just trying to eat my waffles

January 31, 2008

List Of Reasons Why We Conservatives Need To Suck It Up And Get Behind McCain

Posted by: annika at 08:27 AM | Comments (25) | Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Looks about right.

Posted by: Casca at January 31, 2008 08:29 AM (xGZ+b)

2 Actually, your list is longer than mine.

Posted by: physics geek at January 31, 2008 09:51 AM (MT22W)

3 Skippy actually made a list.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 31, 2008 02:27 PM (USKv3)

4 Well put oh wise one. Why are Republicans (except for Thompson who apparently had all the enthusiasm for office of a tranquilized Dick Chenney, and Paul who's isolationism is too much) afraid of the conservative message? (And more importantly policy) The media feigns McCain love, and has sold him to alot of folks. It's largely a ruse and the affair will sour if he is nominated.

Posted by: Mike C. at January 31, 2008 06:11 PM (d/RyS)

5 Simple; McCain can beat Hillary. McCain is the Anti-Hillary; HIllary is the Anti-Christ.

Posted by: shelly at February 01, 2008 03:27 AM (wearR)

6 I think Shelly has it.

Posted by: annika at February 01, 2008 07:28 AM (xfjC+)

7 I will vote for McCain if he is the nominee. Until then... well I'll vote for the best candidate.

Posted by: Chuck at February 01, 2008 07:53 AM (FoYPf)

8 McCain won't beat Rodham. He's their dream opponent. As soon as he becomes the candidate the media will jilt him like the sawed-off runt he is, and everyone will hear the stories that many of us already know. You do know about how he dumped his paraplegic ex-wife?

Posted by: Casca at February 01, 2008 10:05 AM (IrbU4)

9 You know, I don't like McCain's business stance, I don't like a whole lot of other things about him, but if the choice is between him and Hillary, or him and the Second-coming-of-the-empty-suit (i.e. Obama), then my vote's for McCain, and to hell with his conservative "impurity". I'd rather have the impurity in the White House than the Hills or the Empty Suit.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at February 01, 2008 03:19 PM (xHyDY)

10 Nah, better to change the minds of a generation with another helping of Clintonian lying, than get the same results from a faux Republican. Hillary would be a one termer, and she'd unite conservatives behind another Reagan, just like Jimmuh did. McCain will destroy the party, and could keep us from retaking the congress for another thirty years.

Posted by: Casca at February 01, 2008 03:57 PM (MQ9LJ)

11 Yeah, and Hils'll f-up health care, screw up both Iraq and Afghanistan, and unless she listens to Bill, bork the economy through Kyoto and all sorts of other Leftisms her party'll want to implement by dint of owning both Congress and the house. Not to mention that if the US goes abroad again, we won't go in force like we did for Iraq I or this latest incarnation. We'll go like we did in Somalia: In force at first, then petered out at the end. And we won't finish what we start. I really don't want to relive the Clintonian version of Use-of-Force again. Look, Cas, I know what you're sayin', but I really don't think letting things go to pot is the answer. History shows that countries that allow their leadership to lead them to ruin tend not to recover afterwards. Rock bottom is not something to rebound off of.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at February 01, 2008 04:15 PM (xHyDY)

12 Sorry, Cas. I don't have another thirty years for sure, Hell, I may not have four. I want instant gratificatio, and I donot want to suffer for those four seeing her ugly face and huge butt and piano legs every damn day of my life. You probably loved boot camp. Even four years of Hillary boot camp would kill me. I'm voting for the maverick, RINO, over the sure fire Satan.

Posted by: shelly at February 02, 2008 06:46 AM (wearR)

13 McCain hasn't stabbed pro-lifers in the back. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yet.

Posted by: Mark at February 02, 2008 01:18 PM (fm7Bq)

14 Yup, I'm with Elmondo. Choose the least of the evils.

Posted by: Joules at February 02, 2008 06:00 PM (28NFV)

15 It doesn't matter if McSuck can beat Hitlery, because she is not going to be the nominee. The DNC is behind Osama Hussein and have thrown the Clintonistas out on their asses. Their time is finally through. I don't think McSuck can beat Hussein or Hitlery because too big a percentage of the conservative base will sit it out. No matter what happens, we'll be well on the road to MexAmeriCanada and enjoying the kind of socialized medicine that will bankrupt the country in less than a decade. Well done, ignorant voting masses!

Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at February 03, 2008 07:49 AM (b6+qN)

16 Hey, you forget this reason .

Posted by: S.H. Long at February 03, 2008 08:36 AM (AGm8o)

17 Preston, how can you be so wrong, and yet so right? Well actually you're only wrong about one thing. Bronco Bomber won't be the nominee. The rest is spot on. I'll be happy to take your money if you care to wager. As for all of you good Germans preparing to join the Wehrmacht, it won't matter. McCain won't win after the media turns on him, and pulls his pants down in public. The real question is, can Hillary motivate conservatives to vote for McCain? Come October, McCain's negatives will be as high as Hillary's. Can you say, "Keating Five"?

Posted by: Casca at February 03, 2008 10:20 AM (MQ9LJ)

18 Casca's right; Bronco's toast. The Clintons boujght the best time and the best organizers long ago. On Tuesday it will roll over him. We need to pick up the disenchanted and convert them to Romney.

Posted by: Shelly at February 03, 2008 03:22 PM (wearR)

19 Oh, I was proven wrong just about every weekend during football season last fall. And I was wrong about the 2004 election. So it wouldn't be the first time. The only thing worse than me having to vote for Romney in early voting a couple of days ago is the visual of McCain with his pants around his ankles. I may wretch.

Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at February 03, 2008 06:32 PM (b6+qN)

20 Let's speak plainly: if whites are a minority and Mexicans become a majority, then we can kiss away our Anglo-American traditions of freedom, limited government, and all the rest. This is the stakes: whether we stay in tact as a people or a new people is "elected" by Washington through social engineering immigration policies. That's why it's probably even preferable a conservative unifying figure like Hillary or Obama is elected and shot down on immigration than if McCain comes into power. His amnesty plan would be a huge disaster, and his lies in defending it only show what a bad dishonest president he would be.

Posted by: Roach at February 04, 2008 01:04 PM (kKFU6)

21 A friend commented to us yesterday that this election will tell us who America hates the least among blacks, women, Mormons and crippled old men.

Posted by: Joules at February 04, 2008 04:18 PM (28NFV)

22 Rodger weighs in: http://curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.com/2008/02/silk-purse.html

Posted by: Casca at February 05, 2008 08:05 AM (FzhYM)

23 it gratifies me to see so many have adopted the moniker I coined: Bronco Bomber.

Posted by: annika at February 05, 2008 01:33 PM (zAOEU)

24 plus, S.H. Long wins the prize for getting my joke.

Posted by: annika at February 05, 2008 01:34 PM (zAOEU)

25 Actually, I thought the 2 periods in Annie's post were a graphical representation of the size of Obama and Hillary's testicles as compared to McCain's.

Posted by: reagan80 at February 05, 2008 03:01 PM (USKv3)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 10, 2008

And Then There Was Fred!

Am I the only one who thinks that Fred won tonight's Fox debate, by a mile? He picks now to sack up? What the hell?

Posted by: annika at 07:51 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Why wouldn't he? He's a movie star. Plus, he's probably the class of the field. Fuck, I didn't get to watch it.

Posted by: Casca at January 10, 2008 08:11 PM (MQ9LJ)

2 Better now than never.

Posted by: Otto at January 10, 2008 10:12 PM (7hzEq)

3 Oh, good! You're posting a little bit more. I've visited The American Scene and The Postmodern Conservative regularly. TAS is a great blog but I'm about 50 IQ points below those guys. Here, I'm probably about 25 below so it feels a little more comfortable. ;-) I keep thinking how lame it is that Hillary said she finally found her voice. After all these years? That inspires a lot of confidence.

Posted by: Joules at January 11, 2008 08:04 PM (28NFV)

4 Don't kid yourself Joules. It's a lot more than 25. That faggot from NYC doesn't post here anymore.

Posted by: Casca at January 11, 2008 10:39 PM (MQ9LJ)

5 But, that guy could return and he most likely will. One of the few good things that came from the "retirement" of Annika's Journal was not having to see his name again in the comments.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 12, 2008 08:40 AM (f3Oy4)

6 I tried to pick a number that would leave me with a little dignity but you saw through that immediately. It's highly likely the person in question _will_ return so just find a way to prepare yourselves. Yoga, drugs, journaling...oh, who am I kidding?

