January 19, 2005
Most & Least Desired 2008 GOP Nominees
"Right Wing News emailed more than 200 right-of-center bloggers and asked them to send us a ranked list 1-5 of the candidates that they would most like to take the Republican nomination for President in 2008 and the 1-5 candidates they'd least like to see as the Republican nominee in 2008."
Check out the results here.
Posted by: annika at
09:12 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 70 words, total size 1 kb.
Two Democrats Embrace Their Historic Party Roots - Bigotry
Two prominent Democratic senators today announced that
they are against the confirmation of the first black female secretary of state in our nation's history. When confirmed, Condoleezza Rice, Ph.D. will be the highest ranking African American woman ever. A milestone achievement by an admirable and deserving woman.
But two Democratic senators, Barbara Boxer of California and John Kerry of Massachussetts, do not want to see it happen. Today, these two senators placed on the record, for all to see, their announcement to the world that they are indeed bigots.
Oh of course Boxer and Kerry would deny such an accusation vehemently. They would insist that they've always fought on behalf of minorities and women. But using the same twisted logic that senator Boxer used to call Dr. Rice a liar, i think it should be clear to all that John Kerry and Barbara Boxer have something against the advancement of women and minorities.
i'm just pointing out the contradictions in their public statements, that's all.
At this historic moment in the history of feminism and civil rights, John Kerry and Barbara Boxer stand together at the doorway of the Harry S. Truman Building like twin modern day Orval Faubi.
More: Steve at The Black Republican has more on Sheets Bird's opposition to Dr. Rice.
Posted by: annika at
03:08 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 232 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Oh, Fidilidee... they aren't racist, they LOVE their negras. They just don't want to see them movin' off the plantation, welfare plantation that is. It's a big bad world out there, and they need to be cared for like the children they are.
I could never understand why Republicans were loath to brand the D's as the party of slavery, which they are.
And if you'll pardon me, I've decided to refer to our junior Senator as Boobera Boxer from now on. It's pretty hard to be the dumbest bitch in the Senate with those twats from Maine there and all, but she is leading by a mile.
Posted by: Casca at January 19, 2005 05:03 PM (cdv3B)
2
Democrats are bigots? Oh, like Robert Byrd? Kleagle of the Klan, Democratic Senator...those go hand in hand. If he was a Republican, rest assured he would have been kicked into David-Dukedom years ago.
Posted by: spydrz at January 20, 2005 01:47 PM (6wyVk)
3
The Democrats are just upset they couldn't be the ones to promote an African American woman to the Sec'y of State post, since they're the only bastion of minority and women's rights progression on the planet. *rollseyes*
Posted by: Derek at January 21, 2005 10:49 AM (U0/um)
4
I heard that this was another case in which Kerry took both sides of the issue, saying that she was qualified but that he wouldn't vote for her.
Earlier in his career, Jesse Jackson realized that the Democratic Party often takes its black support for granted. I don't know if he realizes that any more.
Maybe this would be an appropriate time to dig up information about the House banking scandal, in which then-Representative Boxer was implicated.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at January 21, 2005 12:34 PM (FPdMX)
5
Of course, this is the same knee-jerk logic that conservatives always accuse liberals of using, a perversion of political correctness. There hasn't been any indication in the statements of Kerry or Boxer that Rice's race or gender had anything to do with their decision. There is, on the other hand, a record of the administration lying to and misleading the public over the last 4 years, which she obviously had a role in. Anyone who said what we now know to be true: that WMD's weren't in Iraq, that Hussein had no connection to Al Qaeda, that he represented no threat to to America or even his neighbors- was shut out of public discourse in the name of patriotism. The race-card is just another method of censoring the nay-sayers and confusing the issue.
Posted by: hal at January 26, 2005 01:02 PM (6QsJ1)
6
Oh Gawd, Hal. i try not to do this as much as i used to, but it's impossible not to set you straight on a few items.
