You may have been following the Reuters doctored photo controversy. If not,
Of course, my sources here at annika's journal came through for me again. Now we know why Reuters photographer Adnan Hajj felt the need to doctor the original photograph. Open the extended entry to view the original.
Sometimes smoke can form random patterns that are recognizable.
Lots of people have asked why this photographer would risk his career by crudely photoshopping the smoke in this particular picture. It makes sense now don't it?
1
Oh no, it's the poor bear again!
Posted by: Tammy at August 06, 2006 04:09 PM (u9OGS)
2
How dare you insult the Prophet of Satan, Muhammad (Pigs Be Upon Him).
Posted by: Marvin at August 06, 2006 05:39 PM (8a22E)
3
This is just for you, Marvin.
http://mohamsterdance.blogspot.com
Posted by: reagan80 at August 06, 2006 05:43 PM (dFOlH)
4
This is not the original. The original was a AP photo with very little smoke. You can see it on Little Green Footballs.
Knowing Reuters, it is very possible he had to Photoshop this picture to keep his job
Posted by: Jake at August 06, 2006 07:24 PM (r/5D/)
5
I'm sure this sort of stuff doesn't surprise most of the readers here. Typical MSM. Why not doctor photos when you are already doctoring the stories. Big explosions, every possible anecdote about "civilian" casualties, and, of course, Israel's "disproportionate response" is pretty much the guaranteed story line.
Posted by: Blu at August 06, 2006 07:32 PM (LXOfu)
6
yeah it doesnt. jahway put down baal, same group of folks. Samuel exterpated baal's supportors. Go forward Israel.
Posted by: patrick at August 06, 2006 09:18 PM (DtkPs)
7
sorry patrick that was me Jake.
Posted by: jake at August 06, 2006 09:19 PM (DtkPs)
Posted by: patrick at August 06, 2006 09:24 PM (DtkPs)
9
Now, just think of how many shennanigans the MSM indulged in and got away with back in the old days when there was no alternate media?
Posted by: kyle8 at August 07, 2006 03:12 AM (tRsnh)
10
Did any of you read that the Clinton News Network (aka CNN) is using imagery created by the Al-Manar network, the network owned and operated by Hezbollah? I'd also like to know if the MSM has has single story on the affect of thousands of Hez rockets (specifcally intended to kill real civilians)on Israel's children. (This comment and question are both derived from a guest post on the HH blog.) How many times will the MSM be fooled by Muslim propoganda? I'm willing to bet you won't see FOX News busting out BS imagery provided by terrorist propoganda machines.
Posted by: Blu at August 07, 2006 09:12 AM (j8oa6)
11
Just in case you'd like to know, I'll give you my prognostication on the Lamont/Lieberman race. Stick a fork in him, Lieberman is done. Now, can
Alan Schlesinger make Ned look like the kook he is?
Posted by: Casca at August 07, 2006 12:13 PM (rEC2k)
12
Jeez, Casca, I wish you were right, but Joe will walk away with this race in the General, running as an Independent.
What distresses me is that he'll organize with the D.'s anyway. But no way to elect a R. in Connecticut, the East's answer to San Francisco.
Posted by: shelly at August 07, 2006 10:22 PM (BJYNn)
13
great site.. you redneck punks should go to college after you wash up this year...
we should strip you from your citizenships :p
Posted by: sam cassidy at August 10, 2006 04:42 AM (KWSP7)
14
lame site. minds like these create wars. you guys are the real terrorists
Posted by: d.banga at August 13, 2006 09:38 PM (PKcah)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