Posted by: Joules at January 12, 2008 09:17 AM (28NFV)

7 "Don't kid yourself Joules. It's a lot more than 25." So, Cas, if you weren't here, what'd it be? A lot more than 75??

(*Smirks, runs away...*)

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 14, 2008 12:56 PM (xHyDY)

8 Why run? You'll just die tired.

Posted by: Casca at January 14, 2008 10:10 PM (MQ9LJ)

9 Have I mentioned that the best team in America did not play on January 7? (Sorry Cas, I just can't control myself sometimes) That will again be proven on September 13. Pete will be ready, will Jim?

Posted by: shelly at January 15, 2008 03:42 AM (wearR)

10 Your shit will be in the street!

Posted by: Casca at January 15, 2008 10:26 PM (MQ9LJ)

11 Wait, you are talking about those homos who lost to Stanford, right?

Posted by: Casca at January 15, 2008 10:28 PM (MQ9LJ)

12 YES, I am the on who called for armed insurrection against this illegitimate never elected fascist vermin government! I am the one who called for a coup within the military, to save our nation and IT HAS HAPPENED ! The CIA NIE (IRAN HAS NO BOMB) is a coup! The plan by BushCo and the neocons was to sacrifice the entire Fifth fleet (10,000 + sailors) to stir America into tolerating and demading a "nukular" response on Iran and kill all the brown people. What we have here is a coup against the neocons, the zionists and BushCheneyHalliburton! When Bush raises the ante we will take to the streets with weapons!

Posted by: KayInMaine at January 22, 2008 12:08 PM (csq2r)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 08, 2008

Post New Hampshire General Commentary Post #3

Okay so I'm resurfacing because I just can't keep silent on what happened tonight.

Keep in mind that I don't even want Obama to win, but I hate Hillary. I didn't realize that I hated her until tonight. Before I just disliked her and didn't want her to be president. Now I want to stick a knitting needle in her eye.

(If I were to stick a knitting needle in her eye, here's what I think it would sound like: "pffft..." "AAAAAHHHH!!! AAAAAHHHH!!! AAAAAHHHH!!! AAAAAHHHH!!! AAAAAHHHH!!!" etc.)

Anyways. Tell me this. NobodyÂ—but nobodyÂ—predicted anything less than a five point Obama victory as late as yesterday. I'm talkin' Zogby, Rassmussen, CNN, CBS, etc. I know pre-election polls are often wrong, but the exit polling today also predicted a solid Obama victory.

Add to that, Clinton herself acted like a defeated woman for the past few days. She knew she was going to lose New Hampshire, because she was going to lose! Her crocodile tears, her meltdown at Saturday's debate, and Bill's tirade against the vast media conspiracy, all show a campaign that saw the writing on the wall.

Plus, I don't know anybody that thought Clinton's behavior since Iowa has helped her in any way. Everybody I talked to thought she was hurting herself badly every time she opened her mouth.

And all the coverage of the campaigning in NH since Thursday was all about how Clinton wasn't drawing crowds and Obama rallies were huge and energized.

All that stuff tells me that she cheated. Come on, it's the fucking CLINTONS, for pete's sake. They fucking cheated and you know it. These people don't care how they win; lying, cheating and stealing mean nothing to them. They're as Macchiavelian as anyone in modern politics. What did Bill say when Ken Starr had him by the balls? We'll just have to win then.

The Clinton machine was in a desperate spot today. They knew they had to win, but they also knew they couldn't turn things around that quickly. Electorates don't change their minds that fast. The only way they could do it was to cheat. But we'll sooner find out how Hillary made all that money in cattle futures than find out how she cheated on this election. I guarantee nobody will look into it. The media loves a horse race and they got one now.

Historians will write about how President Hillary saved herself with the spectacular New Hampshire comeback. But I'm telling you, this was the 2008 version of Daley delivering Chicago or Joe Kennedy buying West Virginia. Its the only possible explanation and it sucks.

