November 08, 2006
It's A New Day
It looks like I was almost spot on with my Senate predictions. If things turn out as they look like they're headed, the only race that I will not have called will be Virginia, and that only by a couple thousand votes. So I think you all better start paying attention to me. ; )
Regarding the California ballot, the news this morning is particularly disheartening. Tom McClintock lost the Lt. Governor's race to John Garamendi. I like Garamendi, but McClintock was a solid guy, and very popular. I really thought he was going to win, but this is a Democratic year and he had an R by his name.
Jerry Brown is our new Attorney General. This guy is a disgrace. His opponent had some hard hitting ads, which sounded like they were made up because they were so outrageous, but in Jerry Brown's case, the attacks were true.
Our anti-Kelo proposition went down by five points. I don't think proponents spent enough money advertising that one, though.
All the bonds won, and the parental notification measure lost. No surprise there.
The only really good California result I can point to is that Cruz Bustamonte did not win the Insurance Commissioner job. (And no, I do not include Arnold's win as a good thing.) Oh, and Prop 87, the alternative energy referendum, also went down handily.
I have a post-election post in my head, which I've been ruminating on since last weekend. It's coming, I just don't have time to write it now. The working title of the piece is "I Blame Bush," so stay tuned.
A final note before I rush off to class, and I'm sincere about this. Despite yesterday's defeat, today is a good day.
Posted by: annika at
07:53 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 297 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Annie, you were so kind to me in my bitter disappointment two years ago. I know that mix of frustration and resolve you feel now.
Let's take it out on Arizona, USC, and Stanford.
Posted by: Hugo Schwyzer at November 08, 2006 09:47 AM (yLeev)
2
During this excursion into the political wilderness, our guys will hopefully learn to stop acting like Johnson Democrats. I'm confident that the Cooch-eunuch...err...I mean...Kucinich Democrats in the House will self-destruct before 2008. Maybe Bush will finally start to veto some spending bills instead of being a damn Third Way-er.
Posted by: reagan80 at November 08, 2006 10:02 AM (dFOlH)
3
Hugo, you bring a tear to my eye.
Yes, let's hope Cal runs the table too.
Posted by: annika at November 08, 2006 10:19 AM (zAOEU)
4
Oh, Surprise, surprise! He dumped Rumnuts! How quickly two years go by.
Constently assessing, constently changing tactics, constantly assessing the objective.
Now I'll work with the democrats so that we can do big things for America.....together.
I thought we were gonna do fine yesterday......Shows what I know, heh heh.....
What a schmuck. Homer Simpson is more presidential
Posted by: Strawman at November 08, 2006 11:25 AM (9ySL4)
5
The Jerry Brown thing scares me the most, I think, and there's not much margin for error left in California. You called him a disgrace, but I think that was being polite...
Posted by: Mike at November 08, 2006 12:59 PM (Eodj2)
6
A state that would elect Jerry Brown deserves him. Fucking unbelievable.
With that said, the only liberal talk show I've ever listened to and actually liked was Jerry Brown's show. Weird.
Posted by: blu at November 08, 2006 02:25 PM (j8oa6)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday is Poetry Day: Robert W. Service
What can I say about "The Cremation of Sam McGee" except...
..."Sam McGee" is the answer to a question in Trivial Pursuit ("Who was cremated on the marge of Lake LeBarge?"). This is a fun little read that starts out sounding like a ghost story--almost like "The Tell-Tale Heart" only without the guilt-ridden confession at the end.
The Cremation of Sam McGee
There are strange things done in the midnight sun
By the men who moil for gold;
The Actic trails have their secret tales
That would make your blood run cold;
The Northern Lights have seen queer sights,
But the queerest they ever did see
Was that night on the marge of Lake LeBarge
I cremated Sam McGee.
Now Sam McGee was from Tennessee, where the cotton blooms and blows.
Why he left his home in the South to roam 'round the pole, God only knows.
He was always cold, but the land of gold seemed to hold him like a spell;
Though he'd often say in his homely way that "he'd sooner live in hell."
On a Christmas Day we were mushing our way over the Dawson trail.
Talk of your cold! through the parka's fold it stabbed like a driven nail.
If our eyes we'd close, then the lashes froze till sometimes we couldn't see;
It wasn't much fun, but the only one to whimper was Sam McGee.
And that very night, as we lay packed tight in our robes beneath the snow,
And the dogs were fed, and the stars o'erhead were dancing heel and toe,
He turned to me, and "Cap," says he, "I'll cash in this trip, I guess;
And if I do, I'm asking that you won't refuse my last request."
Well, he seemed so low that I couldn't say no; then he says with a sort of moan:
"It's the cursed cold, and it's got right hold til I'm chilled clean through to the bone.
Yet 'tain't being dead - it's my awful dread of the icy grave that pains;
So I want you to swear that, foul or fair, you'll cremate my last remains."
A pal's last need is a thing to heed, so I swore I would not fail;
And we started on at the streak of dawn, but God! he looked ghastly pale.
He crouched on the sleigh, and he raved all day of his home in Tennessee;
And before nightfall a corpse was all that was left of Sam McGee.
There wasn't a breath in that land of death, and I hurried, horror-driven,
With a corpse half hid that I couldn't get rid, because of a promise given;
It was lashed to the sleigh, and it seemed to say: "You may tax your brawn and brains,
But you promised true, and it's up to you to cremate these last remains."
Now a promise made is a debt unpaid, and the trail has its own stern code.
In the days to come, though my lips were dumb, in my heart how I cursed that load.
In the long, long night, by the lone firelight, while the huskies, round in a ring,
Howled out their woes to the homeless snows - O God! how I loathed the thing.
And every day that quiet clay seemed to heavy and heavier grow;
And on I went, though the dogs were spent, and the grub was getting low;
The trail was bad, and I felt half mad, but I swore I would not give in;
And I'd often sing to the hateful thing, and it hearkened with a grin.
Til I came to the marge of Lac LeBarge, and a derelict there lay;
It was jammed in the ice, but I saw in a trice it was called the 'Alice May.'
And I looked at it, and I thought a bit, and I looked at my frozen chum;
Then, "Here," said I, with a sudden cry, "is my cre-ma-tor-eum."
Some planks I tore from the cabin floor, and I lit the boiler fire;
Some coal I found that was lying around, and I heaped the fuel higher;
The flames just soared, and the furnace roared - such a blaze you seldom see;
And I burrowed a hole in the glowing coal, and I stuffed in Sam McGee.
Then I made a hike, for I didn't like to hear him sizzle so;
And the heavens scowled, and the huskies howled, and the wind began to blow;
It was icy cold, but the hot sweat rolled down my cheeks, and I don't know why;
And the greasy smoke in an inky cloak went streaking down the sky.
I do not know how long in the snow I wrestled with grisly fear;
But the stars came out and they danced about ere again I ventured near;
I was sick with dread, but I bravely said: "I'll just take a peep inside.
I guess he's cooked, and it's time I looked;"... then the door I opened wide.
And there sat Sam, looking cool and calm, in the heart of the furnace roar;
And he wore a smile you could see a mile, and he said: "Please close that door!
It's warm in here, but I greatly fear you'll let in the cold and storm--
Since I left Plumtree, down in Tennessee, it's the first time I've been warm."
There are strange things done in the midnight sun
By the men who moil for gold;
The Arctic trails have their secret tales
That would make your blood run cold;
The Northern Lights have seen queer sights,
But the queerest they ever did see
Was that night on the marge of Lake LeBarge
I cremated Sam McGee.
Posted by: Victor at
05:00 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 962 words, total size 5 kb.
1
The Ballad of Blasphemous Bill is the gold standard for this sort of thing. Service was a minor poet, but out of the school of adventurers that produced Masefield (they were both Red Cross Men in the first war), and ultimately Hemingway, eh another stretcher bearer. I guess they wanted to write history, not make it. In any case,
I like to think, that when I fall, a raindrop in death's shoreless sea, this shelf of books along the wall, aside my bed will mourn for me. -RS
Posted by: Casca at November 08, 2006 07:36 AM (y6dNe)
2
i love ballads Victor. i wish i could write one. thank you for finding this, i've never seen it before.
Posted by: annika at November 08, 2006 10:21 AM (zAOEU)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 07, 2006
A Silver Lining?
The silver lining is that maybe I can make some money off of this.
Introducing . . . the first post-defeat t-shirt and bumper sticker!
Posted by: annika at
11:26 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Jake at November 08, 2006 06:29 AM (V6rxT)
2
Ordering one for the family Thanksgiving dinner. Doesn't take much to fluster democrats. Kind of like eating your cake and havin it too
Posted by: Cindi at November 08, 2006 07:12 PM (YadGF)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
LiveBlogging The Results
I'll be liveblogging the results with the boys at
Six Meat Buffet tonight. Mix it in between your frantic checks of
Drudge,
The Corner and
Hugh Hewitt, if you please.
Posted by: annika at
08:01 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Dems have won the house. FOX just called it @ 8:20 PM PST. Sad day for America. Two years of Nancy Pelosi ought to be enough to remind people what Democrats are all about....
Posted by: blu at November 07, 2006 09:21 PM (MKP3x)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
For California Voters...
I'm leaving this link at the top until polls close on Tuesday.
Click here if you want to refer to my California ballot proposition recommendations.
Posted by: annika at
08:00 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 31 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Mailed my ballot in last week, voted the Annica party line!
