[part of a continuing series]

I know it's like beating a dead dog over and over again, but I feel like if I don't blog about these things when I see them, people might forget.

Check this article from AP, with the headline: "Iran leader praises Hezbollah resistance."

You will note that nowhere in the article does the word "resistance" appear, which leads one to believe that the editors who wrote the headline chose that word because they think it properly describes what Hezbollah is up to.

I'm not asking for an unbiased media, I just want them to admit that they are on the side of the enemy.

Posted by: annika at 02:43 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 116 words, total size 1 kb.

D-Rod is in the lead with $1500; Tuning Spork has $1200; Leif has $1100; Shelly and Victor are tied with $700 each; Law Fairy has $500; Maximum Leader and KG have $300 each; Matt of Overtaken By Events and Trint have $200 each; Drake Steel, TBinSTL and SkippyStalin have $100 each.

The category is "Anal Bum Covers," for $400.

Posted by: annika at 09:20 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.

You all remember the story about LBJ, after he saw Walter Cronkite declare the Vietnam War "unwinnable." He switched off the tv and said, famously:

If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost Middle America.

Is this a sign that some kind of critical mass has been reached?

Well, at least he's still got Annika.

Update: I think it's important to note that neither Michael, nor Rich have given up on Iraq. I am concerned, though, that Michael Yon has not been able to return to the war zone as he has requested. When Rich Lowry starts to get worried, it's even more important that we have the benefit of Yon's reportage, with his uniquely objective voice. Otherwise the real story will continue to be held captive by a biased or disinterested mainstream media.

Posted by: annika at 07:40 PM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 165 words, total size 1 kb.

From Monsters & Critics:

[British Airways] has hit back at reports that more than 5,000 items of passenger luggage had gone missing since security measures were implemented at Heathrow airport.

There had been suggestions that up to 10,000 bags had been mislaid at the UK's busiest airport, and while a spokeswoman for the airline admitted that bags had been separated from their owners, they had definitely not been lost.

Posted by: annika at 10:52 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.

... including the conclusion of Annika's Jeopardy. We're in the homestretch now.

Meanwhile, go visit Gates of Vienna.

Posted by: annika at 09:18 AM | Comments (3) | Add Comment
Post contains 25 words, total size 1 kb.

This is freakin' classic! Thanks Beth.

Don't forget to click the link too.

Posted by: annika at 05:29 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 21 words, total size 1 kb.

Okay, since nobody has a clue about the clue in Round 21, here's the full album cover with the letters blocked out.

You people are mostly older than me, I'm surprised you're not up on your 80's bands.

If Nobody gets it, D-Rod will retain control of the board. I probably won't post anything this weekend, since my brother's in town and I'm going to hang out with him. But you never know.

Posted by: annika at 06:45 AM | Comments (20) | Add Comment
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.

1 X Under the Big Black Sun Great, great album, IMO.

Posted by: Dan-O at August 11, 2006 07:58 AM (yMnY4)

2 Oops. Better make that "What is the album 'Under the Big Black Sun' by the great LA band X?

Posted by: Dan-O at August 11, 2006 08:04 AM (yMnY4)

3 *bzzzz* Who is X?

Posted by: Victor at August 11, 2006 08:05 AM (1oGDT)

4 Both Dan-O and Victor are missing elements in their responses, and therefore the judges can't accept them.

Posted by: annika at August 11, 2006 09:16 AM (zAOEU)

5 Bzzzz! For $600, "What is 'Under the Big Black Sun' by X"?

Posted by: d-rod at August 11, 2006 09:22 AM (+b4FD)

6 Dang.

Posted by: Victor at August 11, 2006 09:29 AM (1oGDT)

7 Annika, if you don't post this weekend, you'll be missing out on the latest from your favorite American Skankwoman. Drudge currently links to an online article that also includes a hilarious YouTube video of her. Intellectually, this girl's from the same sheep farm as Anna Nicole Smith. Kevin

Posted by: Kevin Kim at August 11, 2006 11:13 AM (1PcL3)

8 Bzzzzzzzzt......! For $500 Who are X?

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 11, 2006 12:29 PM (IQjm9)

9 "Who are X?" Why, none other than John Doe, Xcene Cervenka, DJ Bonebreak and Billy Zoom.

