April 11, 2004
Pansies

i took this photograph last weekend outside the state capitol building. i thought it might be cool to Van Gogh-ize it with PhotoShop.
Posted by: annika at
09:47 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Ms Annika - it looks like you may live in Austin? Pretty flowers on the rodside this time of year, especially with all the rain we've been getting lately.
Posted by: Madfish Willie at April 12, 2004 10:57 AM (hF7Sz)
2
blue bonnets all over texas...
Posted by: Scof at April 12, 2004 11:20 AM (XCqS+)
3
Whether it's Austin or Sacramento, I know it isn't Tallahassee. They dug up all the flowers before bleaching the building, and they haven't fully regrown. Apparently, they (whoever "they" are) cared more about harming plants than about people inhaling massive amounts of chlorine.
Pretty pictures, though.
Posted by: Dave J at April 12, 2004 11:31 AM (VThvo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Another Sporadic Huge Comment of the Week®
Hello, i hope y'all had a nice Easter/Passover holiday. This weekend i've been fighting two viruses. (Or is it viri?) The first is some kinda flu that i suspect i caught on the plane last weekend. It's weird. Usually i start with a sore throat and end with a cough. This time i started with a cough and now i have a sore throat. The second virus is a crappy toolbar spyware thingie that attached itself to my Internet Explorer like the monster in
Alien. i had to hack it up piece by piece to delete it. i'm still not sure if i got it all.
So that's my excuse for light blogging. But, i have selected a Huge Comment of the Week®, so i haven't been completely idle.
This week's H.C.O.T.W.® laureate is someone by the name of Anonymous, who commented on an old humorous bit i did way back on March 5, 2003, called Match The Idiotic Quote With The Idiotic Celebrity. i was pretty proud of that post, it being so clever and snarky. But this person Anonymous didn't seem too impressed by my humor.
so i bet all of the previous posters have never made mistakes before and find it easier to just put other people down because of their mistakes instead of look inside their own selves. im not saying that i like any of these 'stars' as role models, especially for little kids. i really dont think they are great role models at all for kids. but. as adults, i think its time we stop bashing things down and provoke change. its not productive to participate in giving these people money (however inadvertantly) by paying any attention whatsoever to them. to me, it seems as if all of you have bought into the whole cherade. i mean, britney, christina, allanis, paris, theyve all got you writing and making pages 'worthy' of stooping to their level and even discussing them. it just doesnt seem to make sense to me....... i dont mean to offend anyone here and id be more than happy to clear up my position on things, but im just amazed that this badmouthing can be any more valid than the whole entertainment crap. just dont pay attention if you dont like it. and if you really dont like it, do something about it.
i feel chided, i do. Still, i don't think i can stop making fun of people like Brittany, Kristina, Atlantis and Peris. i don't think i want to. It's too much fun. And if anyone doesn't like it, well, i refer them to
this recent post.
Posted by: annika at
09:11 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 449 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I go out of town for a couple of days and all Hell breaks loose in Iraq. Is it a coincidence? Anyways, here are a few random thoughts about stuff.
After a brief look around the blahgospere, I find out that a couple of days ago Instarepugnant declared the Sadr uprising in Iraq aint no big thang. No, really, he did. I have no joke, snide remark or even amazed “huh” in response to this, since I simply couldn’t top what that dumbass said.
You know, I used to think that all Americans were arrogant, narcissistic pricks. Then a couple of years ago I got on the internet newsgroups and discovered that it was the Reich Whingers who were the arrogant, narcissistic pricks. After a year of arguing with these rubes over the Iraq war and subsequent occupation, I really began to despise you. Now, after spending the past half year roaming through the right whinge blahgosphere, I just wish you Reich Whingers could be exterminated like vermin. Fortunately, the valiant Iraqi insurgents will do just that.
Unlike Kos, I have no intention of retracting or clarifying that last statement, so any Reich Whingers who take offense and cry can bite my shiny metal ass. Or they can stand still while I take my oversized shoe and squash em like the filthy roaches they are. To sum up, you Reich Whingers are nothing more than vermin who need to be snuffed out of existence, I have no advertisers for you cunts to complain to about what IÂ’m saying and so you can go fuck yourselves.
Over the next few days, the Sadr City Insurgents will battle the George Bush Infidels in game sixty of a best of nine thousand series. This one promises to be another bloodbath. My money is on the Infidels to take this one, but in the long run I hope the Insurgents will prove to have the staying power necessary to take the series.
As I write this, I’m watching “The Daily Show”. Why does a funny guy like Jon Stewart only get a half hour when that Reich Whinge shill, Dennis Miller, gets a full hour? Damn that liberal media. Okay, I’ll be honest, Miller is funny too, but only in his delusional fascism
Posted by: Robert McClelland at April 12, 2004 02:28 AM (WwSqc)
2
What a pleasant intelligent comment there buddy - really on topic too. Anyway did you see janet on SNL this weekend doing Condi, annie? I thought kristina doing Samantha a little while back was hilarious too. Nice to see SNL getting back to being funny. Not quite as funny as the delusional morlock commenting above, but still pretty funny.
Posted by: d-rod at April 12, 2004 09:28 AM (CSRmO)
3
i love it when idiots like that comment, D-Rod, don't you? They are so funny.
Posted by: annika! at April 12, 2004 10:03 AM (zAOEU)
4
Obviously Robert McClelland wants to make Huge Comment of the Week...
Posted by: Susie at April 12, 2004 12:05 PM (sf0L+)
5
Oh, wait--it's just a cut-and-paste of a post, or vice versa....
Posted by: Susie at April 12, 2004 12:09 PM (sf0L+)
6
Sheesh! It took JadeGold a while to come up with a new personality, but he really outdid himself with this one! And he managed to avoid his trademark keywords -- just barely. He's melded "Repugs" and "Instacracker" into "Instarepugnant." Clever!
Posted by: Matt Rustler at April 12, 2004 08:43 PM (of2d1)
7
Gotta be fair to Jade, blind vitriol isn't exactly his/her style, and Jade hasn't ever disclosed his/her blog in a comment. Also this guy's IP location is in New York not D.C.
