just trying to eat my waffles

April 21, 2008

A Message To Pennsylvania Voters

Smoke a Bomber on April 22nd!

Roll your own bomber logo here.

h/t Beth!

Posted by: annika at 10:42 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 24 words, total size 1 kb.

April 20, 2008

We Interrupt This Blog Re-Emergence For The Following Musical Interlude

If you forget everything else I ever told you, remember this: A thorough study of bluegrass music must ― repeat must ― begin with an examination of Bill Monroe.

Posted by: annika at 08:46 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.

Recommendations?

Anybody have a recommendation for a good 24" flat panel monitor? I was looking at the Samsung at Costco, but I hear ViewSonic is also good.

Posted by: annika at 08:32 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

April 19, 2008

Yet Another In A Series Of Satirical Environment Related Posts: Earth Day Suggestions

It's a well known and scientifically accepted truth that we are all on the verge of a major environmental catastrophe, which can only be averted by the election of Bronco Bomber. Unfortunately, we can't count on the gun-toting, God-clinging, xenophobic racists who vote in this country to recognize the Obamessiah as the Planet's one and only salvation. It doesn't look good for the old Obameister right now, but don't despair. We can still do our part. Here are thirteen practical suggestions for making this year's Earth Day count:

Refrain from swatting any flies. Flies are people too, and swatting is a violent act. Instead, try talking to the fly without preconditions.

Don't needlessly waste electricity at night. Turn off all your lights and stop watching tv. Instead, read a book and use your cell phone as a reading light.

Rather than waste water by going in your toilet, reuse old plastic grocery bags instead. Better yet, don't flush and plant a tree in the bowl. Presto, instant carbon offset!

If you're already walking or biking to work, bravo for you. But remember that you exhale more CO₂ when you exercise. Offset that contribution to greenhouse gasses by carrying a co-worker on your back.

Did you know that leaving the tap running while you brush your teeth wastes about thirty gallons of water a day? Stop brushing your teeth.

Don't buy any product that was ever manufactured, assembled, transported, marketed or sold by a large corporation. Instead, make all your own stuff. I know a guy named Fred who furnished his entire house using only natural materials he found locally or brought home from work.

Watching tv is a huge waste of electricity, but if you must watch your favorite show, wait for the re-runs. It's a great way to recycle.

Act. Be active. Activate. Actualize. Activist. Accentuate. Use these words in a sentence.

Wear hemp jewelry. My boyfriend proposed by giving me a hemp ring he made himself out of some free twine he stole from IKEA.

Browbeat your friends into becoming environmentally conscious. Guilt-trip them about eating meat. Set their pets free. Just be obnoxious in general.

Paint your house green. Then tell everybody you live in a green house. They won't know.

Practice Zero Population Growth responsibly. For instance, a hollowed out leek makes a great condom.

Water plants with your own blood.

Posted by: annika at 10:25 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 421 words, total size 3 kb.

1 You know, this along with your "save the earth" button might qualify you for a Nobel.

Posted by: Stew at April 19, 2008 01:38 PM (swd4s)

2 Yes, Stew, that is precious work. Annie, you've outdone yourself, yet again. That list is friggin' hilarious. Points #4 and #12 were my favorites. Though, I would modify #4 to just say: "Don't breath...at all. Your mere existence further weakens Mother Gaia, you selfish prick." The only thing that is more nauseating than the hysteria generated by "climate change" are the "solutions" that politicians want to implement. They seem to be nothing more than Luddite-inspired versions of the Great Leap Forward, but in reverse*. I'm not looking forward to when this thread is inevitably hijacked by a certain greeny, "moderate" killjoy. *Dismantling our industrialized economy in order to make environmental "progress"

Posted by: 08nagaer at April 19, 2008 01:58 PM (e55SP)

3 Nice list oh Funny One. Did you borrow number 8 from the Obomber people? It really reminds me of their campaign, words without qualifiers.

Posted by: Mike C. at April 20, 2008 09:04 AM (wearR)

4 Eh, I've been doing all of those things for years, but in my case out of sheer spite. On a tangentially related note, dear Hemlock's father has passed. You may enjoy his brilliant observation of the human condition. Don't miss the last two paragraphs. They're positively Waughvian. Alas, I can't post the link, since munu hates certain websites. Just search for Hemlock.

Posted by: Casca at April 21, 2008 02:32 PM (gOOVv)

5 "For instance, a hollowed out leek makes a great condom..." "Eh, I've been doing all of those things for years, but in my case out of sheer spite." Buh?...

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at April 21, 2008 04:45 PM (xHyDY)

6 Fuggit, I'll post the verbage. Hemlock lives in Hong Kong, and has traveled to Blighty for the event. The last two paragraphs of his post: The big excitement in this little community today is a children's party in the church hall. At one stage in the proceedings a parent displays his deeply held and already well-known convictions and his determination to shape his offspring accordingly. Â“No, Tarquin!Â” the man suddenly shrieks across the room as if his three-year-old son is about to stick a finger into a power socket. The father leaps over and snatches a small hot dog from the petrified child's hand. The kid bursts into tears. The father turns to the dozen or so stunned adult onlookers. Â“Tarquin doesn't eat meat!Â” he exclaims. Tarquin goes into a tantrum, wailing and thumping the floor and pointing at other toddlers chewing their pork-laced little morsels. His dad, posessed by the total righteousness of his behaviour, holds up the offending item. Â“He obviously confused it with the vegetarian sausages we have at home.Â” At Stonegallows Hall, plans for my father's funeral have been finalized. On hearing that it would be a humanist affair, I assumed it would be brief, informal and without such baubles as a grandiose coffin and extravagant wreaths. I pictured a simple consignment to the earth in a pleasant and unmarked spot, the body perhaps tied in a plain cotton shroud, with some acorns thrown in as the grave is filled with the last few inches of soil. Provided no druids turned up, that would have satisfied the old man's atheism and dislike of fuss and ritual, and mildly offended all the right people currently organizing masses to be said for him on both sides of the Atlantic for the repose of his soul. As it happens, survivors have ordered shiny casket, flowers, pall bearers Â– the full works. The standard Christian ceremony with God carefully teased out. It is for people who say they don't want, need or believe in something, but deep down they really do. In this respect Â– and I am absolutely positive there is no other Â– it can perhaps be likened to a vegetarian sausage.

Posted by: Casca at April 21, 2008 09:30 PM (gOOVv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

April 18, 2008

Bonus Friday Science Poem

Here's a poem, which purports to explain SchrÃ¶dinger's conjecture. It's by Cecil Adams, a long time idol of mine, in response to a poem by one of his interlocutors. This post itself was inspired by Stewy.

Schroedinger, Erwin! Professor of physics!
Wrote daring equations! Confounded his critics!
(Not bad, eh? Don't worry. This part of the verse
Starts off pretty good, but it gets a lot worse.)
Win saw that the theory that Newton'd invented
By Einstein's discov'ries had been badly dented.
What now? wailed his colleagues. Said Erwin, "Don't panic,
No grease monkey I, but a quantum mechanic.
Consider electrons. Now, these teeny articles
Are sometimes like waves, and then sometimes like particles.
If that's not confusing, the nuclear dance
Of electrons and suchlike is governed by chance!
No sweat, though--my theory permits us to judge
Where some of 'em is and the rest of 'em was."
Not everyone bought this. It threatened to wreck
The comforting linkage of cause and effect.
E'en Einstein had doubts, and so Schroedinger tried
To tell him what quantum mechanics implied.
Said Win to Al, "Brother, suppose we've a cat,
And inside a tube we have put that cat at--
Along with a solitaire deck and some Fritos,
A bottle of Night Train, a couple mosquitoes
(Or something else rhyming) and, oh, if you got 'em,
One vial prussic acid, one decaying ottom
Or atom--whatever--but when it emits,
A trigger device blasts the vial into bits
Which snuffs our poor kitty. The odds of this crime
Are 50 to 50 per hour each time.
The cylinder's sealed. The hour's passed away. Is
Our pussy still purring--or pushing up daisies?
Now, you'd say the cat either lives or it don't
But quantum mechanics is stubborn and won't.
Statistically speaking, the cat (goes the joke),
Is half a cat breathing and half a cat croaked.
To some this may seem a ridiculous split,
But quantum mechanics must answer, "Tough @#&!
We may not know much, but one thing's fo' sho':
There's things in the cosmos that we cannot know.
Shine light on electrons--you'll cause them to swerve.
The act of observing disturbs the observed--
Which ruins your test. But then if there's no testing
To see if a particle's moving or resting
Why try to conjecture? Pure useless endeavor!
We know probability--certainty, never.'
The effect of this notion? I very much fear
'Twill make doubtful all things that were formerly clear.
Till soon the cat doctors will say in reports,
"We've just flipped a coin and we've learned he's a corpse."'
So saith Herr Erwin. Quoth Albert, "You're nuts.
God doesn't play dice with the universe, putz.
I'll prove it!" he said, and the Lord knows he tried--
In vain--until fin'ly he more or less died.
Win spoke at the funeral: "Listen, dear friends,
Sweet Al was my buddy. I must make amends.
Though he doubted my theory, I'll say of this saint:
Ten-to-one he's in heaven--but five bucks says he ain't."

Posted by: annika at 09:22 AM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 505 words, total size 3 kb.

April 17, 2008

Best Pickle Discovery Of The Year

Oh Baby Baby, how was I supposed to know...

...that these plain-wrap brand pickles would be so dang tasty.