Posted by: Dan-O at August 11, 2006 01:11 PM (yMnY4)

10 Bzzzt. Wasn't that "White Wedding" guy in a band named X? Bzzzt.

Posted by: Kevin at August 11, 2006 02:51 PM (++0ve)

11 some interesting questions of rules interpretation presented by the latest responses. i'll have to consult with the judges for a ruling.

Posted by: annika at August 11, 2006 03:06 PM (Uzok0)

12 Kevin, Billy Idol was in "Generation X". A very different band. Annie, the clue requests the name of the band, not the album. And I can't believe I didn't recognize it right off the bat. The world "detail" threw me off. I assumed it was a small part of the cover. (I looked at that entire wheel on Led Zeppelin III, mwheh.)

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 11, 2006 04:03 PM (IQjm9)

13 That's not the controversy. The questions for the judges are: Can D-Rod guess again, even though a) he already responded, and b) there was a time limit which applied to him alone, which expired. The controversy is that a hint was given, so does that a) reset the whole clue, or b) just reset the whole thing as to those people who were not subject to a time limit. What is fair? I realize D-Rod and T-Spork are the only ones with dogs in this fight.

Posted by: annika at August 11, 2006 04:33 PM (C8Oer)

14 I never play this game but always keep up. So, if Annika is asking an opinion of the audience, this member votes for "a) reset the whole clue." It seems to be the most fair because the clue was given to all participants without reference to whether time limits or second guesses were allowed.

Posted by: Blu at August 11, 2006 04:38 PM (LXOfu)

15 The word "detail" threw me off too, but if I were a judge i'd rule to start over with a new $500 question instead of a Daily Dbl. Anal for Five, please.

Posted by: d-rod at August 11, 2006 06:11 PM (+b4FD)

16 Welp, the way I read it is that, once d-rod missed the deadline, you threw it open to all comers. Since you made no indication that a brand new time limit for d-rod was in place, it's an open call. Then again, this is d-rod's Daily Double and perhaps he should benefit from the revised clue in the same way as the original clue. But, shoulda woulda coulda. Since d-rod didn't answer by 9:00pm PDT, it was up for grabs. Unfortunately, no one had a clue apparantly, so you posted the hint, noting: If Nobody gets it, D-Rod will retain control of the board. The question was then answered (...er, the answer was then questioned...) according to the rules. The only controversy is that you are second-guessing yourself. You could have left well-enough alone and just announced "no answer" and let d-rod pick another category. But you didn't and are now wondering if you are screwing d-rod by not extending the time limit to the updated clue. I feel your pain. I don't think any of us expected a "hint" to follow and, really now, it shouldn't have. So, in the interests of commity, I would like to lift this burden from your shoulders and suggest that you give another, different clue for d-rod's choice of anal bum covers for $500. Even make it a Daily Double if ya like! Would that settle it for ya?

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 11, 2006 07:01 PM (IQjm9)

17 Just do what all the other Judges do; declare a mistrial and start over (leaving the defendant in custody, of course).

Posted by: shelly at August 12, 2006 02:06 AM (BJYNn)

18 The judges ruling is in. D-Rod gets credit. For his next category he has stated his preference for anal. unnh that didn't sound right.

Posted by: annika at August 15, 2006 10:58 AM (zAOEU)

19 Which do you want, D-Rod, 300 or 400?

Posted by: annika at August 15, 2006 11:52 AM (zAOEU)

20 Thanks judges! I'd like anal for four hundred, please.

Posted by: d-rod at August 15, 2006 02:53 PM (+b4FD)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

[part of a continuing series]

The prime impetus for modern American liberalism is the opposition to any restrictions on abortion. The prime impetus for European liberalism is anti-semitism.

Posted by: annika at 09:16 AM | Comments (29) | Add Comment
Post contains 27 words, total size 1 kb.

What is it with these terrorists and the 11th?

I was on a lot of planes during my vacation, and I didn't see a single muslim. Not that that means anything, but I remember noticing it at the time. Usually there's one or two waiting at the gate whenever I fly and I go through the usual mental gyration. You know the one, like this: "oh there's some muslims... I wonder if I should get on the plane... oh no then I'd look like a total racist... I guess they look okay... gee I hope they're not terrorists." Then you get on the plane, nothing happens and you realize you were nervous about nothing. But of course, then something like today's arrests happen.

