February 14, 2005
Why Not Send Love Notes To This Good Friend Of The Military
Via
Blackfive:
On January 30th, 2005, Senator Kerry told Tim Russert on Meet the Press that he would sign an SF 180 in order to release all of his military records. So far, no signature.
Here's how you can help the senator keep his word.
[redacted to avoid frivolous and malicious claims by hypocritical and attention hungry public figures]
Posted by: annika at
11:14 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
1
She's at least got good educational tickets and is with a decent firm; shows you what happens when you marry down.
Posted by: shelly at February 14, 2005 02:03 PM (ywZa8)
2
What makes you think she doesn't share his looniness in full measure?
Posted by: Tony at February 15, 2005 08:09 PM (tjFjH)
3
Isn't that sweet? They were little undergrad flag-burner scumbags together.
Posted by: JD at February 21, 2005 06:57 AM (J+Gcr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Hello Young Lovers Wherever You Are
During my first year of undergrad i went out with a really sweet guy who used to
smother shower me with gifts and cards all the time. It was a very profitable relationship, from a material standpoint. But ultimately, he gave me too much attention.
Recently, i found one of the many love notes this guy sent me. It's pretty nice, so before i shred it, i thought i'd publish it for all the world to see, in honor of St. Valentine's Day. My apologies to its author, though i highly doubt that this guy has even heard of a blog; he wasn't the brightest bulb i've ever been with.
Dear Annie,
I miss you very much and I really need to be with you. It's really nice knowing that you're with me not just physically, but spiritually it is truly wonderful and very fulfilling. I'm very happy to have you in my life and I want us to always love one another. You are everything to me, you are my absolute world. I will always and remain being in love with you. Youre a natural high for me - everytime I think of you. You are the most wonderful gift God has ever given to me. I'll never stop loving you Annie. Never! I sometimes wonder what I did to deserve someone as special as you. I love you and I'll never be tired of saying I do. I just hope you don't get tired of me. I love you so much, and please always remember that. I hope to be yours forever.
Love ____.
That's beautiful ain't it? Re-reading it all these years later, i think the sentiment contains the perfect mixture of sappy teenage love cliché and creepy insecurity vibe. But hey, he was writing a new card every couple of days, it must have been hard to come up with new material all the time.
We broke up after he started calling me repeatedly at work, demanding to know "who is he?" To which i would answer, "there is no one else but you, dear." Of course i needn't mention to you that there actually was someone else. But i was younger then, and not as serious.
When we eventually broke up, my poor sweet boyfriend was very upset. Finally dumping him did not end the cards and gifts, though. But instead of giving them to me, he sent the gifts to my friends and family. The point was to make me feel guilty, i guess. i didn't really care. It was kind of weird and my friends thought it was creepy too. But they kept the gifts, lol.
Lest you think i'm too harsh, karma did catch up with me. i left the letter writer for the hottest guy, who was also quite a playa. He ended up breaking my heart terribly, and repeatedly, before i learned my lesson and moved on.
And yes, i'm probably gonna pay in karma for having posted that letter too.
Happy Valentine's Day!
Posted by: annika at
07:53 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 514 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Great post, Annie.
Yes, the insecurity -- and the sincerity -- come through perfectly. I suspect I wrote some notes very much like that in my youth...
Posted by: Hugo at February 14, 2005 08:19 AM (Qst0d)
2
So are you free this weekend?
We can discuss Palsgraf v. Long Island RR.
(Relax, just a joke.)
Posted by: Mark at February 14, 2005 10:08 AM (Vg0tt)
3
Oooo, can we talk about
International Shoe instead?
That way we can maintain minimum contact, yet still talk about shoes!
Posted by: annika at February 14, 2005 10:14 AM (zAOEU)
4
Sorry, i realized that the above joke was sooo inside that only law students and lawyers who have not totally repressed all memories of first year law would recognize the reference.
Posted by: annika at February 14, 2005 10:32 AM (zAOEU)
5
C'mon Annie:
No one who as suffered through law school could ever forget the trauma of Palsgraf. Just don't ask us to discuss it.
Regarding the note: it is no wonder the guy is gone. Leo the Lip once said "Nice guys don't win ball games". He was right.
But, since I have nothing to lose, I'll take a chance and wish you "Happy V-Day". Go have a red beer and dream of your first big paycheck as a lawyer.
Posted by: shelly at February 14, 2005 11:07 AM (+7VNs)
6
Shudder.
"You are everything to me, you are my absolute world."
If there's anything that I can impart to my daughter, it's that boys are not everything, and don't drop everything for a guy.
But she won't listen, because she is Young and Wise.
Way of the world...
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 14, 2005 02:45 PM (v9NCH)
7
I love you and I'll never be tired of saying I do. I just hope you don't get tired of me.
I look at lines like those as jinxes. The way I look at it, when someone says to me "I just hope you don't get tired of me," they're basically telling me that eventually, I WILL get tired of them. No good.
Happy Valentine's Day!
Posted by: Amy Bo Bamy at February 14, 2005 03:16 PM (RpVKX)
8
face forward annie dearest
Posted by: betsy trotter at February 15, 2005 04:26 AM (6SqAS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Grammy Roundup
Go directly to
Dizzy Girl for the snarkiest Grammy Roundup.
Grammy Awards...Tim McGraw...'Ramblin Man'...nightmare. WTF were they thinking? He sounds like someone squeezed his nuts really tight a few seconds before he took the stage. Faith seems to enjoy his performance though. Maybe she was the one squeezing dem nuts.
lol.
Posted by: annika at
12:28 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 53 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The latest on your idol:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6908974/
Posted by: jeff at February 14, 2005 07:49 AM (o1/lR)
2
Gah! Los Lonely *uckheads best duo? One-shot clowns..
Posted by: JD at February 21, 2005 07:06 AM (J+Gcr)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 13, 2005
Musical Fun Quiz
i stole this offa
Candace, who got it from
Kat:
Choose a band and answer only in song titles by that band: Sixpence None The Richer
Are you male or female? There She Goes
Describe yourself: Dancing Queen
How do some people feel about you? You're A Mean One Mr Grinch
How do you feel about yourself? I Just Wasn't Made for these Times
Describe your ex-boyfriend/ex-husband: Loser Like Me
Describe your current boyfriend/husband/infatuation: I Need Love
Describe what you want to be: Healer
Describe your current mood: Kiss Me
Describe your friends: Too Far Gone
Share a few words of wisdom: Don't Dream It's Over
Feel free to leave your own answers. i'm curious.
Posted by: annika at
11:43 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 121 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'll use latter period ("His 'n' Hers" and on) Pulp:
Are you male or female? I'm a Man
Describe yourself: This Is Hardcore
How do some people feel about you? Like a Friend
How do you feel about yourself? I Love Life
Describe your ex-girlfriend: She's a Lady
Describe your current infatuation: Lipgloss
Describe what you want to be: Common People
Describe your current mood: Happy Endings
Describe your friends: A Little Soul
Share a few words of wisdom: Party Hard/Help the Aged
That was fun!
Posted by: Micah at February 13, 2005 07:36 PM (v/oTo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 12, 2005
It's Not A Done Deal Yet
Howard Dean is now the
Democratic National Committee Chairman. Many of us on the right see this as a very positive development for Republicans. But it's not a done deal yet.
The Democrats are not stupid. Clueless, yes, but they're not unaware that we Republicans have been hoping that the end result of the Democratic Party's post-election soul searching would be a leftward over-correction. Knowing how happy we are at Dean's ascension, i would think that they'll try to mitigate their image problem with middle-of-the-road voters in time for the mid-term elections.