Posted by: wayne at November 07, 2006 07:33 AM (1wBAs)
2
Thanks Ms. Annie. I just voted. Living in mid-town/downtown Sac means that the poll worker gave me a dirty look when learning that I am, gasp, a Republican. The scowl was fucking priceless. Of course, the very fact that I'm a Rep, and she likely a useless welfare grubbing Dem can generally provide a contrast between us: I'm likely smarter, better educated, and make more fucking money. Yeah, take that you commie judgemental be-yatch!
I realize that it was 7:30 AM, but turnout at my polling place, which is always busy on Presidential years, was dead this morning. Good for us because I live in a solid "Blue" part of town.
Posted by: blu at November 07, 2006 09:00 AM (MKP3x)
3
The Democrat mantra has started this morning: "voting irregularities."
How can the MSM allow the party that invented and continues to refine voting fraud get away with such ridiculous hypocrisy? Stupid question as the MSM has tried to supress Rep voting by claiming for the past 6 months that the Dems were guranteed victory today.
A Rep hold in both the House and Senate will be as sweet as a Presidential win for me. The MSM bias during this cycle is the worst I've ever seen.
Posted by: blu at November 07, 2006 10:37 AM (MKP3x)
4
I hope you report the results on these propositions. It is difficult for us outside of California to find out what happened.
Posted by: Jake at November 07, 2006 06:10 PM (V6rxT)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
This Trumps Election Coverage

BRITTANY FILES FOR DIVORCE
At TMZ.com:
Britney Spears has filed a petition for divorce from Kevin Federline.
TMZ obtained the legal papers, filed today in Los Angeles County Superior Court, citing "irreconcilable differences." In her petition, Spears asks for both legal and physical custody of the couple's two children, one-year old Sean Preston and two-month old Jayden James, with Federline getting reasonable visitation rights.
As for money, sources tell TMZ the couple, who married in Oct. 2004, has an iron-clad prenup. Not surprisingly, Spears is waiving her right to spousal support.
She keeps the house, and the cars, and the clothes, and the boat, and the horses, and the jewelry, and the dogs. He gets to keep the bong.
She's also asking the judge to make each party pay their own attorney's fees.
Spears gives the date of separation as yesterday, the same day she flaunted her incredible revamped physique during a surprise appearance on David Letterman's show. Sources tell TMZ there was no single reason for Britney pulling the plug, rather, it was "a string of events."
Spears has hired powerhouse celebrity divorce lawyer Laura Wasser, who has repped a number of celebs, including Angelina Jolie, Nick Lachey and Kiefer Sutherland.
I can't remember who had this month in the divorce pool.
h/t Michelle Malkin
Posted by: annika at
03:20 PM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 220 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Heh. When I saw the headline, I made a beeline for your blog. Glad to see you're on top of things.
Posted by: Sarah at November 07, 2006 04:16 PM (7Wklx)
2
Yes, but who keeps the homegrown porn?
Posted by: Casca at November 07, 2006 05:37 PM (2gORp)
3
Good point, Casca. Now that K-Fed's no longer a kept man, he's going to be looking for a way to make a few bucks. Selling off the homemade porn could keep him in weed for a few years.
Posted by: Matt at November 08, 2006 07:34 AM (10G2T)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Open Comments For Election Day
It's open comments. Just leave your election day story here. How did it go? What do you think?
I'm voting later today, after class. I might join in the liveblogging fun at Six Meat Buffet later tonight, so check in there too.
Posted by: annika at
12:41 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 52 words, total size 1 kb.
1
wtf? when LGF does open comments, there's like 700 c0mments. I can't even get one?!
Posted by: annika at November 07, 2006 03:05 PM (zAOEU)
2
Sorry Annie,
As an absentee voter, I feel a little out of touch with the process...and I didn't get a sticker, either.
Posted by: Mark W at November 07, 2006 03:10 PM (BJVEF)
3
I may vote, who knows, no close races here
Posted by: Scof at November 07, 2006 03:48 PM (a3fqn)
4
I early voted on Halloween. It was at the library. I thought about checking out a book, but then I didn't. Afterwards, I went trick-or-treating at a church fair. The candy was lackluster; the hot dogs were excellent.
Posted by: Leif at November 07, 2006 03:55 PM (tYFtb)
5
We absentee voted in MO. The funny thing was they sent me a military ballot and my husband a regular one, which meant he had to get it notarized. No big deal, but it seems they should've known which one to send to him.
Posted by: Sarah at November 07, 2006 04:18 PM (7Wklx)
6
I voted before work in my pajamas at 6:30AM.
My senate vote went to Tom Kean. The Democrat incumbant is one more in the culture of corruption the state democrats seem to embrace, but NJ voters are stupid and will probably re-elect him despite this.
I didn't vote down-the line Republican, my congressman (who has no detectable threat) had been very responsive to a couple of issues I've written to him about, and despite being a democrat, I'm happy with Rush Holt (NJ) so he earned my vote.
Township committee had no republican challengers so I wrote myself in.

I was the 2nd person to vote from my district, my wife was the first, that place was empty aside from the election volunteers at 6:30AM.
I can't wait to see the results from across the country, though I fear the outcome.
Posted by: Rob at November 07, 2006 05:40 PM (Q2xwR)
7
What a bunch of homos. I went to the polls, and voted with the unwashed. In deference to them, I too was unwashed and just off a bike ride, plus the Santa Annas are blowing so it was about 80, nice and stinky.
At the polling place where I had voted the last two times, I found that I no longer vote there. Big fucking surprise, I've been moved a half dozen times in the eight years I've lived here. Went home and fucked with the San Diego County BOE website until it shit out my current polling place. That took about a half hour.
Went to the newly remodled library two blocks away, and wandered around until I found the polls. Not a single fucking sign in front of the bibliotheka, but inside I was efficiently directed to the correct precinct by freshly scrubbed eager types. After making me sign by my name, I was handed a smartcard, which I plugged into the first free Diebold touchscreen machine where I voted the straight Annikan ticket with one deviation. Did I mention that I was between a woman in her ninties who was reading the ballot aloud, very annoying, and some foreign fuck who was having trouble reading at all, while he was sneezing and hacking all over me? Well I was.
After finishing my selections, and leaving my neighbors struggling with the tech side of things, I handed my smartcard back to the fetching gal at the table, and requested a handful of hand sanitizer. They had none. I went home and washed.
In the interest of full disclosure. Diebolds is headquartered in my hometown, Canton, Ohio. That is unless they've gotten smart like me and moved on. What a moneymaker this wheez must be for them. It wasn't much easier than filling in the little circle on the scan sheet.
Posted by: Casca at November 07, 2006 05:52 PM (2gORp)
8
You shoulda voted absentee in Canton; maybe your vote might have meant something.
Posted by: shelly at November 07, 2006 06:43 PM (SLFj+)
9
But then, who can really concentrate on this meaningless stuff when really important news is breaking - like Brittany Spears kissing off her asshole dependent?
Posted by: shelly at November 07, 2006 06:47 PM (SLFj+)
10
I would have voted for you Rob.
I just voted. Brisk business at my polling place, but no lines. And no problems.
Fox just announced DeWine lost, Menendez won, and Santorum lost. As I predicted so far.
Posted by: annika at November 07, 2006 06:48 PM (qQD4Q)
11
Hello, I noticed the huge number of replys in the LGF blog. I voted absentee a while ago. I'm from Maryland and voted for Steele and am hoping that my one vote will turn the tide for him!
Posted by: Drake Steele at November 07, 2006 06:50 PM (+vXQY)
12
ELECTION PREDICTION:
IF THE DEMS WIN, THEN THE ENEMY WILL HAND OUT CANDY IN GAZA JUST LIKE THEY DID ON 9/11.
Posted by: reliapundit at November 07, 2006 07:18 PM (wQPyA)
13
I was one of the unwashed voting the straight annika ticket after a few hours of sheetrocking my kitchen. I especially voted a BIG NO for a special new $150 million library in downtown Oakland billing property owners an additional $500 fucking each per year for 30 years knowing they would not be able to finish the motherfucker without going way over budget in a million fucking years. FUCK THEM ALL TO FUCKING HELL!
Posted by: d-rod at November 07, 2006 07:30 PM (A7mUo)
14
Shelly, as you know, minor league ballot box stuffing is not beneath me, however in this case it would have been pissing in the wind. Effort is admirable, accomplishment is valuable.
Posted by: Casca at November 07, 2006 07:41 PM (2gORp)
15
I spent the a.m. w/ my ballot guides and the computer, researching candidates and issues and marking the guides w/ my votes in bright red Sharpie. I liked the Diebold machine. It was quick and easy. I waited for my illiterate neighbor to come banging on my door at dinner time, like she did in '04, cursing her 41-year-old son who wasn't home from work in time to take her to the polls. It would've taken forever to talk her through the ballot so I'm glad she was covered this time.
Posted by: Joules at November 09, 2006 11:18 PM (u4CYb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 06, 2006
Memo To The Disgruntled Pro-Life Voter
Along the same lines as my "Memo To The Disgruntled Independent Voter" below, I have a message for those voters whose main issue is opposition to abortion.
What are you doing thinking about staying home tomorrow? I understand your frustration at Bush, and the Republicans, and their betrayal of conservative values. But I also know that a Democratic Congress will lead directly to fewer restrictions on abortion, and more pro-abortion federal judges. Maybe you're okay with that, but I won't have that vote on my conscience.
If you say you're pro-life, your only choice is to vote — and to vote Republican. Staying home is not an option.