Posted by: annika! at April 12, 2004 09:06 PM (9Llh6)
8
Y'know it is really pathetic to see a troll so desperate for attention that he resorts to cutting and pasting posts from his own blog into the comments section of other people's blogs...
He is just stirring the pot, trying to raise a reaction. Asshat.
Posted by: Desert Cat at April 12, 2004 09:23 PM (c8BHE)
9
Annie,
It's all just part of the identity change! ;-)
Posted by: Matt Rustler at April 12, 2004 10:21 PM (of2d1)
10
WOW, I feel so chastized. Ole Robbie really shot us full of holes. Opps, not that he/she would ever resort to violence, that being the perogative of right wing nutjobs like ME! Annie, I have posted here once several months ago, come by to get an injection of reality from time to time. I just had to grenade this clown, it was to good a target. Keep spreading the good word. Later, Darlin'.
Posted by: 2Hotel9 at April 13, 2004 05:42 AM (oV81M)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 09, 2004
Happy Easter Dumb-Ass Quiz
Which "happy bunny" am i?

Congratulations. You are the kiss my ass happy
bunny. You don't care about anyone or anything.
You must be so proud.
which happy bunny are you?
brought to you by Quizilla
Posted by: annika at
04:34 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
1
HAPPY EASTER! just passing by and seeing how you been up to.. bee quite busy as i can tell... funny quiz! yeah!
Posted by: maizzy at April 10, 2004 12:40 AM (rifMD)
2
I was trying to leave a comment to the post below but was getting weird script instead of a comment box. Oh well, all I was going to say is that Lee Ann has
the best cheese.
Posted by: Mr Mouse at April 11, 2004 02:07 PM (G5PGV)
3
Hahaha....this one is great and cute'ish.
I am the you smell like butt bunny
Posted by: Joachim at April 12, 2004 09:34 AM (T/uAh)
4
Welcome Joachim, i'm always happy to see a fellow Dane visiting my weblog!
Posted by: annika! at April 12, 2004 10:00 AM (zAOEU)
5
Fellow Dane?
I didn't know!
Posted by: Joachim at April 13, 2004 12:46 PM (T/uAh)
6
I can't believe I took this Bunny quiz.
Here's my results:
"you are the 'you're so dumb' happy bunny. you are brutal in your words and enjoy putting others down."
Well, if you check my blog (you do read it regularly, dont you?), I intentionally avoid putting anyone down. Even dumbass (oops) liberals!
Posted by: Mark at April 17, 2004 04:34 AM (7WTeb)
7
lol! I got the same one!

The one that has the lip prints on the butt! haha! Happy Bunny is soooooo KooooooooooL!!! hehe! Toooooodles!!! Buh-Buh-Buh-Bye!
Posted by: Lizzie at May 24, 2004 04:37 PM (pWVyH)
Posted by: Concerned Person at February 14, 2005 09:53 AM (/YjzH)
9
If it's Easter I think we should more be celebrating that Jesus Christ died on the cross for our sins so we could go to Heaven not Happy Bunny! He sacrificed himself with his perfect life for our sinful one and I think we should show him graditude and thanks. Also why do people swear just replace the word with anotherm it's not like you can't. Just a thought.
Posted by: Concerned Christian at February 14, 2005 09:56 AM (/YjzH)
10
wowwy sooooooo kool im the kiss my ass bunny i care nothing aout anyone or anything
Posted by: shannon at April 15, 2005 10:00 AM (v6kgl)
11
happy bunny rocks...to tell you the truth im all of the happy bunnies..no easter bunny but some HAPPY BUNNY happy bunny rox my sox!!! oh yah...U SUCK
Posted by: ash at April 15, 2005 03:00 PM (ywZa8)
12
HEY IM KISS MY ASS HAPPY BUNNY
Posted by: KAYLA at June 07, 2005 09:13 AM (M7kiy)
Posted by: Jani-Lee COrnish at June 26, 2005 08:04 PM (8z7bf)
14
omg!i hated it. IT SUCKED BIG TIME. take my advice and do something that dosenot SUCK BIG TIME.
Posted by: Melissa at June 26, 2005 08:09 PM (8z7bf)
15
I hated it.YOU ARE A DUMBASS AND iI HATE YOU.YOU ARE MAKING ME SICK.
Posted by: Josh at June 26, 2005 08:12 PM (8z7bf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Link Advice
Have you been reading LeeAnn, queen of the run-on sentence and a very funny writer? The blog's called
The Cheese Stands Alone and it's mu.nu, too.
Posted by: annika at
04:26 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
Good Friday
Today is Good Friday. There are some among my visitors who are religious, even religious intellectuals.
i found a dense article by Romanus Cessario, O.P., which reviews Gibson's
The Passion of the Christ in light of St. Thomas Aquinas'
Summa Theologica.
i must admit, i have not read Summa Theologica and i had difficulty following a lot of the discussion. However, there is a passage in the review that addresses one problem i had with The Passion, which i described in my own review when i wrote:
The scourging scene goes on for an unnecessarily long time. Historically, people died from scourging. It didnÂ’t take a lot of strokes to kill someone, and Jesus was whipped savagely in the movie. Though iÂ’m not an expert on this, i really do think any person would have died from that amount of flogging. There was so much blood on the floor after the scourging scene, it is impossible to believe that Jesus wouldn't have at least passed out, let alone believe that he could carry a heavy cross afterwards. We know that Jesus did not die until he was on the cross for three hours, so i think Gibson overdid the scourging scene.
Fr. Cessario's review addresses my problem thusly:
If one allows that the scenes of punishment exceed the modesty of the Scriptures themselves, or if we follow those who opine that after such beatings and harsh treatment, no man would be able to shoulder the cross or even walk, there is still the explanation that the artist chose this excess for a theological reason.
A long theological tradition supports this sort of iconographical modification: The Church asks us to ponder the price that the Savior of the world paid. Without this meditation, one cannot embrace the full dimensions of Catholic piety; instead, we would find ourselves moving rapidly toward those various forms of de-sacramentalized Christianity that focus exclusively on interior psychological states.
i think that's roughly what i meant when i said:
Thematically, itÂ’s clear Gibson wanted to shock the audience with the amount of torture in the scourging. His torture represents the sins of mankind. It looks horrible because Gibson wants to impress us with the magnitude of GodÂ’s gift to us. That was the director's choice. If Gibson had toned it down to a less shocking level, maybe we wouldnÂ’t get the message.