Firstly, like all liberals (who claim to have cornered the market on nuance) you missed my rhetorical and somewhat sarcastic point. Please re-read the part about "using the same twisted logic."
"Lying and misleading?" We may have to agree to disagree on that somewhat semantic argument. However, even John Kerry said, knowing what he knew now, he'd still have supported the war. And you say SH represented no threat? Do you deny that SH hated the US? Absent a war to topple him, would you trust SH - after the weapons inspectors had left - NOT to re-establish his weapons programs, as the Duelfer report said had been his goal all along? To me, that constitutes a threat.
And finally, in what parallel universe have you or anyone who believes as you do (including thirteen United States senators from the minority party!) been "shut out of public discourse in the name of patriotism?" Certainly not on ABC, CBS, CNN, PBS, MSNBC, NBC, any of the major newspapers in the US, nearly all of America's college campuses, and certainly not on this blog? i'm sorry you
feel censored, but i just don't understand where you would get that idea.
Posted by: annika at January 26, 2005 06:41 PM (4oAj+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 18, 2005
Desperately Useless Fortune Cookie Blogging
See what depths my lack of blogging inspiration has driven me to?
It's pathetic, really.
Posted by: annika at
07:54 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Casca at January 18, 2005 08:29 PM (cdv3B)
2
Uh... maybe you need to get away from Sacramento for a bit.
Posted by: d-rod at January 18, 2005 08:56 PM (RXLBx)
3
The best fortune I ever received was:
"You are a nice guy who will make lots of money"
Half of it became true.
Posted by: jake at January 18, 2005 11:35 PM (6BwFR)
4
I'm really taking to the fortune cookie blogging!
Posted by: Paul at January 19, 2005 04:57 AM (vbP6L)
5
You could always talk about your favorite JDB movie. "Charlie Varrick," if I'm not mistaken.
Posted by: Victor at January 19, 2005 06:49 AM (L3qPK)
Posted by: JohnL at January 19, 2005 09:27 AM (YVul2)
7
These remind of those stupid Confuscious jokes that we'd tell in elementary school:
"He who stands on toilet is high on pot."
"Baseball is wrong. Man with four balls can't walk."
Posted by: Micah at January 19, 2005 10:12 AM (v/oTo)
8
LMAO!! you're crackin' me up with these things. i say, keep 'em coming!
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at January 19, 2005 10:50 AM (RpVKX)
9
these need to be consolidated into one fabulous post.
Posted by: candy girl at January 19, 2005 11:18 AM (Gj0AN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Yet More Useless Fortune Cookie Blogging
Interesting thought...
Sounds like fun, though.
Posted by: annika at
07:52 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
Useless Fortune Cookie Blogging, Again
Wisdom for the munchies:
Okay, good one to keep in mind.
Posted by: annika at
07:49 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
Yet More Useless Fortune Cookie Blogging Again
i guess i should be happy that they're reading me in Peking, but still...
How rude.
Posted by: annika at
07:45 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Useless Fortune Cookie Blogging
An oldie but a goodie:
Posted by: annika at
07:42 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
Commercially Useless Fortune Cookie Blogging
i do have some good news...
Posted by: annika at
07:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
Useless Fortune Cookie Blogging, Gangsta Style
Heyo yeh!
A Snoop Dogg fan at the Peking Noodle Company?
Posted by: annika at
07:41 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 23 words, total size 1 kb.
Useless February Second Fortune Cookie Blogging
Somebody
stop me...
Posted by: annika at
07:40 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
Here's An Idea
Since the Pope
has such influence, why doesn't he just get in his popemobile and go down to Iraq and ask the terrorists to stop killing people? It couldn't hurt.
Posted by: annika at
09:15 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I like how the Vatican thinks these scum are going to go, OH WAIT! The Pope says we havta give him back! SHIT!
Posted by: jeff at January 18, 2005 01:41 PM (X22sD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 17, 2005
Tonight's Fortune Cookie
So i got that goin' for me...
...which is nice.
Posted by: annika at
08:12 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Mmm Me think you might be in for a good time..;->)
Posted by: ikw3804 at January 17, 2005 08:56 PM (hGMOW)
2
What would public affairs in bed be, and how does one have bad luck in bed? Online gambling?
Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2005 09:19 PM (cdv3B)
3
Although, 'affairs in bed' should never be followed up with the term 'peking noodle'.
Yikes.
Posted by: Robbie at January 18, 2005 06:01 AM (AAqv2)
4
So they're saving us all some time and just printing "in bed" on there now?
And another Caddyshack reference? You're killing me!
Posted by: Micah at January 18, 2005 06:38 AM (v/oTo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Happy Birthday Martin Luther King, Jr.
Here's a cute picture of Mike and Coretta in 1956.
Read Why This Day Matters, by Soonerland, at Dustbury.com. Link via Michelle Malkin.
Posted by: annika at
12:58 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thank God we didn't have another civil war back then. I will always have respect for MLK because of his non-violent approach to gain civil rights.
P.S. Don't tell anyone, but MLK's father and grandfather were supposedly life-long members of Lincoln's party.
Posted by: reagan80 at January 17, 2005 08:13 AM (hlMFQ)
2
P.S. Don't tell anyone MLK was
1) a serial adulterer
2) a plagiarist
3) a communist sympathiser
4) a supporter of affirmative action and
5) a vociferous liberal opponent of U.S. actions in Vietnam.
Conservatives should remember what a dirtbag this guy was, even if he did help bring about a salutary social reform.
Posted by: Roach at January 17, 2005 10:40 AM (DHoAQ)
3
Besides, according to his FBI file, he preferred blonds.
Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2005 12:53 PM (cdv3B)
4
Roach,
If all of that stuff is true, your post has better informed me about the guy's flaws. I'll subtract 2(out of 10) points from MLK on the respect scale just for the commie thing alone.
If the media could turn Nelson Mandela, Kofi Annan, and Jesse Jackson into demi-gods, I wonder what the truth is about the great satan, Sen. Joe McCarthy. Is Ann Coulter right? Was he unfairly FUBAR'd by the liberal media?
P.S. Joe Piss Capeaux is on Cavuto now.
Posted by: reagan80 at January 17, 2005 01:34 PM (hlMFQ)
5
I think Tailgunner Joe did as much to besmirch his reputation as anyone, but on the basic fact there were, in fact, card-carrying communists in high government places he got the premise, if not every last detail, correct. (Points to Ann for so noticing.)
As to the others mentioned, on that same scale of 0-10 (I'm leaving Dr King at 10, despite his manifest flaws), I'd give Mandela a 6 and Jackson a 4; Annan struggles to one and a half.
Posted by: CGHill at January 17, 2005 03:17 PM (AUDQP)
6
Well CG, as much as i like skinny assed conservative blonds. One is originally informed by the 1950-something Buckley classic, "McCarthy and His Enemies" by WFB and his brother in law, L Brent Bozell. I have this in digital form if anyone requires it. I'm sure that bill won't mind. Miss Coulter arrived late to this fight, but she's welcome on the firestep.
Regards,
C
Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2005 05:17 PM (cdv3B)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Social Security Privatization
Young Pundit has a rundown of
the arguments against Social Security privatization.
Posted by: annika at
07:41 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Excellent link. The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy can always use the "compassion" card to mask the malignance and stupidity of their policies.
Posted by: reagan80 at January 17, 2005 08:07 AM (hlMFQ)
2
I'm going to have to post something on this. The left has definately decided that since "Bush lied about Iraq", we can make the public think he is lying about ss. Poor strategy, particularly for the under 30 demo that has plenty of access to information and is clearly aware of the ponzi scheme that is in place.