Posted by: annika at
08:09 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Unless you happen to live in MA where there are NO alternatives for pro-abortion candidates!
Posted by: Phillip at November 07, 2006 12:10 PM (gNl1H)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
MNF Pick, Week IX
Tonight's game pits sucky Seattle against sucky Oakland. The big question at Qwest Field is who will be suckier. NFC champ Seattle at least has a good excuse: they're missing two great players, Shaun Alexander and Matt Hasselbeck. Bad as Seattle has been playing, they're still number one in the NFC West. Oakland used to be a sure thing on Monday Night, but if they lose this week it will be their fifth consecutive MNF loss. Oakland is currently on a two game winning streak, but it's been four years since they've won three in a row. Plus Art Shell is completely hapless as a coach.
Let's look at Oakland's last two games. They beat the Cardinals, a semi-pro team from somewhere around Phoenix. And last week they managed to beat a sloppy Steelers team, despite moving the ball only 98 yards the whole game! The Raiders' third-string QB, Andrew Walter has thrown nine interceptions and been sacked 28 times since he took over for Aaron Brooks. Last week he threw for 51 yards. This is not only one of the worst Raider teams ever, it's probably one of the worst NFL teams ever.
So, the Seahawks are going to win, but will they cover? They're favored by 7½. I think the smart money is going with Seattle to cover the spread, and that's what I recommend too.
Result: No surprise, the Raiders not only suck, they don't care that they suck. I however, am now 6 and 3!
Posted by: annika at
05:42 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 257 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"You keep thinkin' Butch. That's what you're good at."
Posted by: Casca at November 06, 2006 07:57 PM (2gORp)
2
Congrats, for the first time in MNF Annikan predictions, you have now transcended mediocrity. The Annikan contrarians should now start doubling down.
Posted by: Casca at November 07, 2006 07:15 AM (qmJpf)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Quote Of The Day
Dean Barnett, at
Hugh Hewitt's:
[I]f the lefty blogosphere is some sort of La Cosa Nostra, that canÂ’t be good news for Oliver Willis because heÂ’s obviously Fredo.
LOL, except he'd capsize the rowboat before they ever got out on the lake.
Posted by: annika at
04:49 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 1 kb.
1
LMAO, I can't believe that ANYONE reads that stupid fuck! The mere fact that he still exists on the web is a monument to human tenacity. I think of him as a dumber fatter Juan Williams. A touchstone on life's journey, all one need do is shoot a back azimuth from their recommended course.
Posted by: Casca at November 06, 2006 08:02 PM (2gORp)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Memo To The Disgruntled Independent Voter
I agree that the number one issue in tomorrow's election is the war in Iraq. I also agree that things are not going well over there, and it's time for a change. I understand that a lot of independent voters want to give the Democrats a try, with the hope that maybe they can do better than Bush in what seems like a no win situation. Believe me, I share your frustration.
But remember, not all change is good. Sometimes things can change for the worse. Please read Frederick Kagan's column in the Weekly Standard. Here's a key excerpt.
The pullback of U.S. forces to their bases will not reduce the sectarian conflict . . . . It will increase it. Death squads on both sides will become more active. Large-scale ethnic and sectarian cleansing will begin as each side attempts to establish homogeneous enclaves where there are now mixed communities. Atrocities will mount, as they always do in ethnic cleansing operations. Iraqis who have cooperated with the Americans will be targeted by radicals on both sides. Some of them will try to flee with the American units. American troops will watch helplessly as death squads execute women and children. Pictures of this will play constantly on Al Jazeera. Prominent "collaborators," with whom our soldiers and leaders worked, will be publicly executed. Crowds of refugees could overwhelm not merely Iraq's neighbors but also the FOBs themselves. Soldiers will have to hold off fearful, tearful, and dangerous mobs. Again, endless photographs and video footage of all this will play constantly. Before long, it will probably prove necessary to remove the embedded U.S. troops from the Iraqi military units. The situation will become too dangerous; the Iraqis will increasingly resent the restraint the embeds place on their actions; and the U.S. military will become fearful of being implicated in death-squad activity. It is a matter of chance whether the embedded troops are pulled before any are kidnapped or taken prisoner by Iraqi military units turning bad or being infiltrated by radicals.
. . . There will be no "decent interval" here during which we withdraw in reasonably good order--the withdrawal itself is likely to occur in the midst of rising violence. Instead of pictures of Americans on the embassy roof in Saigon, we will see images of Iraqi death squads at work with U.S. troops staying on their bases nearby. And let us not forget that in the world of Al Jazeera, we will be accused of encouraging those death squads. The overall result will be searing and scarring. The damage to the morale of the military could be far greater than what will result from burdening soldiers with longer or more frequent tours of duty in a stepped-up effort to achieve victory. Those who are concerned about the well-being of the Army should fear defeat of this type more than anything.
We know these things to be possible, because they've happened before: after Vietnam.
Do you want your vote to be responsible for the reign of terror that will inevitably follow our retreat from Iraq? I know no matter how pissed I am at the mistakes and the lack of progress, I don't want that blood on my conscience.
There is no third way; there is only defeat or victory. And thus the choice tomorrow is clear, because you know what the Democrats want to do. Even if you don't believe the Democrats want us to lose, you should give serious thought to whether you want us to lose, and to what would happen if we were to begin withdrawing forces from Iraq now, when they're needed there most.
Posted by: annika at
02:39 PM
| Comments (11)
| Add Comment
Post contains 618 words, total size 4 kb.
1
We can stop terrorists, but we can't stop a civil war; just get caught up in it.
Posted by: Talmadge East at November 06, 2006 03:39 PM (yeLux)
2
Annika,
I don't think the choices are quite as limited as you would like to believe thereby presenting you with only one voting option. I heard Kagan on the Lehrer show the other night and thought he was right on the mark. He sounded incredibly informed and reasonable and what you reprint seems to be as well.
I don't think he would agree with your choice of what losing means or what a victory might look like. Or even using these simplifications to describe any outcome.
I am at a loss to conceive of a way by which we might "fix" this situation. This is hardly the same as winning. Nor do I think pulling out would be a loss (since we really aren't fighting anybody in particular; certainly not an enemy that presented a threat to America) as much as it would be a tragedy of immense proportion tacked onto the current tragedy that is ongoing and also major. It would be the acknowledgement of a blunder of immense proportion: a foreign policy agenda that was, as many knew from the start, doomed by its hubris, ignorance , craven wish for revenge and shallow analysis of the nature of the forces that attacked America .
Bush and his cronies have broken something and rendered it unfixable. The horrific miscalculations that they employed as the basis for the invasion and the resolution they envisioned will be treated by history as a blunder on a scale never seen before in this nationÂ’s short history. We cannot "win" if winning means installing an "elected" government that will have the will and means to enforce the rule of law over this culturally diverse nation which is infected with the deep and irreconcible religious and cultural differences. No rule of law will succeeded unless a brutal tyrant commanding a loyal military and secret police can be resurrected. Or a colonial power is found that is willing to fully occupy Iraq with 5-7 hundred thousand troops, crush the resistance and then provides ongoing and open-ended support for an unpopular government as the British did too many times to mention.
Needless to say neither of these two scenarios is going to happen.
The Dem's will talk pull-out and may also may try diplomatic initiatives with neighbors, especially Iran and quite possible it will all come to nothing and two years from now they country will be just as bogged down as now. But what they wonÂ’t do is simply abandon Iraq. They, like you, would not want the consequences on their conscience.
I am very pessimistic. I see no way to right this wrong with out a continuation of the bloodshed and I have no hope of a substantive change in the status of the Iraqi government.
Part of me would like the see the balance in the house and senate maintained for another two years insuring a Democratic victory in '08. W is rapidly becoming megalomaniacal and so distant from reality that his total and through meltdown with out any help from a powershft would be gratifying
Posted by: Strawman at November 06, 2006 07:12 PM (9ySL4)
3
Thanks for the reminder Annika.
I know almost nothing about military strategy, and I bet the strawman knows about as little as I do.
The majority of people in the military seem to agree with your analysis. Shouldn't their expertise be given some credence? Sure you can find a handful who disagree, but in the main, read the mil bloggers ...
btw, I have a new url for
things you should do
Posted by: irishlass at November 07, 2006 09:49 AM (BPJO6)
4
Why write "elected?" There is no proof whatsoever of rigged voting in the Iraq elections. There is more likely more voting fraud perpetuated by American Democrats than there was by those in Iraq.
Posted by: blu at November 07, 2006 10:34 AM (MKP3x)
5
BLu,
I didn't say voting fraud. I was watching a documentary as I mentioned the other night made by a women who spent 6 months with various Iraqi families leading up to the election and the aftermath. One family, educated people, father a doctor sat watching TV one night belitteling Bush's statements about fighting them in Bagdad not in Austin and laughing also about the puppet government the US installed.
I don't really know too much about the process by which candidates were certified which is, I suppose, as important as the vote casting process if you want to evaluate the Democratic process. So I based my comment on this Iraqi doctor's comment. Prolly no better than anything you have to offer I'm sure.
Posted by: Strawman at November 07, 2006 11:25 AM (9ySL4)
6
Well, except that the entire international community was watching and evaluating the Iraq elections. There were no major problems found. (Luckily, Jimmy Carter wasn't in charge because as we know he certified Chavez's election despite his party's Nazi-like tactics and obvious and real intimidation of his rivals. But, then again, Dems love their Commies.)