Plus, Howard Dean is energetic, smart, and the truth is, he's not quite as liberal as people think. Being anti-war made him the darling of the unwashed anti-globalization hippie crowd, but how many of them really understood his views on the less sexy issues. Like for instance, globalization. In any case, he's the DNC chair, not a candidate. And he has a proven record of innovative and effective fund raising.
Still, the DNC's choice signals that the party has decided to give the finger to the voices of reason who have been urging a move to the center since their November debacle. That's just crazy strategy.
What the Bush haters of the ultra-left do not understand is that in their zeal to transform America into their vision of the perfect atheist libertine utopia, they have abandoned the political center to the conservatives. If Republicans are not forced to fight for centrist voters, they will have no incentive to moderate the conservative policies that the left wants so desperately to destroy. The result is a party in power that feels free to move to the right.
i think you realize that i have no problem with that.
Here's how i see the next few years working out, though: A defiant Democratic Party (financed and led by the true-believers of the fringe left) insists on continuing the message of negativity that lost it the presidency in 2004. The mid-terms are a disaster as the Republican Party consolidates its power even further.
All the while, back-bencher Hillary Clinton lays low, putting distance between herself and her former, more shrill image. She reaches out to the political center. Then, at the right moment, she makes the long-expected announcement. Hillary rides in on her white horse, the best hope of the Party to save the Democrats from self-destruction by the far left.
Rank-and-file Democrats flock to her side in the early primaries, like they did to Kerry in '04, convinced of Hillary's "electability" over the more out-of-touch liberals favored by the party intelligentsia. (That's exactly why Kerry got the nomination, while the media was trying to convince everyone it would be Dean.)
Hillary, the so-called "smartest woman in the world" emerges, perfectly positioned to gobble up the center for Democrats who've grown tired of their years in the wilderness. And if the Republicans don't manage to find an exciting candidate to run against her in 2008, we may be in for the old Clinton bait-and-switch again.*
_______________
* That's when the candidate runs as a moderate, but as soon as the election is over, hits you with that old-time liberal agenda.
Cross-posted at A Western Heart.
Posted by: annika at
12:40 PM
| Comments (18)
| Add Comment
Post contains 545 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Don't take council of your fears. The parties will respectively elect in their primaries, candidates who reflect their spirit. The D's just get whackier and whackier. They're not without resources, but Dean is just a frosted flake who used his position as a candidate to salve his ego by taking something that he could.
The left has lied to itself, and believed. They tell themselves that they're the mainstream, but the last twenty years of political history has proved that they are not. They have not come to terms with the truth yet, and as all you twelve-steppers know, first you have to admit you have a problem. They don't think they do. It'll take them at least ten years to get there. Then they'll have to get someone to listen.
Posted by: Casca at February 12, 2005 01:23 PM (cdv3B)
2
yeah, clinton the liberal. Who enacted doma, welfare reform, nafta, return of the federal death penalty and the balanced budget at the cost of health care? Cause it wasn't no liberal. hahahahahahahaha
Posted by: Dawn Summers at February 12, 2005 06:21 PM (r32GN)
3
Dawn is closer to the truth than Casca.
One should never underestimate the urge for power. Ultimately, the Republicans in California came to terms with Pete Wilson, and he brought them eight years of Governorship. Then they got greedy and went for Dan Lungren. The result was Gray Davis.
The Democrats will find anyone they can to get back in the White House. Hillary is hip to that. Howard Dean, screamer that he is, was a moderate Governor of Vermont, plus, he's got a smart Jewish wife who will explain the facts of life to him.
As a moderate Republican, I am always concerned with the balance of power. Yes, I like it when we have R's running the show, but not to the extent that we lose sight of the middle. Once that happens, we are lost.
Hillary is the biggest threat to America I can imagine. Kerry, Michael Moore, Kennedy, Leahy, Pelosi, Reid, Shumer, etc. are a blessing to us, but we need to be careful of being careless.
The price of liberty is still eternal vigilance; let's not go to sleep or gloat too much.
Posted by: shelly at February 12, 2005 07:13 PM (6krEN)
4
Oh, Bill's a liberal all right. He just cares more about Bill Clinton than any principle.
Posted by: Matt at February 12, 2005 10:16 PM (TLYaI)
5
Shelly you don't know SHIT about California politics, or electoral politics in general. You can take your bullshit non-partisan judicial political experience and blow it out your meally-mouthed middle-of-the-road ass. That is all.
Posted by: Casca at February 12, 2005 10:42 PM (cdv3B)
6
The fact is, as long as the GWOT and homeland security are important issues with the electorate, a Democrat will not be elected. The Democrats have showed themselves to be unserious about defense and the protection of this country. Howard Dean represents that unseriousness. The Democrats can either join the political mainstream on defense, or they will have to wait for another "1992" when the electorate feels its safe to elect a Democrat.
Posted by: lawguy at February 13, 2005 12:15 AM (U0IaD)
7
Dean is, in fact, the very definition of a knee-jerk liberal. Just recall the "bike path" incident.
And putting him in as the Man In Charge of the Opposition to the Evil Republicans means his knees will be jerking constantly and with such magnificent force that he'll literally be kicking his own ass with every step.
And the Dems will keep him in because that's the kind of energy they seem to want right now.
Also because all the money supporting the party right now belongs to the moonbats.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 13, 2005 12:53 AM (eKgBm)
8
Clinton is always was, and still is a liberal; he's just a clever one. The stuff for which he takes credit was all conceived and carried by the Gingrich led Congress that was content to have its ideas stolen as long they were enacted into law. There was little Democratic congressional support for most of Clinton's "victories".
I guess, since Casca tells me so, that I don't know much about politics, which is pretty interesting inasmuch as I've made a pretty good living at it for over 40 years. But then again, I'm still learning, whereas he seems to know it all already.
Aren't we lucky he honors this site with his foul mouthed commentary?
Posted by: shelly at February 13, 2005 09:37 AM (ywZa8)
9
Clever/self-serving opportunist: You say tomato, I say tomahto.
Posted by: Matt at February 13, 2005 11:18 AM (TLYaI)
10
Ok, Ok, u DO know squat. How's that?
You posit that Cali Republicans are out of power because they failed to triangulate. Is that not what you're saying?
If so, you're wrong. If anything, two decades of nominating milquetoasts has given us the twin syphalitic twats of BB & Feinstein.
The obsticles facing the party here are:
Money - you just don't get bang for your buck in a California statewide race. Much cheaper to knock off the Senate Minority Leader in South Dakota. You might ponder how that was done considering Thune's views.
Geography - It's too fucking big, so it's complicated. It has all of the challanges of running a national campaign.
Demographics - There isn't a homogeneous culture. This place is crawling with aliens of all sort, legal and illegal. As a group they tend to be ignorant and uneducated, thus attracted to the boob bait. They also provide a ready pool of fraud voters for the Union Thugs.
Govenerment tit-suckers - Big budgets = lots of indolent fucks selling their souls for pieces of silver, and voting a straight ticket.
If you knew anything about real (not judicial) electoral politics, you'd know that the tightrope walked by ALL candidates is to appeal to the base in the primary (that's why the R's won't nominate Rudy, and the D's will go for the whackdoodle du jour if the msm isn't there to prop someone else up) then move back to the middle in the general. Judicial races are apples to oranges. Who the fuck ever knew what a judge stood for? You don't, because they don't.