I got them at Ralph's.

N.B. This post should in no way be construed as having been inspired by, or being in any way related to the previous post.

Posted by: annika at 05:59 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.

Best Underwear Discovery Of The Year

I used to insist on natural fibers only next to my skin. But people can change. And as the Democrats are constantly reminding us, change is good. (Most especially when one is talking about change of underwear; I think we'd all agree on that.)

So now I'm a microfiber girl. Not only is Calvin Klein's 365 Microfiber Stretch Bikini the most awesome underwear ever, I have discovered that its male counterpart is gauranteed to drive me nutty whenever my man wears 'em. Touchably soft, hehe.

Posted by: annika at 05:38 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.

I Got A Question

Bronco Bomber says he didn't hear Pastor Wright's controversial sermon on the Sunday after 9/11. How is it that the Senator wasn't in Church on the Sunday after 9/11? Everybody was in church on the Sunday after 9/11! Or maybe he skipped church that day as some sort of statement, like not wearing the flag pin. Maybe he thought going to church had, after 9/11, suddenly become a substitute for true worship, and so he decided he wasn't gonna do that no more. Or maybe it was around that time that he felt his family's economic situation had improved to the point that he didn't need to "cling" to religion on that particular Sunday like 99% of the rest of America (including, by the way, the couple hundred America haters in Wright's congregation who cheered during his diatribe).

Posted by: annika at 11:55 AM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.

March 01, 2008

Help Save The Earth!

You may have seen a lot of applications on places like Facebook and MySpace, which promise to save the rainforests and stop global warming every time you click the mouse on their button.

I want to get in the act, because I care too. So here it is, save the earth, the Annika's Journal way. The more you click, the more you help save the earth.

CLICK HERE TO HELP SAVE THE EARTH

Thanks for helping to save the earth. If we all work together, we can do it. For instance if ten thousand people clicked on that button this month it could actually help save the earth something like ten thousand times faster than normal earth saving methods would. If ten billion people clicked on that button, we might have so much earth savingness, that we could build another earth or planet or whatever. Which is pretty amazing if you think about it, and makes me feel real good about myself and how I'm doing my part and all.

Posted by: annika at 09:36 AM | Comments (37) | Add Comment
Post contains 178 words, total size 1 kb.

1 EARTH FIRST! We'll mine the other planets later.

Posted by: Casca at March 01, 2008 03:09 PM (MQ9LJ)

2 Sean Connery recently started up his own eco-website to spearhead his new "Shave the Earth" campaign. Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at March 02, 2008 05:02 AM (0dGoX)

3 Kevin, you little weirdo. Crawl back under yuor rock.

Posted by: shelly at March 02, 2008 10:13 AM (wearR)

4 Woohoo! I just saved the earth!

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at March 02, 2008 07:39 PM (lYyjB)

5 Woohoo! I just saved it again!

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at March 02, 2008 07:39 PM (lYyjB)

6 Ok. I'm tired now. Someone else save the Earth. I've done enough.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at March 02, 2008 07:41 PM (lYyjB)

7 EMH: The girl tries to be serious and you mock her. Watch it. She has lots of friends.

Posted by: shelly at March 03, 2008 03:33 AM (wearR)

8 "yuor rock" Is that Chinese? I'm half-Korean, you little weirdo. You wanna wrightuh eenuh duh KOHreeuhn ack-sentuh, you happ-uh too DOO RIKE-uh DEESSE! Heh. Signed, IM Korean & I8 Ur K9 throw me a frickin' bone, will ya'?

Posted by: Kevin Kim at March 03, 2008 04:28 AM (VhMXe)

9 heh 'type="submit" name="Save the earth" value="Save the earth"' You could even do a 'value="reduce man-bear-pig"' as a follow up!

Posted by: Stew at March 04, 2008 07:03 PM (swd4s)

10 Yes, clicking little buttons don't help. And the purpose is not really to save the Earth, it's to preserve a habitat that will support human civilization while not creating a 6th mass extinction...whoops, too late.... With grain crops in their 6th year of failing to meet consumption, grain stockpiles are at a 34 year low. I don't need to tell you that fresh water is an increasingly rare commodity. And don't be surprised if oil hits $200 in the next 3 years; don't expect much of an economy, regardless of who's in office. There's more, like the unfolding North American natural gas crisis, which is the feedstock for nitrogen fertilizer production - over 50% of which is now imported - , the cornerstone of electrical grid stability, and the home heating fuel for 52% of American homes, but that'll do for starters... The Earth will be here long after humanity has brought on self-inflicted overshoot, it will just be a tad trashy until the aftereffects of humanity are subsumed again.

Posted by: will at March 05, 2008 03:08 PM (GzvlQ)

11 It's always entertaining to get the Malthusian slant. It just reminds me of the punchline, "Don't fuck with Uncle Mike when he's been drinking." Don't fuck with the USofA. Nothing unites us more than hardship. Like the man said, "We'll put a boot in your ass. It's the American way."

Posted by: Casca at March 06, 2008 10:55 AM (MQ9LJ)

12 Funny you should mention Malthus and odd references to boots, perhaps you've been drinking.... From the Financial Times (hardly a hippy hangout...) http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/62473c48-e4d7-11dc-a495-0000779fd2ac.html February has been the month for revisiting old and unpleasant economic concepts. Last week, financial markets experienced that 1970s feeling, as a combination of rising inflation and unemployment in the US triggered unwelcome memories of the decade of stagflation that ended the postwar golden age and the Keynesian consensus. Then came this week's report that the United Nations' world food programme might have to ration food aid. Set against a backdrop of rising food prices worldwide - global food prices have now risen by more than 75 per cent since their lows of 2000, jumping more than 20 per cent in 2007 alone - the news revived fears from a much earlier era, conjuring up the Reverend Thomas Malthus. Soaring food prices have also revived some more contemporary worries. When China's annual inflation rate spiked to an 11-year high in January on the back of an 18 per cent increase in food prices, China-watchers found themselves casting their minds back to the food price rises of 1988 and the social disturbances, protests and civil unrest that followed. Inflation is often cited as one of the factors behind the major demonstrations in 1989.

Posted by: will at March 06, 2008 02:49 PM (GzvlQ)

13 I'm always amazed at the quantity of supposedly educated people who reference Malthus, and get him exactly wrong. I had a professor, business type, who fell into that category, simply amazing. I guess they hear "shortages", and run with it. Malthus didn't say that we'd have shortages created by governmental policies. He said that we'd have shortages created by the population outgrowing our ability to produce. That's just not the case. We have the ability to produce, if only we could remove the heavy hand of the GOS-plan types, and the enviro-loons, from the tiller that guides this big blue marble. Alas, that usually takes a revolution.

Posted by: Casca at March 06, 2008 05:33 PM (MQ9LJ)

14 Kevin: I didn't say "Crawl back under your ROK", I said under your "rock". But, do whatever turns you on, you weirdo. We just don't want to know about it.

Posted by: Shelly at March 07, 2008 02:56 AM (wearR)

15 I want to know about it. I like Kevin. He's a funny and talented mofo. Now you on the other hand... clearly an acquired taste.

Posted by: Casca at March 07, 2008 08:27 AM (FzhYM)

16 Casca, for what it's worth, I read Shelly as simply busting my balls in a friendly manner. He and I have had amicable exchanges in the past. Shelly: the things that turn me on are here. I keep all that safely away from this fine-smelling blog. Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at March 07, 2008 09:20 AM (VhMXe)

17 Some cry over a harsh word. I didn't want you to wander away because Shelly had crushed your spirit. You'll need all your strength to fight off thw werewolves as you cross middle America.

Posted by: Casca at March 07, 2008 01:20 PM (xGZ+b)

18 > That's just not the case. We have the ability to produce, if only we could remove the heavy hand of the GOS-plan types, and the enviro-loons, from the tiller that guides this big blue marble. Alas, that usually takes a revolution. Bush and the Republicans have a had a free hand over the last 6 years, even appointing a Monsanto exec to head the USDA. In that time, agricultural production in the US dropped. Surprised? http://www.italy.usembassy.gov/pdf/other/98-253.pdf "The agricultural trade surplus, projected to be $3.5 billion, is at its lowest level in 19 years." --2006 data Wheat went from over 2.2 billion bushels in 1999 down below 1.9 billion bushels in 2006. http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/PullData_US.jsp All beans went from 33,146 thousand hundredweight in 1999 to 24,247 thousand hundredweight in 2006. Even the cattle inventory went from 2,281.1 thousand head in 1999 to 2,262.8 thousand head in 2006. http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/Create_Federal_All.jsp#top The land of surpluses is experiencing a dramatic drop in food output. And the shift to ethanol is creating a food shortfall, with food stockpiles at a 34 year low. You can rant about old arguments against Malthus, but current economists are now dusting off his concept; http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/62473c48-e4d7-11dc-a495-0000779fd2ac.html

Posted by: will at March 07, 2008 03:09 PM (GzvlQ)

19 Rant? Who's ranting? Lol, go find a mirror. You fail to grasp the nut of the argument. Malthus said we wouldn't be able to produce enough. We can. There may be shortages, but they are caused by government, and dysfunctional markets, usually caused by government. It's not because we don't have the ability to produce. Ethanol is a crime. Arrest the loons, and hang the congressfucks who wrote the law. Blaming Bush hardly answers the mail. It wouldn't matter who the head of the USDA was. We have fewer US cattle in production because of that union-thug bogeyman NAFTA. It so happens that the Canucks raise steers more cheaply than we do. So meat is in surplus, and excessively cheap.