And, of course, the other obvious comment is who did put together your documentary. If it was done by a left-winger or PBS, there is a good chance it was blatantly and unashamedly bias and probably full of errors. Thank God Michael Moore really raised the bar for the documentary....
Posted by: blu at November 07, 2006 11:59 AM (MKP3x)
7
Blu,
The money for the documentary was some small funding organizations. I know the producer. This was a simple follow people around and hear what they have to say. Follow people around and observe the conditions of their lives, no commentary, no editorializing. You, Blu, if you cared to, could see it for your self. Without too much effort most things of this nature are DL able. Title is "My COuntry, My COuntry"
Rather than telling me how bad the barn smells inside, why don't you go on in.
Nice to see my boy Danny Ortega making a comeback! BTW, did you know Nicaragua is only a two day march from Texas? I heard that nit wit Ronny Raygun on NPR this morning in a program about Ortega. Sound familiar? The Republicans have using those fear tactics forever. What would they do without fear?
Posted by: Strawman at November 07, 2006 02:09 PM (9ySL4)
8
More interestingly, did you hear that he (Ortega) converted to Catholicism?
Posted by: blu at November 07, 2006 02:28 PM (MKP3x)
9
No, I had not! Pretty weird. Does that mean he won't try to reverse the total ban on abortion they passed last month?
Posted by: Strawman at November 07, 2006 03:06 PM (9ySL4)
10
I think that he was campaigning like he wouldn't...but politicians are politicians in every country. So, who knows.
Posted by: blu at November 07, 2006 03:10 PM (MKP3x)
11
"I don't want that blood on my conscience."
This sounds a bit too strident, blame-transferring, and fear-instilling. The situation is probably already beyond restoration, so staying for 4 more years will likely accomplish little.
The Administration blundered too many times, from WMD deception and losing Bin Laden, to Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and resurgent Taliban, and Iraqi militias.
Posted by: will at November 07, 2006 07:49 PM (h7Ciu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 05, 2006
Pre Election Mental Warm-Up Suggestion
Just keep repeating to yourself:
Nancy Pelosi from San Francisco
Nancy Pelosi from San Francisco
Nancy Pelosi from San Francisco
Keep repeating until it sinks in.
Posted by: annika at
03:26 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 34 words, total size 1 kb.
1
This is the mantra that scares the hell out of me
Alcee L. Hastings Chairman of the Intelligence committee
Alcee L. Hastings Chairman of the Intelligence committee
Alcee L. Hastings Chairman of the Intelligence committee
He was impeached and removed from his federal judgeship in 1989 for conspiring to take a $150,000 bribe and give light sentences to two convicted swindlers.
Posted by: Jake at November 05, 2006 04:03 PM (V6rxT)
2
welcome to the real culture of corruption, baby
Posted by: annika at November 05, 2006 08:33 PM (OBxeU)
3
Here's an example of a reply I sent to anyone who sent me propaganda about fradulent elections when the Repubs have won.
IF THE DEMOIDS GAIN ANY SEATS IN THE HOUSE IT'S ONLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE GENIUSES LIKE NANCY PELOSI AND JOHN KERRY RIGGING THE ELECTIONS!!! DON'T FORGET THE DEMONCRATS OPPOSED IRAQ'S LIBERATION AND THEY WOULD LOVE FOR SADDAM TO STILL BE RULING THE COUNTRY INSTEAD OF HANGING FROM A TREE FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!!
AND THE DOW IS OVER 12,500%#$@%^!!!
Posted by: d-rod at November 06, 2006 09:23 AM (d7VOh)
4
Oh--I was trying to _forget_ Nancy Pelosi from San Francisco so I could keep focused on my work today.
Posted by: Joules at November 06, 2006 11:25 AM (u4CYb)
5
Pelosi and the Dems are already beginning the mantra about "voting irregularities." This time they are complaining about issues with electronic voting. You know the electronic fix that they clamored for after their idiot voters couldn't figure out a very, very, very simple ballot - a ballot with which 7-year old children had no problem.
Recent polls have them reeling. So, they are starting usual Dem bullshit. If they don't win, they will say it was because the election was "stolen." Sound familiar? These guys don't like Democracy unless they get the outcome they want.
They may win, but they are pathetic.
Posted by: blu at November 06, 2006 01:50 PM (IDpQp)
6
Denny Hastert knew bout Mark Foley; did nothing.
Denny Hastert knew bout Mark Foley; did nothing.
Denny Hastert knew bout Mark Foley; did nothing.
Posted by: Talmadge East at November 06, 2006 03:41 PM (yeLux)
7
Talmadge,
You managed to be grammatically incorrect three times in a row.
Posted by: blu at November 06, 2006 05:00 PM (IDpQp)
8
Nancy Pelosi leads the Democrats with a fiery style that could make her the first woman Speaker of the House.
Posted by: Diamonds at November 07, 2006 02:44 PM (GY5SM)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 04, 2006
I Go On The Record — Update
On Tuesday I
went on the record, saying that the Democrats will pick up five Senate seats to split the upper house 50/50. I just spent the last hour re-analyzing the latest polls, and I stand by that prediction.
Democrats will gain seats in Missouri, Montana, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Rhode Island. Republicans will fail to take over Democratic seats in Maryland, New Jersey and Minnesota. Republicans will hold on to their seats in Virginia and Tennessee.
The races where I might be wrong are, of course, the hotly contested Montana and Missouri elections.
Montana perplexes me. I don't know enough about the issues to say why, but Democrat Tester has consistently polled ahead of Republican Burns since April. It might be Tester's haircut. Tester's ads portray him as a regular guy, someone you could have a beer with. By contrast, Burns seems more like, well, Mr. Burns. The race is still close. The latest Zogby poll has Burns down by a percentage point. But I'm still calling it for Tester. I think Montanans are turned off by Burns' alleged Abramoff connections, and Tester is a native who looks the part. I also think you can probably trust Montana poll numbers more than you would some other state's.
In Missouri, Republican incumbent Jim Talent is polling about three points behind Democrat Claire McCaskill. The polls have switched back and forth all year between the two candidates. If I'm wrong about any of my predictions, Missouri is likely to be the one. But I think Missouri is a weird state; it seems so evenly split between red and blue. One thing I think McCaskill has going for her is that there are large urban areas where the Democrats can use fraud to add a few unearned points to her total. Talent seems like a good guy though, and I hope he wins.
I could also be wrong about Virginia. I predict Republican incumbent George Allen will hold on to win, despite recent polls showing Democrat Jim Webb with a one to five point advantage. I'm sticking with Allen because I trust Virginia is at heart a conservative state, and I don't trust the pollsters there. When was the last time a Democrat won a national election in Virginia? Okay, Chuck Robb, but he was a centrist. Webb may have a certain appeal to conservatives, but if voting for him means handing the Senate over to the Democrats, I think Virginians will do the right thing.
Finally, I'm still sticking with my prediction that Maryland's open Senate seat will remain in Democrat hands. When was the last time a Republican won a national election in Maryland? And my fraud theory holds here too. I really hope Steele wins, though. After what they've done and said about him, Steele's Democrat critics ought to wear sheets and hoods. It's disgusting.
My best case scenario for Republicans has them maintaining a Senate majority by three seats. Santorum, DeWine and Chafee are toast. But if Steele, Talent and Burns win, there's our three seats. Of course I'm still assuming that Allen and Corker win Virginia and Tennessee, but I think they will.
The House is way too complicated for me to analyze, so like I said before: trust Gerrymandering.
Update: See how far out on a limb I am? Only one guy at the Weekly Standard agrees with me.
Posted by: annika at
12:32 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 576 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I think the Republicans will pick up seats both in the Senate and the House. It will be a Demoblowout.
Posted by: Jake at November 04, 2006 04:32 PM (V6rxT)
2
The folks at The Weekly Standard are split on on whether Reps keep the Senate. They are nearly unanimous that the Dems will pick up anywhere from 20 to 35 house seats; and, thus, gain control of the House.
I'm not quite as bleak: I think we keep the Sentate (barely), but have a hard time seeing how we keep the House when are having to compete at this late date in traditionally Red states that have voted overwhelmingly for Bush.
There have just been too many "October Surprises" in the MSM this year. Give the MSM credit, though, they carried the Dems water well this time and the Reps never played good offense.
Posted by: blu at November 04, 2006 07:46 PM (IDpQp)
3
Jake, as Shelly would say if he was sentient, from your lips to God's ears.
In the words of Allan Rickman in
Bob Roberts, "I am going to pray". If you've never seen it, it's a deliciously classic liberal attempt to lampoon conservatives, that has exactly the opposite effect.
Posted by: Casca at November 05, 2006 09:53 AM (2gORp)
4
I think the Demotards will still pull off the House.
BUT if they don't, just think how much fun it will be ragging their ass for the next two years.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 05, 2006 02:50 PM (4oxBZ)
5
Well, my husband and I did our part to keep Missouri...now we wait.
Posted by: Sarah at November 06, 2006 06:10 AM (7Wklx)
6
When was the last time a Democrat won a national election in Virginia? Okay, Chuck Robb, but he was a centrist.
So winning the Governor's mansion is irrelevant?
Posted by: djw at November 08, 2006 11:12 AM (aFBrc)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 03, 2006
What Have They Done With Nancy?
Drudge has been running this story about Where's Nancy? He claims that Nancy Pelosi has been hidden from public appearances since October 21, two weeks ago. I don't doubt it. She's as bad for the the Democratic Party's PR as John Kerry, only
twice as dumb.