Posted by: Pursuit at January 17, 2005 09:47 AM (VqIuy)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 16, 2005
Cheapo Wine Pick Of The Week
1999 Trinity Oaks Zinfandel, $4.99 at Bel Air Market. This is good shit. Tastes like a ten dollar bottle of wine. Looks and smells good too. The 1999 label isn't as pretty as the one
pictured here, but don't let that fool you. At that price, i could drink two bottles tonight, but i won't.
Posted by: annika at
08:38 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Have you tried Two Buck Chuck? You can get it at Trader Joe's. Straight from Napa.
Posted by: spydrz at January 16, 2005 09:42 PM (OJ9pA)
2
Can't recommend two buck chuck at any price. Its jammy and unpleasant. I found the white chuck undrinkable. I had heard that it is really just the old Franzia box wine repacked. I don't know if its true, but very believable
By the way, if you want to spend a couple more bucks, try one of the Seghesio Family vineyards zins. Its getting more expensive as recognition grows, but the wines are bold with decent structure, and still obtainable at a $15-20 price point.
Posted by: Pursuit at January 17, 2005 05:24 AM (VqIuy)
3
Spendthrifts!!! Go down to Vons, and get a six pack of their private label "Searidge" Merlot at about $3 a bottle. With the ten percent discount, one can afford to bathe in the stuff. Witness my newly acquired swarthy complexion.
Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2005 12:59 PM (cdv3B)
4
That Searidge would cost me about $4,000 including airfare from Chicago! You are looking fabulous though Casca.
Posted by: Pursuit at January 17, 2005 06:44 PM (VqIuy)
5
You poor bastard, I've seen the wine aisle at Luckys... screwtop Lambrusco, and two dollar champagne with plastic corks. Did I mention that the Santa Annas are blowing, and it was 80 on the beach today? Mwahahahahaha!!!
Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2005 09:48 PM (cdv3B)
6
Easy Casca, $4,000 for wine and the elimination of an on-line mocker is begining to look like a great deal!
Posted by: Pursuit at January 18, 2005 08:35 AM (VqIuy)
7
I couldn't tell from the picture, was that a screw off lid or a will I need a church key?
Posted by: Dean at January 18, 2005 07:04 PM (tRYYF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Sunday Playoff Picks
Huge games today. i predict TO-less Philly, (whom, all year long, i figured would go all the way) will lose to Minnesota, with bad-ass Randy Moss looking to silence his critics. i also predict that the Pats (famous for their winning streak) will go down at the hands of the Colts (famous for their QB's TD streak).
Halftime update: Moss' head is not in the game. My predictions have become like the cover of Sports Illustrated.
Postgame update: Philadelphia won pretty handily, 27 to 14, setting up a battle of the birds next weekend. (Can i take credit for being the first to call the NFC championship game the battle of the birds?) i totally forgot about the weather at Gillette Stadium, but i'm sticking with my prediction for the Pats-Colts game.
Post Pats game update: Fucken shit.
Posted by: annika at
10:03 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 144 words, total size 1 kb.
1
As good as Moss is, he's still a moody, overpaid prima donna, who has never had anyone in authority set limits on him.
Until that happens, he will continue to be an immature kid w/too much money and too much time on his hands.
Given his behavior in today's game, I rest my case.
Look for an Eagles/Patriot Super Bowl.
Will be a great game.
Posted by: joe at January 16, 2005 03:38 PM (6WJRY)
2
Sadly (for you) the pats come through once again. Another (perhaps weather-related) victory for the home team and still with a hodge-podge defense (that played amazingly)!
Posted by: gunge at January 16, 2005 06:34 PM (HI4G2)
3
Weather or not the Pats were going to win this one Annika. Tony Dungy is the Marty Shotenheimer of the new millenium. Great coach, but as I watched the game it bacame very clear that the Pats were on a whole different level of intensity. Its like when we had Ditka coaching the Bears. Not a great strategist leading up to the game, but with great players, nobody brought more intesity on Sunday afternoon.