People are saying this was supposed to be bigger than 9-11. If the plan was to blow up a dozen planes over the ocean, it would have been big. On a scale with 9-11, but it wouldn't have been worse than 9-11. Which makes me think that maybe they were planning to wait until the planes were over the U.S., and detonate the explosives over populated areas. Just a theory.

Or maybe not. Thinking about the whole "fourth generation warfare" thing, it's probably not in the terrorists' interest to "top" 9-11's horror. Ten or twenty planes blowing up over the ocean is evil enough to demonstrate that the terrorists are still there, and that they can still pull shit. It would have been terrible for the victims and their families. People would have been shocked and there would have been political repercussions for sure. But I still don't think it would have been big enough to change certain attitudes which need changing before we can really take care of the problem.

Attitudes like this one:

Do I sound as if I don't believe this alert? Why, yes, that would be correct. I just don't believe it. Read the article. They say the plot had an "Al Qaeda footprint." Ooh, are you scared yet? What that really means is that they found NO evidence whatsoever that the plot had anything to do at all with Al Qaeda, but the plot simply made them think "gosh, this is something Al Qaeda would do." That's what a footprint means. Nice, but no cigar.

Were these guys totally innocent? Probably not. But there's no reason to believe they were any more Osama's right-hand than Jose Padilla, the famed dirty-bomber who I think is now only being charged with jay-walking or something...

You know what, after three plus years of blogging I've learned that I can't argue against such an idiotic theory. People who believe that shit will never be silent, but people will stop listening to them someday.

Posted by: annika at 08:06 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 554 words, total size 3 kb.

D-Rod gets the last Daily Double!

Let's go over the Daily Double rules once again.

The rules for Daily Double are almost the same as on tv, with an important exception. In my game everybody gets to play the Daily Double.

Every response must have a wager in it. The lowest you can wager is $100 and the highest you can wager is either $500 or however much money you have earned already, whichever is higher. Or you can wager any amount in between.

Since D-Rod picked the Daily Double, his response gets priority. If you guess before him you run the risk of tipping him off to the correct response. If D-Rod either guesses wrong or does not respond by the expiration of his time limit (9:00 p.m. Pacific time on Thursday) the rest of the responses will count in order of their posting.

Here are the official standings. Tuning Spork is ahead with $1200; Leif is second with $1100; D-Rod has $900; Shelly and Victor are tied with $700 each; Law Fairy has $500; Maximum Leader and KG have $300 each; Matt of Overtaken By Events and Trint have $200 each; Drake Steel, TBinSTL and SkippyStalin have $100 each.

The category is "Anal Bum Covers." I'll post the clue after I eat some dinner.

Okay, here's the video clue. I'm certain it's google proof!

Reminder: Just in case it wasn't clear. The time limit applies only to D-Rod. If he doesn't respond by 9:00 p.m. Pacific Time tonight, the clue is still open to anyone who wants to try.

Posted by: annika at 07:48 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 269 words, total size 2 kb.

Although I saw United 93 the day it came out, I haven't made up my mind whether to see World Trade Center by Oliver Stone. Slate's review, which points out some glaring inaccuracies (what a surprise in an Oliver Stone film) makes me lean towards waiting for the DVD.

Since the filmmakers have repeatedly stated their desire to "chronicle what happened as truthfully as we could," World Trade Center will likely go down in the minds of many as a historical and factual account. But Sereika recently told me that he felt the entire rescue, as portrayed in the film, is "fiction"—the facts are so distorted that he didn't recognize what he was seeing as what he lived through.

. . .

This is a case where Hollywood can't be accused of hyping reality—the real rescue was much more amazing and harrowing, especially when you hear the men tell it themselves.

Posted by: annika at 07:34 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 198 words, total size 1 kb.

There's an excellent article in Sunday's San Francisco Chronicle regarding a subject I tried to write about here. The subject is "fourth generation warfare."

The question I asked, and which the Chronicle article addresses, is this: How does a state fight against a non-state in a new era of warfare in which non-states seem to have the advantage?

Look at Hezbollah. It used to be that the side with the most casualties was the loser. It used to be that the side who was forced to give up ground to an opponent was the loser. But as we've seen in the Israeli-Hezbollah war, the world has entered a new era of warfare in which every casualty suffered on the side of the non-state combatant becomes a weapon to be used against the state combatant.

In this new type of warfare, it behooves Hezbollah (and those particular Iraqi insurgents whose goal it is to end the U.S. "occupation") to maximize casualties on their own side of the fence. What we have is a war of attrition in which one side sacrifices its own citizens in order to obtain a strategic goal by non-military means, i.e. by propaganda.