Drudge says:
The woman who would be speaker, Nancy Pelosi, has oddly stayed out of the national spotlight in the week leading up to the big vote.
The high profile, potentially history-making democrat has turned low-key.
The last photo of vanishing Pelosi on the wires was from an October 21 fundraiser.
And since Pelosi appeared on the controversial October 22 broadcast of 60 MINUTES, national TV hits have all but been nonexistent.
[Pelosi did appear on CNBC's On the Money on 10/24 and on ABC on 10/26, as THINK PROGRESS points out. But the sightings have dramatically dwindled.]
Former Speaker of the House, Republican Newt Gingrich believes he knows one reason why the congresswoman has largely dropped out of public sight ever since 60 MINUTES.
"It seems clear that some Americans have glimpsed a future with her third in line for the presidency, and they don't like what they see," says Gingrich. "She has become largely invisible as a result."
A source close to the congresswoman explains she has been busy behind the scenes.
Pelosi made a brief public appearance with Bill Clinton this week in San Francisco.
After providing a long schedule of her weekend events, a Pelosi aide added that her favorite stop was the taping of a World Wrestling Entertainment podcast on the importance of young people voting, the WHITE HOUSE BULLETIN reports.
I'm wondering, if Nancy's the leader of her party, and she's being held out of sight, who's in charge? Did she take herself out of circulation? Or if not, who did? Who's the secret figure behind the scenes, who had the power to tell the House Democratic Leader to shut the hell up during the two weeks before the election? And what does that tell you about the Democrats in general? There's something they don't want you to know.
Posted by: annika at
06:10 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 335 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Howard Dean and Harry Reid have also disappeared. What is in store for America when Democrat leaders have to be in hiding in order to win elections?
Posted by: Jake at November 03, 2006 06:42 PM (V6rxT)
2
Barbara Boxer = dumb
Nancy Pelosi = dumber
I'm amazed that Dems are willing to accuse Bush of being dumb while these two idiots are still part of the Congress. Bush is a fucking curious as hell genius compared to these two morons.
Posted by: blu at November 03, 2006 06:45 PM (IDpQp)
3
Hey,
Did you guys run out of meth or something? I'm fairly certain you don't know what you're talking about.
You need a brain boost. Call Rev. Ted. He'll hook you up!
Posted by: docmakr at November 03, 2006 10:27 PM (qKXCy)
4
This can only be James Carville, the Anti-Christ, figuring out that if you are running AGAINST Bush you don't need a candidate.
Maybe he's right; we'll see just how right Tuesday night.
Posted by: shelly at November 04, 2006 03:38 AM (SLFj+)
5
Nancy is still resting in soil of her homeland after her blood feasting on Halloween.
Hey, Annie, do you read much fantasy? I am posting from the World Fantasy Convention in Austin. Its not a fan convention its a writers convention. I am trying to make contacts so I can sell some of my stuff.
I have met many leading fantasy writers including
Micheal Moorcock and David Drake.
Posted by: kyle8 at November 04, 2006 08:05 AM (CGown)
6
Oddly enough, we haven't seen national coverage of Hastert either. Or Boehner. Or even Delay, the most influential Republican congressman until recently. And what about Frist?
You're right, it seems the party leaders are letting the local races dominate.
Posted by: will at November 04, 2006 09:12 AM (h7Ciu)
7
I thought I heard Frist was no longer Senate Majority Leader...
Posted by: Scof at November 04, 2006 10:25 AM (LvTNO)
8
Mainstream America doesn't like the Pelosi wing of the Democratic party. They only appeal to the Moveon and DailyKos Bush-hating nutcases.
The Democrats know this and are trying to pull a fast one on America by hiding the gruesome side of the Democratic party and will only release the beasts AFTER they secure their victory.
It won't happen though. They are their own worst enemy.
Posted by: Rob at November 04, 2006 10:26 AM (Q2xwR)
9
Odd that Drudge should quote Newt Gingrich. He's the perfect example of what not to do when you become Speaker of the House. Like Pelosi, nobody knew who Gingrich was when the Republicans took the House in 1994.
He immediately commenced to act as if he somebody had died and made him king. People didn't much like that act. Don't expect a repeat from Pelosi. She's smarter than that.
Posted by: Pug at November 04, 2006 10:31 AM (P9o6O)
10
Pug did you just use the word smart and Pelosi in the same sentence?
You were joking, right? Right?...........
Posted by: blu at November 04, 2006 12:10 PM (IDpQp)
11
Ah, Pug, another will/strawfuck sock? Eh, who cares.
There are immutable laws to politics as there are to physics, and economics. Rotten buroughs eventually produce awful politicians, no matter the party, because there is no competition. That's the situation in California today. If the house is lost, Boehner will win it back in '08, and then he will grind Pelosi and company as is fitting.
Posted by: Casca at November 05, 2006 10:08 AM (2gORp)
12
Pelosi's political views are systemically intertwined with her decisively socialist affiliations. She has served on the executive committee of the Progressive Caucus, a socialist-leaning organization that, until 1999, was hosted by the Democratic Socialists Of America.
Posted by: RealEstateAgent at November 06, 2006 02:19 AM (UaqnT)
13
Nancy showed up over the weekend to do the media shows
and
pics would seem to explain her absense as she went and had a facial "tune up"
I think she's in the Nip and Tuck Olympics with Joan Rivers!
Posted by: Darleen at November 06, 2006 05:16 PM (cXz8w)
14
Nancy is the perfect face for the Dem Party: fake, dumb, ill-informed, socialist leaning, wealthly (inherited/unearned),elitist, and dishonest.
Posted by: blu at November 07, 2006 11:10 AM (MKP3x)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 02, 2006
I Heart Varifrank
Read and understand:
If you vote for Democrats in this election, you might think youre voting for a perfectly nice centrist Democrat, but the "Anti-war" wing of leftist thought will take that perfectly nice candidate that you voted for and use it as evidence that their side in the argument is actually perferred by Americans. Not the "centrist American" side, but the loathesome "We hate America" side. Your vote will be used to prove it.
They will take that protest vote of yours to argue "America is in descent", that our sins have finally caught up with us and we need to be sorry for all the evil we have done in the world, and look at all the people who agree with us! They will argue that fundamental changes in our country are necessary to make up for our crimes of the past, that our its our military is actually what causes wars, that people in the military should be prosecuted and they are what causes other people in the world to hate us and not our lovely and socially relevent "pop-culture".
. . . If Democrats are tossed yet another defeat this time, they will learn. They will get the message. They will remove the leech of "Anti-war" from their crotch and we might start to see Democrats like Harry Truman again. Democrats who don't apologize for America or being an American.
And that will be good for all of us.
Excellent.
Posted by: annika at
03:19 PM
| Comments (15)
| Add Comment
Post contains 248 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I'm playing "God Bless America" on the CD player. Off to read a couple of articles in National Review and I'll have my Church of Conservatism needs met for the week.
Posted by: Joules at November 02, 2006 04:10 PM (u4CYb)
2
When the Democrats go down in flames in this election, I hope there is an another group that learns its lesson.
For the past three elections, MSM has manipulated the news, sabotaged our anti-terrorism efforts and attempted to destroy our economy. They have done all this to force left-wing rule down the throats of all Americans.
MSM has ignored falling revenues, cancelled subscriptions, decreasing viewers, and massive media layoffs. Maybe after losing three straight elections, MSM will join America again and just report the news.
Posted by: Jake at November 02, 2006 04:39 PM (V6rxT)
Posted by: annika at November 03, 2006 07:12 AM (qQD4Q)
4
The Hate-America crowd will not be purged from the Demoncrat party until the Vietnam generation and their children are dead. It is an article of faith among them, that all who carried the burden of that war were ignorant murderers, rapists, and baby killers... you know, what Kerry said.
Don't worry, we might start whacking these NGCS's any day now.
Posted by: Casca at November 03, 2006 07:55 AM (2gORp)
5
"They will remove the leech of "Anti-war" from their crotch"
leech and crotch...hmmm...yes, yes he must be talking about Democrats

...and looks like it will be Michigan-Louisville in Glendale for the BCS, whodathunk?
Posted by: Scof at November 03, 2006 11:59 AM (a3fqn)
6
Wow! Did Michagoose already beat OSU? I musta lost track of the date - or the year.
Nah, I'm afraid BIG RED will be in Glendale, along with some once beaten team.
I'm also afraid that the best Michigan could possibly hope for is Pasadena, where once again, USC will hand you your ass and eat your lunch.
Posted by: shelly at November 03, 2006 02:16 PM (SLFj+)
7
"It is an article of faith that all who carried the burden of that war were ignorant murderers, rapists, and baby killers... "
You said it Casca.
Now the Iraq invaders are the newest rendition of this noble American tradition.
Posted by: Strawman at November 03, 2006 02:47 PM (9ySL4)
8
"Murderers, rapists, and baby killers" are criminals and are treated such in our military. Hopefully, Straw, you are not suggesting that our military in Iraq engages in this sort of behavior as a general rule. If you are, then you are both reprehensible and stunningly ignorant. There is no military in the world that does anymore to root out corruption and criminality in its ranks than does the US military.
The lie that this was common and accepted in Vietnam is just another Left-wing myth perpetuated by the likes of John Kerry and other America haters.
Posted by: blu at November 03, 2006 04:31 PM (IDpQp)
9
The Dems will learn? I doubt it...
