August 08, 2005
Compliance Update
For safety reasons i have regularly monitored the actuation readings of this blog on a semi-periodic basis. Up until now, i have done this without telling anyone, because i didn't want to alarm you.

Now, with the new federal regulations set to kick in at the beginning of next year, i've decided to make the semi-periodic actuation readings public. i feel it's always better for my visitors to know, rather than to not know. And i am proud to say that this is the first blog in the history of the blogosphere to comply in advance with the upcoming, more stringent federal guidelines as enumerated at Title 51, vol. 3, ch. XVIII, parts 751 to 782, subparts S through T, inclusive.
i hope that by providing this information to you, i have put at least some of your minds at ease. Feel free to contact me with any concerns you might have, but at this time i'd like to remind everyone that to date there has been no credible study linking blog actuation levels to any serious health risk. However, i'm sure you will agree that it never hurts to be safe and informed. That's part of my commitment to you, dear visitor, to keep you safe and/or informed.
Carry on.
Posted by: annika at
11:24 PM
| Comments (16)
| Add Comment
Post contains 215 words, total size 1 kb.
1
My head hurts... my head or my ass... I think I'll have another drink.
Posted by: Casca at August 08, 2005 11:58 PM (qBTBH)
2
You know, this makes no fucking sense whatsoever. Time to explain another joke, annika.
Casca, drinking in a bar 'til one passes out frequently leads to a pain-in-the-ass feeling, especially if a certain Democratic ex-Prez is around.
Posted by: Victor at August 09, 2005 05:30 AM (L3qPK)
3
I think what you have created here is an "attractive nusance". Clearly we are endangering our health, yet unable to avoid said danger.
Expect to hear from my attorneys you diabolical fiend.
Posted by: Pursuit at August 09, 2005 06:03 AM (n/TNS)
4
you should probably shut down the blog until the EPA can investigate, I know that I want I would do.
You know just to be safe.
Posted by: cubicle at August 09, 2005 06:33 AM (nyNr0)
Posted by: annika at August 09, 2005 06:45 AM (1/WKY)
6
How long until Earth First, Greenpeace, or some other lefty organization starts a campaign about the dangers of over-actuation?
Posted by: Trevor at August 09, 2005 06:52 AM (RwZxT)
7
BZZZ
Who is Joe Don Baker?
Posted by: reagan80 at August 09, 2005 07:53 AM (Su79D)
8
I have no cause for legal action. I was this way before Annika got here.
Posted by: MarkD at August 09, 2005 10:08 AM (oQofX)
9
Yes, Annika, I understand this completely: "safe and informed." Great thought and worthy of widespead publication nowadays.
Posted by: Southern(USA)whiteboy at August 09, 2005 05:23 PM (zxjPs)
10
Explanation:
Law School is a mind altering drug.
Posted by: shelly at August 10, 2005 02:58 AM (6mUkl)
11
Even though I don't get this joke, I feel obligated to inform the blog administrator the little needle is bouncing between 150 and 160, which is, according to the scale, in the danger zone.
Posted by: Victor at August 10, 2005 04:41 AM (L3qPK)
12
Thanks Victor, i'm working on the problem right now.
Posted by: annika at August 10, 2005 07:12 AM (o8Po/)
13
That's it?
I thought I'd win a prize or something. For, you know, being the first one to let you know it was in the danger zone.
Posted by: Victor at August 10, 2005 07:37 AM (L3qPK)
14
ooops! Forgot to mention it's pegged. I guess whatever this joke is, it's about to be sprung on us, like those snakes in a peanut can.
Posted by: Victor at August 10, 2005 07:39 AM (L3qPK)
15
Okay, everything should be back to normal now.
Posted by: annika at August 10, 2005 08:13 AM (o8Po/)
16
Whatttt? Are you talking about government blog regulations? Does the mean I can't talk and jabber recklessy about whatever I want and my site?
Posted by: Max L at August 14, 2005 11:50 PM (33nZo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 07, 2005
Jeopardy With annika, Round 24
The category is "Fuckin' Lawyers," for $400. It's a video clue.
Trevor is in the lead with $1600, Casca has $1200, Victor has $1100, Phil has $500, Skippy and D-Rod have $400 each, Jasen and Shelly have $300 each, Ken and Kyle have $200 each.
And Shelly has found the first Daily Double!
The rules for Daily Double are almost the same as on tv, with an important exception. In my game everybody gets to play the Daily Double.
Every response must have a wager in it. The lowest you can wager is $50 and the highest you can wager is either $500 or however much money you have earned already, whichever is higher. Or you can wager any amount in between.
One caveat. Since Shelly picked the Daily Double, his response gets priority. So if you guess before him you run the risk of tipping him off to the correct response. At the expiration of the time limit (10:00 p.m. Pacific time on Monday) the rest of the responses will count in order of their posting.
Since i'm running out of ideas for "Fuckin' Lawyers," this time the clue will be in reverse. i'll tell you who's fucking him, you tell me the name of the lawyer.
Posted by: annika at
09:29 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 218 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Go 4 TLI at August 07, 2005 11:19 PM (dr65V)
2
Bzzzzz:
I'll bet the whole $300, plus the mug that Casca wants and doesn't have.
Bzzzz:
Who is Steve Young?
P.S. Even if I am dead wrong, it puts us all out of our misery and you guys can get back in the game. It has to be him or Marino, and I don't think Marino is a lawyer; I think Young is a lawyer.
Posted by: shelly at August 08, 2005 03:16 AM (6mUkl)
3
Damn. I just re-read the rules; Casca's right, I am getting senile.
If it's not too late, I'd rather bet $500 than the $300. I didn't know I could until I re-read them.
I'm going to Disneyland.
Posted by: shelly at August 08, 2005 03:25 AM (6mUkl)
4
BZZZ:
Who is Joe Don Baker?
Posted by: reagan80 at August 08, 2005 05:14 AM (HWp3X)
5
(whips buzzer into submission, grinds it with high heel, calls it worthless, then pisses on it-- all for only $500 an hour)
Who is Anne Heche!?
Kevin
_
Posted by: Kevin Kim at August 08, 2005 06:09 AM (1PcL3)
6
Bzzz
Annie, you got some pretty sick folks here..
Posted by: shelly at August 08, 2005 06:43 AM (6mUkl)
7
You got it Shelly, at $300. Pick the next category, please.
Posted by: annika T. at August 08, 2005 08:16 AM (UCaeJ)
8
OK, I'd like to appeal that last ruling by the judges, since I made the change before anyone confirmed or denied the answer, but I am assuming that my chances of wiinning the appeal are as good as Hillary being President, so, I'll go on.
How about people Annika would like to meet for $500.00?
Posted by: shelly at August 08, 2005 09:55 AM (6mUkl)
9
The question is moot!!
I get the car......
(If anyone on this blog knows where the above came from, I will be massively impressed)
Posted by: Jason O. at August 08, 2005 01:40 PM (2CAKL)
10
Jesse Jackson's appearance on Saturday Night Live?
Posted by: annika T. at August 08, 2005 02:11 PM (zAOEU)
11
Damm, Its no fun getting to the game late all the time. My cable internet connection is fried and they wont come out to fix it till saturday. I am blogging from a goddam internet cafe, Complete with bad avant garde art and lots of designer soda pops and the usual Lattes.