Posted by: Casca at March 07, 2008 04:01 PM (MQ9LJ)

20 Of course they do. Markets are cyclical. Will, you remind me of a lot of the people with whom I work, absolutely zero retention. Go back and read what I've written, then take a pill, or vice versa.

Posted by: Casca at March 09, 2008 07:24 AM (MQ9LJ)

21 You continue to provide deflective and canned non-responses, so I'll leave it at that. Look at the data provided if you ever want to come out of your bubble.

Posted by: will at March 09, 2008 05:40 PM (h7Ciu)

22 And you boyo are a tedious ass, wrapped so tightly in your worldview that no light gets in.

Posted by: Casca at March 09, 2008 09:19 PM (MQ9LJ)

23 Oh, down to pointless jabs in an attempt to look witty? Ok, I join in the pointlessness, "You are so incredibly dense that light bends around you." A favorite one from my physics days. Your own jab would poke you in the face if you held it up to a mirror.

Posted by: will at March 10, 2008 02:46 PM (h7Ciu)

24 LMAO, OMG, ya got me. Now go away.

Posted by: Casca at March 11, 2008 09:14 AM (FzhYM)

25 You certainly KNEW the moonbattery would be in rare form for the whole delicious Spitzer meltdown! the Emporer Club was a Bushco fake Fed front company like Brewster Jennings was, you know, a fake company to lure in those they want to persecute Â“Look at the birdie! Nice birdie! What a pretty birdie! Come here birdie! Make the American people look over there birdie!!!Â”, cried the Bush Regime once again to divert Americans away from their own criminal cover ups Some of the Wall Street Robber Barons finally called in markers from Bushco. A U.S. Attorney did what he was told by Abu Ali Gonzales and Cheney, so he wouldnÂ’t get canned with the rest of them At least my Spitzer was boinking a woman instead of a boy or propositioning some undercover male police officer like so many reptilicans seem to do

Posted by: Radical Redneck at March 11, 2008 09:31 AM (bpQk3)

26 > "Markets are cyclical." http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/CW/M

Posted by: will at March 11, 2008 09:47 AM (z62e3)

27 Screw saving the earth: destroying it is so much more fun.

Posted by: Dave J at March 11, 2008 03:22 PM (jUUaH)

28 It's time for some AI posting around here. Are Simon and I the only ones who'd like to choke the shit out of Paula, and dump her ass out in the desert?

Posted by: Casca at March 11, 2008 08:24 PM (MQ9LJ)

29 Actually, I'd rather f*** the shit out of Paula, spank her ass, and take a dump out in the desert. But then again, I'd be glad to choke the shit out of Simon and dump his ass out in the desert.

Posted by: shelly at March 14, 2008 01:11 AM (Mx9HN)

30 Yes, but you've been disconnected from reality for years.

Posted by: Casca at March 14, 2008 06:39 AM (xGZ+b)

31 Wuhoh, looks like Radical Redneck needs your services: http://startelegram.typepad.com/sky_talk/2008/03/woman-files-law.html

Posted by: Casca at March 15, 2008 02:35 PM (MQ9LJ)

32 "There's something about Mary" on an airplane. OMG. Call Homeland Security. Years ago, on a flight to Amsterdam, my wife got bored and decided to join the Mile High Club. It was dark and there were three seats across and we had but two of them. Just about the crucial time, she shifted and the blanket exposed her (and me) to the lady next to us sitting by the window. Did she call the stewardess? Hell no. She took out her bible and began to pray. I was laughing so hard I couldn't finish.

Posted by: Shelly at March 18, 2008 04:19 PM (AiJXe)

33 I don't want to dieeeeeeee. And I agree with Will. All of us need to get off our lazy asses and help, but how? The world is filled with billions and billions of people! How do we get them to all listen?

Posted by: Alex at March 27, 2008 07:51 AM (YrCv4)

34 Look what you've been up to while I was off blogs and beef for Lent! Saving the Earth, pointless yet humorous arguing...Who's Malthus? Was that Russell Crowe's sidekick in "Gladiator"? So much for my liberal arts education! I'm still not convinced the Earth needs saving as much as we're hearing, but my kids are completely brainwashed by the school on that score.

Posted by: Joules at March 27, 2008 08:44 AM (28NFV)

35 Oh, that lady was just reading Song of Solomon and praying something similar might happen to her someday.

Posted by: Joules at March 28, 2008 06:19 PM (28NFV)

36 >The world is filled with billions and billions of people! How do we get them to all listen? Start with yourself first, then share what you've done with friends, family, and neighbors. Or start a blog...

Posted by: will at April 02, 2008 12:40 PM (GzvlQ)

37 is this thing still on?

Posted by: annika at April 17, 2008 08:51 AM (kKccv)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

February 27, 2008

Swedish Humor

Here's some Swedish humor for y'all. Hope you haven't already seen it.

Posted by: annika at 03:21 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.

February 05, 2008

California Voters Guide

Here are my recommendations for any of you California voters who have not yet gone to the polls.

For president:
Republicans - Mitt Romney.
Democrats - Barak Obama.

Proposition 91: Gas tax earmarks. Vote YES. Requires that gas taxes go to pay only for trasportation stuff, instead of into the general fund. Anything that makes it harder for the spendthrifts in Sacramento to throw money away, I'm in favor of.

Proposition 92: Community college funding mandate. Vote NO. This idiocy requires community colleges to spend more while reducing fees. Obviously its authors failed math when they went to college.

Proposition 93: Term limit reform. A tough call, but vote YES because it will ultimately reduce the term limit from 14 to 12 years, while allowing lawmakers to stay in one house instead of having to switch halfway through their terms.

Proposition 94 to 97: Vote NO on the Indian gaming initiatives. Don't turn California into another Nevada. California lawmakers need to learn how to run a state without relying on sin taxes to fund their never-ending spending spree.

Posted by: annika at 01:47 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 184 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I just thought Prop 92 sounded screwy. I have to admit I'd not even heard of it--that's how busy things have been--but when I read it on the ballot today I thought, "Something ain't right."

Posted by: Joules at February 05, 2008 03:41 PM (28NFV)

2 Annie: How an we be so far apart? First, the authors urged a "No" on 91 because it has been taken care of by a legislative method and is no longer needed. The Indian gaming simply takes money from Vegas and keeps it here; better our tribes and our taxpayers get it than Vegas. Lastly, congratulations on your first trial. When the jury comes in in your favor, it's better than sex, isn't it? Tell me where to send the drink.

Posted by: shelly at February 05, 2008 04:36 PM (d/RyS)

3 Better than sex? Shelly, you sure you're doin' it right? Not tryin' to imply anything, just... asking...

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at February 06, 2008 09:20 AM (xHyDY)

4 In true Annikan fashion, you waited until the polls closed to post your guide. I'm afraid that I voted the Shelly ballot. What's wrong with California having casinos? I'd think a free-marketeer like you would want all of us to have an equal shot at running a casino?

Posted by: Casca at February 06, 2008 09:34 AM (IrbU4)

5 We older folks don't fall for the ads as easily. Yes, Casca, better than sex. You can't win a trial every night. Be honest, can you remember smoking a gook with a perfect shot to the head? Good feeling, huh? Especially if he was trying to smoke you at the time. There you go...

Posted by: shelly at February 06, 2008 02:51 PM (wearR)

6 Wow...can't understand how you didn't see right through Prop 93. Often I look at the bill's sponsors to see who is aligning with it. The name "Fabian Nunez" jumped out at me on that one. I wasn't too pumped to vote in this primary, but I did for just one reason...to vote "No" on 93 and get that punk Nunez out of our state capitol...

Posted by: Nigel at February 08, 2008 07:49 AM (oVuTq)

7 Since Annie won't start a new thread 'cause she's still celebrating winning her case, here's a post Romney withdrawal thoght: Vice Presidential Candidates: Haley Barbour Rob Portman Lindey Graham Condi Rice Sarah Palin (hottie) Others? I'm betting on Portman or Barbour. Blog away folks...

Posted by: shelly at February 08, 2008 10:32 AM (d/RyS)

8 Anni (or Fredna, or whatever your real name is...) I took your advice, though my Virginia ballot wasn't a perfect match. And congrats on your jury win; you always remember your first... Shelly, Barbour would be too old-boy-network and drag the ticket down, too close to a Trent Lott type that would repel independents. J.C. Watts might provide a surprise twist and compete in D demographics...

Posted by: will at February 16, 2008 03:55 AM (h7Ciu)

9 BTW, have you seen La Lohan bareassed? Tried to put the link in, but mu.nu wouldn't take it. Do your own google, "linday as marilyn".

Posted by: Casca at February 18, 2008 09:41 PM (MQ9LJ)

10 Yo Bitch, no AI posts? Quit being a selfer, and share with your public.

Posted by: Casca at February 26, 2008 09:27 PM (MQ9LJ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

First Trial Result

11-1 for the defense. I won!

Posted by: annika at 01:35 PM | Comments (19) | Add Comment
Post contains 12 words, total size 1 kb.

January 31, 2008

List Of Reasons Why We Conservatives Need To Suck It Up And Get Behind McCain

Posted by: annika at 08:27 AM | Comments (25) | Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Looks about right.