Anni, when they come to kill all the lawyers, tell them you know me.
Posted by: Casca at February 13, 2005 11:47 AM (cdv3B)
11
Casca,
Chill. (& the lawyer quote you referenced was meant to speak of legislators, not attorneys.)
Miss Annika,
I disagree in part. The rpeubs don't need na ecxcuse to lean towards the center. That's where they see the majority of votes at. They need an excuse to lean right. So a weak Dem party won't make them feel free to get all uber-conservative. It'll make their drift towards the left easier to accomadate.
Look at the effect Arnie is or will soon be having on the Cali republican party. A RINO wins an election that will spur more RINO's not more McClintocks.
What escapes most people is that in politics winning often becomes more important than the ideas you wanted to win int he first place. Arnie was no conservative. Hell he was barely a republican. But republicans flocked to him because "he had a chance of winning". what you'll find is that the term RINO will become meaningless as the entire party will be filled with RINO's changing what republican means as a party. This will be in part due to natural tendencies but to some degree because the repubs don't have a conservative opposition party to keep them in line, or a large conservative base who is willing to put principle over party.
Posted by: Publicola at February 13, 2005 01:47 PM (KCKNs)
12
Casca:
If you are a lawyer, I suggest you either have your secretary proof read your stuff or get spellchecker.
Yes, I know a bit about judicial politics, but the first thing you have to know is that there are few elections. The politics are in the appointment process, not the one or two elections we have each two years or so.
That has nothing to do with why California is owned by the Democrats, temporarily. That began in the late 50's, when we had it all. Earl Warren was the Republican Governor, Goodie Knight the Lt. Gov., and an arrogant guy named William Knowland was the U.S. Senator and a power in the U.S. Senate. His family had owned the Oakland Trib for years and he decided that when Warren was appointed Chief Justice (a deal that got Nixon[our other Senator] the VP slot) he'd just run for Governor against our own incumbent, Goodie Knight, who became Gov. when Warren was appointed.
Knight had nowhere to go, so he ran for Senator, and that was the beginning of Democratic control of California. Pat Brown, the former DA of SF was AG and ran for Governor and won; Clair Engel, a Red Bluff Congressman was elected Senator, and Mosk became AG. We still had Kuchel as the other Senator, but he was more Demo than they, even though he had an (R.) after his name.
Since then it has been uphill. Reagan almost turned it around, and we got Deuk elected because California was not ready for a black Governor (Bradley) and Pete elected because he had beaten Jerry Brown for the senate eight years earlier and could win.
But we have lost it in the Assembly and Senate, because without Pete to veto the reapportionment, Brulte cut a deal to keep all our Congressmen and gave up a chance to get a much better and meaningful share of the Assembly and Senate. Gray went along because he didn't care about the House at the time.
The party cannot seem to put up a decent candidate to beat either Diane or Barbara. Tom Campbell could have in the first election against Barbara, but the White House kept Sonny Bono in and he pulled enough of the moderate vote to let Herschenson squeek through by 2%. It was the worst mistake we made, of all of them. Tom is now Finance Director for Arnold and if Arnold pulls this off, it is only because Tom is brilliant and will devise the strategy and work the numbers.
But, you're right, what the Hell do I know?
Well, not much, but if we could get open primaries, I know we could get back to electing folks in the center who could govern this state without referendums and initiatives in vast quantities.
Arnold is the best chance we've had in years, but he'd never have been nominated by his party initially. Hell, Simon beat Riordan and gave it to Gray the second time. To quote Pogo, "We have met the enemy and he is us". Or, better yet, to quote Chuck Muth, "Republicans never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity".
Last point: Everyone thought that with Bush's election, Calfornia could get some coattail help. But the person designated by the Bush folks was not concerned with that; he was only concerned with reelecting Bush, consequently, the California Party was starved out. No stars came to help raise money, except for Bush, which promptly got sent elsewhere. The RNC guys controlled all the cards, until Arnold came along and changed things a little. Now there is a chance to change things a lot with the initiative process plan he is advancing.
Intead of crying about things, here is a real opportunity to change the climate in California. Will business put up the bucks and will the voters do it?
Stand by...
Posted by: shelly at February 13, 2005 02:13 PM (+7VNs)
13
Publicola, see my comments below in re: condescending prick.
Shell:
LMAO, so I made a couple typos did I? Where is it that lawyers learn to be such condescending pricks?
Well at least your comments are finally substantive. You miss it though when you expect anything to come from the national party or politicians in general. They merely react to reality. Most just want power, and will bend in any direction required to gain or maintain it. So issues for the professional pol are so much window-dressing.
"Everyone thought that with Bush's election, Calfornia could get some coattail help." I never thought that. Go back and read what I wrote before. If the state fields weak Republican statewide candidates, it is because intelligent people do not risk their reputations and their fortunes in vain pursuits.
Republican hopes in California are problematic for the reasons that I've listed above. I'm afraid that we're fated to be under the boot of the legislature until there is a seismic shift in the electorate. My one hope for Arnie, is that he could be that seismic force. I'm convinced that issues are secondary to him. He'd much rather build a dynasty, and if he's for that, I'm for him. Reagan was the ultimate political pragmatist, and he's walking in his footsteps.
Posted by: Casca at February 13, 2005 09:32 PM (cdv3B)
14
Casca, there are some excellent
decaffienated coffees out there, you know.
Posted by: annika at February 13, 2005 10:15 PM (g25kj)
15
Ahhhhh yeeeeeeess, never touch the stuff. Fish fuck in it.
Posted by: Casca at February 13, 2005 10:20 PM (cdv3B)
16
Casca,
In regards to the condescending prick line...
So, do you avoid decaf cause the fish intercourse extract turns you on & you feel guilty (you misunderstood that phrase "sleeps with the fishes" didn't ya?), or is it because the thought of fish engaging in an activity that you are inferior at (even whenst alone - well that would be the majority of the time wouldn't it?) disturbs you?
That's approaching condescending. Condecending is not a simple admonition to chill & a correction on a misunderstanding of a line that's been kicked around a few centuries.
Now if you wish to see how condescending I can be you're welcome to, but ya might wanna grab your favorite teddy bear/blankie/marital aid so you don't lose sight of the fact that it's only your feelings & self esteem that were obliterated.
Or you could tone down the ametuer lip & we could have a meaningful discussion about some points that you raised. Yo' dime; you make the call.
Shelly,
I can respect your insight & your predictions/suppositions, but honestly from everything I've seen Cali seems like a lost cause. Even if the repubs did make some headway there it'd be at the expense of what the repubs used ot stand for (smaller government, etc...) & become a substitute for what the dems stood for (government is the means, etc...) & I fear that would drag the national scene down the same path (well, faster than it's going currently. Do you honestly think that there is a way to salvage Cali that's do-able?
Posted by: Publicola at February 14, 2005 12:19 AM (KCKNs)
17
Publicola:
Thannks for the thoughts, likewise, Annie; you made me LOL.
However, the answer is pretty much the way Casca describes it. I'm kind of surprised to hear it from him, especially after he called me meally-mouthed (sic.)middle of the road, etc. But, that is exactly what it takes for the R's to come back around here.
Arnold is the consumate middle of the road guy, which is a good reason for me to support him. Pete was the same. The conservatives hated Pete (still do) and they really don't much like Arnold, except, they like winning. Funny, that's what I always thought might be important. Hard to move your agenda when you are an "out" instead of an "in". Even my buddy Tom Campbell, another middle of the roader, has finally figured that one out.