. . .
Nowadays, people seem to think that Jesus came simply to tell us to be nice to each other. ItÂ’s a pleasant message, and it fits into our overly secular world without ruffling too many feathers. But, itÂ’s not why Jesus came here. Remember, we didnÂ’t need Jesus to tell us to 'love our neighbor.' That commandment was already in Leviticus. But in our secular world, people have forgotten the real reason Jesus came to earth, which was to suffer, to die, and to rise again.
Fr. Cessario also points out that Gibson's intent was to show the divine aspect of Jesus, which previous directors chose to downplay in favor of His human aspect, perhaps because our secular world accepts His humanness more readily, and perhaps because it is impossible to represent divinity accurately on film.
Mel Gibson directs Jim Caviezel in a way that, in my view, approaches accomplishing the impossible. There are the Christs of Pasolini, of Zeffirelli, and of Rossellini, but the Christ of Gibson captures what these others were content to accomplish by representing a high expression of human values.
Although I am not an art critic, it seems to me that the very excesses, even the distortions, which some commentators have questioned, in fact aim to show us that this man is more than human. That we have to look elsewhere for the source of his human endurance.
i might disagree somewhat with the last sentence of that quote, because, as i said:
The whole point of JesusÂ’ torture and death was for Him to submit to it as a man. Using His power as God to withstand any torture would have been accepting the DevilÂ’s temptation.
But Fr. Cessario's article also got me thinking: maybe Jesus' endurance seemed impossible in the film because it was supposed to be the extreme limit of human endurance. Perhaps Gibson intended to show that Jesus, while rejecting the temptation to supernatural intervention available to Him, endured the limit of human suffering because He knew the purpose of His mission, where another might have succumbed out of weakness or incomplete knowledge. Just a thought.
Posted by: annika at
10:58 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 746 words, total size 5 kb.
1
Nice entry, one of the ones i'll print out to contemplate in a more serious manner after work.
Posted by: Scof at April 09, 2004 11:35 AM (XCqS+)
2
okay, almost done with my lunchtime lurking on your site...wanted to add this little gem I found:
http://www.brothersjudd.com/blog/archives/011944.html
"I remember being at a retreat once where the leader asked us to think of someone who represented Christ in our lives. When it came time to share our answers, one woman stood up and said, "I had to think hard about that one. I kept thinking, Who is it who told me the truth about myself so clearly that I wanted to kill him for it?"
Posted by: Scof at April 09, 2004 12:07 PM (XCqS+)
3
Great link, great article, great thoughts, Annie -- I like your concluding words in particular.
Posted by: Hugo at April 09, 2004 02:21 PM (LNc8S)
4
Excellent post Annika.
I do have one thought though. If Christ's only goal was to endure the pain and torture of the cross, God could have chosen any strong and virtuous man to do this task without sending his only Son. But Christ's mission was to carry the sins of the world, a task only the Son of God, or God himself, could handle. During his ministry, Jesus often performed miracles using his divinity, so I think to try and separate the man and the diety during the most important work in his life would be foolish. His mission was not for just an ordinary man, so why would the process of his death be?
I didn't count, but is did seem that there were a lot more stripes than "forty save one". But I think that Mr. Gibson did get his point across.
Posted by: javaslinger at April 09, 2004 11:07 PM (3rYmf)
5
"Just a thought." And a good one at that.
I don't think perfect realism would have been as effective in conveying the message. It is about the eucharist--his shed blood and broken body. If there was a bit much of both, it only serves to emphasize the point.
Posted by: Desert Cat at April 10, 2004 07:06 PM (c8BHE)
6
Annie,
I posted a reply
here.
Posted by: Matt Rustler at April 10, 2004 09:22 PM (of2d1)
7
I do not agree with you about Gibson over doing the scourging, because in Isaiah 52:14 (KJV) As many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his form more than the sons of men. I believe that it was a lot worse than in The Passion. It says that the scourging cuts through the flesh than as it is repeated it goes through tissue and cuts the flesh like ribbons. I think Gibson did justice for us in not making it as bad as it really was, because for me, it was hard to watch as it was.
I do agree with you about the raven on the criminals cross and "Satan" in the movie. The Bible does not say anything about any of that.
Posted by: Carol at April 26, 2004 04:18 PM (DA/cG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Poem i Found
i'm not too crazy about gimmicky poems that look funky on the page. i guess it's the lingering effects of trying to decipher too much
e.e. cummings in school. But here's one i found via
Ivy is here, which i really like a lot.
Click here to read Sunday Morning from the blog Watermark.
Posted by: annika at
09:21 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That link to ee cummings is the website for the school district i went to when i lived in arizona...
...but on to something that is actually interesting. I don't much go for those funky looking poems either. so if you bloggers would like to read a poem also called "Sunday Morning" then check out Wallace Stevens, the first 5 lines alone are worth it and quite pertinent to the going's on on this, Good Friday. He writes of "complacencies", etc being used "to dissipate the holy hush of ancient sacrifice."
http://eir.library.utoronto.ca/rpo/display/poem2017.html
...annika if you'd still like to read that criticism of Stevens I was writing it's almost done. I'm sure you are waiting with bated breath
Posted by: Scof at April 09, 2004 11:16 AM (XCqS+)
2
i was wondering whether you ever finished that. : )
Posted by: annika at April 09, 2004 11:47 AM (zAOEU)
3
...yeah i've got about 4 or 5 essays half finished lying around. i could use a live-in drill sergeant for a couple weeks...
another good good friday poem, found via NRO today:
The dripping blood our only drink,
The bloody flesh our only food:
In spite of which we like to think
That we are sound, substantial flesh and blood —
Again, in spite of that, we call this Friday good.