Posted by: Casca at January 31, 2008 08:29 AM (xGZ+b)

2 Actually, your list is longer than mine.

Posted by: physics geek at January 31, 2008 09:51 AM (MT22W)

3 Skippy actually made a list.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 31, 2008 02:27 PM (USKv3)

4 Well put oh wise one. Why are Republicans (except for Thompson who apparently had all the enthusiasm for office of a tranquilized Dick Chenney, and Paul who's isolationism is too much) afraid of the conservative message? (And more importantly policy) The media feigns McCain love, and has sold him to alot of folks. It's largely a ruse and the affair will sour if he is nominated.

Posted by: Mike C. at January 31, 2008 06:11 PM (d/RyS)

5 Simple; McCain can beat Hillary. McCain is the Anti-Hillary; HIllary is the Anti-Christ.

Posted by: shelly at February 01, 2008 03:27 AM (wearR)

6 I think Shelly has it.

Posted by: annika at February 01, 2008 07:28 AM (xfjC+)

7 I will vote for McCain if he is the nominee. Until then... well I'll vote for the best candidate.

Posted by: Chuck at February 01, 2008 07:53 AM (FoYPf)

8 McCain won't beat Rodham. He's their dream opponent. As soon as he becomes the candidate the media will jilt him like the sawed-off runt he is, and everyone will hear the stories that many of us already know. You do know about how he dumped his paraplegic ex-wife?

Posted by: Casca at February 01, 2008 10:05 AM (IrbU4)

9 You know, I don't like McCain's business stance, I don't like a whole lot of other things about him, but if the choice is between him and Hillary, or him and the Second-coming-of-the-empty-suit (i.e. Obama), then my vote's for McCain, and to hell with his conservative "impurity". I'd rather have the impurity in the White House than the Hills or the Empty Suit.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at February 01, 2008 03:19 PM (xHyDY)

10 Nah, better to change the minds of a generation with another helping of Clintonian lying, than get the same results from a faux Republican. Hillary would be a one termer, and she'd unite conservatives behind another Reagan, just like Jimmuh did. McCain will destroy the party, and could keep us from retaking the congress for another thirty years.

Posted by: Casca at February 01, 2008 03:57 PM (MQ9LJ)

11 Yeah, and Hils'll f-up health care, screw up both Iraq and Afghanistan, and unless she listens to Bill, bork the economy through Kyoto and all sorts of other Leftisms her party'll want to implement by dint of owning both Congress and the house. Not to mention that if the US goes abroad again, we won't go in force like we did for Iraq I or this latest incarnation. We'll go like we did in Somalia: In force at first, then petered out at the end. And we won't finish what we start. I really don't want to relive the Clintonian version of Use-of-Force again. Look, Cas, I know what you're sayin', but I really don't think letting things go to pot is the answer. History shows that countries that allow their leadership to lead them to ruin tend not to recover afterwards. Rock bottom is not something to rebound off of.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at February 01, 2008 04:15 PM (xHyDY)

12 Sorry, Cas. I don't have another thirty years for sure, Hell, I may not have four. I want instant gratificatio, and I donot want to suffer for those four seeing her ugly face and huge butt and piano legs every damn day of my life. You probably loved boot camp. Even four years of Hillary boot camp would kill me. I'm voting for the maverick, RINO, over the sure fire Satan.

Posted by: shelly at February 02, 2008 06:46 AM (wearR)

13 McCain hasn't stabbed pro-lifers in the back. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yet.

Posted by: Mark at February 02, 2008 01:18 PM (fm7Bq)

14 Yup, I'm with Elmondo. Choose the least of the evils.

Posted by: Joules at February 02, 2008 06:00 PM (28NFV)

15 It doesn't matter if McSuck can beat Hitlery, because she is not going to be the nominee. The DNC is behind Osama Hussein and have thrown the Clintonistas out on their asses. Their time is finally through. I don't think McSuck can beat Hussein or Hitlery because too big a percentage of the conservative base will sit it out. No matter what happens, we'll be well on the road to MexAmeriCanada and enjoying the kind of socialized medicine that will bankrupt the country in less than a decade. Well done, ignorant voting masses!

Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at February 03, 2008 07:49 AM (b6+qN)

16 Hey, you forget this reason .

Posted by: S.H. Long at February 03, 2008 08:36 AM (AGm8o)

17 Preston, how can you be so wrong, and yet so right? Well actually you're only wrong about one thing. Bronco Bomber won't be the nominee. The rest is spot on. I'll be happy to take your money if you care to wager. As for all of you good Germans preparing to join the Wehrmacht, it won't matter. McCain won't win after the media turns on him, and pulls his pants down in public. The real question is, can Hillary motivate conservatives to vote for McCain? Come October, McCain's negatives will be as high as Hillary's. Can you say, "Keating Five"?

Posted by: Casca at February 03, 2008 10:20 AM (MQ9LJ)

18 Casca's right; Bronco's toast. The Clintons boujght the best time and the best organizers long ago. On Tuesday it will roll over him. We need to pick up the disenchanted and convert them to Romney.

Posted by: Shelly at February 03, 2008 03:22 PM (wearR)

19 Oh, I was proven wrong just about every weekend during football season last fall. And I was wrong about the 2004 election. So it wouldn't be the first time. The only thing worse than me having to vote for Romney in early voting a couple of days ago is the visual of McCain with his pants around his ankles. I may wretch.

Posted by: Preston Taylor Holmes at February 03, 2008 06:32 PM (b6+qN)

20 Let's speak plainly: if whites are a minority and Mexicans become a majority, then we can kiss away our Anglo-American traditions of freedom, limited government, and all the rest. This is the stakes: whether we stay in tact as a people or a new people is "elected" by Washington through social engineering immigration policies. That's why it's probably even preferable a conservative unifying figure like Hillary or Obama is elected and shot down on immigration than if McCain comes into power. His amnesty plan would be a huge disaster, and his lies in defending it only show what a bad dishonest president he would be.

Posted by: Roach at February 04, 2008 01:04 PM (kKFU6)

21 A friend commented to us yesterday that this election will tell us who America hates the least among blacks, women, Mormons and crippled old men.

Posted by: Joules at February 04, 2008 04:18 PM (28NFV)

22 Rodger weighs in: http://curmudgeonlyskeptical.blogspot.com/2008/02/silk-purse.html

Posted by: Casca at February 05, 2008 08:05 AM (FzhYM)

23 it gratifies me to see so many have adopted the moniker I coined: Bronco Bomber.

Posted by: annika at February 05, 2008 01:33 PM (zAOEU)

24 plus, S.H. Long wins the prize for getting my joke.

Posted by: annika at February 05, 2008 01:34 PM (zAOEU)

25 Actually, I thought the 2 periods in Annie's post were a graphical representation of the size of Obama and Hillary's testicles as compared to McCain's.

Posted by: reagan80 at February 05, 2008 03:01 PM (USKv3)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 30, 2008

Don't Forget...

With Edwards out, its a lot easier now for Al Gore to make his endorsement. And he hates Hillary. Expect an announcement soon that will be bigger than the Kennedy coup.

P.S. I will be giving my first opening statement in about one hour. I'm ready. If you happen to be on my jury, vote for me (but don't tell anyone I told you to.)

Posted by: annika at 08:48 AM | Comments (13) | Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.

January 24, 2008

Useless SWA Blogging

It used to be "ha ha suckas, I'm in group A and you're all losers!" Now some idiot has changed the rules and I can only go, "haha suckas I'm in group A, number 20!" meaning there are still 19 people who I am not better than, which sucks.

Posted by: annika at 04:08 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Yeah, but now you are a yuppie, in the real meaning of the acronym, and can afford to be one of the 19, let's just say, number one if you want to be. (Admit it Annie, it feels good to have the jingle in your jeans, doesn't it?) Money talks (like always) and, oh well, you know....

Posted by: shelly at January 24, 2008 10:46 PM (wearR)

2 Soooo, whaaat, you'd rather rule in hell than serve in heaven? That what you're sayin'?

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 25, 2008 05:15 AM (xHyDY)

3 I had a summer of hell, where I had to fly back and forth to Oakland every week on SWA. It sucked. I was pretty casual, since I was travelling for the week, but the daytrippers on business would be appropriately dressed for their task, blue suit & power tie. One morning, sitting in the facing seats, which are best if you wish to harange your seatmates in hell, Mr. La Jolla sat across from me, and began to sweet talk the lovely next to me. I knew he was from La Jolla, because he had to tell us all several times. During his foray at the young lovely, I chanced to glance down, and see a cockroach crossing the aisle from a snoring black fellow's direction, no doubt a denizen of the fair city to which we were bound, both of them. The roach entered our seating area, only observed by me, and I very loudly STOMPED him. All eyes were afixed when I lifted the bottom of my shoe to the others and observed, "Cockroach, headed home." It shut them up. These are the moments that warm my heart. I usually hand my drink tickets to the portly stew at the door, and tell her to keep them coming. Often, I'm served before liftoff. Heh, if you're going to be in hell, may as well be the drunkest one there.

Posted by: Casca at January 25, 2008 03:19 PM (IrbU4)

4 Why haven't you been on any of my flights? The movies usually aren't that good and you'd be endlessly entertaining. I guess the two most entertaining flights so far were with SDSU's baseball team and once in one of those giant military cargo planes, sitting in jump seats and wearing ear plugs while headed to Guam from Hawaii.