So, yes, I totally support Arnold. I've raised and given way more than I can afford, but intend to keep it up as long as it moves in the right direction.
His appointment of McPherson to Secretary of State is classic. The Dem's are in a lose-lose. Surrender or eat poop for fighting it; Arnopld is taking it to them. Perata has surrendered; Nunez is still considering.
So, having learned as a judge to listen to the message and ignore the messenger, I say Casca's right on this one.
And, by the way, my wife thinks I'm a condescending prick as well, so he may be right on that one too. That's what happens when you get used to winning. Maybe it'll happen to Casca once he gets the hang of it.
Posted by: shelly at February 14, 2005 12:20 PM (+7VNs)
18
Pube, never fear. You'd have to hold a reader's attention long enough for them to care. Aside from your general demeanor, you're a snore.
Posted by: Casca at February 14, 2005 04:25 PM (cdv3B)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Eason Jordan Gone?
i'm amazed at the speed with which
this under-the-radar scandal took him down. i'm not surprised that his resignation was announced on Friday afternoon, after the talk radio shows were over.
i would have expected Jordan to fight this longer. Big media has to be pissed as the number of news execs run out of town by the blogosphere continues to grow.
Expect future calls for legislative action to control blogs. Because, make no mistake, Jordan was kooky for years, but the story that did him in was completely ignored outside the blogosphere.
Mark at Decision '08 notes that in contrast to Rathergate,
This time it was the bloggers, and the bloggers alone, that pushed this man out. That will be heady stuff for some; it will scare the pants off of others...but what does it mean, really? Have we entered an era where our lives can be destroyed by a pack of wolves hacking at their keyboards with no oversight, no editors, and no accountability? Or does it mean that we've entered a brave new world where the MSM has become irrelevant?
Maybe not irrelevant, but more accountable, less hubristic. That can only be for the good.
It's ironic that an entire generation of journalists, who consider their greatest accomplishment to be the forced resignation of Richard Nixon, must now look over their own shoulders and fear a new generation of muckrakers.
Update: Jungle Book lovers, like myself, will enjoy this witty take-off by Vanderleun at American Digest. Excerpt:
Ye may post for yourselves, and your country, blog your cats if you must, and ye can;
But post not for pleasure of sacking unless you sack Eason Jordan!
Ha ha.
Posted by: annika at
09:31 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 283 words, total size 2 kb.
1
hey! hope all is good with you... as i started to write... my boo came on... and had this urge to call my ex... plus i read your poem on britney & Federline... god knows what got into me.. heee... then jessica simpson came on... and now i feel dumb... anyways... i guess i bla too much... not all the time i feel like that but most of the time i do... i see you have a lovely pic from like 20-30... beautiful... take care... ciao
Posted by: maizzy at February 12, 2005 12:52 PM (lDnWN)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 11, 2005
A Page From The Notebook Of Bill Clinton's Psychiatrist
February 11, 2005
Patient: William J. Clinton
The president confessed this morning his closely held ambition regarding the UN job. Haven't seen him this animated in session since early in second term. Believes Secretary Generalship would provide opportunity for personal growth.
Kept obsessing about secret plan of his to improve Russo-American relations. Pressed him for details, but he only made vague reference to a recurring dream he's been having nightly.
Says dream is extremely vivid, and takes place deep within a Russian forest. Refused to elaborate. Must explore further at next session.
Posted by: annika at
04:55 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 110 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 13, 2005 10:22 PM (muth+)
2
Annika, is that you? Nice tan..
Posted by: JD at February 20, 2005 12:51 PM (J+Gcr)
3
No no, that's Ana Kournikova. Thus the whole Russian forest joke, which nobody got.
Posted by: annika at February 20, 2005 01:53 PM (DcRyj)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Valentine's Day Poetry Contest At ASV
Hey poetry contest lovers, Michele is having
a V-Day poetry contest. It must follow the "roses are red..." format, and must be addressed from one famous person to another. Sounds like fun.
i'm formulating an entry in my head right now. Hmmm.
Update: Okay, here's mine:
Brittany Spears to Kevin Federline:
Roses are red
Violets are blue
Stop fucking around
And help me feed Lacy Loo*
Kevin Federline back to Brittany Spears:
Roses are red
and sometimes they're yellow
I started cheating on you
'Cuz your feet stink like hello
(I mean, they really smello)**
_______________
* Lacy Loo reference explained here.
** stink reference explained here.
Posted by: annika at
12:59 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I don't habitually speak this way of women, but
what a dumb, trailer trash whore. And she's not looking too good these days, either. (Well, that is, not as good as she looked a year or two ago.) See
here,
here, and
here.
Posted by: Matt at February 11, 2005 05:18 PM (TLYaI)
2
Roses are red,
Violets are blue;
I shouldn't have kissed you
When you had the flu.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 11, 2005 05:56 PM (e6fDY)
3
Um. You know. 'Cause I'm sure there's a celebrity out there who got sick recently.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 11, 2005 05:57 PM (e6fDY)
Posted by: annika at February 11, 2005 06:07 PM (QPZrJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Poll Results
The poll results are in. You've decided that the best replacement for Dan Rather at the CBS Evening news is actor Keanu Reeves. With 63% of the vote, support for Mr. Reeves was more than five times that of his closest competitor, über-news-tart Kiki Couric.
Mr. Reeves' journalistic credentials are unclear, however many experts believe that CBS executives should not worry about a lack of news experience, given the current state of the CBS Nightly News' ratings and credibility.
Keanu Reeves, 40, is perhaps best known for his role as Neo, the stoic hero of the Matrix film trilogy. His other credits include Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure, in which he played Ted, and Speed, opposite co-stars Dennis Hopper and Sandra Bullock. Others may remember Mr. Reeves best for his early starring role with River Phoenix in the 1991 film My Own Private Idaho.
Mr. Phoenix could not be reached for comment.
Posted by: annika at
07:18 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 156 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: other Annika at February 11, 2005 09:48 AM (5BpN4)
2
I can just picture a newscast:
"And this just in . . .
[reads teleprompter, lips moving]
"
Woah! Duuuude, that's
gnarly!
Posted by: ccwbass at February 11, 2005 12:36 PM (jrQAx)
3
I'm sorry that I didn't realize that a vote was going on. I would have voted for the "Dude! You're getting a Dell" guy. ("Woah! Like, bombs and stuff in the Middle East!")
In the 1980s, David Letterman and his staff published a book which, among many other things, suggested that Tom Brokaw should be partnered with a co-anchor: "Velvet, the News Dude."
You've probably already discussed this, but I wonder why CBS was unable to select a permanent anchor, and just grabbed Bob Schieffer. NBC has obviously been grooming Brian Williams to replace Brokaw, but why couldn't CBS do something similar? And who is in line to replace Jennings? (Diane Sawyer might work; she even has a resume that is attractive to the baby seal clubbers.)
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 11, 2005 12:43 PM (FPdMX)
4
Ontario Emperor, the "dude, you're getting a Dell" guy was an undergrad classmate of mine. I'd say he hasn't gotten any more annoying since then, but only because that's probably physically impossible. Thank God that campaign seems to have ended.
Posted by: Dave J at February 11, 2005 08:15 PM (CYpG7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 10, 2005
High School Quiz Meme
Here's a quiz about the High School years, you might find mildly interesting.
What year was it?
1991 to 1995
What were your three favorite bands (performers)?
