February 21, 2005
BL Line Of The Night
We all hate our clients. It's good to hate. It allows us to overcharge and still sleep at night.
--Denny Crane
Posted by: annika at
06:08 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What a pregnant line. That's good dialogue.
Inevitably, we become what we are. If you practice love in your life, you become loving. If you give way to hate, ultimately there is no joy. That's why there are so many joyless lawyers. Way too much cognitive dissonance in that line of work.
The only happy lawyers who I ever met weren't practicing law.
Posted by: Casca at February 21, 2005 10:36 AM (cdv3B)
2
Casca wrote:
The only happy lawyers who I ever met weren't practicing law.
LOL
then that would make them.......not lawyers!!!!!
a rabbit and a snake, both blind from birth, and not knowing what they were, bumped into each other every day in a field as they crossed. on one occasion, they stopped and explained their predicament to each other. using this as an opportunity to discover each others identity as well as their own, the snake wrapped itself around the rabbit. they then proceeded to describe each other thusly. the snake said you are furry, soft, big ears, cold nose, large hind legs.....you must be a rabbit. the rabbit was overjoyed at hearing this. the rabbit said, you are slimy, scaly, you have a forked tongue, but lack a backbone.....you must be a lawyer.
Posted by: louielouie at February 22, 2005 08:53 AM (i7mWl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 20, 2005
OMG Tony Pierce Is So Awesome!
Read
Part One of my interview. It's even illustrated!
Then go buy How To Blog.
Posted by: annika at
06:59 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jennifer at February 20, 2005 07:44 PM (IKn6K)
2
I thought that the Elton John illustration was a nice touch, although I still think that Boy George would make a better UN Secretary General.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 20, 2005 08:19 PM (muth+)
3
I can't believe Tony Pierce read my (well, my and OS's) blog. I normally assume the only people reading my blog are mutants like me. (This is how I rationalize the relative dearth of traffic. There aren't many mutants like me.)
Posted by: Matt at February 20, 2005 11:04 PM (TLYaI)
Posted by: ginger at February 21, 2005 04:12 AM (Fl6Ze)
5
Starts slow, finishes better.
Heh, I've only been reading blogs for the past five years. Who's Tony Pierce?
Matt, one thing I have noticed is that if you want traffic, you've got to have good content and make it a life goal, or have female tender parts and talk kinda slutty.
Posted by: Casca at February 21, 2005 09:59 AM (cdv3B)
6
Congratulations!!
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at February 21, 2005 11:44 AM (RpVKX)
7
Mmm..female tender parts..
Posted by: JD at February 22, 2005 03:02 PM (J+Gcr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WTF?
Am i the only one who was uncomfortable seeing a dancing midget onstage during the halftime show of the NBA All Star Game?
Wasn't that a bit insensitive, given that basketball is a sport that celebrates height more than any other human endeavor?
i mean, that was worse even than LeAnn Rimes' trashy outfit. What was up with that, anyway?
Update: Even though hardly anybody watched the game, and fewer still probably stuck around for the halftime show, i wasn't the only blogger who noticed the dancing midget.
Nasal Passages had this to say:
Ummmmmmmmmm, so at the half time of the NBA All-Star Game they have some "entertainment." LeeAnn Rimes was cute and her song, while very boring, wasn't bad. But right now there's this band on called "Big and Rich" and, well, they suck! What REALLY sucks about them is they have a little person on stage with them wearing a fuzzy orange hat and dancing with his two canes. Does a midget make for an entertaining half time show?? I think not. It's just all really disturbing....REALLY disturbing!!
Absolutely. Disturbing is exactly the word for it.
But Marti was distinctly pro-midget. Or at least pro-Big & Rich:
They had a midget with a cane in each hand dancing backup.
I got you now.
A midget,
cane in each hand,
dancing backup.
That's just too funny to pass up. . . . Apparently, this duo invites many colorful characters into their fantasyland, including Limo Larry, a formerly homeless drug addict who ferries off-duty strippers and inebriated musicians around Nashville every night. And Tim the Electrician, a guy with a big mustache and a beer-swigging red macaw named Santana who clings to his owner's shoulder while Tim practices the sport he's invented, championship chair riding. I'm curious to see the rulebook for this one.
My god, you can't make up stuff this funny.
Well, i guess i need to be there.
Michael Lorenzo didn't like the music either:
I am appalled.
I just saw 3 country songs too many, a 6'5" rapping self-proclaimed black cowboy, a back up rapper dressed in a mad hatter costume, several small young white boys trying to pop and lock and a midget trying to imitate an animatronic bear.
i like a lot of country music myself. But that halftime show last night was wrong on too many levels.
Posted by: annika at
06:50 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 391 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I missed the NBA All Star Game due to personal commitments, but LeAnn Rimes has THE VOICE.
So did Shaq beat up Kobe?
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 20, 2005 08:21 PM (muth+)
2
People actually watch the NBA all star game?
Posted by: Mark at February 21, 2005 05:48 AM (oQofX)
3
With all of that to recommend it, I'm glad I missed it. Plus, basketball sucks.