Posted by: Joules at January 25, 2008 07:59 PM (28NFV)

5 Just saw Rambo today. It makes the battle scenes in Saving Private Ryan look like an Airsoft match.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 26, 2008 12:49 PM (USKv3)

6 Hey people... you think Anni'd be pissed if I posted Lindsay Logan's (*snort*) name here, just so some fans'll find this on Google and post up some teenaged luuuuuv letters?? (*evil grin*)

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 28, 2008 11:15 AM (xHyDY)

7 I'm not 100% she's back to blogging, but it _would_ make for some interesting conversation here at AJ if you did. I'm not all that aware of the gossip but haven't noticed much Lindsey action in the magazines at the grocery stores. I guess Heath Ledger is the latest big story?

Posted by: Joules at January 29, 2008 01:19 PM (28NFV)

8 Wait, you're back?!?! I checked your blog hoping it would be back and it is! Sweet. I didn't post very often, but read religiously, welcome back!

Posted by: Rob at January 30, 2008 08:44 AM (mzUiR)

9 Yeah, Joules. Poor fella's managed to dominate lately. It's even got to the point where people are taking an old MTV interview as proof that Jack Nicholson had Ledger knocked off. Yes, the first posts had to have been jokes (they had to have been!)... but it's the idiot parade of believers that followed that shows how gullibly stupid segments of the population are. But anyway... this blog. I just don't see a mention of Ledger dragging in the pre-adolescent luuuuuv poetry that posting Logan's (*snicker*) name did.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 30, 2008 09:56 AM (xHyDY)

10 I wouldn't believe the Jack Nicholson theory for a split-second! I'll bet it was the pneumonia/recreational drug and alcohol use/sleeping pills plus doing a bunch of movies and breaking up with his family that did him in.

Posted by: Joules at January 30, 2008 02:20 PM (28NFV)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

If Anyone Was Wondering If You Can Blog From The iPhone The Answer Is Yes

Some say that when traveling one should never pass a restroom without stopping. I however, subscribe to the belief that one should never pass a Cinnabon counter without stopping.

Posted by: annika at 03:45 PM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Agreed, I do love the Cinnabon. The heart of the bon, after the mantle, where the dough sugar and Cinnamon become expedientially wrapped ever closer (like compound interest) , is my favorite part. Some of my southern friends think my taste is crazy but bon vs. grits? You be the judge. Actually just be a lawyer for a while.

Posted by: Mike C. at January 24, 2008 07:22 PM (AiJXe)

2 Er... I'm not sure if I wanna know or care what a Cinnabon is - sounds like something that subtracts points from the manhood scale for just touching - but as far as blogging from an iPhone goes: Of course! I've hit up your blog before from an old grayscale Blackberry, and can do it from my current color one. If a Blackberry with it's horrid excuse for a browser can do it, an iPhone with a real version of Safari can too. Now, if only an iPhone could do 1. Exchange sync, and 2. 3G instead of just EDGE, I'd say we have a winner. Till then, I'm going to be forced to stick with a 'Berry.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 25, 2008 05:21 AM (xHyDY)

3 Yeah, but do either of them have voice command like my Treo? Driving down the street and asking the phone to call someone, and further, having the choice of home, work or mobile makes a much safer ride. It can also surf, get emails and stores a humongous amount of names, addresses, phone numbers, emails addresses, etc. Also, the windows platform makes for an easy sync to the PC. When Blackberry or iPhone can do all that, I'll consider a switch.

Posted by: shelly at January 25, 2008 07:20 AM (wearR)

4 Since when is name-dropping blogging? Hell, it's not even commenting.

Posted by: Casca at January 25, 2008 03:20 PM (IrbU4)

5 The question of iPhone blogging is relevant to my situation right now because I'm trying to find a way to blog (and upload pics/vids) while walking across America this year (for more on that, see here). Above, ElMondoHummus writes about the Blackberry, and that's actually something my brother David has recommended to me for the walk. I think I might just put the question to my readers. As for Cinnabon and manliness, well... if you eat Cinnabons day in and day out, they'll shrink your balls and enlarge your tits like nobody's business, but I trust that most of the men who comment on Annika's Journal keep their man-boobs in check by practicing moderation. Meanwhile, Annika, keep eating those Cinnabons, and pretty soon your own balls will have shrunk to the point where you can just scrape them off with a razor-- no pain. Your tits might end up dragging thirty feet behind you, but I've heard that most women like the sensation of asphalt scraping their nipples. Shit, that reminds me-- McCain's mother is HOT. Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at January 26, 2008 07:56 AM (0dGoX)

6 But what will the ROK do without you? Are you planning on doing the full Forest Gump, or will you be shaving?

Posted by: Casca at January 26, 2008 03:52 PM (IrbU4)

7 What happened to Victor? Remember Wednesday is Poetry Day? Anyone want gluten-free blueberry muffins with gluten-free frosting and sprinkles on them? I'm baking with my autistic son. He thought frosting on blueberry muffins sounded good today.

Posted by: Joules at January 26, 2008 04:37 PM (28NFV)

8 Victor? Poetry Day? Gluten? Good gawd woman, we've got to get your screws tightened.

Posted by: Casca at January 26, 2008 06:11 PM (MQ9LJ)

9 Casca, re: Forrest Gump Looks as though I'll never live that joke down. Everyone's been ragging my ass and mentioning the Gumpster. What I need to do is stop in the middle of my walk and say, "I'm tired... I'm gonna go home." (I do plan to shave regularly.) re: ROK The ROK's gonna be fine without me. They've got a conservative in the driver's seat (his inauguration'll be next month); the country will become ever so slightly less antagonistic toward the US, and President-elect Lee will be doing his damnedest to turn the Korean economy around. So they'll survive while I'm gone. I do plan on going back there after the walk, though; university instruction kinda grows on you. Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at January 26, 2008 08:44 PM (0dGoX)

10 Hey Kevin: Is it true that if you drop a piece of paper out of a planein Korea, the chances of it landing on a person named Kim, Park or Lee is 90%?? Good advice: Walk across America in the Northern climes; some of our Southern brothers and sisters class Koreans into "people of color" in a way that will not be beneficial to your journey.

Posted by: shelly at January 26, 2008 10:43 PM (wearR)

11 Kevin: I love the heck outta my Blackberry. Stable, small, reliable, a real keyboard instead of a numbers pad... BUT, much of that love comes from the fact that I work at a place with a Microsoft Exchange messaging system, and that is what the 'Berry is designed to work with. My honest opinion: If you don't have an enterprise-class messaging setup to interface with, the Blackberry platform has no advantages. And the older 'Berries, like my 8700c, are not good web platforms at all, so it actually has one major disadvantage. (Disclaimer: I am a bit behind the times. I don't know how good the 8800's, Pearls, and any other model succeeding the 8700's are) Take a look at them and see if you like them anyway. But really, from having had to support PDA's at my job (not only 'Berries, but Treos, WinMobiles, and the like), most folks without Exchange, Lotus Notes, or Novell Groupwise are actually happier with a Palm or WinMobile. They're less stable and need more hard resets, but they're also not designed around Exchange/Notes/Groupwise like the 'Berries are. That help?

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 27, 2008 01:48 AM (lYyjB)

12 Kevin (II): "I've heard that most women like the sensation of asphalt scraping their nipples." Wait... so you're sayin' that when I drag 'em by the hair, I gotta flip 'em over and stay low for maximum arousal? Am I reading that right? I dunno... I think you're just tryin' to get me in trouble.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 27, 2008 01:56 AM (lYyjB)

13 El, aren't they usually comatose from the conk on the head? Walk across America? What are you thinking my boy? Now a motorcycle ride, I can understand.

Posted by: Casca at January 27, 2008 08:45 AM (MQ9LJ)

14 BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED!

Posted by: Strawman at January 27, 2008 09:43 AM (KnuGZ)

15 You klonk 'em, Cas? How're you supposed to have fun when they're unconscious? That'd be like rompin' the inflate-a-babe, 'cept you get the STD risk too.

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 27, 2008 12:11 PM (lYyjB)

16 Not at all, they twitch a little.

Posted by: Casca at January 27, 2008 01:56 PM (FzhYM)

17 Hummus, Yes, very helpful. Thanks. Shelly, The Korean proverb is similar to the image you conjured up: throw a rock in any direction from Namsan (the mountain in the center of Seoul) and you'll always hit Mr. Kim's roof. That's one reason why Koreans keep extremely detailed family ledgers-- so that when two Kims meet and decide to marry, they can confirm they're not part of the same Kim tribe. Casca, I've been thinking of taking this walk for a while now. Bike across the country? Nah, I've been sedentary long enough. Besides, Robert Pirsig had that covered back in the 1970s. Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at January 28, 2008 05:13 AM (0dGoX)

18 Riding a motorcycle sedentary? Hardly, and it affords one the ability to see so much more, yet, not too much. Walking, you're going to be seeing waaaaay too much. Good luck with the lions, and tigers, and bears out there. Most of America is still wild. You've seen "An American Werewolf in London", haven't you?

Posted by: Casca at January 28, 2008 10:58 PM (MQ9LJ)

19 Casca, I've heard that the average London werewolf is photographed by security cameras somewhere around 300-700 times per day, so I suspect they're being closely monitored. Perhaps London doesn't offer us the best example of wildness. I do get your point, though: America remains, alas, a country of free-roaming werewolves, and it would indeed kill the mood to be bitten by one and to undergo a lycanthropic transformation in the middle of an interreligious rap session. I suppose this means I need to think about acquiring a gun and some silver bullets, though I do wonder what the gentle folks in the Zen center will think when I lumber in with a .44 Magnum. "Any y'all fuckaz a werewolf? No?" I'll say in my best Asian Boyz Ebonics. I'll turn to one of the more frightened-looking zazenners. "Don't be shittin where you sittin'." Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at January 30, 2008 03:38 AM (0dGoX)

20 "America remains, alas, a country of free-roaming werewolves, and it would indeed kill the mood to be bitten by one and to undergo a lycanthropic transformation in the middle of an interreligious rap session." Oh, c'mon, man! You only gotta worry about that once a month! But them vampires... dammit, they're not tied into lunar cycles or any sorta sidereal phenomena. You gotta watch for thems all the timeses.