Posted by: Mike@CopTheTruth at November 03, 2006 05:17 PM (YadGF)
10
Loiusville for the nat'l championship, lol, that's a good one!
Posted by: annika at November 03, 2006 05:29 PM (qQD4Q)
11
Blu,
We've had this discussion before. I am sure you know exactly what I mean. The cruelty in VN and the criminality of many. not most, many GI's is well known. Remember I am VN vet age, lost friends and relatives in this confilict, repatriated ABC News' vienamese employees to my home town, (my sister was in charge of ABC's camp Pendleton repatriation station where 4000 South Vietnamese employees were put up on the way to being place in jobs and given citizenship) I have some direct knowledge.
Posted by: Strawman at November 03, 2006 06:07 PM (9ySL4)
12
As an archivist of Straw's BS, I'm getting a sense of deja vu again. I'm about as touched by his "compassion" towards South Vietnamese refugees as much as Macaulay Culkin was during a visit to the Neverland Ranch.
[Your blowing smoke out your ass. My sister worked for ABC news and was in charge of resettling the 3000 "dependents" as they were called, of the network. CBS and NBC had similar numbers. The network employees and their families were given some kind of automatic citizenship after Saigon fell since they would have been killed or imprisioned by the ARVN as traitors and collaborators. The networks gave them money and resources including job placement. I met many of them who were resettled in the NY area. These are the people you heard interviewed.
You think they are an unbiased bunch? They lived well, benefitted from the occupation and sold out their country.]
BTW, from the same thread, Straw displays his sincere adulation for our veterans:
[Killerjoe,
I guess the basic disagreement is that the N. Vietnamese were not our enemy until we invaded their country. Sort of like the Iraqi people who are fighting back now just like you would if your country were invaded. We are the most aggressive fucks the world has seen since the fall of the British Empire.
I felt sorry for the people of Vietnam, all of them. We ruined their country and killed millions doing it. You no doubt helped and are still proud of it. You should try and get that off your chest. That is what Kerry did upon coming home. He had the courage to say the killing was a travesty bordering on the criminal; our government lied about the justification for war, and the plan, like BushÂ’s was a joke.
You had the courage to kill in the course of invading a country that did you and America no harm and you have stayed ignorant of the history to this day. WhoÂ’s the dumb scumbag?]
-From Strawman's (formerly known as Mike) Greatest Hits, Volume 1
Posted by: reagan80 at November 03, 2006 08:02 PM (dFOlH)
13
How the hell did I not know about this guy's blog before? I'm pretty damn impressed. He needs to get more pimpage!
Posted by: TBinSTL at November 04, 2006 12:40 AM (bYmT0)
14
Varifrank's article sounds like the warning's of the strategist who thought up "Contract with America", a real life surprise pulled on the American people.
With Bush's and the GOP's abysmal poll numbers, even a "war president" and his cohorts won't have enough influence to stem the tide of change. We'll see if the Republicans take to whining, as they had complained the Democrats had done.
Being an independent before an election is like being at ringside seat at a title match. Pass the popcorn!
Posted by: will at November 04, 2006 09:20 AM (h7Ciu)
15
Hey Raygun,
He called you a pimp, for me no less! Terrific. I thank you for reposting my relitively well written but better reasoned posts. (get the invoice in for the archivist fee before the end of the year, OK?) They were to the point when I wrote them and have aged well as we have seen the wonderful progress of the Bush plan in the ME. (I think you mistook my sentiment about the South VN coming to the US. I, like the ARVN, felt them to be traitors and thought they should have stayed and been rehabilatated just as you my friend would have shot, I mean rehabilitated, a colonist in Boston who gave material and personal support to the British) Bravo for Bush. I certainly feeling good and way safer, how about you Ray? Feeling good? Feeling lees scared out of you runny underware? THe advances in limb and face reconstruction are great, the C-147's outfitted as ICU's are really something to see, and the boost to the wheelchair rugby and basketball leagues is pushing them closer to a contract with ESPN. I applaud it all. You too, right? ANd Blu tells me the wonderful economic tide that's flowing in here in the states will be rising Iraq's boats soon as well. New housing is just around the corner, Parsons is knocking out thoses hospitals and police stations like my mom's toll house cookies! Hezzbolla and Hammas are theowing in the towel and making lots of con cessions, the Saudi's are playing a big part too. They are exerting lot's of clout and sending peacemakers to twist a few arms. Condi's racking up frequent flyer miles and soon will take a few free weeks in Bali, and how about Rummy, boy he just keeps hitting them out of the park. Every new strategy he tries wow's em. PAcified Bagdad's ass didn't he? I hear they added ten square meters to the green zone and put up a new gaurd tower.
Gotta sign off before I run outa breath, Iraq is amazing! My kid is thinking of appling to the University for graduate work (poly sci major) and hthen might establish residencey since ther new democracy has such opportunity to do some good in the region. Amaazing! Gotta go, my palms are getting raw from the clapping.
Oh, the generals and Richard Perle? Fuckem what do they know!
Posted by: Strawman at November 04, 2006 11:53 AM (9ySL4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Goodbye Doug!
I'll miss your blog. But only until the next
Catscratch episode!
Posted by: annika at
01:08 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 15 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's not possible to say good-bye to Doug. My husband and I met him at Pt. Loma Nazarene College in the mid-80's and we've never been able to forget him. We'll never forget when he rode the baggage carousel at the airport and got detained by airport security, when he ate ground-up crackers from the street, when he rigged the sound system to play Hell's Bells in chapel--sorry--wrong Pt. Loma legend--who would've thought he'd grow up to be a cartoonist?
Posted by: Joules at November 02, 2006 04:18 PM (u4CYb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 01, 2006
First DWTS Post Of The Season

Just because I haven't posted about Dancing With The Stars this season doesn't mean that I haven't been as obsessed as ever with the show.
I have a question about last night's competition. Did you see it? During Emmitt and Cheryl's rumba, didn't Cheryl's hand land squarely on Emmitt's little umpire at one point? And didn't Cheryl suddenly realize where it was and then move it quickly to the side? And wasn't Emmitt's little umpire signaling touchdown at that very moment?
I think so.
I also think Mrs. Smith is probably not going to let Emmitt and Cheryl spend another 13 days together "rehearsing."
Okay I'm off to watch the rest of the results show.
Update: When they announced that Il Divo would be performing tonight, I honestly expected them to sing "Whip It."
Update 2: I'm sorry to see Monique and Louie go. Monique really was fun to watch and the judges weren't always fair to her. Next week's elimination will be impossible, because the final three teams are all so good.
Update 3: YouTube just posted the Rumba, check it out for yourself.
Posted by: annika at
09:37 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 197 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Pretty hard to physically be that close to a gorgeous woman, and not have all the blood rush to the little head. Thus, brainlock. More divorces happen that way. Wives tend to be narrow minded.
Posted by: Casca at November 02, 2006 08:01 AM (Y7t14)
2
Oh yes, she definitely grabbed his crank.
Posted by: Casca at November 03, 2006 08:54 AM (2gORp)
3
I'm a little late to the party here. Sorry I missed the crotch-grab. I'm usually a dedicated viewer, but sick kids screw up the whole program.
If that's Emmitt's little umpire, rather than some kind of shadow or fold in his pants, all I can say is, well,
this.
Cheryl definitely has a thing goin', but Edyta's the one who really does it for me. Fortunately I have a defense mechanism against nubile young temptresses: I'm poor, out of shape, mediocre-looking, married, a father, and an unknown. While none of these alone is absolute protection, together they convey near-total immunity. So there's
one reason to be glad I'm not Emmitt.
Posted by: Matt at November 03, 2006 09:13 AM (10G2T)
4
Oh, yeah! I forgot "rapidly approaching middle age."
Posted by: Matt at November 03, 2006 09:14 AM (10G2T)
5
How do YOU define middle age?
Posted by: Sven Svensson at November 03, 2006 10:51 AM (76+ro)
6
Eh, roughly mid-forties on up to . . . I don't know, exactly.
OK, so I've got almost a decade to go. Whatever. A little hyperbole never hurt anyone.
Posted by: Matt at November 03, 2006 12:03 PM (10G2T)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Wednesday is Poetry Day: Sylvia Plath, previously unpublished
It's a bonus Poetry Day this week, as my lunchtime reading alerted me to the fact a previously unpublished sonnet by Sylvia Plath was released online today.
The Blackbird is Virginia Commonwealth University's online literature/arts journal. A contributing editor of the Blackbird, Anna Journey, discovered this sonnet was previously unpublished and argued it should be published. The editorial staff agreed and a transcript, along with images of an early draft and the final version, were released online today with the permission of the estate of Sylvia Plath.
And, as you might imagine, there are copyright notices all over the place on this. As a result, I provide the first line of Ennui, linked to the article in today's issue of the Blackbird:
Ennui
Tea leaves thwart those who court catastrophe,
Posted by: Victor at
10:47 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
1
What a great find, Victor!
I'm not even close to figuring it out, but it scans nice.
i think she's saying that would rather live a life with lots of drama. If so, I guess she got her wish.
Posted by: annika at November 01, 2006 02:39 PM (zAOEU)
2
Yeah, I'm having trouble w/ that one, too. Some of the notes on it I've read said she wrote that while reading
The Great Gatsby, which suggests I might have to read that sometime.
Posted by: Victor at November 01, 2006 04:08 PM (l+W8Z)
3
I like your link, due in no small part to the fact that VCU is my undergraduate alma mater.
