April 26, 2004

Medals Schmedals

It all depends on what the definition of 'medals' is.

i don't really give a rat's ass what Kerry threw over the fence. It's the fact that he threw anything over, and the lies he told about the men serving in Vietnam, which he has yet to apologize for, that disqualifies him from the presidency, in my opinion. Not that you asked for my opinion.

Posted by: annika at 11:11 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 69 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Of course we asked for your opinion; it is important, especialy when it is on all fours with ours!

Posted by: shelly s. at April 26, 2004 11:16 AM (rZmE1)

2 For me his present day "full grown and should be wiser" adult character is even more important of an issue than mistakes and deceptions he committed in 1971. He continues to lie in the present day on his website, and in an L.A. Times interview in Friday's edition, saying "I never mislead anybody." Also, his claims of a Republican plot are a stretch, as no Republican ads or campaign personnel have publically touched the "medals controversy," at least as far as I know.

Posted by: gcotharn in Texas at April 26, 2004 03:39 PM (AaBEz)

3 Poll: Should President George W. Bush have to prove whether he fulfilled his commitment to the National Guard during the Vietnam War, as Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry has suggested? I think Bush should provide proof of his service, so this issue can be settled, and the race for the presidency can continue. PoliticalBlogger

Posted by: PoliticalBlogger at April 27, 2004 12:11 PM (SfBQW)

4 For the love of... PB, you do understand that all of Bush's military records have been released, don't you? What other proof is required, I don't know.

Posted by: Jon at April 30, 2004 11:46 AM (B9rRW)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
15kb generated in CPU 0.0134, elapsed 0.0764 seconds.
62 queries taking 0.0675 seconds, 165 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.