Chronicle staff writer Matthew Stannard provides a more detailed description of "fourth generation warfare:"

A use of all available networks -- political, economic, social and military -- to convince enemy political leaders that their strategic goals are either unachievable or too costly to achieve.

A lack of clearly defined conditions, including beginning and end, victory or defeat, peace or war, civilian and combatant. Modern wars of this type tend to last for years as conflict surges and ebbs and moves between political, military and other battlegrounds.

Antagonists are organized more as sprawling, "leaderless" networks than as tight-knit hierarchies.

At least one side is something other than a military force organized and operating under the control of a national government -- a force that appears widely dispersed and largely undefined, lacking bases, centers of power and other traditional points of assault. These groups tend to seek to use their opponents' size, power and legitimacy against them.

An emphasis on high technology that allows small organizations to asymmetrically attack larger ones -- for example, availability of weapons of mass destruction, tools of electronic warfare or easy access to global media for purposes of propaganda.

What we've seen with "fourth dimensional warfare" is a completely new way for weak opponents to attack and beat strong opponents. I would say this is one of the lessons of Vietnam, and like the "minie" ball revolution, military planners are slow to recognize that the rug has been pulled out from under them. It is especially important that we get a handle on this problem now, because the Cold War is over and we are going to be fighting Hezbollahs and al Qaedas for the forseeable future.

What concerns me is that, in the battle of civilizations called the "War On Terror," the thing that makes us civilized is the thing that makes us weak -- our compassion. When your enemy is uncivilized, and has no concept of compassion, it's hard to win if you're swayed by world opinion.

My thesis is that we cannot win under these new rules. Only a return to the more brutal methods of World War II can beat these non-state actors and their principals (Iran, Syria). But we can't resort to those older methods unless we abandon our aversion to civilian casualties. And I don't see that happening absent a horrific über-9-11 as a catalyst.

Which is why I ended my last post on the subject with that cryptic and ominous final sentence.

h/t Belmont Club

Posted by: annika at 02:20 PM | Comments (15) | Add Comment
Post contains 677 words, total size 4 kb.

1 I was all ready to beotchslap u, until you reached your conclusion. Well done grasshopper. It's gonna be ugly when we take the gloves off, and that day be a'commin.

Posted by: Casca at August 09, 2006 02:42 PM (2gORp)

2 You are right, Annika. Unfortunately, 50% of America and more than 50% of Europe live in Fantasy Land, where if you just "talk," or "negotiate," or "understand" the enemy, all will be good. This idiocy is going to get a lot of civilized people killed while the barbarians continue to storm the gates. Today is the 61st Anniversary of the bombing Nagasaki. Lives were saved and a way of life ensured because we had the courage necessary to make the price too high for our enemies. I hope we don't have to lose another 3,000 citizens before we understand the reality of today and our enemy.

Posted by: Blu at August 09, 2006 02:54 PM (j8oa6)

3 The Chronicle and you forget one important element, Annika. That warfare cannot work without the cooperation, collusion and encouragement of Western media, No one stages a propaganda event unless the media is willing to cover it the way the propagandist desires. If the media ignores the event or critically reports on the event, the events soon disappear. The way to end this type of warfare is to convince the media to develop some ethics and put an end to their bloodlust.

Posted by: Jake at August 09, 2006 03:28 PM (r/5D/)

4 Jake, Excellent point. Thanks for bringing it up. Michelle Malkin has done an amazing job of late cataloging examples of MSM distortion (e.g. Reuters photo manipulation). It is tough to win a war when your own media is clearly cheerleading for the jihadists.

Posted by: Blu at August 09, 2006 03:44 PM (LXOfu)

5 Jake, that's not going to happen. We have to assume that the mainstream media is lost for the forseeable future.

Posted by: annika at August 09, 2006 03:45 PM (zAOEU)

6 Annika: I guess I agree with you. Media ethics is an oxymoron.

Posted by: Jake at August 09, 2006 04:47 PM (r/5D/)

7 You are right, we have to get savage to win this type of war. In fact I believe the following; War should be "nasty, Brutish, and short." Immigrants should be "safe, legal, and rare" and Liberals should be "Stopped, dropped, and rolled".

Posted by: kyle8 at August 09, 2006 05:12 PM (bYW7A)

8 lol, Kyle

Posted by: annika at August 09, 2006 06:00 PM (qQD4Q)

9 Ain't it a shame that while we drop th e bomb on Iran (OK, Israel will do it for us) and level Iran and Syria to parking lots, we can't assemble the entire maintream media to cover it, and send them a love package as well? Casca, the gloves are coming off, and soon. The next attack by the IslamoFascists will turn the tide, and the Bushies will use it to clean house. Hell, they've got my vote now. Why wait?

Posted by: shelly at August 10, 2006 01:11 AM (BJYNn)

10 We're just waiting for the baptism of Carlo & Connie's baby.

Posted by: Casca at August 10, 2006 06:17 AM (rEC2k)

11 Do you guys really think another terror-attack like 9/11 will wake up the Liberals, the MSM, the rest of the free-world? I think they're committed to their warped view of the world where the U.S. and President Bush are to blame for everything, and the solution to all of the world's ills are negotiations, cease-fires, and humanitarian aid. You underestimate just how stupid liberals are, like they underestimate just how dangerous Islamofacism is.

Posted by: Rob at August 10, 2006 07:08 AM (9DumO)

12 Maybe the word "stupid" was too harsh. Let me change that to "misguided."

Posted by: Rob at August 10, 2006 07:10 AM (9DumO)

13 Annie - Don't buy into this 4GW theory. First, there is a substantial difference between a theory of wafare (like 4GW) and tactics in conducting warfare. The generational model is an ineffective way to depict changes in warfare. Simple displacement rarely takes place and significant developments typically occur in parallel. 4GW type tactics as a way of waging war dates back to ancient history, and thus predates the so-called 2d and 3rd generations as described by 4GW theorists. Insurgents, guerrillas, and resistance fighters (pick your term du jour) figured large in many of the wars fought during the age of classical warfare. (The author briefly acknowledges this point and then lets all the other people in the article speak as if somehow today is different) Increased dispersion and availability of technology, information, and finance brought about by globalization has given terrorist groups greater range of capabilities and access worldwide. Globalization seems to aid the nonstate actor more than the state, but states still play a central role in the support or defeat of terrorist groups or insurgencies. Could AQ have grown without protection and support from the Taliban government? How effective is Hezbollah without a weak Lebanese government and Syrian/Iranian support? Hamas without a variety of Arab states? Hamas, Hezbollah, and (to a lesser extent) Al Qaeda actually have integrated themselves into the social and political fabric of mainly Muslim societies worldwide. Hamas and Hezbollah have addressed the every day problems of the people because the existing State has not. Each has also become a powerful political party within their respective governments. Hamas and Hezbollah have turned their constituencies into effective weapons by creating strong social, political, and religious ties with them; in short, they have become communal activists for their constituencies, which have, in turn, facilitated the construction and maintenance of substantial financial and logistical networks and safe houses. This support then aids in the regeneration of the terrorist groups and allows states to network with them. The one point Hammes has right is these conflicts are proxy wars due to larger state issues. Credible threats to take out the Syrian and Iranian regimes and credible assurances to bolster the Lebanese government would do far more to reduce Hezbollah than unfortunately what Israel can do at the moment.

Posted by: Col Steve at August 10, 2006 09:00 AM (pj2h7)

14 Seen in that light, Col. Steve, then one of the most criticized statements of President Bush "You are either with us or you are with the terrorists" becomes one of the wisest things he's ever said.

Posted by: annika at August 10, 2006 02:14 PM (zAOEU)

15 "Credible threats to take out the Syrian and Iranian regimes and credible assurances to bolster the Lebanese government would do far more to reduce Hezbollah than unfortunately what Israel can do at the moment." Yeah, what Col Steve said!

Posted by: Blu at August 16, 2006 11:15 AM (j8oa6)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Tuning Spork edges ahead with $1200; Leif is second with $1100; Shelly and Victor are tied with $700 each; D-Rod and Law Fairy have $500 each; Maximum Leader and KG have $300 each; Matt of Overtaken By Events and Trint have $200 each; Drake Steel, TBinSTL and SkippyStalin have $100 each. There is one Daily Double left.

The category is "Canadians You've Never Heard Of," for $400.

Posted by: annika at 08:47 AM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.

This skeptical piece is by Iraqi poetess, Amal al-Jubouri; written in 2002.