Posted by: JD at February 21, 2005 10:51 AM (J+Gcr)
4
The whole midget genre really topped out with Spinal Tap. Nigel, as was typical, screwed up the measurements for the fake stonehendge display, and it ended up getting "trod upon" by the midgets. Really, after that tragic scene, anything else just isn't going to...er, measure up.
Posted by: Pursuit at February 21, 2005 01:39 PM (VqIuy)
5
What would a halftime show be without someone complaining about it?
Just get rid of them all I say.
Posted by: Jason at February 22, 2005 11:16 AM (Y2Bw/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hateful Lawyer
Sacramento blogger
Digger has the inside scoop on that idiot lawyer named
Pearcy who keeps hanging up the soldier's effigy, then scurrying back to Berkeley.
Look at the sign he displays on the back of his Boxster. What a piece of work.
Update: You simply must see what Rodger did to the Pearcy's Boxter. What a freakin' riot!
Posted by: annika at
06:39 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Wow. I thought Portland was a liberal place, but it doesn't hold a candle to that. I may not like Bush much but that's a disgrace to the uniform and everything it stands for. At least for me since I wore a uniform for 8 years ( USMC ) I think if he was in my neighborhood I'd have to go have a little chat with him.
Posted by: Andy at February 20, 2005 07:01 PM (l04c2)
2
People like this are quick to claim they mean no disrespect to the soldiers themselves, a bald-faced lie. Cowards themselves, they despise the military and make this claim solely to avoid the Jane Fonda stigma.
Posted by: JD at February 20, 2005 07:45 PM (J+Gcr)
3
I suppose a Boxter is way more fuel efficient and environmentally conscious than an SUV?!? Liberals are great, aren't they?
Posted by: Roach at February 20, 2005 08:40 PM (DHoAQ)
4
"Makin' mock of uniforms,
what guards you while you sleep,
is cheaper than those uniforms,
and they're starvation cheap."
As for hating SUV's? If you don't, you've never been cut off by a woman with a cell phone in one ear, and tires that reach your eye level.
I feel sorry for these two. They're have set a course in life, where every waiter will be spitting in their soup.
Posted by: Casca at February 21, 2005 09:31 AM (cdv3B)
5
"Spitting"?
Be careful Casca, you are losing your touch.
Posted by: shelly at February 21, 2005 04:24 PM (+7VNs)
6
I suppose you're right. Spitting in one's soup is a bit mild, and can even pass untasted, but when they piss in your coffee...
Posted by: Casca at February 21, 2005 10:42 PM (cdv3B)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Robot Week On annika's journal
Attention.
i have unilaterally decided to designate this week as Robot Week here on annika's journal.
i'm not sure what all that will entail, besides putting up the new poll on my sidebar, which i encourage you to vote in.
Oh, and experimenting with a new robot-friendly font.
Maybe i'll do a post about Al Gore...
...in Fortran.
Any suggestions?
Robot week! Come celebrate it with me.
Posted by: annika at
01:39 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 77 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Not difficult to predict how the voting is going to turn out..
Posted by: JD at February 20, 2005 03:51 PM (J+Gcr)
2
DAMN! So you're drinking through a rainy day too? Do vibrators and enhanced love dolls count?
Posted by: Casca at February 20, 2005 04:19 PM (cdv3B)
3
10 PRINT "I DO NOT KNOW FORTRAN"
20 PRINT "BUT I LEARNED BASIC"
30 PRINT "MANY MANY YEARS AGO"
40 PRINT "WHEN LINE NUMBERS WERE REQUIRED"
50 GOTO 10
60 END
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 20, 2005 08:22 PM (muth+)
4
I think the poll results should tell you everything you need to know about your readers--and I'm one of the majority in this case.
Posted by: ken at February 21, 2005 09:11 AM (9WeJO)
5
GO GO GADGET DICK!!!11one1
Posted by: Spanky at February 21, 2005 01:04 PM (dP84C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
More Completely Useless Sunday Afternoon Blogging
Laurie Dhue appears to be
retaining water.
Developing...
Posted by: annika at
11:59 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: JD at February 20, 2005 12:27 PM (J+Gcr)
2
She's still my #1 reason to watch Fox News, though.
Posted by: Dave J at February 20, 2005 01:23 PM (CYpG7)
3
Better than spewing it out, I guess.
How many of the female Fox anchors are blonde? How does that compare to the general population (or even the general TV population)?
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 20, 2005 08:24 PM (muth+)
4
Maybe I should watch more FN..
Posted by: JD at February 21, 2005 06:29 AM (J+Gcr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Dear George...
"It's me versus the world," he told Mr. Wead. "The good news is, the world is on my side. Or more than half of it."
Huh?
You know i love you George, but are you sure Doug was the only wead in the room when you said that?
Posted by: annika at
11:29 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Interestingly, the part they didn't report was what he said immediately after that. It was: ehh, ehh dude, lets get a pizza.
