March 24, 2006
Bad Move
I loved the book
Reagan's War, by Peter Schweizer. It tells the story of Reagan's lifelong commitment to anti-communism. The most striking thing about Reagan's foreign policy was the breadth of his offensive against the Eastern Bloc. It wasn't just the overt moves: the arms race, SDI, the summits. He put a lot of resources into more subtle efforts to encourage democracy, most notably support for Poland's Solidarity movement. He also revitalized the Voice of America, which had lost sight of its original purpose as a propaganda tool.
No serious person doubts that Reagan's multi-pronged offensive worked. We should be using the same combination of threats, negotiation and propaganda against Iran. But Congress doesn't see it that way, as reported by ThreatsWatch:
From the House Committee on Appropriations comes word of the failure to fully fund the $75M requested by the administration to assist in broadcast/ telecast/ satellite communication efforts into the people of Iran."Promotion of Democracy in Iran - The committee did not fund the $75 million requested by the Administration for the promotion of democracy in Iran because it was poorly justified. Instead, $56 million was provided through proven, existing programs that will have an immediate, positive impact on the fostering of democratic ideals in Iran."
. . .
The $75M was not enough and, as it was, decades late in the game. To see Congress slash the belated efforts by nearly one-third out of the gate, in light of the current urgency, borders on disconcerting.Sometimes I suspect that there are folks in Congress who are not just clueless, but actively working to harm the people who elected them.
The Iranian problem is a very tough one, and we're in a situation which requires a creative solution. Of all the options available to us, encouraging regime change from within Iran is the least unattractive, in my opinion. Thus, I don't think now is the time to be skimping on resources devoted to that end.
Posted by: annika at
09:17 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 328 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Congress is a whorehouse, and each gal is trying to have a big night. Real programs are secondary to the self-interest of 90% of the people on the hill.
The analogous relationship between the cold war, and the war on terror is remarkable. Dubyah is consciously being Reagan.
Posted by: Casca at March 24, 2006 09:33 AM (y9m6I)
2
I think that Bush has tried to use Reagan as a model but has not been as effective in many areas. He simply doesn't bring the same set of political tools to the game. Annika's post illustrates an example: the propoganda war. It should be noted, however, that the admin's attempts to utilize propoganda in Iraq have been met with very harsh criticism from the MSM and the political Left (in one of the most disgusting and pathetically obvious displays of hypocrisy.) I am not old enough to remember whether the MSM attacked Voice of America. Even if they did, I doubt it was done with the same gusto. We are dealing now with a MSM that actively works against US interests and in many ways lends aid and comfort to terroists and world terroism by purposely reporting half-truths and refusing to acknowledge that there are good guys and bad guys in the War on Terror.
Posted by: Blu at March 24, 2006 10:13 AM (j8oa6)
3
When you are approving propaganda type activity, you don't want to be too specific about the details. It's ironic that
this is where the House draws the line on spending. And depressing.
Posted by: gcotharn at March 24, 2006 11:00 AM (3Sbj7)
4
Annie -
I'm a believer Congress fails to live up to its Section I, Article 8 responsibilities frequently; however, did you read what the Administration is actually proposing to do with the 75M?
The State Department would use $50 million of the supplemental funds, if they are approved by Congress, to establish around-the-clock satellite television and radio broadcasts into Iran. An additional $15 million would go to support the development of civic organizations within Iran. Iranian students and professionals who wish to visit the United States would benefit from an additional $5 million in funding for exchange programs. Finally, the department would devote an additional $5 million to public diplomacy efforts aimed at Iran, including its Persian language Web site.
The State Department official indicated that the United States is not planning to work with existing nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Iran because, as she said, they all have been infiltrated by government agents.
Yes, I'm sure they'll point to how effective other programs have been in latin america..or how easy to jam those broadcasts are. The same statement/briefing on Sec Rice's proposal included the following, "the United States already has programs in place supporting Iranian labor unions, dissidents and human rights activists. The official said civil society organization is the key to effecting positive change in Iran."
It's an election year so Congress is pretty fast and loose with taxpayer money, especially in the area of "national security"; however, you have to at least make an *effort* to show some coherency in linking ends and ways before asking for resources...
And, are the ways and means to win a war against a secular, state-centric political ideology analogous to defeating a tribal/ethnic/non-state-centric religious one?
Posted by: Col Steve at March 24, 2006 02:57 PM (pj2h7)
5
I had a post along the same lines today, wondering why so many congresscritters are so worried that we are going to be in Iraq forever and not wanting to spend money to see that it's a success.
Jackasses.
I think we should start a campaign to have every incumbent defeated this year, be it in the primary or in the general. Time for some grown ups in Congress.
Posted by: KG at March 24, 2006 07:22 PM (SZsz5)
6
As someone who is old enough to remember the start of the Solidarity movement in Poland I always found it funny that the position of this country was unqualified support. (Actually not funny since I knew that we would have supported genocide if it would have cause the Soviets harm) The US would have the world believe that it was a champion of progressive perhaps revolutionary movements when in fact should similar freedom loving, injustice hating, movements ( think labor unions, civil rights, anti-fascist, pro-choice, gay and lesbian rights) have fomented and gained support within our borders they would be, and in fact have been covertly and overtly crushed. True, many of these movements have prevailed, but only over time because they had the courage and grass roots support to fight the government and the other great entrenched power: Corporate Interest. But much blood was shed along the way.
A labor historian, D. Walkowitz, who was in Poland during that time, when I asked him what was going on over there, likened the Solidarity movement to SDS in conjunction with the Autoworkers, taking over Ford Rouge and maybe some other GM and Chrysler plants and making demands on the White house to increase wages and other work rules.
I wonder how many hours it would have taken for Ronnie to have called out the guard in the name of protecting "National interests" to storm the plant. Hundreds dead, hundreds injured but democracy and the rule of law prevailing.
Now consider RonnieÂ’s outrage had the Polish government done the same?
Now to quote my comrade Blu.....
"In one of the most disgusting and pathetically obvious displays of hypocrisy"
Unfortunately, pathetic, obvious displays of hypocrisy are and have always been the stock and trade of America, and our current president and his criminal cronies have raised the bar to an astounding height. This hypocrisy, which is transparent to the rest of the world, is the reason wherever Americans travel they are met with snickers and pity for the current plague in the Whitehouse. It is the reason also that a propaganda war against the Middle East is futile. In the 50's when access to media and free flowing news was so constricted it was possible that a needed service was provided by Radio Free Europe and the Voice of America. It was also a more innocent time and America had a much less tarnished image. Everybody in the world today, except of course in China, has generally free access to many sources of news so I doubt there is really much value in spending 50 or 75 million to try and convince the secularist of Iran that America is their friend and will lend support should they need it. They know what happened to the Iraqi's who listened to Bush 1.
Casca, as Gore Vidal said, congressmen are just out of work lawyers, fattening their resumes waiting for a better job offer.
Posted by: strawman at March 25, 2006 07:23 AM (0ZdtC)
7
Still crazy after all these years.
Posted by: Casca at March 25, 2006 10:22 PM (2gORp)
8
"He also revitalized the Voice of America, which had lost sight of its original purpose as a propaganda tool."
Once an organizatiog is exposed as a propaganda tool, it loses the trust of the greater portion of the population it intends to influence.
Telling the truth should not be looked upon as a weak, girlie-mon approach, but as a justifiable means to inform. Propaganda is merely a means to distort. That's why the "Office of Strategic [Dis]Information" was destined for the dustbin from the outset.
Posted by: Will at March 27, 2006 11:10 AM (GzvlQ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 18, 2006
The First Annual AJFF: Goldie Hawn, Part Five
Today let's take a look at two of Goldie's action comedies from the mid to late seventies:
The Duchess And The Dirtwater Fox and
Foul Play.
The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox, 1976
Starring Goldie Hawn and George Segal (whom I loved in one of the meanest movies ever, the classic Who's Afraid Of Virginia Woolf?).
The interesting thing about Duchess is how different Goldie's character is from her more timid roles of the early seventies. It seems that her roles had gradually become more assertive with each film, and this one went way off the scale.
The movie opens with Goldie and another chick rolling on the floor in a full-on bitch fight. She talks like a sailor, punches people out, handles a Winchester like a pro, and even flips the middle finger in one scene. A recurrent motif in the film are a couple of embroidered pasties that keep falling out of Goldie's purse at inopportune moments.