Posted by: physics geek at November 02, 2006 11:16 AM (KqeHJ)
4
The rest of the poem is linked via the entire first line of the poem. When you go to the link, you'll see the word "Ennui" beneath Sylvia Plath's name. Click on that; that takes you to the intro. Below the intro are several links; the two to the images (early and final drafts) and a transcription. It's a very nice poem, though complex.
I'm sending you this roundabout way (instead of just forwarding the link) because I think the background and introductory material are very good and important to understanding the poem. As much as I understand, anyway. :~)
Posted by: Victor at November 03, 2006 06:26 AM (WHtgF)
5
Where's the rest of the poem? Help! Here's a guess: without seeing the rest: you know how people--especially the Brits--make cups of tea to soothe themselves. Maybe she was expressing how stopping to make tea can keep one from doing something rash or suicidal. In those days, there weren't as many options for treating severe depression so the act of focusing on the comforting tea ritual might be a distraction from suicidal thinking.
Posted by: Joules at November 03, 2006 09:03 AM (u4CYb)
6
Thanks for repeating the info above in an e-mail, Victor. Very kind of you to help out a distracted mother of three. I blame all blips on the craziness inspired by kids and autism (my youngest son, age 9). What a great poem! It feels like the title, especially the way you feel when you realize that all the great stuff you read about doesn't usually happen with such a magical quality in real life. "The alchemy of the written word" is the phrase I read the other day that describes that magic. The poem also points out how dull can get in the modern (or post-modern) world.
Posted by: Joules at November 03, 2006 03:45 PM (u4CYb)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 31, 2006
The Botched Senator
Sen. John Kerry:
You know, education, if you make the most of it, if you study hard and you do your homework, and you make an effort to be smart, uh, you, you can do well. If you donÂ’t, you get stuck in Iraq.
Sen. John McCain:
If you offend somebody, whether you intend to or not, you should apologize.
Sen. John Kerry:
I apologize to no one for my criticism of the President and his broken policy.
Listen, I
want to believe the argument that John Kerry didn't really mean to insult our all volunteer military servicemen and women. If it were any other guy, without John Kerry's history, I might be inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.
But given that John Kerry began his political career by throwing his military ribbons over the White House fence in protest over a military service which he claimed led to widespread and systematic atrocities — which he later admitted that he never witnessed, and which were later proven to have been completely made up — I sincerely doubt that his "explanation" is genuine.
If John Kerry intended to insult the president with his "botched joke," why then are the words "president" or "Bush" nowhere to be found within the text of that joke?
If John Kerry really fucked up the script so badly, why then didn't he immediately clarify himself? We've all been in that situation. When I mis-speak, and inadvertently give offense, that's what I do. It's customary, even through embarrassment, to say, "I'm sorry, what I meant to say was..." But Kerry didn't do that until the firestorm began this morning. Now that he's busted, it's a little hard to believe his denials.
Here's an instructive thought experiment. What if, instead of touching the third rail of conservative politics by insulting the troops, John Kerry's "botched joke" had imputed stupidity to African Americans? Would he then have apologized quickly and repeatedly? You bet your ass he would have, and he'd have done it based on John McCain's maxim I quoted above: "If you offend somebody, whether you intend to or not, you should apologize." The fact that John Kerry, even now after "admitting" he made a mistake, still refuses to apologize to the American military he claims to respect so much, is tantamount to insulting them a second time. He doesn't think they're worth the courtesy.
What really happened is that John Kerry had a "Dixie Chicks" moment. Like Natalie Maines in England, Kerry thought he had a sympathetic audience of liberal college students to whom he could pander, by sharing a little inside humor. "Heh, heh, I know you guys despise the military and think they're dummies. I do too. Ain't I cool? Vote for Angelides."
Should any of this matter? Probably not, since Kerry can't be voted out of office this year. (Personally, I think Kerry should be forced to resign from his seat on the Committee on Foreign Relations. Nobody with his history of undisguised contempt for American military personnel should be allowed to sit on such a committee, with that body's concomitant influence over the deployment of those same soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen.) But that's a different question from whether any of this will matter. And I hope it does. Not only because it may forestall the Democratic takeover I predicted earlier, but because Kerry's latest blunder probably and irrevocably scuttled any hope he might have had of trying for his party's nomination in '08. Democratic power brokers will never ever forgive him for this gaffe, nor should any of us.
Update: Kerry apologizes.
[Technorati tag: John Kerry; cross-posted at The Cotillion]
Posted by: annika at
08:31 PM
| Comments (24)
| Add Comment
Post contains 603 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I'm a Veteran who left a prestigous private college after two year to join the US Army to fight in the first Gulf War.
After being medically separated for injuries sustained in combat, I earned a BS in Professional Writing. I now write complex documentation sets for real-time tactical command and control systems for network-centric warfighters. I doubt Mr. Kerry has a high-enough security clearance to even read the documents that I write, and even if he did, he'd have no f'ckin idea what they meant.
Maybe If I would have studied harder I wouldnÂ’t have ended up stuck in Iraq back in 1991. Maybe I could have made something more of myself.
Posted by: Robbie at October 31, 2006 09:36 PM (53jDZ)
Posted by: Jake at October 31, 2006 09:56 PM (V6rxT)
3
The Kerry formuila for political success:
1. Open mouth;
2. Insert foot;
3. Shoot foot;
4. Deny that the foot is yours.
Posted by: shelly at November 01, 2006 03:36 AM (Eodj2)
4
Kerry's an absolute idiot. Perhaps more people realize it now. Intellectualism is not a prerequisite for military service to your country. Valor is. We happen to have the smartest military in our history. (Even the founders would be envious)
I wish I had half the guts and brains these cats have!
Posted by: Mike C. at November 01, 2006 04:30 AM (YadGF)
5
Kerry's explanation didn't make much sense to me. What he specifically said was that if you study hard, etc, you can "do well", implying that he was talking about doing well economically, and clearly referring to American youth as a class, not to future US Presidents as a class.
In any event, notice that in his explosive reaction, Kerry basically accused Republican political operatives of orchestrating the anger directed at him. He seems to have no clue that hundreds of thousands of people reacted to his words spontaneously, without having to be told what to think.
Posted by: david foster at November 01, 2006 07:25 AM (/Z304)
6
Robbie you stupid fuck, you're clearly not smart enough to marry a rich woman, me either. I only involve myself with women who suck money out of me.
We should all face the facts. Kerry is a smart guy. If we were smart like him, we'd let some fucking loser carry the load. Someone poor common fuck who'd never go skiing in Gstad anyway.
Conscripts by Siegfreid Sassoon
‘FALL in, that awkward squad, and strike no more
Attractive attitudes! Dress by the right!
The luminous rich colours that you wore
Have changed to hueless khaki in the night.
Magic? WhatÂ’s magic got to do with you?
ThereÂ’s no such thing! BloodÂ’s red, and skies are blue.Â’
They gasped and sweated, marching up and down.
I drilled them till they cursed my raucous shout.
Love chucked his lute away and dropped his crown.
Rhyme got sore heels and wanted to fall out.
‘Left, right! Press on your butts!’ They looked at me
Reproachful; how I longed to set them free!
I gave them lectures on Defence, Attack;
They fidgeted and shuffled, yawned and sighed,
And boggled at my questions. Joy was slack,
And Wisdom gnawed his fingers, gloomy-eyed.
Young Fancy—how I loved him all the while—
Stared at his note-book with a rueful smile.
Their training done, I shipped them all to France,
Where most of those IÂ’d loved too well got killed.
Rapture and pale Enchantment and Romance,
And many a sickly, slender lord whoÂ’d filled
My soul long since with lutanies of sin,
Went home, because they couldnÂ’t stand the din.
But the kind, common ones that I despised
(Hardly a man of them IÂ’d count as friend),
What stubborn-hearted virtues they disguised!
They stood and played the hero to the end,
Won gold and silver medals bright with bars,
And marched resplendent home with crowns and stars.
Posted by: Casca at November 01, 2006 07:55 AM (Y7t14)
7
I see the Rovian hand in all of this. No doubt a microchip was installed in the good Senator during operative treatment of his grievous wounds suffered in Vietnam, and Rove has once again reactivated it to control the mind of this good and honorable scion of elitist liberals.
LMAO, oh, if I could choose my enemy, it would be he.
Posted by: Casca at November 01, 2006 08:22 AM (Y7t14)
8
Casca:
Kerry is paying for every dollar with his blood. His wife ignores him completely and will not appear in public with him unless movie stars are involved. She is forever telling people in front of Kerry that her dead husband is ten times the man that Kerry is. She probably has him on a tight weekly allowance.
No wonder Kerry looks and talks angry all of the time.
Posted by: Jake at November 01, 2006 08:45 AM (V6rxT)
9
My boy, we all pay in blood when it comes to the fair sex. For all you civilians too fucking stupid to tell, my comments were all .
Posted by: Casca at November 01, 2006 08:51 AM (Y7t14)
10
Jack Heinz was a star; he's have been President by now. For them that never knew it, he was a solid Republican, the Senator from Pennsylvania. I had the pleasure of knowing him; by the way, when she was young, she was slim and a knockout, and, most importantly, she kept her fucking mouth shut 'cause he had the purse strings.
If he was alive, we'd still have Pennsylvania solid Red. Life is so unfair. But then, the only "fair" I know is in Pomona.