Posted by: Pursuit at February 21, 2005 06:31 PM (VqIuy)
2
Wead is a worm. A tape worm.
The only people lower than Wead are the people that would buy his "book".
I get a warm and fuzzy feeling that he is (per Wead) still a friend of The President. I wonder if the President thinks that is so.
Every time I think that Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and some of the other scumbags are as low as one can get, along comes a lowlife like Wead to remind me I might be wrong.
Is no one else offended by this betrayal?
Posted by: shelly at February 21, 2005 06:59 PM (+7VNs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
News Flash!
On ABC's
This Week With George Stepopotamus, terrorism "expert" Dicke Clarke made the following pronouncement
Terrorists can't make a nuclear weapon.
Thanks Dicke. i feel so much better now. i was wrong to worry. i see now why they paid you the big buckes.
i'll ignore the way you stammered when George Will pointed out that terrorists could simply buy a nuclear weapon.
Posted by: annika at
08:46 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Getting and detonating a nuke is problematic. These are delicate devices, since so much has to work just right in order to get a detonation. A device that hasn't been maintained in five years, probably isn't going to work right.
The Rooskees buried suitcase bombs all over the West during the cold war, then simply forgot where they put them. It's a safe bet, that none of these devices could work today.
So, if they went out to "buy" a device, they'd have to buy a "working" device. AND, if they were buying from Roooskeees, lol, well, more likely that the Rooskeeees get the money, and the camel-fuckers get something that LOOKS like a bomb.
It is worth remembering, that your average Roooskeee HATES Moslims with centuries of good reason. The Ost Theater and the massacre of schoolchildren being among the least of these.
The real threat is a dirty bomb, and the reality of what can be done with one of those pales compared to the real thing. The real fallout of such an act would be to galvanize the American public around a more Shermanesque approach to dealing with our rug-kneeling brothers as compared to the current planting of the tree of liberty approach.
Posted by: Casca at February 20, 2005 09:30 AM (cdv3B)
2
So, Casca, I guess you are for a limited dirty bomb here somewhere, as long as it's not near someone you hold dear.
It might help some of the readers who are not up on this stuff to know that the word "Chechins" is the MSM's nice word for "Moslems". Somehow, the MSM has difficulty identifying them as such.
Oh, and congratulations for getting through an entire post with only using one potty mouth. It is a lot easier to read. I, myself, prefer to call them "Sheetheads" and watch my pronunciation.
Posted by: shelly at February 20, 2005 10:15 AM (6krEN)
3
That whole business of putting words in one's mouth, and attempted rhetorical trickeration is what puts people off of lawyers in the first place. I never advocated any sort of thing. I'm merely positing the logical progression of events, ya fucker, lmao.
Posted by: Casca at February 20, 2005 04:40 PM (cdv3B)
4
off topic post------
Casca wrote:
"The Rooskees buried suitcase bombs all over the West during the cold war,"
LOL
everytime i hear about the russian suitcase bombs, it reminds me of a story. it makes perfect sense to anyone familiar with russian society.
at the height of the cold war, a spy was sent into russia in an attempt to verify whether or not it was true about a "russian suitcase nuke".
after an extended absence, the spy returned and confirmed that russia in fact had a nuke that would fit in a suitcase.
it would be deployed as soon as the bugs in the suitcase were worked out.
Posted by: louielouie at February 21, 2005 12:56 PM (i7mWl)
5
Spasibo, Louielouie.
Ochen' harasho.
Posted by: Dave J at February 21, 2005 02:48 PM (CYpG7)
6
That's pretty damn close to the truth. But don't sell them short. They have great scientists. It's their culture that is corrupt.
Posted by: Casca at February 21, 2005 04:51 PM (cdv3B)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 19, 2005
American Skankwoman Update
i refer you to
these excellent remarks, from
Citygurl.
Posted by: annika at
12:27 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
That Citaygurl smells like psychotwat.
Posted by: Casca at February 19, 2005 03:05 PM (cdv3B)
2
If Brittany had any talent, I would worry about her. But she doesn't so its time for the world to forget her.
Posted by: Jake at February 19, 2005 06:02 PM (r/5D/)
3
Hasn't anyone told Britney that alcohol is sugar? Well, it's nicely tanned blubber..
Posted by: JD at February 20, 2005 08:52 AM (J+Gcr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Oh... My... God...
i've just fallen in love. Alas, they're
too freakin' expensive.
Posted by: annika at
09:04 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 16 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'll ask you the same question I regularly ask my three sisters:
"What IS it with you chicks? I mean, jeez, what's the deal? They're freakin'
shoes, not hubcaps, fer cryin' out loud."
And this is the point where I usually run away.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 19, 2005 10:04 AM (Y5Ww1)
2
So, what's it like to be nucking futz? You can buy a pretty good meal for that kind of dough.
Posted by: Casca at February 19, 2005 10:53 AM (cdv3B)
3
Gentlemen! If they can put up with us building a pumpkin catapult at 2AM (with or without the aid of alcohol), we can put up with them buying 80 or 90 pairs of shoes.