Not that I want Obama to win. I admire him greatly, sure, but I disagree with him on almost every issue. I just want him to win the nomination. I used to think he couldn't win it, but now I think he can. I've never seen a guy generate that much passion and excitement as a politician. I want him to win because it will kill the baby boomer sixties counter-culture stranglehold on the Democratic party, hopefully for good. Then I want to see the Republicans nominate a guy who can beat him. Against Obama, at least it would be a fair fight.

Posted by: annika at 08:36 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 554 words, total size 3 kb.

1 A needle in Hillary's eye won't be enough. She requires a stake in her heart and a coat hanger jammed into her fucking urethra.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 09, 2008 03:55 AM (f3Oy4)

2 You're right, they stole the election. Just ask any Democrat--if you're winning in the polls--both pre- and exit--then you lose, the only explanation is the election was stolen from you! Obama should sue!

Posted by: Victor at January 09, 2008 06:40 AM (1oGDT)

3 Of course you are back; fish gottas swim and birds gotta fly...think about it. Well, I agree they cheated; mostly, the bussed them in by the busload. But, it was semi-legal and no one will be able to prove it. Remember, all the thieves are there helping; Carville, Begala, Daley, Burglar, Albright, trying to regain center stage. But here's how I see it; Barack is an out and out liberal, but a very clever, smart one. He would be harder to beat by whoever survives the Republican primaries, be it McCain, Romney, Huckabee (no chance) or Giuliani. If McCain maintains momentum and runs the table, I am boldly predicting that he will ask the convention to do something very non-conventional; nominate Joe Lieberman for VP. I know, it sounds so outre, but think abnout it - they beat anyone, especially Clinton/Richardson, which would appear to be the conventional wisdom of today. Anyway, that's enough for now. Welcome back Annie. I hope the law work is going well. Tell us about your new wheels and what kind of law you are practicing.

Posted by: shelly at January 09, 2008 06:53 AM (wearR)

4 I can find solace in this whole debacle in that Annika Is Back.

Posted by: jimbino at January 10, 2008 10:44 AM (czzEz)

5 What the fuck is this shit? Annie's been blogging again for almost two months AND NOBODY FUCKING TOLD ME? Fuck! And here I've been checking 6MB for anything new by Annie every few weeks. Fuckin' motherfuck!

Posted by: Matt at January 10, 2008 11:27 AM (10G2T)

6 I know how you feel, Matt. The only reason why I knew about this blog's "re-awakening" was because of an "Annika is back" entry at Skippystalin's site.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 10, 2008 02:18 PM (f3Oy4)

7 Ballot Box stuffing is a time honored Demoncrat tradition. Why do you think they own the inner cities? It's the easiest place to steal votes. Matt, you've got to quit hanging around with the company gunny.

Posted by: Casca at January 10, 2008 08:28 PM (MQ9LJ)

8 on this subject ,. alloy employees credit union australian carbon credit purchasing , this the most good site

Posted by: TibeDierneZef at January 12, 2008 09:11 PM (aZapg)

9 Hi everyone, Just passing through and wanted to say hi. Pam

Posted by: pamelakworkoutgirl at January 15, 2008 01:12 PM (kftyl)

10 Hello, annika.mu.nu I Was just surfing the net and came upon your blog annika.mu.nu IJust dropping a friendly line to say hello Anyway, keep the good posts up

that is about the cock ring Ciao sincerely, Diane My blog on

Posted by: Cruise Ship Jobs at January 18, 2008 04:35 PM (9jRxI)

11 Just look at these http://www.wowzamedia.com/forums/member.php?u=1282 http://www.wowzamedia.com/forums/member.php?u=1282

Posted by: Uritreddikers at January 23, 2008 04:49 PM (4Xfje)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Post New Hampshire McCain Win Post #2 (The Semi-Lucid One)

If Mac's back, does that mean I'm back?

Posted by: annika at 08:35 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

Post New Hampshire Obama Loss Post #1 (The Irrational One)

Fucking Clinton machine! Fuck fuck fuck them fuckers! I hate them.

Posted by: annika at 08:33 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.

44kb generated in CPU 0.0184, elapsed 0.0926 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.0809 seconds, 217 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 4850
Files: 15
Bytes: 64.8M
CPU Time: 2:26
Queries: 258106

Content

Posts: 2168
Comments: 17090

Feeds

January 31, 2008

January 10, 2008

January 08, 2008

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds