick's comment.
Here's the story.
Pop star Britney's shock engagement may reportedly be because the singer is pregnant. . . . [T]he News of the World says Britney is expecting a child at Christmas and so wants to be married to him by November.
. . .
The driving force behind the marriage is the singer's mother, Lynne, who doesn't want her to have a baby out of wedlock.
A Britney insider told the paper: 'Her mum has taken control now.'
However, in a People Magazine interview,
Brittany denied the rumor. Also, she revealed that she proposed to the dancer-guy first.
They got talking on the plane about this and that and suddenly she proposed to him. And he said no. Now, this all is in a span of a couple of minutes. Then he turned around and asked her and she said yes.
Never mind the fact that dancer-dude has a two year old with another woman, who happens to be pregnant with his second child.
Pop icon and fine upstanding role model: Brittany Spears.
Anyways, here's another rumor that i hope turns out to be true:
Pop beauty Britney Spears has decided to give up her singing career to become a full-time housewife, according to her pals.
Keeping my fingers crossed on that one.
Posted by: annika at
08:18 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 270 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Oh dear God, I HOPE NOT (the housewife thing) -- I would immediately sense a newlywed-and-maybe-expectant-mom-type-reality-show where Britney doesn't know how to take out the garbage or do her laundry.
It worked in making Jessica Simpson appear "aww, i'm so stupid i'm cute" and I think the last thing we all need is another reason to see Britney's face all over the TV screen.
Wait. Maybe I take that back. I think I would love to witness the baby-mama-drama that's going to unfold with Shar Jackson (the mother of Britney's fiance's kids).
Posted by: Amy at June 30, 2004 10:15 AM (RpVKX)
2
Have you seen this, Annika?
Posted by: Hugo at July 12, 2004 04:15 PM (ntfdi)
3
I meant to put this up:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,5-2004313023,00.html
Posted by: Hugo at July 12, 2004 04:18 PM (ntfdi)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 28, 2004
Hooray!
i've been posting lightly lately, but i don't want to miss the chance to acknowledge the two amazing events that happened recently, neither of which, some critics say, have a snowball's chance in hell of lasting.
Iraq is a sovereign and independent nation . . .
. . . and . . .
. . . Brittany got engaged!
So congratulations to all 25,374,691 Iraqi citizens and to Brittany Spears. i wish all of you guys the best of luck. Who can say what the future holds for you? But i know, if you work hard, persevere and stay true to what is right, with a little bit of luck i'm sure that you all will create a lasting and successful modernized union that will become the envy of all countries throughout the troubled Middle East region, or of skanky homewrecking no-talent ho's, whichever the case may be.
Posted by: annika at
05:39 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
98kb generated in CPU 0.0331, elapsed 0.0924 seconds.
78 queries taking 0.0735 seconds, 282 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.