Posted by: Victor at February 19, 2005 11:33 AM (etHvD)
4
my God, but those shoes belong in a museum, they're so pretty!
Posted by: annika at February 19, 2005 11:57 AM (7nCqE)
5
Victor,
You built a pumpkin catapult? Totally cool.
Posted by: Pursuit at February 19, 2005 12:43 PM (VqIuy)
6
Surgical tubing: it's not just for the operating room.
It's also for catapulting pumpkins.
In other pumpkin news, this limerick from NOR's
John Derbyshire should please one and all:
A certain young hillbilly bumpkin
Was caught having sex with a pumpkin.
When arrested he swore:
"What's all this fuss for?
Where I'm from, it's okay to hump kin!"
Thank you! Good night!
Posted by: ccwbass at February 19, 2005 10:20 PM (Y5Ww1)
7
Yes, but ONLY 80 or 90..
Posted by: JD at February 20, 2005 08:53 AM (J+Gcr)
8
Victor,
I must respectfully dissent. The fact that I construct
one pumpkin catapult -- a purely utilitarian device, one of which belongs in every household -- does not necessarily say anything about my better half's need for
more than one pair of shoes!
Of course if my better half questions me regarding that statement, I will point out that anyone could have used my name and e-mail in composing this comment.
Further, I have no interest in discussing why I need to own about seven different varients of the M1911 pistol in .45 ACP caliber. It should suffice to say that they're all different. In
really important ways. No, I mean it. Seriously!
All kidding aside, though: Holy shit! $400 for
shoes?
Those shoes?! Christ, my Danner boots only cost half that!
Posted by: Matt at February 20, 2005 11:36 PM (TLYaI)
9
May as well buy them, Annika, that whole re-incarnation thing isn't what it's rumored to be..
Posted by: JD at February 21, 2005 06:33 AM (J+Gcr)
10
Matt, I can think of several reasons why you should own "seven different varients of the M1911 pistol in .45 ACP caliber." Hell's bell's, didja forget to put one in each of the bathrooms?
annika, you need a "momma needs a new pair of shoes" donation button somewhere.
Posted by: Victor and his seventeen pet rats at February 21, 2005 07:25 AM (L3qPK)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 17, 2005
Useless Candy Blogging
Why hasn't Reese's made a peanut butter cup in dark chocolate?
Posted by: annika at
04:05 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: ken at February 17, 2005 04:29 PM (xD5ND)
Posted by: Spanky at February 17, 2005 04:44 PM (ICWUG)
3
DAMN! Shoulda gone to biz school!!
Posted by: Casca at February 17, 2005 04:47 PM (cdv3B)
4
Or one with white chocolate? Mmmmm...white chocolate
Posted by: Robbie at February 17, 2005 06:45 PM (htx4h)
5
My guess would be because either 1) the expense doesn't justify the small niche market it'd marginally expand into or 2) dark chocolate does something to peanut butter. But I concur in the wish that they did.
And Robbie, sorry, but white "chocolate" is gross, and not really chocolate, either.
Posted by: Dave J at February 17, 2005 07:55 PM (CYpG7)
Posted by: Matt at February 18, 2005 06:18 AM (TLYaI)
7
Ooops. Ignore that superfluous and grammatically incorrect "make."
Posted by: Matt at February 18, 2005 06:19 AM (TLYaI)
8
Oh, and Annie: If you scroll down to the bottom of that Reese's link I posted, you'll discover that, "Recently, the company introduced popular limited edition items including White Chocolate (now a permanent item),
Dark Chocolate, INSIDE OUT and BIG CUP peanut butter cups." See
here.
No word on whether they're still in production.
Posted by: Matt at February 18, 2005 06:23 AM (TLYaI)
9
Matt, the singular versus plural for a company with a plural or posessive name isn't necessarily grammatically incorrect: just British rather than American forms for collective entities (e.g., "the Administration is" versus "the Government are").
Posted by: Dave J at February 18, 2005 07:13 AM (CYpG7)
10
Although using BOTH singular and plural forms at the same time is, of course, as you noted, superfluous.
Moreover, does my saying that white chocolate is disgusting imply that I thought there weren't white chocolate Reese's cups? I wouldn't think so.
Posted by: Dave J at February 18, 2005 07:16 AM (CYpG7)
11
"the singular versus plural for a company with a plural or posessive name isn't necessarily grammatically incorrect"
Thanks for the heads-up; I wouldn't have picked up on the Brit angle. However, since I tend toward linguistic descriptivism, and speak American English, I still prefer the plural. (Perhaps we Americans take the concept of corporate personality a bit more seriously than the Brits.)
"does my saying that white chocolate is disgusting imply that I thought there weren't white chocolate Reese's cups?"
No. I inferred it from the fact that you didn't mention that there
are white chocolate Reese's cups, which seemed a natural thing to mention at that juncture, if you knew.
Did you know?