- T. S Eliot's "Four Quartets"
Posted by: Scof at April 09, 2004 11:59 AM (XCqS+)
4
Scof, i just read the NRO article from which you pulled that Eliot quote. The author, Thomas Hibbs, makes a grave error of interpretation regarding
The Passion. Did you notice it? Referring to the devil character played by Rosalinda Celentano, he said:
"This hooded, feminine-looking figure with a deep, sinister voice floats effortlessly among the Jewish crowd during the sentencing of Jesus, appears just behind the Roman guard overseeing the sadistic scourging of Christ, and then exults at evil's apparent victory at the moment of Christ's death."
How did he misinterpret that final scene at Jesus' death? That wasn't exultation, that was despair. i thought it was obvious, the devil was screaming in agony over its defeat at the moment of Christ's death. Only someone who does not understand the gospels could make such a mistake.
Posted by: annika at April 09, 2004 01:10 PM (zAOEU)
5
You're right, he does miss that point. which is
the point really. a number of verses make that clear, i.e. john 12:31
I wonder why Hibbs thinks that the devil thought he was winning?
as far as that scene in the movie, I'll have to judge for myself this evening and get back to you. I haven't seen the movie yet but am going tonight to watch.
Posted by: Scof at April 09, 2004 01:38 PM (XCqS+)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 08, 2004
Phone Call To My Brother
"Hi Mom, is Derrick there?"
"Hold on sweetie, i'll get him."
Long pause, then Mom came on the phone again.
"Annie."
"Yah?"
"Derrick said he's kinda busy right now. He's in the middle of something. He'll call you back later."
"What's he doing?"
"I think he said he was pulling his throttle body."
"Ooo-kay Mom . . . ," i giggled, "i guess he'll need some privacy then."
(Hey, what do i know about cars?)
Posted by: annika at
10:05 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 85 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Uh, Annie, are you
sure that wasn't a euphemism? There are already
so many of them but, at the same time, there's always room for one more! (Euphemisms, that is, not . . . chickens . . . or clowns . . . or torpedos . . . or one-eyed bishops . . . etc.)
Posted by: Matt Rustler at April 09, 2004 04:53 AM (of2d1)
2
That's funny, but i don't think he'd tell my Mom that! Anyways, he's always working on his car. So this was an opportunity for me to learn a little about fuel injection.
Posted by: annika! at April 09, 2004 09:01 AM (zAOEU)
3
Fuel injection...an engineering (efficiency) improvement but an aesthetic tragedy...stepping on a carbureated v-8 and the sound and feeling of the immediate power surge...goose bump festival. See the first 15 minutes of "Mad Max" for the sound, anyway.
Posted by: Jason O. at April 09, 2004 09:46 AM (QyDeG)
4
If my mother had known I was pulling my throttle body, there'd be a major stall....
Posted by: Norman at April 09, 2004 04:09 PM (sANa9)
5
Funny site, Matt. my favorite euphemisms are
Hitchhike under the big top
Launching the hand shuttle
Making the bald guy puke
Menage a moi
Pat the Robertson
Rolling the fleshy blunt
Shaking hands with the governor
Wrist aerobics
Yank my doodle dandy
i submitted pulling the throttle body, maybe i can be credited with inventing it.
Posted by: annika at April 10, 2004 05:36 PM (82/+B)
6
But what about "Dating Miss Michigan?" That is almost something that could be said IN PUBLIC with a straight face.
Posted by: Annie Nomous at April 12, 2004 09:17 AM (7UPKM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
If There Is Such A Thing As Reincarnation, Please Let Her Be Exempt!
i just can't stop updating you on Brittany's antics. She's such an easy target, and there's no shortage of material out there, since her every waking moment is chronicled for all to see. (That is, assuming the level of brainwave activity inside her head ever qualifies as a "waking moment.")
Here's a picture i found, showing what the American Skankwoman likes to read while she's laying out by the pool and sucking down Marlboro Lights.
It's a book called Wheels of a Soul: Reincarnation - Your Life Today and Tomorrow, by Kabbalist Rabbi Philip Berg. It was no doubt recommended by her personal Kabbalah tutor, that very classy Madona lady.
i guess Brittany's born again experience didn't take. Between smooches, Madona probably informed her that Christianity wasn't cool these days.
Fictional dialogue goes as follows:
"Baby, you gotta dump that whole Mel Gibson shit if you wanna be like me. Don't you want to be like me?"
"Of course I do. You know I do. Please help me be more like you."
"Alrighty then. But first let's see if we can't make you a little more like Janet."
Whispering and giggling ensues. Justin's name is mentioned. Some more whispering and giggling.
"Okay Madona, I'll do it! You're so smart."
Then we have this story.
P.S. By the way, it's just my opinion, but i think reincarnation is complete bullshit.
Posted by: annika at
03:33 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Wonder if she'll get past those first 10 pages...
[It's "Britney," though, I have to say before it drives me crazy.]
Posted by: candace at April 08, 2004 04:33 PM (v+gqT)
Posted by: notGeorge at April 08, 2004 04:46 PM (G5PGV)
3
Over exposed (literally and figuratively)
Minimally talented.
Desperately trying to cling to the last vestiges of their fading fame.
They're all the same to me
Posted by: Stephen Macklin at April 08, 2004 07:15 PM (4819r)
4
Another born again Christian huh? I'm sure honest Christians around the world appreciate having another hypocrite sully their name.
Posted by: glenn at April 09, 2004 08:39 AM (1oqLe)
5
To Candace,
Annika deliberately misspells the names of those she doesn't like.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at April 09, 2004 08:59 AM (w2ALR)
6
Annika,
I'll bet you didn't believe in reincarnation in your last life either.
Posted by: Fred at April 10, 2004 01:25 AM (lfy0w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 07, 2004
There's That Mysterious Zipper Pull Again!
What the heck does it mean?
Posted by: annika at
10:51 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm pretty sure that squirts crude oil at ya.
Posted by: Anna at April 08, 2004 12:38 AM (ToVhR)
2
Maybe it's some kind of cult, and the flower is their secret way of identifying each other.
Posted by: ginger at April 08, 2004 05:41 AM (eYQ9U)
3
He could tell you, but then he'd have to kill you.