BTW Steve Young was overated.
Posted by: Kyle at August 08, 2005 03:08 PM (zIJtl)
12
Whiplash; The Cowboy Monkey
Posted by: Casca at August 08, 2005 11:12 PM (qBTBH)
13
Jason O.
That would be Jesse Jackson!
Posted by: Brad at August 09, 2005 01:49 AM (Qz3ul)
14
The question is moot!!
I get the car......
(If anyone on this blog knows where the above came from, I will be massively impressed)
Posted by Jason O. on Aug. 8, 2005
BZZZ: Who is my ex-wife?
Posted by: shellly at August 09, 2005 01:51 AM (6mUkl)
15
I'm in the same boat, Kyle. On vacation for a week, then the cable broadband takes a dive sometime Saturday. I'm tellin' ya, Comcast is the best ad campaign Verizon DSL has run yet.
Posted by: Victor at August 09, 2005 05:25 AM (L3qPK)
16
"BTW Steve Young was overated"
Yep, the hall of fame is full of overrated players. Sheesh.
Posted by: Ted at August 09, 2005 11:30 AM (blNMI)
Posted by: annika at August 17, 2005 08:12 PM (+oyaL)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 06, 2005
Child Abuse In Santa Cruz
Radical Redneck alerted me to this story about
child abuse going on in Santa Cruz.
While most summer camps get kids out of the house and give parents a break, a group called Art in Action is nurturing the next Michael Moore . . .
Art in ActionÂ’s 'art and empowerment' camp is being held at the Quaker Center nestled in the redwoods of Ben Lomond. Campers at the 10-day retreat attend workshops on cultural activism, nonviolent action and alternative media.
'The reality is that the media is not actually showing whatÂ’s really going on in Iraq,' said Jouse Bustos, 19, of central Los Angeles. 'By doing this mural, IÂ’m showing whatÂ’s going on.'
And Jouse knows what the media doesn't because . . . how? i'd wager the punk hasn't actually been to Iraq, nor have any of his retarded professors. So, guess what. Unless he's getting his information from out his ass, he's probably getting from the media.
Bustos is one of 25 young people attending the camp. For 10 days, they learn to say 'no' to military recruiting, racism and war, and 'yes' to eco-justice, community and love.
Nice. If these people had their way, i don't suppose they'd go crying to be protected by that same military when their bus gets bombed. No, they'd never do that.
Campers spend their time making banners, writing poetry and choreographing dances that represent a vision of 'positive alternatives to the madness of war and oppression.'
i got a positive alternative to war and oppression too. How about a democratic Middle East? How about us killing the terrorists so they stop blowing people up?
'Art is the best way to communicate social messages,' said camp founder Alli Chalabi-Starr, who grew up in Santa Cruz but now lives in San Francisco.
Art is the best way to communicate social messages, huh? i bet if i went to that camp and i made some art that communicated my own social message, i'd be "peacefully" thrown out of there on my ass.
Here's an example of the type of social message that's acceptable at this camp:
Some [campers] glue together pieces of newspaper that will become the giant puppet unveiled Thursday night — the divided face of a Muslim woman and woman of color from the United States.
Stamped across the face will be an American flag, said camp co-founder Maryam Roberts of San Francisco.
The face 'represents silence forced upon both women by their governments,' Roberts said. 'There is a feeling of silence.'
Oh gawd, spare me that "chill wind" argument again. You're at a fucking
protest camp. If the government wanted to censor you, you'd be sitting in jail next to Tim Robbins and Michael Moore, holding their Oscars.
Instead, people like this thrive in the United States, where their message is heard loud and clear wherever they want to spew it forth, from the office of the California Attorney General to the streets of Manhattan. That's not censorship.
On the other hand, i just made a piece of protest art myself. It's a work intended to shake up the establishment and challenge the oppressive orthodoxy of California's ruling elites. i'll sell it to you cheap for $750, which also happens to be the per person cost of that stupid protest camp. It's suitable for framing and i'm calling it "Piss Boxer."
i wonder how many art galleries i can find anywhere who would be willing to exhibit it?
Posted by: annika at
11:25 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 578 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Every March, left-wing whacko kids flock to Austin to attend "alternative spring breaks". Where, instead of hanging out at the beach and doing body shots off their normal college-aged peers, they learn how to make signs and chant (otherwise known as protesting), and regurgitate the rhetoric of their 1960s burn-out parents and professors.
I wrote about the
anti-death penalty alternative spring break a few months ago. Oddly, it sounds like they were "learning" the exact same lessons as the anti-war protest campers in CA.
Posted by: Robbie at August 06, 2005 01:54 PM (htx4h)
2
Is that the worst pic you can find of her? How about a reprise... "Shit Boxer"?
Posted by: Casca at August 06, 2005 03:33 PM (qBTBH)
3
I'll add this to my (very, very long) "Why I Don't Live in California" list.
Posted by: Mark at August 06, 2005 08:17 PM (Deyc8)
4
I'll add this to my (very, very long) "Why I Don't Live in California" list.
Posted by: Mark at August 06, 2005 08:18 PM (Deyc8)
5
You should all be more considerate to these people. They must be very committed to their cause seeing as they probably have their lunch money taken from them nearly every day. It probably took them quite some time to save up the cash for this camp.
Too bad the camp fee doesn't cover hygiene classes and a gym membership.
Also, while I may not be an expert on this (after all, I said "yes" to military recruiting), how long does it take someone to learn to say "no" to anything? There has to be at least 7 different places between the initial contact with the recruiter and reception where people can say "no" to recruitment. Plus, don't the "no means no" classes cover cover some of this ground prior to the camp?
Posted by: james at August 06, 2005 09:36 PM (blfs0)
6
What *is* it with these people and their giant puppets?
I guess there's a new branch of the art of rhetoric: Instead of trying to persuade people to your point of view with reason and eloquence, you persuade them with puppets...
Posted by: David Foster at August 07, 2005 03:23 PM (7TmYw)
7
[['The reality is that the media is not actually showing whatÂ’s really going on in Iraq,' said Jouse Bustos, 19, of central Los Angeles. 'By doing this mural, IÂ’m showing whatÂ’s going on.']]
Heh. Maybe he should let the kids draw a mural with the below "visual aids".....
http://www.pulitzer.org/year/2005/breaking-news-photography/works/warzone20.html
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/photos/B/BAG12305032334.html?SITE=TXABI&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Where's the cognitive dissonance for these people?
Posted by: reagan80 at August 07, 2005 07:50 PM (SS/w9)
8
I can only hope that Ward Churchill finds out about this camp, applies for a teaching position there, and gets turned down because even they have standards.
Posted by: Sub-Human at August 08, 2005 07:47 AM (yTuVc)
Posted by: Radical Redneck at August 10, 2005 01:54 PM (6BiLR)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jeopardy With annika, Round 23
The category is "Fash-ism," for $300. It's a video clue.
Trevor is in the lead with $1600, Casca has $1200, Victor has $1100, Phil has $500, Skippy and D-Rod have $400 each, Jasen has $300, Ken and Kyle have $200 each. Astoundingly, the two Daily Doubles still haven't been found.
Posted by: annika at
11:25 AM
| Comments (20)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: CB at August 06, 2005 11:50 AM (6krEN)
2
note to CB.
i think annie is looking for an answer in the form of a question.
i.e., jeopardy and all you know.