Red Hot Chili Peppers, REM, Smashing Pumpkins
What was your favorite outfit?
i don't know about favorite, but i had this awesome mustardy rayon skirt from Ann Taylor that i wore with a long sweater and clogs. It was fantastic.
What was up with your hair?
Freshman and sophomore year it was long and straight with long bangs, beginning of junior year it was long and jet black. Senior year it was blonde again and shoulder length.
Who were your best friends?
Francine, Holly, Larissa, April
What did you do after school?
Cheerleading, tennis & theatre.
Where did you work?
i worked at an awful pizza restaurant for a one month in my junior year, but that was it.
Did you take the bus?
Yes, but we lived far from the bus stop, so my dad had to drop me off. Often we'd time it wrong, and he'd have to chase after the bus, cut in front of it and drop me a couple of stops down the line. The bus driver hated us.
Who did you have a crush on?
A senior who's initials were D. M.!
Did you fight with your parents?
Yes, we had awful fights. Especially me and my mom. i thought that they were too strict and never let me go anywhere or do anything. Of course, now i think i'll be even more strict with my own kids.
Who did you have a CELEBRITY crush on?
i was in love with Johnny Depp before it was cool to be. i'm talking stalker type love.
Did you smoke cigarettes?
Not until i got to college.
Did you lug all of your books around in your backpack all day because you were too nervous to find your locker?
No. Why would anybody do that?
Did you have a ‘clique’?
Not really. i had trouble fitting into cliques, so i tried to be friendly with all of them, like the theatre clique, the goth clique, the football clique, the hippie clique. My closest friends were geeks though.
Did you have “The Max” like Zach, Kelly, and Slater?
Does McDonald's count?
Admit it, were you popular?
i didn't think so, not even after i got into theatre and started going out with boys.
Who did you want to be just like?
Tonya Harding
(lol, kidding)
What did you want to be when you grew up?
i wanted to be a psychotherapist.
Where did you think youÂ’d be at the age you are now?
27 sounded like old age to me back then. i had no concept of the future.
i found this at Amy's (who's got a great new blog design, btw.)
Posted by: annika at
08:48 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 479 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I never knew I was popular until the 5th high school reunion. I highly recommend these because reunions are fun and cosmicpayback is a bitch!
Posted by: EBR at February 11, 2005 05:26 AM (i/SEr)
2
"What year was it?
1991 to 1995"
So you graduated ONLY 14 years after I did. Whipper-snapper.
Posted by: physics geek at February 11, 2005 08:42 AM (Xvrs7)
3
And ten years after me...
I too went through a period of wanting to be a psycho-therapist. How interesting. (And then, I found out about all the science I would have to take.)
Posted by: Hugo at February 11, 2005 09:14 AM (q10C+)
4
Nobody else is taking the quiz. Are we suppose to take the quiz? I'll take the quiz.
What year was it?
1985-89
What were your three favorite bands (performers)?
Iron Maiden, The Scorpions, Metallica
What was your favorite outfit?
Boys don't have "outfits." My favorite article of clothing was my bomber jacket, until I got my letter jacket. Then it became my favorite. I still have both, though they don't fit as well now.
What was up with your hair?
Short. Sophomore year it might have been three four or five inches long. (I thought I looked like a hippy.) Parted from the left, except sophomore year when I got bold and tried a down-the-middle part. Junior and senior years? Think Gunny Highway.
Who were your best friends?
Nate, Trevor, Scott, and Kevin (who went to a neighborhing HS) until he went off to Ball State my senior year.
What did you do after school?
Football, wrestling, lifting in the off season, homework.
Where did you work?
I poured concrete floors for commercial buildings one summer, and spent another summer cutting sheets of rubber into strips for use in the RV industry.
Did you take the bus?
No, I walked or rode my bike (it was maybe a mile) until I got a car. After the car broke down, Iwas back to walking and riding.
Who did you have a crush on?
Oh, God -- there were
so many . . . Marie and De*****, to name two.
Did you fight with your parents?
No, not really.
Who did you have a CELEBRITY crush on?
Cindy Crawford, of course.
Did you smoke cigarettes?
Nope.
Did you lug all of your books around in your backpack all day because you were too nervous to find your locker?
Yes, but with decreasing frequency. All the time freshman year, less sophomore year, and never as a junior or senior. I didn't use my backpack, though -- I just carried a huge armload of books. And no one f***ed with me, because I was the 6'1" freshman. (That may not seem unusual today, but I think kids are getting bigger. I was bigger than many of the seniors, then.)
Did you have a ‘clique’?
I was on the periphery of the jock and prep cliques, and got along well with most people in both of them but wasn't really a member of either. Nate was my connection to the preps, Scott and Trev to the jocks.
Did you have “The Max” like Zach, Kelly, and Slater?
No. A few fast food restaurants, but none that were consistent hangouts.
Admit it, were you popular?
Not particularly. I was big, and geeky, and precocious, and socially awkward, and you had to be pretty gregarious -- or just "get" me from the start -- to get past that. In retrospect, I think many people were a little intimidated by me. I came into my own a little more during my senior year.
Who did you want to be just like?
I don't think I had one particular role model. I was very impressed with Ollie North, though.
What did you want to be when you grew up?
A Marine officer.
Where did you think youÂ’d be at the age you are now?
A Marine officer. Unmarried, no kids. Perhaps doing something exciting in South or Central America.
Posted by: Matt at February 11, 2005 12:22 PM (SIlfx)
5
Or even "supposeD to take the quiz"!
Posted by: Matt at February 11, 2005 12:35 PM (SIlfx)
6
Ollie North? Wasn't that back in the Iran Contra hearing days?
Posted by: annika at February 11, 2005 05:18 PM (QPZrJ)
7
Damn straight! Annie, the Iran-Contra story broke in late 1986, at the beginning of my sophomore year in high school, and the hearings got underway in the spring of '87. Of course you were ten or elven then, so it seems like ancient history to you. I remember watching clips of Ollie in front of Congress on the evening news.
BTW, I'm no longer a big fan of Ollie, though I enjoyed his reports as an embedded reporter during the invasion of Iraq. At least he had a freaking clue, and no shortage of balls.
Posted by: Matt at February 11, 2005 05:33 PM (TLYaI)
8
Hell yah. i remember Iran Contra. Watching the late Arthur Liman was the first time i ever saw what a tough cross-examination looked like in real life. He was amazing.
Posted by: annika at February 11, 2005 06:05 PM (QPZrJ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
TV Trivia
Without Googling: who did the voice of Pebbles Flintstone in the 1971-72 Saturday morning cartoon,
The Pebbles and Bamm-Bamm Show?
Hint: she's better known for her work on a night-time TV show, which also premiered in 1971.
And while we're on the subject. Does it seem strange to you that Pebbles and Bamm-Bamm grew up next door to each other, and their parents were best friends, but they ended up dating in High School? i mean, isn't that almost like dating your sibling? You'd think they'd want to branch out a little.
Posted by: annika at
04:19 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 96 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Karen Valentine? Mary Tyler Moore? Suzanne Pfleshette?
Posted by: Tuning Spork at February 10, 2005 06:32 PM (FVav8)
Posted by: annika at February 10, 2005 06:46 PM (PFxR6)
3
No, NO, and NO is right! Admittedly, I'm some distance from feverish testosterone fueled male teenage lust, but the most obvious object of desire is the tart next door.
Posted by: Casca at February 10, 2005 07:29 PM (cdv3B)
4
I had to google the answer. That's a great trivia question!