Goldie plays a hooker/cabaret dancer in 19th century San Francisco, who's always on the make. Segal plays a small time crook/gambler who's also always on the make. A bag of stolen money brings them together, and as I like to say, hijinx ensue.
At first Goldie doesn't like Segal, who's all hands when they first meet. But then she finds out about the money and plays along until she can steal it from him. He chases her, and a gang of outlaws chases him. Somehow or another Goldie gets mixed up with a band of Mormons on their way to Salt Lake City, including the great Conrad Janis. (I think there's the obligatory shot of a stagecoach going over a cliff, which must be stock footage because I've seen it in so many westerns it's not even funny.)
The comedy is pretty hit or miss, but the funniest scene takes place inside the stagecoach between Goldie and Segal. They're trying to concoct a scheme without Conrad Janis, who's sitting between them, figuring out what they're saying. So they speak in a comical pidgin German that's really well done.
The rest of the movie is kind of juvenile and the situations seem contrived. Goldie realizes she loves the gambler in the middle of a chase scene, while they're pretending to be guests at a jewish wedding. Later, they have sex in a rowboat, before going through the rapids. The bad guys eventually catch up with our heroes and tie them to stakes in the desert.
Finally, everything works out for the best, but I forgot if they get to keep the money or not. Costume-wise, the movie is heavy on red and black. The costume designer must have been a big Stendhal fan, I guess. One highlight of the movie is when Goldie sings a bawdy song called "Please Don't Touch Me Plums" with a bunch of kids, Julie Andrews style. Fans of Bobby Vinton should also like the sappy theme song, "Lemon Drops, Lollipops And Sunbeams."
Consider me not one of Bobby Vinton's fans. Nor am I a big fan of The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox, which I gave two stars on the Neflix scale. Goldie's performance was a standout (she was nominated for a Golden Globe). But the chuckles in this screwball comedy were too few and far between, and couldn't overcome the generally mediocre script.
Foul Play, 1978
This is the first of Goldie's two romantic comedies with co-star Chevy Chase. It's also an homage to the Hitchcock thriller The Man Who Knew Too Much, which is one of my favorites.
Despite his work in the classics Caddyshack, Vacation and Fletch, I've never really warmed up to Chevy Chase. I'm not quite sure why. In Foul Play, he's a San Francisco detective who protects Goldie Hawn from a gang of assassins out to kill the pope. I suppose people thought Chevy was sexy in those days, but he does nothing for me. Still, the romantic scenes between him and Goldie happen to be the most convincing of any movie she'd done so far.
Goldie's part was a complete 180° from her character in Duchess. In Foul Play, Goldie is a 30-something divorcee who's cute but dissillusioned by the dating scene and looking down the barrel of spinsterhood. She actually reminds me a lot of Meg Ryan's character in When Harry Met Sally, even down to the oversized 80's glasses.
There's not much to Goldie's character; she's kind of an everywoman who's only purpose is to hold the silly plot together. I can't help but like this movie though, despite it's myriad flaws. It's the supporting cast that makes Foul Play as enjoyable as it is. Look who else is in it: Brian Dennehy, Burgess Meredith, Billy Barty and Dudley Moore. (All are dead now, by the way. And don't tell me Brian Dennehy is still alive. You and I both know that Brian Dennehy and Brian Keith are/were the same person.)
Two scenes are absolutely worth the price of the rental. The first is the legendary American debut of Dudley Moore, which is the one scene everybody probably remembers most. While Goldie is trying to hide from a villain known only as "the albino," she asks Dudley Moore to take her back to his place. He misunderstands, thinking he's going to get lucky. It's rotfl funny, with Dudley's valentines day boxers, and the disco ball, and the helium filled blow-up dolls, and the murphy bed with its little trumpet fanfare. That one scene propelled Dudley Moore to stardom, and the next year he did 10 with Bo Derek.
Here's an interesting bit of Dudley Moore/George Segal trivia, which I got from IMDb.
[Dudley Moore was] the first choice to play Henry Fine in "The Mirror Has Two Faces," only to be replaced by George Segal (who was, ironically, replaced by Moore in the role of George Webber in "10"). In an interview following his announcement that he had supranuclear palsy, he revealed that he was dismissed from the role because he had trouble remembering his lines.
The second most memorable scene in
Foul Play is when Burgess Meredith kicks the villainess's ass in a kung-fu fight. That's pretty much all I need to say about that crazy scene.
I did run into a little suspension of disbelief issue when Chevy and Goldie were racing through San Francisco trying to get to the Opera House in time to foil the assassination plot. They seemed to be driving through all the wrong neighborhoods. Maybe I know the City too well, but I was like: "Dude, it ain't that hard. Just take Gough, you'll get there in five minutes."
The costumes weren't all that hot. Goldie wears a lot of nondescript solid color sweaters. She ends the movie in a disco era powder blue décolleté that I don't like at all. The music however, was a strong point for me. Barry Manilow sings the Oscar nominated theme song and, as you know, I love Barry. Plus, Gilbert and Sullivan's The Mikado is featured throughout.
I'm giving Foul Play three Netflix stars. It made me laugh a lot more than it had a right to. But the characters are lovable, and it definitely succeeds as fun and light entertainment.
Previous installments in the 1st Annual Annika's Journal Film Festival can be found here. I have three more to go. Next up, Seems Like Old Times.
Update: Congratulations to Goldie Hawn, who recieved the American Film Institute's Star Award in Aspen last Saturday. She's still hot.
Posted by: annika at
11:14 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1265 words, total size 9 kb.
1
Goldie in a catfight with another lady must be funny to watch.
Posted by: Frank at March 18, 2006 07:00 PM (LzREz)
2
Speaking of cat fights...
Burgess Meredith's arm positions are kind of funky in the above screen shot, but his cat stance isn't half bad.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at March 19, 2006 01:56 AM (TDwc6)
3
Meredith is another great underestimated (or overlooked) actor, He had quite a long carreer which included an Oscar.
As to why you could never warm up to Chevy Chase, Chase is to me, rather like Jon Stewart. His "comedy" chops are nothing more than playing a camera mugging straight man who makes funny faces.
I never watch the daily Show anymore because I have grown to loath Stewart for that reason. Chase was not really funny in Caddy Shack so much as he was IN a funny movie. That movie was carried by three of the most genuinely funny people ever, Bill Murry, Ted Knight, and Rodney Dangerfield.
Posted by: Kyle N at March 19, 2006 05:55 AM (lzs+B)
4
Oh man - I so loved Foul Play when I was a kid ... that Dudley Moore scene is laugh-out-loud funny.
Posted by: red at March 19, 2006 04:18 PM (Tx/iW)
5
I agree 100% with Kyle N on Chevy.
It doesn't suprise me that there is a shorter route to the opera house (or theatre or whatever it was in that movie) But it would be a waste not to utilize the best car scene streets in this great country, even if it is a bit gratuitous.
Inspired by the openning credits on 'The Streets of San Fransisco,' my cousin and I used to hit a local Atlanta hill well above the speed limit. Temporary flight ensued and it was fun, if not horrible on the Honda Civic's suspension. The fact that the approach was not perpendicular to the hill and that there was a railroad track on top of it were minor inconveniences and when it was dark enough out it felt just like S.F.
That was many years ago and no we didn't have a rebel flag painted on top of the car.
Compliments on the great movie reviews.
Posted by: Mike C. at March 19, 2006 04:30 PM (wZLWV)
6
Kyle is spot on. I remember when he left SNL to make movies, then came back to guest host, and one of the skits was a about an SNL member who left, and disappeared forever. He was the first to leave the ensemble, and easily the runt of the litter. Jon Stewart is of the same milieu.
Posted by: Casca at March 19, 2006 09:56 PM (2gORp)
7
Excellent analysis of the films; you bring them back like it was yesterday. I can't wait for you to cover the one where she marries an Arab Prince (I've forgotten the name of that one) and refuses to be submissive.
Posted by: Will at March 20, 2006 05:19 AM (GzvlQ)
Posted by: shelly at March 22, 2006 01:52 AM (BJYNn)
9
What no AI blogging? Gawd there are some seriously ugly people on that show. Let me know when they axe the old guy, the kid, and that black chick with the monster ass.
Posted by: Casca at March 23, 2006 06:42 AM (y9m6I)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 17, 2006
New Boys' Toy
Best
quote: "I thought this thing was sick."