Posted by: louielouie at August 06, 2005 11:56 AM (xKfMm)
3
i'm sorry CB, the judges cannot accept that response.
Posted by: annika trebek at August 06, 2005 12:00 PM (qBVjN)
4
I think they only enforce that rule in double jeopardy, could be wrong though.
Posted by: Vince at August 06, 2005 01:04 PM (KK0p9)
5
True, although there's no double jeopardy in annika's game. The 30 second timer is ticking CB.
anyone?
Bueller?
Posted by: annika T. at August 06, 2005 01:09 PM (qBVjN)
6
BZZZZZ!
What are Capri's?
Posted by: shelly at August 06, 2005 01:54 PM (6mUkl)
7
Bzzzz
What are parachute pants?
What?
Posted by: Bzzzz at August 06, 2005 01:57 PM (htx4h)
8
BZZZ
What are Daisy Dukes?
Posted by: Kyle at August 06, 2005 03:17 PM (zIJtl)
9
DING!
What are lean trousers?
Posted by: Casca at August 06, 2005 03:43 PM (qBTBH)
10
(fires buzzer out urethra)
What are billowing Sith robes??
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at August 06, 2005 09:49 PM (TDwc6)
11
zzz, zzz, zzz.. receives electric shock from first use of defective buzzer..
What are capris?
Posted by: Charlie Gordon at August 07, 2005 09:50 AM (fO5Bb)
12
DING!
What are hot pants?
Posted by: Mark at August 07, 2005 02:10 PM (PjRZw)
13
Gonna have to give it to Shelly. Pick a category, Shelly
Posted by: annika T. at August 07, 2005 02:49 PM (judiW)
14
Wait a second! You're going to give "capri's" to the spelling maven?
Posted by: Casca at August 07, 2005 03:43 PM (qBTBH)
15
I'll take fucking lawyers for 400.
Eat me, Casca.
Posted by: Shelly at August 07, 2005 07:24 PM (6mUkl)
16
By the way, I just wanted to get on the board for the fun of it; I already have a mug!
Posted by: shelly at August 07, 2005 07:25 PM (6mUkl)
17
Such uncommodious language from a member of the bar... a senile one too. That is at least the tenth time, that I've heard about that mug.
Posted by: Casca at August 07, 2005 07:30 PM (qBTBH)
18
Casca:
Don't knock senility; the stress is gone.
You'll get there sometime yourself, so be kind.
Besides, I figure I've got a few good years left.
I'm not as good as I once was, but once, I'm as good as I ever was.
Posted by: shelly at August 07, 2005 08:19 PM (6mUkl)
19
A mug? All they gave me was a cheap ballpoint pen: umpteenth reason for me to be pissed at Jeopardy.
Posted by: Dave J at August 07, 2005 09:47 PM (8XpMm)
20
What are Cigarette pants?
Posted by: Lori at August 18, 2005 06:49 PM (PYI26)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 05, 2005
i'd Say That's About Right
I am 27% Hippie.
I need to step away from the tie-dye. I smell too good to be a hippie and my dad is probably a cop. Being a hippie is not a fashion craze, man. It was a way of life, in the 60Â’s, man.
Via Overlords.
Posted by: annika at
08:02 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 63 words, total size 1 kb.
1
So you're going to be the next Bill Kunstler eh?
Posted by: Casca at August 05, 2005 08:19 PM (qBTBH)
2
Hippies do not go to law school or have a wardrobe full of high heeled shoes and such.
Give it up, girl, you are bound for success, like it or not.
My predication is, that you'll like it.
Money frees you up to do what you want, and you have a universe of wants.
Make sure the guy you select can take you there as well.
Hippies need not apply.
Posted by: shelly at August 05, 2005 08:22 PM (6mUkl)
3
You may be a rebel, your politics prove that.
But you are not a hippy.
Posted by: Jake at August 06, 2005 08:12 AM (r/5D/)
4
44%... dang, i knew that!! heee... thx for the quiz it was fun...
Posted by: maizzy at August 06, 2005 09:25 AM (FX8gc)
Posted by: mark at August 06, 2005 08:19 PM (Deyc8)
6
10%, "So Not a Hippie." Thank God! I expect I got even as, er, high as I did was because I said yes to one of the two pot legalization questions, i.e., marijuana should be legal but probably won't ever be because most of its advocates are, well, useless pothead hippies. ;-)
Posted by: Dave J at August 08, 2005 11:23 AM (8XpMm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Dukes Of Hazzard Review
i didn't want to add to any of the Dukes Of Hazzard hype that's been going on, but i have to link to the San Francisco Chronicle's review. It may be the
funniest review ever, certainly the most scathing movie review i've ever seen.
There are routine movies and others that blaze a trail. There are routine bad movies and others so horrendous that they redefine bad, that make us look up synonyms for agonizing and abysmal and then gnash our teeth because the language has not kept pace with the decline of film. There are even movies that are so blazingly rotten that they can redefine past experiences and make us look back on recent weak efforts like 'Stealth' or 'Fantastic Four' and think, 'Ooh, that was fascinating.'
'The Dukes of Hazzard' is hardly some routine bad movie. Rather, it's one of the elite, right up there with 'I Am Curious ... Yellow' (1967) and Bo Derek's 'Ghosts Can't Do It' (1990), in stiff competition for the lamest thing ever put on celluloid. Of course, that makes it, by default, the worst film so far of the 21st century, but to say that does little to acknowledge the ambition behind this project. Make no mistake, director Jay Chandrasekhar was swinging for the fences with this one. He was shooting for the millennium.
The movie establishes, with startling economy, that it's about two imbeciles. In a sleepy rural county, a red car comes blazing down a country road, careening and swerving, while the two morons in the front seats yell 'Woo-ooo!' and 'Yee-haaa!' These are Bo (Seann William Scott) and Luke Duke (Johnny Knoxville), the loudest, laughingest, hell-raisingest pair of single- celled organisms ever to get a Georgia driver's license.
lol. It gets better.
Posted by: annika at
08:23 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 300 words, total size 2 kb.
1
This guy's got sort of a greatest hits of bitch-slaps
http://lifegoesoff.blogspot.com/2005/08/dismissal-of-week-my-cup-runneth-over.html
Posted by: ken at August 05, 2005 10:03 AM (xD5ND)
2
Oh, and the New York Post gives it three stars
http://www.nypost.com/movies/50792.htm
Posted by: ken at August 05, 2005 10:48 AM (xD5ND)
3
Roger Ebert has a pretty funny (yet equally as scathing review too.
And yet, I still want to see it. Like a train wreck, I know I shouldn't be watching it, but I can't take my eyes off of it.....
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at August 05, 2005 11:19 AM (kxatG)
4
Very funny review...reminds me of Joe Morgenstern's review of Lost In Space: The movie's f/x and soundtrack is like wrapping a baseball bat in a towel and repeatedly striking yourself in the head.
Posted by: Jason O. at August 05, 2005 12:14 PM (2CAKL)
5
His claim of it being the worst film in the 21st century is untrue. Anything done by michael fat ass moore has that distinction.
Posted by: Theresa at August 05, 2005 03:04 PM (nDaxF)
6
Now now, If you've never seen Donny and Marie in "Going Coconuts", you've never really seen a truly bad movie.