Posted by: Dave J at April 08, 2004 07:57 AM (VThvo)
4
that kid looks absolutely THRILLED to be there, doesn't he?
Posted by: Lorie at April 08, 2004 08:24 AM (PPPwU)
5
Hmmm. Flowers everywhere I look...
Posted by: zombyboy at April 08, 2004 03:19 PM (If4Lh)
6
Yeah, the flower child probably only attended because he heard they were giving away free food. He probably missed the part about having to listen to a speech before the chow was served.
Posted by: notGeorge at April 08, 2004 04:54 PM (G5PGV)
7
I think this is photoshopped. I've seen pics of the kid sans zipper.
Posted by: Karol at April 11, 2004 09:16 AM (kUahT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Happy Birthday William Wordsworth
William Wordsworth was born on this day in 1770. In honor of his birthday, here's one of my favorites:
Daffodils
I wander'd lonely as a cloud
That floats on high o'er vales and hills,
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden daffodils;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.
Continuous as the stars that shine
And twinkle on the Milky Way,
They stretch'd in never-ending line
Along the margin of a bay:
Ten thousand saw I at a glance,
Tossing their heads in sprightly dance.
The waves beside them danced; but they
Out-did the sparkling waves in glee:
A poet could not but be gay,
In such a jocund company:
I gazed—and gazed—but little thought
What wealth the show to me had brought:
For oft, when on my couch I lie
In vacant or in pensive mood,
They flash upon that inward eye
Which is the bliss of solitude;
And then my heart with pleasure fills,
And dances with the daffodils.
Pretty, isn't it?
Posted by: annika at
10:17 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 181 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Thanks, Annika, I really need that today.
Posted by: shelly s. at April 07, 2004 10:38 AM (AaBEz)
2
Aries people just have a way with words.
Posted by: d-rod at April 07, 2004 12:07 PM (CSRmO)
3
There is a daffodil named after General Patton.
Posted by: Fred Boness at April 07, 2004 07:03 PM (r9vS9)
4
That's one of my favorites! Thanks, I had forgotten about it.
Posted by: ginger at April 08, 2004 05:42 AM (eYQ9U)
5
mmm, poem. you should check out the latest new criterion if you have a few hours, they've got a survey of the state of poetry in america, good stuff...i've got the pdf file of it!
Posted by: Scof at April 08, 2004 11:40 AM (XCqS+)
Posted by: Sissy Willis at April 08, 2004 06:58 PM (3yHhC)
7
Egad...Wordsworth, I mean...Gotta remember to proofread next time...
Posted by: Sissy Willis at April 08, 2004 07:00 PM (3yHhC)
8
..what about:
"books 'tis a dull and endless strife."
Posted by: jim at April 11, 2004 04:43 PM (lN8eP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 06, 2004
Advice For President Bush With References To George S. Patton And The Prince
i'm upset about the recent escalation of casualties and violence in Iraq. You know i supported the war and i still do. But we must win. i'm not ready to jump ship and start agreeing with Teddy Kennedy, but i'm starting to worry.
Kennedy compared Iraq to Vietnam. It was a foolish statement, and i hope to never see the day when Kennedy could be described as prescient. But i know all too well that we lost Vietnam because our politicians tried to fight a limited war against an enemy that used our reticence against us.
To me, there is one commandment of warfare and it is this: Thou must kick ass all the time. Americans like me do not want to see our side get hit like they did today. We're willing to go along with this war, but we don't want our best men losing any fights.
Patton said:
Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser. Americans despise cowards. Americans play to win all of the time. I wouldn't give a hoot in hell for a man who lost and laughed. That's why Americans have never lost nor will ever lose a war; for the very idea of losing is hateful to an American.
. . .
is hateful. No, we don't like to lose. Vietnam affected our national psyche for decades. That's why Mogadishu, even though we killed a ton of bad guys, sticks in our collective craw. And so will Fallujah, if we don't get some serious payback.
Patton again:
We'll win this war, but we'll win it only by fighting and by showing the [enemy] that we've got more guts than they have; or ever will have. We're not going to just shoot the sons-of-bitches, we're going to rip out their living Goddamned guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy . . . cocksuckers by the bushel-fucking-basket. War is a bloody, killing business. You've got to spill their blood, or they will spill yours. Rip them up the belly. Shoot them in the guts. . . .
. . . [W]e are not interested in holding onto anything, except the enemy's balls. We are going to twist his balls and kick the living shit out of him all of the time. . . . We are going to go through him like crap through a goose; like shit through a tin horn!
This is my point: we can pussyfoot around some more, trying to get these assholes in the Sunni Triangle to
like us, or we can start killing them. Yes, i said fucking
kill them. Now lest you think i've gone off my rocker, here's
what Niccolo Machiavelli had to say on the subject back in the sixteenth century:
When a newly acquired State has been accustomed . . . to live under its own laws and in freedom, there are three methods whereby it may be held. The first is to destroy it; the second, to go and reside there in person; the third, to suffer it to live on under its own laws, subjecting it to a tribute, and entrusting its government to a few of the inhabitants who will keep the rest your friends. . . .
We have examples of all these methods in the histories of the Spartans and the Romans. The Spartans held Athens and Thebes by creating oligarchies in these cities, yet lost them in the end. The Romans, to retain Capua, Carthage, and Numantia, destroyed them and never lost them. On the other hand, when they thought to hold Greece as the Spartans had held it, leaving it its freedom and allowing it to be governed by its own laws, they failed, and had to destroy many cities of that Province before they could secure it. For, in truth, there is no sure way of holding other than by destroying, and whoever becomes master of a City accustomed to live in freedom and does not destroy it, may reckon on being destroyed by it.
i'm not advocating the flattening of Fallujah (although if that were to happen, i'd not lose a wink of sleep over it), or bombing it back into the stone age, as some would say. i simply think we need to be a lot more heavy handed than we have been. In those areas where the yokels are jumping around in the street and taking potshots at our guys, it seems obvious that they haven't developed a healthy fear of the United States.
Machiavelli would have advised against trying to make those scumbags our friends.