Posted by: Matt at February 18, 2005 12:06 PM (TLYaI)
12
Dammit. I can't get through a single comment or post today without flubbing at least one thing.
I'm going to take a nap.
Posted by: Matt at February 18, 2005 12:08 PM (TLYaI)
13
I think you guys need to get a life.
Posted by: shelly at February 18, 2005 09:10 PM (+7VNs)
Posted by: Matt at February 18, 2005 09:28 PM (TLYaI)
15
Folks,
I'm in the business. Trust me, Reese's (Hershey) does make Reese's Dark Chocolate PB Cup.
You'll probably find the product in your favorite convenience store.
I can tell you this--they are available here in the Midwest.
To you marketing aficionados, dark chocolate is the only segment of the the chocolate biz that's experiencing double digit growth.
Can you say brand extension?
Hence, the dark chocolate product.
Posted by: joe at February 19, 2005 06:42 AM (1w3cL)
16
that would be yummy! i wonder why, too?? hmmm... i think i'm gonna ask? heee... tk =^.^=
Posted by: maizzy at February 19, 2005 07:42 AM (qB1h2)
17
They made it two years ago when they introduced white chocolate. Open your eyes. They were limited edition and by far the best kind out there. Typically they chose to continue the lesser of the two...white chocolate. Yeah, apparently people like Maroon 5, too.
Posted by: jimmy at August 07, 2005 08:45 AM (l9Oo7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Bush Picks His Intelligence Czar
Intelligence czar?
The first order of business, i would imagine, will be teaching the president how to pronounce "nuclear."
Posted by: annika at
01:50 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
February 16, 2005
How Committed A Fan Are You?
No no, i'm not expecting
everyone anyone to get an annie's journal tattoo...
...although i won't discourage the idea.
Now that i think of it, that would be a great way to advertise - and i need only 93 more links to pass fatbody Oliver Willis on the Ecosystem!
Posted by: annika at
10:20 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 61 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Who the fuck could read that porcine shitstain Ollie?
Posted by: Casca at February 16, 2005 11:10 PM (cdv3B)
2
Is that real or photoshopped?
Posted by: Victor and his seventeen pet rats at February 17, 2005 05:48 AM (L3qPK)
3
check the rubrics, ratboy!
Posted by: annika at February 17, 2005 08:58 AM (zAOEU)
Posted by: Victor and his seventeen pet rats at February 17, 2005 09:14 AM (L3qPK)
5
SNL had a "commercial" for laser tat removal on recently. It was advertising for women to get their back tats removed. In a demo, it showed a nice sexy back with the tatoo "Sexy Lady". They then demonstrated what happens as the skins ages and droops. The Sexy Lady morphed into "Just Sad". It was pretty good yuks.
Posted by: Pursuit at February 17, 2005 12:01 PM (VqIuy)
6
Damn. I just posted something about tats and now I find you've beaten me to the punch.
Posted by: Paul at February 17, 2005 01:23 PM (vbP6L)
7
The internet is the only place Oliver has done anything on note.
Posted by: jcrue at February 17, 2005 03:11 PM (Qs+xB)
8
So Annie, who's butt is that?
Posted by: shelly at February 17, 2005 03:26 PM (ywZa8)
9
Careful Shelly, I'm the rude fucker here.
Posted by: Casca at February 17, 2005 03:41 PM (cdv3B)
10
Where's the rubrics cube? I don't see it.
Posted by: Spanky at February 17, 2005 04:43 PM (ICWUG)
11
Shelly, not mine, happily.
Posted by: annika at February 17, 2005 06:56 PM (LGiAC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday Is Poetry Day
In keeping with this week's grumpy Valentine's Day theme, i've selected the perfect sonnet from my favorite poet, Edna St. Vincent Millay.
If I should learn, in some quite casual way,
That you were gone, not to return again—
Read from the back-page of a paper, say,
Held by a neighbor in a subway train,
How at the corner of this avenue
And such a street (so are the papers filled)
A hurrying man—who happened to be you—
At noon to-day had happened to be killed,
I should not cry aloud—I could not cry
Aloud, or wring my hands in such a place—
I should but watch the station lights rush by
With a more careful interest on my face,
Or raise my eyes and read with greater care
Where to store furs and how to treat the hair.
Ouch. Edna could be a snarky bitch when she wanted to.
Which was often.
Posted by: annika at
06:56 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 161 words, total size 1 kb.
1
An oh so very eloquent, "Fuck Off".
Posted by: Casca at February 16, 2005 08:39 PM (cdv3B)
2
Nathan Jones You've been gone too long. Bananrama?
Posted by: taylor collins at February 18, 2005 04:58 PM (Ya2t1)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 15, 2005
Study Habits
A very nice commenter sent me an e-mail expressing concern about whether i am studying hard enough, with all the blogging i do. i actually try to follow a pretty strict study schedule, and do most of my posts after i'm done for the night, or in the down time between classes.
Actually, blogging has helped me at school. My ability to write quickly, in a form that is closer to final draft quality, is directly related to the daily writing that i have been doing for almost two years as a blogger. My highest grade last semester was my writing class, i think thanks to blogging.