Have fun guys!
Posted by: annika at
06:38 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Homina-homina-homina-homina . . .
[uhhhHHH]
[sigh]
I'm going to take a nap now.
Posted by: Matt at March 17, 2006 07:09 AM (10G2T)
2
Hugo isn't gonna like it. I wouldn't mind getting one to keep the neighborhood vermin in check.
Posted by: d-rod at March 17, 2006 07:13 AM (k9puX)
3
This thing is phallic. There's nothing like having a bigger, faster, more powerful, more accurate weapon. You lug it around with pride. You yearn for opportunities to deploy it.
“You can put six rounds on target in under three seconds,” Flanery said. “I thought this thing was sick.”
Posted by: gcotharn at March 17, 2006 10:15 AM (3Sbj7)
4
Yeah, the 203 always was a worthless piece of shit. It's about time our grenadiers had some firepower. Now if we only still had the flechette round.
Posted by: Casca at March 17, 2006 12:09 PM (y9m6I)
5
Yup, gotta agree with Casca, the 203 was a real piece of shit. You couldn't interdict a coca sack laden burro led by a ten year old in the Columbian highlands with it. I once fired one at a platoon leader in Granada and he still rode the wave on to the beach.
Real crap piece of hardware.
My fingers statred twitching when I read the piece on the M-32.
Posted by: Strawman at March 17, 2006 04:10 PM (0ZdtC)
6
Go away ya draft dodgin' shitstain.
Posted by: Casca at March 17, 2006 04:36 PM (2gORp)
7
The forerunner of this weapon can be seen on the old Christopher Walken movie Dogs of War. But it looks like this one has a higher rate of fire, and is more accurate. (Although you don't have to be too accurate with 40mm greandes)
Posted by: Kyle N at March 18, 2006 04:52 AM (FBJ4S)
8
Nice one Casca. You're such a good advert for the military mind
ne step above a prokaryote.
Posted by: Strawman at March 19, 2006 01:09 PM (0ZdtC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 16, 2006
Hanoi Jane News
From the
AP:
Jane Fonda's 1972 trip to North Vietnam is haunting her again. The Georgia Senate on Thursday nearly unanimously defeated a resolution that would have honored the actress' charity work in the state.
. . .
"I can think of no living American who is less worthy of this honor," Republican Sen. John Douglas declared. "She is as guilty of treason as Benedict Arnold and Tokyo Rose."
Nice one, senator.
Via commenter Shelly.
Posted by: annika at
08:46 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 79 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I learned this recently:
After the Vietnam War was over, word leaked out that Pol Pot and North Vietnamese were butchering people in Cambodia and South Vietnam.
Jane Fonda and Tom Hayden spent mega-bucks, time and effort in a disinformation campaign saying that the news of mass executions was right-wing propaganda. They even worked to stop any humanitarian aid from going to those countries. They stated that Pol Pot and Ho Chi Min were wise and gentle leaders and the people in those countries were well looked after.
Their campaign worked. No country came to the aid of the people of Cambodia and South Vietnam.
Years later, it was confirmed that 1,500,000 people were executed in Cambodia and South Vietnam. Jane Fonda and Tom Hayden said nothing. No regrets, no apologies.
How does that woman sleep at nights?
Posted by: Jake at March 16, 2006 09:45 PM (e/Bm7)
2
Ambien?
She's vacuous. Lucky for her she was born to Henry Fonda and had a pretty good unit.
Unlucky for all of us, especially the Cambodians and Vietnamese who were slaughtered.
Posted by: shelly at March 17, 2006 02:31 AM (BJYNn)
3
Growing up my father wouldn't let us kids watch any movies or shows that she was in. To this day he still won't watch anything himself that has her in it. Try and bring up her name and it's a sure way of getting him pissed off for the rest of the day. She really should have been tried for treason. Maybe they coluldn't prove it in the end but the effort to prosecute her should have been made none-the-less.
Posted by: Andy at March 17, 2006 08:20 AM (688sS)
4
Hey Jake,
"No country came to the aid of the people of Cambodia and South Vietnam."
I think Jane came to the aid of the people of North Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos during their butchering
What's the problem?
Posted by: Strawman at March 17, 2006 03:50 PM (0ZdtC)
5
I can't wait until she's pushing up daisys in LA somewhere. I'll stop at least once a year to water her grave.
Posted by: Casca at March 17, 2006 04:45 PM (2gORp)
6
I've always liked this post from a HogOnIce commenter known as Rurik.......
[The North Vietnamese began infiltrating their troops and weapons into South Vietnam in May 1959, using the specially organized "Unit 559". The Ho Chi Minh Trail ran through Laos and Cambodia to reach South Vietnam. For years, until The spring of 1970, the North Vietnamese used western Cambodia as a base to support their operations in South Vietnam. The Cambodian leader Prince Norodom Sihanouk was intimidated by the stronger communists and took a fence-sitting position of turning a blind eye to their presence, while also agreeing to permit US airstrikes in the Vietnamese controlled areas of his country - so long as they remained secret.
During 1970, the Cambodian army lost its patience and overthrew the weak Sihanouk and moved against the communists. At about the same time, the US Army sent troops into western Cambodia to seize the North Vietnamese sanctuaries.(See S.L.A. Marshal's "West To Cambodia"). This was a crucial blow which brought North Vietnamese offensive action in SVN almost to a standstill for two years. Everyone on the ground in SVN at the time noticed the change immediately (I was in SVN at that time, working for part of my tour with Vietnamese including a former VC who had changed sides). IMO the Cambodian incursion was one fo the best moves we made; had Johnson done it in 1965, the war probably would have been over by 1967.
After our incursion the Cambodians fought till 1975 when Congress cut off their ammunition and fuel supply, as they did with the Vietnamese. Sidney Schanberg and his friends actively helped the communists with their propaganda offensives, and proclaimed that the victory of communism would mean peace and prosperity for the region.
As for the Khmer Rouge, they were a particularly nasty Maoist cult who wanted to return society to a pristine state of equalitarian nature. This is why they shot people with glasses or other prostheses, and drove everyone out of the cities. (You might see a foreshadow of our own late environmentalist fanatics here). Blaming Nixon & Ford for the Cambodian Genocide is no different from blaming the Holocaust on Churchill and Roosevelt. If anyone is to be blamed, it would be all those Americans who opposed the US effort in Vietnam. But when people start to get an uneasy conscience, they create some bizarre rationalizations.]
Posted by: reagan80 at March 17, 2006 04:57 PM (K9tdw)
7
At some point, people's youthful mistakes have to be passed over, and their adult life taken into perspective. She has admitted her error and apologized more than once, so those who have passed over many of George Bush's foibles ought to reconsider.
Posted by: will at March 20, 2006 05:06 AM (GzvlQ)
8
After reading the other comments, it seems many people get themselves spin-doctored on propaganda blogs. I'd like to see factual confirmation on the amount of money and disinformation that Jane and Tom provided and when.
"This is why they shot people with glasses or other prostheses, and drove everyone out of the cities. (You might see a foreshadow of our own late environmentalist fanatics here)"
This is the most bizarre statement I've seen all year. A typical environmentalist would say the best place for a person is in a city or in a rural area on a farm.
Posted by: will at March 20, 2006 05:14 AM (GzvlQ)
9
Hey Will... have one of your family/friends murdered for the sake of a lying Jane Fonda and ask yourself how forgiving you'd be. Guess what Hollywood? This may come as a shock but since most of your stupid asses never even attended a college course I think it's fair to say that your opinion and subsequent actions mean didly squat... the only thing that sucks is the 'star power' idiots like Fonda acquire. STFU... go to Iraq. Go to Afghanistan. I promise you will see differently than what the 6pm news puts out each night.
-From a concerned soldier.
Posted by: Trisa at June 10, 2006 03:04 PM (Rhuwm)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Commie Star Trek
Check it out.
Via emailer Hannes.
Posted by: annika at
08:32 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thats just too good, i would love to see those with subtitiles.
Posted by: Kyle N at March 17, 2006 03:25 AM (HIeK9)
2
Bad news. This is a hoax.
(I first blogged about the show
a year ago, before a kind commenter pointed me to
this confession about the hoax.)
In any case, it's funny, and the plausibility of the hoax is even funnier.