Posted by: Casca at August 05, 2005 06:02 PM (qBTBH)
7
While I would agree in principle with Theresa, Dukes can't be worse than Thelma and Louise.
Posted by: Wayne at August 05, 2005 10:52 PM (9ziwT)
8
As for Dukes of HazzardÂ…
Nothing has summed it up better than CNN’s review that “this flick is a car wreck with boobs.”
Posted by: Sean at August 05, 2005 11:50 PM (2JxeN)
9
I was surprised by how little I hated it.
Posted by: Jim Treacher at August 08, 2005 11:54 PM (uuNVx)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jeopardy On Another Channel
i have been remiss in not alerting you to Scorebard's Jeopardy game with a baseball/poetry theme over at
Humbug Journal. The game is ongoing right now, and while Scorebard was inspired by the game here, his clues are much harder. i haven't gotten one yet.
Posted by: annika at
08:01 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
Jeopardy With annika, Round 22
The category is "Fuckin' Lawyers," for $500. As before, i give you the name of the lawyer, you tell me who was fucking 'em.
Casca is in the lead with $1200, Victor and Trevor have $1100 each, Phil has $500, Skippy and D-Rod have $400 each, Jasen has $300, Ken and Kyle have $200 each. Incredibly, the two Daily Doubles still haven't been found.
Posted by: annika at
07:07 AM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ding!
Who was Lucy Mercer?
Posted by: Trevor at August 05, 2005 07:27 AM (RwZxT)
2
Shit Trevor. i thought that would be harder. You have control.
Posted by: annika T. at August 05, 2005 07:52 AM (Ewg9A)
3
Annie:
Trevor must sleep with his hand on the button and the other on Annika's Journal full time.
This could have been for $50, since it was simply whoever had a shot first.
Since I am but an occasional guesser, it is not worth a complaint, but were I a judge, I'd have written this one off.
The other guys competing for the free mug (I already have one) should be pissed.
Posted by: shelly at August 05, 2005 07:56 AM (6mUkl)
4
Who said anything about a free mug?
This is for bragging rights!
Posted by: annika T. at August 05, 2005 08:04 AM (Ewg9A)
5
Actually, Shelly, I don't think I even started answering until 1/2 way through. I'm on a hot streak, what can I say? Although being on the east coast, and starting work early, I probably didn't have much competition for being first on this one. And to even further push the notion that luck is involved, I'd never even heard of Ms. Mercer until last week.
Annika, in lieu of braggin rights, how about another pizza post?
Oh, and I'll take fash-ism for $300, please.
Posted by: Trevor at August 05, 2005 09:15 AM (RwZxT)
Posted by: Casca at August 05, 2005 09:18 AM (9Hisd)
7
BTW, when did FDR ever practice law?
Posted by: Casca at August 05, 2005 09:19 AM (9Hisd)
8
While FDR never finished Columbia Law School, he passed the bar and practiced corporate law at Carter, Ledyard and Milburn on Wall Street. Like his idol, Woodrow Wilson, FDR never really liked law practice and quit to enter politics.
btw, i would have also accepted as a correct response Princess Martha of Norway. i just have a hunch that they did it.
Posted by: annika T. at August 05, 2005 01:57 PM (zDFsr)
9
...and I've been on vacation for a week, and have pretty much missed out on everything. I did sneak one (wrong) answer in, though. Logged in via dialup at juuuust the right moment.
Posted by: Victor at August 05, 2005 05:31 PM (l+W8Z)
10
See, if I had started this from the beginning I'd have been a contender. When's the new game begin?
Posted by: Rodger Schlong at August 06, 2005 06:23 AM (OezYV)
11
all is not lost, Rodger, there are still two daily doubles left.
Posted by: annika T. at August 06, 2005 09:42 AM (qBVjN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 04, 2005
Jeopardy With annika, Round 21
The category is "Fuckin' Lawyers," for $300. As before, i give you the name of the lawyer, you tell me who was fucking 'em.
Victor and Trevor are tied for the lead with $1100 each, Casca has $900, Phil has $500, Skippy and D-Rod have $400 each, Jasen has $300, Ken and Kyle have $200 each. Amazingly, the two Daily Doubles still haven't been found.
Posted by: annika at
06:05 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
1
DING!
Who is Boris Becker?
Posted by: Mark at August 04, 2005 06:18 PM (Vg0tt)
Posted by: annika trebek at August 04, 2005 06:20 PM (FPa+h)
3
Ding!
Who is Susan Day?
Posted by: Trevor at August 04, 2005 06:32 PM (GtBBB)
4
DING!
Who is every divorcee who crossed his threshold, and his ugly secretary?
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 07:02 PM (qBTBH)
5
Fuck Mark, you made Gin and Tonic, mostly gin, come out my nose!
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 07:03 PM (qBTBH)
6
nice job, Casca. You pick.
Posted by: annika trebek at August 04, 2005 07:07 PM (FPa+h)
7
Make it Fuckin' Lawyers for five.
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 07:12 PM (qBTBH)
8
P.S. I'm still right about that Clinton question!
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 07:13 PM (qBTBH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Prediction
With the New York Times now
"investigating" Judge Roberts' adoption records for the two Latin American children he and his wife adopted, how long do you think it will take for the Times to announce that they have found "irregularities."
My headline prediction: "Childrens Rights Groups Urge Probe Into Special Treatment On Roberts Adoptions."
Everything is proceeding according to the plan i warned you about: Dems hold up the nomination with delaying tactics while the media digs for dirt.
Posted by: annika at
02:05 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You probably won't find someone more suspicious of MSM than me. Nonetheless, this shocked me. This isn't just a new low, this should be scandalous. But of course I doubt it will be. A few right-leaning outlets and blogs will stir up their readers/viewers, but no non-Fox outlet in the MSM and only a few left-leaning blogs will speak out. The march will go on, and the descent of journalistic standards will continue to plunge to disgraceful depths. When an entire section of the population has no shame, there will never be common decency.
Posted by: Trevor at August 04, 2005 02:46 PM (GtBBB)
2
Meanwhile, the phones of all his old girlfriends and anyone who's ever worked for him are suddenly ringing off the hook, i bet.
Posted by: annika at August 04, 2005 04:14 PM (zAOEU)
3
You could start a contest. Name the next low of the left, and win a fabulous prize. Will they question his son's sexuality? Will they connect him to an organization bent on ruling the world known only by it's front the Federalist Society?
Posted by: Trevor at August 04, 2005 04:38 PM (GtBBB)
4
I can see the MSM cameras documenting the authorities tearing the children away from Robert's outstretched arms.
And everyone on the left in fits with a maniacal laugh. I am ashamed that I live in the same country as filth like the NYT.
Posted by: Jake at August 04, 2005 06:32 PM (r/5D/)
5
I'm not surprised. Gotta outdo the Washington Post, which criticized what the kids wore at the White House photo-op.
Next up: Critics ask why the kids aint more "ethnic".
Posted by: Ron at August 04, 2005 07:09 PM (judbW)
6
I watched the Fri night Fox "Round Table" w/Britt Hume. Hume said NYT sought advice of lawyers re: how to unseal and look @ adoption records. This is a definitive step beyond the NYT claim: "We were just asking questions, checking background info, nothing to see here..."