Posted by: A.J. at January 30, 2008 07:57 AM (lYyjB)

21 Dude, vampires are pussies.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 30, 2008 03:15 PM (USKv3)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 17, 2008

Tom Petty's Los Angeles

The L.A. Weekly has a cover story on Tom Petty's Los Angeles, complete with a map of several important Pettyania locations. Interesting, but I always complained that Petty, who moved here from Florida in 1974, was somewhat mistaken about the geography of his adoptive home. Exhibit A is the following line from the hit "Free Fallin':"

It's a long day living in Reseda,
There's a freeway runnin through the yard.

Um no, that's inaccurate. There's no freeway in Reseda. Check Google maps; the closest freeway is US 101, which goes through Tarzana, but not Reseda.

Next I'll take on geographical inaccuracies in the screenplay for The Karate Kid.

Posted by: annika at 10:39 AM | Comments (31) | Add Comment
Post contains 114 words, total size 1 kb.

1 I'll alert the media.

Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2008 02:19 PM (NmR1a)

2 BTW, I just saw Bronco Bomber in closeup, and I swear the mutherfucker is from outer space. Have you seen those ears? Those aren't real!

Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2008 03:22 PM (MQ9LJ)

3 ya mean the song's not called "Free Ballin'", cause that's the way I sing it.

Posted by: RichJ at January 17, 2008 09:52 PM (D0sPb)

4 Good work. By the way, I just saw Petty on Soundstage. He looked a tad hammered, but who can tell? Sounded great, except Stevie Nicks, who appeared with him, butchered "American Girl". Oh, and welcome back.

Posted by: Pursuit at January 18, 2008 04:58 PM (N155d)

5 Was it Petty who said "I'd rather have a free bottle in front of me than a prefrontal lobotomy"? Cas, relax. The Clinton slander and libel machine is hard at work as we speak. Obama will be lucky to get out of this campaign alive, let alone with his senate seat.

Posted by: shelly at January 18, 2008 05:50 PM (wearR)

6 How can I relax? We're on track to put an unelectable candidate at the top of the ticket. Alas, none of these turkeys can go the distance, except maybe Fred, and he needs to fire whomever told him to stay out until late.

Posted by: Casca at January 19, 2008 08:47 PM (MQ9LJ)

7 It's easy. Hillary can beat no one. Huckleberry is gone, but so is Fred. Next week, we find out if Flori-Duh wants to keep Rudy alive, but right now it is John or Mitt, with Rudy on life support. Any one of the three will beat Hillary. Go to sleep on this one; OSU is not playing Hillary in the BCS Championships.

Posted by: shelly at January 20, 2008 06:19 AM (wearR)

8 Yes, and six months ago you were prognosticating USC's march to Nawlins. I'm hoping for a brokered convention with Fred as the consensus candidate. I don't believe that Mitt & Mc can mobilize the base. They don't do a thing for me, and that's a problem. Hillary will have the union thugs out stealing votes, and that will make her formidable.

Posted by: Casca at January 20, 2008 09:23 AM (MQ9LJ)

9 Despite the fact that computer simulations indicated the Chargers had a 90% chance of losing to the Patriots (and some say it was 99.999%), I had hope... I don't think B.O. can get elected this time around and I simply can't conceive of a world where H.C. is leader of our nation. That's all I feel certain about at this point. I'm not sure Tom Petty is fully conscious during his performances but he sounds great.

Posted by: Joules at January 20, 2008 07:48 PM (28NFV)

10 It's OK, Joules; some of my best times have been with women who were not fully conscious. It shouldn't impair your enjoyment of the performance.

Posted by: shelly at January 21, 2008 01:44 AM (wearR)

11 C'mon Shelly, we can't both pick on her. Someone has to be the good cop. The Chargers? First you get a QB. Frankly, I think Volik could have carried the day.

Posted by: Casca at January 21, 2008 03:52 PM (MQ9LJ)

12 I don't remember saying I didn't like Tom Petty's music or performances and, to recap, he looks partly conscious.

Posted by: Joules at January 21, 2008 06:07 PM (28NFV)

13 OH! I can't believe I missed this opportunity yesterday! Shelly, it's okay that women have to be in an altered state of consciousness to have a good time with you. You're not alone.

Posted by: Joules at January 22, 2008 08:55 AM (28NFV)

14 We won't lose because all repukes worship the adam's apple of MAN Coulter!!!!! Tranny Manny Coulter, the face of the republican party, will be dead someday! *screaming laughter, applause, and whistling* I will be screaming at her relatives: TheyÂ’re using her death for their own benefit! TheyÂ’re nothing but a bunch of fags! IÂ’m glad some of them have cancer and despite the cancer, I will continue to attack them! TheyÂ’re using her death to promote their book on AnnÂ’s life for financial reasons and they donÂ’t really care about Ann at all! IÂ’m glad sheÂ’s dead and so is the country, but they canÂ’t defend their position on this no matter what! When MAN Coulter dies (I donÂ’t care if itÂ’s a horrific death or from cancer or from falling down the stairs because her AdamÂ’s Apple got too heavy), her family wonÂ’t be able to get a word in edgewise because my joyful screaming will drown them out! The reich wingers hate peace and love Ann. She is the face of the republican party for sure! She represents them well. Nothing but a bunch of Neanderthal knuckle draggers! Hey reich wingers, how many strokes went to MAN Coulter with the left hand, while the right middle digit probed your prostate? Laura Bush ran over her ex-boyfriend and killed him at Shrub's command! She served no time in prison for it either. She was dating Bush at the time, so that very nice father of his got her off from the charge. How many people have died at the hands of the Bush Family Mafia? If GeorgieÂ’s Daddy had done the right thing and pull his shriveled dick out of the grizzled old beast sometime in Oct 1945 and spewed that waste of semen on the rug the entire planet would have been MUCH BETTER OFF the last 7 years!!!!!! BUSH LIED PEOPLE DIED!!!!!!

Posted by: KayInMaine at January 22, 2008 12:12 PM (csq2r)

15 Wow... the reality based crowd just loves to epitomize irony, don't they?... -------- Anyway, back to our regular program. Hey, Cas! I'm in mourning. Fred withdrew (what's with the inability to post links??). Bloody hell... I knew he was a longshot, but still...

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 22, 2008 01:07 PM (xHyDY)

16 Oh, fuck this crap!! tinyurl.com/25823v And CAN MU.NU UNFUCK THIS SHIT??!! WHEN SOME DAMN PILL SPAMMER CAN LINK BULLSHIT BUT I CAN'T LINK NEWS! SERIOUSLY!...

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 22, 2008 01:13 PM (xHyDY)

17 I've been listening to waaaaay too much Dennis Miller. Like Claude Rains sez in Lawrence of Arabia, "Life is a veil of tears."

Posted by: Casca at January 22, 2008 01:18 PM (IrbU4)

18 Kay is Mainelining something...I don't know what. I love Dennis Miller!

Posted by: Joules at January 22, 2008 01:49 PM (28NFV)

19 Sorry, JOUles, i didn't say they had to be, I said thatsome of my best times were under those conditions. There are some women who find it difficult to stop talking, even during sensitive moments. Those women do better when they are semi-conscious. Others, on the other hand, like the lights on and can enjoy it all with no artificial aids. I like both kinds, make that, all kinds.

Posted by: shelly at January 22, 2008 03:34 PM (AiJXe)

20 There are some women who find it difficult to stop talking, even during sensitive moments. Say no to drugs, I have an alternate method. Gotta be careful though, or they choke.

Posted by: Casca at January 22, 2008 09:11 PM (MQ9LJ)

21 Did you guys see this announcement? 2008 Summer Olympics President Felipe CalderÃ³n of Mexico has announced Mexico will not participate in the next Summer Olympics. He stated, "Casi cada uno que puede fun cionar, saltar, o la nadada ha salido ya del paÃs." Translation: "Pretty much everyone who can run, jump, or swim has already left the country."

Posted by: shelly at January 23, 2008 12:25 AM (wearR)

22 I had no idea we were in the presence of two Zen Masters of human sexuality; although, you may be under a police investigation soon, Casca. Wise words. RE: Olympics HA! And they're training in my neighborhood. I see them coming out of the hills first thing in the morning, riding their bikes down the road.

Posted by: Joules at January 23, 2008 09:23 AM (28NFV)

23 J, as John Wayne used to say, "Every real American has spent at least one night in jail." Now that we live in an age where you can get locked up for hurting a woman's feelings, it's just a lot easier. I hope you didn't buy down there. Everything South of the 94 is headed into the shitter. When that happens, polish up your hispanol. You might want to buy a couple of guns too. On the upside, nobody will complain when you're firing them in your backyard.

Posted by: Casca at January 23, 2008 05:25 PM (MQ9LJ)

24 Hey, they'll come by for the birthday cake. That is, unless it is Cinco de Mayo, in which case you best wear your steel pot as the bullets coming back down usually claim a few victims each year. I figure Coronado Island is ready to be renamed any time, huh? Wait, they already named it, along with San Diego and Los Angeles.