Posted by: Pursuit at January 17, 2005 05:16 AM (VqIuy)
4
i think Belichick gets his team ready better than any coach in the NFL. Plus NE has the cutest GB ever.
Posted by: annika at January 17, 2005 07:23 AM (A7KCH)
5
I assume you mean QB, as in Brady. I'm secure enough to admit he is attractive, however, did you see his post game interview yesterday? Whats with the hair and beard? The guy looks a bit like a cross between the BGs before really big hair and Clint in the Spaghetti Western days! Maybe it was just a bad case of helmet head.
Posted by: Pursuit at January 17, 2005 09:44 AM (VqIuy)
Posted by: annika at January 17, 2005 10:29 AM (zAOEU)
7
i also predict that the Pats (famous for their winning streak) will go down at the hands of the Colts (famous for their QB's TD streak).
He, he, he ,he...
Not only will the Pats slam the Steelers on their field (Heinz - ring a bell?) shutting up their mutant fans, but they also will win the body count!
Now that's a threesome!
Posted by: Radical Redneck at January 17, 2005 12:37 PM (K44zK)
8
Outside of New England, it's widely known that he's as queer as a three dollar bill.
Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2005 01:25 PM (cdv3B)
9
Casca,
Well, then maybe Buffalo ought to find one.
Posted by: Mark at January 17, 2005 03:54 PM (nQAo8)
10
Well, I'm a big Steelers fan going all the way back to when I wanted to be Mean Joe Green, Dwight White, and L.C. Greenwood all in the same person. Not bad for a white suburban kid.
None-the-less, its hard to see how the Steelers win this one - especially if our host picks 'em.
Posted by: Pursuit at January 17, 2005 06:48 PM (VqIuy)
Posted by: annika at January 17, 2005 06:59 PM (KgPgI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Grrr
It takes me about 20 seconds of watching network news before i get into a bad mood. NBC News this morning: "With the Iraqi elections only two weeks away, the Bush administration appears to be engaged in a campaign to lower expectations." WTF? Whose expectations are they talking about? The mainstream media has been on their own campaign to lower expectations about Iraq for the last two years.
The NBC reporter also made a point of saying that Bush's approval ratings are currently lower than Reagan's or Clinton's at similar points in their presidencies. Now, Bush is certainly not "the great communicator,"* but i have an idea how Bush can get his approval ratings to match the spike in Clinton's ratings after January 21, 1998. Bush should get a blow job!
_______________
* U. S. Grant or Andrew Johnson might have been less articulate than Bush . . . but only when they were drunk.
Posted by: annika at
09:04 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 157 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Matt at January 16, 2005 04:02 PM (TLYaI)
Posted by: annika at January 16, 2005 07:50 PM (eDgQ2)
3
I don't know Annika, it sounded to me like you were volunteering for the job too!
On a side note, whats the deal with those birth control commercials - the "there she goes" ones? I won't go into it here as I have a post on it Pursuit of Happiness, but isn't that a strange jingle for something that is supposed to limit pregnancy?
Posted by: Pursuit at January 17, 2005 05:19 AM (VqIuy)
4
Yah, we discussed that in the most recent annieconversation.
Posted by: annika at January 17, 2005 07:25 AM (A7KCH)
5
Shit, I think he commuicates just fine. Some people just don't like what he has to say. YEEHAAA!
Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2005 01:28 PM (cdv3B)
6
Who(?) would do the honors? This is critical to achieving... maximum... approval ratings!
How would each of these impact Bush's... approval ratings?
1. Skank Woman
2. Phyllis Schlafly
3. Angie Harmon
4. Kennedy(I meant the VJ-- but pick your own)
5. Bo Derek
6. Barbra Streisand-- since its not cool to joke about forcibly raping Barbra, Bush could pull this off by blackmailing Barbra with threats of future ecological atrocity-- or threats of opening up Malibu for oil exploration, et al.