I think its unethical for NYT even to ask questions which are designed to uncover adoption irregularities. Even if Roberts used "powerful person influence" to push through the adoption of his children - its not a story. First, b/c children are involved - which makes it a disgusting exercise. Second, b/c its dog bites man. Using whatever power and influence you have in life is not a story.
Posted by: gcotharn at August 05, 2005 09:33 AM (rkq1p)
7
aaah, gcotharn, but they can
make it a story. That's the idea.
No, you're right, it is unethical. look what the LAT did to schwarzenegger. Bawdy behavior on a movie set? That's dog bites man too. The LA Times went around and interviewed all these women who worked on his movies until they found one who was willing to lie about being groped. When she was proven to be a liar, they didn't report it. Then they totally ignored the women who worked for Gray Davis who said that he threw stuff at them and was verbally abusive.
If the NYT gets into the adoption paperwork, odds are even that they will find something they can spin into an irregularity. It doesn't matter what the truth is, the accusation is enough.
Posted by: annika at August 05, 2005 02:18 PM (zDFsr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Cornet Chop Suey
Today is Louis Armstrong's birthday.

Don't forget to listen to a Louis Armstrong song today.
Posted by: annika at
08:12 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Satchmo!!

My favorite, and I'm probably not the only one here, is "What a Wonderful World."
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at August 04, 2005 12:26 PM (kxatG)
2
Thanks for the reminder Annika. And Amy, you should check out his stuff from the 20s and 30s. "What A Wonderful World" is okay, but he's not really showing off his true skill--wailing on that trumpet--in that particular song. Tight Like This, Basin Street Blues, Saint Louis Blues, West End Blues.
God, now I sound like one of those assinine jazz guys who claims that you can only listen to jazz on vinyl and that Ken Burns is a tool. Well, just for the record, all my jazz is on CD and I think the Ken Burns doc was cool. I'm also a sucker for Armstrong's duets with Ella Fitzgerald--and real jazz snobs wouldn't own up to that (too 'commercial'... translation: too accessible)
Posted by: ken at August 04, 2005 03:56 PM (xD5ND)
3
I dunno what it is about that song, but it just seems to make my eyes well up. I'll dig further.
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at August 04, 2005 04:38 PM (kR4Xi)
4
Well, Hello Dolly! Actually, there is nothing better than his 1930's version of La Vie En Rose.
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 05:48 PM (qBTBH)
5
I support listening to a Louis Armstrong song every day.
Posted by: irishlass at August 08, 2005 06:36 PM (s/na6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 03, 2005
Jeopardy With annie, Round 20
The category is "Fuckin' Lawyers," for $200. As before, i give you the name of the lawyer, you tell me who was fucking 'em.
Victor is in the lead with $1100, Casca and Trevor have $900 each, Phil has $500, Skippy and D-Rod have $400 each, Jasen has $300, Ken and Kyle have $200 each. Amazingly, the two Daily Doubles still haven't been found.
Trevor has shown after just two rounds that this is still anyone's game. So join in if you haven't yet.
Posted by: annika at
05:47 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Who is Elizabeth Ward Gracen?
Do I only get one guess? I could've also chosen the Arkansas State Bar, too.
Posted by: skippystalin at August 03, 2005 06:02 PM (ruCNe)
2
The AstroTurf salesmans' daughter.
Posted by: EJD at August 03, 2005 06:39 PM (95uDn)
3
Ding.
Who was Gennifer Flowers?
Posted by: Trevor at August 03, 2005 06:55 PM (GtBBB)
4
i hate to be a stickler here, but if you don't use the signaling device, there's no way for the judges to know if you are a contestant or just some yahoo shouting out answers from the audience. Not that i don't encourage that kind of thing, but hey, rules are rules.
Posted by: annika trebek at August 03, 2005 06:56 PM (Ors1M)
5
Trevor, way to hit that button! You have given one of the over 1400 correct responses to this clue. You may now pick the next category.
Posted by: annika trebek at August 03, 2005 07:06 PM (Ors1M)
6
So many jokes... don't know where... to begin. Between knowing that the answer wasn't Hillary and your compliment on button-pushing I'm overloaded.
Let's stick with fuckin' lawyers for $300, please.
Posted by: Trevor at August 03, 2005 07:20 PM (GtBBB)
7
Some of us have lost interest. Clearly, this game is fixed. The answer to who's fucking Bill Clinton is "Who isn't".
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 12:00 AM (qBTBH)
Posted by: Mark at August 04, 2005 12:10 AM (EKHuS)
9
AND, by the fucking way, if one is disbarred is one still a "lawyer"? You're talking politicians here. I'm thinking this should be about those who stand before the bar.
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 06:36 AM (qBTBH)
10
Casca, if you notice, I pointed out a woman that f'd Bill before he was disbarred, and nowhere did Annika say he had to currently be a lawyer.
Posted by: Trevor at August 04, 2005 07:19 AM (RwZxT)
11
Gee-awd, Casca is a crybaby. And his answer is still wrong, because neither annika nor myself has fucked, or been fucked by (at least literally) Bill Clinton.
(I also notice Casca has not denied having sex with that jackass, Mr. Clinton.)
Posted by: Victor at August 04, 2005 08:37 AM (cguGy)
12
Ding!
Who is the man who has progressed to fucking the people of the world by allowing Tsunami Relief Funds under his watch to be siphoned off by terrorists?
Am I too late?
Posted by: gcotharn at August 04, 2005 08:42 AM (3Bn47)
13
ROFLMAO, one glance over the category and the answer (not to mention the comments) and I cant_stop_laughing. You people are too funny.
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at August 04, 2005 12:30 PM (kxatG)
14
Victor is clearly still smarting over my observations of his lack of a life, sex or otherwise. I'll state the same for the ponsy twat Trevor.
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 05:54 PM (qBTBH)
15
If there were any real judges in this kangaroo court world we live in, I'd appeal this decision. My answer is easily the most correct.
Posted by: Casca at August 04, 2005 05:57 PM (qBTBH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jeopardy With Annie, Round 19
The category is "People annika Would Like To Meet," for $400. Victor is in the lead with $1100, Casca has $900, Phil and Trevor have $500 each, Skippy and D-Rod have $400 each, Jasen has $300, Ken and Kyle have $200 each. Neither of the two Daily Doubles has been found yet.
Posted by: annika at
07:47 AM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
?????
DONG!
What is fuck noooooooooooo?!
Posted by: reagan80 at August 03, 2005 07:59 AM (h2z2l)
2
*BUZZZ*
What is "Fuck Helen Hunt"?
Posted by: Spanky at August 03, 2005 08:04 AM (h2z2l)
3
*buzzz*
Who is Al Michaels?
Posted by: Victor at August 03, 2005 08:10 AM (9y/nk)
Posted by: Trevor at August 03, 2005 08:12 AM (RwZxT)
5
Bzzzz
Who is Goldie Hawn?
Posted by: Sub-Human at August 03, 2005 08:19 AM (aklAt)
Posted by: Stalin Penetrated Me at August 03, 2005 09:07 AM (h2z2l)
7
WHIZZ!
Who is Joe Don Baker?
Posted by: Tubgirl Is Hot at August 03, 2005 09:09 AM (h2z2l)
8
good guesses, but Trevor has the correct response again. Go choose, dude.
Posted by: annika trebek at August 03, 2005 09:25 AM (zAOEU)
9
This is unbelievable. I saw Cher in San Diego on her final final tour two years ago.