Posted by: shelly at January 23, 2008 10:16 PM (wearR)

25 I have friends down by the 94. I've heard about how it is down there--mostly via Roger Hedgecock's program. The majority of Mexican people in my neighborhood are already established in homes--probably second and third generation--but there are more day laborers every year. The ones in homes are fine neighbors. Our worst neighbors are the 20-something white boys whose dad bought them a house and then left the scene. It's monster truck heaven and an 18-hour auto shop/bar across the street. But that Jesus Nava approached my daughter while she was out running several months ago--just a few hours before the police used the heat-seeking helicopter to get him for molesting a 13-year-old boy who, I heard, was also part of the established Mexican community and had already been acquainted with Nava. He's in jail but who's next?

Posted by: Joules at January 24, 2008 11:04 AM (28NFV)

26 Sheesh J, you missed the point. Home values will plummet South of the 94. Ever been to Lemon Grove? That's what Bonita will look like in ten years.

Posted by: Casca at January 24, 2008 12:51 PM (NmR1a)

27 Back in the late 70s when Tom was trying to bed my mother he had us over for supper. I was 15 back then and was in awe that we were going to be eating at a famous person's house. We were all sitting there and this tall lanky guy named Lazlo brings out a big metal bowl filled with creamed corn. He put it in the middle of the table and put wooden spoons in front of my mother and I as well as the older couple that were there eating with us. We looked at each other weirdly and started eating it. It tasted nothing like creamed corn, but we didn't want to piss him off, so we kept eating it. I took little bites though. Afterwards, when Tom, my mom and the older couple went to "play" upstairs, I had the worst gas I ever had in my life! I thought for sure Lazlo would leave the couch next to me but he stayed right there.

Posted by: Adam at January 24, 2008 03:54 PM (p4fx5)

28 Tom pounded your mom? Damn, that could'a been one ugly kid.

Posted by: Casca at January 25, 2008 03:22 PM (IrbU4)

29 Yeah, you're right--I was thinking about something other than property values. My dad's a retired Navy chaplain and I grew up trying to understand people and be compassionate. I'm really poor at understanding the practical/business side of it. I'm not trying to be sarcastic or holier than thou about this--just honest.

Posted by: Joules at January 25, 2008 07:51 PM (28NFV)

30 Not to pick a fight with you here, Annika, but the 101 does clip part of Reseda. In fact what would be considered "downtown" Reseda is only about 4 blocks away from the 101... I think Petty's larger inaccuracy is the claim of a "freeway running through the yard"...the Reseda Blvd. exit off the 101 does not take you into a residential neighborhood for several blocks. The "residential" section I believe is actually at least a mile north of the 101... I haven't traveled that stretch of the 101 for at least 4 months, so I'll give you a complete report on my next foray into the valley...

Posted by: Nigel at January 29, 2008 08:52 AM (uD0hp)

31 LOL Adam! What was that stuff?

Posted by: annika at January 31, 2008 08:02 AM (0ORZa)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 14, 2008

Little Known Legal Maxims

Blogus et billabae horae non mixerae est.

Posted by: annika at 08:44 AM | Comments (21) | Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Uh...little help please...you know, for those of us not schooled in the law or Latin...

Posted by: Nigel at January 14, 2008 09:28 AM (wearR)

2 Not even a little "pig" Nigel? Basically, blogging and billable hours don't mix, i.e. she doesn't get paid for doing this shit.

Posted by: Casca at January 14, 2008 12:31 PM (FzhYM)

3 "Blogus et billabae horae non mixerae est." True, but you love it anyway, right?

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 14, 2008 12:53 PM (xHyDY)

4 Do what I did: use the big firms for the learning opportunity and after, say, 25 years, when you think you're ready, go out on your own and resume blogging. Who knows if we will even have blogs in 25 years. Maybe there will be a mental cyberspace that does not require computers or Al Gore's internet, on which we blog by direct thought.

Posted by: Kosher Hedgehog at January 14, 2008 06:31 PM (0qXNl)

5 Blog and billable hours is not mixing. No, they is not--but vivir est blogare.

Posted by: Joules at January 14, 2008 06:35 PM (28NFV)

6 Annie: All work and no play makes Annie a dull girl. You can record the billable hours and still blog and have a life. Moderation in all things is the key to a happy life. So, here's the path you need to take - trial lawyers die young, because billable hours are everything. Find a specialty where you can bill for results and for your knowledge and don't have to rely on billable hours in order to achieve maximum compensation. Environmental is popular now, and looks good for the duration, but there are even subspecialties, like water, air, fuel, etc. Bankruptcy is cyclical, but really rewarding in this environment. Employment law (best from management side) is another good one. Or, become a house counsel and get stock options. You get the idea. Remember, you find time to do what you want to do. Omnia vivre in tres partes divisa est.

Posted by: Shelly at January 15, 2008 03:31 AM (wearR)

7 Amen. But shoot I'll buy a subscription! In fact, I'll setup a toll free number that you can call and I'll ogg vorbis to text for you. You can donate the subscription money to a needy cause. I'll even help you find one.

Just let me know know where to send the drachmas.

Posted by: Stew at January 15, 2008 05:43 PM (swd4s)

8 Fresh from his success with Britney, Dr. Phil would like to help you sort through your priorities so that you might achieve happiness and fulfillment through blogging.

Posted by: Joules at January 15, 2008 09:07 PM (28NFV)

9 Actually, I was taling about the pussies who lost to Illinios, and then took a SECOND, back-to-back crushing in the National Championship. (How embarassing; 31 unanswered points. Woody flipped over in his grave) But have no fear, the game of the year in the 2008 season may be the first one. Like I said, Pete will be ready, will Jim? Get you tickets early; it will be a sellout.

Posted by: shelly at January 16, 2008 01:27 AM (wearR)

10 First ya gotta get there, bitch. That means you have to be able to beat Stanford. On a very young team, that was supposed to finish third in the Big Ten, we've lost one Jr to the NFL, Vern Gholston. You better cowboy up for September.

Posted by: Casca at January 16, 2008 12:15 PM (FzhYM)

11 Someone would have to be paying attention to see how the thread above makes any sense. Go Chargers!

Posted by: Joules at January 16, 2008 03:22 PM (28NFV)

12 Hell, we're already ready. Trying to decide on which of the three outstanding QB's to go with and which of the five deep other positions we need to cut. And, of course, there is always the entering class in which we out-recruit everyone but the USMC. It's gonna be a very good year; can't figure out why we are only rated #2 preseason.

Posted by: shelly at January 17, 2008 03:41 AM (wearR)

13 My guess is that the insiders know about your impending NCAA violation announcement.

Posted by: Casca at January 17, 2008 02:27 PM (xGZ+b)

14 That flag is not going to be thrown. It is an OSU - UCLA - Notre Dame - Florida - LSU rumor that they use to discourage prospects from going to USC. Tressel should concentrate on not getting his ass kicked around in BCS Championships and quit circulating false rumors about pete Carroll. Don't worry, Pete has kids camped out on his doorstep waiting for 2009 and 2010. No reason to violate NCAA rules. Worry about this September. Bring stretchers.

Posted by: shelly at January 19, 2008 01:53 AM (wearR)

15 Gimme a break! Bush and his family take hundreds of thousands from an agent while he's in school, and the NCAA is going to pretend nothing happened? Oh yeah, that's the way you guys roll. You can't spell Trojan without OJ.

Posted by: Casca at January 19, 2008 08:53 PM (MQ9LJ)

16 Carroll and USC did nothing to warrant suspension; they could take away the titles, I assume, but who will that help/punish? I'd take away Reggie's Heisman; now, that makes the punishment fit the crime, no?

Posted by: shelly at January 20, 2008 06:22 AM (wearR)

17 The universities are supposed to be self-reporting. You can't tell me that USC's compliance guy didn't know, and if he didn't he should have. That's where the program is culpable. I'm not saying that's justice, but those are the rules, and I know how lawyers like rules.

Posted by: Casca at January 20, 2008 09:25 AM (MQ9LJ)

18 People don't need lawyers to tell them how to follow the rules, they can do that themselves; they need us to tell them how to get around the rules, or use them to advantage. Ergo, we LOVE rules.

Posted by: Shelly at January 20, 2008 10:11 AM (wearR)

19 That's why, if my ass was in a crack, I'd hire you. Trojan that you are.

Posted by: Casca at January 20, 2008 11:06 AM (MQ9LJ)

20 Actually, I am both a Bruin and a Trojan. But, after Red Sanders died, the Bruins never had a program. The list of coaches can make you barf. The worst of course were Pepper Rodgers and Terry Donahue. Then I was on the Coliseum Commission for almost eight years and could never get the Chancellor to talk aobut returning to play there, he was so pissed at being dissed by the Commission before I was appointed. So, I root for both, except when they play each other, and then it is USC all the way.

Posted by: shelly at January 21, 2008 01:53 AM (wearR)

21 Be grateful you have (1) a job and (2) a license.

Posted by: Mark at January 24, 2008 12:15 AM (RkNHt)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 10, 2008

And Then There Was Fred!

Am I the only one who thinks that Fred won tonight's Fox debate, by a mile? He picks now to sack up? What the hell?

Posted by: annika at 07:51 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 35 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Why wouldn't he? He's a movie star. Plus, he's probably the class of the field. Fuck, I didn't get to watch it.