Posted by: JohnL at March 17, 2006 08:39 AM (Hs4rn)
3
Of course it's a hoaks. The Russians didn't have TV's in the '60s.
Posted by: Casca at March 17, 2006 04:46 PM (2gORp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Airborne Assault
Woke up to
this news today:
U.S. forces, joined by Iraqi troops, on Thursday launched the largest airborne assault since the U.S.-led invasion, targeting insurgent strongholds north of the capital, the military said.
The military said the operation was aimed at clearing 'a suspected insurgent operating area' northeast of Samarra, 60 miles north of Baghdad, and was expected to continue over several days.
'More than 1,500 Iraqi and Coalition troops, over 200 tactical vehicles, and more than 50 aircraft participated in the operation,' the military statement said of the attack designed to 'clear a suspected insurgent operating area northeast of Samarra,' 60 miles north of Baghdad.
The province is a major part of the so-called Sunni triangle where insurgents have been active since shortly after the U.S.-led invasion three years ago.
Saddam Hussein was captured in the province, not far from its capital and his hometown, Tikrit.
Waqas al-Juwanya, a spokesman for
Iraq's joint coordination center in nearby Dowr, said 'unknown gunmen exist in this area, killing and kidnapping policemen, soldiers and civilians.'
Near the end of the first day of the operation, the military said, 'a number of enemy weapons caches have been captured, containing artillery shells, explosives, IED-making materials, and military uniforms.'
Noticeably absent from the story was any mention of "civilian deaths" or any quotes from the "insurgents" point of view. That may come later, but for now I'm proud of the AP writer.
Posted by: annika at
08:44 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 239 words, total size 2 kb.
1
You've got a point. This is being carried out with mostly Iraqi troops in the lead. I halfway expect later reports to claim Iraqi troops unfairly killed Iraqi civilians, and to take the tone that it is unfair for Iraqi troops to fight the insurgents/terrorists. After all, what right have Iraqi troops to interfere in the local matters of Samarra? That is an issue for Samarrans to handle. Iraqi troops are interfering in the internal matters of Samarra, and killing innocent civilians in the process. Reprehensible.
Posted by: gcotharn at March 16, 2006 03:15 PM (3Sbj7)
2
I'm sure when planning this they also took into account that Iran was watching very closely.
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at March 16, 2006 06:44 PM (DdRjH)
3
Happy St. Pat's! Interesting: with the Irish banner, you've got a rainbow and a new, fancy font. Thanks to those changes, I briefly thought I'd stumbled upon a very happy blog called Cannabis Journal.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at March 16, 2006 06:54 PM (TDwc6)
4
Haha, Kevin. I usually post that kind of banner on April 20th.
Posted by: annika at March 16, 2006 08:10 PM (fxTDF)
5
I had to look up the 420 reference. I now consider myself edumacated.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at March 18, 2006 12:20 AM (1PcL3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 15, 2006
Tournament Bracket
As a teaser, I'm revealing one quarter of my tournament bracket for you all to harsh on.
I'm in Six Meat Buffet's ESPN group. As you can see, I'm really a believer in 'Bama. Also, the 'Zags don't make it to the sweet sixteen on my chart and Kent State gets shot down in the first round. But am I dreaming when I pick Memphis to make the final four? Stay tuned.
Update: Fuck. Oklahoma is out. There goes my Minneapolis bracket.
Posted by: annika at
08:07 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 86 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LOVE, the four leaf clover placement.
Posted by: Casca at March 16, 2006 06:15 AM (y9m6I)
2
With all due respect: Given your MNF pick and fantasy baseball records...well, I think your question is answered.
Posted by: Victor at March 16, 2006 07:54 AM (L3qPK)
3
Casca: four-leaf clovers symbolize "gettin lucky."
Victor: you are a big meanie.
Posted by: annika at March 16, 2006 08:35 AM (fxTDF)
4
heh heh heh...she said "fuck" heh heh
Posted by: Pursuit at March 16, 2006 08:31 PM (n/TNS)
5
Memphis in the Final Four?! No way.
I never thought I'd say this but UCLA is coming out of that bracket.
Alabama will flop as most SEC teams do. Watch out for Kansas.
Posted by: Thomas Galvin at March 16, 2006 09:07 PM (Cc94D)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Scientollywierd
Now, I wouldn't have guessed
Beck.
Posted by: annika at
03:24 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 8 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I had thought Beck was too talented to be allowed into their creepy little society.
Posted by: Mark W at March 16, 2006 07:57 AM (aklAt)
2
He was born into it. Raised in it.
Just like Erika and Hayden Christensen. And Juliette Lewis.
Posted by: red at March 16, 2006 11:21 AM (rNgdr)
3
I knew about Beck, but didn't know about Nancy Cartwright.
Surprised they left Katie Holmes off the list.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at March 16, 2006 12:30 PM (OeJic)
4
Am I wrong in having a deep rooted desire to murder all Scientologists in the most painful ways imaginable?
Posted by: Kyle N at March 16, 2006 03:26 PM (LFrug)
5
I totally agree. That is exactly how I understand it.I am very lucky to get this tips from you
neon signs wholesale. Great! Thanks for sharing will be sure to follow this blog regularly
Business Signs. WOW! this is awesome
LED neon sign! you can download it at my website for FREE along with lots of other games and media content
LED Signs. I look forward to more updates and will be returning.Cheers!
Posted by: Advertising signs at January 21, 2011 02:53 AM (zpIH7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday Is Poetry Day
The following poem is ascribed to St. Patrick, patron saint of Ireland, born a Roman citizen in Scotland in the year 387 and died at Saul, Downpatrick, Ireland on March 17, 493.
St. PatrickÂ’s Breastplate
I arise today
Through a mighty strength, the invocation of the Trinity,
Through the belief in the threeness,
Through confession of the oneness
Of the Creator of Creation.
I arise today
Through the strength of Christ's birth with his baptism,
Through the strength of his crucifixion with his burial,
Through the strength of his resurrection with his ascension,
Through the strength of his descent for the judgment of Doom.
I arise today
Through the strength of the love of Cherubim,
In obedience of angels,
In the service of archangels,
In hope of resurrection to meet with reward,
In prayers of patriarchs,
In predictions of prophets,
In preaching of apostles,
In faith of confessors,
In innocence of holy virgins,
In deeds of righteous men.
I arise today
Through the strength of heaven:
Light of sun,
Radiance of moon,
Splendor of fire,
Speed of lightning,
Swiftness of wind,
Depth of sea,
Stability of earth,
Firmness of rock.
I arise today
Through God's strength to pilot me:
God's might to uphold me,
God's wisdom to guide me,
God's eye to look before me,
God's ear to hear me,
God's word to speak for me,
God's hand to guard me,
God's way to lie before me,
God's shield to protect me,
God's host to save me
From snares of devils,
From temptations of vices,
From everyone who shall wish me ill,
Afar and anear,
Alone and in multitude.
I summon today all these powers between me and those evils,
Against every cruel merciless power that may oppose my body and soul,
Against incantations of false prophets,
Against black laws of pagandom
Against false laws of heretics,
Against craft of idolatry,
Against spells of witches and smiths and wizards,
Against every knowledge that corrupts man's body and soul.
Christ to shield me today
Against poison, against burning,
Against drowning, against wounding,
So that there may come to me abundance of reward.
Christ with me, Christ before me, Christ behind me,
Christ in me, Christ beneath me, Christ above me,
Christ on my right, Christ on my left,
Christ when I lie down, Christ when I sit down, Christ when I arise,
Christ in the heart of every man who thinks of me,
Christ in the mouth of everyone who speaks of me,
Christ in every eye that sees me,
Christ in every ear that hears me.
I arise today
Through a mighty strength, the invocation of the Trinity,
Through belief in the threeness,
Through confession of the oneness,
Of the Creator of Creation.
According to tradition, St. Patrick composed this prayer before travelling to convert Ireland's pagan king. Along the way, assassins were set to murder him but as he said the prayer, the attackers mistook his party for a herd of deer. Thus it is also known as "The Deer's Cry."
Thomas Cahill doubts that the poem was written by St. Patrick himself, instead dating it to the 7th or 8th Century.