Trevor is on a roll!
Posted by: d-rod at August 03, 2005 09:34 AM (xmskQ)
10
"Entertainer" was the kicker. Not singer, not actor, but someone that could do it all.
Just when I get on a roll, I have to actually go do some work. I guess I'll go with Fuckin' Lawyers for $200, please.
btw, this really is fun. Thanks.
Posted by: Trevor at August 03, 2005 09:36 AM (RwZxT)
11
OMG! Cher, she was overated even when she was popular! You and my sister, both Cher freaks.
ackk!
Posted by: Kyle at August 03, 2005 12:32 PM (H5KE9)
12
These categories blow.
Posted by: Jason O. at August 03, 2005 01:40 PM (2CAKL)
Posted by: Mark at August 03, 2005 04:55 PM (Vg0tt)
14
I know, wtf could she be thinking? Just when you think that you've finally found a gal with all her shit in one bag.
Posted by: Casca at August 03, 2005 05:02 PM (qBTBH)
15
I recall the old Tom and Jerry cartoon where Tom, upon getting his ass beat by a rodent, announces (with a stadium echo):
"DOOOONNN CHUUU BELIEVE ETT."
Posted by: Mark at August 03, 2005 05:13 PM (Vg0tt)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday Is Poetry Day: Hardy
An August night and bugs. Sounds like Sacramento to me.
An August Midnight
I
A shaded lamp and a waving blind,
And the beat of a clock from a distant floor:
On this scene enter — winged, horned, and spined —
A longlegs, a moth, and a dumbledore;
While 'mid my page there idly stands
A sleepy fly, that rubs its hands . . .
II
Thus meet we five, in this still place,
At this point of time, at this point in space.
- My guests besmear my new-penned line,
Or bang at the lamp and fall supine.
"God's humblest, they!" I muse. Yet why?
They know Earth-secrets that know not I.
By Thomas Hardy.
Posted by: annika at
12:19 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 126 words, total size 1 kb.
August 02, 2005
American Beauty vs. The Ice Storm

American Beauty and The Ice Storm are essentially the same movie. Through the magic of the Netflix queue, i saw them both on subsequent nights.
Both are about dysfunctional families, mid-life crisis, sexual restlessness, infidelity, teen experimentation, and the secret underbelly of suburban life.
The difference is that one sucked and one was a pretty decent movie. Unfortunately, the Academy bestowed its Best Picture award on the one that sucked. Shows you that the Academy Awards are a joke.
A big reason for the difference was that one movie was about its subject matter, while the other was a thinly veiled political statement in which the subject matter was only a setup for the filmmaker's liberal punch-line.
Ang Lee treated his characters with gentle compassion. The other director had a huge chip on his shoulder against every character except one. American Beauty was the product of a bitter, angry, small mind. If you want my advice, pass it up and rent The Ice Storm.
Update: Perhaps i should be more specific about my objections, since it never occurred to me that anyone would disagree with my opinions on any subject [insert winking smilie here], especially someone whose opinions i respect as much as Professor Schwyzer.
It seems to me that the central villain of American Beauty is the one dimensional homophobe character, and i was a little taken aback by the over-the-top stereotype, which the writer employed to get his point across. The character of Colonel Frank Fitts, United States Marine Corps seems intended as an insult directed solely at conservatives. Here's a caricature with a crew-cut, who speaks with a southern accent, is obviously a Republican, a retired marine, an abusive husband, probably a batterer who beats up his drug dealer son and requires a monthly piss test from him. He's also a closet Nazi. But the big punch-line i alluded to — the "Crying Game moment" if you will — is when the villain, in a fit of emotion, kisses the Kevin Spacey character. The filmmaker's message to the audience is clear: all conservatives are homophobes and all homophobes are repressed homosexuals.
While i admit that some homophobes probably are repressed homosexuals (J. Edgar Hoover, and at least one of Matthew Shepard's killers for example), i have a hard time with a movie whose intent is so obviously to smear the military and conservatives the way American Beauty did. i'm very sensitive to political statements which are designed to insult not persuade, and which are disguised as art. Some have called me too sensitive, but it's no secret that liberal Hollywood filmmakers are often motivated by their hatred of Republicans. Witness this quote from an interview with Jay Chandrasekhar, who directed this year's remake movie, The Dukes of Hazzard:
You know, IÂ’m a very liberal-minded person and I like to tweak Republicans whenever possible.
Great. Just great. Love that honesty. When Hollywood realizes that it's continually pissing off one half of it's potential audience for no good reason, that's the day they'll stop whining about declining box office receipts.
Posted by: annika at
10:37 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 518 words, total size 4 kb.
1
have you seen "Sideways"?
Posted by: nikita demosthenes at August 03, 2005 12:15 AM (Y3Wne)
2
"The product of an angry bitter small mind." Well that would explain most of the movies that came out recently.
Posted by: Kyle at August 03, 2005 04:18 AM (H5KE9)
3
I felt the same way when viewing Dominick and Eugene vs Rainman. The former was a far better movie but the critics went for the latter.
Posted by: Gavin at August 03, 2005 05:28 AM (7nNQe)
4
When my friend and I left the theater after seeing
American Beauty we were both very disappointed. I suggested that he rent
The Ice Storm. I described it as "the movie that
American Beauty wanted to be." That pretty much sums it up...
Posted by: Jerry at August 03, 2005 06:25 AM (Fu53G)
Posted by: annika at August 03, 2005 07:07 AM (Gvw6n)
6
Never, Annie, have I disagreed with you more. I still use excerpts from American Beauty in my "men and masculinity" class... it's (IMHO) the best American film with a middle-aged male central character of the last decade, with "Lost In Translation" a close second.
Posted by: Hugo Schwyzer at August 03, 2005 01:33 PM (qldcl)
7
Hugo - I have a lot of respect for you in most every situation - except for your math skills, because you can't count out 5-7-5 for shit!
Nevertheless, wtf are you teaching those guys!? You've already got a bunch of guys who are sensitive enough that they enroll in a "Men and Masculinity" class, and now you are holding those two characters as people to emulate!? Your students are ALREADY too much into thinking about themselves and being sensitive! YOUR students need more action + less naval gazing.
I'll grant you that both characters made admirable personal journeys during those films - but I want my son to emulate them in very limited ways.
Those characters never had to be as broken as they were. They never had to be as inactive as they were. Those guys were lost men, raised by weak or absent fathers, wandering through a permissive society without a manly code they believed in. They were virtual spectators in their own lives.
Its wonderful that they discovered aspects of their own manly code during those films - but, still, its tragic that they had to virtually wreck their adult lives before they did so. When your class is exalting certain aspects of these characters, it should also be noting the waste and tragedy of the aimless, inactive, unfocused, codeless, unspiritual, selfish, and - I can't think of the other word - its something in the heathenous/hedonistic family.
YOUR students need a lot more Teddy and Franklin Roosevelt, and A LOT LESS Kevin Spacey and Bill Murray characters(though I do like the actual Bill Murray pretty well.)
Since I'm already pretentiously telling you how to teach, there's no sense backing off now: I recommend this blog for your students:
www.kimdutoit.com
I've met Kim du Toit. He's one of the most intelligent, sensitive, personable, confident, filled with zest, MANLY men I've ever met. Kim du Toit knows how to be masculine.
Posted by: gcotharn at August 03, 2005 03:43 PM (Rhyyb)
8
lol, the day Hugo starts quoting Kim du Toit to his students, better look out for pigs overhead.
That was a good one, gcotharn.
Posted by: annika at August 03, 2005 06:01 PM (Ors1M)
9
Thanks for the clarification, Annie; gcotharn, I'll check out Kim.
For what it's worth, though I love Chris Cooper, I never "bought" his character in the film. And as far as making a hero out of the Spacey character, I mean a hero in the classical sense: A flawed man on a journey that will ultimately result in his own death, but only after he has been transformed. Not necessarily as a role model!
And yet, I tend to take a lot of mulligans with haiku!
Posted by: Hugo Schwyzer at August 04, 2005 10:48 AM (qldcl)
10
Rather than "tweaking" Republicans, Mr. Jay should have worked on tweaking his film so that it didn't suck a goat's ass.
Posted by: Mark at August 07, 2005 02:15 PM (PjRZw)
11
Some libertarians and Objectivists have enjoyed AMERICAN BEAUTY as the story of a man discovering his authentic self and asserting his individuality. I know I enjoyed watching Spacey telling pretty much everyone to get bent, and when I came into a bunch of money, as he did, I enjoyed buying what I damn well pleased and announcing, "I rule!" Didn't mess with any underage girls, though.
Posted by: Bilwick at August 09, 2005 09:08 AM (AktpP)
12
i have a hard time with a movie whose intent is so obviously to smear the military and conservatives the way American Beauty did.
*yawn*
The homophobe-as-closet-case is a pretty stock character. Was American Beauty lazy to employ it? Yeah. Is it some shocking twist? If you avoid all culture, or live in a cave, I suppose you could claim to be shocked.
Posted by: jpe at August 09, 2005 12:37 PM (AoyVe)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jeopardy With annika, Round 18
The category is "Places That Suck," for $500. Victor is in the lead with $1100, Casca has $900, Phil has $500, Skippy and D-Rod have $400 each, Jasen has $300, Ken and Kyle have $200 each. Neither of the two Daily Doubles has been found yet.
Posted by: annika at
07:16 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"Ding"
What are the new helvetia housing complex in Sacremento?
Posted by: wayne at August 02, 2005 07:26 PM (VPgv/)
2
the judges ruling is no.
Posted by: annika trebek at August 02, 2005 07:30 PM (VcoXY)
3
Ding!
What is NOT the New Helvetia housing complex in Sacremento?
Posted by: Casca at August 02, 2005 07:34 PM (qBTBH)
4
What am I doing copying Wayne's spelling, sheesh, Sacramento.
Posted by: Casca at August 02, 2005 07:37 PM (qBTBH)
5
Hey! I live in California, I'm supposed to know how to spell the capitol, too?
;-)
We are the knights who say NEE
Posted by: Wayne at August 02, 2005 07:52 PM (mDbn6)
6
BZZZZZ
What is sorority row?
Posted by: shelly at August 02, 2005 07:58 PM (pO1tP)
7
BZZZ!!
What is buck futter?
Posted by: Scof at August 02, 2005 08:49 PM (4P1HE)
8
All I know is that it's a sordid age we live in where a pretty young blogger can say "nee" at will to her readers.
Posted by: Publicola at August 02, 2005 10:03 PM (5T3kX)
Posted by: annika at August 02, 2005 10:12 PM (FmH7/)
10
Who's the chick in the banner doing the strip tease?
Posted by: Mark at August 02, 2005 10:29 PM (rAsTq)
11
^^^^^^^
What is "New Switzerland" (aka Sacratomato)?
Posted by: d-rod at August 02, 2005 11:34 PM (ITB3g)
12
The judge's ruling is no.
Posted by: annika trebek at August 02, 2005 11:39 PM (FmH7/)
13
Buzz.
What is Sutter's Fort?
Posted by: James at August 03, 2005 04:48 AM (blfs0)
14
Bzzz
What is Sacramento?
There's a pattern in here somewhere.
Posted by: Trevor at August 03, 2005 05:37 AM (RwZxT)
15
Bzzzz
What is River Oaks Service Center (I don't have a problem with alcohol, I can quit anytime).
Posted by: Sub-Human at August 03, 2005 06:25 AM (yTuVc)
16
"DING"
What is Cafe Melange?
Posted by: Wayne at August 03, 2005 06:49 AM (djVNl)
17
BZZZZ
What is Monterey?
Posted by: Phil at August 03, 2005 06:50 AM (HFzU8)
18
What is the Arial font?
Posted by: Kin at August 03, 2005 06:59 AM (FPO9K)
19
Err...
Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!
What is the Arial Font?
Posted by: Kin at August 03, 2005 07:00 AM (FPO9K)
20
No no no. i like Verdana font, Kin. Arial is so Windows 95.
Anyways, Trevor has the correct response, and gets to pick the next category!
Posted by: annika trebek at August 03, 2005 07:13 AM (Gvw6n)
21
DONG!
What is Platres, Cyprus?
Posted by: reagan80 at August 03, 2005 07:18 AM (h2z2l)
22
I'd like to go with:
people Annika would like to meet
for $400, please.
Posted by: Trevor at August 03, 2005 07:22 AM (RwZxT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Flip-Flops In The News Again
Wearing
flip-flops for certain occasions is not only something that
can get you in trouble, it can also get you killed!
Or maybe just seriously injured.
Posted by: annika at
09:16 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I wore sandals to work on casual friday recently. I will never do that again. I could feel the stares and when I told friends they laughed at me for ruining my career. What's the big deal! Its shoes!
Posted by: Scof at August 02, 2005 09:42 AM (7z8ua)
2
Anyone who wears in public the flip-flops you linked to, deserves death by the fashion police.
Posted by: Jake at August 02, 2005 12:20 PM (r/5D/)
Posted by: Jake at August 02, 2005 12:38 PM (r/5D/)
4
annika, this is old news. You, of ALL people, should be reading Manolo daily.
Posted by: Victor at August 02, 2005 02:48 PM (D3m1Z)
5
Heh, I just got done spending $70 at Nordstroms for a sequined pair for my daughter. Sheesh, we're spinning down the vortex of the decline of Western Civilization.
Posted by: Casca at August 02, 2005 06:07 PM (qBTBH)
6
BTW, there's a blurb in todays paper about a guy who got sucked over Vernal Falls at Yosemite. Seems the idiot went beyond the barrier cable on the path, and may have been swimming above the falls. Possible honorable mention Darwin Award candidate.
Posted by: Casca at August 02, 2005 06:19 PM (qBTBH)
7
You have to die to get the Darwin Award (It is for helping refine the species)
Did he?
Even so, it can't compete with the guys who use .38 shells for fuses, etc.
Posted by: shelly at August 02, 2005 08:02 PM (pO1tP)
8
Meghan Gurdon at National Review covered Northwestern U's championship lacrosse team, which went to the White House to meet the President. Some of the members went in flip flops.
Some people are pure idiots.
Posted by: Mark at August 02, 2005 10:36 PM (rAsTq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hans Island Fight
i think you all know who's side i'm taking in
this controversy.
Posted by: annika at
12:49 AM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I just hope we notify the United Nations before anyone does anything. You know, "global tests" or something.