But, as further proof that i have been studying hard, i've decided to let you be the judge. Open the extended entry and you will find a photograph of my study space, complete with annotations.
more...
Posted by: annika at
11:11 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 212 words, total size 1 kb.
1
my desk is probably twice as cluttered but 0% of its items could be labeled as evidence that I've been studying.
Posted by: Chris at February 16, 2005 05:27 AM (23bPv)
2
someone loves her some rolling rock!
Posted by: lorie at February 16, 2005 06:38 AM (PPPwU)
3
Someone seriously needs a bigger, flat-panel monitor. What is that thing? 13"?
And Toad the Wet Sprocket? They haven't released an album with new music since
Coil flopped in 1997. Is that the same year you purchased that monitor?
Posted by: Robbie at February 16, 2005 08:49 AM (AAqv2)
4
hmmm... where's the wine rack?
Posted by: d-rod at February 16, 2005 08:55 AM (T3c0Z)
5
Um, I love Toad too.
Terrific, Annie. And thank you for your very kind gift. It has pride of place on my desk.
Posted by: Hugo at February 16, 2005 09:56 AM (Qst0d)
6
Actually, I argue that the Rolling Rock bottles, chips, etc. are evidence of good study habits. You don't have to leave your desk to take a break. Just multi-task...
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 16, 2005 12:26 PM (c6rOB)
7
What? No bong? Wow, school certainly has changed!
Posted by: Pursuit at February 16, 2005 01:59 PM (VqIuy)
8
"My ability to write quickly, in a form that is closer to final draft quality, is directly related to the daily writing that i have been doing for almost two years as a blogger".
Absolutely right. The more you write the better writer you become. Especially when you expose your writing to a thousands of critics every day.
Posted by: Jake at February 16, 2005 03:21 PM (r/5D/)
9
Lol, I still take forever writing a paper, but blogging has helped me get used to thinking critically and putting my thoughts down. Good ole-fashioned ranting pays off :-)
Posted by: Ron (Naughtypundit) at February 16, 2005 05:30 PM (9Z7dn)
10
Ah yes, Latrobe, PA. I used to like that stuff. Actually, Genesee Cream Ale was the gargle of choice.
Posted by: Casca at February 16, 2005 08:49 PM (cdv3B)
11
It looks like a NEC 17-flatscreen. annika, trust me on this one: you don't need an LCD flatscreen. You might
want, but they're waaaay overhyped. They're a great example of form over function. Look good, act crappy.
Posted by: Victor and his seventeen pet rats at February 17, 2005 11:22 AM (L3qPK)
12
i love my NEC. But i wish it didn't hog so much desk space tho.
Posted by: annika at February 17, 2005 06:58 PM (LGiAC)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
A Continuum Of Leftist Hatred
Maybe i'm wrong, but isn't there the potential for a dangerous progression of hatred in the recent post-election gnashing of teeth by the American left.
In other words, doesn't this. . .
'I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for,' former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean told Democrats gathered at a Manhattan hotel.
. . .
encourage this . . .
Bush supporters need not apply (we hate that asshole). Also, you should be a student as well. House has 4 easy-going, liberal, intelligent male students and one friendly, intelligent dog.
. . .
which leads to this . . .
This sweet little children's teddy bear [for sale at CafePress.com] bears the phrase 'Save America, Kill Republicans'. The caption for the item . . . reads:Making fun of Repubicans won't get them on our side, but threatening to kill them might be more effective.
. . . and
possibly stuff like this . . .
The FBI and Auburn police are investigating the discovery of an incendiary device that was left at the entrance of the Placer County Courthouse over the weekend.
The discovery raised questions about whether the device was connected to a series of arsons and attempted arsons in Northern California by someone claiming to be with the Earth Liberation Front, a radical environmental group.
. . .
The Auburn Police Department said Sunday's incident was troubling because it diverged from the pattern established in the other attacks. Instead of targeting a site under construction, whoever planted the most recent device did so at a historic landmark.
The beautiful Placer County courthouse in Auburn
is a working courthouse, not just a landmark.*
People need to cool it, seriously.
_______________
* Placer County, by the way, is one of California's reddest counties, voting for Bush 63% to 37%.
Posted by: annika at
11:56 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 299 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Fuck You! Islam in general is a peaceful religion, but I myself would become jihadi if my country would be occupied by fat ass American rednecks. All you can do is only eat, some day your whole fucking country will sink because all of you are so fucking fat. It’s disgusting! But to get back to the subject. Who’s aggresive here? Who bombed who, who occupied who and who wants to exploit who? I don’t see Arab soldiers patrolling the streets of LA or New York. I don’t see any Egyptian army barracks in the US. You fuckers have bases all over the world. God bless America right, the racist, imperialistic hegemonic colonizer under it’s Fuhrer George W.Bush.
History has proven Christianity to be evil. It’s christianity which is the most aggressive religion. It were Christians who wiped out the original population of the America’s (and forced the rest to convert, something unfamiliar to benevolent islam). It was all Christians who antisemitic (muslims were not)and a Christian nation (Germany) killed 6 million of them. I can go on and on if I want. Islam is peaceful, but everybody has a right to defend himself if being attacked by genocidal racist maniacs, even muslims!
Fuck You!
Posted by: tim at February 15, 2005 01:39 PM (ZCft5)
2
Alright, it's not April Fools day, but nice try.
Posted by: annika at February 15, 2005 04:03 PM (zAOEU)
3
How come we never hear from the sophisticated Europeans?
Posted by: d-rod at February 15, 2005 04:21 PM (CSRmO)
4
Dude, perhaps you have not heard. We'll put a boot in your ass. It's the American way. Chances are we'll enjoy it too.
Posted by: Jim Mattis at February 15, 2005 05:58 PM (cdv3B)
5
haha, don't take the bait boys. that's gotta be a hoax commenter.
Posted by: annika at February 15, 2005 06:17 PM (E8dbz)
6
How did blonds EVER get a reputation as being dumb?
Posted by: Casca at February 15, 2005 06:27 PM (cdv3B)
7
I know, I know. You'll always be blond to me.
Posted by: Casca at February 15, 2005 06:28 PM (cdv3B)
8
Hey Annie, speaking of drama queens did you know Andy Sully, Wonkette and Glenn Reynolds are on Charlie Rose tonight?
Posted by: Radical Redneck at February 15, 2005 07:51 PM (7XTy8)
9
If they want to fight, i will be more than willing to. Of course since all the red states have all the best guns because the blue states are outlawing them, they will be at a disadvantage.
The red states also have a higher amount of schools to train civilians with handguns than the blue states do.
Posted by: cube at February 16, 2005 08:16 AM (nyNr0)
10
Getting back to the original point, it's a stretch to argue that Howard Dean's ravings are the direct cause of murders of Americans. (In the same way, I don't believe that listening to Ozzy will make a well-adjusted person suddenly off himself.) I don't think anyone can equate Howard Dean with the Earth Liberation grunts.
What can't be denied, however, is that the so-called party of loving inclusiveness can suddenly get downright hateful about who to include. In fact, last night I
blogged about the way in which a few leftist blogs are describing "Jeff Gannon" as a "homosexual" and "sodomite." Interesting choice of terms, isn't it?
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 16, 2005 12:33 PM (c6rOB)
11
I'm more annoyed with the hypocricy (and with me being too lazy to see if I spelled that right, lol). I know many on the Left have loudly complained about rightwing talk fueling violence. Yet if ya look at the last election, seems like the vast majority of the political violence (such as the attacks on GOP offices) came from the Left. Don't hear a peep about that. How a culture of hate from liberal figures fueled violence.
Posted by: Ron (Naughtypundit) at February 16, 2005 05:37 PM (9Z7dn)
12
If the libs want to get to killin', they'll see who's better equipped and more skillful.
Posted by: JD at February 20, 2005 08:38 AM (J+Gcr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
American Idiot: Gore Vidal
At A Western Heart,*
C.B. posts
a great fisking of Gore Vidal's apperance on the Australian Broadcasting Company's
Lateline with Tony Jones.
Vidal is truly an American Idiot. One of those irrational leftists who likes to go abroad and speak out of his ass. i loved this statement, wherein he accuses the Bush administration of lying, and as support for his accusation, he strings together a bunch of real whoppers.
That is what the people around Bush have discovered: you repeat the lie, and if people look slightly doubtful, you repeat it again more loudly, and you go on and on. Bush went on for about three years getting ready for the Iraq war, saying that Osama bin Laden, responsible for the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington, was working hand in glove with Saddam Hussein, who was equally guilty; therefore, we were going to remove Saddam Hussein, because he was so vicious.
Bush. Said. No. Such. Thing. Ever.
The Australian audience for Lateline can't have been expected to know that Bush never made such a statement, let alone repeated it "again more loudly . . . on and on." But i followed the election closely, and Vidal's statement is a boldfaced lie. The closest anyone ever got to pinning the accusation that the Bush administration made an explicit connection between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein is one sentence in one document. i blogged about this last June.
i think it's despicable that Vidal goes to another country, and uses that line about repeating the big lie (which is a veiled Nazi reference), and then lies himself, thinking he can get away with it.
Kudos to the Australian host, whom i am unfamiliar with, but he did challenge Vidal's assertion that America is a despotic country.
TONY JONES: Despotism, though, and tyranny implies a suppression of dissent. I mean, there's no bar to open dissent in the United States; just simply whether you can get on to the corporate media.
. . .
Gore Vidal, I think you are living proof, however, that dissent is still living in the United States.
No shit.
_______________
* A Western Heart is new international group blog, where i've been recently added as a contributor. There's some good stuff there; i'd love it if you'd go check it out.
Posted by: annika at
10:00 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 389 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Well, he is a bit of a windbag -- but his novels delighted me in my youth and still do today.