Thank the stars for John Kerry!!! Send him out on the campaign trail again, PLEASE!!! I loved the Demo comment "He wasn't content to blow it in '04, he wants to blow '06, too".
(P.S. Casca, great poem. I guess they teach a little at OSU)
Posted by: shelly at November 01, 2006 09:03 AM (0Co69)
11
Annika,
I don't often venture over here too much, but this is one of the best points I have heard on this matter:
What if, instead of touching the third rail of conservative politics by insulting the troops, John Kerry's "botched joke" had imputed stupidity to African Americans? Would he then have apologized quickly and repeatedly? You bet your ass he would have, and he'd have done it based on John McCain's maxim I quoted above: "If you offend somebody, whether you intend to or not, you should apologize."
You nailed it. Kudos!
Posted by: Billy at November 01, 2006 10:43 AM (SLFj+)
12
In addition to the factual mistakes about the "education" (and socioeconomic class) of U.S. military personnel, Kerry misses the point about the innovation and creativity of U.S. servicemembers. For every bad apple the media focuses attention on, there are hundreds of young men and women coming up with clever and thoughtful solutions to not only tactical battlefield problems, but also cultural, social, humanitarian, and other "non-combat" crises and conflicts. The vast majority of these young people are going to come back and infuse the same thinking into their local communities well beyond their military service.
Posted by: Col Steve at November 01, 2006 02:25 PM (pj2h7)
13
Forgive him? Forgive him? I LOVE him.
Hell, he deserves a medal (first one he ever really deserved).
RNC Most Valuable Player.
I think Karl Rove relly did insert a microchip in his brain and flipped the "off" switch at just the right time.
Posted by: shelly at November 01, 2006 03:56 PM (0Co69)
14
NPR reported this evening that the text of the speech--text supplied by Kerry's people--included the words "President Bush." The reporter read the sentence, and if that really was the way it was originally written, it was a slight directed toward President Bush. Not that this makes Kerry look any better.
Posted by: Joules at November 01, 2006 10:09 PM (u4CYb)
15
Kerry had his chance to just say "Here's what I intended to say, but I misspoke, and I am sorry for the mix-up".
Instead, he chose, in his haughty, pseudo-Franco manner to deny he had said it and to defend it, REFUSING to apologize.
By the way, there is nothing, absolutely NOTHING, more aggravating to a Jew than another Jew who refuses to acknowledge his heritage. Although he has allowed Massachusetts voters to believe that he is Irish, Kerry is NOT Irish, he is of Jewish descent. Fuck him and the ship he rode in on. (sic)
Posted by: Shelly at November 02, 2006 12:58 AM (YadGF)
16
He's a twisted bizarre personality in the extreme. His egomania is Clintonesque.
Posted by: Casca at November 02, 2006 07:14 AM (Y7t14)
17
Annika,
He made quite blunder. I can't really imagine that he set out to defame the employment prospects of the under achievers he migh have been addressing. He may be an idiot but that would rise to the level of ________?
He clearly was trying to make the equation:
"lazy ass no nothing, alcoholic national guard slacking Yale grad ignoramous= get us stuck in Iraqi criminal military adventure. True but not terribly relevant at this late date. America got the president they almost voted for. Serves the majority that elected the other guy right!
It was lame from the start and he should have done exactly what Shelly said.
Posted by: Strawman at November 02, 2006 08:36 AM (9ySL4)
18
Here is what John Kerry should have said.
I appoligize to all service personel that were offended by my comment. I reviewed the transcript and understand why those words were offensive and I sincerely apologize that I uttered them. Those words do not reflect what I was trying to say. I was attempting to state that if you are an under achiever educationally like President Bush you will get us stuck in Iraq. In the interest of making this apology sincere, I must also admit that President BushÂ’s grades at Yale were slightly higher than mine so that even my intended meaning probably would have been offensive to many. I apologize for that also.
Posted by: Bob at November 02, 2006 08:52 AM (OPNg7)
19
Straw,
In which Ivy League school did you complete your undergraduate and graduate degrees?
What's that? You got the famous GED certificate from the Marshall School for Adults. Wow!!
Just kidding you, Straw. But calling Bush dumb (or an ignoramus)is, well, dumb. His academic record was not mind-blowing, but it was better than both Lurch and Algore's. The guy has a fucking MBA from Harvard. He's just not a good speaker; and, let's face it, people from the South often sound a little dumb. The accent is not one that inspires confidence. It's not fair; but it's true.
It's just another one of those lies that the Left keeps repeating and, in this case, has managed to get many people to believe. (Funny, though not surprising, how the MSM has never widely reported on the academic mediocrity of Kerry and, the world's smartest man, Algore.)
Posted by: blu at November 02, 2006 11:13 AM (j8oa6)
20
I have a son with autism and know how very true it is that there are people who have good intelligence but they aren't wired for good verbal skills. Frankly, it often doesn't feel right if a politician is too silver-tongued.
Posted by: Joules at November 02, 2006 03:05 PM (u4CYb)
21
Blu,
I stand by my words. HArvard MBA not withstanding. This blankey everbody wraps him in is bullshit. " He just don't speak so good" is a rationale that is used to make Americas, who ain't the sharpest tack either, feel more secure.
I am a good judge of intelligence and this man is not too bright. He was passed from class to class with "passing" grades which were notices that he showed up, did a modicum of work, and was a presidents son. He did not fail. That is all you can say. Is his IQ over 120? I would guess it is and this means he knows what? That is all I am saying, he knows nothing of history, science, literature, economics, etc. If he did, regadless of how bad a public speaker he is, he could demonstrate a grasp of a subject and speak conversationally about it or answer a question that deviates an iota from his scripted remarks. You heard him when he was flogging the SS initiative? Not a wit of sense came out of his mouth when asked to explain any of it. The few people who brief him that have been candide have said in polite open ended sentences that they experienced him as not engaged. He would ask a few questions and say thanks.
Blu, you know as well as I that education is an ongoing process of inquery fueled by a love of knoweldge and curiosity. It leads us to read books, ask questions, and read more books. How do you find yourself defending a man who bragged that he didn't read books? They were so embarassed that this year his flacks can't tell you offen enough what the president is reading. Do honestly believe he can read Shakespeare? Would you bet against Kerry or Gore in a jeopardy game with George or a scrabble game?
He is a by the seat of his pants, bright guy who in spite of his background could not get anywhere in business in spite of being handed sweetheart deals. A fellow who partyed hard, liked cocaine and booze, became severly depressed as his life unraveled while his brothers succeded and hit bottom. Instead of lifiting himself up with self knoweldge and exhibiting some insight he took the bit of religion deep into his mouth, shook his head, whinneyed a little and imbibed another antidote to clear thinking and self esteem. How exactly he beacme the lackey and spokes model for the evangelicals and then nefarious neocons is a story we may never know, but that is what he is today. And as their policies fail before all our eyes he blinks, stands tall and like a wind up doll spouts the ridiculous without flinching
Posted by: Strawman at November 03, 2006 06:11 AM (9ySL4)
22
I actually think he speaks pretty fluently about economics - especially macroeconomics. Currently, America is experiencing one of its best economics periods thanks, in part, to his economic policies. The Left doesn't like to remember the bad ol'days when Clinton left office. Let me remind you: the stock market had lost about half of its value. Only the Great Depression had more of a negative emotional impact on the Market. The Dow is now around 12,000. Bush also inherited a recession and then a few months into his Presidency 9/11 occurred, (another gift from Clinton) which was devastating to our economy for both real and psychological reasons. It is simply amazing that we've recovered to this point. We managed to do this while fighting the GWOT and retooling a military that Clinton had literally gutted. (If you want to know what Clinton did to our military, talk to somebody who was in the military during his Presidency. They HATE him. Bush, on the other hand, is loved by military personnel.)
As far as social security goes, I just think you are wrong. It's a complicated topic that he was trying to explain at a high level. The bottom line is that he was right and his opponents were wrong. Not only wrong: they lied and distored the economic reality and simply tried to scare old peole. It was disgusting, but, also, business as usual for the Left. SS is a less than a worthless social program. I want to spit every time I see my money stolen from me to be given some person that I don't even know. God help us, someday will see SS in the ash heap of history. Weaning Americans off it and into a system were people control their own money is better for individual investors, our economy, and is in the best tradition of our liberal capitalist system.
And, yes, I think he could read the Bard. I don't know, however, if he would make that choice. BTW, find me the quote where he said he didn't like to read. I do know that he said he doesn't bother much with the MSM. Who the fuck can blame him? The American paper of record, the NY Times, is a worthless, socialist rag that routinely prints lies, distortions, and, of course, national secrets all the while openly cheerleading for Democrats.
Posted by: blu at November 03, 2006 06:54 AM (IDpQp)
23
"education is an ongoing process of inquery"
Hey strawman, why don't you "inquere" a little bit more on the subject of spelling?
; )
Sorry, I just couldn't resist.
Posted by: annika at November 03, 2006 06:58 AM (qQD4Q)
24
Oh, Forfend, dearest Annka. Me thinks it was the fault of the hound that hath nibbled the spellcheck button to a fare-thee-well no bigger than a titmouses'cloaca which my great finger could not navigate. Apologies.
Blu,
Wrong,
Wrong,
Wrong.
Posted by: Strawman at November 03, 2006 07:54 AM (9ySL4)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
134kb generated in CPU 0.0679, elapsed 0.136 seconds.
80 queries taking 0.1073 seconds, 327 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.