Posted by: Mark at August 02, 2005 02:12 AM (GVB1B)
2
My money is on Denmark. They ought to have a beer brew off to settle the dispute.
I volunteer to be an impartial judge.
Posted by: Kyle at August 02, 2005 03:39 AM (H5KE9)
3
This is unbelievable. The island just looks Canadian so it should go to Canada.
Simple.
Posted by: d-rod at August 02, 2005 05:59 AM (egNZz)
4
What are they gonna do? Have a slap fight?
Posted by: ken at August 02, 2005 07:41 AM (xD5ND)
5
I dunno about Denmark winning the brew off, there are some exceptionally good Belgian Style Beers that are brewed in Canada. Then again not everyone is in to Belgian Style Beers.
The other thing about this land dispute....no buses have been blow up.
Posted by: the Pirate at August 02, 2005 08:27 AM (SksyN)
6
i think its best to let the island belong to the people of the nations... dang! due to blobal warming countries are fighting for the north... lines are being drawn! that is why there's this dispure over a tiny island like Hans!!!
Posted by: maizzy at August 02, 2005 08:40 AM (t5V9d)
7
No, Pirate, but Garry Busey has blown up. Have you seen that dude lately? He must be like 300 lbs.
Posted by: annika at August 02, 2005 09:01 AM (FCQ/B)
8
If this comes down to a vote the Danes would automatically win one demographic. Any man who's been to Danmark and seen the women is not going to pick Canada.
Posted by: Trevor at August 02, 2005 09:42 AM (RwZxT)
9
I second Trevor's comments:
http://www.troniu.dk/index.php?c=1042
Posted by: Scof at August 02, 2005 09:47 AM (7z8ua)
10
Last time I saw Busey, other than on thesmokinggun.com, was the show on comedy central, where was fat and batshit crazy.
Posted by: the Pirate at August 02, 2005 10:57 AM (SksyN)
11
Annika, thank you for linking to us at Independent Sources. We simply cannot get off this incredibly fast paced, high action drama...CRISIS in the ARCTIC!
Posted by: Insider at August 02, 2005 11:35 AM (m9bOd)
12
Maybe they could, like, have a hockey game between two national teams to settle it, eh?
Posted by: tdothen at August 02, 2005 04:59 PM (sxki2)
13
I've known Busey since 1982 and he was certifiable then. Crazy is not new to him.
Nor is bloat. However, he looks recently like he's sucking on an air hose or something.
I sat next to him at the House of Blues ;ast year and he took up two stools, no kidding.
Out of work actors are dangerous to themselves...
But, he does play mean drums, under the name of Teddy Jack Eddy.
Posted by: shelly at August 02, 2005 08:09 PM (pO1tP)
Posted by: Mark at August 02, 2005 10:27 PM (rAsTq)
15
Shelly, you are one interesting guy.
Posted by: annie at August 02, 2005 10:46 PM (FmH7/)
16
To Kyle and the Pirat
Danes has created the worlds first open source beer (Our Beer). http://www.voresoel.dk/main.php?id=70
Doesn't that speen in our favour?
Posted by: Bubbling Minds at August 03, 2005 06:52 AM (6YJOJ)
17
My money is on Denmark, my homecountry. Wouldn't it be ironic though, if the island disappears by itself in a few years due to global warming and rising sealevels?
Posted by: Erik at August 06, 2005 02:10 AM (YQMeR)
18
Regarding global warming, see Bjorn Lomborg's "The Skeptical Environmentalist."
Posted by: Mark at August 07, 2005 02:18 PM (PjRZw)
19
I have actually read that book... seems like we have (almost) nothing to worry about...
Posted by: Erik at August 08, 2005 06:02 AM (UJE1d)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Live Blogging Al Gore's Appearance On Leno
Waiting for Gore. Leno's doing the "dumb ads" thingie. Not too good tonight.
Leno is marking time until retirement. He's just not into his job anymore and it shows.
Here comes Al, dressed like Belzer. All in black. And that same Paul Simon song as his intro theme. The singer, not the late senator.
Gawd i hate that man's voice. He's fat too.
Oh hell, look at those boots. Patent leather cowboy boots. What a fucking fashion disaster.
He's still bitter too. "You win some, you lose some, and then there's that third category." Yuk yuk, same old sense of humor, Al. Nonexistent.
Trying to kiss up to Leno by saying how great Johnny was might not be such a good idea. Should have done your homework, Al.
Commercial.
Leno: "That famous misquote. . . You never said you invented the internet." Heh.
Another lame recount joke by Al.
Now he's plugging Current, his new cable channel. So far his appearance has been as boring as this post.
So his channel will have a show where you can find out the top subjects being searched on the internet. Wow, how original. Yahoo's been doing that for like five years now.
Al's wedding ring needs to be re-sized. He's got the sausage fingers.
Note to guys: short sleeves with a black blazer and gold buttons look cheesy.
Film clip from something on Current: parachutists jumping off a cliff. Okay, hasn't National Geographic Explorer been doing that shit for years too?
Two segments and he's out. Becuz he's a busy guy. What a snoozefest.
Man that dude's got a big ass.
Posted by: annika at
12:17 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 283 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Hey Annika, that was my first reading of live blogging..excellent.
Just got back from SF where i took my 13 year old daughter and her guitarist (12) to see Vendetta Red, a Seattle band. Cafe Du Nord. Very cool. Met the band, shot photos. I'm burnt now, and reading about Al Gore reusing that stupid "Third Category" "joke" was about all my mind can handle now.
and yeah, fuck Savage.. can barely handle his show these days.
Posted by: LC Fresh Sign at August 02, 2005 01:17 AM (r9yT/)
2
I am very grateful that Al Gore is providing a much needed outlet for liberal viewpoints and politics. Certainly no other network would ever devote time to liberalism.
Posted by: Mark at August 02, 2005 02:04 AM (GVB1B)
3
I actually tried to watch this abortion of a network for a while. There was this guy running around New york with these little stickers, putting them on everything. He talked about his girlfriends, and then there was this weird girl with a cat, talking about a movie whe saw.
God, It was more boring than wathing the ticker tape on CNBC.
Posted by: Kyle at August 02, 2005 03:37 AM (H5KE9)
4
Goddammit, Annika.
Don't ever post anything---live or otherwise---about Al Gore and his show. Unless it's of the untimely death (the show's death people!)
I'm half-way through a large cup'a joe, and I have a pretty good blog-surfing buzz going...and then SMACK, I run straight into this buzz kill of a post/topic.
Don't EVER do that again. At least not so early in the morning.
Posted by: Robbie at August 02, 2005 07:48 AM (AoFMn)
5
While you are visually correct about Al's ass, you are technically incorrect. He doesn't have a *big* ass, he is **all** ass.
Posted by: Becker at August 02, 2005 09:56 AM (Nlp5A)
6
Count your blessings folks, this man could have been the leader of the free world.
Thank God for Flori-Duh and us getting 100% of the black vote on the Supreme Court of the United States.
Who says the Supreme Court shouldn't be the final arbiter of everything?
Not me. They saved our asses. Don't forget it.
And, it's gonna get better. Just watch.
Now imagine Gore's picks.
Sweet dreams...
Posted by: shelly at August 02, 2005 08:17 PM (pO1tP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
120kb generated in CPU 0.0465, elapsed 0.0657 seconds.
39 queries taking 0.0334 seconds, 274 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.