Posted by: Victor at February 11, 2005 05:44 AM (L3qPK)
5
I did NOT Google the answer. However, you failed to mention a little search engine called A9.
Interesting answer. I had no idea that she had actually worked between her stint on the sitcom and her attempt to devour the world.
Posted by: physics geek at February 11, 2005 08:48 AM (Xvrs7)
6
I never really put it together before, but I can still hear that voice in my head.
Sally Struthers
I'll be seeking help now.
Posted by: JP at February 11, 2005 09:10 AM (6mijs)
7
Righto, JP!
Now, besides having annoying voices and ballooning waistlines, what else do Sally Struthers and Jennifer Tilly have in common?
Posted by: annika at February 11, 2005 09:41 AM (zAOEU)
8
Pebbles and Bamm-Bamm probably had a relationship of convenience.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 11, 2005 12:45 PM (FPdMX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Welcome To The Club, Assholes
Someone new has crashed the party, although it's not like we weren't expecting them. Add North Korea to
this list:
The United States
Great Britian
France
Russia
China
India
Pakistan
Israel
South Africa (quit the club in 1991)
i knew this was inevitable. South Africa's experience notwithstanding, how do you put the genie back in the bottle? Looking at things from the dictator's perspective, what incentive do they have not to lie, delay and continue jerking off the international community until they have a fully stocked arsenal? Who's going to stop them? A nuclear arsenal enables North Korea to bully their neighbors even more easily, why would anyone expect them to voluntarily negotiate away that power?
Now it looks like we're stuck in South Korea, as an already bad situation has gotten much, much worse.
Posted by: annika at
09:23 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'm not quite sure how this changes anything. North Korea has always SAID a lot of things--including that it WASN'T working on nuclear weapons. And I'm pretty sure we've been planning assuming they did. If anything, this is a reason to pull our troops out of South Korea and to areas where they won't be incinerated in case of attack.
Posted by: ken at February 10, 2005 09:49 AM (xD5ND)
2
I'm pretty sure this only confirms what we already knew. Assuming they're not lying about
this. . .
Posted by: Matt at February 10, 2005 01:25 PM (SIlfx)
3
Matt's right, there's nothing unexpected here, and in the twisted mind of Kim Bung Hol, it was the next logical step. He wanted bi-lateral talks with us so he could extort money from us, like he did with those no-good cocksuckers Willie and Jimmy. W wouldn't play dat game, and insisted in multi-lateral regional talks with his neighbors. Ultimately, the ChiComs will send him the message, "When we want shit out of you, we'll squeeze your head".
Besides, I still have that one in the basement that Rog gave me, and I know for a fact that his barn is FULL of them, second amendment ya know.
Posted by: Casca at February 10, 2005 04:06 PM (cdv3B)
4
Did i not say: "i knew this was inevitable?"
Posted by: annika at February 10, 2005 04:22 PM (zAOEU)
5
"Did i not say: 'i knew this was inevitable?'"
Isn't it curious that the answers
"Yes, you did not" and
"No, you did not" mean the same thing? Jus' sayin' is all.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at February 10, 2005 06:37 PM (FVav8)
6
For the record, we're not in Korea to keep the NorK's from coming South, but vice versa.
Posted by: Casca at February 10, 2005 07:34 PM (cdv3B)
Posted by: Ted at February 11, 2005 05:11 AM (blNMI)
8
The logical thing to do would be to give nukes to Japan and South Korea. That would wake China up.
Posted by: Drew at February 11, 2005 08:39 AM (3MNCN)
9
i thought about the idea of universal proliferation, but there's a tremendous downside to that, especially with countries like Iran in control of fanatics who don't care about the MAD deterrent.
Posted by: annika at February 11, 2005 09:10 AM (zAOEU)
10
Japan has GOT to be working on something. Yes, I know about Hiroshima and Nagasaki and we love peace bla bla bla, but they've GOT to be working on something.
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 11, 2005 12:47 PM (FPdMX)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 09, 2005
Painful But True Quote Of The Day
From Candace:
I could write back to every single one of those desperate webcam guys with 'You are a complete and total loser,' because seriously, when a blogger tells you that you have no life outside the internet, it's for real, dudes.
Ouch.
Read at Candied Ginger.
Posted by: annika at
03:42 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.
Wednesday Is Poetry Day
It's also Ash Wednesday, so i had no choice but to post an excerpt from T. S. Eliot's long poem of the same name.
i've given up trying to figure out Eliot. i've concluded that it's more about how his art makes you feel. Just like looking at a Kandinsky, or listening to Ornette Coleman. If the message could have been communicated in prose, it would have been. But that was not what the artist intended.
Still i get the vague feeling that Eliot is writing about mortality here, but then the title is a big clue. By mortality, i mean more than just death, but all the limitations of a mortal life. All those things that are so maddeningly finite while we are here on earth: our knowledge, our understanding, and our strength of will.
If you are able to, try reading this thing out loud. For meter and rhyme, it is a fabulous piece of writing.
Ash Wednesday (excerpt)
Because I do not hope to turn again
Because I do not hope
Because I do not hope to turn
Desiring this man's gift and that man's scope
I no longer strive to strive towards such things
(Why should the aged eagle stretch its wings?)
Why should I mourn
The vanished power of the usual reign?
Because I do not hope to know again
The infirm glory of the positive hour
Because I do not think
Because I know I shall not know
The one veritable transitory power
Because I cannot drink
There, where trees flower, and springs flow, for there is nothing again
Because I know that time is always time
And place is always and only place
And what is actual is actual only for one time
And only for one place
I rejoice that things are as they are and
I renounce the blessed face
And renounce the voice
Because I cannot hope to turn again
Consequently I rejoice, having to construct something
Upon which to rejoice
And pray to God to have mercy upon us
And pray that I may forget
These matters that with myself I too much discuss
Too much explain
Because I do not hope to turn again
Let these words answer
For what is done, not to be done again
May the judgement not be too heavy upon us
Because these wings are no longer wings to fly
But merely vans to beat the air
The air which is now thoroughly small and dry
Smaller and dryer than the will
Teach us to care and not to care
Teach us to sit still.
Pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death
Pray for us now and at the hour of our death.
The rest of the poem is similar, although different religious themes are explored, in an equally indecipherable manner. What fascinates me the most is how the rhythm becomes almost
hip-hop in places.
Against the Word the unstilled world still whirled
About the centre of the silent Word.
O my people, what have I done unto thee.
Where shall the word be found, where will the word
Resound? Not here, there is not enough silence
Not on the sea or on the islands, not
On the mainland, in the desert or the rain land,
For those who walk in darkness
Both in the day time and in the night time
The right time and the right place are not here
No place of grace for those who avoid the face
No time to rejoice for those who walk among noise and deny the voice
i swear that sounds like rap. Someone should really put a beat to it.
Posted by: annika at
01:42 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 620 words, total size 3 kb.
February 08, 2005
The Oldest Trick In The Plaintiff's Book
Brittany Spears
is suing her insurance companies after they refused to pay her multi-million dollar claim.
Britney Spears has filed a $9.8 million lawsuit in New York to cover the losses for her canceled Onyx Hotel Tour.
Spears called off the 2004 tour after suffering a knee injury, but several insurers refused to make up the amount she lost because on the insurance applications, Spears checked 'no' to the question of pre-existing injuries, Celebrity Justice reports.
Spears had undergone minor knee surgery [on the same knee] five years before she signed the applications. She claims she simply forgot about the surgery because it was so long ago and she had fully recovered.