The earliest expression of European vernacular poetry, it is, in attitude, the work of a Christian Druid, a man of both faith and magic. Its feeling is entirely un-Augustinian; but it is this feeling that will go on to animate the best poetry of the Middle Ages. If Patrick did not write it (at least in its current form), it surely takes its inspiration from him. For in this cosmic incantation, the anarticulate outcast who wept for slaves, aided common men in difficulty, and loved sunrise and sea at last finds his voice. Appropriately, it is an Irish voice.
[Cahill,
How The Irish Saved Civilization, p.116.]
Posted by: annika at
07:33 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 629 words, total size 4 kb.
1
It's been turned into one of my favorite hymns, and one of the most difficult to sing.
Posted by: Hugo Schwyzer at March 15, 2006 08:31 AM (Qst0d)
2
Here's the link: http://www.cyberhymnal.org/htm/s/t/stpatric.htm
Posted by: Hugo at March 15, 2006 08:32 AM (Qst0d)
Posted by: Casca at March 15, 2006 11:36 AM (y9m6I)
4
Good ol St. Pat, God with me, before me, behind me, always liked those lines. best,
Posted by: scary smart at March 15, 2006 11:39 AM (a3fqn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 14, 2006
AI Blogging
Top four for me were Katharine, Paris, Taylor and Chris, in that order. Katharine and Paris were almost tied, but I gave the edge to Katharine because I didn't expect her to be so polished as she was.
But let me tell you, there's a reason Stevie Wonder is an icon. When Randy, who's prone to exagerration, said that Stevie is one of the greatest singers in the known world, Randy was lying. Stevie is one of the greatest musicians in history. You could see how the top twelve struggled with what he makes sound easy.
And Stevie's effect on people reminds me of how devotees react when they get close to the guru. It's supernatural.
Finally, I think Kevin may have bought himself another week.
Posted by: annika at
10:20 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I hate, hate, hate Kevin. There is nobody I'd rather see go home more.
Katharine is still my AI crush, and she has talent too. Bonus.
Oh --- wait. I hate that Ace "Soon to be appearin on the OC" Young kid even more than I hate Kevin "Chicken Little, but still sexy" Covais.
Taylor Hicks is impossible not to love.
Posted by: Robbie at March 15, 2006 06:47 AM (lbWbV)
2
Paris and Chris are my favorites. They're just so damn talented and likable. There's also something that I really like about Mandisa.
I hope to GOD Kevin hasn't bought himself another week, though I will give him props for the self-effacing remark about being this year's Sex Symbol, as long as he meant it ironically. I'm pretty sure he did.
I'm having a hard time understanding the hype of Ace. Maybe this is just me, but I really don't find him all that attractive. I'd almost say Chris is better-looking.
Posted by: The Law Fairy at March 15, 2006 12:13 PM (XUsiG)
3
Ace is a babe, but Chris is sexy! I've always had a thing for bald musicians too.
Posted by: annika at March 15, 2006 01:01 PM (bDd6W)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
"Civil War" Semantics
What exactly is "civil war" and is Iraq really
edging closer to it?Iraqi authorities discovered at least 87 corpses — men shot to death execution-style — as Iraq edged closer to open civil warfare. Twenty-nine of the bodies, dressed only in underwear, were dug out of a single grave Tuesday in a Shiite neighborhood of Baghdad.
. . .
Police began unearthing bodies early Monday, although the discoveries were not immediately reported. The gruesome finds continued throughout the day Tuesday, police said, marking the second wave of sectarian retribution killings since bombers destroyed an important Shiite shrine last month.
In the mayhem after the golden dome atop the Askariya shrine in Samarra was destroyed on Feb. 22, more than 500 people have been killed, many of them Sunni Muslims and their clerics. Dozens of mosques were damaged or destroyed.
Underlining the unease in the capital, Interior Ministry officials announced another driving ban, from 8 p.m. Wednesday to 4 p.m. Thursday to protect against car and suicide bombs while the Iraqi parliament meets for the first session since the Dec. 15 election.
Okay. Sounds like there's been some violence. Nothing new there. The government is taking steps to limit further violence. Also to be expected. But where is the support for the assertion that this recent violence is something new ― something different than the insurgency that has been going on since 2003?
People are throwing the term "civil war" around a lot lately, and I think it's interesting that nobody defines what that means. So I looked to that unassailable source, the Wikipedia, which has this to say:
A civil war is a war in which parties within the same country or empire struggle for national control of state power. As in any war, the conflict may be over other matters such as religion, ethnicity, or distribution of wealth. Some civil wars are also categorized as revolutions when major societal restructuring is a possible outcome of the conflict. An insurgency, whether successful or not, is likely to be classified as a civil war by some historians if, and only if, organized armies fight conventional battles. Other historians state the criteria for a civil war is that there must be prolonged violence between organized factions or defined regions of a country (conventionally fought or not). In simple terms, a Civil War is a war in which a country fights another part of itself. [links omitted]
More enlightenment can be found in the classic text,
The American Constitution, Its Origins And Development, which describes the semantic issue in the context of the American Civil War:
An insurrection is legally construed to be an organized and armed uprising for public political purposes; it may seek to overthrow the government, or it may seek merely to suppress certain laws or to alter administrative practice. A rebellion in general is considered to have a much more highly developed political and military organization than an insurrection; in international law it conveys belligerent status. Generally, such belligerent status implies that the belligerent government is attempting by war to free itself from the jurisdiction of the parent state, that it has an organized de facto government, that it is in control of at least some territory, and that it has sufficient proportions to render the issue of the conflict in doubt. An international war, on the other hand, is one between two or more independent states who are recognized members of the family of nations.
In international law the rights of parties to an armed conflict vary greatly with their status. Insurgents have a very limited status; they are not mere pirates or bandits, but their activities do not constitute 'war' in the de jure sense, and they cannot claim against neutrals the privileges of the laws of war. A full rebellion, on the other hand, is a 'war' so far as international law is concerned and the rebel government possesses all the belligerent rights of a fully recognized international state, toward both neutrals and the parent state. Needless to say, a parent state may attempt by force to suppress either an insurrection or a rebellion. In domestic law rebels may be criminals in the eyes of the parent state, and answerable to its courts if their movement fails. (Kelly, Harbison and Belz, The American Constitution, Its Origins And Development, 1955, 6th ed. at pp. 306-07.)
In the American Civil War, the Confederacy tried to define the conflict as an international war. Obviously, the Federals tried to define it as an insurrection. In truth, it was a rebellion. But the historic distinctions are interesting when applied to what's going on in Iraq.
I think it's clear that there is no civil war yet, by any accepted definition of the term. Can it happen? Perhaps, but there would need to be a lot more organization on the part of the al Qaeda and Baathists who are currently running the opposition. I think that's a long way off. Right now, it's just an ad hoc campaign of violence, much like a gang war, with no clearly articulated end other than to chase the US out.
Posted by: annika at
05:58 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 855 words, total size 6 kb.
March 13, 2006
Blog=Sex
You can thank me later.
Via Beth.
Posted by: annika at
08:46 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 9 words, total size 1 kb.
1
hhhhmmmm, lets see, A)Go to church, possibly meet someone
B)Go out to bars and nightclubs, probably get laid
C)join volunteer organizations, might get laid
D)get involved with artsy crap like community theater, definitly get laid
e) go into chat rooms, low possibility of getting laid
f) BLOG? - never, ever, get laid
Posted by: Kyle N at March 14, 2006 02:41 AM (1viF1)
2
I still don't know who won the game. See, I'm not into men's basketball. Too many prima donnas.
Hockey, now...now,
that's a game!
Posted by: Victor at March 14, 2006 05:08 AM (L3qPK)
3
They're confused. They're probably mistaking PlentyofFish.com for a blog. Why I met a wanton hussy there just this past weekend.
Posted by: Casca at March 14, 2006 06:21 AM (y9m6I)
4
Any stories you care to share in this regard, Annie dear?
Posted by: Hugo at March 14, 2006 03:06 PM (Yu24L)
5
Of course, Annika has more noble reasons for blogging.
Posted by: Mark at March 14, 2006 05:01 PM (Vg0tt)
6
there is nothing more noble than nooky.
Posted by: Kyle N at March 14, 2006 05:49 PM (MaXhp)
7
Was it good for me, too?
Posted by: shelly at March 15, 2006 06:10 AM (BJYNn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 11, 2006
Go Cal Bears!
Cal beat Oregon last night, and will play #13 UCLA today for the PAC-10 championship! It's now an intrafamily rivalry Saturday, my dad being a UCLA graduate.