Veil Of Religions

If you are One
and your teachings are One
why did you inscribe our infancy in the Torah
and adorn our youth in the Gospels
only to erase all that in your final Book?
Why did you draw those of us who acknowledge your oneness into disagreement?
Why did you multiply in us, when you are the one and only One?

Posted by: annika at 08:00 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 84 words, total size 1 kb.

Leif is breaks away from the pack with $1100; Shelly, Tuning Spork and Victor are tied with $700 each; D-Rod and Law Fairy have $500 each; Maximum Leader and KG have $300 each; Matt of Overtaken By Events and Trint have $200 each; Drake Steel, TBinSTL and SkippyStalin have $100 each. There is one Daily Double left.

The category is "Vexatious Vexillology," for $500.

Posted by: annika at 07:12 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 74 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Bzzzzzzzzzzt...! What is the Tridelta Flag? (As in: "Delta Delta Delta, can I help ya help ya help ya?!")

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 07, 2006 08:33 PM (F9CgP)

2 That was too easy for a $500 answer, btw. Y'shoulda said "three triangles" insteada "three deltas". I'll have Canadians I've Never Heard Of for $400, yay!

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 07, 2006 08:40 PM (F9CgP)

3 fuuuuuuuuuuuuuukkkk!!! that was sopposed to be fuckkin google proof!!! aaaaagh, whats a girl gotta do?! pick a category spork.

Posted by: annika at August 07, 2006 08:40 PM (qQD4Q)

4 i couldn't have said three triangles because they arent triangles they're greek letters so i had to call them deltas. believe me, i considered saying three triangles, but decided it would be too misleading. anyways, i figured its google proof because its one of the few flags not listed on FOTW.

Posted by: annika at August 07, 2006 08:43 PM (qQD4Q)

5 I am the GoogleMaster. Worship me. MWAH HAH HAH HAH HAH!!!

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 07, 2006 08:44 PM (F9CgP)

6 I naturally assumed that it would not a National Flag, so I searched: green white bars vertical pine tree three stars deltas flag There seemed to one obvious answer, but, just be sure and to see a photo of the damm thang, I checked: delta tridelta flag Can o'corn.

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 07, 2006 08:51 PM (F9CgP)

7 C'mon Spork, let go of your organ before you go blind. The girl has lost her edge after a tiring trip, and you have got to get a life.

Posted by: shelly at August 07, 2006 10:14 PM (BJYNn)

8 Hey, I am not the one who asked if the game could wait for me! I just check in purty regularly, that's all. That's what she wants; that's what she gets. Hmmmm...

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 07, 2006 11:17 PM (F9CgP)

9 No Spork, you're one of the fucking idiots stupid enough to invest you life in this game of no chance.

Posted by: Casca at August 08, 2006 02:37 PM (2gORp)

10 Bah! Click this.

Posted by: Tuning Spork at August 08, 2006 04:42 PM (paMs+)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Blu sent me the following. It's a commentary by Israeli journalist Ben Caspit for the newspaper Ma'ariv, written in the voice of Ehud Olmert. So far as I can tell, it is not an actual speech by Olmert, just something Caspit wishes Olmert had the guts to say.

I thought it was so good, I'm reprinting it in its entirety. more...

Posted by: annika at 06:46 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 1323 words, total size 7 kb.

"Fuck fucking fuck fuck fuck shit!"

Posted by: annika at 06:15 PM | Comments (6) | Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.

In the aftermath of the Reuters photo meltdown, wherein photographs taken by a freelancer were doctored for political effect, it might be a good time to note that the most compelling independent evidence of the alleged Haditha atrocities are .... photographs taken by a freelancer.

Posted by: annika at 01:19 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.

You may have been following the Reuters doctored photo controversy. If not, Beth has a great rundown.

Of course, my sources here at annika's journal came through for me again. Now we know why Reuters photographer Adnan Hajj felt the need to doctor the original photograph. Open the extended entry to view the original. more...

Posted by: annika at 11:42 AM | Comments (14) | Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.

Shelly, Leif, Tuning Spork and Victor are tied for the lead with $700 each; D-Rod and Law Fairy have $500 each; Maximum Leader and KG have $300 each; Matt of Overtaken By Events and Trint have $200 each; Drake Steel, TBinSTL and SkippyStalin have $100 each. There is one Daily Double left.

The category is "American Skankwomen," for $400.

Posted by: annika at 09:34 AM | Comments (16) | Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.