Now the lesson here is, don't lie on your insurance application. It's the oldest trick in the plaintiff's book: hide your pre-existing injuries. Usually it's done after the claim is made, but in Brittany's case, she did it on the application.
What's wrong with that? Well from a theoretical standpoint, it's borderline fraudulent. She offered to enter into a contract with the insurance company without disclosing information that would be directly relevant to the amount of premium they would agree to charge her. In other words, she was arguably ripping off her insurance companies.
People do this all the time. When i worked on auto cases for insurance company clients, the most common scenario was the person who lied about thier address to get a better rate. Other people lie about the length of their commute. Sometimes, after making a claim, they'd lie about who was actually driving the car, or whether a relative lived in the same house, in order to get around an exclusion in the contract.
When you're talking 9.8 mil, i can understand why the insurance company would use any defense they can find to get out of paying on the claim. Of course, that's what insurance companies do best anyways: weasel out of paying claims. It's all a part of the game.
Posted by: annika at
01:42 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 338 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'll remember that. So what's the BEST way to commit insurance fraud?
Posted by: Casca at February 08, 2005 04:34 PM (cdv3B)
2
I work in property claims and the fraud is incredible. Some losses never happened, on others people figure they'll pad their claim a bit to get their premiums back.
Posted by: The Angle of Repose at February 08, 2005 07:20 PM (S1tOs)
3
Is it just me or does Britney become even more white trash with each passing day?
Posted by: Micah at February 09, 2005 06:56 AM (v/oTo)
4
Annika, you're so smart.
Jason H.
Austin, Texas
Posted by: Jason H. at February 09, 2005 07:21 AM (0pVR8)
5
She must be new at this. Insurance companies don't like to pay claims. They are selling "peace of mind". Make a claim; get a cancellation notice.
In this instance, a relevant omission is a pretty strong defense to paying the claim. Most likely she'll get her premiums back, which is more than she deserves.
Posted by: shelly at February 10, 2005 06:24 AM (6krEN)
6
YEah, I'm sure that in her warped perception of the world, the laws governing fraud don't apply to her. She's an idiot.
(Psst...Hey Annika, nice to meet you...the Maximum Leader speaks highly of you. In addition, I hear you are a law student as well. My condolences;-)
Posted by: Sadie at February 10, 2005 11:57 PM (4CLu3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
KISS This Contest Goodbye
Allright, i guess i've dragged out this suspense bullshit long enough. i told you i had decision-making issues.
The winner of the KISS haiku contest is a poem that, i think, most completely encapsulates the kick-ass, devil-may-care, throw-caution-to-the-wind, damn-the-torpedoes, rock-and-roll-all-nite attitude of that band we all know and love to hate. Or not.
Here's the scene:
It's 7:30 on a humid summer night at the Macon County fair in central Illinois. The livestock awards have been handed out. A small crowd fills the rodeo grandstand, waiting for KISS to arrive. Finally, a half hour late, Gene and the boys take the stage (fucked up already) and rip through a cover of the Pointer Sisters' "I'm So Excited," followed by a medley including "Rock and Roll All Nite," "Lick It Up," "Love Gun," and "Detroit Rock City," which they rename "Decatur Rock City," in honor of the occasion.
Somewhere out in the crowd is a young girl, stringy blonde hair, red gingham sundress, who catches Gene's fancy even though she doesn't appear to be singing along to "Shout It Out Loud" like her parents. He tries, but he can't seem to make eye contact with the girl, so he sends a roadie to invite her backstage after the big encore set, which tonight will include "God of Thunder," "Calling Dr. Love," and Queen's "We Are The Champions."
After the performance, Gene waits by the catering truck, but the girl doesn't show. Chagrined, he heads back to the bus, for the long ride to Sedalia. Hopefully they'll find a Hooters along the way. But then, as if out of a dream, he sees the object of his desire in the parking lot, about to open the rear door of her parents' F-150 crew-cab. He struts over to the truck as fast as his six inch platform shoes will allow and...
more...
Posted by: annika at
12:33 AM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 356 words, total size 2 kb.
1
When Cameron was in Egypt land...
Let my Cameron run!
Congratulations, dammit.
Kevin
Posted by: Kevin Kim at February 08, 2005 02:47 AM (5GgXN)
2
Well, I mean, that is to say: golly!
In celebration of my triumph, please allow to post this link to
a very appropriate picture over at Sobekpundit.
In the meantime I'm feeling a definite urge to rock'n'roll at least until, say, 3:04 am California time, at which point I shall retire. But never fear! When I arise at noon it shall most certainly be to party for at least the remainder of the afternoon.
Better send that e-mail off.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 08, 2005 02:54 AM (XuVH/)
3
Great choice Annie, but, can you share with us the secret?
What's the prize?
Posted by: shelly at February 08, 2005 03:44 AM (6krEN)
4
Wild picture. Is this a new trend? KISS blogging?
And the prize is a very cool item from my stash of annika's journal merch.
Posted by: annika at February 08, 2005 07:16 AM (nKuEn)
5
BOOO! EMILY WUZ ROBBED!
...I mean, congratulations, Cameron!
Posted by: Victor at February 08, 2005 07:19 AM (L3qPK)
6
Oh no, Victor. Cameron's haiku is the work of genius and far superior to my own. I would have been shamed by victory.
Posted by: Emily at February 08, 2005 08:39 AM (JmXeT)
7
Huzzah. Genius, maybe. The best of the bunch, definitely.
Posted by: Hugo at February 08, 2005 10:27 AM (q10C+)
8
"Huzzah. Genius, maybe. The best of the bunch, definitely."
Looks like I find a new quote for the top o' the blog. Gracias, Amigo!
Posted by: ccwbass at February 08, 2005 11:43 AM (dYbjN)
9
That haiku desereves to be written on a velvet painting of Gene and hung under a black light in my basement.
I bow.
Posted by: michele at February 08, 2005 01:52 PM (c9A+j)
10
Gosh! Praise from Da Queen. I'm flattered.
Maybe I should specialize in tongue haikus.
...
Nah. I'd just screw it up.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 08, 2005 02:46 PM (c4nfH)
11
Clearly, the fix is in.
Posted by: Casca at February 08, 2005 04:38 PM (cdv3B)
Posted by: Ted at February 09, 2005 09:13 AM (blNMI)
13
Your story made me see that haiku in a whole new light. I think you made the right choice!
Posted by: Tuning Spork at February 10, 2005 06:47 PM (FVav8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
February 06, 2005
Quote Of The Night (And A Zoological Explanation)
Michael Jackson:
I'm very strong. I have rhinoceros skin.
He's obviously talking about
this rhinoceros, not
this one.
Posted by: annika at
08:17 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: jtb-in-texas at February 07, 2005 05:14 AM (oPLPa)
2
No doubt, He'd have to be the rhino with the fucked up horn.
Posted by: J-Mo at February 07, 2005 06:30 AM (/R7NU)
3
I've never seen a rhinoceros with an umbrella.
Maybe the guy is trying to set up an insanity plea. I wonder how his creditors feel about that.
Posted by: shelly at February 07, 2005 10:02 AM (6krEN)
4
DAMN IT!!! I can't believe I missed the interview. WAAAA.
Posted by: Dawn Summers at February 07, 2005 07:40 PM (xAVt3)
5
Someone needs to tell him that getting Rhinoplasty does not give one Rhino skin.