And here comes in the question whether it is better to be loved rather than feared, or feared rather than loved. It might perhaps be answered that we should wish to be both; but since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved. For of men it may generally be affirmed, that they are thankless, fickle, false studious to avoid danger, greedy of gain, devoted to you while you are able to confer benefits upon them, and ready, as I said before, while danger is distant, to shed their blood, and sacrifice their property, their lives, and their children for you; but in the hour of need they turn against you. . . .
Moreover, men are less careful how they offend him who makes himself loved than him who makes himself feared. For love is held by the tie of obligation, which, because men are a sorry breed, is broken on every whisper of private interest; but fear is bound by the apprehension of punishment which never relaxes its grasp.
We will never win the love of the people who hate us by anything we do. Nor will we win the support of the pansies in Europe by being gentle with our enemies. We need to instill fear into them, by killing them. And, in my opinion, we need more troops over there until the crazies in the Triangle understand the score. This Rumsfeld idea of doing things on the cheap is not looking too good right about now.
Machiavelli cautioned that fear should be distinct from hate. i don't know what he'd say about a people who already hate the new prince, but haven't learned to fear him yet. But Machiavelli's formula for instilling fear while staying clear of hatred is a do-able one, in Iraq.
[A] Prince should inspire fear in such a fashion that if he do not win love he may escape hate. For a man may very well be feared and yet not hated, and this will be the case so long as he does not meddle with the property or with the women of his citizens and subjects. And if constrained to put any to death, he should do so only when there is manifest cause or reasonable justification. But, above all, he must abstain from the property of others. For men will sooner forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony. Moreover, pretexts for confiscation are never to seek, and he who has once begun to live by rapine always finds reasons for taking what is not his; whereas reasons for shedding blood are fewer, and sooner exhausted.
Don't mess with their property, don't mess with their women. We're not doing either of those things. So far so good. In fact we're fixing their property and soon they should be on their way to creating more of their own property and wealth, thanks to us.
But the final step of my Machiavellian advice to Bush is one that i'm worried about. Bush has shown an incredible amount of strength and leadership getting us this far, and changing the Middle East in such a fundamental way. i hope he's got the guts to start really kicking ass now, when it's necessary. Because unless the regime holdouts and terrorist assholes start fearing massive retaliation, i'm afraid they're not going to stop killing our guys. And if we don't stop them, they win.
Update: Guess i spoke too soon about messing with their property. Oops! LMAO.
Posted by: annika at
06:32 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 1389 words, total size 8 kb.
1
I suspect that comments may be few and far between for this particular post. So, lemme just say: great work Anni!!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at April 06, 2004 08:21 PM (H7OBy)
2
Annie,
First of all the last thing Bush or any other damn Pres of this country needs to be thinking is, "What would Machiavelli do?"
There is a difference between being an occupying force & a liberating one. The goals of each are different as are the methods ideal for the achievement of those goals. The first step is to decide which one we are * then move accordingly.
Now for all practical purposes we seem to be in the occupying force role. This is akward 'cause we started out as a liberating force but that's another subject. So as an occupying force that is under increasing attack from the locals we can do a few things. The most pressing is to increase the size of our patrols over there. It won't stop the attacks but it'll give us a better chance of taking as many losses & an even better chance of capturing or killing the attackers. The next thing we need to do is start weening the locals on doing whatever it is we're doing there. Increase the numbers of Iraqi's involved in the patrols. Hell I'd be all for setting up a militia system over there if it wouldn't freak "no guns for the people" Bremer out. If you make the people understand they're being attacked as well as the occupying force then you stand a chance of cutting popular support for the attackers.
But as it relates to Iraq specifically we need to speed up the process we're supposed to be working on, which is handing things back to the locals. Now personally I think it's a bad idea to liberate people who won't liberate themselves (yes, I know Hussein had opposition in some regions, but not much to speak of) which is why I've always been opposed to invading California or Chicago or NYC or Boulder. But the fact is we're there & there will be some people who are violently opposed to it. What we should do is leave the Iraqi's to handle their own business. Get Bremer & the Corps & the Army & all other troops out of the country the second we can. Now yes we should hang around until the Iraqi's are able to handle things themselves, but if we use attacks by people & groups opposed to Hussein's downfall as a justification we'll be there for the next 50 years. & the longer we do stay the more we look like an occupying force than a liberating force to many people.
If the Iraqi's want freedom then they can have it. If they want another Hussein they can have that too. Yes, the latter would suck for them but freedom includes making bad choices as well as good.
Oh & about Viet-nam... it wasn't just that we didn't give the troops over there enough support or a clear direction (althought those were big problems) it was that the politics at home affected the way the troops acted abroad. Little thought was given to the way to achieve the objectives in the beginning. It was just assumed that Americans will kick their asses & that'll strike fear in commie hearts worldwide. Hey - looked good on paper at the time, so why not? & you have to remember these were the people who thought giving front line troops a mickey mouse looking piece of shit that won't humanely kill deer was a good idea.
Now we could have won the war itself eventually but again I question the wisdom of getting involved in other people's affairs. That aside we lost Vietnam because domestic political conerns outweighed the foreign political concerns we were supposed to be fighting for. If they understood what was going on in Viet-Nam they didn't care.
which lead to the reasons you state. You weren't wrong by any means, it's just I'd much rather examine the cause instead of merely changing the effect.
But please - no more Machiavelli for Bush. From where I sit he's had too much Machiavellian advice already. Tell him about Chief Joseph or Jefferson or any one of the Adams boys. Tell him about George Mason or Locke or Cesare Beccaria. Tell him about Tacitus or Mencken. Tell him about Paine & Andrew Fletcher. You know, people he could & should learn from.
& just for me, tell him what Patton would think of the M16/M4.
Posted by: Publicola at April 06, 2004 09:23 PM (Aao25)
3
The Roman Army would have killed all the malesand sold the women and children into salvery. Maybe they had a good point.
Posted by: Chuck at April 06, 2004 10:07 PM (s6c4t)
4
Like so much else you write, Annika, I nearly swoon.
As for liberating and occupying. Look, we were stupid for making such an emphasis on liberation. Moreover we were there not to liberate Saddam's Sunni cronies, but everyone else. The "hearts and minds" campaingn must be aimed at the undecided, who are now few, not our arch-enemies.
