September 07, 2006
I don't blame Kiki so much. She's more of a master of ceremonies for this contemporary version of the Liars Club. Besides her poor posture and crooked mouth (which I never noticed before), she did a serviceable job. I find her manner more pleasant than Dan Rather's, but that ass surely didn't set the bar too high for his successor.
Kiki's show started with Jim Axelrod asserting quite unequivocally that the latest tape from Bin Laden contradicts the President's message in his recent War On Terror speeches. Anyone with a brain can see that just the opposite is true. In fact, the al Qaeda video features terrorists that are now in U.S. custody, whose interrogation led to the arrests of further terrorists. Bin Laden's video not only disproves beyond any doubt the stupid "inside job" conspiracy theories, but it shows how we've made a big dent in al Qaeda's leadership.
The second segment promised to show how support for the Iraq War has fallen among conservatives of the Bible Belt. They then showed only three people, two of whom said that they support the war! [Actually, the third guy supports the war too! See update, infra.] Now, I'm not trying to claim that support for the war has not fallen. It obviously has, but this joke of a news segment proved nothing of the sort. The one guy who said he was going to vote for Democrats was cut off just as he was about to state the reason why. No doubt his reasons had more to do with immigration and runaway spending, but CBS didn't want their audience to know that.
In the next segment, both Kiki and the reporter blatantly repeated the lie that Valerie Plame was an undercover agent. I guess they believe that old totalitarian principle about repeating the big lie often enough. Then followed an interview with Armitage, which nearly made me keel over with disinterest. This story is so irrelevant, why doesn't CBS just move on dot org?
That was when I turned it off, and to my dismay learned that I had missed a touchdown.
Update: The guy who said he was voting democratic in the second segment I mentioned above was retired Colonel Jim Van Riper, USMC. The unedited interview is here. I was wrong about his reasons for planning to vote Democratic. But CBS, very sneakily, omitted from their televised soundbites any of Colonel Van Riper's very strong pro-Iraq War statements. His objection is not that we're in Iraq, he just wants to win and he doesn't think the administration is getting the job done.
While I think it's misguided to think a Democratic Congress will do anything but weaken America, I can totally understand Col. Van Riper's frustration. We all want to win. Does anybody really think that Bush's poll numbers would be where they are now if we had already succeeded in Iraq? For most Americans — and this is the dirty little secret CBS and the elite media don't want you to know — the issue is victory, not whether the war was legal or right or wrong or unilateral or any of the other Michael Moore objections. If we had won already, nobody would be complaining. Wanting to win is patriotic, as is frustration that we might not be winning.
Posted by: annika at
07:06 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 647 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: will at September 07, 2006 07:11 PM (h7Ciu)
Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at September 07, 2006 07:24 PM (I1Jw8)
Posted by: Greta at September 07, 2006 07:49 PM (Cbtbf)
Posted by: Tuning Spork at September 07, 2006 08:40 PM (znU0k)
Posted by: Jake at September 07, 2006 08:49 PM (r/5D/)
Posted by: Blake at September 07, 2006 09:23 PM (1B44J)
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at September 07, 2006 11:47 PM (Wotgj)
Posted by: Casca at September 08, 2006 08:35 AM (Z2ndo)
Posted by: gcotharn at September 08, 2006 09:06 AM (Rhyyb)
Posted by: Matt at September 08, 2006 11:39 AM (10G2T)
Posted by: Casca at September 08, 2006 01:32 PM (2gORp)
61 queries taking 0.1071 seconds, 168 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.