Posted by: Casca at January 10, 2008 08:11 PM (MQ9LJ)

2 Better now than never.

Posted by: Otto at January 10, 2008 10:12 PM (7hzEq)

3 Oh, good! You're posting a little bit more. I've visited The American Scene and The Postmodern Conservative regularly. TAS is a great blog but I'm about 50 IQ points below those guys. Here, I'm probably about 25 below so it feels a little more comfortable. ;-) I keep thinking how lame it is that Hillary said she finally found her voice. After all these years? That inspires a lot of confidence.

Posted by: Joules at January 11, 2008 08:04 PM (28NFV)

4 Don't kid yourself Joules. It's a lot more than 25. That faggot from NYC doesn't post here anymore.

Posted by: Casca at January 11, 2008 10:39 PM (MQ9LJ)

5 But, that guy could return and he most likely will. One of the few good things that came from the "retirement" of Annika's Journal was not having to see his name again in the comments.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 12, 2008 08:40 AM (f3Oy4)

6 I tried to pick a number that would leave me with a little dignity but you saw through that immediately. It's highly likely the person in question _will_ return so just find a way to prepare yourselves. Yoga, drugs, journaling...oh, who am I kidding?

Posted by: Joules at January 12, 2008 09:17 AM (28NFV)

7 "Don't kid yourself Joules. It's a lot more than 25." So, Cas, if you weren't here, what'd it be? A lot more than 75??

(*Smirks, runs away...*)

Posted by: ElMondoHummus at January 14, 2008 12:56 PM (xHyDY)

8 Why run? You'll just die tired.

Posted by: Casca at January 14, 2008 10:10 PM (MQ9LJ)

9 Have I mentioned that the best team in America did not play on January 7? (Sorry Cas, I just can't control myself sometimes) That will again be proven on September 13. Pete will be ready, will Jim?

Posted by: shelly at January 15, 2008 03:42 AM (wearR)

10 Your shit will be in the street!

Posted by: Casca at January 15, 2008 10:26 PM (MQ9LJ)

11 Wait, you are talking about those homos who lost to Stanford, right?

Posted by: Casca at January 15, 2008 10:28 PM (MQ9LJ)

12 YES, I am the on who called for armed insurrection against this illegitimate never elected fascist vermin government! I am the one who called for a coup within the military, to save our nation and IT HAS HAPPENED ! The CIA NIE (IRAN HAS NO BOMB) is a coup! The plan by BushCo and the neocons was to sacrifice the entire Fifth fleet (10,000 + sailors) to stir America into tolerating and demading a "nukular" response on Iran and kill all the brown people. What we have here is a coup against the neocons, the zionists and BushCheneyHalliburton! When Bush raises the ante we will take to the streets with weapons!

Posted by: KayInMaine at January 22, 2008 12:08 PM (csq2r)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

January 08, 2008

Post New Hampshire General Commentary Post #3

Okay so I'm resurfacing because I just can't keep silent on what happened tonight.

Keep in mind that I don't even want Obama to win, but I hate Hillary. I didn't realize that I hated her until tonight. Before I just disliked her and didn't want her to be president. Now I want to stick a knitting needle in her eye.

(If I were to stick a knitting needle in her eye, here's what I think it would sound like: "pffft..." "AAAAAHHHH!!! AAAAAHHHH!!! AAAAAHHHH!!! AAAAAHHHH!!! AAAAAHHHH!!!" etc.)

Anyways. Tell me this. NobodyÂ—but nobodyÂ—predicted anything less than a five point Obama victory as late as yesterday. I'm talkin' Zogby, Rassmussen, CNN, CBS, etc. I know pre-election polls are often wrong, but the exit polling today also predicted a solid Obama victory.

Add to that, Clinton herself acted like a defeated woman for the past few days. She knew she was going to lose New Hampshire, because she was going to lose! Her crocodile tears, her meltdown at Saturday's debate, and Bill's tirade against the vast media conspiracy, all show a campaign that saw the writing on the wall.

Plus, I don't know anybody that thought Clinton's behavior since Iowa has helped her in any way. Everybody I talked to thought she was hurting herself badly every time she opened her mouth.

And all the coverage of the campaigning in NH since Thursday was all about how Clinton wasn't drawing crowds and Obama rallies were huge and energized.

All that stuff tells me that she cheated. Come on, it's the fucking CLINTONS, for pete's sake. They fucking cheated and you know it. These people don't care how they win; lying, cheating and stealing mean nothing to them. They're as Macchiavelian as anyone in modern politics. What did Bill say when Ken Starr had him by the balls? We'll just have to win then.

The Clinton machine was in a desperate spot today. They knew they had to win, but they also knew they couldn't turn things around that quickly. Electorates don't change their minds that fast. The only way they could do it was to cheat. But we'll sooner find out how Hillary made all that money in cattle futures than find out how she cheated on this election. I guarantee nobody will look into it. The media loves a horse race and they got one now.

Historians will write about how President Hillary saved herself with the spectacular New Hampshire comeback. But I'm telling you, this was the 2008 version of Daley delivering Chicago or Joe Kennedy buying West Virginia. Its the only possible explanation and it sucks.

Not that I want Obama to win. I admire him greatly, sure, but I disagree with him on almost every issue. I just want him to win the nomination. I used to think he couldn't win it, but now I think he can. I've never seen a guy generate that much passion and excitement as a politician. I want him to win because it will kill the baby boomer sixties counter-culture stranglehold on the Democratic party, hopefully for good. Then I want to see the Republicans nominate a guy who can beat him. Against Obama, at least it would be a fair fight.

Posted by: annika at 08:36 PM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 554 words, total size 3 kb.

1 A needle in Hillary's eye won't be enough. She requires a stake in her heart and a coat hanger jammed into her fucking urethra.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 09, 2008 03:55 AM (f3Oy4)

2 You're right, they stole the election. Just ask any Democrat--if you're winning in the polls--both pre- and exit--then you lose, the only explanation is the election was stolen from you! Obama should sue!

Posted by: Victor at January 09, 2008 06:40 AM (1oGDT)

3 Of course you are back; fish gottas swim and birds gotta fly...think about it. Well, I agree they cheated; mostly, the bussed them in by the busload. But, it was semi-legal and no one will be able to prove it. Remember, all the thieves are there helping; Carville, Begala, Daley, Burglar, Albright, trying to regain center stage. But here's how I see it; Barack is an out and out liberal, but a very clever, smart one. He would be harder to beat by whoever survives the Republican primaries, be it McCain, Romney, Huckabee (no chance) or Giuliani. If McCain maintains momentum and runs the table, I am boldly predicting that he will ask the convention to do something very non-conventional; nominate Joe Lieberman for VP. I know, it sounds so outre, but think abnout it - they beat anyone, especially Clinton/Richardson, which would appear to be the conventional wisdom of today. Anyway, that's enough for now. Welcome back Annie. I hope the law work is going well. Tell us about your new wheels and what kind of law you are practicing.

Posted by: shelly at January 09, 2008 06:53 AM (wearR)

4 I can find solace in this whole debacle in that Annika Is Back.

Posted by: jimbino at January 10, 2008 10:44 AM (czzEz)

5 What the fuck is this shit? Annie's been blogging again for almost two months AND NOBODY FUCKING TOLD ME? Fuck! And here I've been checking 6MB for anything new by Annie every few weeks. Fuckin' motherfuck!

Posted by: Matt at January 10, 2008 11:27 AM (10G2T)

6 I know how you feel, Matt. The only reason why I knew about this blog's "re-awakening" was because of an "Annika is back" entry at Skippystalin's site.

Posted by: reagan80 at January 10, 2008 02:18 PM (f3Oy4)

7 Ballot Box stuffing is a time honored Demoncrat tradition. Why do you think they own the inner cities? It's the easiest place to steal votes. Matt, you've got to quit hanging around with the company gunny.

Posted by: Casca at January 10, 2008 08:28 PM (MQ9LJ)

8 on this subject ,. alloy employees credit union australian carbon credit purchasing , this the most good site

Posted by: TibeDierneZef at January 12, 2008 09:11 PM (aZapg)

9 Hi everyone, Just passing through and wanted to say hi. Pam

Posted by: pamelakworkoutgirl at January 15, 2008 01:12 PM (kftyl)

10 Hello, annika.mu.nu I Was just surfing the net and came upon your blog annika.mu.nu IJust dropping a friendly line to say hello Anyway, keep the good posts up

that is about the cock ring Ciao sincerely, Diane My blog on

Posted by: Cruise Ship Jobs at January 18, 2008 04:35 PM (9jRxI)

11 Just look at these http://www.wowzamedia.com/forums/member.php?u=1282 http://www.wowzamedia.com/forums/member.php?u=1282

Posted by: Uritreddikers at January 23, 2008 04:49 PM (4Xfje)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

159kb generated in CPU 0.044, elapsed 0.1214 seconds.
79 queries taking 0.0904 seconds, 444 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 28298
Files: 23
Bytes: 259.8M
CPU Time: 9:59
Queries: 1107026

Content

Posts: 2168
Comments: 17090

Feeds

April 21, 2008

April 20, 2008

April 19, 2008

April 18, 2008

April 17, 2008

March 01, 2008

February 27, 2008

February 05, 2008

January 31, 2008

January 30, 2008

January 24, 2008

January 17, 2008

January 14, 2008

January 10, 2008

January 08, 2008

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds