August 04, 2004
[I]t does not follow that the theology of a few should be allowed to forestall the health and well-being of the many. And how can we affirm life if we abandon those whose own lives are so desperately at risk?Moral relativism at its finest.It is a hallmark of human intelligence that we are able to make distinctions. Yes, these cells could theoretically have the potential, under very different circumstances, to develop into human beings — that potential is where their magic lies. But they are not, in and of themselves, human beings. They have no fingers and toes, no brain or spinal cord. They have no thoughts, no fears. They feel no pain. Surely we can distinguish between these undifferentiated cells multiplying in a tissue culture and a living, breathing person — parent, a spouse, a child.
But Ron, you failed to directly answer the central question. The one question that must be answered before anyone goes tinkering around in this area. The most important question of all: Is it a human life?
Posted by: annika at
09:31 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 198 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Nice Guy Eddie at August 04, 2004 01:50 PM (gNmoD)
Posted by: wegglywoo at August 04, 2004 04:48 PM (seI9v)
61 queries taking 0.1202 seconds, 159 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.