Posted by: Hugo at February 15, 2005 11:47 AM (Qst0d)
2
His lies about this country are rooted in his deep belief that Americans deserved a surprise assault on civilians by extremist murderers.
Posted by: d-rod at February 15, 2005 12:10 PM (CSRmO)
3
Listen my children,
and you shall hear,
of a late night fight,
between William F. Buckley,
and this here queer.
Before Johnny begat Jay, Jack begat Johnny, and Jack was a liberal prick of the first water. It goes without saying, that GV was a fellow traveler, and over an extended period he used The Tonight Show as a platform to attack our Godfather. Go read the whole story in WFB's first editorial collection, "Rumbles Left and Right". Let me know if you need an E version.
One of my fav episodes of the Simpsons is where they're headed off for a vacation at the beach, and Bart and Lisa are allowed to bring a friend. Bart brings Milhous of course, and Lisa laments as she packs her bag with books that her only friends are found in these books and the people who wrote them, "Like Gore Vidal, and even he's kissed more boys than I have". No shit, that's the verbatum line.
Posted by: Casca at February 15, 2005 06:14 PM (cdv3B)
4
Ya know, after I saw him in 'With Honors' I took it as granted that he's just an old queen.
Posted by: JD at February 21, 2005 06:41 AM (J+Gcr)
5
Dear Annika
The ABC is Ustralia is The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (not company).
I'm not sure there is "truth" beyond what a man says and what he does ('troth" "trove"). But I am sure there are lies. I don't think ones sexual prefernces have much to do with the capacity for either truth or lies.
Posted by: Keith Russell at February 26, 2005 08:35 PM (7pG6w)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
What Kind Of Shoe?
Ballet shoes- beautiful, graceful, and creative,
you enjoy dancing writing and music. You are
often very poetic and sometimes dramatic. Even
if dancing isn't your thing, you are still very
creative. You keep to yourself aside from a few
close friends that you can relate to. You find
your own ways to express yourself and don't
have a need to br surrounded by tons of people.
A small group of friends is fine.
What Kind of Shoe Are You?(new and updated results!!) brought to you by Quizilla
Posted by: annika at
07:46 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I got leather boots. You knew that had to happen.
Posted by: candy girl at February 15, 2005 11:40 AM (5R9NQ)
2
Strangely enough, having never been on a pair, the quiz says I'm a pair of Rollerblades.
Posted by: JD at February 21, 2005 06:43 AM (J+Gcr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 14, 2005
i'm A Playful Primate!
Now i
know there's a flaw in
The Ecosystem. But i quickly captured
a screenprint of the phenomenon, before NZ Bear fixes whatever bug caused annika's journal to enter the top 100!
Posted by: annika at
10:48 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 40 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Nah, not a glitch: you deserve it. Congrats!
Posted by: Dave J at February 15, 2005 06:12 AM (CYpG7)
2
I keep tellin' ya! This modesty thing is starting to wear thin, girl. Face it: You're a hit. At least we little people can take pride in being able to say "I knew her back when. . ."
And by the way, you can't duck that Repub Babe of the Week thing much longer now that you're a big success and, effectively, out in the open.
Posted by: Matt at February 15, 2005 08:19 AM (SIlfx)
3
... same thing happened to me a few weeks ago... crazy stuff... luckily, I have been smacked back into my usual place in the 500-600 range.. enjoy it girl!.. your blog belongs up there!
Posted by: Eric at February 15, 2005 08:20 AM (YlwMq)
4
Congrats. Watch out for Oliver Willis, though. He's dropping like a stone. A really, really heavy stone. Just step out of the way and no one gets hurt.
Posted by: physics geek at February 16, 2005 10:33 AM (Xvrs7)
5
not a glitch in your case
Posted by: El Cid at February 20, 2005 12:58 AM (C2P/4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Lame Or Genius Idea?
Over at
Paul's a commenter named
EEKer posted the following comment, and i can't decide whether it's a lame idea or a genius idea.
Years ago I was able to convince my wife that it would be really romantic to switch off for Valentines every year. One year she is the Valentine and the next I am. This was a good move. She ate it up and loves the idea. Now I'm off the hook at least every other year. This year I'm coasting!
i guess it depends on how long the relationship has been around. It would probably be a bad idea to suggest trading off years when you're still dating. But after a few years of marriage, i could see the idea having its advantages.
Posted by: annika at
04:22 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 133 words, total size 1 kb.
1
lame idea. he may be "off the hook" this year but what does that mean? Shes no ones valentine that year? It sounds a tad self centered on a day which should be a celebration of love not whos "off the hook" this time. If I loved someone enough to marry them they would be my valentine every year. Call me corny, I dont care.
Posted by: daniel at February 14, 2005 08:07 PM (EaziX)
2
ok, daniel.
you're corny i dont care.
Posted by: louielouie at February 14, 2005 09:11 PM (i7mWl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
90kb generated in CPU 0.1297, elapsed 0.4369 seconds.
80 queries taking 0.3661 seconds, 316 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.