Posted by: Trevor at February 08, 2005 05:02 PM (RwZxT)
6
How can you be racist against someone from another planet?
Related material:
[1] [2]
Posted by: Ontario Emperor at February 08, 2005 09:43 PM (muth+)
7
Thank for this great post, i like what you read
Menu Board. Thumbs up, and keep it going!Thanks for sharing I’ll email my friends about this too
LED Billboard. This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw
Led Signboard.Thanks for posting this informative article
LED writing board. I look forward to more updates and will be returning.Cheers!
Posted by: Advertising signs at January 21, 2011 03:52 AM (zpIH7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
KISS Haiku Contest Update
i've narrowed it down to ten finalists in my
haiku contest. i wanted to make it nine, but i just can't bring myself to cut one from the list. i think the finalists represent a pretty good mix of the gross haiku, the historical perspective haiku, the anti-KISS haiku, and the haiku with the humorous twist. Here they are:
Tony understands law school and haiku:
Rock and roll all night;
Party ev'ry day - sounds like
Law school's Free Beer Day.
i love
Kevin's use of the double entendre here:
it's on video
I saw Annie blow a KISS
hope you've got Quicktime
And this one is just gross, but what else do you expect from the
Big Hominid?
ass of Gene Simmons
rudely penetrated by
tongue of Gene Simmons
Tuning Spork says he was trying to introduce meter and rhyme into the contest. i'm not sure he succeded, but i did like this one, which pretty succinctly describes the KISS career cycle:
Paul and Gene in charge;
Ace and Peter hit the road.
Crowds were not as large.
Pursuit's final line in this next haiku is hilarious:
Gene thinks he is hot
Long, gross tongue, hideous face
please leave now, old man
The next one, by a man i once called "
The Mark Russell of the Blogosphere" (perhaps prematurely), had me ROTFL:
One in my tight pants.
One in my make-up caked mouth.
Which lizard, baby?
And
Emily's lone submission is a crowd favorite, not in spite of, but
because of its disregard for the rules.
Gene, stick that frickin' tongue of yours
back in your mouth you filthy
damn pig
Tom gained the support of the Maximum World Order's
poet laureate with this one:
My wife saw you play
you spit on her with fake blood
I hope it was fake
El Capitan's haiku were all great, but i picked this one because i figured we had to have at least one poem in the finals that didn't bash KISS:
Ted Nugent opened
KISS then took the stage and then
Blew the damn roof off
And i like the message in number ten, also by El Capitan. To me it says:
resistance is futile, you will be assimilated by the KISS Army, regardless of how sucky the band is.
Simple loud cock-rock
Cartoon show for teenage boys
Just embrace your youth
The unfortunate thing about contests is that not everyone can win. Honorable mentions should go to
D-Rod for his attempt to work Valentine's day into the contest;
Ted for making fun of Victor's Joe Don Baker obsession;
Victor for actually working the word "autumn" into his haiku without sounding forced; Shelly and Tom for their slightly non-conforming poems, which i'm convinced were intentionally tweaked ("Haku?" ... "Wed-nes-day?");
Derek for making the only stoner reference, however oblique, in a contest about a rock-and-roll band; and
Tuning Spork for the haiku that ended with "please hand me a gun" which made me snort liquid.
Any help in deciding a winner is welcome.
Posted by: annika at
12:34 PM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 509 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I think it shoule be me.
Just, you know . . . because.
Posted by: ccwbass at February 06, 2005 11:36 PM (vJ8xh)
2
Actually, your readers are the winners... there were many, many "top-drawer" haikus...
Posted by: jtb-in-texas at February 07, 2005 05:17 AM (rphJg)
Posted by: Victor at February 07, 2005 06:17 AM (etHvD)
4
I'd just like to thank our delightful host. I have never written a haiku before, and now my one and only effort is a finalist entry in a haiku Kiss contest. I'm thinking, I should just retire now, cuz it can't get much better than this!
Posted by: Pursuit at February 07, 2005 08:21 AM (VqIuy)
5
Copy what Pursuit said - and thanks for picking my entry as a finalist. That said, I think Tom's was really good - I figure any haiku that makes me laugh deserves to win.
Posted by: Tony at February 07, 2005 11:00 AM (tjFjH)
6
Tough call, but I vote for Tom. I appreciate the way he personalized it, and the last line does a great job of saying volumes in few words.
Posted by: Matt at February 07, 2005 11:35 AM (SIlfx)
7
A very tough choice indeed.
I'm going with Emily!!
Posted by: red at February 07, 2005 12:50 PM (qxKkx)
8
I vote for Emily's as well, and not ONLY because I fear what she might do to me if I didn't. ;-)
Posted by: Dave J at February 07, 2005 01:02 PM (CYpG7)
9
This crowd say, for the disregard of almost every haiku rule (in a haiku contest) AND for summing up the general reaction to KISS - Emily!
Posted by: peteb at February 07, 2005 01:04 PM (BRWW2)
10
Sweet! Not bad for a few minutes of work! Next up, KISS sonnets!
Shooting from the hip
I land two in the top 10
Man, I hope I win!
Posted by: El Capitan at February 07, 2005 01:32 PM (dhRpo)
11
What can I say? I am an
artiste. I cannot allow myself to be harnassed by such miniscule constraints like rules of rhythm and format. And to be fair, nearly everyone above submitting a vote on my behalf is actually a friend of mine who are probably voting for me for reasons other than a deep appreciation for my art.
Not that I wouldn't love to put "Winner, 2005 KISS haiku contest" on my resume or anything. That would be cool.
Posted by: Emily at February 07, 2005 03:01 PM (JmXeT)
Posted by: Mr Bingley at February 07, 2005 03:41 PM (Lbtah)
13
Tho I do like Emily's, and Capitan's entry #10, I'm a-gotta vote for Tom's.
Posted by: Tuning Spork at February 07, 2005 05:15 PM (DLwY5)
14
In the interests of self preservation, I vote for Emily.
Posted by: Bill McCabe at February 07, 2005 07:02 PM (L2eC5)
Posted by: Andrew Ian Dodge at February 08, 2005 04:49 AM (ni3Uj)
16
And to be fair, nearly everyone above submitting a vote on my behalf is actually a friend of mine who are probably voting for me for reasons other than a deep appreciation for my art.
I thought I had made a new friend, until the last part.
I, for one, have a deep appreciation for Emily's art.
Posted by: Victor and his seventeen pet rats at February 08, 2005 07:21 AM (L3qPK)
17
Victor, you have made a new friend. Especially since I am now comforted knowing that my genius has been appreciated in my time.
Posted by: Emily at February 08, 2005 08:14 AM (JmXeT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Temporal Based Communication
Here's an
interesting communication theory i never really thought about before, which i think has a lot of merit. i can think of examples of it among some of my acquaintances and i'm going to watch for it in the future.
i tend to speak in the "was" mode a lot of the time, but that's understandable. i gotta get some use out of my history degrees.
Posted by: annika at
10:14 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Interesting...thanks for linking this.
Posted by: David Foster at February 06, 2005 06:51 PM (xnnNs)
2
I meant to read the post, but I was distracted by her picture. She's kinda hot.
Now I'll go back and try to read the post while studiously ignoring the hot chick . . .
Ah, that's better. Yes, very interesting. Thanks!
Posted by: Matt at February 06, 2005 09:20 PM (TLYaI)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
119kb generated in CPU 0.0788, elapsed 0.1713 seconds.
80 queries taking 0.1433 seconds, 315 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.