Posted by: roach at April 06, 2004 10:21 PM (DHoAQ)
5
As always, Annika dear, I disagree but am impressed -- best thing since your Pepys evening a while back! Here is the ONE thing that had me saying "amen":
This Rumsfeld idea of doing things on the cheap is not looking too good right about now.
Posted by: Hugo at April 07, 2004 09:02 AM (LNc8S)
6
Fallujah Delenda Est
http://www.newsmax.com/cgi-bin/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/4/2/100042.shtml
The above is a wonderful reference to Cato's problem with the Cathaginians, and his solution.
Each day of this uprising leads me to believe that the author, Jack Wheeler (and Cato) were right on the money.
Posted by: Shelly S. at April 07, 2004 10:49 AM (AaBEz)
7
Is it just me, or is it suddenly getting hot in here???
Excellent job - it's good to remember we are discussing the military, not a police force.
Beauty and Brains - maybe that cloning stuff isn't such a bad idea after all...
Posted by: John at April 07, 2004 02:32 PM (7UPKM)
8
George Mason and Co. were either Christians, which Islamists are NOT, or Greeks, which got swallowed up by Islamists when the Byzantine Empire died. The religion of Islam is convert or die.
Well, then, we show them we understand the message. LOUD AND CLEAR.
Posted by: Cricket at April 07, 2004 03:31 PM (Ie8+U)
9
Prescient? Sent me to the dictionary couldnÂ’t find it. Anyway, Ted Kennedy is wrong to call this war a Vietnam. You should never give suicidal enemies a reason to kill our soldiers in the hopes that we will retreat. Ted Kennedy just prolonged the war and increased the body count on both sides
Posted by: steve at April 07, 2004 04:02 PM (ifByZ)
Posted by: annika! at April 07, 2004 05:03 PM (zAOEU)
11
And wasn't it Harry S. Truman who said "Drop that damn A bomb on 'em, and if them Japs don't surrender, keep droppin' one on 'em every day or so until they
do surrender, dammit!"?

Oops, I think that one might not have made the papers, yet. I guess I just blew my
Top Secret Clearance all to Hell, huh? Sorry Condoleezza*, but he
was a Democrat afterall.
*
Don't ya really hate it when ya have to look up a news story just to find the correct spellin' of a name of someone?
Posted by: notGeorge at April 08, 2004 05:03 PM (G5PGV)
Posted by: Attila Girl at April 09, 2004 10:43 PM (SYwua)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
The Dumbest Of All Dumb-Ass Quizzes

The Completely Pointless Personality Quiz
Thanks, Lemur Girl!
Posted by: annika at
10:49 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I scored 57%...I am an EXERCISE WHEEL. Should I be afraid?
spark21
Posted by: spark21 at April 07, 2004 08:47 PM (iI//A)
2
A "Bucket of Chicken"....I am really not sure HOW to take that.....
Posted by: Courtney at April 08, 2004 08:28 AM (tyQ8y)
3
No worries

though i still don't understand how i get to be three people at once!
AxXx
Posted by: Lemurgirl at April 08, 2004 08:49 AM (DS0qC)
4
Wooohooo, I am a cinnamon roll -- 36%, which is much higher than I scored on my first Calculus examine in college* ... I knew someone had to be impressed with at least one of my buns.
*
Whis is the reason why I ended up being an attorney instead of a rocket scientist, I suppose.**
**
I am still of the opinion that I would have done much better at Calculus if the college had not been outsourcing the teaching positions to very poor English speaking people from India and China.
Posted by: notGeorge at April 08, 2004 05:16 PM (G5PGV)
5
OFFICIAL 2004 REPUBLICAN NATION CONVENTION PROGRAM
6:00 pm Opening Cross Burning Ceremony (Hoods optional).
6:30 pm Prayer by the flag pole.
6:40 pm N.R.A. pigeon shoot.
7:00 pm Prayer led by Charlton Heston
7:10 pm W.M.D. scavenger hunt.
7:20 pm Prayer led by Pat Robertson. 700 club donation drive.
7:25 pm (Men only) Army of God rally. (Women only) Dishwasher Demo.
7:45 pm Prayer led by Jerry Falwell and Tinky-Winky burning.
8:00 pm Fred Phelps Gay bashing rally by the barbed wire fence.
8:25 pm Prayer led by Fred Phelps
8:30 pm Workshops: (Men only) “WHITE POWER“ (Women only)“Home schooling your Children”
9:00 pm NRAÂ’s history of the KKK led by Trent Lott in memory of Strohm Thurman
9:30 pm Intermission
10:00 pm Cross burning ceremony no. 2 (Hoods a Must!)
10:15 pm George Bush lands in a fighter jet. (only men under 5’5” on flight deck please).
10:30 pm George Bush speech “dow der der helldo my people, yeah well, I can hear ya’ll”!!!!!!!
10:40 pm Prayer led by Dick
10:50 pm Pledge of allegiance to Saudi Arabia led by Halliburton
11:00 pm Collect offerings for future attacks on abortion clinics
11:20 pm George Bush presents W.M.D. in France (Backup: France is better off without Chirac)
11:30 pm Enron rally led by Halliburton
11:45 pm Workshop: “Maximizing a Police State” led By John Ashcroft
11:59 pm Prayer led by Bush
12:00 am Nomination of the Republican candidate
Posted by: kg at April 27, 2004 06:49 AM (YwYPN)
6
Hello......................Good-Bye.................!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: UR MOM at April 30, 2004 11:04 AM (tU5Mu)
7
wow stupid quiz!!!!! im a toilet then i took it again and now im rubber dog poo?? but i answered the same questions?!?!!
Posted by: dazed and confused at December 19, 2004 01:35 PM (ywZa8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
This Is Funny
Look at this, it's funny.
Posted by: annika at
10:38 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 11 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: candace at April 06, 2004 02:18 PM (v+gqT)
2
Funny indeed -- except as much as I still love Joe Montana, I don't want him to be president... give me a good marathoner any day; they have what it takes to lead.
Posted by: Hugo at April 06, 2004 03:06 PM (LNc8S)
3
Kerry looks like an ex-lineman:
No hands.
Actually, I doubt Kerry ever played football, I mean real football where you have to stick your face in someone's chest, not the Kennedy-flag-football-for-Pierre-Salinger's-camera version.
Posted by: Jason O. at April 07, 2004 10:45 AM (QyDeG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 01, 2004
Today's Bleat
i usually don't link to Lileks, because i assume everybody is reading him anyway. However . . . Today's Bleat is in the top ten percent of the most brilliant things Lileks has ever written, IMHO. Let me add my voice to the multitude of bloggers out there who are saying: "
read it."
Posted by: annika at
01:49 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
1
There is a problem is on Lilek's site. The permalink for April 1 takes you to an old column on "The Passion." Might be some kind of April Fools' joke.
Here is the generic link to Lilek's bleat. It is currently the only way to get to the article on John Kerry- http://www.lileks.com/bleats/
I highly recommend the article. Lileks takes John Kerry apart.
Posted by: gcotharn in Texas at April 01, 2004 03:56 PM (0GNJF)
2
Oh, and HAPPY BIRTHDAY ANNIKA!!!!!!!
Posted by: gcotharn in Texas at April 01, 2004 03:59 PM (0GNJF)
3
happy belated birthday annika.... i hope you had a good one... just a tid... my godchild's mom's b-day is the 1st too.... on Arpil fool's day... yeah... on top you are an ARIES!!! good for you... take care... ^_^
Posted by: maizzy at April 05, 2004 11:21 AM (LOkWF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Air America
i'm leaving for lunch in a few minutes and i intend to get into my car and see if i can pick up
Air America Radio. i haven't been able to tune them in at work because AM reception is sketchy inside our building.
i checked out the website. What a loser line up. Jeannine Garofalo? Al Franklin might be amusing, but Garofalo has always been so inarticulate whenever i've heard her on talk shows. She displays all the rhetorical problems of amateur leftist pundits. Dodge, change the subject, ad hominem, change the subject, say something idiotic, when challenged on it, claim you were joking, change the subject, talk over your opponent, change the subject, claim your opponent won't let you speak then refuse to answer their question, change the subject, etc., etc. . . .
And Chuck D? That's the best they could do? Two comedians and a rapper?
Some say that the liberal network is bound to fail. i disagree. The liberal media have a vested interest in propping it up. They won't let it fail, even if it sucks and no one listens. An analogous example is the WNBA. Even though WNBA games play in empty arenas, and nobody watches it on TV because it's boring basketball, the league just won't die. Nobody wants to pull the plug because it wouldn't be PC. So they keep trying to ram womens pro ball down our throats, long after sports fans have rejected it.
Update: Well, i listened to part of Al Franklin's show and i was so impressed, i can't tell you. The man is brilliant. Even though he focused solely on bashing Bush and the administration along with conservative talk show hosts, and he never mentioned Kerry, Franklin inspired me to change my way of thinking totally. i now plan to vote for John Kerry and i am re-registering as a Democrat. i am now a liberal. Thank you, Al Franklin!
more...
Posted by: annika at
11:59 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 346 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Shouldn't April Fool's jokes be at least somewhat believable? ;-)
Posted by: Dave J at April 01, 2004 01:41 PM (VThvo)
2
Happy b-day.

I have to agree with Dave J; you going Dem would be as believable as me blogging for stricter gun control laws, or favoring the M16 over the Garand.
But it was a nice try though.
Posted by: Publicola at April 01, 2004 02:52 PM (Aao25)
3
HaHa.. Next thing you be telling us that you and Frank J. just got hitched at McDonalds or something. Happy birthday!
Posted by: d-rod at April 01, 2004 03:34 PM (CSRmO)
4
Saeng-il ch'uk-ha heyo!
Happy Birthday!
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at April 01, 2004 07:47 PM (w2ALR)
5
How miserable a cause they have when they are using Janeane Garofalo as mouth piece. A more uninformed idiot would be hard to find.
(Well, no. Hollywood is full of 'em.)
Posted by: Mark at April 01, 2004 08:59 PM (oC8m2)
6
LMAO!!! Janeane Garofalo had potential to be a human being. About eight years ago. Pity.
And, please accept my humble apologies for missing your birthday. I hope it was a blast!
Posted by: emma at April 02, 2004 12:45 AM (kpNlZ)
7
Garofalo's career peak was the Sheriff's deputy in Cop Land....great movie, BTW.
But not the best looking plant in the store...I'd probably sleep with Chuck D before Garofalo.
Remember the Al Franken heckler bodyslam? Does anyone know why he was not prosecuted for assault and battery?
Posted by: Jason O. at April 02, 2004 09:24 AM (QyDeG)
8
is it me or do Courtney Love and Garofalo get their hair done at the same car wash?
Posted by: jcrue at April 02, 2004 04:32 PM (G9kk0)
9
Who is sexier - Franken or Garofalo? Never a better example of faces made for radio. Buon Compleanno!
Posted by: Rich at April 02, 2004 05:44 PM (PRH1C)
10
My hand hurts like Hell™ from spanking you! All that rollerblading sure paid off!
Posted by: Radical Redneck at April 02, 2004 07:01 PM (lRL15)
11
Oh! Happy Belated Birthday!
And your sarcastic AF joke...you're silly.
Posted by: serenity at April 03, 2004 02:53 PM (3g7Ch)
12
Liberal talk show radio has not existed for a reason; no one is listening.
All of us who do listen to the radio are in our cars going to or coming from work, or in the middle of our work days traveling.
The non-working, sponging part of our society is home watching their plasma color HDTV's. The only time they move their Cadillacs from in front of their houses is to go pick up the checks we provide them each week/month at what we used to call "Club 55".
I predict a long life for Franken and Garafolo (they deserve to marry each other); about as long as the recent Donahue Show lasted on MSNBC.
Posted by: shelly s. at April 04, 2004 06:18 AM (AaBEz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
98kb generated in CPU 0.118, elapsed 0.1507 seconds.
74 queries taking 0.1028 seconds, 291 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.