California (20-9) reached its first Pac-10 tournament final with a 91-87 double-overtime victory Friday over Oregon. The Bears, who finished third in the conference, likely will make the field of 65 regardless of the outcome of this game.
Forward Leon Powe claimed a Pac-10 tournament record for the second straight game, scoring 41 points to better the previous mark of 39, set by UCLA's Reggie Miller in 1987.
The senior, whose late basket forced the second overtime, established a new rebounding record Thursday by pulling down 20 in a victory over Southern California.
Ayinde Ubaka added 12 of his 17 points in the two overtime periods for Cal, which rallied from a 16-point first-half deficit and a seven-point gap in the final 2:45 of regulation.
The win gave Ben Braun his sixth 20-win season at Cal, moving past Hall of Fame coach Pete Newell for most in school history.
The teams have split two all-time Pac-10 tournament games, with Cal posting a 67-61 win in the 2002 quarterfinals. The road team won both games in the season series, with Bruins guard Arron Afflalo scoring 44 points in the two games.
But who will
Hugo root for?
The game is at 3:15 PST on CBS.
Posted by: annika at
08:25 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 236 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Are you kidding? Go Bears GO! Though I care far less about basketball than sports like football, track, and softball, I still am a loyal Golden Bear. I can switch allegiances deftly, always rooting for the Bruins save when they tangle with their elder and vastly superior brothers from the north.
Posted by: Hugo at March 11, 2006 09:35 AM (Yu24L)
2
Looks like the elder and vastly superior brothers got their lunch eaten by someone else this week.
Powder Blue rules. Watch out Blue Devils.
Posted by: shelly at March 12, 2006 02:15 PM (BJYNn)
Posted by: Victor at March 13, 2006 07:24 AM (WHtgF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Now People Think I'm Lindsay
As you know, I did a marginally funny spoof of an
e-mail to Lindsay Lohan well over a year ago. I got so many comments from Lindsay fans asking me to put them in touch with her, I had to close the comments. Now I just get tons of emails. It's tapered off to about one a week now.
Here's a new twist, though. Some emailers think I'm Lindsay! Which is inexplicable, especially if they've read even one or two posts of mine. Oh well, it's better than people thinking I'm Ashlee, which would truly be insulting.
From: "[redacted to prevent embarrassment]" [*]@hotmail.co.uk
To: coolconnector20@yahoo.com
Subject: to lindsey.lohan
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:00:50 +0000
hiya you dont know me but im one of your fans i always feel sorry 4 you when you get ppl taking pictures of you in the street when u want them 2 leave you alone. I would like 2 be in one of your films later in the years please could you add me email or send an email to me i aint sure if you are lindsey lohan or not if you are dont worry i wont telll any1 your email your in safe hands with me i look abit like you actually lol. i wish i was as pretty as u. ppl always say i do abit. i know alot about you that ive read on internet and makeup books i read.I wish we was m8s i always listen to your music and i think your are a good singer. Ive heard about your dad and i hope everythin goes well if it already has
my email addy is [*]@hotmail.co.uk
as i live in the uk lol of course
sorry 4 taking your time wish your ok and hope your brother and 11 year old sister is ok well guess shes nearly 12 now
i want to be a celeb like you but i aint sure where 2 start and i also wants 2 live in america but my
parents moan that i need some1 2 support me as i want 2 live in florida loved all your movies i aint seen herbie yet but the clips i have seen are kool
sorry if i am rambling on lol i would like to know your addy so i can talk to you but if u think im a pain following you, then you dont need 2 add my email addy.
nice talking to you lindsey bye bye xxxxxxx
Posted by: annika at
07:45 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 426 words, total size 2 kb.
1
omg your are lindsy!! omg i new it y didnt u telll us b4!!!
i new lindsy was republican thats is awsum1!!
hey can u giv me britny speers addy i want 2 email her 2.
Posted by: The Law Fairy at March 11, 2006 11:08 AM (954g7)
2
oh, shoot. I should've misspelled "republican" -- I doubt Lindsay fans know what a republican is.
I really should put more thought into my sarcastic comments.
Posted by: The Law Fairy at March 11, 2006 11:09 AM (954g7)
3
Aww, how cute. Send the kid an email just so she doesn't think she's being ignored by her idol.
Let her know that NO-BO-
DY has her email address who she she hasn't given it to, 'cuz as soon as she starts getting fan email she'll change it. But she can always send her a note by snail mail at:
Lindsay Lohan
c/o Richard Lovett
Creative Artists Agency LCC (CAA-LA)
9830 Wilshire Blvd
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
USA
Or you can just ignore the whole thing and let the kid wonder if she actually got in touch with Lindsay Lohan. That might be better. Who cares.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at March 11, 2006 11:10 AM (NCQeq)
4
LOL Law fairy!
Spork, do you have Goldie Hawn's email addy?
Posted by: annika at March 11, 2006 12:20 PM (fxTDF)
5
You're actually Lindsay Lohan?
Now we know why you hate Britney so much.
Me-ow!
Posted by: Victor at March 11, 2006 07:03 PM (Hfd2P)
6
Hey, no one here cares a whit about Lindsay Lohan (whoever the Hell she is)!! We're all Annie fans.
Besides which, she doesn't have freckles.
Posted by: shelly at March 12, 2006 11:26 AM (BJYNn)
7
Sorry, Annie. I found several snail-mail addresses but have no idea which (if any) are current. The only e-mail address I could find is the contact e-mail at her
Bright Light Foundation. I have no idea if anything sent there will ever get to Goldie, though.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at March 12, 2006 03:47 PM (ZdU9s)
8
I totally agree. That is exactly how I understand it.I am very lucky to get this tips from you
neon signs wholesale. Great! Thanks for sharing will be sure to follow this blog regularly
Business Signs. WOW! this is awesome
LED neon sign! you can download it at my website for FREE along with lots of other games and media content
LED Signs. I look forward to more updates and will be returning.Cheers!
Posted by: Advertising signs at January 21, 2011 02:55 AM (zpIH7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 09, 2006
Funny
annikagyrl: what do you get when you put the OC after AI?
bettyspaggetti: idk
annikagyrl: aioc!
bettyspaggetti: lol
annikagyrl: lol
bettyspaggetti: that wasn't funny
Posted by: annika at
09:18 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: KG at March 09, 2006 09:57 PM (SZsz5)
2
annika needs a new pair of shoes.
Posted by: Victor at March 10, 2006 06:15 AM (L3qPK)
3
Sounds like a goofy Monty Python gag*
*this is a funnier one-liner if you've seen Spamalot, which you absolutely should.
Posted by: The Law Fairy at March 10, 2006 10:40 AM (XUsiG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
BTW
Oh, by the way, today is my three year bloggy-versary. Congratulations will be accepted.
Posted by: annika at
07:30 PM
| Comments (28)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You've outgrown the Terrible Twos. Congrats!!
Posted by: Thomas Galvin at March 09, 2006 07:53 PM (Cc94D)
2
Congrats, Annie. I can't imagine what we ever did without you!
Posted by: Matt at March 09, 2006 08:37 PM (2pfYW)
3
much amusement! Congrats!
Posted by: gcotharn at March 09, 2006 09:11 PM (3Sbj7)
4
Thank you for visiting, sweeties!
Posted by: annika at March 09, 2006 09:20 PM (fxTDF)
Posted by: Josh at March 10, 2006 12:09 AM (f8ZUQ)
6
Felicidades! (from Barcelona)
Posted by: JdePols at March 10, 2006 01:01 AM (7/VoS)
7
congrats, annika!
Posted by: Chris at March 10, 2006 01:10 AM (us6mn)
Posted by: Mike C. at March 10, 2006 02:27 AM (wZLWV)
9
your blog
the only salve
for the perineal buboes
of my mind
Kevin
Cum grab your elation, Annika.
Posted by: Kevin Kim at March 10, 2006 04:52 AM (TDwc6)
10
Oh alright, I'll do it again. In Soviet Russia, they say, "yppah yrasrev-yggolb, akinnA!"
BTW, I'm surprised Casca hasn't made his presence known in this thread already.
Posted by: reagan80 at March 10, 2006 05:25 AM (JZTU6)
11
3 years? I'd say that puts you a good position to take down Ann Coulter...feel free to make some mud wrestling analogy, Casca.
Posted by: Mark W at March 10, 2006 05:50 AM (yTuVc)
Posted by: dawn summers at March 10, 2006 06:07 AM (0wAzz)
13
Annika is a skinny little thing, and Ann is well... the goddess of the right. The title of her latest column?
IT'S HARD OUT HERE FOR A WIMP
Three years? Sure seems longer, lol, thanks for the memories.
Posted by: Casca at March 10, 2006 06:21 AM (y9m6I)
14
I owe James a huge debt of grattitude for pointing me your way. Congratulations, kid!
Hey, is James still alive?
Posted by: Victor at March 10, 2006 06:37 AM (L3qPK)
15
Congratulations and thanks for all the good work!
Posted by: Trevor at March 10, 2006 09:58 AM (GtBBB)
16
You were my first commenter, and the first person to link to me... you're my blog "big sis", and I love ya. Congrats!
Posted by: Hugo at March 10, 2006 10:33 AM (Yu24L)
17
Congrats, Annika!
And, guys, Annika's way cuter than Ann Coulter, not to mention smarter. The mud wrestling wouldn't be a fair fight at all.
Posted by: The Law Fairy at March 10, 2006 10:43 AM (XUsiG)
18
Happy blog Anniversary Annika!
Omedetoo gozaimasu!!
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at March 10, 2006 10:55 AM (Wz2Gp)
19
Three years? Good lord! Imagine all the productive things you could have done besides hang out with this rabble!
Ah, but you were my first........linker, that is and the pictue of your desk revealed that we have similar interests.
Happy three year!
Posted by: Pursuit at March 10, 2006 12:14 PM (n/TNS)
20
Thank you thank you. You all make it worthwhile!
Posted by: annika at March 10, 2006 12:33 PM (fxTDF)
21
Congrats girl! You totally fucking rock!!!!
Posted by: Blu at March 10, 2006 12:40 PM (QExPp)
22
Happy day! Here is wishing you many more...
Posted by: The Maximum Leader at March 10, 2006 01:05 PM (jiSuM)
23
Me, too!
Many happy returns for the fun you provide.
Posted by: shelly at March 11, 2006 05:13 AM (BJYNn)
24
thanks so much, lindsey! luv ur blog and sorry if casca is a pain sometimes. he just wants to be as kool as u.. bye bye xxxxxxx
Posted by: d-rod at March 11, 2006 08:13 AM (aWqdX)
25
Annika,
Belated congratulations.
You provide a space not unlike my grammar school playground where as the kid who had ideas outside the mainstream I endured the distain and sometime violence of kids who, out of fear and misplaced patriotism (their parents of course), misunderstood liberty and what this country stood for. They thought that covering their heads in the corridors was an effective counter measure to the possible outcome of aggressive American nuclear policy.
Now they have grown up and cover their asses with the shabby rhetoric of fear once again and support the slaughter innocents who are in the way of the continuing agressive militarism of this great but misguided country.
I am greatfull to you and do wish you well in your (sucessful) endevour to create a space where all may share ideas. Keep your mind open.
Posted by: Strawman at March 11, 2006 11:34 AM (0ZdtC)
26
Thanks Straw, glad to have you!
Posted by: annika at March 11, 2006 12:21 PM (fxTDF)
27
Congrats, thanks, and best wishes on many more, Annie! This whole blogosphere thingie wouldn't be quite the same without you.
Posted by: Dave J at March 13, 2006 09:01 AM (CYpG7)
28
Am glad to see it come
Posted by: Scof at March 15, 2006 11:41 AM (a3fqn)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
For Those Keeping Score . . .
. . . it's President Bush - 0,
the base - 2
Posted by: annika at
01:52 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 26 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Blu at March 09, 2006 01:54 PM (Zn3gd)
2
yeah I think so. And its not just Bush. I have posted on sites like Red State and RWN that I believe the right is undergoing a change right now to a more libertarian and somewhat populist version, and away from the hard line "Limbaugh" version.
That means Beltway Bozos Better Beware. In the words of Pete Townshend, "We're not gonna take it!"
Posted by: Kyle N at March 09, 2006 02:24 PM (1i69H)
3
I never really equated libertarianism and populism. How do you connect the two? I see them as two very distinct and, at times antithetical, political philosophies.
Also keep in mind that Rush was probably the most important (though clearly not the only) voice in killing the Miers' nomination. How does that fact fit into your paradigm? (His essay in the WSJ about a conservative "crack down" on Bush was brilliant political analysis.)
Regardless, the "base," however it is currently constituted, has in two different cases (Miers & ports) disagreed with the President and has been vocal in its disagreement. And in both cases it seems like the President's "political" folks have proven totally inept. It did not require a high political IQ to realize this port deal was a big loser regarless of whether it made sense from a strategic and policy perspective. Bush needs a shake-up in his administration because they have been off their game since his re-election.
Posted by: Blu at March 09, 2006 04:25 PM (Zn3gd)
4
two words: Karen Hughes
Anyways, it's interesting you mention Rush, Blu. He ended up on the wrong side of this one didn't he. And I certainly didn't like his condescending attitude towards the dissenters. Another interesting aspect was Professor Hugh. He's now 1-1, having been Miers' most vocal backer and also the earliest major critic of the Port deal.
Lastly, I'd like to point out that the Democrats have never figured out how to beat Bush, and the only time they could do it in the last five years was to side with the conservative base. There's a lesson there, if only they could learn it.
Posted by: annika at March 09, 2006 06:58 PM (fxTDF)
5
I agree that Karen Hughes is badly needed in the White House. I don't know if it's because Bush will listen to her when he will not listen to others; or maybe because she balances out Karl Rove, by bringing an extremely down-to-earth touch to political strategy and political messages; but they need her as badly as any organization has ever needed anybody. Why she isn't there is a great mystery to me.
I have to say, I believe forcing Dubai to cancel its ports contract is a bad call. The Bush Administration backed down to a misinformation campaign, imo. I believe the positives would've outweighed whatever teeny sliver of risk was involved. Will those who oppose the deal now call to eject every Islamic nation from every port or airport where they are conducting business? Will those who oppose the deal now call to shut down Dubai's air terminal at JFK - which has received direct flight after direct flight from Dubai for some years - with each flight flying RIGHT PAST MANHATTAN? I think our nation over-reacted. I think those who said Dubai would "own the ports", or who implied anything close to that, were misleading our nation.
I now owe this blog two cents.
Posted by: gcotharn at March 09, 2006 07:42 PM (3Sbj7)
6
My guess is that the various factions (for lack of a better word) that make up the base have each had their fill... you can only take the "trust us" stuff for so long. Miers was the tipping point and this one was just so badly botched that there was no way it was going to win.
I'm still surprised that W got the nomination in 2000 and that he was lucky enough to run into a couple of the worst candidates for president in the last 100 years.
Posted by: KG at March 09, 2006 09:57 PM (SZsz5)
7
He continued, imo, to support DP because;
1) He had already approved them indirectly, and he never admits he was wrong, and
2) He was playing good cop, because Dubai HAS been cooperative in many areas.
Any opinions on the Kemp/Edwards collaboration?
Posted by: will at March 10, 2006 04:41 AM (GzvlQ)
8
gcotharn is right, we lost to a disinformation campaign. In the long run it's a tempest in a teapot. A deuce, too high to mark.
Posted by: Casca at March 10, 2006 07:01 AM (y9m6I)
9
Annie,
Your dislike for Rush, in my opinion, blinds you to his very good political analysis. Now, is he as bright as HH or Medved or Praeger? Of course not. But he is a better political analyst than all of them. If you listened to him on the port deal his analysis was that it was a loser politically but that he felt it made sense strategically (long term) and from a policy perspective. BUT he also felt like it wouldn't happen---that the base and a media happy to jump on any anti-Bush bandwagon would squash it.
For the record, my favorite guy is Medved; but, I believe that Rush is better at gauging issues from a perspective of pure politics more than anybody else on the radio. I don't think he gets enough credit for that or for single-handedly making any of the other right-of-center radio people even possible.
Posted by: Blu at March 10, 2006 12:38 PM (QExPp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The First Annual AJFF: Goldie Hawn, Part Four
Shampoo, 1975
Yes, the biggie, the classic. There's a lot to say about Shampoo, and a lot of good stuff has been written already.
In my view, this was a transitional movie in Goldie Hawn's career. She was thirty when the film came out. As Warren Beatty's girlfriend Jill, you still see the cute vulnerable waif from her previous comedies, but you also see flashes of the more assertive Goldie Hawn characters of the eighties and nineties. There's even a hint of that whininess she later honed to perfection in Bird On A Wire, Overboard and Private Benjamin.
Make no mistake, Shampoo is a Warren Beatty - Julie Christie vehicle, and Goldie is a supporting player.* But she had definitely arrived by 1975, and being cast in this film was merely proof of the fact.
Shampoo is another bedroom farce, but a vastly different one from Cactus Flower. Although set in 1968 (election day to be exact), Shampoo is a movie of the Seventies, or more accurately, that part of the Seventies which inspired the phrase "The Me Decade." Instead of slamming doors, each peccadillo is punctuated by a shot of Beatty tearing across Beverly Hills on his little Triumph 500.
Shampoo is about fucking. As much as each character can get away with. It's a very pre-aids movie. For a script that took eight years to write ― and the writing process was contentious at times ― there's not much of a plot. In a sense it's very much like a Dazed And Confused for the over 30 set. All the action takes place within about a 48 hour period. Beatty plays a vacant hairdresser juggling at least three women at the same time. Goldie is his easily manipulated girlfriend. Julie Christie plays an old flame who's also Goldie's best friend. And Lee Grant plays a client who's giving him a little something something on the side. Grant won an Academy Award for the role.
I must confess I didn't like Shampoo at first, mainly because I'm not a big fan of Warren Beatty. I hated Bullworth and Dick Tracy. And I was ambivalent about Bugsy, although I thought Splendor In The Grass and Reds were fantastic. But Shampoo has grown on me with each viewing. What it lacks in plot, it makes up in great lines. Like these:
GEORGE: Ever listen to women talk? I do till it's running out my ears. They only talk about one thing, How some guy fucked them over. That's all that's on their minds.
Lol. I hate to say it, but that's true in many cases. Not
mine of course.
Here's some more classic dialogue. Lorna is the teenage daughter of one of the women Beatty's character is banging. She's played by Carrie Fisher in her first feature film role. I love this banter.
LORNA: Are you gay?... baked apple?... they're cold but they're good.
GEORGE: No thanks.
LORNA: Did you hear me?
GEORGE: Yeah.
LORNA: Well, are you? Are you queer?
GEORGE: yeah.
LORNA: (laughing) C'mon, are you or aren't you?
GEORGE: Gee, this is great.
He slices a piece of cheesecake. Lorna sits down, in the
chair nearest him now.
LORNA: C'mon, tell me. Don't be afraid.
GEORGE: Why do you wanna know so bad?
LORNA: See if you've been making it with my mother.
GEORGE: What would my being a faggot have to do with that?
LORNA: (shrugs) Nothing, I guess... have you ever made it with a guy?
GEORGE: Have you ever made it with a girl?
LORNA: I asked you first.
GEORGE: Yeah... I've made it with a girl...
Lorna smiles. A pause.
LORNA: Well, are you?
GEORGE: Am I what?
LORNA: Making it with my mother?
They end up screwing, of course.
There's two or three scenes with Goldie that blew me away. The first that comes to mind is a short scene when Goldie is walking home from an audition, and stops at a fruit stand. It shows the actress's maturation from a comedienne who delivers lines with great timing, to an actress who can show her inner dialogue without speaking a line.
You know she's obsessing over her fight with George, and whether or not to take that acting job, and you can see it all in her face, along with her character's indecisiveness and insecurity. Then she picks up an apple, and for just a moment, you watch her agonize over whether to buy the apple or not until she finally tosses it back in the bin. It's really hilarious.
The shot below is from another scene I love. It shows Goldie just after she got out of a porsche at the election night party, and her boyfriend Beatty is there escorting her best friend into the restaurant. Goldie shoots him a look that is pure daggers. And Beatty has this look like, "oh shit, this is going to be a long night." And it was.
By the way, the silver dress she wore for that election night party was simply adorable, and about as short as legally possible.
There's another great scene at a psychedelic party on a large Beverly Hills estate. Jack Warden's character and Goldie's happen to bust in on Warren Beatty and Julie Christie while they're fucking in the poolhouse. Julie Christie plays Warden's mistress, and Goldie's best friend, so you can imagine both of them are horrified at this discovery. But their reactions are the exact opposite of what you'd expect. It's a terrific scene.
My rating was three stars (liked it), definitely worth a rental. Next up on the AJFF: The Duchess and the Dirtwater Fox.
_______________
* Goldie also starred opposite Warren Beatty in 1971's Dollars. Unfortunately, that film is not yet on DVD, and therefore Netflix doesn't carry it.
Posted by: annika at
12:53 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 976 words, total size 7 kb.
1
What I remember about Shampoo is a Warren Beatty line. Warren says nothing improves your appearance more than a great haircut. If you are going to spend money on your appearance, spend money on your haircut first.
I have gotten expensive great haircuts ever since, and I have never been sorry. Thank you, Warren.
Posted by: Jake at March 09, 2006 07:20 AM (r/5D/)
2
LOVE this movie! thanks for the link, girl - I'm a huge Goldie Hawn fan. The other night, Foul Play was on TV and I watched it for the first time in, oh, 15 years?? It was so enjoyable. She's wonderful.
Posted by: red at March 09, 2006 07:41 AM (rNgdr)
3
I had forgotten all about this movie. The poolhouse scene was ripe with the suspense of the refrigerator door slowly opening to light up the couple on the floor.
And then George loses out in the end, though I'm sure he's simply off to his next conquests the next day.
Posted by: will at March 09, 2006 08:46 AM (GzvlQ)
4
Everybody says she and her daughter look similiar...which is true. But, Goldie in her prime was WAY WAY WAY hotter.
Posted by: Blu at March 09, 2006 01:56 PM (Zn3gd)
5
You are right to say that it was a movie of the times. It seems somewhat dated now, but I loved it when it came out. Goldie was best in the scene when she confronts Beatty over his indiscretions. That was the first time I thought she really showed any acting chops.
Most important to me was the breakout comedy performance of Jack Warden, Warden was a great character actor who only got good rolls after he had turned 50. He was even better in the next Beatty movie, Heaven Can wait, then he was hilarious in Used Cars with Kurt Russell (another Goldie connection). Another fine performance was in SO FINE with Ryan ONeil. And who can forget him as the insane Judge in The Brethren?
Posted by: Kyle N at March 09, 2006 02:34 PM (1i69H)
6
I love Jack Warden!! He fought in the Battle of the Bulge. Why I know that, I have no idea. But he's a terrific actor as well.
Posted by: red at March 09, 2006 04:29 PM (Tx/iW)
7
Oh, I forgot all about
Heaven Can Wait. Great movie.
Posted by: annika at March 09, 2006 07:06 PM (fxTDF)
Posted by: Blu at March 10, 2006 07:25 PM (QExPp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 08, 2006
AI Thoughts
Okay, cuz I know you've all been waiting for my AI thoughts.
Top three for me were Ace, Gideon and then my crush, Chris. Kevin will be going home tomorrow night along with, unfortunately, Gideon. I'm a huge Gideon fan, but I'm afraid his genre is too old fashioned for the average voter. But he led the competition all the way tonight. All the way until Ace came on, that is. Ace completely blew away the field. Completely. It totally slipped my mind how well he can do an MJ song.
Check in tomorrow night to see if I'm right.
Posted by: annika at
09:07 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 104 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Mixed Metaphors?
"If you keep your foot to the path, your shoulder to the wheel and your ax to the grindstone, you will get no work done!"
Posted by: Kyle N at March 09, 2006 02:37 PM (1i69H)
2
I thought Gedeon was one of the best last night, but you called it. I guess you can't teach an old leopard to change to new spots.
Posted by: DHammett at March 09, 2006 06:28 PM (J7BEJ)
3
Gideon got robbed. Kevin does not belong there.
Posted by: annika at March 09, 2006 09:24 PM (fxTDF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Visions Of Women's Day
Today is International Women's Day. Celebrate by visiting
The Cotillion, where you'll find as many points of view as there are types of women. Unlike on the feminist left, where anyone who doesn't toe the party line gets the boot. (How's that for mixed metaphors?)
Posted by: annika at
07:57 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
124kb generated in CPU 0.0595, elapsed 0.1321 seconds.
78 queries taking 0.1045 seconds, 325 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.