7. Mary Tyler Moore-- Bush could blackmail with threats of wholesale lobster slaughter.
8. Brigitte Bardot-- Bush threatens to personally shock and awe baby seals.
9. Hillary! THE ULTIMATE! Bush's approval ratings skyrocket as he succeeds where Bill failed. What is the bait/blackmail? Hmmmm... a simple lie about Bush's willingness to support Hillary in some area. A man who's not willing to lie for increased approval ratings simply doesn't want them bad enough.
Posted by: gcotharn at January 19, 2005 12:17 PM (JfSl9)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 14, 2005
Just An Observation
It is impossible to listen to Louis Armstrong's 1931 recording of
Stardust without tearing up. Trust me on this.
Posted by: annika at
03:28 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Kinda makes me nostalgic for a time I never lived in. How Gen X.
Vielen Dank,
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at January 15, 2005 04:36 AM (4uHYC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 13, 2005
N-N-N-Noonan
Peggy Noonan, whose grip on reality i thought was becoming a bit shaky based on some of her recent columns,* has rehabilitated my opinion of her with her latest piece, "
MSM Requiem." i think it's the best post-Rathergate commentary i have read, or will ever hope to read.
Now anyone can take to the parapet and announce the news. This will make for a certain amount of confusion. But better that than one-party rule and one-party thought. Only 20 years ago, when you were enraged at what you felt was the unfairness of a story, or a bias on the part of the storyteller, you could do this about it: nothing. You could write a letter.
When I worked at CBS a generation ago I used to receive those letters. Sometimes we read them, and sometimes we answered them, but not always. Now if you see such a report and are enraged you can do something about it: You can argue in public on a blog or on TV, you can put forth information that counters the information in the report. You can have a voice. You can change the story. You can bring down a news division. Is this improvement? Oh yes it is.
That's exactly it. No more shouting in vain at the TV News. In the post MSM world, no one can have a monopoly on information, and everyone has an opportunity to be heard. Even you and me.
Via Lopsided Poopdeck.
Update: Check out this Krauthammer piece too. Link via commenter Shelly.
_______________
* Like when she suggested that Steven Spielberg could singlehandedly solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Come on! If Jason Alexander and Richard Geer can't do it, what chance does Spielberg have?
Posted by: annika at
08:45 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 288 words, total size 2 kb.
1
A Caddyshack reference? I think I love you.
Posted by: Micah at January 13, 2005 09:40 PM (v/oTo)
2
I am with you. Her article saying no one wanted to be DNC Chm was just plain wrong. But this Rathergate article is quite good!
Posted by: Rod Stanton at January 14, 2005 04:22 AM (IcheV)
3
Annie:
I KNOW I love you; it's just that I love Peggy more.
Sorry, it has been a long time thing since she first began writing for RWR. If you think she looks good now, you should have seen her then.
It is not fair that someone that is so good looking should also be blessed with a superior intellect and the ability to express it.
But then again, the only "fair" I know is in Pomona.
Posted by: shelly at January 14, 2005 12:37 PM (6krEN)
4
Amen, how sweet freedom is.
Posted by: Casca at January 14, 2005 06:26 PM (cdv3B)
5
Let's be careful here, this is the same woman that wrote a lot trash about the President and other things. Like all Liberals if you will ever notice, they usaully will come out with something like this and then turn around and stab you with a BIG BOWIE knife and smile while they do it.
Let just watch and wait a while on this.....
Posted by: ikw3804 at January 16, 2005 06:54 AM (SVrtY)
6
You may be thinking of another columnist, ikw. Peggy Noonan was Reagan's speechwriter, and i've always known her to be a solid conservative.
Posted by: annika at January 16, 2005 09:56 AM (oJFxj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
65kb generated in CPU 0.068, elapsed 0.1152 seconds.
73 queries taking 0.0999 seconds, 258 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.